HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025.0909.TCWSES.AGENDA.PACKET
NOTICE OF MEETING
WORK AND EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
TOWN COUNCIL
Mayor Gerry M. Friedel
Vice Mayor Allen Skillicorn
Councilmember Gayle Earle
Councilmember Brenda J. Kalivianakis
Councilmember Hannah Larrabee
Councilmember Peggy McMahon
Councilmember Rick Watts
TIME:
WHEN:
WHERE:
1:00 PM - WORK AND EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
DOORS OPEN 15 MINUTES PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING.
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2025
WORK SESSION - FOUNTAIN HILLS COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EXECUTIVE SESSION - FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA
Councilmembers of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a
quorum of the Town’s various Commission, Committee or Board members may be in attendance at the
Council meeting.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions,
parents have a right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions make a video or audio
recording of a minor child. Meetings of the Town Council are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result,
proceedings in which children are present may be subject to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise
their rights may either file written consent with the Town Clerk to such recording, or take personal action to
ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may be made. If a child is present at the
time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents pursuant to A.R.S. §1-
602.A.9 have been waived.
REQUEST TO COMMENT
The public is welcome to participate in Council meetings.
TO SPEAK TO A CONSENT OR REGULAR AGENDA ITEM, complete a Request to Comment card and hand it to the Town Clerk
prior to discussion of that item. Include the agenda item NUMBER on which you wish to comment. A separate submission is
required for each agenda item. Request to Comment cards will not be accepted once the Council deliberations begin. Submit
a Request to Comment card prior to a public hearing agenda item.
TO COMMENT ON A CONSENT OR REGULAR AGENDA ITEM IN WRITING ONLY, complete a Request to Comment card,
indicating that it is a written comment, check the box on whether you are FOR or AGAINST a consent or regular agenda item,
and hand it to the Town Clerk prior to discussion on that item. A separate submission is required for each agenda item.
TO SPEAK TO CALL TO THE PUBLIC, complete a Request to Comment card and hand it to the Town Clerk. Speakers will be
allowed three contiguous minutes to address the Council. Verbal comments should be directed through the Presiding Officer
and not to individual Councilmembers.
TO COMMENT IN WRITING ONLINE, Visit https://www.fountainhillsaz.gov/publiccomment and submit a Request to
Comment card no later than 12:00 PM on the day prior to the meeting. These comments are shared with the Town Council.
This Request to Comment card, and any information you write on it, is a public record subject to public disclosure.
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Town Council, and to the
general public, that at this meeting, the Town Council may vote to go into executive session, which will
not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the Town's attorneys for legal advice on
any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S.§38-431.03(A)(3).
Meeting Packet Page 1 of 39
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. WORK SESSION STATEMENT
All Items Listed Are for Discussion Only. No Action Can or Will Be Taken. The primary purpose of work
sessions is to provide the Council with the opportunity for in-depth discussion and study of specific subjects.
Public comment is not provided for on the agenda and may be made only as approved by consensus of the
Council. In appropriate circumstances, a brief presentation may be permitted by a member of the public or
another interested party if invited by the Mayor or the Town Manager to do so. The Presiding Officer may
limit or end the time for such presentations.
4. WORK SESSION AGENDA
a. DISCUSSION: Relating to Community Center Fees/Waivers for Local Nonprofit
Organizations
b. DISCUSSION: Relating to Employee and Council Pay Adjustments
5. ADJOURNMENT
6. CALL TO ORDER
7. ROLL CALL
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION
PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the attorney or
attorneys of the public body.; and PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(4) Discussion or consultation with the
attorneys of the public body in order to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the public
body's position regarding contracts that are the subject of negotiations, in pending or contemplated
litigation or in settlement discussions conducted in order to avoid or resolve litigation. (Specifically, related
to the N-Shea Group LLC development agreement)
9. ADJOURNMENT
Dated this 5th day of September 2025.
Bevelyn J. Bender, Town Clerk
The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call (480) 816-5100 (voice) or (800) 367-
8939 (TDD) 48-hours prior to the meeting to request reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain agenda information in large
print format. Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished to the Council with this agenda are available for review in the Clerk's Office.
