Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTESpacket_PZ_09-13-21_0650_162TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2021            1.CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE       Chairman Gray called the meeting of September13 2021, to order at 6:00 p.m.   2.ROLL CALL   Present: Chairman Peter Gray; Vice Chairman Scott Schlossberg; Commissioner Jessie Brunswig (Telephonically); Commissioner Clayton Corey; Commissioner Susan Dempster; Commissioner Dan Kovacevic; Commissioner Rick Watts, Jr.  Staff Present: Development Services Director John Wesley; Senior Planner Farhad Tavassoli; Executive Assistant Paula Woodward  3.CALL TO THE PUBLIC       None.   4.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION OF approving the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the Executive Session Meeting of August 9, 2021, the Regular Meeting of August 9, 2021, and the Special Work Session Meeting of August 9, 2021.        MOVED BY Commissioner Susan Dempster, SECONDED BY Commissioner Clayton Corey to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the Executive Session Meeting of August 9, 2021, the Regular Meeting of August 9, 2021, and the Special Work Session Meeting of August 9, 2021.      Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously   5.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Ordinance 21-12, amending Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District, and Chapter 25, Entertainment Overlay District, by adjusting and clarifying provisions for outdoor seating in the public right-of-way.              Chairman Gray opened the public hearing. Mr. Tavassoli said that Ordinance 21-12 is to change Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District and Chapter 25, Entertainment Overlay District, by adjusting and clarifying provisions for outdoor seating in the public right-of-way.   Commissioner Watts asked if the permitting process includes indemnification so the Town is not liable. Mr. Tavassoli said that he was not sure but thinks it is implicit. Vice Chairman Schlossberg asked for a good definition of the town right-of-way and how would a restaurant utilize it for outdoor seating.    Mr. Tavassoli replied that the town right-of-way includes the street, median and the sidewalks. An example where there is outdoor seating encroaching in the right-of-way would be OKA Sushi on the Avenue. In response to Chairman Gray, Mr. Tavassoli said that there may be some sort of grandfathering for that particular restaurant. The Special Use Permit would contain stipulations that would ensure the outdoor seating area is accessible and that the sidewalk is ultimately owned by the Town. Mr. Tavassoli said that if alcohol is served outside an enclosed fence is required. An outside enclosure does not require overhead enclosures.  The amendment is not intended to address temporary (special) events. Mr. Wesley said that spilling out into the parking spaces would not be allowed.  Chairman Gray questioned if the process needed to include the Town Council approval or could it just be approved administratively by staff. Commissioner Dempster and Commissioner Kovacevic commented that this is a good opportunity for restaurants especially during COVID-19 times. Discussion ensued regarding right-of-way, center medians and sidewalks. Mr. Wesley commented that some purposes are issued by encroachment permits. Commissioner Watts said he would like to know for sure that indemnification is included in the ordinance and permitting process. Chairman Gray closed the public hearing.    MOVED BY Commissioner Dan Kovacevic, SECONDED BY Commissioner Susan Dempster to forward a recommendation to the Town Council to approve Ordinance 21-12, amending Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District, and Chapter 25, Entertainment Overlay District, by adjusting and clarifying provisions for outdoor seating in the public right-of-way, adding language that includes certificate of insurance    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2021 2 of 6   requirement, setting outer limits of area in question and good neighborly housekeeping and maintenance requirements.   Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously   6.HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON Ordinance 21-13 amending Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Sections 6.02, Definitions, Section 6.07, General Regulations, and Section 6.08, Sign Requirements and Allowances.        Chairman Gray opened the public hearing. Mr. Wesley said that in May 2021 the Council approved the new sign ordinance. Part of the process was the elimination of temporary signs in the right-of-way. Following that action there were concerns among community members and the council asked for further review and not to enforce until further notice. Mr. Wesley provided maps displaying commercial properties that would not be able to display signs. He said there were not many locations affected – around a dozen that could not put temporary signs in front of their businesses.  He said the purpose of the meeting is to consider possible amendments to the new Sign Ordinance to address temporary signs in the right-of-way.  The goal is to strike a balance between Section 6.01 Findings and Purpose – avoid visual clutter, promote health and safety, etc. following Council’s determination to not allow signs in right-of-way and allow signs for commercial needs. Mr. Wesley explained that in order to allow A-frame and T-frame signs in the Town Center right-a-way, staff added a new definition called the Town Center Pedestrian Area.  Mr. Wesley highlighted the following proposals to the Sign Ordinance: - allow A-frames in the ROW in the Town Center Pedestrian Area - provide an exemption for temporary signs (located in right of way) that are part of a Town approved special event - correct an oversight and allow an exception for Post and Board signs -correct an oversight and allow an exception for Yard signs - allow a time frame when Residential Directional Signs can be placed in a ROW   Mr. Wesley said that “off-site” and “off premise” are used in different parts of the proposed code.  They are the same thing, a correction will be made to use “offsite” throughout the document. In response to Commissioner Dempster, Mr. Wesley said currently A-frames are only allowed in commercial zoning with an exception in residential as a directional sign only.  One example would be for directions for an open house. Chairman Gray asked about the real estate post and board sign percentage that are in the right of way. Mr. Wesley said that about fifty percent of the post and board signs are in the    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2021 3 of 6   right-of-way. Traditionally these signs are put in the right-of-way closest to the street for better visibility. After the Town Council approves the code, the next step is education and the enforcement.  Enforcement implementation will start with the easiest – A-frames. Chairman Gray asked what the Town has to gain by forcing the post and beam out of the right of way. Perhaps the ordinance could be a little more friendly, a happy medium. Mr. Wesley replied that it removes clutter, visual distractions, and other impediments.  He suggested that the language could be adjusted to "may be located in the right of way but must be three feet behind the curb or edge of pavement." Commissioner Watts commented that seating is allowed on sidewalks, right of ways, but not signs.  Is it fair to have one and not the other?  In regards to signs, he suggested that an exception be made to allow for post and beam signs in residential areas.   Generally these signs are not as prolific for commercial area. Mr. Wesley replied that this is a good question and was brought up by the focus groups.  He said that signs on sidewalks were not allowed previously so it was not included in this revision. He said he got a strong sense from Town Council that they were not open to signs on sidewalks. Any of the suggested changes are fairly easy to make should the Commission desire.  There would need to be specifics stating that at least a ten foot wide sidewalk and six foot clearance on one side of the sign.  Commissioner Watts asked if the Town could incent business owners that have zero areas of right of way, to get a permit for signs that hang from their buildings.   Mr. Wesley said that projecting signs from buildings are allowed by Town Code but if they hang into the right of way, an encroachment permit is required.  A consideration for a blanket encroachment permit could be considered. Commissioner Corey suggested that Planning and Zoning publish a map showing allowable sign display areas. He said this would be helpful to the business owners, especially realtors. Commissioner Brunswig suggested that a footer be placed in the ordinance denoting the re-decision. Mr. Wesley said that once all this is finalized a map can be created that displays allowable sign placement areas.  In response to Chairman Gray, Mr. Wesley said there are fines, which recently doubled for sign non-compliance.  Commissioner Dempster thanked Mr. Wesley for including items from the discussion groups. Chairman Gray closed the public hearing.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2021 4 of 6   Commissioner Watts said he would like to see this move forward with minor adjustments.      MOVED BY Chairman Peter Gray, SECONDED BY Commissioner Susan Dempster to forward a recommendation to the Town Council to approve amending Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Sections 6.02, Definitions, Section 6.07, General Regulations, and Section 6.08, Sign Requirements and Allowances with the following stipulations:allow for post and board installations in residential areas, 3 feet from curb; request for staff to review blanket encroachment for the Town Center; opportunities for public access in respect to the map exhibits, to allow for installations in scenarios where there are at least six foot pathway of sidewalk.   Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously   7.COMMISSION DISCUSSION/REQUEST FOR RESEARCH to staff.     In response to Commissioner Watts, Mr. Wesley said that the electronic permitting system will be live on October 4, 2021  On September 28 th there will be a Builders, Developers, Contractors Forum that will feature the new permitting system.   Chairman Gray said he would like to request staff to address zoning and regulations for detox and rehabilitation facilities.      8.SUMMARY OF COMMISSION REQUESTS from Development Services Director.     Mr. Wesley said that staff would work on the request and prepare information to present at the November meeting.     9.REPORT from Development Services Director.     Mr. Wesley told the Commission there would not be an October meeting.    10.ADJOURNMENT      The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission held September 13, 2021, adjourned at 7:15 p.m.        Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2021 5 of 6   PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION _______________________________ Chairman Peter Gray                                                                                                                     ATTESTED AND PREPARED BY:                                                                                                                     ______________________________                                                                                                                    Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Meeting held by the Planning and Zoning Commission Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on September 13, 2021. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 29th day of September, 2021.                                                                                          _________________________________                                                                                           Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2021 6 of 6   ITEM 4. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 09/13/2021 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services Prepared by: Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant Staff Contact Information: John Wesley, Development Services Director Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION OF approving the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the Executive Session Meeting of August 9, 2021, the Regular Meeting of August 9, 2021, and the Special Work Session Meeting of August 9, 2021. Staff Summary (Background) The intent of approving meeting minutes is to ensure an accurate account of the discussion and action that took place at the meeting for archival purposes. Approved minutes are placed on the Town's website and maintained as permanent records in compliance with state law. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle N/A Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approving the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the Executive Session Meeting of August 9, 2021, the Regular Meeting of August 9, 2021, and the Special Work Session Meeting of August 9, 2021. SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to approve the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the Executive Session Meeting of August 9, 2021, the Regular Meeting of August 9, 2021, and the Special Work Session Meeting of August 9, 2021.  Attachments ES Meeting Minutes  PZ MM  WSS MM  D R A F T TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 2021            1.CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL   Present: Chairman Peter Gray; Vice Chairman Scott Schlossberg; Commissioner Jessie Brunswig; Commissioner Clayton Corey; Commissioner Susan Dempster; Commissioner Dan Kovacevic; Commissioner Roderick Watts, Jr.  Staff Present: Town Attorney Aaron D Arnson; Development Services Director John Wesley; Executive Assistant Paula Woodward   Chairman Gray called the Special Meeting of August 9, 2021, to order at 5:30 p.m.    2.RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION      MOVED BY Commissioner Susan Dempster, SECONDED BY Commissioner Dan Kovacevic to recess into Executive Session.   Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously   3.EXECUTIVE SESSION     A.Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the attorney or attorneys of the public body, pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03(A)(3).     i.Legal requirements and parameters related to group home and similar facilities     4.ADJOURNMENT The Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission adjourned  Executive Session at 6:05 p.m.       PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION    PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION   _______________________________ Vice Chairman Peter Gray                                                                                                                     ATTESTED AND PREPARED BY:                                                                                                                     ______________________________                                                                                                                    Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant CERTIFICATION  I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Special Meeting held by the Planning and Zoning Commission Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on the August 9, 2021. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 19th day of August,  2021.                                                                                         _________________________________                                                                                           Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 2 of 2   D R A F T TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 2021            1.CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE      Chairman Gray called the meeting of August 9, 2021, to order at 6:15 p.m.   2.ROLL CALL   Present: Chairman Peter Gray; Vice Chairman Scott Schlossberg; Commissioner Jessie Brunswig; Commissioner Clayton Corey; Commissioner Susan Dempster; Commissioner Dan Kovacevic; Commissioner Roderick Watts, Jr.  Staff Present: Development Services Director John Wesley; Town Attorney Aaron Arnson; Senior Planner Farhad Tavassoli; Executive Assistant Paula Woodward  3.CALL TO THE PUBLIC     4.CONSIDERATION OF approving the regular meeting minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission July 12, 2021.        MOVED BY Commissioner Clayton Corey, SECONDED BY Commissioner Dan Kovacevic to approve the regular meeting minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission July 12, 2021.   Vote: 7 - 0 - Unanimously   5.CONSIDERATION OF a requested Special Use Permit to allow residential uses on a 0.58 acre property in the Community Commercial (C-C) zoning district at 17134 E. Kingstree Blvd., generally located at the northwest corner of Saguaro Blvd. and Kingstree Blvd.           Mr. Tavassoli gave a PowerPoint presentation that addressed: Purpose Location Request Review Standards    Staff Recommendation   Mr. Tavassoli said that this was a Special Use Permit request for 17134 E Kingstree Blvd.  The proposed project is a small mixed-use development for three buildings.  Two buildings would be eight live/work units for each building.  The third building would consist of ground floor offices and the upper floor would be four residential units.  The SUP request is to allow for a portion of the building to become residential units on the second stories.  The ground floor would be commercial units consisting of offices, break room, conference room, retail and café.  There would be a central courtyard with landscaping and outdoor seating. Mr. Tavassoli said that according to the General Plan 2020 this area is considered a Mixed Neighborhood with smaller lots and a mix of non-residential area.  The area was zoned and platted prior to incorporation of the Town for commercial uses which is still the Town’s desire to keep this a successful commercial center.  There is a common parking area with 174 (8 ADA compliant) parking stalls.  The twelve residential units would require 23 parking spaces. Should the Special Use Permit receive approval, staff would continue to work with the applicant on details related to the site.  Staff supports a recommendation for approval of the Special Use Permit.   Chairman Gray opened the public hearing.   In response to Commissioner Dempster, Mr. Tavassoli explained that the existing entrances would remain in the same location.  The term “over parked” is used to describe that there is ample parking.  There is no shortage of parking. The location of trash cans has not been decided at this time.    Commissioner Kovacevic stated that the parking is shared at this site.  He expressed concern that there are five unbuilt parcels that will have to share parking. He asked if staff had calculated the parking availability.    Mr. Tavassoli replied that there is a site plan review component to this project.  This is processed administratively.  During the review it would be on the applicant to demonstrate that there is adequate parking. Staff may require a parking study or other evidence that there would not be a parking issue.   Commissioner Watts commented that there is a lot of traffic on Saguaro and Kingstree Blvd. He asked if a traffic study was available.  Mr. Watts expressed concern regarding the building height and closeness to the street curb.   Mr. Tavassoli said that a traffic study was not provided.  When a property is subject to rezone, especially if it involves more intense use, a traffic study or information may be required.  