Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDApacket__02-13-20_0508_30
NOTICE OF MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Chairman Erik Hansen
Vice Chairman Peter Gray
Commissioner Mathew Boik
Commissioner Clayton Corey
Commissioner Susan Demptster
Commissioner Dan Kovacevic
Commissioner Scott Schlossberg
TIME:6:00 P.M. – REGULAR MEETING
WHEN:THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2020
WHERE:FOUNTAIN HILLS COUNCIL CHAMBERS
16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ
Commissioners of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a quorum of the
Town’s Council, various Commission, Committee or Board members may be in attendance at the Commission meeting.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions, parents have a
right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions make a video or audio recording of a minor child. Meetings
of the Commission are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result, proceedings in which children are present may be subject
to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise their rights may either file written consent with the Town Clerk to such
recording, or take personal action to ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may be made. If a
child is present at the time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents pursuant to A.R.S.
§1-602.A.9 have been waived.
REQUEST TO COMMENT
The public is welcome to participate in Commission meetings.
TO SPEAK TO AN AGENDA ITEM, please complete a Request to Comment card, located in the back of
the Council Chambers, and hand it to the Executive Assistant prior to discussion of that item, if
possible. Include the agenda item on which you wish to comment. Speakers will be allowed three
contiguous minutes to address the Commission. Verbal comments should be directed through the
Presiding Officer and not to individual Commissioners.
TO COMMENT ON AN AGENDA ITEM IN WRITING ONLY, please complete a Request to Comment card,
indicating it is a written comment, and check the box on whether you are FOR or AGAINST and agenda
item, and hand it to the Executive Assistant prior to discussion, if possible.
REGULAR MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
1.CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE – Chairman Hansen
2.ROLL CALL – Chairman Hansen
3.CALL TO THE PUBLIC
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the agenda.
Any such comment (i) must be within the jurisdiction of the Commission, and (ii) is subject to reasonable time,
place, and manner restrictions. The Commission will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during Call
to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion of the Call to
the Public, individual commissioners may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or (iii) ask that
the matter be placed on a future Commission agenda.
4.CONSIDERATION OF for approving the Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting
minutes from January 23, 2020.
5.CONSIDERATION OF rezoning approximately 1.62 acres located north of the northeast corner
of N. Saguaro Boulevard and E. Shea Boulevard (AKA 9637 N. Saguaro Boulevard; APN #
176-10-805) from C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and Professional Zoning District to C-2,
Intermediate Commercial Zoning District.
(Case Z2019-04)
6.COMMISSION DISCUSSION/REQUEST FOR RESEARCH to staff.
7.SUMMARY OF COMMISSION REQUESTS from Development Services Director.
8.REPORT from Development Services Director.
9.ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted in accordance with the statement filed
by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the Town Clerk.
Dated this ______ day of ____________________, 2020.
_____________________________________________
Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant
The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call 480-816-5199 (voice) or
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2020 2 of 3
The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call 480-816-5199 (voice) or
1-800-367-8939 (TDD) 48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain
agenda information in large print format. Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the Commission with this agenda are
available for review in the Development Services' Office.
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2020 3 of 3
ITEM 4.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 02/13/2020 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission
Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services
Prepared by: Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant
Staff Contact Information:
Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language): CONSIDERATION OF for
approving the Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting minutes from January 23, 2020.
Staff Summary (Background)
The intent of approving previous meeting minutes os to ensure an accurate account of the discussion
and action that took place at that meeting archival purposes. Approved minutes are placed on the
Town's website in compliance with state law.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
N/A
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
Approval
Staff Recommendation(s)
Approval
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to Approve the Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting minutes dated January 23,
2020.
Attachments
Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Development Services Director John Wesley 02/06/2020 03:06 PM
Form Started By: Paula Woodward Started On: 02/06/2020 02:05 PM
Final Approval Date: 02/06/2020
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 23, 2020 PAGE 1
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 23, 2020
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Chairman Erik Hansen
Chairman Hansen called the meeting of January 23, 2020 to order at 6:00 p.m.
1. MOMENT OF SILENCE – Chairman Erik Hansen
2. ROLL CALL — Chairman Erik Hansen
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Erik Hansen; Commissioners, Mathew Boik, Clayton Corey,
Dan Kovacevic and Scott Schlossberg. Vice Chairman Peter Gray was absent.
STAFF PRESENT: Development Services Director John Wesley and Executive Assistant Paula
Woodward.
3. CALL TO THE PUBLIC
None.
Pursuant to ARS. 38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed
on the agenda. Any such comment (I) must be within the jurisdiction of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and (ii) is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The Planning
and Zoning Commission will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to the
Public" unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion
of the Call to the Public, individual commissioners may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to
review a matter, or (iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Planning and Zoning Commission
agenda.
4. CONSIDERATION of approving the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated
December 12, 2019.
Commissioner Corey MOVED to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
dated December 12, 2019; Commissioner Dempster SECONDED: passed unanimously.
5. CONSIDERATION OF Ordinance 20-03 amending Chapter 12, Commercial Zoning Districts,
by adding a new provision to Section 12.02 B., to allow indoor vehicle sales and rentals in
the C-1 zoning district.
Chairman Hansen opened the public hearing at 6:02 p.m.
Mr. Wesley reviewed the application request for a text amendment to the Fountain Hills Zoning
Ordinance, Chapter 12, Commercial Zoning Districts, Section 12.02 B, adding a new
subsection (12.02 B.4.) allowing new and used vehicle sales in the C-1 zoning district and
establishing criteria for the use.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 23, 2020 PAGE 2
Mr. Wesley explained that staff has meet with the applicant over the past few months regarding
proposed indoor vehicle sales including motorcycles at the Vets Auto Center. The vehicles
would be sold on consignment to raise money for the Veterans of Foreign War Organization
(VFW). The center is located in a C-1 zoning district that does not allow for more intense uses
such as vehicle sales. After review, it was decided that a text amendment was a better choice
than rezoning the property since it is surrounded by residential. C-1 zoning is intended to be
that transition from more active commercial to residential district. It is designed to be close to
a residential area without negative impact. The C-1 district allows for commercial sales activities
(indoors) such as bookstores, hardware stores and pharmacies. In addition to the large auto malls,
the car industries is shifting such as indoor lots and displays, for example; Tesla and Carvanna. To
lessen the impact of vehicle sales in a C-1 zoning district the applicant agreed to indoor sales
only, no service activities, limit the square footage and hours of operation. Mr. Wesley said
commission feedback is necessary regarding the size and hours of operation. The applicate is
present for questions. Mr. Wesley said that he was comfortable with the approval provided
the hours and size are clarified.
