Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCopperWynd PADCopperWynd Resort and Club Planned Area Development Rezoning from R-5 Multi -Family Residential to Planned Area Development Town of Fountain Hills Original Date: March 6, 2017 Date as Amended and Restated: August 25, 2017 Owner: Palisades Resorts, LLC 13225 North Eagle Ridge Drive Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268 Applicant: Jordan Rose Rose Law Group pc 7144 East Stetson Drive, Suite 300 Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1a. Project Introduction 1b. Description of CopperWynd 2. General Location, Property Boundaries, and Surrounding Properties 3. Existing Land Use 3a. Open space 3b. Location, design and type of dwelling units 3c. Physical characteristics of the site 4. Application Purpose 4a. Rezoning of CopperWynd from "R-5 Multi -Family Residential" with a Resort Conditional Use Permit to "PAD (Planned Area Development)" 5. Uses and Development Standards 5a. Zoning District 5b. Permitted Uses 5c. Development Standards 5d. General Provisions 5e. Signage 5f. Parking and Traffic 6. CopperWynd and Fountain Hills 6a. Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance and PAD Rezoning 6b. Fountain Hills General Plan 2010 and CopperWynd PAD Goals 7. Public Art 8. Conclusion List of Exhibits Exhibit A Overall Site Plan Phases 1, 2 & 3 Exhibit B Existing Conditions Exhibit C Parking Study Exhibit D Traffic Impact Study Exhibit E Phasing Plan Exhibit F Phase One Site Plan Exhibit G Phase Two Site Plan Exhibit H Phase Three Detail Exhibit I Elevations 1. Introduction 1a. Project Introduction The time is now to transform an intimate boutique hotel into a magnificent resort that will undoubtedly become the most iconic resort in Arizona. Demand for resorts and luxury lodging in Arizona has increased greatly in recent years. According to STR Global, a hotel market data and benchmarking firm, the Valley's hotels and resorts posted year -over -year gains in every key lodging measure in 2016.1 Furthermore, the STR Global study found that demand for rooms in metropolitan Phoenix was up 3.2%, nearly double the national gain. This resort will attract visitors from not just Arizona, but from across the United States and around the world. Palisades Resorts, LLC ("Owner") of the highly -regarded CopperWynd Resort and Club ("CopperWynd") proposes a rezoning of CopperWynd from the current R-5 Multi -Family Residential with a resort conditional use permit to Planned Area Development ("PAD") in order to expand, and modernize CopperWynd and to establish a world-class resort destination in Fountain Hills ("Town"). Fountain Hills is a beloved destination because of many reasons, including its world-famous fountain that attracts thousands of visitors annually. The time is now to ensure that all of these visitors will have a place to stay in the Town itself and spend their money in the Town, instead of going to resorts in Scottsdale, Paradise Valley and Phoenix. An R-5 zoning classification is not suitable for Owner's plans of expanding and modernizing CopperWynd; that classification is geared towards providing and maintaining residential land uses and is too rigid in application. By rezoning to a PAD district, Owner will be accommodating development outside of the conventional zoning requirements in order to transform, beautify, and revamp CopperWynd. Owner seeks to add 35 feet to the height of the resort, raising it from 40 feet to 75 feet. The request for the additional height is to create a buffer from the natural unevenness of the site and to allow for building volume without interruption for the natural deviations of the site. Owner will also increase the current number of guest rooms from 32 to an ultimate total of 300. 1 Dawn Gilbertson, Andaz: Scottsdale's First New Resort in 6 Years, ARIZ. REPUBLIC, Feb. 3, 2017 at A5. Once the expansion is complete, CopperWynd will provide more luxurious amenities, ample lodging, and more opportunities for visitors and Town residents to take advantage of one of the most beautiful resorts in the state. See Overall Site Plan Phases 1, 2 & 3, attached as Exhibit A. This will be one of the largest and most impressive projects the Owner has ever undertaken in order to grow both CopperWynd and the Town's popularity among visitors. The revitalization will turn CopperWynd into a Fountain Hills icon, and a world-class destination resort sure to attract thousands more visitors who seek to escape winter and embrace the Town's beautiful temperate climate and close proximity to ample outdoors activities. More visitors to the Town means that nearby golf courses, restaurants, and retail stores will see an increased number of consumers as resort guests explore everything the Town has to offer. The projected revenue and tax impact for the Town was studied by the Owner with input from a world renowned hotelier, and it is expected that the annual tax revenues generated by CopperWynd will increase by an almost unheard of tenfold from the $160,000 in total sales tax receipts that were generated in 2016 to an estimated $1,650,000 by 2020. This increased sales tax revenue does not take into account the Town's overall increased tax revenues from CopperWynd's expansion and renovation as well as the increased tax revenue from all of the surrounding businesses. Most important, however, is that Fountain Hills will join the exclusive list of towns with superb resort offerings in Arizona, such as Phoenix, Paradise Valley, Scottsdale, and Tucson. The magnitude and potential of building "the next great Arizona resort" has drawn the interest of important corporate entities. One internationally renowned hotelier has expressed great interest in partnering with Owner to market the new CopperWynd all across the world. The incredible architectural design of the resort and its one of a kind setting in Fountain Hills will make it eligible for future national and international design and travel industry awards. Another benefit of the new CopperWynd would be increased property values for homes and condominiums located near the resort as indicated by the history of similar properties in the Arizona market such as The Sanctuary, The Boulders, and Canyon Ranch. Property owners who reside in the vicinity of these resorts have reaped a great deal of value and benefited immensely from the prestige of living next to world-class resort destinations. The project is a unique opportunity to create a Fountain Hills landmark which will allow the Town to better compete with its neighbors for resort revenue, bed taxes, and visitors from across the world. For example, the newly redeveloped Mountain Shadows in Paradise Valley, a boutique resort, will open later this year and will offer 183 guest room s.2 A Scottsdale resort, the Andaz Scottsdale Resort & Spa, recently completed a $75 million renovation and reopened last November with 201 guest rooms.3 Finally, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess also completed a $60 million renovation and added 102 guest rooms, bringing the resort's number of rooms to 750.4 These surrounding communities are aggressively adding and expanding their resort offerings and Fountain Hills has an opportunity to better compete with them by supporting CopperWynd in its mission to become a world-class resort destination. 1b. Description of CopperWynd One of Arizona's most luxurious boutique resorts, CopperWynd has received numerous awards, such as the Conde Nast Traveler's Readers' Choice Award, AAA Four Diamond Award, and the TripAdvisor Certificate of Excellence. Located in the McDowell Mountains in Fountain Hills, CopperWynd offers unforgettable views of the Sonoran Desert and Four Peaks mountain range. Currently, there are 32 guest rooms with views from private balconies, see Existing Conditions, attached as Exhibit B. Each room has its own fireplace and enjoys access to two large swimming pools, a mountainside lap pool, tennis court, and well-maintained, resort -quality grounds adjacent to beautiful natural open space. 2 Mark Nothaft, What Happened to Mountain Shadows Resort?, ARIZ. REPUBLIC, Nov. 29, 2016. 3 Steven Totten, Get a sneak peek of the $75M Andaz Scottsdale Resort & Spa, Phoenix Business Journal, http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2016/09/26/get-a-sneak-peek-of-the-75m-andaz-scottsdale.htmi (last visited Feb. 7, 2017). 4 Steven Totten, Scottsdale hotel continues $60M expansion, adding more than 100 new guest rooms, Phoenix Business Journal, http://www.bizjoumals.com/phoenixiblog/business/2016/0 I/scottsdale-hotel-continues-60m-expansion-add ing.html (last visited Feb. 7, 2017). CopperWynd is located in the Town of Fountain Hills, and is known for its incredible topography and natural environment in the greater metropolitan Phoenix area. Around 1.3 miles from the resort is access to the Connecting Trails project in the McDowell Mountains Preserve. Here, a new trailhead is planned that will allow visitors to more easily access over 55,000 acres of hiking, mountain biking, and other outdoor recreational activities. The access to the beauty and bounty of the McDowell Mountain Preserve is unprecedented and further builds upon the image of a world-class town, highly regarded for its iconic festivals, great restaurants, beautiful golf courses, and its namesake fountain. CopperWynd is also strategically located within a 20 -minute drive of Scottsdale's downtown and that city's numerous restaurants, art galleries, museums, shopping destinations such as Scottsdale Quarter, Scottsdale Fashion Square, and golf courses such as TPC Scottsdale and Troon North Golf Club. CopperWynd is also located a mere 25 -minutes from Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, making it one of the most convenient destination resorts in Arizona. The Owner purchased the property and immediately started a massive renovation of the entire resort building and the grounds. Owner spent upwards of $6 million during this renovation. Despite this renovation, however, demand for a more expansive CopperWynd has been overwhelming. Due to its location, CopperWynd is a popular option for those seeking to stay within a reasonable vicinity of these amenities. As a result of its popularity, 32 guest rooms are simply not enough to meet the current demand of travelers and visitors seeking to stay at CopperWynd and take advantage of both nearby destinations and Fountain Hills. Additionally, 32 guest rooms do not allow Owner to continue to provide an award-winning level of quality service, while allowing CopperWynd to remain a financially feasible operation. CopperWynd must be modernized and expanded in order to meet the surging consumer demand for a high-quality and luxurious destination resorts. For 17 years, CopperWynd has developed a reputation as one of the most luxurious places to stay in Arizona and the expansion, as well as the addition of the number of guest rooms, will undoubtedly solidify this reputation. In this economy, the scale of 32 guest rooms cannot generate the revenue to support the national and international marketing effort required to allow the resort to compete effectively with those in neighboring communities. 2. General Location, Property Boundaries, and Surrounding Properties CopperWynd sits on three parcels of land in the McDowell Mountains, measuring 16.51 acres in total. CopperWynd is located at 13225 North Eagle Ridge Drive in Fountain Hills, about a mile north and west of East Palisades Boulevard along Eagle Ridge Drive in the western portion of Fountain Hills. It is zoned R-5 Multi -Family Residential and is bounded on the west by the City of Scottsdale. Surrounding CopperWynd are the Condominium Villas at CopperWynd, an R-5 Planned Unit Development and a mixed-use residential development under construction to the northwest known as Adero Canyon. The closest single family residential district is to the west within the City of Scottsdale. 