At this point staff would not be asking for a traffic study since the zoning is established. Since this is a commercial zoning district, there is a zero setback.   In response to Commissioner Kovacevic, Mr. Tavassoli replied that the site plan is approved administratively. It does not require the Planning and Zoning Commission’s approval.        Commissioner Kovacevic said he would like to see a parking plan submittal as if the five    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 2 of 12   commercial lots were built out and the vacant restaurant was operating.   Chairman Gray commented that the parking could become even more compounded if the second story residences are decoupled.  That situation would require even more parking.  Most of the units are two bedroom, assuming a two people minimum to each unit also increases the need for more parking.  He said although by right the building has a zero setback, there are redenies involved surrounded by a residential area.     Commissioner Dempster pointed out that the proposed property is surrounded by buildings that are second stories or as tall as a second story.   Mr. Tavassoli pointed out that the twenty-five feet is the maximum height allowed.   At Chairman Gray’s request, Mr. Tavassoli read from the opposition letter ( attached hereto and made a part hereof) submitted by the Saguaro Ridge Villas Association: “As to the proposed residential use for live-work situations, including the luxury condominiums, what happens if some or none of the units are owner occupied?  Does the ordinance limit rentals (daily or weekly) in this zone?”   Mr. Tavassoli said that stipulations can be placed on this Special Use Permit that the live/work units remain integrated.   Chairman Gray said that he does not suggest that situation in this case, but suggested to review parking ratio and quantity of spaces more closely.   Commissioner Brunswig said that there seems to be a lot of SUP's submitted recently.  She asked if there is follow up after the SUP is approved.   Mr. Tavassoli replied that this SUP is coupled with a site plan review request. They are two separate submittals. The site plan is reviewed administratively where the details include architecture, parking and any other pertinent information.    The applicant Dan Kaufmann addressed the Commission. He said he has been in Fountain Hills for twenty-eight years and has developed successful projects in Town over the years.   In response to the Commissioners questions and comments he said that there are 2-3 dumpsters that would be used by all the tenants.  The zoning for this plat allows two-story buildings.  There is a ten-foot landscape easement, it is not considered a zero lot line. He gave a brief description of the project.  The office area will consist of 18 unit suites, conference room and a break room for coffee copies, etc. and outdoor seating and a courtyard.  There will be four two-bedroom luxury condos above the offices with patio’s front and rear.  This will offer the condo tenant an office below.  He said this is more of a boutique setting.  Offices could also be on the second floor. Some examples of lower level businesses would be an art studio, nail salon, bagel and pizza shops.  He said that this will attract small entrepreneur businesses to Fountain Hills.  This project will create a vibrant livable town. The town needs to adapt to a changing market.  Covid has changed the way business is conducted.  Live/work offices cut down on commute time and promote productivity.  He concluded by saying that he appreciates any support the Commissioner can provide.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 3 of 12     Commissioner Corey said he appreciates that there is a ten -foot landscape space. He asked if Mr. Kaufmann had ever developed a similar project.   Mr. Kaufmann said he developed a project in Mesa which consisted of one hundred fifty-three apartments and a similar one in Colorado.   In response to Vice Chairman Schlossberg, Mr. Kaufmann said he came up with the design and elevations for this project.  He said that he has received inquiries already because people want new fresh spaces. He said that he has not decided to sell these units or rent the units.                 Ed Stizza, Fountain Hills resident, addressed the Commission.  He said that the building density for this project is too much for that property size, especially for a corner lot.    Tom Frank, Fountain Hills resident, said that he appreciates the project but is concerned about the traffic and the amount of square footage crammed into the property size.   Tim Hoogstead, Fountain Hills resident, said he moved to Fountain Hills from Kirkland to Park Place. The majority of the parking places in the entire town are under parked. The concept of office retail first floor and family living above has been around since the turn of the century – it has proven successful.   Dan Damonski, owner of L’Ediifice, commercial building adjacent to the proposed project, said that prior to the pandemic, he had eleven out of thirteen units rented or occupied. He said that he loves Fountain Hills and would have loved to have had something like this available to him when he was looking for a home. He said this definitely needs to be developed and there is a problem if this lot remained vacant for fifty years. He does not see any issues with parking, even when L’Ediifice is at eighty percent occupancy, there is ample parking including the parking located at the building's backside.  He said he supports this project moving forward.   Lorraine Vlachos, Fountain Hills resident, said that she has been in the town for twenty-two years.  She referenced the vacant commercial buildings throughout town and said that if we cannot keep the existing buildings full why would more need to be built. She said that it should be known exactly what is going in the units before the project is approved.      Ross Souzzi, Fountain Hills resident and business owner, said that this is a good project.  Dan Kaufmann is a man of integrity who will complete the project.  He is not going to leave it unfinished.   Aaron Brown, Fountain Hills resident, said that he cannot think of a similar area in Fountain Hills where the residential parking is just in an open lot with no covering or a structure.   Chairman Gray closed the public hearing.      Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 4 of 12   In response to Chairman Gray, Mr. Kaufmann said that the price point will be reflected in the market value.  He said he agrees it needs to be affordable.  Each unit will have its own water meter.  He said he would review the option of covered parking.  He said these units will be of a smaller scale in comparison to the vacant store fronts in the Bashas' shopping center.   Commissioner Kovacevic expressed concern regarding the parking allocation once the area is built out.   He said he was not sure he could support the project without more information.   Mr. Kaufmann said that he could work with staff on the parking.   Commissioner Watts said that he too has concerns regarding parking, traffic and the architecture of the building. He said the building does not fit well with the neighborhood.   Chairman Gray commented that it seems like this project wants to be something that wants to be much bigger on a postage stamp and doesn’t serve the Town’s general plan.   Commissioner Kovacevic asked if a motion could be made to include parking calculations, with build out.   Chairman Gray said that the motion could be made to include required parking calculations before the project is presented to council or to make a motion to continue at a future date.    Commissioner Dempster said, who knows when the rest of the vacancies would be filled. Parking cannot be figured out unless the businesses are known.  The parking lot is pretty much empty. The restaurant has been vacant for at least eight years. It would be hard to calculate without having all the required information.   Mr. Tavassoli gave an example of possible uses and their parking requirements in the CC zoning district. He said that a medical clinic would require one parking space per fifty square feet.  A residential use such as a two-bedroom condo would require two spaces and for each unit a quarter for guest parking. In that respect for residential is less impactful.     In response to Chairman Gray, Mr. Tavassoli said that in relation to the General Plan this is a"neighborhood character area" that clearly states the town would encourage a mixture of uses given the correct zoning.      MOVED BY Commissioner Susan Dempster, SECONDED BY Commissioner Jessie Brunswig to forward a recommendation to the Town Council to approve a Special Use Permit to allow residential uses in the Commercial zoning district at 17134 East Kingstree Blvd.    Vote: 3 - 4     Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 5 of 12    Vote: 3 - 4   NAY: Chairman Peter Gray   Vice Chairman Scott Schlossberg   Commissioner Dan Kovacevic   Commissioner Roderick Watts, Jr.    6.REVIEW AND DISCUSS provisions of the Town's Sign Regulations (Chapter 6 of the Zoning Ordinance) including but not limited to: A-frame, Post and Board, Yard, and Residential Directional signs.        Mr. Wesley told the Commission the new sign ordinance was adopted by council in May 2021. Staff worked to update the sign code to remove content to be in line with the U. S. Supreme Court decision Reed V. Town of Gilbert. One of the changes that council made to the code was to prohibit signs in the right-of-way. This caused concern from the community.  Council then asked Town staff not to enforce the change until further research and discussion took place among staff, the community, focus groups and feedback from the Commission.  Tonight, is for discussion purposes.  