In response to Commissioner Boik, Mr. Wesley said that the C-1 zoning districts are along the Shea
corridor, Saguaro Blvd. near Panama, Glenbrook and Fountain Hills Blvd. and the West Shea area
near Fry’s.
Commissioner Corey confirmed the applicant owned the proposed building for the indoor car
sales. Commissioner Corey asked how the cars would be brought into the building.
The applicant and building owner, Vladimir Buer said that there were many glass panels on the
building. The HOA allowed the removal of the glass panels and replacement with doors. The
doors are large enough to allow cars to enter and exit the showroom. Mr. Buer said he
contacted the other building tenants and they are in agreement with the indoor vehicle sales.
In response to Commissioner Dempster, Mr. Buer said that he owns the property along Monterey
and up to the next building. There are 12 parking spaces in one area and 40 plus on another area.
The vehicle display area would be indoor only. As far as the noise, there is a concrete wall between
the parking area and the residential area. The parking area is used now and there have not been
any compliants about noise.
Commissioner Kovacevic asked if other than vehicles would be sold to raise money at this location.
Mr. Buer said that this location is for motorcycle and vehicle sales. They are donated or sold on
consignment. There may come a time that an auction would take place once a quarter.
In response to Commissioner Kovacevic, Mr. Wesley said there are certain parking requirement
that go along with auto sales. Typically, in a joint use such as this, it is assumed the parking is set
up to go along with mixed use. The Tractor Supply is zoned C-2 and the Target Center is zoned C-
2 PUD.
Commissioner Kovacevic asked how many cars would be on display.
Mr. Buer said the showroom would support 12 to 15 vehicles. There are 12 covered parking spaces
in the back. Five of those are designated for this operation.
Commissioner Corey expressed concern regarding if there are more cars than can be display at
any given time.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 23, 2020 PAGE 3
Mr. Wesley said that to some degree this would be a code enforcement issue. It would be
expected the covered parking spaces might be used temporary while cars are shifted around.
Commissioner Schlossberg asked for details regarding the on-site auction.
Mr. Buer said the on-site auctions would be held quarterly. The auctions would most likely take
place on a Saturday during a limited timeframe. The auction would take place inside. If the
vehicles do not pass a safety inspection, they are not displayed. Non-running vehicles or those
that do not pass safety inspections, are picked up by a contract company from the donor. The
contractor makes a donation to the VFW. The maximum number of cars inside will be 12- 15 cars.
Mr. Wesley reminded the commission that all C-1 zoning would be affected by this text
amendment change.
Discussion took place regarding the restrictions of a C-1 zoning and C-2 zoning.
Chairman Hansen said that the idea is for this business to operate and look like a retail store rather
than an auto sales lot.
Chairman Hansen asked the commission what comments they had regarding hours of operation
and the size of the business.
The Commission agreed that although the C-1 zoning allows a business to stay open until 11 p.m.,
this might not be a good idea with a residential neighborhood so close. They agreed on a closing
time of 9 p.m., seven days a week.
Commissioner Dempster added that there be no overnight parking.
No one from the public wished to speak.
Chairman Hansen closed the public hearing at 6:39 p.m.
Commissioner Corey MOVED to recommend an approval to the Town Council for Ordinance 20-
30 amending Chapter 12, Commercial Zoning Districts, by adding a new provision to Section
12.02 B., to allow indoor vehicle sales and rentals in the C-1 zoning district with the following
stipulations; no overnight parking, maximum business size is 5,000 square feet and the business
must close at 9 p.m., 7 days a week. Case Z2019-09; Commissioner Schlossberg SECONDED:
passed unanimously.
6. COMMISSION DISCUSSION/REQUEST FOR RESEARCH to staff.
None
7. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION REQUESTS from Development Services Director.
None
8. REPORT from Development Services Director.
Mr. Wesley confirmed that the Planning and Zoning Commission would met once a month on the
second Monday of the month. The new schedule begins March 9, 2020. The caveat would be if
there were a case that could not wait for a regular meeting; a special meeting would take place.
The town manager is supportive and the town council has been notified.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
January 23, 2020 PAGE 4
Mr. Wesley informed the commission they each have a copy of the General Plan Update 2020 in
front of them. The 60-day review period begins when these are sent out to all the agencies. There
is a stakeholders meeting on February 26, 2020, in the Council Chambers, 6:30 p.m. The Genreal
Plan Update 2020 will be on the Planning and Zoning Commissions March agenda. This will
allow for any public and commission feedback. The Planning and Zoning Commission’s April
meeting will be the official public hearing with recommendation to council. Council is scheduled
to take action at their May meeting. Town Council will vote at their June meeting.
9. ADJOURNMENT.
The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission held December 12,
2019, adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Town of Fountain Hills
Erik Hansen, Chairman
ATTEST AND PREPARED BY:
Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Session held by
the Planning and Zoning Commission of Fountain Hills in the Fountain Hills Council Chambers on the 23rd day of
January 2020. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present.
DATED this 3rd of February 2020.
Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE
ITEM 5.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 02/13/2020 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission
Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services
Prepared by: John Wesley, Development Services Director
Staff Contact Information: John Wesley, Development Services Director
Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language): CONSIDERATION OF rezoning
approximately 1.62 acres located north of the northeast corner of N. Saguaro Boulevard and E. Shea
Boulevard (AKA 9637 N. Saguaro Boulevard; APN # 176-10-805) from C-1, Neighborhood Commercial
and Professional Zoning District to C-2, Intermediate Commercial Zoning District.
(Case Z2019-04)
Staff Summary (Background)
This request is to rezone the vacant property north of the northeast corner of Shea and Saguaro
Boulevards from C-1 to C-2. The intended purpose for the property is the construction of a three-story,
66 room hotel.
