The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRes 1991-30f RESOLUTION NO. 1991 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN 0 PO IN HILLS, RELATING TO THE ARIZONA CORPO TION S ON, nffl RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE ES Y ARRAL CITY WATER COMPANY FOR A WATER RATE I / C / WHEREAS, Chaparral City Water Company as r�ques e r e i crease d said rate increase must be approved by the A izona Cor a C ission' and WHEREAS, The Residential Utility Consumer Office h i di ated t t there are some unresolved questions relating to the inclusion f all Cent 1 Arizona Project costs in the rate base; and WHEREAS, The Mayor and Common Council wish to state there position on this matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills respectfully request that the Arizona Corporation Commission consider taking whatever action it deems appropriate to allow the Residential Utility Consumer Office to fully present its case as to why some or all of the Central Arizona Project costs should not be included in the water rate base as presently proposed by the Arizona Corporation Commission staff. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1991, by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona. ATTEST: Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Farrell, Town Attorney REVIEWED BY: Paul L. Nordin, Town Manager John M. Cuti llo, Mayor a r'- Lk anHik RESOLUTION NO. 1991 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, RELATING TO THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, AND THE REQUEST OF CHAPARRAL CITY WATER COMPANY FOR A WATER RATE INCREASE. (DOCKET # U- 2113 -89- 212) WHEREAS, Chaparral City Water Company has requested a water rate increase and said rate increase must be approved by the Arizona Corporation Commission; and WHEREAS, the Residential Utility Consumer Office ly did not request to intervene and become a party to this Case, thus did not appear at a Pubic Hearing held April 11 and 12, 1991, and now desires to present evidence and discussion as to the degree of inclusion of Central Arizona Project costs into these rates or those of future requests; and WHEREAS, Presiding Hearing Officer Rudibaugh stipulates that evidence as to how to apportion CAP costs was not presented at the Hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, THAT the Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills respectfully requests that the Arizona Corporation Commission reopen the Public Hearing on this rate case and allow RUCO to fully present options on the method of handling CAP costs in water rates used in Fountain Hills. PASSED this 16th day of May, 1991 by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona. John M. Cutillo, Mayor REVIEWED BY: Paul L. Nordin, Town Manager ATTEST: Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Farrell, Town Attorney 3 nk a-x *k RESOLUTION NO. 1991 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, RELATING TO THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, AND THE REQUEST OF CHAPARRAL CITY WATER COMPANY FOR A WATER RATE INCREASE. (DOCKET # U- 2113 -89- 212) WHEREAS, Chaparral City Water Company has requested a water rate increase and said rate increase must be approved by the Arizona Corporation Commission; and WHEREAS, the Residential Utility Consumer Office did not request to intervene and become a party to this Case, thus did not appear at a Pubic Hearing held April 11 and 12, 1991, and now desires to present evidence and discussion as to the degree of inclusion of Central Arizona Project costs into these rates or those of future requests; and WHEREAS, Presiding Hearing Officer Rudibaugh stipulates that evidence as to how to apportion CAP costs was not presented at the Hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, THAT the Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills respectfully requests that the Arizona Corporation Commission reopen the Public Hearing on this rate case and allow RUCO to fully present options on the method of handling CAP costs in water rates used in Fountain Hills. PASSED this 16th day of May, 1991 by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona. John M. Cutillo, Mayor REVIEWED BY: Paul L. Nordin, Town Manager ATTEST: Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William E. Farrell, Town Attorney j To Fountain Hills Citizens and the Arizona Corporation Commission: RE: PROPOSED WATER RATE INCREASE The Council has noted an increased amount of community discussion over the proposed water rate increase. The Town Council has diligently endeavored to promote a spirit of fairness and cooperation in the community. We suggest to all parties involved that if those qualities of cooperation and fairness are applied in this situation, that a positive outcome will be the result. It is important for all interested parties to understand some essential elements in this process. The Arizona Corporation Commission, with its three elected Commissioners, has total and complete authority in this proceeding. It is the Corporation Commission that will make the final decision in this matter. It is important to note that the Town Council has no, and we repeat no, authority whatsoever to schedule any rehearing or any other type of proceeding in this matter. The Residential Utility Consumer Office (RUCO) is charged with the responsibility to be the "consumer advocate" in these matters before the Commission. In this case, RUCO has publicly admitted their error in not entering this case sooner. However, they are now actively involved and they are now providing significant input into the process. The Council and senior town staff have taken the time to review these proceedings. This review clearly shows that this matter is complex and deserves careful consideration. It is also our view that the present proceedings, while arguably flawed in some areas, adhere to a basic doctrine of fairness and impartiality. The recently released proposed order issued by Hearing Officer Rudibaugh represents an understandable and reasonable attempt at compromise. RUCO's efforts to represent the Fountain Hills consumers in this case is laudable, and the Council would not oppose RUCO's attempts to pursue whatever options it feels are fair and appropriate. The Council would also encourage both RUCO and Chaparral City Water Company to carefully examine Hearing Officer Rudibaugh's logic and in the spirit suggested by Mr. Rudibaugh's opinion, continue to treat this situation in a reasonable and fair manner. The Council commends the Corporation Commission members personal interest in this case. It is noted that all three elected commissioners participated in the proceedings before Hearing Officer Rudibaugh. We are certain that Corporation Commissions' final decision will embody the concepts of fairness and reasonability. To our Fountain Hills citizens, we encourage all of you who are interested to take time to study both sides of the issue and, regardless of the outcome, do all you can to preserve a very precious natural resource, our water. Sincerely, John M. Cutillo Mayor c (This letter was approved by the Fountain Hills Town Council on 5/16/91.)