Meeting Packet Page 2 of 39
ITEM 4.a.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 9/9/2025
Meeting Type: Town Council Work and Executive Sessions
Submitting Department: Community Services
Prepared by: Kevin Snipes, Community Services Director
Staff Contact Information: Phone: 480-816-5178
Email: ksnipes@fountainhillsaz.gov
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language)
DISCUSSION: Relating to Community Center Fees/Waivers for Local Nonprofit Organizations Staff Summary (background)
Several Councilmembers and the Mayor have raised questions regarding local nonprofit fees
and waiver practices at the Community Center. While Council previously discussed and took
action on this matter, implementation was suspended pending further review and
discussion.
This work session will provide an opportunity to examine the importance of applying
uniform waivers for all local nonprofits to ensure consistency and transparency in
Community Center use. In addition, staff will present multiple options for revising the
nonprofit fee/waiver for potential future action, or staff will implement the previously
voted-on revised fees if that is the direction of Council.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
NA Risk Analysis
NA Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
NA Staff Recommendation(s)
NA Suggested Motion
No motion is required at this time. This item is presented for discussion to obtain Council
direction regarding the fee policy, which will be brought forward at a future Council meeting
for consideration and action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Impact:
Budget Reference:
Funding Source:
ATTACHMENTS
Meeting Packet Page 3 of 39
1. Community Center Fees/Waivers
Meeting Packet Page 4 of 39
Presented by
Kevin Snipes
Community Services Director
Community
Center Fees/Waivers
Meeting Packet Page 5 of 39
Discussion Topic: Local Nonprofit Fees
•Fee Structure: Determine how much local nonprofits should pay to use the Community Center.
•Consistency: Apply a uniform fee policy across all nonprofit organizations to ensure fairness.
•Administrative Efficiency: Streamline accounting and billing processes for staff by using clear, consistent rates.
•Resource Management: Set fees in a way that promotes efficient use of staff time and facility resources.
•Community Impact: Fees should reflect the value of facility use while balancing community benefit and operational costs.
Why are we here?
Meeting Packet Page 6 of 39
Current Situation Illustrated
Full Rate - $100
per hour Resident/Nonprofit
Rate - $50 per hour
Discount 1
Discount 2Discount 3
Discount 4 Discount 5
Discount 6
Discount 7
Discount 8
Discount 9
Discount 10
Meeting Packet Page 7 of 39
Desired Situation Illustrated
Full Rate - $100 per
hour
Resident/Nonprofit
Rate - $50 per hour
Local Nonprofits
Rate – Council
Direction
Meeting Packet Page 8 of 39
• Spanish Classes
• Line Dancing
• Bridge
• Mah Jongg
• Bunko
• Exercise & Yoga
• Poker
• Free Tech Guidance
• Open Jam
• Alzheimer’s Support
• Caregivers Support
• Band and Choir Concerts
• Conferences/Conventions
•Medicare Consultations
•Open Paint Studio
•Quilts and More
•Golden Age of Radio
•Swing Time
•Bingo
•Veterans to Veterans
Discussion Group
•Weddings
•Quinceañeras
•Friends in the Hills
•Bridge Tournaments
•Gun Shows
•Bar and Bat Mitzvahs
•Friends in the Hills
•Blood Drives
•Volunteer Programs
•Band and Choir Concerts
•Income Tax Preparation
•Memory Café
•Pinochle
•Cribbage
•Trade Shows
•HOA Meetings
•Political Parties
•FH Women's Club
•Realtor Meetings
•Four Peaks Rotary
•Community Groups
•Breakfast with Santa
•Sensitive Santa
•Munch and Music
•Table Tennis
•Dominoes
•Wood Carvers
•Grief Support
Community Center Programing
Meeting Packet Page 9 of 39
2025 Total Ballroom Reservations
Meeting Packet Page 10 of 39
*There are 65 total Local Nonprofits who have used the
Community Center in the past few years
**Tonight's discussion only effects the Local Nonprofit Rates
Total Ballroom Reservations FY25 = 435
Total Local Nonprofit Reservations FY25 = 106
Ballroom Reservations FY25
Meeting Packet Page 11 of 39
8
Past Fee Reduction or No Charge Examples
•First 60hrs free then 50% off room rentals
•Free stage installation ( Note: labor intensive)
•Previous direction allowed local non-profit pricing for a Scottsdale non-profit
•Items provided with reduced or no cost recovery:
•Display Board
•Microphones
•Screens
•Projectors
•Coffee
•Reservations outside of standard hours of operation
•50% reduction in direct staffing cost recovery
Meeting Packet Page 12 of 39
Reasons for Minimum Hourly Requirements
•Limited Availability of Ballrooms – Booking for very short timeframes reduces
availability for other renters who may need the space for longer events.