This property has been zoned C-1 since the start of Fountain Hills. The surrounding property to the
south, east, and west has also been zoned C-1. All of this property, except for the site now planned for a
hospital, has been developed with a variety of retail and office uses. The property immediately north
was originally zoned C-1 but was rezoned to R-5 in 1986 for the development of Monterra Ranch.
General Plan
The land use designation for this area is C/R - General Commercial/Retail. The stated intent for this
designation is to provide for the "sale of convenience goods (food, drugs and sundries) and personal
services that meet the daily needs of a multi-neighborhood trade area."
The Vision statement in the Land Use Element is: A Town that seeks to preserve its character and beauty
using land use principles that allow development in a cohesive and beneficial manner to protect
neighborhoods and support business development."
Land Use element Goals and Objectives that relate to this specific request include:
Objective 2.1 The Town should continue to employ a policy to encourage the overall
development of existing commercially zoned lands and the renovation of underutilized
commercial building.
Objective 3.2 The Town should study issues and implement solutions related to infill,
revitalization, and redevelopment of the commercial land and existing uses along Shea Boulevard
and Saguaro Boulevard.
Goal Five: Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent land uses.
Zoning Pattern
Typical zoning patterns place the most intense zoning and land uses at major arterial intersections and
along major streets and then step down to less intense zones and uses to provide buffers and transitions
to residential areas. The C-1 and CC zoning districts are the least intense commercial zoning districts in
the Town. The C-2 District is more intense in terms of some of the uses allowed (e.g. auto repair, bars,
drive-in restaurants, liquor stores, etc.) and in terms of allowing stores to operate 24 hours a day (C-1
and CC are restricted to hours from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.).
A request was made last year to rezone the property across Saguaro to the west from C-1 to C-2. There
was significant neighborhood opposition to this request and it was denied by Council. Chief concerns in
that case was the more intense uses that could happen in close proximity to the adjacent single
residence neighborhood.
Planned Use
As shown in the attached illustrations, the request for the C-2 zoning district has been made due to the
desire to construct a 3-story hotel on the property; this use is not allowed in the C-1 district. Section
2.01 B 1 b of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a tentative development plan be submitted with each
rezoning application. A final site plan will be submitted for staff review and approval at a later date
prior to submission of construction drawings. While this tentative development plan gives an idea of
how the property owner is planning to use the land at this time, this development plan does not impose
any restrictions on the ultimate use of the property. For any reason the property ownership could
change, or the current owner could change their mind and decide to use the property for any of the
other uses allowed in the approved zoning district.
Analysis
This area has been planned and zoned for commercial uses since the founding of Fountain Hills. Most of
the area has been developed and used for a variety of commercial activities for many years, this is one
of few lots remaining to be developed.
The General Plan recognizes that the area of Shea and Saguaro Boulevards is under transition and a
good place to locate a mix of office, retail, entertainment, and residential uses. Given the proximity to
the SR 87 Highway, this is a good location attract and serve both local and regional needs. C-2 zoning
has been introduced into the area at the Tractor Supply and at the Target Center.
The General Plan supports the idea of developing the tourism industry in Fountain Hills. Hotels can be a
good revenue generator for the Town from both the taxes on the hotel stay and any purchases that take
place in the Town during a hotel stay. The applicant reports that current hotels in Fountain Hills have an
annual occupancy rate around 75%, which is high and shows some demand in the market for additional
hotel rooms. This average comes from nearly 100% occupancy in the prime season and around 50% in
the off season. Hotel rooms are currently under construction at CopperWynd and the Lakeshore Hotel is
being renovated.
As part of the rezoning application, staff asked the applicant for a traffic impact analysis. That analysis
reviewed a wide range of commercial uses that could result from C-2 zoning, not just the impact of the
proposed hotel. That analysis did not show any adverse impact on the adjacent streets due to the
development of this property with C-2 uses.
Of primary consideration in review of this request to rezone from C-1 to C-2 is the General Plan Land Use
Goal Five which states: "Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent land
uses." Development of C-2 uses on this property could negatively impact the adjacent residential
property. As stated previously, the Council has recently denied C-2 across Saguaro due to concerns from
the adjacent neighborhood with the potential impact C-2 uses. In that case the adjacent properties are
zoned and developed with single-family uses and the street pattern allows direct access from the
commercial activities into the residential neighborhood. In this case, the adjacent property is zoned for
multi-family uses and the property is developed with attached single-family homes and there will be no
direct street access from the commercial area into the neighborhood.
Potential impacts still exist, however, in terms of the lights, noise, and activity that can occur
with C-2 uses, including a hotel. One significant difference between the C-1 and C-2 zoning
districts is the height allowed. In the C-1 District the maximum height is 25'; in the C-2 it is 40'.
However, the setback from the adjacent residential use increases with the building height
(setback must at least 40 feet for the proposed 40' tall hotel). Also of concern are the hours of
operation. People who purchased property and live in Monterra Ranch did so with the existing
commercial development being closed at night. Rezoning to C-2 will allow 24-hour operations.
The nature of the uses also become more intense with the additionally allowed uses, primarily
drive-thrus being a use by right.
Many of these impacts can be addressed through site and building design. In this case, the
applicant has tried to mitigate impacts by designing the hotel with the entry on the opposite
side from the residences and including significant landscaping along the north property line.
While the site plan provided is a "tentative development plan" and other site plans could be
provided in the future for any use allowed in the C-2 zoning district, stipulations could be
included on the approval of the zoning to ensure whatever development occurs provides the
buffers and transitions needed to mitigate any negative impacts of the development. The
attached draft ordinance includes a stipulation for a landscape buffer of trees along the north
property line. Additional stipulations could be added.
The tentative development plan includes an access drive around the north side of the building
to provide emergency access for the fire department. This results in the trees planted along the
north property line not having a lot of room. There is a concern with the Willow Acacia trees
being shown. The trees are shown to be planted just a few feet from the north property line.