3. Existing Land Use CopperWynd opened in 2000 and the current Owner purchased the property in February 2015. Since that time, Owner has operated a boutique 32 guest room resort and Club, including a full service restaurant, pools, tennis courts, cafe, and Spa. CopperWynd consists of three principal buildings totaling around 42,500 square feet, as well as two parking areas, and resort amenities such as two large outdoor swimming pools, and well-maintained, resort -quality grounds adjacent to natural open space in Fountain Hills. Additionally, CopperWynd is home to Flourish, a stunning restaurant and lounge which provides an unbelievable vista of the scenic mountains with a great dining experience. The resort is also home of The Club at CopperWynd and The Spa at CopperWynd. The Club at CopperWynd has an active membership of over 300 individuals who enjoy access to the resort facilities and a world-class 5,000 square foot fitness center. The Club offers classes in yoga, Pilates, spin, and other group exercise classes. As a member to the private Club, local residents can enjoy the facilities; usually reserved for the resort's guests. CopperWynd's current event venue space is one of the most attractive and romantic in all of Arizona. Ceremony spaces include the Event Lawn, which provides a backdrop of the McDowell Mountains for weddings, and the Sonoran View Room, which offers tall windows overlooking the mountain vistas. Owner has hired one of the United States' most respected hotel and resort architecture firms to ensure that CopperWynd perfectly balances architectural innovation with one of the most beautiful view site locations in Arizona, if not the entire world. Owner has retained the services of Allen + Philp Partners Architecture & Interior Design, a highly sought after architectural firm that has designed and enhanced numerous resorts and hotels all over North America. Some of the Allen + Philp's most notable projects have been here in Arizona and include Scottsdale's Boulders Resort, Paradise Valley's Montelucia and Joya Spa, Sanctuary Resort & Spa, and Mountain Shadows Resort & Golf Club. This firm understands the needs of the Town and is enthusiastic to design a project that blends with and enhances the area's beauty. 3a. Open space There are vast amounts of open space throughout CopperWynd's property and these open spaces will be preserved and even further positioned to be enjoyed after CopperWynd's renovation. These open spaces allow for extraordinary views of the McDowell Mountains and the Sonoran Desert. Of the 16.51 acres, Owner plans to maintain over 15% of it as open space. Large open spaces have been centrally located within each of the three parcels that comprise CopperWynd in order to provide easily accessible recreation and gathering opportunities for the resort's visitors and guests. 3b. Location, design and type of dwelling units CopperWynd Resort is located off of North Eagle Ridge Drive. The expanded resort buildings shall allow for up to 300 guest rooms. An increase in height will allow Owner to consolidate these resort buildings so as to not harm the ample open space on the site. The overall design of the site takes into account many factors to draw inspiration from the natural environment and character of Fountain Hills. These factors inform the final design which places the various uses on the site in the best way. This results in the structures being arranged so as to not interfere with existing site lines, views and adjacent uses. In fact, great thought was given to moving the additional guest rooms to the north and central portions of the site as much as possible and to orienting the guest rooms such that they do not impact the existing villas to the south. The structures are held as close to Eagle Ridge Drive as possible, further eliminating potential impact on surrounding uses. The topography of the area buffers the distant residential uses to the west in Scottsdale naturally. This site configuration is a direct response to the goal of Owner and the development team to integrate this significant improvement seamlessly into the existing site. 3c. Physical characteristics of the site As mentioned, CopperWynd is located at the base of the McDowell Mountains and overlooks the Sonoran Desert. Many of the physical characteristics of the property are desert -based in nature and incorporate the surrounding environment. 4. Application Purpose The purpose of this application, submitted on behalf of Palisades Resorts, LLC, is to request approval from the Town for: 4a. Rezoning of CopperWynd from "R-5 Multi -Family Residential" with a Resort Conditional Use Permit to "PAD (Planned Area Development)" The purpose of this application's narrative is to discuss in detail what Owner proposes and how this proposed PAD will achieve each of the four goals for PAD districts in Fountain Hills as provided in Section 23.02, "PAD District Intent", of the Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance. This narrative will also discuss how the PAD satisfies Fountain Hills' General Plan 2010's Vision and Goals, all while revamping a small -scaled boutique resort that only caters to a fraction of visitors into one of the state's most popular resort destinations. 5. Uses and Development Standards If a PAD is approved, Owner hopes to expand upon CopperWynd's existing sterling reputation and to expand CopperWynd into an even more impressive resort. Once rezoned to a PAD, Owner will expand the number of guest rooms at CopperWynd from 32 to 300 luxurious guest rooms in a Phasing Plan, which is attached as Exhibit E. The plans for the additional guest rooms are to include most of the same amenities that are currently offered in CopperWynd's guest rooms, such as a gas fireplace, oversize deep soaking bathtub and separate shower, in a setting that embraces a contemporary color palette and design. In order to maximize open space and views, Owner intends to increase the height of CopperWynd's guest house lodging from 40 feet to the following: (i) for the Phase 1 building, 75' overall height on the southernmost portion of the building as depicted in Exhibit G, and 50' for the northernmost portion of the building depicted on Exhibit G; (ii) 60 feet for Phase 2; and (iii) 50 feet for Phase 3, each of which is depicted on the attached Exhibit G. This height increase will allow a more efficient use of this very topographically varied site. The current 40' height restriction is based on "adjacent natural grade." This jurisdictional ceiling becomes a reflection of the dips and jogs of the site's natural topography, creating situations where a natural cleft in the landform reflected in this ceiling could cause the removal of a hotel room. The request for the additional height creates a buffer from this natural unevenness of the site to allow for the required building volume, necessary mechanical screening and the dramatic overhangs that the design aims for without interruption from the natural deviations of the site. While renovating the resort amenities and expanding the number of guest rooms in Phase Two and Phase Three of the expansion, which is detailed and attached as Exhibit G and Exhibit H respectively, Owner will maintain the architectural and site design concepts started in Phase One. The new portions of the resort will reflect the direction started with the most recent upgrade to the resort. The renovated buildings will be designed to provide a more contemporary response to the Sonoran Desert climate through traditional architectural strategies such as deep overhangs, recessed windows, heavy battered walls, articulation, material selection, scale and massing, and textures that are in balance with the surrounding community. The new hotel wings will take cues from the deep massing of the existing clubhouse's pueblo style through the use of heavy battered walls that introduce a rhythm separating the resort rooms from each other in a way that is very reminiscent of the existing hotel wings. These deep overhangs create a passive response to sun exposure resulting from the building's natural east/west orientation. The building's form is also a reflection of the site's landforms creating courtyards and exterior spaces emotionally recreating the valleys and canyons found in the region. The resort's exterior material will also reflect this contemporized Sonoran narrative. The structures lightly colored stucco will act as a contrast to strategically place accent materials such as Copper cladding, dark natural tiles and flat work, dry stacked accent stone at key landscape features and a charred shou sugi ban wood finish at the guest corridors. 5a. Zoning District While the PAD zoning district is a standalone zoning district in the Town of Fountain Hills, it is necessary to establish a base zoning district from which the uses, development standards and guidelines are created. For the CopperWynd PAD, that base district is the L-3 Lodging District. Except where stated otherwise in this document, CopperWynd shall conform to the Town's L-3 zoning district. 5b. Permitted Uses Notwithstanding the uses permitted in the L-3 zoning district, only the uses below shall be permitted in the CopperWynd PAD. • Hotels and Resorts. • Restaurants and Cafes, including the utilization of an outdoor patio with or without alcoholic beverage sales. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 16.03 of the Town Zoning Ordinance, restaurants and cafes shall not be required to obtain a special use permit. • Conference Center and Event Center. • Athletic Club. • Gift Shop. 5c. Development Standards The Development standards for the CopperWynd PAD are designed to facilitate the development of a world class hotel and resort while respecting the surrounding area, natural environment and character of Fountain Hills. Minimum Lot Area: 43,560 SF Lot Area/Room: 2,000 SF/Room Minimum Lot Width: 145 Feet Maximum Building Height: Phase 1: 75 Feet (subject to additional conditions above) Phase 2: 60 Feet Phase 3: 50 Feet Maximum Lot Coverage: 60% Maximum Density: 19 Units/Acre Minimum Building Separation: 7 Feet Front Setback: 20 Feet Side Setback: 20 Feet Street Side Setback: 20 Feet Rear Setback: 20 Feet 5d. General Provisions Screening. All roof -mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from a point at or lower than the top of the mechanical equipment with architecturally integrated materials and design. All ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened to a minimum of six feet in height via similarly architecturally integrated materials and design. Screening, mechanical equipment, and elevator overruns shall be kept to a minimum but are not subject to the maximum building height restriction. Outdoor Entertainment. As a part of the normal business operations of any high caliber resort, outdoor entertainment shall be conducted from time to time. Accordingly, Subsection 16.04(B)(4), relating to outdoor music or speakers, shall not apply to the CopperWynd PAD. This shall include but not be limited to live music, amplified music, and the use of a public address system. CopperWynd has been designed to locate these uses where they have traditionally been and where they are buffered from surrounding uses by buildings and natural topographic features that will prevent any disturbance off-site. Nothwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the Town's noise regulations, as set forth in Subsection 5.19(A) of the Town Zoning Ordinance and Section 11-1-7 of the Town Code, each as amended, shall apply to the CopperWynd PAD. 5e. Signage Owner plans to utilize existing monument signage at CopperWynd's main entry points and will erect signs where deemed necessary to clarify the wayfinding for CopperWynd's visitors. The entry monument signage locations, quantity, and design will meet Fountain Hills' requirements for height and width and will also adhere to the designs themes carried throughout CopperWynd. Monument signs will not be located in places that could impair views of the Sonoran Desert or the McDowell Mountains. A monument sign located at the intersection of North Palisades Boulevard and North Eagle Ridge Drive is located in Scottsdale and is granted to Owner through an easement. This monument sign will not be impacted by CopperWynd's expansion and renovation. 