The goal is to return in September for any specific changes and then on to the Town Council. Mr. Wesley told the commission he met with staff internally and with the business focus group and the realtor focus group. Mr. Wesley said that it seems Council’s main concern in regards to allowing signs in the right-of-way are the aesthetics such as the number of signs and clutter it creates and the issues that go with that.  It can be distracting to drivers.  Mr. Wesley said that other comments were made regarding social media options and mapping options to replace signs.  He said determining the right-of-way has been a challenge. He said it is a challenge not only for the public but also for staff. He reminded the Commission that sign content cannot be regulated.  Mr. Wesley reviewed the possible sign code modifications options. He asked the Commission for feedback regarding each sign type. The proposed changes to location and A-frames are as follows: Section 6.07 B. Sign Location, Prohibited Locations 2.  Prohibited Locations  Within, on, or projecting over the right-of-way, including within center medians, unless specifically provided for in this Sign Ordinance, or as allowed through Town approval of a Special Event Permit.  a. Section 6.08 A. Sign Types 1. A-Frame and T-Frame Signs d. Location.  Shall not be used as an off-premisesite sign, except when used as a residential directional sign or as provided below: i.             On property held in common by members of a property owner’s association or ii.  Oon property owned by the business owner’s landlord, but not within any designated parking or loading area .    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 6 of 12   iiiii.         Along a public street subject to:As a Residential Directional Sign as provided in Section 6.08 D. iii.           Within the Town Center Pedestrian area, may be located in the Town right-of-way adjacent to the property provided:    Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or sidewalk;1. Shall not be located in any median;2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area; and,3. Shall be at least three (3) feet from any curb4. Section 6.08 A. Sign Types 1. A-Frame and T-Frame Signs d. Location.  Shall not be used as an off-site sign, except as provided below: i.             On property held in common by members of a property owner’s association or on property owned by the business owner’s landlord, but not within any designated parking or loading area. ii.            As a Residential Directional Sign as provided in Section 6.08 D. iii.           Within the Town Center Pedestrian area, may be located in the Town right-of-way adjacent to the property provided:  Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or sidewalk;1. Shall not be located in any median;2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area; and,3. Shall be at least three (3) feet from any curb4. Section 6.02 Definitions Town Center Pedestrian Area:  The Town Center Pedestrian Area is designed as shown in the figure attached. Chairman Gray commented that last month the Commission decided that the noise ordinance could not be enforced with decibel meters, how in the world can sign placement be enforced.  He said he believes that this is lip service to address an underlying issue of the perception or reality - the signs create clutter and the signs are not taken down at night. Mr. Wesley replied that sign code enforcement is a challenge. There are two code compliance officers and one works on the weekends.  They will continue to enforce the sign ordinance the best possible way.  The town manager has agreed to put more resources toward enforcement if the Council desires. It is difficult for the average citizen as well as enforcement to know where the curb is located in relation to the right-of-way, it isn’t always clear.   Chainman Gray suggested that the focus could be on the sign uniformity instead of placement. He referenced the chalkboard type sign displaced on Saguaro Blvd. Commissioner Dempster said that most of the public doesn’t even know there is a sign ordinance and how to comply with it. She asked if there was factual data stating that there are a number of complaints and safety issues.    Mr. Wesley said that there are no reports or data available but it is considered a    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 7 of 12   Mr. Wesley said that there are no reports or data available but it is considered a distraction if signs are placed in the right- of-way. Commissioner Corey said that he agrees with Chairman Gray. He said that this has become such a complicated process. It is very difficult for businesses to comply.  One focus should be that the signs cannot remain displayed overnight.  Another controllable issue would be to address safety.    Vice Chairman Schlossberg commented that it is evident by public comments on social media that the sign issue has been blown way out of proportion. It affects businesses livelihood. It should be a simple and easy to follow ordinance. Commissioner Dempster pointed out that it would be a huge negative impact to businesses by not allowing directional signs in the ROW of major arterial streets such as Fountain Hills Blvd., Palisades Blvd. and Shea Blvd. Mr. Wesley said he wanted to complete the discussion regarding A-frame signs. Chairman Gray suggested a fee for A-frame signs issued by the town. The signs should be uniform similar to the chalk board A-frame sign recently displayed on Saguaro Blvd.    The Commission concluded that they really do not have an issue with A-frame signs allowed in the right-a-way. Mr. Wesley went on to discuss the proposed change to Post and Board Signs as follows: Section 6.08 A. Sign Types 12. Post and Board Signs d.            Location:  Shall not be located within the public right-of way.   Shall not be used as an off-site sign, except on property held in common by members of a property owner’s association or on property owned by the business owner’s landlord, but not within any designated parking or loading area. i. Shall not be located within the public right-of way.  However, in commercial and industrial zoning districts where buildings are built to the property line or in any zoning district where topography limits visibility behind the right-of-way, an encroachment permit may be requested to allow sign placement within the right-of-way provided all portions of the sign structure and sign face are at least three (3) feet from the edge of pavement and at least three (3) feet from any public sidewalk. ii.   12. Post and Board Signs d.            Location:   Shall not be used as an off-site sign, except on property held in common by members of a property owner’s association or on property owned by the business owner’s landlord, but not within any designated parking or loading i.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 8 of 12   area. Shall not be located within the public right-of way.  However, in commercial and industrial zoning districts where buildings are built to the property line or in any zoning district where topography limits visibility behind the right-of-way, an encroachment permit may be requested to allow sign placement within the right-of-way provided all portions of the sign structure and sign face are at least three (3) feet from the edge of pavement and at least three (3) feet from any public sidewalk. ii. Chairman Gray said that since the post and board sign act as a mailbox and should have a little more leeway.  He said he liked the idea of the encroachment permit to ensure that underground utilities are protected and not harmed. In response to Commissioner Watts, Mr. Wesley replied that the right-of-way and easement are not synonymous. The right-of-way remains under the Town’s control. The easement is owned by the property owner but used by the utilities.  The Town is launching an electronic software permitting system in October 2021.  In response to Chairman Gray, Commission Dempster said that most of the post and board signs are placed on private property.  She said that determining where the right-of-way is located is not an easy process. Staff pointed out that in the past A-frame sign permits were issued by the Town for five dollars.  The sign holder would receive a sticker to place on their sign to show compliance.  It was a challenge to maintain with the limited staff on hand.  Mr. Wesley reviewed the proposed yard sign changes: Section 6.08 A. Sign Types 17. Yard Signs d.            Location:   Shall not be used as an off-site sign, except on property held in common by members of a property owner’s association or on property owned by the business owner’s landlord, but not within any designated parking or loading area. i. Shall not be located within the public right-of-way, except when used as a  Residential Directional Sign as provided in Section 6.08 D. ii. 17. Yard Signs d.            Location:  i.      Shall not be used as an off-site sign, except on property held in common by members of a property owner’s association or on property owned by the business owner’s landlord, but not within any designated parking or loading area. ii.     Shall not be located within the public right-of-way, except when used as a Residential Directional Sign as provided in Section 6.08 D. In response to Commissioner Corey, Mr. Wesley said that since the sign is not allowed in the right-of-way they are allowed to remain displayed overnight.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 9 of 12   Chairman Gray referenced the original recommendation that mirrored the code regarding so many feet from the curb. Mr. Wesley provided some options that he said could be mixed and matched: Option 1 (currently approved ordinance) 3.            Shall not be located within the public right-of-way. Option 2 (continues to not allow these signs in ROW on major arterials) 3.            Shall not be located within the public right-of-way associated with Shea,  Palisades, Saguaro or Fountain Hills Boulevards and shall not be located within the public right of way of any other street except between the hours of 7:00 am and 5:00 pm on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays.  