The radius of the mature tree is about 20'. This will put significant portions of the tree canopy
into the rear yards of the adjoining residential properties. Any tree that is tall enough (at least
20' tall) to provide screening of the hotel and prevent people in the hotel from looking into the
homes, would have this same issue.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
General Plan Chapter 3 - Land Use Element
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 12 - Commercial Zoning Districts
Risk Analysis
N/A
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
While the proposed use as a hotel on this property has been designed in a manner to significantly
reduce the potential negative impacts, staff has concerns with the introduction of a 40' tall building in
this location and impacts that come with the C-2 zoning district. Approval at this location would set a
precedent for similar zoning of adjacent properties. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the
requested rezoning.
Should the Commission determine rezoning to C-2 is appropriate for this location, a draft ordinance is
attached. The draft ordinance include one stipulation related to trees along the north property line that
could be used to mitigate the current use and any other uses that might be proposed for the property.
Additional stipulations could be added should the Commission identify other key development
standards that would be important for this or other uses on the property to address potential impacts.
The draft ordinance also includes a procedure for reverting the zoning back to C-1 should the property
owner not proceed with the hotel in a timely manner. This could be included in the recommendation to
Council or deleted if the Commission determines it is not necessary.
SUGGESTED MOTION
Staff will help the Commission draft a motion as necessary.
Attachments
Vicinity Map
Application
Submittal Documents
Letters
Draft Ordinance
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Development Services Director (Originator)John Wesley 02/06/2020 03:04 PM
Form Started By: John Wesley Started On: 01/21/2020 02:32 PM
Final Approval Date: 02/06/2020
FAIRFIELD INN SUITES
3 STORY
67 GUESTROOMS
SETBACK
SETBACK
SETBACK
19'-0"
9'-0"5'-0"11'-0"
19'-0" 24'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 24'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0"
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
ELECTRICAL EASEMENT
SEWER EASEMENT
U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T
ABANDON SEWER EASEMENT
no
r
t
h
PLANTRUEnorthFIRE ACCESS LANE
THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY
OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR
REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON
DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C.
©
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
#
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
OWNER:
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
P: 801.355.6868
F: 801.355.6880
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
CONSULTANT:
2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
PROJECT:
SHEET #
BY
M
A
R
R
I
O
T
T
DATE DESCRIPTION
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
#
P.
O
.
B
O
X
2
0
7
FL
A
G
S
T
A
F
F
,
A
Z
8
6
0
0
2
03/15/19 REZONE APP.
1/
6
/
2
0
2
0
3
:
4
4
:
4
0
P
M
C:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
a
d
a
h
l
\
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
1
8
-
1
8
4
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
I
n
n
F
o
u
n
t
ain
H
i
l
l
s
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
V
1
9
_
A
d
a
h
l
@
t
r
d
p
.
c
o
m
.
r
v
t
A0
5
0
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
S
I
T
E
PL
A
N
18
-18
4
.
0
1
EL
RH
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
I
N
N
&
S
U
I
T
E
S
96
3
7
N
O
R
T
H
S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
FO
U
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
,
A
Z
8
5
2
6
8
CH
A
L
E
T
,
I
N
C
.
RE
Z
O
N
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
1/16" = 1'-0"1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
SHEET NOTES
V I C I N I T Y M A P
PROJECT
LOCATION
XXXX
GENERAL NOTES
1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
2. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CIVIL DOCUMENTS. ANY
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT AND CIVIL
ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION. NO WORK SHALL BE PREFORMED ON THE
CONTRADICTORY INFORMATION OR ANY EXISTING CONDITION NOT IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITHOUT FIRST
CONSULTING THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER.
3. COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPING, PARKING STRIPS, AND SIDEWALKS
SHOWN WITH LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION OF DRY UTILITIES.
CONTRACTOR TO WORK WITH UTILITY PROVIDER, IE: FIBER OPTICS,
CABLE CO., FOR RELOCATION OF SHORING, MAINTENANCE OR REPAIR OF
ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. REFER TO CIVIL AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR
WET UTILITIES.
5. FOR SIDEWALK AND PAVING FINISH GRADES, COORDINATE WITH
ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS.
6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR ALL SITE LIGHTING/ POST LIGHTS.
ARCHITECT AND LANDSCAPE TO VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS.
SITE INFO
LOT AREA:
BUILDING:
LANDSCAPE:
PAVING / SIDEWALK:
OUTDOOR PATIO:
70,804 S.F. (1.62 ACRES)
14,521 S.F. (21%)
18,852 S.F. (26%)
36,746 S.F. (52%)
656 S.F. (1%)
PARKING:
(1 PER UNIT + 1 PER 2 EMPLOYEES)
REQUIRED: 72 STALLS
PROVIDED: 60 STALLS*
*(INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE & 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE)
*(12 STALLS SHARED PARKING PROVIDED WITH EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT)SAGUARO BOULEVARDS
H
E
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
UP
A2011
A200
2
A200
1
A201 2
4
A300
4
A300
6
A300
6
A300
5
A321
A420
1
2
A300
2
A300
A421
1
1
A300
1
A300
A408
1
A400
1
A402
13
A300
3
A300
5
A300
5
A300
A418
1
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
6
6
7
7
8
8
11
11
9
9
10
10
12
12
15
15
14
14
13
13
16
16
17
17
H H
K K
S S
R R
E
E
P P
C C
M
F F
FOOD
PREP.
012
WORK
ROOM
036
OFFICE
037
4'
-
1
0
1
/
8
"
1
1
2
18'-2"
4
A320
2
A320
A423
1
A052
1
5.4
5.4
3.2
3.2
WW
UU
A A
B B
D
G G
L
N N
T T
VV
XX
7.8
7.8
Q
VESTIBULE
001 CARTS
002
STORAGE
003
IN-A-PINCH
004
REGISTRATION
005
LOBBY
007
LOUNGE
008
QUICK
PRINT
006
MECH /
ELEC
009
WATER
010
HALLWAY
011
BUFFET
013
BREAKFAST
019
ELEVATOR
LOBBY
020
FITNESS
021
MEN R.R.
022
VESTIBULE
023
WOMEN
R.R.