5f. Parking and Traffic CopperWynd currently offers 186 parking spaces in three lots adjacent to Eagle Ridge Drive and a broad, centrally -located, circular entry and drop-off point adjacent to the primary building entrance to facilitate vehicular traffic. If the PAD is approved, the number of parking spaces will be increased to accommodate more visitors and guests who seek to enjoy CopperWynd's expanded resort as indicated in the Parking Study, attached as Exhibit B. In addition, Owner has commissioned a Traffic Impact Study and will comply with any improvements indicated as necessary, in attached Exhibit C. Additional parking will be constructed in coordination with the phasing schedule to ensure more than adequate parking is provided as the project moves forward to full buildout. As trends in vehicle trips are changing rapidly and will likely continue to do so, Owner may choose to submit, for approval of the Town, or authorized designee revised parking or traffic studies as each phase of CopperWynd develops. In an effort to provide ample parking for all intended uses and events at CopperWynd, a shared parking model may be used to secure off-site parking. To allow for this additional and overflow parking, the location of off-site parking shall be no more than 1,500 feet from CopperWynd. For safe and efficient travel between off-site parking, a shuttle system must be employed between off-site parking and CopperWynd. To reduce the vehicular trips to and from CopperWynd, shuttles to and from popular locations such as airports, area attractions and elsewhere within Fountain Hills will be made available to guests and visitors. Further reducing vehicle trips is a national trend of increased usage of ride -sharing services such as Uber and Lyft, which are becoming increasingly popular alternatives to rental cars, taxis and driving one's self. Circulation on-site will be managed through thoughtful design as well as valet service that will allow for fewer cars being operated by guests and visitors on-site, which is safer and more efficient. The attached parking and traffic studies address the use of valet service further. Member and Employee parking will be designated to ensure easy access and reserved spaces for both of those groups. This is another way that CopperWynd PAD makes use of intelligent design to increase the smooth functioning and aesthetically pleasing nature of the site. 6. CopperWynd and Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance PAD Goals and Standards The proposed improvements to CopperWynd will result in an iconic addition to the Town of Fountain Hills that is not only in keeping with the character of the Town but also beautifully designed architectural accomplishment that will be a point of pride and national destination, see Elevations, attached as Exhibit I. 6a. Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance and PAD Rezoning Chapter 23 of the Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance, "Planned Area Development (PAD District)" identifies the following goals and standards for a PAD district: • Encourage the planned development of large and small parcels or lots that are under unified ownership or control • Encourage and promote innovatively designed residential and commercial developments to provide greater opportunities for housing, recreation, open space, shopping and employment • Encourage a more creative approach in the utilization of land in order to accomplish a more efficient, aesthetic and desirable development that may be characterized by special features of this geography, topography, size, or shape of a particular property • Provide a compatible and stable developed environment that is in harmony with the surrounding area The purpose of a CopperWynd PAD is to provide a necessary and modern alternative and a clean-up of the conventional, yet outdated and inapplicable, R-5 zoning to allow a resort use to exist within a zoning classification that makes more sense from a planning standpoint. The existing CopperWynd is an important part of Fountain Hills and is an application of these goals. The proposed PAD will continue CopperWynd's adherence to these goals and standards. The application of these standards to the proposed CopperWynd PAD is provided below. Encourage the planned development of large and small parcels or lots that are under unified ownership or control RESPONSE: Each of the three parcels that make up CopperWynd will remain under the unified control and ownership of Palisades Resorts, LLC. Under the direction of Palisades, the redevelopment of CopperWynd can follow a unified and clear path to create a resort that will better serve the Fountain Hills community. Encourage and promote innovatively designed residential and commercial developments to provide greater opportunities for housing, recreation, open space, shopping and employment RESPONSE: CopperWynd's existing 32 guest rooms and resort facilities already include some of the most innovative designs as a boutique, luxury resort in Fountain Hills. Owner intends to continue to develop CopperWynd in this manner once the property is rezoned to PAD. Second, an expanded and innovatively designed CopperWynd will provide greater opportunities for employment of Fountain Hills residents. Once expanded, CopperWynd can accommodate more visitors and guests. To meet the demands of an increased number of visitors and guests, Owner will hire more employees to work in a variety of capacities at the resort, restaurant, and club. Additionally, as more of CopperWynd's visitors go into Fountain Hills, we expect to see increased hiring by the Town's business owners to meet this surge of customers. Third, CopperWynd's expanded recreational facilities under the PAD will provide greater recreational opportunities for not only the Town's visitors, but also for the Town's residents who live in nearby communities. Town residents are currently able to take advantage of CopperWynd's recreational amenities as members of The Club and as customers who utilize The Spa and Flourish Restaurant. These amenities are intended to remain accessible for residents, even after renovation. Fourth, Owner commissioned an economic study to examine the effect that increasing the number of rooms at CopperWynd would have on Fountain Hills Sales Tax Receipt revenue. Currently, CopperWynd generates $160,000 in annual sales tax receipt revenue from operations with 32 guest rooms. Owner anticipates that a 300 -room expansion will generate $1,650,000 in annual sales tax receipt revenue for Fountain Hills, providing direct financial benefits to the Fountain Hills community. Encourage a more creative approach in the utilization of land in order to accomplish a more efficient, aesthetic and desirable development that may be characterized by special features of this geography, topography, size, or shape of a particular property RESPONSE: Tourists and Fountain Hills residents appreciate and respect how CopperWynd's architectural design embraces high-end architectural and design concepts. Additionally, those who have stayed at CopperWynd never forget the experience of waking up and enjoying views of the nearby McDowell Mountains and other aspects of Fountain Hills' topography. Every guest room offers unmatched views of the mountain range and Sonoran Desert. All additional guest rooms that will be built under the PAD will continue to offer and accentuate this experience by through an upgraded approach to this architectural style and aesthetic design, with rooms that offer magnificent views of the nearby mountains. By referencing the nearby desert aesthetic, CopperWynd will continue to utilize the land in a manner that embraces the Town's special features. The Hotel's new wings will highlight the unique views and natural qualities that make both the site and the Town special while providing a forward vision of the potential that Fountain Hills has to offer. Provide a compatible and stable developed environment that is in harmony with the surrounding area RESPONSE: Since opening in 2000, CopperWynd has operated as one of the most popular resort destinations in Fountain Hills. CopperWynd embraces the mantra, "Nature created the views, while CopperWynd creates the experience." As such, its design has been compatible and in harmony with the surrounding Sonoran Desert landscape and will continue to be, even after the renovation and expansion. While expanding the buildings, Owner will utilize building materials and construction designs that already make CopperWynd an architectural jewel. 6b. Fountain Hills General Plan 2010 and CopperWynd PAD Goals In January 2010, the Town revised the Fountain Hills General Plan ("General Plan"), to guide growth. Chapter 3 of the General Plan, "Land Use Element", provides the framework for the Town's future land use development and expresses "the community vision and is a development guideline for future growth." The following section will discuss how an expanded CopperWynd can meet and exceed the guidelines provided by the General Plan. Goal One: Correct the imbalance of acreage in zoning districts to more closely reflect the Town's desired need/demand. Over the last several years, the Town's popularity as a winter destination for hiking, outdoor activities, and other recreational pursuits has skyrocketed. Additionally, the Town's proximity and accessibility to numerous Cactus League Spring Training venues makes it an ideal location for baseball fans to who are visiting the Valley during the late winter and early spring. As a result, the need and demand for suitable resort venues has increased. An expanded and renovated CopperWynd can satisfy this demand, all while retaining the charm and unique design offered by the resort as it currently exists. By rezoning this area of the Town from the impractical R-5 zoning district to a more suitable PAD, the Town can balance the needs of residential and commercial interests. Goal Two: Investigate the application of special planning area solutions. The PAD is a special planning area solution to meet the rising demand for luxurious resort amenities in Fountain Hills. After discussions with Town staff, Owner became aware that the current R-5 zoning designation is no longer suitable for resort enhancement and renovation. As such, a PAD is a special planning area solution that is mutually beneficial for both the Town and Owner. Once a PAD is approved and these three parcels of land are rezoned, CopperWynd can be renovated and expanded. The new CopperWynd Resort will become even more of an attraction for visitors from all across the world who want to enjoy, relax, and take advantage of CopperWynd's luxurious amenities. Owner anticipates adding to its on-site event venues in order to host small and medium-sized events such as corporate meetings, weddings, and family gatherings. In turn, more venue space will promote more day and evening activities for those seeking to host events in the Town, while also providing more recreational space for nearby Town residents. Goal Three: Expand the Town image beyond that of a suburb to incorporate a unique pro-business community identity. As discussed before, Fountain Hills is growing annually in size and popularity. More visitors seek to take advantage of both activities within the Town and those of nearby cities in the Valley. As the Town's identity is evolving, a pro-business community identity will allow it to attract even more visitors from across the world who seek to take advantage of Arizona's offerings, such as world-class restaurants, shopping, and golf courses. As discussed before, there are numerous examples of all three within a 20 -minute drive of CopperWynd. A renovated CopperWynd can also accommodate smaller events such as weddings and celebratory gatherings, and can host guests and visitors taking part in these events. With more visitors staying in Fountains Hills at CopperWynd, more will shop at and dine at the Town's shops and restaurants and will spend more money on both amenities in the Town and in the Town's vicinity. As more individuals and groups spend money in Fountain Hills, the Town's pro-business community identity will continue to develop and the Town's sales tax revenues will also Goal Four: Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent land uses. CopperWynd's renovation and expansion will maintain the expansive open space buffers in order to preserve and protect existing residential neighborhoods adjacent to the resort. Instead of expanding the resort by "building out," which will remove the existing open space buffers, Owner is proposing not to increase the amount of previously disturbed land, and ensure compatibility with the adjacent residential uses. Historically, values for properties located next to, or contiguous to, a resort hotel increase as the resort is made more luxurious. A prominent local example of this increase was seen for homes in the Mountain Shadows Estates East and West, where there was an increase in the price per square foot for these homes when a renovation and expansion plan was announced for a redevelopment of the Mountain Shadows resorts s Peter Corbett, Mountain Shadows redevelopmentplan might boost home values, ARIZ. REPUBLIC, Jun. 1, 2012. The existing flora, fauna, and other wildlife that make CopperWynd highly regarded by Town residents and visitors will be protected during the resort renovation. As