•Operational Efficiency – Preparing and turning over the ballroom for each rental
(setup, cleaning, breakdown) requires staff time and resources regardless of the rental
length.
•Maximizing Earning Potential – Shorter rentals can block off prime time slots, which
limits opportunities to secure longer, higher-value bookings.
•Event Flow & Guest Experience – A minimum booking ensures adequate time for
setup, event execution, and cleanup, resulting in a smoother experience for both hosts
and guests.
•Cost Effectiveness – Staffing, utilities, and facility upkeep costs are incurred for every
event; minimum hours help cover these baseline expenses. Opening the building
for one ballroom is not cost effective.
Ballroom Minimum Requirements
Meeting Packet Page 13 of 39
Community Center Revenues and Expenditures
Past 3 Fiscal Years
*This analysis captures most Community Center operating revenues/expenditures other than the Volunteer and Home
Delivered Deals programs, or capital improvement costs.
**Includes estimated utility costs, which are shared among other facilities on the Town Campus.
Meeting Packet Page 14 of 39
Local Non-Profit Rental Revenues and
Discounts
Past 3 Fiscal Years
Total Calculated Rental Fee Discounts for Local Nonprofits:
•FY2023 Discounts: Data unavailable
•FY2024 Discounts: $58,456
•FY2025 Discounts: $57,475
Meeting Packet Page 15 of 39
12
Average charges Per Meeting
1) $77.65
2) $206.80
3) $103.40
4) $206.80
5) $147.08
6) $155.10
7) $150.38
Example Fees and Discounts
Full Price Per Meeting
$155.10
$561.02
$354.22
$561.02 $397.90
1BR $561.36/2BR $871.36
2hrs $404.50 4hrs $507.90
Yearly chargeWith discount
$271.43
$1,861.20
$930.60
$2,068.00
$1,764.96
$1,706.10
$3,238.55
Yearly withoutDiscount
$2,791.80
$5,049.18
$3,187.98
$5,179.88
$4,774.80
$6,174.96 - $9,587.16
10,517.00 - $13,205.40
Difference
$2,520.37
$3,187.98
$2,257.38
$3,111.88
$3,009.84
$4,468.86 - $7,881.06
$7,278.45 - $9,966.85
*Seven example local Non-profit groups highlight the inconsistent discount procedure
and the variable cost recovery models
Meeting Packet Page 16 of 39
Options
Give all groups the same discounted rate which would include the following options:
Option 1) (Currently Approved) Apply Current Resident/Nonprofit rates
(no Sunday rentals)
Mon-Thur: $25 classroom 2hr min, $50 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $75 per ballroom 4hr min
Option 2) Create a separate local nonprofit Discounted rate option
10% off above rates
Mon-Thur: $22.5 classroom 2hr min, $45 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $67.5 per ballroom 4hr min
30% off above rates
Mon-Thur: $17.5 classroom 2hr min, $35 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $52.5 per ballroom 4hr min
50% off above rates
Mon-Thur: $12.5 classroom 2hr min, $25 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $37.5 per ballroom 4hr min
Meeting Packet Page 17 of 39
Video Projector - Note Vision 3,000 Lumens $55.00
Flat Screen TV $55.00
Small Screen $55.00
Large Screen (8' x 10')$55.00
Microphones – Wireless $25.00
Portable White Board $5.00
Walker Display Board $5.00
Portable Sound System $85.00
Dance Floor - per 4' x 4' parquet square (16’x16”)$225.00
Dance Floor - per 4' x 4' parquet square (20’x20’)$280.00
Dance Floor - per 4' x 4' parquet square (24’x24’)$325.00
Staging 6' x 8" section (1 piece)$25.00 per piece
Coffee Service $25.00 per request
Portable Bar $50.00
Labor Charges (min of 2 staff per hour)
$55.00 per hour
per staff
Meeting Extras, Current Itemized costs
Meeting Packet Page 18 of 39
Meeting Optional Extras
Staff Recommendation:
$25.00 Flat fee for each of the following, per meeting:
•All Audio Video options, including:
Video projector and screen, flat screen TV, microphones, speakers,
walker display board, etc.
