Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDApacket__02-13-20_0508_30       NOTICE OF MEETING REGULAR MEETING FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION      Chairman Erik Hansen  Vice Chairman Peter Gray Commissioner Mathew Boik Commissioner Clayton Corey Commissioner Susan Demptster Commissioner Dan Kovacevic Commissioner Scott Schlossberg      TIME:6:00 P.M. – REGULAR MEETING WHEN:THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2020 WHERE:FOUNTAIN HILLS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ Commissioners of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a quorum of the Town’s Council,  various Commission, Committee or Board members may be in attendance at the Commission meeting. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions, parents have a right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions make a video or audio recording of a minor child. Meetings of the Commission are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result, proceedings in which children are present may be subject to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise their rights may either file written consent with the Town Clerk to such recording, or take personal action to ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may be made. If a child is present at the time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9 have been waived.    REQUEST TO COMMENT   The public is welcome to participate in Commission meetings. TO SPEAK TO AN AGENDA ITEM, please complete a Request to Comment card, located in the back of the Council Chambers, and hand it to the Executive Assistant prior to discussion of that item, if possible. Include the agenda item on which you wish to comment. Speakers will be allowed three contiguous minutes to address the Commission. Verbal comments should be directed through the Presiding Officer and not to individual Commissioners. TO COMMENT ON AN AGENDA ITEM IN WRITING ONLY, please complete a Request to Comment card, indicating it is a written comment, and check the box on whether you are FOR or AGAINST and agenda item, and hand it to the Executive Assistant prior to discussion, if possible.   REGULAR MEETING    REGULAR MEETING        1.CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE – Chairman Hansen     2.ROLL CALL – Chairman Hansen     3.CALL TO THE PUBLIC Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the agenda. Any such comment (i) must be within the jurisdiction of the Commission, and (ii) is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The Commission will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during Call to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion of the Call to the Public, individual commissioners may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or (iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Commission agenda.     4.CONSIDERATION OF for approving the Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting minutes from January 23, 2020.      5.CONSIDERATION OF rezoning approximately 1.62 acres located north of the northeast corner of N. Saguaro Boulevard and E. Shea Boulevard (AKA 9637 N. Saguaro Boulevard; APN # 176-10-805) from C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and Professional Zoning District to C-2, Intermediate Commercial Zoning District.  (Case Z2019-04)     6.COMMISSION DISCUSSION/REQUEST FOR RESEARCH to staff.    7.SUMMARY OF COMMISSION REQUESTS from Development Services Director.    8.REPORT from Development Services Director.    9.ADJOURNMENT       CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted in accordance with the statement filed by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the Town Clerk. Dated this ______ day of ____________________, 2020. _____________________________________________  Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant   The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call 480-816-5199 (voice) or    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2020 2 of 3   The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call 480-816-5199 (voice) or 1-800-367-8939 (TDD) 48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain agenda information in large print format. Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the Commission with this agenda are available for review in the Development Services' Office.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2020 3 of 3   ITEM 4. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/13/2020 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services Prepared by: Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant Staff Contact Information: Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION OF for approving the Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting minutes from January 23, 2020.  Staff Summary (Background) The intent of approving previous meeting minutes os to ensure an accurate account of the discussion and action that took place at that meeting archival purposes.  Approved minutes are placed on the Town's website in compliance with state law.  Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle N/A Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) Approval Staff Recommendation(s) Approval SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to Approve the Planning and Zoning Commission regular meeting minutes dated January 23, 2020. Attachments Minutes  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Development Services Director John Wesley 02/06/2020 03:06 PM Form Started By: Paula Woodward Started On: 02/06/2020 02:05 PM Final Approval Date: 02/06/2020  PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2020 PAGE 1 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 23, 2020 CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Chairman Erik Hansen Chairman Hansen called the meeting of January 23, 2020 to order at 6:00 p.m. 1. MOMENT OF SILENCE – Chairman Erik Hansen 2. ROLL CALL — Chairman Erik Hansen COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Erik Hansen; Commissioners, Mathew Boik, Clayton Corey, Dan Kovacevic and Scott Schlossberg. Vice Chairman Peter Gray was absent. STAFF PRESENT: Development Services Director John Wesley and Executive Assistant Paula Woodward. 3. CALL TO THE PUBLIC None. Pursuant to ARS. 38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the agenda. Any such comment (I) must be within the jurisdiction of the Planning and Zoning Commission and (ii) is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The Planning and Zoning Commission will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during "Call to the Public" unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion of the Call to the Public, individual commissioners may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or (iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Planning and Zoning Commission agenda. 