024
POOL
025
POOL
EQUIP
026
MECHANICAL
027
CORRIDOR
029
ICE
030
EMP
BREAK
031
DRYERS
032
LAUNDRY
033
ELEV
EQUIP
034ELEVATOR
MDF / PBX/
MATV
035
STAIR 1
185
STAIR 2
190
PATIO
600
QUEEN
QUEEN
102
KING
104
KING
106
KING
108
KING
110
QUEEN
QUEEN
101
QUEEN
QUEEN
103
KING
105
KING
107
ADA KING
109QUEEN
QUEEN
CONNECTOR
111
C.
O
.
S
.
C.O.S.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.
O
.
S
.
C.O.S.
C.O.S.
C.O.S.
C.O.S.
no
r
t
h
PLANTRUEnorthSS200
1
SS200
2
SS2011
SS201 2
SS210
1
SS210
2
SS2111
SS211 2
211'-4 1/2"
80
'
-
5
3
/
4
"
THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY
OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR
REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON
DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C.
©
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
#
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
OWNER:
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
P: 801.355.6868
F: 801.355.6880
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
CONSULTANT:
2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
PROJECT:
SHEET #
BY
M
A
R
R
I
O
T
T
DATE DESCRIPTION
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
#
P.
O
.
B
O
X
2
0
7
FL
A
G
S
T
A
F
F
,
A
Z
8
6
0
0
2
03/15/19 REZONE APP.
1/
6
/
2
0
2
0
3
:
4
6
:
1
9
P
M
C:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
a
d
a
h
l
\
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
1
8
-
1
8
4
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
I
n
n
F
o
u
n
t
ain
H
i
l
l
s
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
V
1
9
_
A
d
a
h
l
@
t
r
d
p
.
c
o
m
.
r
v
t
A1
0
1
MA
I
N
L
E
V
E
L
F
L
O
O
R
PL
A
N
18
-18
4
.
0
1
EL
RH
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
I
N
N
&
S
U
I
T
E
S
96
3
7
N
O
R
T
H
S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
FO
U
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
,
A
Z
8
5
2
6
8
CH
A
L
E
T
,
I
N
C
.
RE
Z
O
N
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
SHEET NOTESXXXX GENERAL NOTES
1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
2. ALL EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE GRID, FACE OF FOUNDATION WALL
(U.N.O.).
3. ALL EXTERIOR FRAMED WALLS ARE LOCATED WITH EXTERIOR FACE OF
SHEATHING ALIGNED TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE AND GRID
(U.N.O.).
4. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS SHEETS FOR DETAILED NOTES ON
FINISHES AND EQUIPMENT.
5. ALL GYP. BOARD WALLS AND CEILINGS ARE TO BE PAINTED (U.N.O.).
6. ALL INTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND WINDOW FRAMES SHALL BE
PAINTED.
7. ALL DOOR OPENINGS ARE LOCATED WITH THE HINGE SIDE 4" OFF THE
CORNER (U.N.O.).
8. FIRE SPRINKLER LOCATIONS ARE NOT INDICATED.
9. ALL INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD FRAMING U.N.O.
10. FIRE STOPPING MATERIAL FOR NON-FERROUS PIPE, CONDUIT AND
OTHER SYNTHETIC MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH EACH
OTHER.
11. PENETRATION OF SMOKE BARRIERS AND PARTITIONS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH AND APPROVED FIRE/SMOKE SYSTEM OF A MINIMUM OF
1 HOUR FIRE RATED MATERIALS WHICH HAVE BEEN TESTED AND
APPROVED BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TESTING MATERIALS (ASTM)
E 814.
12. CABINET WIDTH DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY AND MUST
BE FIELD VERIFIED.
13. MAX. HEIGHT OF OUTLETS ON KITCHEN COUNTERS TO BE 44". OTHER
OUTLETS MUST BE A MIN. OF 15" OFF FLOOR TO A MAX. OF 48" UNLESS
LOCATED IN ADA ACCESSIBLE ROOMS.
14. PROVIDE GRAB BAR BLOCKING AT ALL ADA UNITS.
15. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS AND ADDITIONAL
DETAILS.
16. ALL TOPPING SLABS MUST BE POURED AFTER ROOF IS COMPLETE AND
THE BUILDING IS DRIED IN.
17. PROVIDE FULL HEIGHT CORNER GUARDS AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS.
ROOM TYPE MATRIX
UNIT TYPE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 TOTAL
KING 6 6 7 19
KING SUITE CONNECTOR
- 1 - 1
- 6 8 14
QUEEN QUEEN
- 1 - 1
QUEEN QUEEN CONNTECTOR
3 8 8 19
1 - - 1
QUEEN QUEEN XL ENTRY - 3 3 6
1 - - 1ADA KING
- 1 - 1
ADA QUEEN QUEEN - 1 - 1
- - 1 1
ADA LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 TOTAL
MOBILITY FEATURES
(ACCESSIBLE)
1 2 1 4
COMMUNICATION FEATURES
(HEARING IMPAIRED)
2 3 2 7
ADA KING SUITE
ADA QUEEN QUEEN SUITE
KING SUITE
KING WIDE
QUEEN QUEEN SUITE - 1 1 2
11 28 28 67TOTALS
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
5 4 3 267811910121514131617
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
1
15
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
4'-
1
0
1
/
4
"
2'
-
0
"
2'
-
2
"
44
'
-
2
"
5.4 3.27.8
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
5432 6 7 8 11910 12 151413 16 17
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
1
2'
-
2
"
2'
-
0
"
4'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
44
'
-
2
"
5.43.2 7.8
THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY
OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR
REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON
DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C.
©
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
#
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
OWNER:
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
P: 801.355.6868
F: 801.355.6880
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
CONSULTANT:
2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
PROJECT:
SHEET #
BY
M
A
R
R
I
O
T
T
DATE DESCRIPTION
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
#
P.
O
.
B
O
X
2
0
7
FL
A
G
S
T
A
F
F
,
A
Z
8
6
0
0
2
03/15/19 REZONE APP.
12
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
9
2
:
4
9
:
4
4
P
M
C:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
\
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
1
8
-
1
8
4
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
I
n
n
F
ou
n
t
a
i
n
H
i
l
l
s
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
V
1
9
_
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
.
r
v
t
A2
0
0
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
18
-18
4
.
0
1
EL
RH
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
I
N
N
&
S
U
I
T
E
S
96
3
7
N
O
R
T
H
S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
FO
U
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
,
A
Z
8
5
2
6
8
CH
A
L
E
T
,
I
N
C
.