•Coffee service
Exceptions:
•Stage: $25.00 per section, per meeting
•Dance Floor at standard rate
Meeting Packet Page 19 of 39
What Happens Next?
•Choose fee range that you would like staff to implement
•If no change to policy, no additional action needed
•Policy suspension ends per previous council action, rental rates resumed as
directed for FY26
•Vote, if needed on new changes, during the Oct 7 Council Meeting
•Public Comment to be heard
•Minimum 30 days to go into effect
•Recommend Jan 1 implementation, to allow for notice to all local non-profits
Meeting Packet Page 20 of 39
Review of Options
Give all groups the same discounted rate which would include the following options:
Option 1) (Currently Approved) Apply Current Resident/Nonprofit rates
(no Sunday rentals)
Mon-Thur: $25 classroom 2hr min, $50 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $75 per ballroom 4hr min
Option 2) Create separate local nonprofit Discounted rate options
10% off above rates
Mon-Thur: $22.5 classroom 2hr min, $45 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $67.5 per ballroom 4hr min
30% off above rates
Mon-Thur: $17.5 classroom 2hr min, $35 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $52.5 per ballroom 4hr min
50% off above rates
Mon-Thur: $12.5 classroom 2hr min, $25 per ballroom 4hr min
Fri-Sat: $37.5 per ballroom 4hr min
Meeting Packet Page 21 of 39
Questions/Comments
Meeting Packet Page 22 of 39
ITEM 4.b.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 9/9/2025
Meeting Type: Town Council Work and Executive Sessions
Submitting Department: Administration / Finance
Prepared by: Paul Soldinger, Chief Financial Officer
Staff Contact Information: Phone: 480-816-5160
Email: psoldinger@fountainhillsaz.gov
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language)
DISCUSSION: Relating to Employee and Council Pay Adjustments Staff Summary (background)
At the June 17, 2025 Town Council meeting, Council discussed both annual employee pay
increase concepts and Council pay adjustments. The consensus from that discussion was to
direct staff to develop a systematic, blended approach to annual employee salary
adjustments. Accordingly, this report focuses narrowly on that directive. It is not intended to
revisit the Town’s overall compensation strategy or broader pay policies.
This proposal establishes a transparent, repeatable mechanism for annual salary
adjustments that reflects both national labor cost trends and the competitive local labor
market. The goal is to ensure our compensation remains market-relevant while avoiding ad-
hoc or subjective changes that can create inconsistency and unpredictability in our
budgeting process. Therefore, staff will discuss a proposed approach to use a peer market
index (PMI), based on the annual League of Arizona Cities & Towns Salary & Benefit Survey
and the Employment Cost Index (ECI) published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
every year.
The formula-based pay adjustment would be calculated by March of each year to be
included in the proposed budget presented to Council every April, based on budgetary
availability. Regarding past discssuion about using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as a data
point for this calculation, staff had found that CPI is more volatile and may not accurately
reflect actual wage trends in the labor market. Focusing staff pay adjustments on PMI and
ECI provides a more comprehensive and stable approach to salary adjustments, which also
provides stability in each year's budget.