4. CONSIDERATION of approving the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated December 12, 2019. Commissioner Corey MOVED to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission dated December 12, 2019; Commissioner Dempster SECONDED: passed unanimously. 5. CONSIDERATION OF Ordinance 20-03 amending Chapter 12, Commercial Zoning Districts, by adding a new provision to Section 12.02 B., to allow indoor vehicle sales and rentals in the C-1 zoning district. Chairman Hansen opened the public hearing at 6:02 p.m. Mr. Wesley reviewed the application request for a text amendment to the Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 12, Commercial Zoning Districts, Section 12.02 B, adding a new subsection (12.02 B.4.) allowing new and used vehicle sales in the C-1 zoning district and establishing criteria for the use. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2020 PAGE 2 Mr. Wesley explained that staff has meet with the applicant over the past few months regarding proposed indoor vehicle sales including motorcycles at the Vets Auto Center. The vehicles would be sold on consignment to raise money for the Veterans of Foreign War Organization (VFW). The center is located in a C-1 zoning district that does not allow for more intense uses such as vehicle sales. After review, it was decided that a text amendment was a better choice than rezoning the property since it is surrounded by residential. C-1 zoning is intended to be that transition from more active commercial to residential district. It is designed to be close to a residential area without negative impact. The C-1 district allows for commercial sales activities (indoors) such as bookstores, hardware stores and pharmacies. In addition to the large auto malls, the car industries is shifting such as indoor lots and displays, for example; Tesla and Carvanna. To lessen the impact of vehicle sales in a C-1 zoning district the applicant agreed to indoor sales only, no service activities, limit the square footage and hours of operation. Mr. Wesley said commission feedback is necessary regarding the size and hours of operation. The applicate is present for questions. Mr. Wesley said that he was comfortable with the approval provided the hours and size are clarified. In response to Commissioner Boik, Mr. Wesley said that the C-1 zoning districts are along the Shea corridor, Saguaro Blvd. near Panama, Glenbrook and Fountain Hills Blvd. and the West Shea area near Fry’s. Commissioner Corey confirmed the applicant owned the proposed building for the indoor car sales. Commissioner Corey asked how the cars would be brought into the building. The applicant and building owner, Vladimir Buer said that there were many glass panels on the building. The HOA allowed the removal of the glass panels and replacement with doors. The doors are large enough to allow cars to enter and exit the showroom. Mr. Buer said he contacted the other building tenants and they are in agreement with the indoor vehicle sales. In response to Commissioner Dempster, Mr. Buer said that he owns the property along Monterey and up to the next building. There are 12 parking spaces in one area and 40 plus on another area. The vehicle display area would be indoor only. As far as the noise, there is a concrete wall between the parking area and the residential area. The parking area is used now and there have not been any compliants about noise. Commissioner Kovacevic asked if other than vehicles would be sold to raise money at this location. Mr. Buer said that this location is for motorcycle and vehicle sales. They are donated or sold on consignment. There may come a time that an auction would take place once a quarter. In response to Commissioner Kovacevic, Mr. Wesley said there are certain parking requirement that go along with auto sales. Typically, in a joint use such as this, it is assumed the parking is set up to go along with mixed use. The Tractor Supply is zoned C-2 and the Target Center is zoned C- 2 PUD. Commissioner Kovacevic asked how many cars would be on display. Mr. Buer said the showroom would support 12 to 15 vehicles. There are 12 covered parking spaces in the back. Five of those are designated for this operation. Commissioner Corey expressed concern regarding if there are more cars than can be display at any given time. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2020 PAGE 3 Mr. Wesley said that to some degree this would be a code enforcement issue. It would be expected the covered parking spaces might be used temporary while cars are shifted around. Commissioner Schlossberg asked for details regarding the on-site auction. Mr. Buer said the on-site auctions would be held quarterly. The auctions would most likely take place on a Saturday during a limited timeframe. The auction would take place inside. If the vehicles do not pass a safety inspection, they are not displayed. Non-running vehicles or those that do not pass safety inspections, are picked up by a contract company from the donor. The contractor makes a donation to the VFW. The maximum number of cars inside will be 12- 15 cars. Mr. Wesley reminded the commission that all C-1 zoning would be affected by this text amendment change. Discussion took place regarding the restrictions of a C-1 zoning and C-2 zoning. Chairman Hansen said that the idea is for this business to operate and look like a retail store rather than an auto sales lot. Chairman Hansen asked the commission what comments they had regarding hours of operation and the size of the business. The Commission agreed that although the C-1 zoning allows a business to stay open until 11 p.m., this might not be a good idea with a residential neighborhood so close. They agreed on a closing time of 9 p.m., seven days a week. Commissioner Dempster added that there be no overnight parking. No one from the public wished to speak. Chairman Hansen closed the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. Commissioner Corey MOVED to recommend an approval to the Town Council for Ordinance 20- 30 amending Chapter 12, Commercial Zoning Districts, by adding a new provision to Section 12.02 B., to allow indoor vehicle sales and rentals in the C-1 zoning district with the following stipulations; no overnight parking, maximum business size is 5,000 square feet and the business must close at 9 p.m., 7 days a week. Case Z2019-09; Commissioner Schlossberg SECONDED: passed unanimously. 6. COMMISSION DISCUSSION/REQUEST FOR RESEARCH to staff. None 7. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION REQUESTS from Development Services Director. None 8. REPORT from Development Services Director. Mr. Wesley confirmed that the Planning and Zoning Commission would met once a month on the second Monday of the month. The new schedule begins March 9, 2020. The caveat would be if there were a case that could not wait for a regular meeting; a special meeting would take place. The town manager is supportive and the town council has been notified. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES January 23, 2020 PAGE 4 Mr. Wesley informed the commission they each have a copy of the General Plan Update 2020 in front of them. The 60-day review period begins when these are sent out to all the agencies. There is a stakeholders meeting on February 26, 2020, in the Council Chambers, 6:30 p.m. The Genreal Plan Update 2020 will be on the Planning and Zoning Commissions March agenda. This will allow for any public and commission feedback. The Planning and Zoning Commission’s April meeting will be the official public hearing with recommendation to council. Council is scheduled to take action at their May meeting. Town Council will vote at their June meeting. 9. ADJOURNMENT. The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission held December 12, 2019, adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Town of Fountain Hills Erik Hansen, Chairman ATTEST AND PREPARED BY: Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Session held by the Planning and Zoning Commission of Fountain Hills in the Fountain Hills Council Chambers on the 23rd day of January 2020. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 3rd of February 2020. Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE ITEM 5. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/13/2020 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services Prepared by: John Wesley, Development Services Director Staff Contact Information: John Wesley, Development Services Director Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION OF rezoning approximately 1.62 acres located north of the northeast corner of N. Saguaro Boulevard and E. Shea Boulevard (AKA 9637 N. Saguaro Boulevard; APN # 176-10-805) from C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and Professional Zoning District to C-2, Intermediate Commercial Zoning District.  (Case Z2019-04) Staff Summary (Background) This request is to rezone the vacant property north of the northeast corner of Shea and Saguaro Boulevards from C-1 to C-2.  The intended purpose for the property is the construction of a three-story, 66 room hotel. This property has been zoned C-1 since the start of Fountain Hills.  The surrounding property to the south, east, and west has also been zoned C-1.  All of this property, except for the site now planned for a hospital, has been developed with a variety of retail and office uses.  The property immediately north was originally zoned C-1 but was rezoned to R-5 in 1986 for the development of Monterra Ranch. General Plan The land use designation for this area is C/R - General Commercial/Retail.  The stated intent for this designation is to provide for the "sale of convenience goods (food, drugs and sundries) and personal services that meet the daily needs of a multi-neighborhood trade area." The Vision statement in the Land Use Element is: A Town that seeks to preserve its character and beauty using land use principles that allow development in a cohesive and beneficial manner to protect neighborhoods and support business development." Land Use element Goals and Objectives that relate to this specific request include:  Objective 2.1  The Town should continue to employ a policy to encourage the overall development of existing commercially zoned lands and the renovation of underutilized commercial building. Objective 3.2  The Town should study issues and implement solutions related to infill, revitalization, and redevelopment of the commercial land and existing uses along Shea Boulevard and Saguaro Boulevard. Goal Five:  Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent land uses. Zoning Pattern Typical zoning patterns place the most intense zoning and land uses at major arterial intersections and along major streets and then step down to less intense zones and uses to provide buffers and transitions to residential areas.  The C-1 and CC zoning districts are the least intense commercial zoning districts in the Town.  The C-2 District is more intense in terms of some of the uses allowed (e.g. auto repair, bars, drive-in restaurants, liquor stores, etc.) and in terms of allowing stores to operate 24 hours a day (C-1 and CC are restricted to hours from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m.). A request was made last year to rezone the property across Saguaro to the west from C-1 to C-2.  There was significant neighborhood opposition to this request and it was denied by Council.  Chief concerns in that case was the more intense uses that could happen in close proximity to the adjacent single residence neighborhood. Planned Use As shown in the attached illustrations, the request for the C-2 zoning district has been made due to the desire to construct a 3-story hotel on the property; this use is not allowed in the C-1 district.  Section 2.01 B 1 b of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a tentative development plan be submitted with each rezoning application.  A final site plan will be submitted for staff review and approval at a later date prior to submission of construction drawings.  While this tentative development plan gives an idea of how the property owner is planning to use the land at this time, this development plan does not impose any restrictions on the ultimate use of the property.  For any reason the property ownership could change, or the current owner could change their mind and decide to use the property for any of the other uses allowed in the approved zoning district. Analysis This area has been planned and zoned for commercial uses since the founding of Fountain Hills.  Most of the area has been developed and used for a variety of commercial activities for many years, this is one of few lots remaining to be developed. The General Plan recognizes that the area of Shea and Saguaro Boulevards is under transition and a good place to locate a mix of office, retail, entertainment, and residential uses.  Given the proximity to the SR 87 Highway, this is a good location attract and serve both local and regional needs.  C-2 zoning has been introduced into the area at the Tractor Supply and at the Target Center. The General Plan supports the idea of developing the tourism industry in Fountain Hills.  Hotels can be a good revenue generator for the Town from both the taxes on the hotel stay and any purchases that take place in the Town during a hotel stay.  The applicant reports that current hotels in Fountain Hills have an annual occupancy rate around 75%, which is high and shows some demand in the market for additional hotel rooms.  This average comes from nearly 100% occupancy in the prime season and around 50% in the off season.  Hotel rooms are currently under construction at CopperWynd and the Lakeshore Hotel is being renovated. As part of the rezoning application, staff asked the applicant for a traffic impact analysis.  That analysis reviewed a wide range of commercial uses that could result from C-2 zoning, not just the impact of the proposed hotel.  That analysis did not show any adverse impact on the adjacent streets due to the development of this property with C-2 uses. Of primary consideration in review of this request to rezone from C-1 to C-2 is the General Plan Land Use Goal Five which states: "Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent land uses."  