When located in the right-of-way, shall be placed at least three (3) feet from the curb or edge of pavement and at least three (3) feet from any sidewalk. Option 3 (Requires specific, larger setback from major arterials) 3.            Shall not be located within the public right-of-way, except as follows.: i.              With the exception of Shea Boulevard, between the hours of 7:00 am to 5:00 pm on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays may be placed: a.            Within the right-of-way for Palisades, Saguaro and Fountain Hills Boulevards at least ten (10) feet from the curb and three (3) feet from any sidewalk b.            For any other street, shall be placed at least three (3) feet from the curb or edge of pavement and at least three (3) feet from any sidewalk. Option 4 (allows such signs in any ROW, except Shea during the given time frame) 3.            Shall not be located within the public right-of-way of Shea Boulevard at any time, but are within the public right of way of any other street between the hours of 7:00 am and 5:00 pm on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays.  When located in the right-of-way, shall be placed at least three (3) feet from the curb or edge of pavement and at least three (3) feet from any sidewalk. The Commission agreed that moving forward option four was the best choice. It was suggested the timeframe should read “sunup to sunset.” In response to Commissioner Watts Mr. Wesley said that as the code was reviewed some details came up regarding special event signs.  Special event sign approval would be reviewed during the special event application process. Commissioner Watts suggested that adding details regarding special event signs would benefit the ordinance. Chairman Gray said he would like to see signs not allowed within 200 feet of the major intersections. He also referenced Sonoma, California using wayfinding signs for businesses instead of mismatched individual signs. Commissioner Brunswig shared a comment that was passed on to her by a business owner.  She told Commissioner Brunswig that everyone wants to draw people to town, to shop and attend events. Signs are important part of making that happen.       Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 10 of 12     No one from the public asked to speak.      7.COMMISSION DISCUSSION/REQUEST FOR RESEARCH to staff.     None   8.SUMMARY OF COMMISSION REQUESTS from Development Services Director.     None   9.REPORT from Development Services Director.     Mr. Wesley said there will be a meeting in September to discuss the sign ordinance and one new text amendment.  The Town will be launching the new on-line permitting system October 1, 2021.    10.ADJOURNMENT      The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission held August 9, 2021, adjourned at 8:41 p.m.     PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION _______________________________ Vice Chairman Peter Gray                                                                                                                     ATTESTED AND PREPARED BY:                                                                                                                     ______________________________                                                                                                                    Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant   CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Meeting held by the Planning and Zoning Commission Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on the August 9, 2021. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 19th day of August, 2021.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 11 of 12                                                                                           _________________________________                                                                                           Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 12 of 12   D R A F T TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL WORK SESSION OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 2021            1.CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE      Chairman Gray called the Special Work Session of August 9, 2021, to order at 8:44 p.m.   2.ROLL CALL   Present: Chairman Peter Gray; Vice Chairman Scott Schlossberg; Commissioner Jessie Brunswig; Commissioner Clayton Corey; Commissioner Susan Dempster; Commissioner Dan Kovacevic; Commissioner Roderick Watts, Jr.  Staff Present: Development Services Director John Wesley; Town Attorney Aaron Arnson; Senior Planner Farhad Tavassoli; Executive Assistant Paula Woodward  3.REVIEW AND DISCUSS regulations and policies for Group Homes for the Handicapped and related facilities.        Mr. Wesley explained to the Commission that the recent public interest in detoxification facilities, sober living homes and group homes in general have created questions and concerns.  He said this meeting is for staff and the Commission to review and discuss the regulations and policies.  No action will be taken nor public comment taken. Mr. Wesley referenced the packet attachment published by the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development. He said that the Fair Housing Act and the American’s With Disabilities Act implemented measures for the Department of Justice, to incorporate different types of residences into communities. He said that disabled persons must be allowed the same access to neighborhoods and housing as everyone else. Mr. Wesley reviewed the following zoning ordinance definitions:  Family: an individual, or two (2) or more persons related by blood or marriage, or a group of persons not related by blood or marriage, living together as a single housekeeping group in a dwelling unit. Group Homes for the Handicapped and Adult Care: A dwelling shared by handicapped and/or elderly people as their primary residence and their    handicapped and/or elderly people as their primary residence and their resident staff, who live together as a single housekeeping unit, sharing responsibilities, meals, and recreation. The staff provides care for the residents. A Group Home for the Handicapped and Adult Care does not include nursing homes, alcohol or other drug treatment centers, community correction facilities, shelter care facilities, or homes for the developmentally disabled as regulated by the Arizona Revised Statutes Section 36-582. Treatment Center: Facilities providing lodging and meals and, primarily, treatment, training or education as a part of an alcoholism or drug addiction program. Shelter Care: Short term residential care facilities providing lodging on a temporary basis, meals and counseling to individuals and groups such as, but not limited to, the homeless, pregnant teenagers, victims of domestic violence, neglected children, and runaways. There are wide range of group homes that could occur in the community but they are all treated the same under the code.  Currently the Town has sixteen active group homes.  Group homes for the handicapped and elderly care are listed as permitted in both single-family and multi-family zoning districts with the following provisions: Group Homes for the Handicapped and Elderly Care; provided, that: a. No such home is located on a lot that is within one thousand – two hundred (1,200) feet, measured by a straight line in any direction of the exterior lot lines of another group home for the handicapped and elderly care. b. No such home contains more than ten (10) residents. c. Such home is licensed by the State of Arizona Department of Health. d. Such home is registered with, and administratively approved by the Community Development Director or designee, as to compliance with the standards of this Ordinance.  Mr. Wesley said that sober Living homes are treated the same as group homes.  These standards are set by the state.  This was a hot topic a few years ago in Prescott. Sober Living Homes are for persons who have already been through detoxification and the initial treatment. They are re moving forward to the next phase of recovery.  The detoxification process is not part of a group home and would not be covered by a State license for a sober living home. In response to Vice Chairman Schlossberg Mr. Wesley said that the sixteen group homes in town include the senior care type. In response to Commissioner Dempster Mr. Wesley said that the definition for family of five is pretty standard throughout municipalities.   He explained that the detoxification (in treatment) is not in a home, it is at a facility. After treatment the next step would be a sober living home. Chairman Gray stated that staff to resident ratio is important.  It may be part of our mission to consider the model of care and review the number of residents allowed    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 2 of 4   too. Commissioner Watts asked if there is a required amount of supervisors per resident. Mr. Wesley said that the Town Code does not provide guidelines that require a certain number of caregivers per resident.  A review of the State guidelines could be helpful. Conversation ensued regarding what other municipalities choose in limiting the number of occupants and encouraging more supervisor’s to resident quantity. Mr. Wesley said that staff can research the number of occupants further since they may tie in to building code requirements and other factors.   In response to Chairman Gray Mr. Wesley said that the detoxification facility would not be provided for in the Town Code. Some concerns have come up that detox takes place in some Fountain Hills sober living homes even though it is not allowed.  Writing the code with more detail could help enforce and prevent that.  Mr. Wesley thanked the Commission for their input.     4.ADJOURNMENT      The Special Work Session of the Fountain Hills Planning and Zoning Commission held August 9, 2021, adjourned at 9:13 p.m.     PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION   _______________________________ Vice Chairman Peter Gray                                                                                                                     ATTESTED AND PREPARED BY:                                                                                                                     ______________________________                                                                                                                    Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant   CERTIFICATION  I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Special Work Session held by the Planning and Zoning Commission Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on the August 9, 2021. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present.    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 3 of 4   DATED this 19th day of August, 2021.                                                                                         _________________________________                                                                                           Paula Woodward, Executive Assistant    Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 9, 2021 4 of 4   ITEM 5. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 09/13/2021 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services Prepared by: Farhad Tavassoli, Senior Planner Staff Contact Information: Farhad Tavassoli, Senior Planner Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language):  PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Ordinance 21-12, amending Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District, and Chapter 25, Entertainment Overlay District, by adjusting and clarifying provisions for outdoor seating in the public right-of-way. Staff Summary (Background) Staff is initiating a request to amend the Town's Zoning Ordinance by adjusting and clarifying certain provisions in Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District (TCCD), and Chapter 25, Entertainment Overlay District (EOD), to allow outdoor seating areas for food and beverage service in sidewalk areas within the Town's right-of-way (ROW) with approval of an encroachment permit by the Town Council. Currently, the ordinance states that outdoor seating in sidewalk areas is allowed only in the Entertainment Overlay District (EOD) with a Council-approved encroachment permit. However, this section does not distinguish between sidewalk areas located on private property and those within the public ROW. Similarly, outdoor seating is allowed in the TCCD per Chapter 18, but does not include provisions for outdoor seating within the public right-of-way. Both districts are adjacent to one another on the Town's zoning map, transected by the Avenue of the Fountains. The EOD is north of the Avenue between La Montana and Saguaro, while the TCCD is to the south.   Proposed Amendment In order to allow outdoor seating for food and beverage in sidewalk areas in the public ROW of the TCCD with a Council-approved encroachment permit, it is proposed that language be added to Section 18.03.B.23 regarding permitted uses. The existing wording in the aforementioned section appears below, followed by the proposed wording in capital letters: 23. Outdoor seating areas for restaurants, delicatessens, cafes or bars with or without alcoholic beverage service, subject to the regulations of this Chapter 18 and provided that any outdoor patio with alcoholic beverage service must be enclosed as required by Arizona Revised Statutes § 4-207.01, as amended, except for the time during which a current and applicable barrier exemption, as granted by the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, is in place for the outdoor patio. SUCH OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS ARE ALLOWED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK AREAS LOCATED IN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, PROVIDED AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL, AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION. Similarly, the following wording is proposed for Section 25.02 E.: E. Outdoor seating areas for food and beverage service are allowed within the sidewalk areas LOCATED IN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, provided an encroachment permit is approved by the Town Council, in its sole discretion. Sidewalk seating is already allowed in the Entertainment Overlay District (EOD) with an encroachment permit. This amendment acknowledges the close similarities in function and character between the EOD and the TCCD and ensures consistency between permitted uses for the two districts, and also clarifies the requirement for a Council-approved encroachment permit for such areas that are located in the Town's ROW.   Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle General Plan 2020, Section III: Thriving Environment, Social Environment, Streets, Sidewalks and Trails as Social Connectors Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 21-12 as presented. SUGGESTED MOTION Staff will assist the Commission in drafting a motion as needed. Attachments Ordinance 21-12  ORDINANCE NO. 21-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 18, TOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, BY AMENDING SECTION 18.03. B. 23., AND CHAPTER 25, ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT, SECTION 25.02. E. TO ALLOW OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICE WITHININ SIDEWALK AREAS LOCATED IN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, PROVIDED AN ENCORACHMENT PERMIT IS APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL. RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 93-22 on November 18, 1993, which adopted the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to amend the Zoning Ordinance to revise Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District, by amending provisions related to outdoor seating areas for food and beverage service in Section 18.03. B. 23.; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-462.04, public hearings regarding this ordinance were advertised in the August 25, 2021, and September 1, 2021 editions of the Fountain Hills Times; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on September 13, 2021 and by the Town Council on October 19, 2021. ENACTMENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 18, Town Center Commercial District, Section 18.03 B. 23., Permitted Uses, is amended as follows: … 23. Outdoor seating areas for restaurants, delicatessens, cafes or bars with or without alcoholic beverage service, subject to the regulations of this Chapter 18 and provided that any outdoor patio with alcoholic beverage service must be enclosed as required by Arizona Revised Statutes § 4-207.01, as amended, except for the time during which a current and applicable barrier exemption, as granted by the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, is in place for the outdoor patio. SUCH OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS ARE ALLOWED WITHIN SIDEWALK AREAS LOCATED IN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, PROVIDED AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL, AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION. … SECTION 3. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 25, Town Center Commercial District, Section 25.02 E., Provisions Applicable to all Uses, is amended as follows: E. Outdoor seating areas for food and beverage service are allowed within the sidewalk areas LOCATED IN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, provided an encroachment permit is approved by the Town Council, in its sole discretion. … SECTION 4. The Mayor, the Town Manager, the Town Clerk and the Town Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to execute all documents and take all steps necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 19th day of October, 2021. FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO: Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney ITEM 6. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 09/13/2021 Meeting Type: Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Type: Submitting Department: Development Services Prepared by: John Wesley, Development Services Director Staff Contact Information: John Wesley, Development Services Director Request to Planning and Zoning Commission (Agenda Language):  HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON Ordinance 21-13 amending Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Sections 6.02, Definitions, Section 6.07, General Regulations, and Section 6.08, Sign Requirements and Allowances. Staff Summary (Background) Following several work sessions in early 2021, the Council approved the new Sign Regulations (Chapter 6 of the Zoning Ordinance) on May 18, 2021.  During the review by the Council there was significant discussion regarding allowing temporary signs, specifically A-frame, T-frame, post and board, yard, and residential directional signs, in the public right-of-way.  In the final version of the ordinance, the Council voted to not allow these types of signs in the right-of-way.  In follow-up to that vote, however, the Council acknowledged this as an issue that should have further review and directed staff to explore options to address concerns and propose possible amendments. To address the situation, staff has:  Explored and listed the actual differences in the previous and new ordinance to see clearly what has changed (copy attached). Further reviewed the commercial and industrial areas in the Town to see where there may be challenges for businesses to place temporary signage on private property (maps attached) Met twice with two separate focus groups (one business and one real estate) to seek input regarding the challenges presented by the new ordinance and discussion regarding possible amendments. The action of the Town Council to not allow temporary signs in the right-of-way was an effort to provide a sign ordinance that is consistent with the Findings and Purpose statements in Section 6.01 of the Sign Regulations.  