Regarding Council stipends, the Town Council retains full authority over its own
compensation; staff recommends a consistent process to ensure transparency and budget
clarity. For example, Council could consider adjustments every two years, aligned with
election cycles, which would be effective the following January past the election cycle and
Council approval. The changes made to Council stipends is at the Council discretion. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
N/A Risk Analysis
Meeting Packet Page 23 of 39
N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A Staff Recommendation(s)
N/A - For Discussion Suggested Motion
No motion required. This item is for discussion on employee and council pay adjustments
that may be brought back to a future Council meeting for possible action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Impact:
Budget Reference:
Funding Source:
ATTACHMENTS
1. Staff Pay and Council Stipend Adjustments Presentation
2. Proposed Annual Salary Adjustment Rule
Meeting Packet Page 24 of 39
Annual Salary
Adjustments
A transparent framework for consistent
compensation management using market data
September 9, 2025
Meeting Packet Page 25 of 39
Contents
01 Problem & Solution Overview
Current ad-hoc approach vs systematic formula
02 Key Components
ECI, PMI, and formula methodology
03 Historical Performance
Backtesting results and analysis
04 Council Pay & Implementation Plan
Next steps and timeline
Meeting Packet Page 26 of 39
Market Data Sources
Balanced National & Local Approach
Combining Employment Cost Index (ECI) from Bureau of
Labor Statistics with Peer Market Index (PMI) from 28
Phoenix-metro municipalities creates comprehensive
market responsiveness
Meeting Packet Page 27 of 39
Proposed Formula
Year ECI Rate PMI Rate Proposed AGA Actual Increase Variance
FY 2023 4.4%3.22%3.81%4.0%+0.19%
FY 2024 5.1%4.99%5.05%7.0%+1.95%
FY 2025 4.1%6.11%5.11%4.5%-0.61%
FY 2026 3.6%5.44%4.52%2.5%-2.02%
Simple & Transparent Calculation
Annual General Adjustment (AGA) = (50% × ECI) + (50% × PMI). This formula directly responds to
market conditions without subjective interpretation.
Meeting Packet Page 28 of 39
Understanding Our Data Sources
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Measures household price changes for goods/services
Includes volatile categories like energy and food
May not reflect actual labor market conditions
VS
Employment Cost Index (ECI)
Measures employer labor costs specifically
Focuses on wages and salaries for same jobs
Used by Federal Reserve for wage policy decisions
Meeting Packet Page 29 of 39
28
Peer Cities
50/50
ECI/PMI Split
Q4-Q4
ECI Measure
Jan
PMI Release
Predictability
Formula-based adjustments eliminate annual
deliberation
▸Consistent calculation method
▸Transparent data sources
▸Budget planning certainty
Market Balance
Combines national stability with local
competitiveness
▸National wage trend benchmark
▸Local market responsiveness
▸Reduced year-to-year volatility
Implementation
Integrates seamlessly into annual budget
process with Council override capability
▸January PMI data availability
▸May-June budget adoption
▸Council retains flexibility to override for
extraordinary circumstances
Meeting Packet Page 30 of 39
Town Council Pay Adjustments
Council Authority
Council retains full authority over its own compensation; staff recommends a consistent process to ensure
transparency and budgeting clarity.
Process Framework
• Consider adjustments every two years, aligned with Council/Mayoral election cycles (August)
• Effective January following election cycle and Council approval
• Budget integration: Changes could be incorporated into the budget process the spring prior to elections
• Council discretion: For example the increase could be a percentage or flat amount
Meeting Packet Page 31 of 39
Thank You
Questions & Discussion
Ready to implement systematic salary adjustments that balance
fiscal responsibility with competitive compensation
Meeting Packet Page 32 of 39
Proposed Annual Salary Adjustment Rule
Town of Fountain Hills
Purpose
At the June 17, 2025 Town Council meeting, Council discussed both annual employee pay
increase concepts and Council pay adjustments. The consensus from that discussion was
to direct staff to develop a systematic, blended approach to annual employee salary
adjustments. Accordingly, this report focuses narrowly on that directive. It is not intended
to revisit the Town’s overall compensation strategy or broader pay policies.
This proposal establishes a transparent, repeatable mechanism for annual salary
adjustments that reflects both national labor cost trends and the competitive local labor
market. The goal is to ensure our compensation remains market-relevant while avoiding
ad-hoc or subjective changes that can create inconsistency and unpredictability in our
budgeting process.
Key Term Definitions
Annual General Adjustment (AGA): A formula-based pay adjustment figure we have defined
for internal use. It blends national wage growth data with local competitive pay trends to
produce the annual adjustment percentage to be applied to employee compensation.