RE
Z
O
N
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION
SHEET NOTESXXXX
GENERAL NOTES
1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
2. REFER TO DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES FOR MORE INFORMATION.
3. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL CONNECT DIRECTLY TO STORM SEWER
4. CUSTOM COLORS ARE SELECTED AND SHALL BE FACTORY APPLIED.
SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES OF ALL SIDING PRODUCTS TO ARCHITECT
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
EXTERIOR FINISH KEY
EFIS - PRIMARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
COMET 1628
EFIS - SECONDARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
NOVEMBER RAIN 2142-60
EFIS - TERTIARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60
FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ILLUMINATION COLOR
MATCH TO BENJAMIN MOORE MIDNIGHT OIL 1631
FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ROUGH SAWN, TABACCO
EXTERIOR PAINTED STEEL, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60
METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60
METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
MIDNIGHT OIL 1631
EF-1
EF-2
EF-3
S-1
S-2
PT-1
MT-1
MT-2
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
HKSR EP CF
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
2'
-
2
"
2'
-
0
"
4'-
1
0
1
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
44
'
-
2
"
ABDGNTQ
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
H K SREPCMF
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
2'
-
2
"
2'
-
0
"
4'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
0
"
44
'
-
2
"
35
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
WUABDGLNTV XQ
16
'
-
4
1
/
8
"
THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY
OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR
REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON
DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C.
©
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
#
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
OWNER:
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
P: 801.355.6868
F: 801.355.6880
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
CONSULTANT:
2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
PROJECT:
SHEET #
BY
M
A
R
R
I
O
T
T
DATE DESCRIPTION
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
#
P.
O
.
B
O
X
2
0
7
FL
A
G
S
T
A
F
F
,
A
Z
8
6
0
0
2
03/15/19 REZONE APP.
12
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
9
2
:
4
9
:
4
8
P
M
C:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
\
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
1
8
-
1
8
4
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
I
n
n
F
ou
n
t
a
i
n
H
i
l
l
s
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
V
1
9
_
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
.
r
v
t
A2
0
1
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
18
-18
4
.
0
1
EL
RH
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
I
N
N
&
S
U
I
T
E
S
96
3
7
N
O
R
T
H
S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
FO
U
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
,
A
Z
8
5
2
6
8
CH
A
L
E
T
,
I
N
C
.
RE
Z
O
N
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION
SHEET NOTES
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION
XXXX
GENERAL NOTES
1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS
2. REFER TO DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES FOR MORE INFORMATION.
3. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL CONNECT DIRECTLY TO STORM SEWER
4. CUSTOM COLORS ARE SELECTED AND SHALL BE FACTORY APPLIED.
SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES OF ALL SIDING PRODUCTS TO ARCHITECT
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
EXTERIOR FINISH KEY
EFIS - PRIMARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
COMET 1628
EFIS - SECONDARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
NOVEMBER RAIN 2142-60
EFIS - TERTIARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60
FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ILLUMINATION COLOR
MATCH TO BENJAMIN MOORE MIDNIGHT OIL 1631
FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ROUGH SAWN, TABACCO
EXTERIOR PAINTED STEEL, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60
METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60
METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE
MIDNIGHT OIL 1631
EF-1
EF-2
EF-3
S-1
S-2
PT-1
MT-1
MT-2
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
5432 6 7 8 11910 12 151413 16 17
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
1
2'-
0
"
4'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
44
'
-
2
"
5.43.2 7.8
EF-2 EF-2 EF-2 EF-2EF-1 EF-1 EF-1ST-1
ST-1
ST-1
ST-1 ST-1 ST-1
ST-2 ST-2
ST-2ST-2ST-2
ST-2
ST-2
ST-2
MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1
MT-1
MT-1
MT-2
MT-2 MT-2 MT-2
MT-2 MT-2MT-2 MT-2
MT-1
ST-2
EF-1EF-1
MT-2 MT-2 MT-2
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
5 4 3 267811910121514131617
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
1
15
'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
4'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
2'
-
0
"
2'
-
2
"
44
'
-
2
"
5.4 3.27.8
1'-0"
ST-2
ST-1
MT-1
EF-1 EF-2 EF-1
MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 EF-2
EF-1 EF-1
MT-1 MT-1 MT-1EF-2
ST-2
ST-1
MT-1MT-2
ST-2
ST-2
ST-2 ST-2
ST-2
MT-1
MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2
EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH SHERMAN WILLAIMS 6675 -
GARRET GRAY
EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH MATCH SHERMAN
WILLIAMS 6385 - DOVER WHITE
ELDORADO STONE - MARQUEE 24 - DOVETAIL
ELDORADO STONE - RIDGETOP 18 - WHISPER WHITE
EF-1
EF-2
S-1
S-2
EXTERIOR FINISH KEY
T-GROOVE FLUSH JOINT CORTEN AZP PAINTED METAL PANELMT-1
DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM PANELMT-2
THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY
OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR
REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON
DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C.
©
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
#
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
OWNER:
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
P: 801.355.6868
F: 801.355.6880
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
CONSULTANT:
2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
PROJECT:
SHEET #
BY
M
A
R
R
I
O
T
T
DATE DESCRIPTION
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
#
P.
O
.
B
O
X
2
0
7
FL
A
G
S
T
A
F
F
,
A
Z
8
6
0
0
2
03/15/19 REZONE APP.
12
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
9
2
:
5
1
:
4
0
P
M
C:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
\
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
1
8
-
1
8
4
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
I
n
n
F
ou
n
t
a
i
n
H
i
l
l
s
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
V
1
9
_
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
.
r
v
t
A2
0
2
CO
L
O
R
E
D
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
18
-18
4
.
0
1
EL
RH
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
I
N
N
&
S
U
I
T
E
S
96
3
7
N
O
R
T
H
S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
FO
U
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
,
A
Z
8
5
2
6
8
CH
A
L
E
T
,
I
N
C
.