Development of C-2 uses on this property could negatively impact the adjacent residential property.  As stated previously, the Council has recently denied C-2 across Saguaro due to concerns from the adjacent neighborhood with the potential impact C-2 uses.  In that case the adjacent properties are zoned and developed with single-family uses and the street pattern allows direct access from the commercial activities into the residential neighborhood.  In this case, the adjacent property is zoned for multi-family uses and the property is developed with attached single-family homes and there will be no direct street access from the commercial area into the neighborhood.    Potential impacts still exist, however, in terms of the lights, noise, and activity that can occur with C-2 uses, including a hotel.  One significant difference between the C-1 and C-2 zoning districts is the height allowed.  In the C-1 District the maximum height is 25'; in the C-2 it is 40'.  However, the setback from the adjacent residential use increases with the building height (setback must at least 40 feet for the proposed 40' tall hotel).  Also of concern are the hours of operation.  People who purchased property and live in Monterra Ranch did so with the existing commercial development being closed at night.  Rezoning to C-2 will allow 24-hour operations.  The nature of the uses also become more intense with the additionally allowed uses, primarily drive-thrus being a use by right. Many of these impacts can be addressed through site and building design.  In this case, the applicant has tried to mitigate impacts by designing the hotel with the entry on the opposite side from the residences and including significant landscaping along the north property line.  While the site plan provided is a "tentative development plan" and other site plans could be provided in the future for any use allowed in the C-2 zoning district, stipulations could be included on the approval of the zoning to ensure whatever development occurs provides the buffers and transitions needed to mitigate any negative impacts of the development.  The attached draft ordinance includes a stipulation for a landscape buffer of trees along the north property line.  Additional stipulations could be added. The tentative development plan includes an access drive around the north side of the building to provide emergency access for the fire department.  This results in the trees planted along the north property line not having a lot of room.  There is a concern with the Willow Acacia trees being shown.  The trees are shown to be planted just a few feet from the north property line. The radius of the mature tree is about 20'.  This will put significant portions of the tree canopy into the rear yards of the adjoining residential properties.  Any tree that is tall enough (at least 20' tall) to provide screening of the hotel and prevent people in the hotel from looking into the homes, would have this same issue. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle General Plan Chapter 3 - Land Use Element Zoning Ordinance Chapter 12 - Commercial Zoning Districts Risk Analysis N/A N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) While the proposed use as a hotel on this property has been designed in a manner to significantly reduce the potential negative impacts, staff has concerns with the introduction of a 40' tall building in this location and impacts that come with the C-2 zoning district.    Approval at this location would set a precedent for similar zoning of adjacent properties.  Therefore, staff recommends denial of the requested rezoning. Should the Commission determine rezoning to C-2 is appropriate for this location, a draft ordinance is attached.  The draft ordinance include one stipulation related to trees along the north property line that could be used to mitigate the current use and any other uses that might be proposed for the property.  Additional stipulations could be added should the Commission identify other key development standards that would be important for this or other uses on the property to address potential impacts. The draft ordinance also includes a procedure for reverting the zoning back to C-1 should the property owner not proceed with the hotel in a timely manner.  This could be included in the recommendation to Council or deleted if the Commission determines it is not necessary. SUGGESTED MOTION Staff will help the Commission draft a motion as necessary. Attachments Vicinity Map  Application  Submittal Documents  Letters  Draft Ordinance  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Development Services Director (Originator)John Wesley 02/06/2020 03:04 PM Form Started By: John Wesley Started On: 01/21/2020 02:32 PM Final Approval Date: 02/06/2020  FAIRFIELD INN SUITES 3 STORY 67 GUESTROOMS SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK 19'-0" 9'-0"5'-0"11'-0" 19'-0" 24'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 24'-0" 19'-0" 19'-0" 5' - 0 " 9' - 0 " ELECTRICAL EASEMENT SEWER EASEMENT U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T ABANDON SEWER EASEMENT no r t h PLANTRUEnorthFIRE ACCESS LANE THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. © DR A W N B Y : PR O J E C T # : CH E C K E D B Y : OWNER: 510 South 600 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 P: 801.355.6868 F: 801.355.6880 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. CONSULTANT: 2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: SHEET # BY M A R R I O T T DATE DESCRIPTION THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. # P. O . B O X 2 0 7 FL A G S T A F F , A Z 8 6 0 0 2 03/15/19 REZONE APP. 1/ 6 / 2 0 2 0 3 : 4 4 : 4 0 P M C: \ U s e r s \ a d a h l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 1 8 - 1 8 4 F a i r f i e l d I n n F o u n t ain H i l l s C e n t r a l V 1 9 _ A d a h l @ t r d p . c o m . r v t A0 5 0 AR C H I T E C T U R A L S I T E PL A N 18 -18 4 . 0 1 EL RH FA I R F I E L D I N N & S U I T E S 96 3 7 N O R T H S A G U A R O B O U L E V A R D FO U N T A I N H I L L S , A Z 8 5 2 6 8 CH A L E T , I N C . RE Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N 1/16" = 1'-0"1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SHEET NOTES V I C I N I T Y M A P PROJECT LOCATION XXXX GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CIVIL DOCUMENTS. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT AND CIVIL ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION. NO WORK SHALL BE PREFORMED ON THE CONTRADICTORY INFORMATION OR ANY EXISTING CONDITION NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITHOUT FIRST CONSULTING THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. 3. COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPING, PARKING STRIPS, AND SIDEWALKS SHOWN WITH LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION OF DRY UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR TO WORK WITH UTILITY PROVIDER, IE: FIBER OPTICS, CABLE CO., FOR RELOCATION OF SHORING, MAINTENANCE OR REPAIR OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. REFER TO CIVIL AND MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR WET UTILITIES. 5. FOR SIDEWALK AND PAVING FINISH GRADES, COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR ALL SITE LIGHTING/ POST LIGHTS. ARCHITECT AND LANDSCAPE TO VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS. SITE INFO LOT AREA: BUILDING: LANDSCAPE: PAVING / SIDEWALK: OUTDOOR PATIO: 70,804 S.F. (1.62 ACRES) 14,521 S.F. (21%) 18,852 S.F. (26%) 36,746 S.F. (52%) 656 S.F. (1%) PARKING: (1 PER UNIT + 1 PER 2 EMPLOYEES) REQUIRED: 72 STALLS PROVIDED: 60 STALLS* *(INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE & 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE) *(12 STALLS SHARED PARKING PROVIDED WITH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT)SAGUARO BOULEVARDS H E A B O U L E V A R D UP A2011 A200 2 A200 1 A201 2 4 A300 4 A300 6 A300 6 A300 5 A321 A420 1 2 A300 2 A300 A421 1 1 A300 1 A300 A408 1 A400 1 A402 13 A300 3 A300 5 A300 5 A300 A418 1 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 6 6 7 7 8 8 11 11 9 9 10 10 12 12 15 15 14 14 13 13 16 16 17 17 H H K K S S R R E E P P C C M F F FOOD PREP. 012 WORK ROOM 036 OFFICE 037 4' - 1 0 1 / 8 " 1 1 2 18'-2" 4 A320 2 A320 A423 1 A052 1 5.4 5.4 3.2 3.2 WW UU A A B B D G G L N N T T VV XX 7.8 7.8 Q VESTIBULE 001 CARTS 002 STORAGE 003 IN-A-PINCH 004 REGISTRATION 005 LOBBY 007 LOUNGE 008 QUICK PRINT 006 MECH / ELEC 009 WATER 010 HALLWAY 011 BUFFET 013 BREAKFAST 019 ELEVATOR LOBBY 020 FITNESS 021 MEN R.R. 022 VESTIBULE 023 WOMEN R.R. 024 POOL 025 POOL EQUIP 026 MECHANICAL 027 CORRIDOR 029 ICE 030 EMP BREAK 031 DRYERS 032 LAUNDRY 033 ELEV EQUIP 034ELEVATOR MDF / PBX/ MATV 035 STAIR 1 185 STAIR 2 190 PATIO 600 QUEEN QUEEN 102 KING 104 KING 106 KING 108 KING 110 QUEEN QUEEN 101 QUEEN QUEEN 103 KING 105 KING 107 ADA KING 109QUEEN QUEEN CONNECTOR 111 C. O . S . C.O.S. C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C. O . S . C.O.S. C.O.S. C.O.S. C.O.S. no r t h PLANTRUEnorthSS200 1 SS200 2 SS2011 SS201 2 SS210 1 SS210 2 SS2111 SS211 2 211'-4 1/2" 80 ' - 5 3 / 4 " THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. © DR A W N B Y : PR O J E C T # : CH E C K E D B Y : OWNER: 510 South 600 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 P: 801.355.6868 F: 801.355.6880 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. CONSULTANT: 2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: SHEET # BY M A R R I O T T DATE DESCRIPTION THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. # P. O . B O X 2 0 7 FL A G S T A F F , A Z 8 6 0 0 2 03/15/19 REZONE APP. 1/ 6 / 2 0 2 0 3 : 4 6 : 1 9 P M C: \ U s e r s \ a d a h l \ D o c u m e n t s \ 1 8 - 1 8 4 F a i r f i e l d I n n F o u n t ain H i l l s C e n t r a l V 1 9 _ A d a h l @ t r d p . c o m . r v t A1 0 1 MA I N L E V E L F L O O R PL A N 18 -18 4 . 0 1 EL RH FA I R F I E L D I N N & S U I T E S 96 3 7 N O R T H S A G U A R O B O U L E V A R D FO U N T A I N H I L L S , A Z 8 5 2 6 8 CH A L E T , I N C . RE Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NOTESXXXX GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS 2. ALL EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE GRID, FACE OF FOUNDATION WALL (U.N.O.). 3. ALL EXTERIOR FRAMED WALLS ARE LOCATED WITH EXTERIOR FACE OF SHEATHING ALIGNED TO THE EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE AND GRID (U.N.O.). 4. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS SHEETS FOR DETAILED NOTES ON FINISHES AND EQUIPMENT. 5. ALL GYP. BOARD WALLS AND CEILINGS ARE TO BE PAINTED (U.N.O.). 6. ALL INTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND WINDOW FRAMES SHALL BE PAINTED. 7. ALL DOOR OPENINGS ARE LOCATED WITH THE HINGE SIDE 4" OFF THE CORNER (U.N.O.). 8. FIRE SPRINKLER LOCATIONS ARE NOT INDICATED. 9. ALL INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD FRAMING U.N.O. 10. FIRE STOPPING MATERIAL FOR NON-FERROUS PIPE, CONDUIT AND OTHER SYNTHETIC MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH EACH OTHER. 11. PENETRATION OF SMOKE BARRIERS AND PARTITIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AND APPROVED FIRE/SMOKE SYSTEM OF A MINIMUM OF 1 HOUR FIRE RATED MATERIALS WHICH HAVE BEEN TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TESTING MATERIALS (ASTM) E 814. 12. CABINET WIDTH DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY AND MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED. 13. MAX. HEIGHT OF OUTLETS ON KITCHEN COUNTERS TO BE 44". OTHER OUTLETS MUST BE A MIN. OF 15" OFF FLOOR TO A MAX. OF 48" UNLESS LOCATED IN ADA ACCESSIBLE ROOMS. 14. PROVIDE GRAB BAR BLOCKING AT ALL ADA UNITS. 15. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 16. ALL TOPPING SLABS MUST BE POURED AFTER ROOF IS COMPLETE AND THE BUILDING IS DRIED IN. 17. PROVIDE FULL HEIGHT CORNER GUARDS AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS. ROOM TYPE MATRIX UNIT TYPE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 TOTAL KING 6 6 7 19 KING SUITE CONNECTOR - 1 - 1 - 6 8 14 QUEEN QUEEN - 1 - 1 QUEEN QUEEN CONNTECTOR 3 8 8 19 1 - - 1 QUEEN QUEEN XL ENTRY - 3 3 6 1 - - 1ADA KING - 1 - 1 ADA QUEEN QUEEN - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 ADA LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 TOTAL MOBILITY FEATURES (ACCESSIBLE) 1 2 1 4 COMMUNICATION FEATURES (HEARING IMPAIRED) 2 3 2 7 ADA KING SUITE ADA QUEEN QUEEN SUITE KING SUITE KING WIDE QUEEN QUEEN SUITE - 1 1 2 11 28 28 67TOTALS LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" 5 4 3 267811910121514131617 TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 1 15 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 4'- 1 0 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 44 ' - 2 " 5.4 3.27.8 LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" 5432 6 7 8 11910 12 151413 16 17 TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 1 2' - 2 " 2' - 0 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 44 ' - 2 " 5.43.2 7.8 THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. © DR A W N B Y : PR O J E C T # : CH E C K E D B Y : OWNER: 510 South 600 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 P: 801.355.6868 F: 801.355.6880 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. CONSULTANT: 2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: SHEET # BY M A R R I O T T DATE DESCRIPTION THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. # P. O . B O X 2 0 7 FL A G S T A F F , A Z 8 6 0 0 2 03/15/19 REZONE APP. 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 9 2 : 4 9 : 4 4 P M C: \ U s e r s \ j v a n n o o r d \ D o c u m e n t s \ 1 8 - 1 8 4 F a i r f i e l d I n n F ou n t a i n H i l l s C e n t r a l V 1 9 _ j v a n n o o r d . r v t A2 0 0 EX T E R I O R EL E V A T I O N S 18 -18 4 . 