Peer Market Index (PMI): Newly defined for our purposes, this represents the average pay
range increase reported by a broad group of peer municipalities in the Phoenix
metropolitan area, as reflected in the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Salary & Benefit
Survey. The PMI captures compensation trends among comparable cities and towns in our
region.
Employment Cost Index (ECI): Unlike AGA and PMI, the ECI is a long-standing federal
statistic produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). It measures the percentage
change in employer labor costs (wages and salaries) from one quarter to the same quarter
the previous year, holding job types constant to remove distortions from workforce
composition changes. The ECI has been published quarterly since the late 1970s and is
widely used by the Federal Reserve, government agencies, and private sector
organizations to guide wage policy decisions. While the methodology has evolved over
time (such as the adoption of NAICS/SOC classification systems in 2006), it remains
historically comparable and provides a reliable national benchmark for wage trends.
Meeting Packet Page 33 of 39
CPI in Context: Understanding Its Role in Salary Adjustments
The Consumer Price Index measures household price inflation rather than the cost of
labor. CPI can be significantly influenced by volatile categories such as energy prices or
housing costs and may not accurately reflect actual wage trends in the labor market.
Relying solely on CPI for salary adjustments creates several risks. First, it can lead to
overpayment during temporary inflation spikes when consumer prices rise faster than
wages. Second, it may result in underpayment in strong labor markets where wage
competition drives compensation increases that exceed general inflation, potentially
compromising our ability to retain and recruit quality employees.
Why ECI Plus PMI Creates an Effective Framework
The combination of ECI and PMI provides a more comprehensive and balanced approach
to salary adjustments. The ECI provides a stable, national benchmark of wage trends that
reflects actual labor market conditions rather than consumer price fluctuations.
Meanwhile, the PMI captures the realities of the Phoenix-metro labor market in which we
directly compete for talent. Combining both indices balances local competitiveness with
national trends and reduces year-to-year volatility that might result from relying on either
data set alone. This approach ensures our compensation strategy remains both fiscally
responsible and competitive.
Proposed Formula
The Annual General Adjustment (AGA) would be calculated using the following formula:
Annual General Adjustment (AGA) = (50% × ECI) + (50% × PMI)
The ECI component uses the year-over-year percentage change in private industry wages
and salaries, measured from Q4 to Q4 as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The
PMI component represents the average percentage change in pay ranges among reporting
peer municipalities in the League survey.
This formula is designed to respond directly to market conditions, allowing the calculation
to stand on its own merits.
For example, if the ECI shows a 4.0% increase and the PMI shows a 5.0% increase, the
calculation would be: AGA = (0.5 × 4.0) + (0.5 × 5.0) = 4.5%
Historical Analysis
To evaluate the effectiveness of this proposed approach, we conducted a backtest
analysis comparing what the AGA formula would have produced against the actual salary
increases implemented by the Town over recent fiscal years.
Meeting Packet Page 34 of 39
For FY 2023, the PMI from the League survey averaged 3.22%, while the ECI showed a 4.4%
increase. The proposed AGA would have been 3.81%, compared to the actual Town
increase of 4.0%. This shows close alignment between the formula and actual practice.
In FY 2024, the PMI was 4.99% and the ECI was 5.1%, producing a proposed AGA of 5.05%.
The actual Town increase was 7.0%, suggesting the Town exceeded what market
conditions would have supported under this formula.
For FY 2025, the PMI reached 6.11% while the ECI was 4.1%, creating a proposed AGA of
5.11%. The actual Town increase was 4.5%, indicating the Town's adjustment fell slightly
below what the formula would have recommended.
Looking at FY 2026, the PMI was 5.44% and the ECI was 3.6%, yielding a proposed AGA of
4.52%. The actual Town increase was 2.5%, representing a gap below the formula
recommendation.
This historical analysis demonstrates that the proposed formula would have provided
more consistent and market-responsive adjustments than the ad-hoc approach used in
recent years.
Benefits of Adopting the Rule
Implementing this salary adjustment rule offers several significant advantages for the
Town's compensation management and budgeting processes.
Predictability: Once the Council approves the rule, annual salary adjustment numbers flow
directly from the formula without requiring extensive deliberation each year. This creates
certainty for both employees and budget planning purposes.