discussed before, CopperWynd has expansive views of the Sonoran Desert landscape, McDowell Mountains, and incorporates the desert wildlife that make Fountain Hills one of the state's most beautiful places to live and visit. Special attention has been given to the site planning and building aesthetic for this PAD proposal to uphold the distinctive character of Fountain Hills and the nearby area. The design envisioned for the renovated CopperWynd will not only respect, but will also enhance the unique vegetation and wildlife that help sustain the Town's quality of life. Owner's intent in expanding CopperWynd is to provide harmony and congruence with the visions and framework of Fountains Hills, as defined in the General Plan. 7. Public Art Section 19.05(1), "Public Art Requirement -Landscaping & Signage," provides the following: "All development proposals subject to Design Review under this Chapter shall be required to provide one of the following prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 7a. Exterior public art of an appraised or invoiced value equal or greater than 1% of the cost of building construction and associated site work and signage; Water features using recycled water are preferred; or 7b. A donation to the Fountain Hills Public Art Fund in an amount equal to or greater than 1% of the cost of building construction and associated site work and signage. Owner intends to satisfy this requirement in two locations. The first is in a landscape feature just north of the arrival court, adjacent to a biking/hiking outfitter kiosk that is currently planned. This landscape element will take the form of a water feature that depicts water as it naturally flows through the Sonoran Desert arroyos. The second will be through an architecturally significant on-site chapel designed to frame the spectacular views and through the expansion of the outdoor patio area. Both are easily accessible to not only CopperWynd's visitors, but to members of the general public as well. If the proposed public art is either insufficient in value or not approved by the Public Art Committee, the balance of the 1% value shall be deposited in the Town's Public Art Fund prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 1. 8. Conclusion CopperWynd Resort and Club's proposed rezoning to PAD is in conformance with, and in furtherance of, the Town's zoning ordinance requirements for PAD's as well as the Town's General Plan. The current R-5 zoning is outdated and is no longer applicable to the needs of Owner, who is seeking to build CopperWynd into a resort with no rivals. CopperWynd's proposed zoning and overall density are fully compatible with the existing residential development in the surrounding area. The ample space, pedestrian -friendly design, and other amenities included in the expansion and renovation will ensure that CopperWynd remains one of the western United States' most popular and luxurious boutique resorts. We respectfully ask for approval of this request to rezone the property to a PAD. EXHIBIT A-Ovenall Siite Plana Thasies ], 2, & 3 •:E � J:vra-6-+'4a6R b„C�7 l �' / � � _ >�\ +ia ` -. 'tom .0 -�- � - 1rw. t.M _ ! ,.T ,y2. �� •yF � - . ��, . - _tip �� r � �` •.' ,� � �! � ' A' yt�r h . . ♦ o� am 01 '�Ir (p Room VHirtg North �a 110 keys a ,' Stf. Gk. L=it � + 4 � ` F ,♦ > }:z r1ty� �. ;� -_+;�, �a._ � 4v i r r r L-ast,ss' _ ■ �•y f . 1, Bike Existing r a Valet Clubhouse ?!�; 2 ` To rte.naln "'t% 12 i..+--ric..- }l iArF 'Iv€I� - �a rHaVr.s 11AlaN ,ofF•l' V - - tt i • �� , � � 1, �' - � �y. / - 140 keys Membership Facilities Expansion' i'+• •' ,:.,� i990sf of banquet space 41 Ex sting: '11a''s3r- tIle a ' � lfi i l ti ray -li' - w f''�,�@ r♦ \ _ •:. \. _ liwct Event_ ` A 1 Serb• ;k-' Arr¢ivaf LIQ --{ -/ • J '�' � � � - t�. / �y�' 1 � , _ ,� � 'ti. �. I fll.Y+h pR•G 9A j v-=� - � rJ 7✓ T'.. f �1'y r •��n q ueit L'\.. x'41 ."f R --A ;o Arr �` -•.' 1, '.F 1'� w..�a•� ., +-4 "'` - Court arCi'`Reso►ti`. FBCI�Ity sl Rooms M' xrk nan',' -rix + 50 keys _ R Banquet Space \/" 4 eazraz�r +� t • T Fa`sh� 4 •,. - �. a ti -2zs ao �. t �T^ -`� .� ` 1 •i / _ �""'�~.. � @5.25' \$�•� r " � , ` \ Fly1ND sac ,w � � �'♦ A �� 6 � � %1aYRrB 1lYL Mrrf j r�av� d�+s77'sr' Overall Development: r-rras7 Project Data l 5 V + }` ©7 Program 4.vN170.15-41 300 keys (previous 266 + 34 new elite r 11,760 sf meeting space j--� Y� P r�r $ f� 44 existing spa & restaurant to remain with wNo Carr Or sr»rso.us• �a ` � 'tri _ _ -- --- cle J,,, N 178-1,-421 expanded pool bar knss san ttusrr f0lHYD Nplt-' i Copperwynd Resort i]T14N Fnply FRlgs A. rp,nto'€, Mh. AZ Overall Site Plan AP1618 CO P P E R W Y N D updated Conceptual Planning Package Allen MM Partners RESORT & CLUB o• 20' 40' So' 160, EXHIBIT B-Exist nn Cond flomi N ADFRO CANYON CLC , 2004-0 715968 MCR. .\ 1412' 51 Nw?CM MACE a 9WLDR4 ' 2' 5RU= • \ WALL \`\ \ RETAM9NC \ L 5' STUCCO C�=ASENMr rOR \ WALL ® 1 \ f1E1AMlNG \ WA 16SF7t1trTr�A xa 'iri- q s waL Y \ b 4' MVCVG WALL wB# '\ 5 A' MIRr LANGSCAVFD \ti 4' MRCfIti1T}Lp111pN {E/?!'( AREA FEINF AV 5' rARAN6 WALL wR/ 5' RROUtlIT b4ON ` "Y oUNnERl3?0'JNP 10' k ` FENCE ON MP 70NfF•'t `FLAOSMAE R AND 5' wPOUPIT 20 29'177'16` PUCK FEM'L' DRAPYACC R=935-00' FA ENT \ 475.22• •. 4=2856 08 4 yc a FAiEP1.ACE FE TURE roLffp Ewr. `\ R=JDO.00• WAUSTLCrG BAR 5' MMU(7R Rpt FENCE LW .� Y L-454.52 ml ,1 ACT - T(P LK RErAA'ANG WALL /��1'y 1 Y'S7Uav pOpL `� 11I 1 1 WA U. r -- RETARYM R► 1 WALL 1 WATER\A� IXANY [71lM F'EN([ ON 8' EASEMENT FLW FEARUAE e�+ry TM OF RETA IM MNLJ. 22 WVO£RGROIlNLI LLEG.. r1 � d' 'A5EAl6. I FYR POKER FAOLlT/ES 3r �UVER61R1 ND /* LOT 7dwE�rLLA 6� 7RACT D 1 1 A.P.N. 176-15-211 y T, VE VILLAS AT COPPERWYND Fa1egLAce 15' wioNc�rT I F1 BK 465, PG, J7, M C R. MpV 1 � 1 0 n) am� 1. f 5� sr0 g w s 54.73 p'e22 l j : i UriAERC"HLYJAO FOMfR 2 • / 1717' ^ + g R\ A! WAYWALL `,/+r' ,Or e2 O } l 1 1 A -1570o7- C I R=76500'.x, N yn �` 4 -204.75' TRACT D 9' La'IAMv ' ` GMAW LW FENCE 6N 'HE WiLAS AT COPPERWYND A-- 15'20 '08' lIW F4m:r TOP OF RETAMANO WALL &K 465 PG ,57, W.C.R � 1 R=800.00• REUAA(M) L-214.12' WALL'/. II 40 20 D 40 8D e' uNDERGR xD y X ` SCALE IN fEET 24 POYETF <ASEu£Nf' SCALE : t' - 40' 1' 4EIN R_HLW-A �1 , _ � •, r }� 'N x � M l��}�\f EASEMENT ! I 9rt 4' � \ WA WAY AND LANACAPE ZS FOUND NAIL ! FOUND WA5H ON \ 4T(Q STAMPED U5861 \�\ Jr CRAM REIENBON $' 6.i'D$'4D• £ 0.31' C 22 CE B�FA uFNr FQ4__ L" FENAREA UND£S' 1490LONT RGROUWD POAER (TIP) ORM FENCE RON FES eXOT I AIAf A 20 f A.P:rV.L115--211 ® a7d?. g6,;.'e ? s5.• %f L.AA0WAPFD \ # wTr. 3' LWAM LbWw - 25.2' AREA r, FE CEM TW s• N L CANVAS h3r R�2lK E°� � "4 REMINNG WALL w/ .3i cAktL°Y�, L=28.. ¢ f J' 19mOV60fr L .f Y. 52STC FLFwT ce �\ FENCE ON rw 8"ONAW # CANVASC"All NEHiI��IA31 �I�LWk Lih'tE wry 20 9' eAcuauc- urxJaJ 1 1 � + x J�C 3' SRA= WALL F ur 's'� \ >•, UH 5• LNAAV LAW 4=Zf 42'31 ` 1 ' HAN LR11r )PWW CW FOUCE GN Tov R=225.00' J t s. FACE I WALL 15 Dab' '...\ TAR mr CF REANG WALL ® L-85.25' '. VJ S CIF BWIVOARY LAVE W L .-L (TTP.) � 50 AM } -A { ` 2' L'.LtVCRETE sTTE£T /� [AAAREAFCD WALL I FOUND TAG IN PIN m \ e TRACT Kn i STAMPED 15881 cA.P.M.76-15»41b ® 1-1 N 84"28'58" E AUnvD 54' \ 4 8'? D F,V r -RIIND' AGYlp WALL wTN AT RIE / J EAS ENTENI '" -A 5 � i AT OG°PERMV7Mi' ` � ,i XI7IXh71T lRC7N t ASE Ila I --� FrrILE nM RF i 12 4-400' sf/ To ` w --�- R=15050.00' / J, SrLA= A SP H AL T PAVEMENT r wA FA ""33 5` WALL tis j IyGG .. _PPER;Np TRAcr r pR `5 p A.P N. 176-15-415 "3 j (PRIVATE ROADWAY £A R 9 C2 -TRACT PvENr sir P. FOfbVD LYTY OF SCOTTSOALE AN. 176-15-421 �� * — �1 — L18 BRASS CAP FLUSH 14- uNIAmcacumm EA 24 , L FOUND NAIL t, " Y COPPE RWYND RESORT & CLUB Existing Conditions Conceptual Planning Package 0' 20' 40' 80' 160' Copperwynd Resort 13225 N. Engle Krdge Dr. Ffl— H111h. A2 AP1618 02/16/2017 Allen IrgWs Partners EXHIBIT C-Pairog Stod C C PPERWYNDI RESORT EXPAN SIC N PIARIKING STUDY Addendum 41 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive Fountain Hills,Ariacna prepaied By: C ivllec hl CivTelch, Inc. 106051 Nc rlh He ydeln Road S L itel 140 Slaotllsdale, Arizcna 852 6C 11480; 6594-d 50 Areparec fon: Pe lisa des Resorts, LLC 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Dr Flcuntain Hills, AZ 85128E Fc r Submitia I tc : flown ci Rountein Hills AuglL sil 2017 CWTeich Aroject Nci. 17-(12'12 315819 n 1AWN D. 4AR_IIER NPIVA _ u 44PAOS 21,131120�1I CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .... ........................................... ......... ........................................ 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................ 3 EXISTING LAND USE............................................................................................ 3 EXISTING PARKING.. .............. ................................................................. .......... 3 PROPOSED HOTEL PROGRAMMING..........................................................................7 PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND LAND USE............................................................. 7 PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED....................................................................... 7 PROPOSED PARKING MODEL.................................................................................... 8 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS REQUIREMENTS PER ZONING ORDINANCE ...... 8 Fff .. niC [SII• :3 SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS............................................................................11 COMPARISON TO OTHER RESORTS........................................................................13 HOTEL PARKING PER ITE PARKING GENERATION ............................................... 14 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................. 15 LISTOF REFERENCES...............................................................................................17 TECHNICAL APPENDICES..........................................................................................18 +�iuTech August 2017 � CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Club Member Attendance.............................................................................. 3 Table 2: Existing Parking Counts............................................................................... 5 Table 3: Existing Parking Counts............................................................................... 5 Table 4: Existing Hourly Parking Demand — Thursday February 2, 2017 ................ 6 Table 5: Existing Hourly Parking Demand — Saturday February 4, 2017 ................. 6 Table 6: Proposed Hotel Programming...................................................................... 7 Table 7: Proposed Parking Provided.. ........................................................................ 7 Table 8: Town of Fountain Hills Base Requirements per Ordinance- Phase 3....... 8 Table 9: Reduction in Peak Parking Demand — Phase 1 (128 Rooms) ..................... 9 Table 10: Reduction in Peak Parking Demand — Phase 2 (188 Rooms).................10 Table 11: Reduction in Peak Parking Demand -= Phase 3 (300 Rooms).................11 Table 12: Shared Parking Analysis Results.............................................................12 Table 13: ITE Weekday Peak Period Parking Generation -Hotel .............................14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1. Vicinity Map...................................................................................................4 Ci VTech 'i August 2017 +�J CoppehWyndReaort-FounbainHK|n.Ahzunm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Parkinq Stu CivTeCh has been retained to prepare an Addendum h]the original approved Parking Study for the CopperVV«nd Resort expansion in Fountain Hills, Arizona. This parking study has been prepared to aA8iVZe the needs. of the Copp8rVVvnd Resort with the proposed redevelopment. Redevelopment is proposed in phases and will consist of k)tg| of 300 rooms and 11,7O0 square feet of banquet/meeting space at full bUitd-8u\ (Phase 3\.Arestaurant and fitness/tennis club are currently on-site and will remain with the redevelopment. �- Renovations hzthe COpperVV«Rd Resort are planned in phases. Phase one will include adding resort rooms to the northern part of the property resulting in a total of 172 r0oDlS. As part CfPhase 1, 7.890 square feet ofballroom and meeting space will be constructed. The restaurant space will remain the S@nle 3t2,583 square feet. Phase 2 will add 110 new r8oORS and remove 32 existing rooms for 8 total of 250 rooms. Full build-Vut/PhaS8 3 will add 50 rooms resulting in a total of 300 resort rooms. Phase 3 will also add 3.870 square feet ofmeeting space for 1oio| of 11.700 square feet. The parking demand for the eX|SdAg restaurant and fitness/tennis C;Vb is included in the existing parking counts, which are utilized in the shared parking model. Off-site patronage of the restaurant and club is not expected toincrease with the hotel expansion. Per the existing parking counts that were co|lected, the existing [8hO of gpomaS per nJOnn for hotel guest parking was 0.62 spaces per n3O0 (18 parking spaceg/29 nooDlS=0.02). Therefore, the parking demand for the guest P3Oroo can he estimated to be less than the Town Of Fountain Hills requirement of 1 space per room when calculating parking spaces for guests only. The employee and banqueUrneetinQ space is calculated separately in this 2DalVSiS per the Town's ratios. Off-site patronage of the restaurant and club 13 not expected to iDCn383e with the hotel expansion. AS 8 PeSult, the existing hourly perking CoUDiS for the mem bers/reStaUrant collected on a weekday and Saturday are utilized in the parking model. /- Per the Shared parking ana|ysio, the peak parking demand for Phase 1 is 211 spaces on a weekday and 233 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based or 100%occupancy and 8fuU event. 