0 1 EL RH FA I R F I E L D I N N & S U I T E S 96 3 7 N O R T H S A G U A R O B O U L E V A R D FO U N T A I N H I L L S , A Z 8 5 2 6 8 CH A L E T , I N C . RE Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET NOTESXXXX GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS 2. REFER TO DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES FOR MORE INFORMATION. 3. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL CONNECT DIRECTLY TO STORM SEWER 4. CUSTOM COLORS ARE SELECTED AND SHALL BE FACTORY APPLIED. SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES OF ALL SIDING PRODUCTS TO ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EXTERIOR FINISH KEY EFIS - PRIMARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE COMET 1628 EFIS - SECONDARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE NOVEMBER RAIN 2142-60 EFIS - TERTIARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60 FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ILLUMINATION COLOR MATCH TO BENJAMIN MOORE MIDNIGHT OIL 1631 FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ROUGH SAWN, TABACCO EXTERIOR PAINTED STEEL, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60 METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60 METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE MIDNIGHT OIL 1631 EF-1 EF-2 EF-3 S-1 S-2 PT-1 MT-1 MT-2 LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" HKSR EP CF TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 2' - 2 " 2' - 0 " 4'- 1 0 1 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 44 ' - 2 " ABDGNTQ LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" H K SREPCMF TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 2' - 2 " 2' - 0 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 44 ' - 2 " 35 ' - 1 3 / 4 " WUABDGLNTV XQ 16 ' - 4 1 / 8 " THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. © DR A W N B Y : PR O J E C T # : CH E C K E D B Y : OWNER: 510 South 600 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 P: 801.355.6868 F: 801.355.6880 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. CONSULTANT: 2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: SHEET # BY M A R R I O T T DATE DESCRIPTION THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. # P. O . B O X 2 0 7 FL A G S T A F F , A Z 8 6 0 0 2 03/15/19 REZONE APP. 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 9 2 : 4 9 : 4 8 P M C: \ U s e r s \ j v a n n o o r d \ D o c u m e n t s \ 1 8 - 1 8 4 F a i r f i e l d I n n F ou n t a i n H i l l s C e n t r a l V 1 9 _ j v a n n o o r d . r v t A2 0 1 EX T E R I O R EL E V A T I O N S 18 -18 4 . 0 1 EL RH FA I R F I E L D I N N & S U I T E S 96 3 7 N O R T H S A G U A R O B O U L E V A R D FO U N T A I N H I L L S , A Z 8 5 2 6 8 CH A L E T , I N C . RE Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION SHEET NOTES 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION XXXX GENERAL NOTES 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS 2. REFER TO DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULES FOR MORE INFORMATION. 3. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL CONNECT DIRECTLY TO STORM SEWER 4. CUSTOM COLORS ARE SELECTED AND SHALL BE FACTORY APPLIED. SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES OF ALL SIDING PRODUCTS TO ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EXTERIOR FINISH KEY EFIS - PRIMARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE COMET 1628 EFIS - SECONDARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE NOVEMBER RAIN 2142-60 EFIS - TERTIARY COLOR, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60 FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ILLUMINATION COLOR MATCH TO BENJAMIN MOORE MIDNIGHT OIL 1631 FIBER CEMENT PANELING - ROUGH SAWN, TABACCO EXTERIOR PAINTED STEEL, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60 METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE WHITE DIAMOND 2121-60 METAL COPING / FLASHING / FASCIA, MATCH BENJAMIN MOORE MIDNIGHT OIL 1631 EF-1 EF-2 EF-3 S-1 S-2 PT-1 MT-1 MT-2 LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" 5432 6 7 8 11910 12 151413 16 17 TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 1 2'- 0 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 44 ' - 2 " 5.43.2 7.8 EF-2 EF-2 EF-2 EF-2EF-1 EF-1 EF-1ST-1 ST-1 ST-1 ST-1 ST-1 ST-1 ST-2 ST-2 ST-2ST-2ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2MT-2 MT-2 MT-1 ST-2 EF-1EF-1 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" 5 4 3 267811910121514131617 TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 1 15 ' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 2 " 44 ' - 2 " 5.4 3.27.8 1'-0" ST-2 ST-1 MT-1 EF-1 EF-2 EF-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1 EF-2 EF-1 EF-1 MT-1 MT-1 MT-1EF-2 ST-2 ST-1 MT-1MT-2 ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 MT-1 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH SHERMAN WILLAIMS 6675 - GARRET GRAY EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH MATCH SHERMAN WILLIAMS 6385 - DOVER WHITE ELDORADO STONE - MARQUEE 24 - DOVETAIL ELDORADO STONE - RIDGETOP 18 - WHISPER WHITE EF-1 EF-2 S-1 S-2 EXTERIOR FINISH KEY T-GROOVE FLUSH JOINT CORTEN AZP PAINTED METAL PANELMT-1 DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM PANELMT-2 THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. © DR A W N B Y : PR O J E C T # : CH E C K E D B Y : OWNER: 510 South 600 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 P: 801.355.6868 F: 801.355.6880 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. CONSULTANT: 2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: SHEET # BY M A R R I O T T DATE DESCRIPTION THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. # P. O . B O X 2 0 7 FL A G S T A F F , A Z 8 6 0 0 2 03/15/19 REZONE APP. 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 9 2 : 5 1 : 4 0 P M C: \ U s e r s \ j v a n n o o r d \ D o c u m e n t s \ 1 8 - 1 8 4 F a i r f i e l d I n n F ou n t a i n H i l l s C e n t r a l V 1 9 _ j v a n n o o r d . r v t A2 0 2 CO L O R E D EL E V A T I O N S 18 -18 4 . 0 1 EL RH FA I R F I E L D I N N & S U I T E S 96 3 7 N O R T H S A G U A R O B O U L E V A R D FO U N T A I N H I L L S , A Z 8 5 2 6 8 CH A L E T , I N C . RE Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SSOUTH ELEVATION - COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION - COLOR LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" HKSR EP CF TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 2' - 2 " 2' - 0 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 44 ' - 2 " ABDGNTQ EF-2 ST-1 ST-2 MT-1 ST-1 ST-2 EF-1 MT-1 ST-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-1 LEVEL 1 0' -0" LEVEL 2 15' -0" LEVEL 3 26' -1 3/4" H K SREPCMF TRUSS BEARING 1 35' -1 3/4" LOW PARAPET 1 40' -0" MID PARAPET1 42' -0" HIGH PARAPET 1 44' -2" 2' - 2 " 2' - 0 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 15 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 44 ' - 2 " WUABDGLNTV XQ ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 EF-1EF-2 MT-1 MT-1 EF-2 MT-1 EF-1 EF-1ST-2 ST-2 ST-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 