Transparency: The data sources and calculations are clear and accessible to staff, Council
members, and the public. Anyone can verify the inputs and understand how the
adjustment percentage was determined.
Balance: The formula combines stable national wage data with local market conditions,
ensuring our adjustments reflect both broader economic trends and the specific
competitive environment in which we operate.
Consistency: The rule eliminates ad-hoc year-to-year changes that can create confusion in
compensation management, enabling employees and managers to better anticipate and
plan for adjustments.
Market Responsiveness: By incorporating both national and local data, the formula helps
our compensation remain competitive without overreacting to temporary market
fluctuations.
Meeting Packet Page 35 of 39
Implementation and Next Steps
To successfully integrate this formula into our budget process, we recommend the
following approach.
The League PMI results typically become available in late January each year. During the
annual proposed budget presentation, staff will present the updated ECI data, PMI results,
and the resulting AGA calculation. This timing allows staff to incorporate the calculation
into early-year budget meetings, with the process culminating in budget adoption during
May and June.
As part of our commitment to transparency, each year's budget presentation materials will
include the calculation, showing the ECI and PMI inputs and the resulting AGA percentage.
This documentation will be available to Council members and the public as part of the
budget review process.
The formula should be implemented in alignment with the guidance provided during the
work study session, with the understanding that extraordinary circumstances may warrant
Council consideration of deviations. Any such deviations should be justified and
documented to preserve the integrity of the systematic approach.
Data Sources and Methodology
The PMI data comes from the League of Arizona Cities & Towns Salary & Benefit Survey,
representing the average percentage increase reported by peer municipalities. Our peer
group includes 28 municipalities in and around the Valley, and in most years, a substantial
majority (20+) provide usable data, ensuring a reliable basis for the PMI calculation.
The ECI data is sourced from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index
for Private Industry, Wages & Salaries, using the Q4-to-Q4 percentage change. This
provides a consistent national benchmark that removes seasonal variations and focuses
on the annual trend.
Peer Municipality Reference
The peer municipalities included in the League survey analysis represent a comprehensive
group of cities and towns in the Phoenix metropolitan area and broader Arizona region.
These include Apache Junction, Avondale, Buckeye, Carefree, Casa Grande, Cave Creek,
Chandler, Coolidge, El Mirage, Eloy, Florence, Gilbert, Glendale, Goodyear, Guadalupe,
Litchfield Park, Maricopa, Mesa, Paradise Valley, Peoria, Phoenix, Queen Creek,
Scottsdale, Surprise, Tempe, Tolleson, Wickenburg, and Youngtown.
This peer group represents municipalities of varying sizes and characteristics, providing a
broad perspective on compensation trends in the regional labor market where Fountain
Hills competes for talent.
Meeting Packet Page 36 of 39
Supporting Analysis
The accompanying charts illustrate key aspects of this proposal. The comparison of the
proposed blended AGA against actual Town increases from FY 2023 to FY 2026 highlights
where actual increases exceeded or fell short of the proposed AGA, underscoring the
importance of systematic adjustment for market conditions.
Meeting Packet Page 37 of 39
Additionally, the historical trends comparison between the Employment Cost Index and
Consumer Price Index for all civilian workers demonstrates the relative stability of the ECI
compared to the volatility of CPI. This visualization reinforces why the ECI serves as a more
reliable benchmark for annual salary adjustments than consumer price indices, as it
directly measures labor costs rather than consumer prices.
Meeting Packet Page 38 of 39
Conclusion
The proposed Annual Salary Adjustment Rule offers a clear, balanced, and market-
responsive framework for determining annual salary adjustments. By incorporating
national wage trends through the Employment Cost Index and local market conditions
reflected in the Peer Market Index, this approach supports competitive compensation
while maintaining fiscal responsibility.
Historical analysis indicates that applying this formula would have resulted in consistent,
well-reasoned adjustments, providing predictability for budget planning and transparency
in decision-making. It offers a structured process that keeps salary adjustments aligned
with both national economic conditions and local market realities.
With its straightforward calculation and built-in transparency, this approach can be readily
integrated into the annual budget process. Its adoption will help maintain competitive
compensation while ensuring a clear, consistent, and accountable framework that
benefits employees, Council, and the community.
Meeting Packet Page 39 of 39