Several of these statements mention the need to protect the health and safety of the Town by reducing distractions and obstructions along roadways and avoiding visual clutter.  In considering possible amendments, staff kept in mind the intent of the ordinance and the initial decision from the Council to not allow these signs in the right-of-way, and has sought the minimum modifications that could be considered to address the concerns expressed while still maintaining the safety and aesthetics of the community. Following are the possible changes staff has identified to the Sign Regulations in an effort to balance these competing interests. Section 6.02 One of the concerns with regard to the ordinance is for businesses in zero setback situations where the building is brought to the property line along the street.  In those situations, there is nowhere to put a temporary sign except in the right-of-way.  This condition occurs primarily in the Town Center area where we have the Town Center Commercial District and the Planned Shopping Plaza Overlay District.  This area was designed to be a primarily pedestrian-oriented commercial area.  In these types of locations, communities tend to have more pedestrian activity and vehicle speeds are typically lower.  A-frame and T-frame signage is often considered appropriate and a part of the urban fabric of these locations. As shown by the mapping that has been done of the Town, most of the commercial areas throughout the town have room between any parking lots and buildings and the front property line.  This is because of the setback requirements in the zoning ordinance.  While there are some exceptions in the older parts of town, they are limited.   In order to allow A-frame and T-frame signs in the Town Center area where it is appropriate, while still limiting the use of the right-of-way in other areas, staff is proposing an amendment to Section 6.02, Definitions, to define a Town Center Pedestrian Area.  The proposed wording for this amendment is: TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA: THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA IS DESIGNATED AS SHOWN IN THE FIGURE BELOW. This defined area will be referenced in a modification to Section 6.08 A. 1. d. to allow A-frame and T-frame signs in the right-of-way in this area. Section 6.07 Through the discussion following Council approval of the new ordinance, it was noted that the total prohibition on signs in the right-of-way would impact directional signage that has previously been approved and used in association with large town events. Section 6.07 of the Sign Regulations addresses a variety of general topics associated with the location and maintenance of signs.  Section 6.07 B. gives general regulations on allowed sign locations and lists prohibited locations for signs.  To address this topic, staff is proposing the following amendment to Section 6.07 B. 2. Prohibited Locations:  a.         Within, on, or projecting over the right-of-way, including within center medians, unless specifically provided for in this Sign Ordinance, OR AS ALLOWED THROUGH TOWN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT. To avoid confusion whether signs would be allowed in side medians versus center medians, staff is also recommending the word "center" be removed in this section so it is clear it applies to all medians. Section 6.08 A. 1. d. Section 6.08 provides all the specific regulations for each sigh type.  Subsection A. 1. addresses A-frame and T-frame signs, and d. provides the specific regulations related to location.  The proposed amendment to this section are as follows:  d.         Location.  Shall not be used as an off-premiseSITE sign, except when used as a residential directional sign or as provided below: i.          On property held in common by members of a property owners association OR ii.         OOn property owned by the business owner’s landlord, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA. ii.         AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D. III. Along a public street subject to:WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA, MAY BE LOCATED IN THE TOWN RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE BUSINESS PROVIDED:  1.         Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or sidewalk, or in any median ; 2.         Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area; 3.         Shall not be located in a manner that poses a traffic vision hazard.; AND, 4. SHALL not BE located within a public right-of-wayAT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM ANY CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. This amendment will allow these signs in the right-of-way in the defined Town Center Pedestrian Area and as allowed in Section 6.08 D. for residential directional.  This addresses most of the concerns expressed in the focus groups. As part of the discussion of this topic, it has been pointed out that another sign type available is a Projecting sign, a permanent sign which projects out from and perpendicular to a building face.  These can be more visible to the traveling public when the building is close to the street.  The ordinance currently allows this sign type and requires approval of an encroachment permit should the sign overhang a public right-of-way.  A suggestion was made that the Town process and approve a blanket encroachment permit for the Town Center Pedestrian Area that would allow an individual property/business owner to receive approval of such a sign, subject to meeting the code requirements, without having to individually apply for the encroachment permit. There has been some concern expressed regarding not allowing these signs on a public sidewalk.  They were not allowed on the sidewalk in the previous ordinance so this is not a change.  Therefore, staff has not included any proposed changes to address this topic. Section 6.08 A. 12. d. This section of the ordinance provides the standards for Post and Board signs.  This sign type is allowed in all zoning districts and, historically, has been used primarily to advertise properties "For Sale" and "For Lease".  The previous ordinance did not allow them in the right-of-way but, due the constraints on some properties, had historically been allowed.  Unlike A-frame signs that are easily moved, they can become semi-permanent and are not moved on a daily basis.  Therefore, if one is improperly located there is time to work with a property owner to adjust a location.  Further, there is some concern with locating these signs in the right-of-way due to buried utilities. The proposed modification to the ordinance would continue to require the signs to be place on the private property, but allows approval of exceptions by the Town Engineer through an encroachment permit in two situations: in commercial and industrial areas where the building placement does not allow room for one on-site and in cases where the sign would not be visible from the street due to the topography.  The specific suggested code language is:  d.         Location:  Shall not be located within the public right-of-way. I. SHALL NOT BE USED AS AN OFF-SITE SIGN, EXCEPT ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA. II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. HOWEVER, IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE BUILDINGS ARE BUILT TO THE PROPERTY LINE OR IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT WHERE TOPOGRAPHY LIMITS VISIBILITY BEHIND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT MAY BE REQUESTED TO ALLOW SIGN PLACEMENT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ALL PORTIONS OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE AND SIGN FACE ARE AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND DO NOT OVERHANG A SIDEWALK. Note that there is one additional change being provided to this section.  Similar to the A-frame signs, these signs could be placed in locations which are not at the business location, but should not be considered to be off-site signs.  An example would be an office condominium complex that needed to advertise one of the units be available for sale or lease.  The post and board sign would likely not be placed on the individual unit location but at another location within the condominium where it would be visible from the street.  The ordinance as adopted did not specifically cover this type of placement like it does for the A-frame signs.  The first added section in the revision addresses this issue. Section 6.08 A. 17. d. This section of the ordinance provides standards for Yard signs.  This sign type is allowed in all zoning districts and, historically, has been used primarily to advertise open houses and yard sales, but has also been used as a contractor signs.  This sign type has, historically, not been used as much as A-frames for advertising businesses. The second portion of this ordinance modification leaves in place the provision these signs are not permitted in the right-of-way, except when used as a Residential Directional Sign.  This then refers to Section 6.08 D. which provides the standards for this sign type.  The specific suggested code language is:  d.         Location:  Shall not be located within the public right-of-way. I. ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY OWNER’S ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BUSINESS OWNERS LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA. II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, EXCEPT WHEN USED AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D. Note that there is one additional change being provided to this section.  