ST-1 ST-2 ST-1 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 MT-2 ST-1 ST-2 16 ' - 4 1 / 8 " EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH SHERMAN WILLAIMS 6675 - GARRET GRAY EIFS - COLOR TO MATCH MATCH SHERMAN WILLIAMS 6385 - DOVER WHITE ELDORADO STONE - MARQUEE 24 - DOVETAIL ELDORADO STONE - RIDGETOP 18 - WHISPER WHITE EF-1 EF-2 S-1 S-2 EXTERIOR FINISH KEY T-GROOVE FLUSH JOINT CORTEN AZP PAINTED METAL PANELMT-1 DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM PANELMT-2 THE GRAPHIC MATERIAL AND DESIGN ON THIS SHEET ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND REMAIN AT ALL TIMES THE PROPERTY OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. REPRODUCTION OR REUSE OF THE MATERIAL AND DESIGN CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. © DR A W N B Y : PR O J E C T # : CH E C K E D B Y : OWNER: 510 South 600 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 P: 801.355.6868 F: 801.355.6880 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. CONSULTANT: 2018 THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: SHEET # BY M A R R I O T T DATE DESCRIPTION THE RICHARDSON DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, L.L.C. # P. O . B O X 2 0 7 FL A G S T A F F , A Z 8 6 0 0 2 03/15/19 REZONE APP. 12 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 9 2 : 5 2 : 0 6 P M C: \ U s e r s \ j v a n n o o r d \ D o c u m e n t s \ 1 8 - 1 8 4 F a i r f i e l d I n n F ou n t a i n H i l l s C e n t r a l V 1 9 _ j v a n n o o r d . r v t A2 0 3 CO L O R E D EL E V A T I O N S 18 -18 4 . 0 1 EL RH FA I R F I E L D I N N & S U I T E S 96 3 7 N O R T H S A G U A R O B O U L E V A R D FO U N T A I N H I L L S , A Z 8 5 2 6 8 CH A L E T , I N C . RE Z O N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - COLOR 1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION - COLOR From: To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Fwd: Zoning Meeting Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:11:21 PM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Ole Umpa <Date: February 6, 2020 at 1:38:06 PM MSTTo: " >Subject: Zoning Meeting We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed. Name:Robert Nicol Unit# pzc@fh.az.gov From:Joanne Case To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Monterra Ranch / Rezoning Meeting 2/13/2020 Date:Wednesday, February 5, 2020 6:22:02 PM Importance:High This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. To Mr. Wesley and the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission: I own and reside in a unit located in Monterra Ranch. Without a doubt, I highly oppose therezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know thatI do not approve of this proposal. I am requesting that the Zoning not be changed. I willattend the zoning meeting on 2/13/2020 to voice my opposition. Thank you for your time. Joanne Case Unit Monterra Ranch From:Ole Umpa To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Monterra Ranch Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:09:50 AM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. As a Owner in Monterra Ranch we feel rezoning the parcel of land next to Monterra Ranch from C1 to C2 is terrible idea. People invested their money and checked out the zoning of that parcel before they bought. Views of the landscape around F.H.is one main attraction people buy in our city. Please put yourselves in these owners shoes and now, you are starring at a wall with Windows in it while sitting on your patio.Great! I think the resale of these units will go down for these owners. I Would be in favor keeping the height restriction of C1 the same as any other zoning that would be considered.Also if the parking lot would be next to the wall of Monterra Ranch,I think that might work. I hope the above suggestions will be brought up as a viable option that could work for everyone. THANK you, Ron & Gloria Luepke Owners of unit Monterra Ranch From:Ole Umpa To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Opposition Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 7:56:49 AM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed. Steve Smith Unit Owner for 9 years From:Matalynne Wandel To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Re February 13, 2020 meeting on property adjacent to Monterra Ranch Date:Wednesday, February 5, 2020 7:28:00 PM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission: As owners of Monterra Ranch, we oppose the rezoning of the parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that we do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Board that the zoning NOT be changed. Thank you, Matalynne and Herbert Wandel Unit Monterra Ranch From:Karyn Brown To:Rudy Cc:PZC (Commission) Subject:RE: Monterra Ranch Owners - Pending Zoning Case Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:13:15 AM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. Good Morning: We just sent our notice. We think that the address below should be corrected to pzc@fh.az.gov. Thanks, Karyn & Greg Brown Unit From: Rudy Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 2:49 PM To: Rudy Subject: Monterra Ranch Owners - Pending Zoning Case To the Owners of Property at Monterra Ranch: As you know the Planning and Zoning Commission are going to be voting on a change to the zoning of the property adjacent to Monterra Ranch for the building of a 3 story Hotel. I am sending you this with the hope that you would copy and send it to the Zoning Board before the Feb. 13th meeting. To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commision, We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed. Website : pzc@fh.az.go Your Name: Unit #: Monterra Ranch Thank You if you have questions please feel free to email myself, Steve Smith Unit Board Vice Pres. at From:Karyn Brown To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Rezoning from C-1 to C-2 of Parcel APN#176-10-805 Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:09:02 AM Importance:High This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.     Importance: High To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commision,   We the owners of Monterra Ranch, Unit 47, oppose the rezoning of the parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that we do not approve and recommend that the zoning not be changed.   