250 parking spaces are provided during Phase 1 (including 4OVnthe tennis COurta\. The provided parking spaces will be sufficient for typical hotel operations as well as fuli occupancy by providing a partial valet service. Per an extensive study that [|ivTSch completed for a valley resort. parking Can be increased by 15% when providing full valet service. Thereforo, when fU|| occupancy and a large event occur, a partial valet service should be implemented to handle any extra parking needs. During partial vo|a1 service, designated parking spaces for club members 8hOU|d be separated from the valet operations. y~_� ' � Aug�A2O17 CopperWynd Resort — f=ountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study Phase 2 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 2 is 264 spaces on a weekday and 276 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 420 parking spaces are provided during Phase 2 (not including 40 on the tennis courts). The provided parking spaces will be sufficient for typical hotel operations as well as a weekend with full occupancy and a large event. If partial or full valet service is provided, designated parking spaces for club members should be separated from the valet operations. Phase 3 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 3 is 323 spaces on a weekday and 345 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 345 parking spaces are provided for Phase 3 at full build -out. In addition, there is an option of 40 spaces on the tennis courts. The provided parking spaces at Phase 3 are sufficient to handle full operation of the resort. If partial or full valet service is provided, designated parking spaces for club members should be separated from the valet operations Comparison Table r A comparison table of parking provided at similar resorts is included in Appendix F. Per the table, of the eight comparison resorts in Arizona, the average parking supply ratio is 1.30 parking spaces per key. The proposed CopperWynd Resort will have a parking supply ratio of 1.45 spaces per key in Phase 1, 1.68 spaces per key (not including the tennis courts) in Phase 2, and 1.15 spaces per key (not including tennis courts) in Phase 3. It is important to note that the average meeting/banquet space of the comparison resorts is 34,400 square feet, whereas the CopperWynd Resort is proposed with only 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space. it can be concluded that the lower meeting/banquet space would result in a tower parking demand per room count. The resorts with reported parking problems have significantly more meeting/banquet space and a low ratio of parking per KSF of meeting space (14.1 and 5.7). The CopperWynd Resort will consist of parking per KSF of meeting/banquet space ratios of 31.7, 53.2, 29.4 in Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 respectively. Per the Fountain Hills Conference resort & Spa Parking Study, 25 parking spaces per KSF of meeting/banquet space is recommended. The CopperWynd Resort provides this ratio in Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3. Partial valet can be implemented if necessary during Phase 1 to accommodate large events that meed to utilize the tennis courts for additional parking. +CivTeCh August 2017 CopperWynd Resort - Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study INTRODUCTION CivTech has been retained to prepare a Parking Study for the CopperWynd Resort expansion in Fountains Hills, Arizona. A location map is provided in Figure 1. A parking study has been prepared to analyze the needs of the CopperWynd Resort with the proposed redevelopment. Redevelopment is proposed in phases and will consist of a total of 300 rooms and 11,760 square feet of banquet/meeting space at full build -out. A fitness and tennis club is currently on-site and will remain with the redevelopment. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING LAND USE The CopperWynd Resort is located at 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Road situated in the McDowell Mountains in 'Fountain Hills, Arizona. The existing resort and club comprises 32 resort rooms, a restaurant and a spa/fitness/tennis club. The club currently has approximately 300 members. Some of the members walk from the surrounding neighborhood. A site plan of the existing resort is included in Appendix B. EXISTING PARKING The existing site provides 193 parking spaces. An existing parking count was conducted by CivTech on Thursday February 2 and Saturday February 4. The parking count was separated into three areas (A, B & C). The upper lot, A, is mostly hotel parking. The middle iot, B, is where most of the club members and restaurant patrons park and the lower lot, C, is for employees. A member meeting was conducted at 9:00 AM on Thursday February 2, thus increasing the typical member parking demand during the morning. Member attendance on Thursday February 2 was provided by the resort and is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Club Member Attendance Thursday 212117 Drivers Walkers Total Morning (special members meeting) 33 11 44 Midday 11 6 17 Evening 6 0 6 CivTechs August 2017 1�1/ NG RTH Source.CivTech 2017 SITE Cap>?erwYrid I'll Qry �7 t Q� i Shea 'Blvd. Figure is Vicinity Map Z CiaTech rWynd Resort Fountain Hills, Arizona Park Table 2 summarizes the occupancy rates that was obtained from the hotel on the day of the parking counts Table 2: Existing Parking Counts Date Rooms Guests Occupancy 2/1117 29 51 83% 2/2/17 29 54 83% 2/3/17 20 38 57% 2/4/17 17 29 49% Per the data, the average room occupancy is 1.8 persons per room. The parking counts are included in Appendix C and summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Existing Parking Counts As indicated in Table 3, the maximum parking demand for the combination of resort, restaurant, and club on a weekday was 76 spaces at 2:00 PM. On Saturday, the maximum parking demand for the combination of resort, restaurant, and club was 82 spaces at 7:00 PM. Based on parking in the middle lot, B, the approximate peak parking demand for restaurant/club members on a weekday was 44 spaces and occurred at 9:00 AM during a member meeting. On Saturday, the approximate peak parking demand for restaurant/club members was 52 spaces at 10:00 AM per the count in the middle lot, B. Per the hotel, most members and restaurant patrons park in Lot B. Lot A had a larger parking demand on a Saturday evening most likely due to restaurant patrons. In order to account for this existing restaurant parking, the total of Lot A & Lot B was utilized minus the estimated hotel parking. The hotel parking on Saturday was estimated to be 14 parking spaces per the 6:00 AM count in Lot A. The resulting Club/Restaurant hourly parking demand utilized in the study are summarized in Table 4 for a weekday and in Table 5 on a Saturday. CivTech 5 August 2{]17 Thursday Saturday Scenario February 2, 2017 February 4, 2017 18 spaces 28 spaces Upper Parking Lot A(Mostly Hotel) at 2:00 PM at 7:00 PM 31 spaces 43 spaces ---- Middle Parkin2 Lot B Club/Restaurant at 2:00 PM at 7:00 PM 27 spaces_ - 11 spaces - T^at Lower Parking Lot C (Employee) at 2:00 PM 7:00 PM Total Resort & Club 76 spaces 82 spaces Peak Parking Demand at 2:00 PM at 7:00 PM As indicated in Table 3, the maximum parking demand for the combination of resort, restaurant, and club on a weekday was 76 spaces at 2:00 PM. On Saturday, the maximum parking demand for the combination of resort, restaurant, and club was 82 spaces at 7:00 PM. Based on parking in the middle lot, B, the approximate peak parking demand for restaurant/club members on a weekday was 44 spaces and occurred at 9:00 AM during a member meeting. On Saturday, the approximate peak parking demand for restaurant/club members was 52 spaces at 10:00 AM per the count in the middle lot, B. Per the hotel, most members and restaurant patrons park in Lot B. Lot A had a larger parking demand on a Saturday evening most likely due to restaurant patrons. In order to account for this existing restaurant parking, the total of Lot A & Lot B was utilized minus the estimated hotel parking. The hotel parking on Saturday was estimated to be 14 parking spaces per the 6:00 AM count in Lot A. The resulting Club/Restaurant hourly parking demand utilized in the study are summarized in Table 4 for a weekday and in Table 5 on a Saturday. CivTech 5 August 2{]17 CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study Table 4: Existing Hourly Parking Demand — Thursday February 2, 2017 Beginning Hour Hotel Guest Member/Restaurant Ennla ee Total 6:00 AM 18 8 1 27 7:00 AM 16 20 2 38 8:00 AM 15 33 10 58 9:00 AM 13 44 15 72 10:00 AM 9 36 23 68 11:00 AM 11 35 26 72 12:00 PM 11 35 26 72 1:00 PM 11 24 23 58 2:00 PM 18 31 27 76 3:00 PM 14 25 28 67 4:00 PM 10 27 24 61 5:04 PM 9 25 21 55 6:00 PM 10 34 16 60 7:00 PM 15 36 10 61 8:00 PM 18 17 8 43 9:00 PM 14 14 6 34 Table 5: Existing Hourly Parking Demand — Saturday February 4, 2017 Beginning Hour Hotel Guest Member/Restaurant Em to ee Total 6:00 AM 14 2 1 17 7:00 AM 14 8 4 26 8:00 AM 10 17 6 33 9:00 AM 8 49 11 68 10:00 AM 10 52 13 75 11:04 AM 8 40 18 66 12:00 PM 11 20 17 48 1:00 PM 9 25 18 52 2:00 PM 11 28 21 60 3:00 PM 6 28 23 57 4:00 PM 7 26 16 49 5:00 PM 10 19 18 47 6:00 PM 14 49 15 78 7:00 PM 14 57 11 82 8:00 PM 14 43 12 1 69 9:00 PM 14 41 6 1 61 CivTech 6 August 2017 CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study PROPOSED HOTEL PROGRAMMING PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND LAND USE Renovations to the CopperWynd Resort are planned in phases. Phase one will include adding resort rooms to the northern part of the property resulting in a total of 172 rooms. As part of Phase 1, 7,890 square feet of ballroom and meeting space will be constructed. The restaurant space will remain the same at 2,563 square feet. Phase 2 will add 110 rooms and remove the 32 existing rooms for a total of 250 rooms. Full build-out/Phase 3 will result in a total of 300 resort rooms and 11,760 square feet of meeting space. The parking demand for the existing restaurant and club is included in the existing parking counts, which will be utilized in the shared parking model. Off-site patronage of the restaurant and club is not expected to 'increase with the hotel expansion. Table 6 summarizes the proposed hotel programming. Table 6: Proposed Hotel Programming PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED The current plan is to complete the expansion in three phases. A parking garage is proposed with Full Build -out. Table 7 summarizes the proposed parking per each phase. Table 7: Proposed Parking Provided Scenario Spaces Phase 3 Land Use Phase 1 Phase 2 (Full Build -out) Total Resort Rooms 172 rooms 250 rooms 300 rooms Meetlng/Ban quet Space 7,890 SF 7,890 SF 11,760 SF Restaurant 210 40 0 (accounted for in existing parking counts) 2,563 SF 2,563 SF 2,563 SF 40 Remains as Remains as Remains as Spa, Fitness & Tennis Club existing with -300 existing with -300 existing with -300 (-300 members) members- members members PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED The current plan is to complete the expansion in three phases. A parking garage is proposed with Full Build -out. Table 7 summarizes the proposed parking per each phase. Table 7: Proposed Parking Provided CivTech August 2017 Zf Number of Provided Parking Spaces Optional Valet on Scenario Surface Tennis Courts Garage Total 210 plus 40 on tennis Phase 1 210 40 0 courts for large event 420 plus 40 on tennis Phase 2 181 40 239 courts if needed, 346 plus 40 on tennis Phase 3 118 40 228 courts if needed CivTech August 2017 Zf CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking study PROPOSED PARKING MODEL TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS REQUIREMENTS PER ZONING ORDINANCE Base parking requirements were calculated per the Town of Fountain Hill's Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 7) for the proposed hotel programming and are summarized in Table 8. Per the base requirements, the proposed expansion at full build -out requires 579 parking spaces. The requirements are included in Appendix D. Table 8: Town of Fountain Hills Base Requirements per Ordinance- Phase 3 Land Use Size Required Ratio Required 5 aces Guest Rooms_ 300 rooms 1 space per 1 room 300.00 Employees 99 emp0) 1 space per 2 emp 49.5 Private golf clubs, swimming, and tennis clubs 3010 members - 1 space per 5 members 60,00 Restaurant 2,553 SF 1 s ace er 50 SF 51.26 Conference/Meetina 11,760 SF 1 space per 4 persons 117.60 Total 579.00 1. 