Similar to the A-frame signs, these signs could be placed in locations which are not at the business location, but should not be considered to be off-site signs.  An example would be a dwelling unit in a condominium complex that needed to advertise one of the units be available for sale or lease.  The yard sign used for an open house would likely not be placed on the individual unit location but at another location within the condominium where it would be visible from the street or parking area.  The ordinance as adopted did not specifically cover this type of placement like it does for the A-frame signs.  The first added section in the revision addresses this issue. Section 6.08 D. This section of the ordinance provides standards for Residential Directional signs.  This sign type is allowed in residential zoning districts and along streets leading to the activity advertised on the sign.  Most often these signs are used to advertise open houses and garage sales, but could be used for any type of activity occurring in a residential neighborhood.  Item 1 under this section provides the zoning districts where the sign type is allowed and Item 2 provides the number (1 on the property and up to 5 providing direction).  Item 3 states the signs cannot be placed in the right-of-way. Council has had a lot of concern about this sign type given the frequent abuse of the regulations in the past regarding placement and, given the Reed decision, that lack of ability to regulate the message on signs.  Given the typical purpose for which this sign type is used (open house and garage sales) it would be a challenge to expect individuals to approach homeowners about placing a sign on their property and a possible annoyance to the homeowners to be regularly approached about having signs on their property.  It is also often a challenge to know where the right-of-way line is on a specific property which creates a problem for both the person placing a sign and for code enforcement staff. The proposed amendment seeks to find a compromise position that allows for the placement of this sign type in the right-of-way to serve their primary intended use while still maintaining some limitation to meet the purpose of the ordinance.  The specific suggested code language is:  3.         Shall not be located within the public right-of-way ASSOCIATED WITH SHEA BOULEVARD AT ANY TIME, BUT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OF ANY OTHER STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF OFFICIAL SUNRISE AND OFFICIAL SUNSET ON FRIDAYS, SATURDAYS, AND SUNDAYS. WHEN LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE PLACED AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. With this language, on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday's Residential Directional signs could be place in the right-of-way on any street, except Shea Boulevard, between official sunrise and official sunset each day.  Any other day of the week these signs would need to be on private property.     Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Based upon staff understanding of the competing interests involved in this section of the sign ordinance, the attached ordinance represents changes that could be made which maintain, to a significant degree, the desires and goals of the Council while allowing some increased flexibility in the use and location for temporary signage.  Staff can support any or all of the changes contained in the attached ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION Staff will assist the Commission as needed in crafting a motion regarding Ordinance 21-13. Attachments Ordinance 21-13  Areas for Temp Signs  ORDINANCE NO. 21-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 6, SIGN REGULATIONS, SECTION 6.02, DEFINITIONS, ADDING A DEFINITION OF TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA, SECTION 6.07 B. 2. a, ADDING AN EXCEPTION FOR SIGNAGE FOR TOWN APPROVED SPECIAL EVENTS, AND SECTIONS 6.08 A. 1, 12, 17, AND 6.08 D. 3 AMENDING REGULATIONS RELATED TO A-FRAME AND T-FRAME, POST AND BOARD, YARD, AND RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 93-22 on November 18, 1993, which adopted the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to amend Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.02, Definitions, adding a definition of town center pedestrian area, Section 6.07 B. 2. a., adding an exception for signage for town approved special events, and Sections 6.08 A. 1, 12, 17, and 6.08 D. 3. amending regulations related to a-frame and t-frame, post and board, yard, and residential directional signs; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-462.04, public hearings regarding this ordinance were advertised in the August 25 and September 1, 2021 editions of the Fountain Hills Times; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on September 13, 2021, and by the Town Council on October 19, 2021. ENACTMENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Signe Regulations, Section 6.02, Definitions, is hereby amended to add the following definition: TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA: THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA IS DESIGNATED AS SHOWN IN THE FIGURE BELOW. SECTION 3. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.07 B. 2. a. is hereby amended as follows: a. Within, on, or projecting over the right-of-way, including within center medians, unless specifically provided for in this Sign Ordinance, OR AS ALLOWED THROUGH TOWN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT. SECTION 4. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08 A. 1. d. is hereby amended as follows: d. Location. Shall not be used as an off-premiseSITE sign, except when used as a residential directional sign or as provided below: i. On property held in common by members of a property owners association OR ii. OOn property owned by the business owner’s landlord, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA. ii. AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D. III. Along a public street subject to:WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA, MAY BE LOCATED IN THE TOWN RIGHT- OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE BUSINESS PROVIDED: 1. Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or sidewalk, or in any median; 2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area; 3. Shall not be located in a manner that poses a traffic vision hazard.; AND, 4. SHALL not BE located within a public right-of-wayAT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM ANY CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SECTION 5. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08 A. 12. d. is hereby amended as follows: d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way. I. SHALL NOT BE USED AS AN OFF-SITE SIGN, EXCEPT ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA. II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF WAY. HOWEVER, IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE BUILDINGS ARE BUILT TO THE PROPERTY LINE OR IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT WHERE TOPOGRAPHY LIMITS VISIBILITY BEHIND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT MAY BE REQUESTED TO ALLOW SIGN PLACEMENT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ALL PORTIONS OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE AND SIGN FACE ARE AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND DO NOT OVERHANG A SIDEWALK. SECTION 6. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08 A. 17. d. is hereby amended as follows: d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way. I. ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA. II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY, EXCEPT WHEN USED AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D. SECTION 7. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08 D. 3. is hereby amended as follows: 3. Shall not be located within the public right-of-way ASSOCIATED WITH SHEA BOULEVARD AT ANY TIME, BUT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY OTHER STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF OFFICIAL SUNRISE AND OFFICIAL SUNSET ON FRIDAYS, SATURDAYS, AND SUNDAYS. WHEN LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE PLACED AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION 9. In accordance with Article II, Sections 1 and 2, Constitution of Arizona, and the laws of the State of Arizona, the City/Town Council has considered the individual property rights and personal liberties of the residents of the City/Town and the probable impact of the proposed ordinance on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent before adopting this ordinance PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 19th day of October, 2021. FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO: Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney Southwest corner of Palisades and La Montana Right of Way line Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Right of Way Line Distance between Right of Way and parking area approximately 4’.Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Right of Way Line Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Right of Way Line Very little room for temporary sign. Could consider permanent projecting sign or additional wall signage. Right of Way Line Very little room for temporary sign. Could consider permanent projecting sign. Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Southeast corner of Glenbrook and Fountain Hills Blvd Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Approximately 4’ Northeast corner of El Pueblo and Fountain Hills Blvd. Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Saguaro Blvd. from Bond to Rand Area where Post and Board and Yard signs are permitted A-frames only for Residential Directional Sign Area where A-frame, Post and Board, and Yard signs are permitted Approximately 8’ between parking and right of way