Gregory and Karyn Brown Monterra Ranch Condominiums N. Monterey Dr. Unit  Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 From:FRANCIS UCHO To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Re-zoning of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:16:26 PM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. I am strongly opposed to the proposed rezoning of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from C-1 to C-2 Submitted by Frank Ucho Owner and resident Unit Monterrra Ranch N. Monterey DrFountain Hills From:Ole Umpa To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Zoning Meeting Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:17:30 AM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commision, We / Myself the Owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranch from a C1 to C2. Please know that We / Myself do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Board that the Zoning not be changed. Your Name: Diane Powers Unit #: Monterra Ranch From:Maggie Olmschenk To:PZC (Commission) Subject:Zoning Case Date:Thursday, February 6, 2020 3:31:34 PM This message originated from an External Source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. To the members of the planning and zoning commission We/myself the owners of Monterra Ranch oppose the rezoning of the Parcel of land adjacent to Monterra Ranchfrom a C1 to C2. Please know that We/Mysel do not approve and follow with a recommendation to the P&Z Boardthat the Zoning not be changed.Margaret OlmschenkUnit Monterra Ranch ORDINANCE NO. 20-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING DISTRICT MAPS OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.62 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAGUARO BOULEVARD NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH SAGUARO BOULEVARD AND EAST SHEA BOULEVARD (AKA 9637 NORTH SAGUAGO BOULEVARD; APN#176-10-805) FROM C-1 – NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL ZONING DISTRICT TO C-2 – INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town”) adopted Ordinance No. 93-22, on November 18, 1993, adopting the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, Chapter 2, Procedures, Section 2.01, Amendments or Zone Changes, of the Zoning Ordinance establishes the authority and procedures for amending the zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-462.04, public hearings were advertised in the January 29, 2020 and the February 5, 2020 editions of the Times of Fountain Hills; WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on February 13, 2020, and by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills on March 17, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The approximately 1.62 acre parcel of real property located at 9637 N Saguaro Blvd., as more particularly described and depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is rezoned from “C-1 – Neighborhood Commercial and Professional Zoning District” to "C-2 – Intermediate Commercial Zoning District.” SECTION 3. That rezoning is adopted subject to the following conditions: 2 1. Planting and maintenance of trees along the north property line of a species that will grow to a height of at least 25-feet and spaced to provide a solid screen along the property line. The trees when planted shall be a minimum 10-foot tall, 36-inch box tree. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Approval of the C-2 zoning is conditioned on development of the project commencing within one year of the effective date of this Ordinance. 1. Prior to the expiration of the one-year time condition, the property owner or authorized representative may submit an application for an extension to the Town. A submittal of an application for extension of the one-year time condition does not toll the running of the time condition. Should the one-year time condition expire between the submittal of an application for a time extension and the public hearing on the requested extension, the C-2 zoning designation shall be subject to reversion as set forth below. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the Town’s Zoning Administrator shall submit the request to the Town Council for consideration at a public hearing held as set forth below. 2. The Town Council shall, after notices via certified mail to the property owner and authorized representative have been provided at least 15 days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing, hold a public hearing on the extension request. The Town Council may, in its sole discretion, grant an extension of the time condition, subject to the limitation on the number of extensions set forth below. If the public hearing is held after expiration of the time condition, the Town Council may also, at that public hearing, take action to revert the zoning on the property to its prior zoning classification. 3. In the event the project has not commenced within the one-year time period and no request for time extension has been received as provided above, the Zoning Administrator may submit the C-2 – Intermediate Commercial zoning designation of the subject property to the Town Council for consideration of reversion, pursuant to the hearing procedure set forth below. 4. The Zoning Administrator shall notify the property owner and authorized representative by certified mail of the Town Council’s intention to hold a hearing to determine compliance with the one-year time condition, and to revert the zoning on the property to its former classification if the condition is determined by the Town Council to have not been met. All such notices shall be made at least 15 days prior to the date of the scheduled hearing. The Town Council may, in its sole discretion, either grant an extension of the time condition, subject to the 3 limitation on the number of extensions set forth below, or revert the zoning on the property to its prior zoning classification. 5. The Town Council may grant up to two one-year extensions of the time condition. 6. Following the commencement of the project, the Zoning Administrator shall monitor the project to ensure it continues to completion. Upon the Zoning Administrator’s initial determination that the project is not being actively pursued, no further review or approval of any project site plan or plat shall occur until it is determined that good cause exists for delay in the construction of the project. Should the project fail to proceed, a public hearing shall be held by the Town Council to determine the cause of the delay. At the public hearing on the matter, if the Town Council determines that there is not good cause for the delay, it may impose additional conditions on the property owner to ensure compliance. If such additional conditions are not met, the Zoning Administrator may set the matter for public hearing, according to the process set forth in subsection above, on a possible reversion from C-2 – Intermediate Commercial zoning to C-1 – Neighborhood Commercial and Professional zoning. 7. For purposes of this Section, the terms “commence,” “commencing” and “commencement” shall mean physical vertical construction activity in accordance with a valid building permit issued by the Town. SECTION 6. The Mayor, the Town Manager, the Town Clerk and the Town Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to execute all documents and take all steps necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Ordinance. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 17th day of March, 2020. FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO: Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Burke, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney Grady Miller, Town Manager Town Attorney