RE
Z
O
N
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SSOUTH ELEVATION - COLOR
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION - COLOR
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
HKSR EP CF
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
2'
-
2
"
2'
-
0
"
4'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
44
'
-
2
"
ABDGNTQ
EF-2
ST-1
ST-2
MT-1
ST-1
ST-2
EF-1 MT-1
ST-2
MT-2 MT-2
MT-1
LEVEL 1
0' -0"
LEVEL 2
15' -0"
LEVEL 3
26' -1 3/4"
H K SREPCMF
TRUSS BEARING 1
35' -1 3/4"
LOW PARAPET 1
40' -0"
MID PARAPET1
42' -0"
HIGH PARAPET 1
44' -2"
2'
-
2
"
2'
-
0
"
4'
-
1
0
1
/
4
"
9'
-
0
"
11
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
15
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
1
3
/
4
"
44
'
-
2
"
WUABDGLNTV XQ
ST-2
ST-2
ST-2
EF-1EF-2 MT-1 MT-1 EF-2 MT-1
EF-1
EF-1ST-2
ST-2
ST-2
MT-2
MT-2 MT-2
MT-2
ST-1
ST-2
ST-1
MT-2
MT-2 MT-2
MT-2
ST-1
ST-2
16
'
-
4
1
/
8
"
EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH SHERMAN WILLAIMS 6675 -
GARRET GRAY
EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH MATCH SHERMAN
WILLIAMS 6385 - DOVER WHITE
ELDORADO STONE - MARQUEE 24 - DOVETAIL
ELDORADO STONE - RIDGETOP 18 - WHISPER WHITE
EF-1
EF-2
S-1
S-2
EXTERIOR FINISH KEY
T-GROOVE FLUSH JOINT CORTEN AZP PAINTED METAL PANELMT-1
DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM PANELMT-2
THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY
OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR
REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON
DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C.
©
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
#
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
OWNER:
510 South 600 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
P: 801.355.6868
F: 801.355.6880
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
CONSULTANT:
2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED
PROJECT:
SHEET #
BY
M
A
R
R
I
O
T
T
DATE DESCRIPTION
THE
RICHARDSON
DESIGN
PARTNERSHIP,
L.L.C.
#
P.
O
.
B
O
X
2
0
7
FL
A
G
S
T
A
F
F
,
A
Z
8
6
0
0
2
03/15/19 REZONE APP.
12
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
9
2
:
5
2
:
0
6
P
M
C:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
\
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
1
8
-
1
8
4
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
I
n
n
F
ou
n
t
a
i
n
H
i
l
l
s
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
V
1
9
_
j
v
a
n
n
o
o
r
d
.
r
v
t
A2
0
3
CO
L
O
R
E
D
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
18
-18
4
.
0
1
EL
RH
FA
I
R
F
I
E
L
D
I
N
N
&
S
U
I
T
E
S
96
3
7
N
O
R
T
H
S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
FO
U
N
T
A
I
N
H
I
L
L
S
,
A
Z
8
5
2
6
8
CH
A
L
E
T
,
I
N
C
.
RE
Z
O
N
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - COLOR
1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION - COLOR
From:
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Fwd: Zoning Meeting
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:11:21 PM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ole Umpa <Date: February 6, 2020 at 1:38:06 PM MSTTo: " >Subject: Zoning Meeting
We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch
oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land
adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2.
Please know that We / Myself do not approve
and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z
Board that the Zoning not be changed.
Name:Robert Nicol
Unit#
pzc@fh.az.gov
From:Joanne Case
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Monterra Ranch / Rezoning Meeting 2/13/2020
Date:Wednesday, February 5, 2020 6:22:02 PM
Importance:High
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
To Mr. Wesley and the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission:
I own and reside in a unit located in Monterra Ranch. Without a doubt, I highly oppose therezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know thatI do not approve of this proposal. I am requesting that the Zoning not be changed. I willattend the zoning meeting on 2/13/2020 to voice my opposition.
Thank you for your time.
Joanne Case Unit Monterra Ranch
From:Ole Umpa
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Monterra Ranch
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:09:50 AM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
As a Owner in Monterra Ranch we feel rezoning the parcel of land next to Monterra Ranch from C1 to C2
is terrible idea.
People invested their money and checked out the zoning of that parcel before they bought.
Views of the landscape around F.H.is one main attraction people buy in our city.
Please put yourselves in these owners shoes and now, you are starring at a wall with Windows in it while
sitting on your patio.Great! I think the resale of these units will go down for these owners.
I Would be in favor keeping the height restriction of C1 the same as any other zoning that would be
considered.Also if the parking lot would be next to the wall of Monterra Ranch,I think that might work.
I hope the above suggestions will be brought up as a viable option that could work for everyone.
THANK you, Ron & Gloria Luepke
Owners of unit
Monterra Ranch
From:Ole Umpa
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Opposition
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 7:56:49 AM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the
rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra
Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do
not approve and follow with a recommendation to the
P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed.
Steve Smith Unit
Owner for 9 years
From:Matalynne Wandel
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Re February 13, 2020 meeting on property adjacent to Monterra Ranch
Date:Wednesday, February 5, 2020 7:28:00 PM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission:
As owners of Monterra Ranch, we oppose the rezoning of the parcel of land adjacent to
Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that we do not approve and follow with a
recommendation to the P&Z Board that the zoning NOT be changed.
Thank you,
Matalynne and Herbert Wandel
Unit
Monterra Ranch
From:Karyn Brown
To:Rudy
Cc:PZC (Commission)
Subject:RE: Monterra Ranch Owners - Pending Zoning Case
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:13:15 AM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
Good Morning:
We just sent our notice. We think that the address
below should be corrected to pzc@fh.az.gov.
Thanks,
Karyn & Greg Brown
Unit
From: Rudy
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 2:49 PM
To: Rudy
Subject: Monterra Ranch Owners - Pending Zoning Case
To the Owners of Property at Monterra Ranch: As you
know the Planning and Zoning Commission are going to
be voting on a change to the zoning of the property
adjacent to Monterra Ranch for the building of a 3 story
Hotel. I am sending you this with the hope that you would
copy and send it to the Zoning Board before the Feb.
13th meeting.
To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commision,
We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the
rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra
Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do
not approve and follow with a recommendation to the
P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed.
Website : pzc@fh.az.go
Your Name:
Unit #:
Monterra Ranch
Thank You if you have questions please feel free to
email myself,
Steve Smith Unit
Board Vice Pres. at
From:Karyn Brown
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Rezoning from C-1 to C-2 of Parcel APN#176-10-805
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:09:02 AM
Importance:High
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
Importance: High
To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commision,
We the owners of Monterra Ranch, Unit 47, oppose the
rezoning of the parcel of land adjacent to Monterra
Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that we do not
approve and recommend that the zoning not be
changed.
Gregory and Karyn Brown
Monterra Ranch Condominiums
N. Monterey Dr. Unit
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
From:FRANCIS UCHO
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Re-zoning of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:16:26 PM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
I am strongly opposed to the proposed
rezoning of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from C-1 to C-2
Submitted by Frank Ucho Owner and resident Unit Monterrra Ranch N. Monterey DrFountain Hills
From:Ole Umpa
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Zoning Meeting
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:17:30 AM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have
verified the sender and know the content is safe.
To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commision,
We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the
rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra
Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do
not approve and follow with a recommendation to the
P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed.
Your Name: Diane Powers
Unit #:
Monterra Ranch
From:Maggie Olmschenk
To:PZC (Commission)
Subject:Zoning Case
Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:31:34 PM
This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified
the sender and know the content is safe.
To the members of the planning and zoning commission
We/myself the owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranchfrom a C1 to C2. Please know that We/Mysel do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Boardthat the Zoning not be changed.Margaret OlmschenkUnit Monterra Ranch
ORDINANCE NO. 20-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
DISTRICT MAPS OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.62
ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAGUARO BOULEVARD
NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH SAGUARO
BOULEVARD AND EAST SHEA BOULEVARD (AKA 9637 NORTH
SAGUAGO BOULEVARD; APN#176-10-805) FROM C-1 –
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL ZONING
DISTRICT TO C-2 – INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL ZONING
DISTRICT.
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town”) adopted Ordinance No. 93-22, on
November 18, 1993, adopting the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fountain Hills (the
“Zoning Ordinance”); and
WHEREAS, Chapter 2, Procedures, Section 2.01, Amendments or Zone Changes, of
the Zoning Ordinance establishes the authority and procedures for amending the zoning
district boundaries; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV.
STAT. § 9-462.04, public hearings were advertised in the January 29, 2020 and the
February 5, 2020 editions of the Times of Fountain Hills;
WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning
Commission on February 13, 2020, and by the Mayor and Council of the Town of
Fountain Hills on March 17, 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows:
SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The approximately 1.62 acre parcel of real property located at 9637 N
Saguaro Blvd., as more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is rezoned from “C-1 – Neighborhood
Commercial and Professional Zoning District” to "C-2 – Intermediate Commercial
Zoning District.”
SECTION 3. That rezoning is adopted subject to the following conditions:
2
1. Planting and maintenance of trees along the north property line of a species
that will grow to a height of at least 25-feet and spaced to provide a solid
screen along the property line. The trees when planted shall be a minimum
10-foot tall, 36-inch box tree.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. Approval of the C-2 zoning is conditioned on development of the project
commencing within one year of the effective date of this Ordinance.
1. Prior to the expiration of the one-year time condition, the property owner or
authorized representative may submit an application for an extension to the
Town. A submittal of an application for extension of the one-year time condition
does not toll the running of the time condition. Should the one-year time condition
expire between the submittal of an application for a time extension and the public
hearing on the requested extension, the C-2 zoning designation shall be subject
to reversion as set forth below. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the
Town’s Zoning Administrator shall submit the request to the Town Council for
consideration at a public hearing held as set forth below.
2. The Town Council shall, after notices via certified mail to the property owner and
authorized representative have been provided at least 15 days prior to the date
of the scheduled hearing, hold a public hearing on the extension request. The
Town Council may, in its sole discretion, grant an extension of the time condition,
subject to the limitation on the number of extensions set forth below. If the public
hearing is held after expiration of the time condition, the Town Council may also,
at that public hearing, take action to revert the zoning on the property to its prior
zoning classification.
3. In the event the project has not commenced within the one-year time period and
no request for time extension has been received as provided above, the Zoning
Administrator may submit the C-2 – Intermediate Commercial zoning designation
of the subject property to the Town Council for consideration of reversion,
pursuant to the hearing procedure set forth below.
4. The Zoning Administrator shall notify the property owner and authorized
representative by certified mail of the Town Council’s intention to hold a hearing
to determine compliance with the one-year time condition, and to revert the
zoning on the property to its former classification if the condition is determined by
the Town Council to have not been met. All such notices shall be made at least
15 days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing. The Town Council may, in its
sole discretion, either grant an extension of the time condition, subject to the
3
limitation on the number of extensions set forth below, or revert the zoning on the
property to its prior zoning classification.
5. The Town Council may grant up to two one-year extensions of the time condition.
6. Following the commencement of the project, the Zoning Administrator shall
monitor the project to ensure it continues to completion. Upon the Zoning
Administrator’s initial determination that the project is not being actively pursued,
no further review or approval of any project site plan or plat shall occur until it is
determined that good cause exists for delay in the construction of the project.
Should the project fail to proceed, a public hearing shall be held by the Town
Council to determine the cause of the delay. At the public hearing on the matter,
if the Town Council determines that there is not good cause for the delay, it may
impose additional conditions on the property owner to ensure compliance. If such
additional conditions are not met, the Zoning Administrator may set the matter for
public hearing, according to the process set forth in subsection above, on a
possible reversion from C-2 – Intermediate Commercial zoning to C-1 –
Neighborhood Commercial and Professional zoning.
7. For purposes of this Section, the terms “commence,” “commencing” and
“commencement” shall mean physical vertical construction activity in accordance
with a valid building permit issued by the Town.
SECTION 6. The Mayor, the Town Manager, the Town Clerk and the Town Attorney are
hereby authorized and directed to execute all documents and take all steps necessary to
carry out the purpose and intent of this Ordinance.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
4
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain
Hills, Arizona, this 17th day of March, 2020.
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO:
Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Burke, Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney
Grady Miller, Town Manager Town Attorney