0.33 empiroom was assumed as recommended in ULt shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 2. Per LILT Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,000 SF. The 'Shared Parking' in Chapter 18 of the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance is designed for the Town Center Commercial Zoning district, and not relevant for the different uses of a hotel/resort. For instance, percentages for member club & meeting rooms/ballrooms are not included in the Town's shared parking model. For this analysis, the ULI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition and ITE Parking Generation were utilized for hourly percentages in a Shared Parking Model for the resort, which is discussed in a later section. PARKING REDUCTIONS Per the existing parking counts that were collected, the existing ratio of spaces per room for hotel guest parking was 0.62 spaces per room (18 parking spaces/29 rooms=0.52). Therefore, the parking demand for the guest rooms can be estimated to be less than the Town of Fountain Hills requirement of 1 space per room when calculating parking spaces for guests only. The employee and banquet/meeting space is calculated separately in this analysis per the Town's ratios. As discussed earlier, offs -site patronage of the restaurant and club is not expected to increase with the hotel expansion. As a result, the existing hourly parking counts for the club membersirestaurant collected on a weekday and Saturday are utilized in the parking model. �'` CivTech 8 August 2017 Co,pperWynd Resort—Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study The mode split is the percentage of persons arriving at a destination in different modes of transportation. A portion of hotel and event guests and employees will arrive by taxi, shuttle, or ride share companies and need to be accounted for in the parking model. With the resort expansion, a hotel airport shuttle and a shuttle to surrounding attractions will be advertised and provided to the hotel guests. The reductions are summarized in Table 9, Table 10, and Table 11 for Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 respectively. Table 9: Reduction in Peak Parking Demand - Phase 1 (172 Rooms) 1. Per existing data, the hotel currently has 1.8 persons per room. 2. 0.33 emp/room was assumed as recommended in ULI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 3. Per ULI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,000 5F. 4. Utilization accounts for hotel occupancy, which is assumed as 1010% for this parking model. 5. % Using personal vehicles accounts for Modal Split (The percentage is those guests arriving by personallrental vehicles. The other guests arrive via other transportation such as taxi, ride sharing companies, or shuttle.) 6. Vehicle occupancy rate accounts for carpooling (including guests in separate rooms sharing a personal/rented vehicle) The resulting ratio for guest parking is 0.625 (107.55 spaces/172 roams -0.625), which corresponds to the existing data for the hotel, The other hotel uses, including employees, are calculated separately. Ci�vTe[h August 2017 % Using Personal/Rental Vehicle Base % Utilization/ Vehicles Occupancy Peak Parking Use Demand Occupancy (4) Modal S Pit W Rates6I Demand 172 Guest 309.6 Rooms guestsM 100% 66% 1.9 107.55 Town of Fountain Hills Ratios Employees 56.76 em(l) 1 space per 2 em la ees 28.33 Ballrooms & Meeting 315.60 Space attendees(') 1 space per 4 persons 78.90 Existing Parking taunts Restaurant Weekday: 44 & Club7 Existin Data Weekend: 57 Weekday: 259 TOTAL Weekend: 272 1. Per existing data, the hotel currently has 1.8 persons per room. 2. 0.33 emp/room was assumed as recommended in ULI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 3. Per ULI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,000 5F. 4. Utilization accounts for hotel occupancy, which is assumed as 1010% for this parking model. 5. % Using personal vehicles accounts for Modal Split (The percentage is those guests arriving by personallrental vehicles. The other guests arrive via other transportation such as taxi, ride sharing companies, or shuttle.) 6. Vehicle occupancy rate accounts for carpooling (including guests in separate rooms sharing a personal/rented vehicle) The resulting ratio for guest parking is 0.625 (107.55 spaces/172 roams -0.625), which corresponds to the existing data for the hotel, The other hotel uses, including employees, are calculated separately. Ci�vTe[h August 2017 CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study Table 10: Reduction in Peak Parking Demand — Prase 2 (250 Rooms) 1. Per existing data, the hotel currently has 1.8 persons per room. 2. 4.33 emplroorn was assumed as recommended in U0 Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 3. Per LILI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,000 SF. 4. Utilization accounts for hotel occupancy, which is assumed as 100% for this parking model. 5. % Using personal vehicles accounts for Modal Split (The percentage is those guests arriving by persona;/rental vehicles. The other guests arrive via other transportation such as taxi, ride sharing companies, or shuttle.) 6. Vehicle occupancy rate accounts for carpooling (including guests in separate rooms sharing a personatirented vehicle) The resulting ratio for guest parking is 0.625 (156.32 spaces/250 rooms=0.625), which corresponds to the existing data for the hotel. The other hotel uses, including employees, are calculated separately. CivTech 10 August 2017 % Using Personal/Rental Vehicle Base % Utilizationl Vehicles Occupancy Peak Parking Use Demand Occupancy(4) iModal 5 lit (5) Rate(N Demand 250 Guest 450.0 Rooms uests(') 100% 06% 1.9 156.32 Town of Fountain Hills Ratios Employees 82.50 em !2' 1 space per 2 employees 41.25 Ballrooms & Meeting 315.60 Space attendeesN 1 space per 4 eersons 78.90 Existing Parking Counts Restaurant Weekday: 44 & Club t=xisting data Weekend: 57 Weekday: 321 TOTAL Weekend: 334 1. Per existing data, the hotel currently has 1.8 persons per room. 2. 4.33 emplroorn was assumed as recommended in U0 Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 3. Per LILI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,000 SF. 4. Utilization accounts for hotel occupancy, which is assumed as 100% for this parking model. 5. % Using personal vehicles accounts for Modal Split (The percentage is those guests arriving by persona;/rental vehicles. The other guests arrive via other transportation such as taxi, ride sharing companies, or shuttle.) 6. Vehicle occupancy rate accounts for carpooling (including guests in separate rooms sharing a personatirented vehicle) The resulting ratio for guest parking is 0.625 (156.32 spaces/250 rooms=0.625), which corresponds to the existing data for the hotel. The other hotel uses, including employees, are calculated separately. CivTech 10 August 2017 CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study Table 11: Reduction in Peak Parking Demand — Phase 3 (300 Rooms) 1. Per existing data, the hotel currently has 1.8 persons per room. 2, 0.33 emplroom was assumed as recommended in UL! Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 3. Per UL1 Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,900 SF. 4. Utilization accounts for hotel occupancy, which is assumed as 100% for this parking model. 5. % Using personal vehicles accounts for Modal Split (The percentage is those guests arriving by personalirental vehicles. The other guests arrive via other transportation such as taxi, ride sharing companies, or shuttle.) 6. Vehicle occupancy rate accounts for carpooling (including guests in separate morns sharing a personal/rented vehicle) The resulting ratio for guest parking is 0.625 (187.58 spaces/300 roams=0.825), which corresponds to the existing data for the hotel. The other hotel uses, including employees, are calculated separately. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS Shared parking is defined as a parking space that can be used for two or more individual land uses without conflict, For instance, the individual land uses will have peaks at different times of the day and therefore can share parking spaces. To determine the total number of shared parking spaces required between different land uses, a shared parking model may be developed. Hourly percentages for each individual land use are utilized to estimate the overall peak parking demand accumulated for each hour of the day. The existing club member and restaurant hourly parking demand is also included in the shared parking analysis. The 'Shared Parking' in Chapter 18 of the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance is designed for the Town Center Commercial Zoning district, and not relevant for the different uses of a hotel/resort. For instance, percentages for member club & meeting rooms/ballrooms are not included in the Town's shared parking model. f,/ CivTech 11 August 2017 % Using PersonalfRental Vehicle Base % Utilization/ Vehicles Occupancy Peak Parking Use Demand Occupancy (4) Modal S lit 0) Rates) Demand 300 Guest 540 Roomsguests(i) 100% 66% 1.9 187.58 Town of Fountain Hills Ratios Employees 99 emp�,? 1 space per 2 employees 49.5 Ballrooms & Meeting 470.40 Space attendees�3) 1 space per 4 persons 117.60 Existing Parking Counts Restaurant Weekday' 44 & club _Existin2 Data weekend: 57 - Weekday; 399 TOTAL. Weekend: 412 1. Per existing data, the hotel currently has 1.8 persons per room. 2, 0.33 emplroom was assumed as recommended in UL! Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. 3. Per UL1 Shared Parking, 2nd Edition. a 90th percentile event has a density of 40 persons per 1,900 SF. 4. Utilization accounts for hotel occupancy, which is assumed as 100% for this parking model. 5. % Using personal vehicles accounts for Modal Split (The percentage is those guests arriving by personalirental vehicles. The other guests arrive via other transportation such as taxi, ride sharing companies, or shuttle.) 6. Vehicle occupancy rate accounts for carpooling (including guests in separate morns sharing a personal/rented vehicle) The resulting ratio for guest parking is 0.625 (187.58 spaces/300 roams=0.825), which corresponds to the existing data for the hotel. The other hotel uses, including employees, are calculated separately. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS Shared parking is defined as a parking space that can be used for two or more individual land uses without conflict, For instance, the individual land uses will have peaks at different times of the day and therefore can share parking spaces. To determine the total number of shared parking spaces required between different land uses, a shared parking model may be developed. Hourly percentages for each individual land use are utilized to estimate the overall peak parking demand accumulated for each hour of the day. The existing club member and restaurant hourly parking demand is also included in the shared parking analysis. The 'Shared Parking' in Chapter 18 of the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance is designed for the Town Center Commercial Zoning district, and not relevant for the different uses of a hotel/resort. For instance, percentages for member club & meeting rooms/ballrooms are not included in the Town's shared parking model. f,/ CivTech 11 August 2017 CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study For this analysis, the OLI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition and ITE Parking Generation was utilized for hourly percentages. ULI Shared Parking, 2nd Edition has specific methodology for Hotels, and specific hourly percentages for separate hotel uses are provided in Table 2-5 & 2-6. The shared parking model worksheets are included in Appendix E. Table 12 summarizes the results of the shared parking analysis for each phase. Table 12: Shared Parking Analysis Results Scenario Peak Parking Demand per Shared Parking Analysis Weekday Weekend Without Full Valet Without Full Valet Phase 1 Hotel & Meeting/Banquet 177 at 6 PM 176 at 7 PM Existin Restaurant & Club 34 at 6 PM 57 at 7 PM Phase 1 Total 211 at 6 PM 233 at 7 PM Phase 2 Hotel & Meeting/Banquet 229 at 9 AM 219 at 7 PM Existing Restaurant & Club 44 at,9 AM's 57 at 7 PM Phase 2 Total 264 at 9 AM 276 at 7 PM Phase 3/Full Build -out Hotel & Meeting/Banquet 279 at 9 AM 304 at 9 PM Existinu Restaurant & Club 44 at 9 AU 1) 41 at 9 PM Phase 3 Total 323 at 9 AM 345 at 9 PM 1. A special member meeting occurred on the day of the count increasing the typical morning demand of the member parking. Phase 1 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 1 is 211 spaces on a weekday and 233 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 250 parking spaces are provided during Phase 1 (including 40 on the tennis courts). The provided parking spaces will be sufficient for typical hotel operations. Per an extensive study that CivTech completed for a valley resort, parking can be increased by 15% when providing full valet service. Therefore, when full occupancy 12 August 2017 Ci1/Tech CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study and a large event occur, partial valet service must be implemented to handle the extra parking. During partial valet service, designated parking spaces for club members should be separated from the valet operations. Phase 2 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 2 is 264 spaces on a weekday and 276 spaces on a Saturday, This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 420 parking spaces are provided during Phase 2 (not including 40 on the tennis courts). The provided parking spaces at Phase 3 are sufficient to handle full operation of the resort. Phase 3 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 3 is 323 spaces on a weekday and 345 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 346 parking spaces are provided for Phase 3 at full build- out. In addition, there is also the option of 40 spaces on the tennis courts. The provided parking spaces at Phase 3 are sufficient to handle full operation of the resort, COMPARISON TO OTHER RESORTS A comparison table of parking provided at similar resorts is included in Appendix F. The table is comprised of information that CivTech previously obtained along with comparable resorts from the Fountain Hills Conference Resort & Spa Parking Study prepared for Fountain Hills by the CK Group, Inc, Per the table, of the eight comparison, resorts in Arizona, the average parking supply ratio is 1.30 parking spaces per key. The proposed CopperWynd Resort will have a parking supply ratio of 1.45 spaces per key in Phase 1, 1,68 spaces per key (not including tennis courts) in Phase 2, and 1.15 spaces per key (not including tennis courts) in Phase 3, It is important to note that the average meeting/banquet space of the comparison resorts is 34,400 square feet, whereas the CopperWynd Resort is proposed with only 11,760 square feet of meeting/banquet space. It can be concluded that the lower meeting/banquet space would result in a lower parking demand per room count. The resorts with reported parking problems have significantly more meeting/banquet space and a low ratio of parking per KSF of meeting space (14.1 and 5.7). The CopperWynd Resort will consist of parking per KSF of meeting/banquet space ratios of 31.7, 53.2, 29.4 in Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 respectively. Per the Fountain Hills Conference Resort & Spa Parking Study, 25 parking spaces per KSF of meeting/banquet space is recommended. The CopperWynd Resort exceeds this ratio in Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3. Partial valet can be implemented if necessary during Phase 1 to accommodate large events. CivTech 13 August 2017 CoppeMynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking study HOTEL PARKING PER ITE PARKING GENERATION The parking demand for the hotel was also estimated utilizing ITE Parking Generation, 41 Edition. Parking Generation contains data collected by various transportation professionals for a wide ranee of different land uses. The data summarized in the report include average rates and equations that have been established correlating the relationship between an independent variable that describes the development size and parking demand for each categorized land use. According to ITE Parking Generation, the description for Land Use Code 310, Hotel, is "hotels are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as restaurants; cocktail lounges; meeting and banquet rooms or- convention rconvention facilities; limited recreational facilities (pool, fitness center); and/or other retail and service shops," ITE Parking Generation also contains a land use category for a resort, however, the number of data points is small. Table 13 summarizes the ITE rate for a Hotel (land use code 310). The trip generation worksheet is included in Appendix G. Table 13: ITE Weekday Peak Period Parking Generation -Hotel Utilizing ITE Parking Generation, the 851h percentile weekday peak parking demand for Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 is 180 spaces, 270 spaces, and 324 spaces respectively. The proposed CopperWynd Resort is providing more spaces than estimated by the `Hotel' land use in ITE Parking Generation. This is expected since member parking must also be considered. CivTech14 August201T Weekday Peak Period Parking Demand 85" Percentile (1.08 vehicles per Land Use Size occupied room) Provided Parkin Hotel Phase 1 Land Use Code 310 172 Occupied Rooms 186 parking spaces 250 parking spaces Hotel Phase 2 Land Use Cade 310 2.5_0.0_ cou ied Rooms 270 parking spaces 420 parkings aces Hotel Phase 3 (Land Use Code 310) 300 Occupied Rooms 324 parking spaces 346 parking spaces Utilizing ITE Parking Generation, the 851h percentile weekday peak parking demand for Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 is 180 spaces, 270 spaces, and 324 spaces respectively. The proposed CopperWynd Resort is providing more spaces than estimated by the `Hotel' land use in ITE Parking Generation. This is expected since member parking must also be considered. CivTech14 August201T CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented in this study: Renovations to the CopperWynd Resort are planned in phases. Phase one will include adding resort rooms to the northern part of the property resulting in a total of 172 rooms. As part of Phase 1, 7,890 square feet of ballroom and meeting space will be constructed. The restaurant space will remain the same at 2,563 square feet. Phase 2 will add 110 new rooms and remove 32 existing rooms for a total of 250 moms. Full build-out/Phase 3 will add 50 rooms resulting in a total of 300 resort rooms. Phase 3 will also add 3,870 square feet of meeting space for a total of 11,760 square feet. The parking demand for the existing restaurant and fitness/tennis club is included in the existing parking counts, which are utilized in the shared parking model. Off-site patronage of the restaurant and club is not expected to increase with the hotel expansion. Per the existing parking counts that were collected, the existing ratio of spaces per room for hotel guest parking was 0.62 spaces per room (18 parking spaces/29 rooms=0.62). Therefore, the parking demand for the guest rooms can be estimated to be less than the Town of Fountain Hills requirement of 1 space per room when calculating parking spaces for guests only. The employee and banquet/meeting space is calculated separately in this analysis per the Town's ratios, Off-site patronage of the restaurant and club is not expected to increase with the hotel expansion. As a result, the existing hourly parking counts for the members/restaurant collected on a weekday and Saturday are utilized in the parking model. Phase 1 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 1 is 211 spaces on a weekday and 233 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 250 parking spaces are provided during Phase 1 (including 40 on the tennis courts), The provided parking spaces will be sufficient for typical hotel operations as well as full occupancy by providing a partial valet service. Per an extensive study that CivTech completed for a valley resort, parking can he increased by 15% when providing full valet service. Therefore, when full occupancy and a large event occur, a partial valet service should be implemented to handle any extra parking needs. During partial valet service, designated parking spaces for club members should be separated from the valet operations. CivTech 15 Augusto, CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills. Arizona Parking Study Phase 2 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 2 is 264 spaces on a weekday and 276 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 1009% occupancy and a full event, 420 parking spaces are provided during Phase 2 (not including 40 on the tennis courts). The provided parking spaces will be sufficient for typical hotel operations as well as a weekend with full occupancy and a large event. If partial or full valet service is provided, designated parking spaces for club members should be separated from the valet operations. Phase 3 Per the shared parking analysis, the peak parking demand for Phase 3 is 323 spaces on a weekday and 345 spaces on a Saturday. This parking demand is based on 100% occupancy and a full event. 345 parking spaces are provided for Phase 3 at full build -out. In addition, there is an option of 40 spaces on the tennis courts. The provided parking spaces at Phase 3 are sufficient to handle full operation of the resort. If partial or full valet service is provided, designated parking spaces for club members should be separated from the valet operations Comparison Table A comparison table of parking provided at similar resorts is included in Appendix F. Per the table, of the eight comparison resorts in Arizona, the average parking supply ratio is 1.30 parking spaces per key. The proposed CopperWynd Resort will have a parking supply ratio of 1.45 spaces per key in Phase 1, 1.68 spaces per key (not including the tennis courts) in Phase 2, and 1.15 spaces per key (not including tennis courts) in Phase 3. It is important to note that the average meeting/banquet space of the comparison resorts is 34,400 square feet, whereas the CopperWynd Resort is proposed with only 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space. It can be concluded that the lower meeting/banquet space would result in a lower parking demand per room count. The resorts with reported parking problems have significantly more meeting/banquet space and a low ratio of parking per KSF of meeting space (14.1 and 5.7). The CopperWynd Resort will consist of parking per KSF of meeting/banquet space ratios of 31.7, 53.2, 29.4 in Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 respectively. Per the Fountain Hills Conference Resort & Spa Parking Study, 25 parking spaces per KSF of meeting/banquet space is recommended. The CopperWynd Resort provides this ratio in Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3. Partial valet can be implemented if necessary during Phase I to accommodate large events that need to utilize the tennis courts for additional parking. CivTech 16 August2017 �O CopperWynd Resort -- Fountain Hills, Arizona Parking Study LIST OF REFERENCES Parking Generation, 41 Edition, institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2010. Smith, Mary S. Shared Parking, Second Edition, Washington, D.G.: ULI-the Urban Land Institute and the International Council of Shopping Centers, 2005. Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 CivZeCh 17 August 2017 CopperWynd Resort — Fountain Hills, Arizona APPENDIX A: APPENDIX B: APPENDIX C: APPENDIX. D: APPENDIX E: APPENDIX F: APPENDIX G: TECHNICAL APPENDICES Parting Study REVIEW COMMENTS (RESERVED) SITE PLAN EXISTING PARKING COUNTS TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE CHAPTER 7 SHARED PARKING MODEL COMPARISON TABLE OF SIMILAR RESORTS HOTEL PARKING PER ITE PARKING GENERATION �/��.s CivTech 18 August 2017 APPENDIX A REVIEW COMMENTS (RESERVED) CivTech APPENDIX E SITE PLAN G:� C1vTech •�F �. : r r 0.a 4, .'+� R om Vying F7prCh ?.• ...''.''�9A4keys r ,a 4 ^r . Fun• .car.+ \\ • :.,4 � i sCiilie OatleYiea.+/ Existing Q �" Valet. CIubhouso •g'y�' ' ; '. T. R -61n r Akey 1 , tuiember3hEp FEL FaCII ItIE+ 7,B4Osf of banquet spa[':�e - -•F ,� Istiny vlll�sr, �1 -41 I' Existing �ssl, Amended - Paarking t0 \ . - r• 1 ,' ,'t 6arzquet -moi L.a ��• Courtya ^Resort Facility \ R oms > r s0 iteys� ' -.n @anglfBt pace �" R iaxw 4444 a .r ,•� r ; A,.t9k4P' � Overall Development. Project Data Program t, CC?P 300 keys (previous 265 + 34 new elite keys) • -[4� 11.750 sf meeting Space _ f H71IIULTC ' existing spa & restaurant to remain withy - {. -L- rte---' �ti —e1g ! ' expanded pool bar ,., w # , y{ L>r'' - - 9 Copperwynd Resorl Overall Site Plan;;°'m• Updated Conceptual Planning Package AIIen WPE lncrs CQ P R E R 1IIf Y N Q kESOV S CLUB Phase M t. i'orth Motel Wing of xa \\ iy q.�.t _ 4� Phase 1 N z,. r` N -+y H0t'el Wing, Expan-1�edi. -_ + IG ember Facifltias, Ban quot / ` t Space -6 Pool PDOI Area RBnora.4iOn ,/ 140 keys Q (' t 9 yI 4` tY A � f �4�. r �• r xetw�' L4 'i� �� •1 i 7Si5ting MiII s"T. f Jf" Copperwynd 8eoai Overall Site Plan I Phasing Diagram _°' CC3, P E, D Updated conceptual Planning Package RESORt S CLU& or rd' 'a 6` 10 Phase 1 : Project Data Program 17�) keys (3;). existing 1 140 new) 7.890 si meet Ing space existing spa & restaurant to remain COPPER'WYND RESORT 3 CLUE Copperwynd Resor) Phase One Site Pfau _. .N C`.nnran}a rel PI�nn4nn Pant<ano ANP.n,�jy+��.•Inc s ••PP.. r,54 , ij- � e.�e;ss ler r xmexm . Existing Clubhouse n—7o Remain Phase 1 : Project Data Program 17�) keys (3;). existing 1 140 new) 7.890 si meet Ing space existing spa & restaurant to remain COPPER'WYND RESORT 3 CLUE Copperwynd Resor) Phase One Site Pfau _. .N C`.nnran}a rel PI�nn4nn Pant<ano ANP.n,�jy+��.•Inc s 419 b L ----- e5mloej bujuLiu[d jenjdeouoo Paiepdn (3NAMb3ddO:) Uleld qj!S om aseqd posea puAmioddoo jvq az)ln! Pl� -tual m;ulainsisaj ads 6ul7sixe Mau L4;lm Up a3ECI5 6ulla6w is OGIV4 snorAajd I BUIISIXa Fo aACLUSH) &-gcidoo Mau O�L I Olt, - IJLJ LUE-JBO-ld e 9Sl2LIA V. W J Li T -Ari - 6,6i rahlp Fe. 90st of b ti E3 no 3 Da ky E C \e Par.kng T -Ari - 6,6i E3 no Da ky Phase 3 Project Data Program 300 keys (previous 250 + 50 new elite keys) 11,760 at meeting space existing spa & restaurant to remain with expanded pool bar Courtyapr.dlResorl\ Roorno Isor Copperwynd ReaQd Overall Site Pian I Phases 1, 2 & 3 COPPERWYND Updated Conceptual Planning Package RESORT & clue w w r. i Elevation Study I West Elevation I Arrival Side Elevation Study I East Elevation I Pool n 0 ti L.. A 3 v APPENDIX C EXISTING PARKING COUNTS 6=� Civ+T'ech Parking Lot Counts A I B 1 C77 Normal I ADA I Total I Normal I ADA I Total I Normal I ADA Total Project #4 17-210 CopperWynd Resort February 2, 2017 Time 30 4 1 34 J 123 1 2 125 33 1 34 GRAND TOTAL 6:00 AM 17 1 18 8 8 1 1 27 6:30 AM 16 1 17 13 13 1 1 31 7:00 AM 14 2 16 20 20 2 2 38 7:30 AM 14 1 15 15 15 3 3 33 8:00 AM 14 1 15 33 33 10 10 58 8:30 AM 11 3 14 41 41 12 12 67 9:00 AM 10 3 .13 44 44 15 15 72 9:30 AM 12 3 15 38 1 39 20 20 74 10:00 AM 6 3 9 35 1 36 23 23 68 10:30 AM 7 2 9 31 2 33 24 24 66 11.00 AM 9 2 11 35 35 26 26 72 11:30 AM 7 2 9 37 37 26 26 72 12:00 PM 9 2 11 35 35 26 26 72 12:30 PM 8 1 9 29 29 26 26 64 1:00 PM 10 13 1 1 11 24 2 24 23 23 26 58 1:30 PM 14 25 27 26 67 2:00 PM 17 1 18 29 2 31 27 27 76 2:30 PM 13 2 15 28 2 30 29 29 74 3:00 PM 12 2 14 24 1 25 28 28 67 3:30 PM 10 10 23 1 24 21 21 55 4:00 PM 10 10 27 27 24 24 61 4:30 PM 10 10 31 31 23 23 64 5:00 PM 9 9 24 1 25 21 21 55 5:30 PM 9 9 30 30 21 21 60 6:(DO PM 9 1 10 34 34 16 16 60 6:30 PM 13 1 14 38 38 10 10 62 7:00 PM 14 1 15 36 36 10 10 61 7:30 PM 14 1 15 28 28 9 9 52 8:00 PM 17 1 18 17 17 8 1 8 43 8:30 PM 17 14 17 15 15 7 7 1 39 9:00 PM 14 14 14 6 6 34 Parking Lot Counts A I B I C Normal I ADA I Tota! I Norma! I ADA I Total I Normal ADA I Total Project # 17-210 CopperWynd Resort February 4, 2017 Time 1 30 4 34 123 2 125 33 1 34 GRAND TOTAL 6:00 AM 14 14 2 2 1 1 17 6:30 AM 14 14 3 3 1 1 18 7:00 AM 13 1 14 8 8 4 4 26 7:30 AM 13 1 14 12 12 6 6 32 8:00 AM 10 10 17 17 6 6 33 8:30 AM 9 9 41 41 7 7 57 9:00 AM 8 8 48 1 49 11 11 68 9:30 AM 10 10 50 1 51 12 12 73 10:00 AM 14 10 50 2 52 13 13 75 10:30 AM 11 11 44 1 45 16 16 72 11:00 AM 8 8 40 40 18 18 66 11:30 AM 6 6 35 1 36 16 16 58 12:00 PM 11 11 19 1 20 17 17 48 12:30 PM 8 1 9 24 1 25 17 17 51 1:00 PM 8 1 9 23 30 2 25 18 18 52 1:30 PM 8 2 10 2 32 19 19 61 2:00 PM 9 2 11 26 2 28 21 21 60 2:30 PM 10 10 28 1 29 22 22 61 3:00 PM 6 6 28 28 23 23 57 3:30 PM 6 6 17 17 21 21 44 4:00 PM 7 7 26 26 16 16 49 4:30 PM 9 9 21 21 18 18 48 5:00 PM 10 10 19 19 18 18 47 5:30 PM 9 9 19 19 17 17 45 6:00 PM 17 4 21 1 42 42 15 15 78 6:30 PM 21 4 25 35 1 36 11 11 72 7:00 PM 24 4 28 42 1 43 11 11 82 7:30 PM 25 4 29 36 1 37 12 12 78 8:00 PM 23 4 27 29 1 30 12 12 69 8:30 PM 22 4 26 32 1 33 8 8 67 9:00 PM 1 20 4 24 30 1 1 31 6 6 61 APPENDIX D TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE [y:1,1 i d :11:i1 CivTech Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS Sections: 7.01 Purpose. 7.02 General Regulations. 7.03 Design and Location of Parking Spaces. 7.04 Schedule of Required Off -Street Spaces. Page 1 of 21 July 2006 Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 11. One parking space for persons with disabilities shall be required for any development having 25 or more parking spaces, Thereafter, not less than two percent (2%) of the parking spaces within a development shall be built and maintained as parking spaces for persons with disabilities, C. The Use of Tandem Parking Spaces: To meet the off-street parking requirements of this Chapter is not permitted in any zoning district. Section 7.04 Schedule of Required Off -Street Spaces A. Off' -Street Parking Spaces: Shall be provided for each specified use in accordance with the schedule below. B. Definitions. In calculating the total number of required parking spaces, "usable area" as used herein shall mean the area capable of being devoted to the specified use (does not include such spaces as kitchens, rostrums, hallways, etc), and the term "seat" shall also include each thirty (30) inches of bench seating when individual seats are not provided. C. Mixed Use Developments: In the event of mixed-use developments, the total requirement for off-street parking spaces is the sum of the requirements of the various uses computed separately. D. Fractional Amount: In calculating the total number of required off-street parking spaces, fractional amounts shall be rounded upward to the next whole parking space. E. Unlisted Uses: Minimum parking requirements for a specific use not listed in this Section shall be determined by the Community Development Director with appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission. F. Parking in Areas Zoned "Commercial Common": Uses located on lots less than 20,000 square feet in areas with a zoning designation of "Commercial Common" are not required to meet the minimum parking schedule herein listed. The off-street parking provided in the common parking areas shall be deemed sufficient to meet the off-street parking demands for the uses on the lots under 20,000 square feet. Uses on lots 20,000 square feet or more in size, that are located in an area zoned "Commercial Common", shall meet at least the minimum off-street parking demand on the lot where the use is located, in accordance with the schedule herein provided in this ordinance. Page 14 of 21 July 2006 Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 G. Schedule. 1. Residential Use: a. One -or two-family residence: ................. 2 per dwelling unit b. Multiple dwellings: Efficiency units..... ..................................... 11/2 per dwelling unit One -bedroom units .................................. 11/2 per dwelling unit Two or more bedroom units... ................ 2 per dwelling unit Multiple dwellings shall also provide guest parking at a rate of .25 parking spaces per dwelling unit. C. Rooming houses, fraternities, bed, sororities, resident clubs, lodges d. Mobile home parks and per subdivision e. Model Homes f. Truck Rental Spaces Z. Commercial sales and service: a. Restaurants, bars, cocktail floor area b. Drive-in food or drink places floor area, with on-site consumption C. Mortuaries, funeral homes 1 per sleeping room or 1 per whichever is greater 2 per mobile home site, plus 1 2 employees; 1 per 404 square feet of recreation hall or club house area 1 for each person stationed on site, plus two spaces 1 per truck with a minimum of 4 spaces 1 per 50 sq. feet of useable lounges 1 per 50 sq. feet of useable plus 1 per 2 -employees 1 space for each 75 sq. feet of G.F.A. of public assembly area Page 15 of 21 July 2006 Page 16 of 21 July 2006 Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 d. Self-service laundries and 1 per 2 machines dry cleaners e. Open air businesses 1 ;per 500 sq. ft. of sales area for the first 2,000 plus 1 per additional 2,000 sq ft f. Auto sales lots 1 per each 300 sq. feet of office area and covered parking area, 2 for the first 1.0,000 sq. feet or portion thereof, and 1 for each additional 10,000 ft. or portion thereof; plus 1 per employee g. Gas service stations 1 per each 375 sq. feet of building h. Car wash: 1 per employee, plus reserve spaces equal to 5 times the wash capacity L Motor vehicle and machinery 1 per 200 sq, feet of floor area. j. Planned shopping centers Requirements for all uses under unified control elsewhere specified herein, plus 1 per 250 sq ft of gross leasable space k. Barbershops, beauty shops 2 per service chair 1. Furniture and appliance 1 per 800 sq. feet floor area stores, household equipment M. Supermarkets, drugstores 1 per 250 sq. feet of gross leasable space n. Hotels, motels 1 per guest room or suite, plus 1 per 2 employees Page 16 of 21 July 2006 3. Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 a. Bus depots 1 per 150 sq. feet of waiting roam space P- Skating rinks, dance halls, 1 per 3 persons of maximum dance studios capacity permitted by fire regulations q. Bowling alleys 4 per bowling lane, plus 1 per seat in gallery, plus 1 per 2 employees r. Billiard parlors 1 per 2 billiard tables, plus 1 per 2 employees S. Gymnasiums, health studios 1 per 400 sq. feet. of usable floor area, Pius 1 per 2 employees t. Private golf clubs, swimming, 1 per every 5 member and tennis clubs families or individuals U. Theaters, auditoriums, 1 per 4 -person occupancy gymnasiums and similar capacity places of public assembly Offices and Clinic Uses: a. Offices, banks, savings and 1 per 250 sq. feet of floor gross or loan agencies area b. Medical and dental offices 1 per 100 sq. feet of waiting and clinics examination room or dental chair plus 1 per 2 employees G. Nursing homes, convalescent 1 per 4 beds homes, and homes for the aged Schools and Institutions: a. Elementary and 1 per employee intermediate schools Page 17 of 21 July 2006 Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 b. High schools I per 8 students, plus I per employee C. Junior colleges, colleges, I per 3 enrolled full-time day students universities plus 1 per 2 employees d. Trade schools, business I per 150 sq. feet of gross college floor area e. Hospitals 1 per 2 beds, plus 1 per employee f. Churches, community I space per each 75 sq. feet of centers, assembly halls, G.F.A. for the public clubs, and libraries S. Manufacturing and industrial uses: a. Manufacturing 2 per every 3 employees b. Telemarketing, Data 1 per 50 square feet Processing Centers C. Other industrial uses 1 per 300 square feet d. Warehousing or wholesaling I per 800 square feet e. Mini -Storage I per 35 spaces; plus 1 for the manager f. Truck Rental Spaces 1 per truck with a minimum of 4 spaces H. Off -Street Loading and Unloading Spaces, 1. Unless otherwise specified in this Ordinance, off-street loading and unloading spaces shall have a minimum width of twelve (12) feet, a minimum length of forty-five (45) feet and a minimum height of fourteen (14) feet, exclusive of access aisles and maneuvering space. Page 18 of 21 3uly 2006 Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance Chapter 7 Z. Off-street loading and unloading spaces with a minimum width of ten (10) feet and a minimum length of thirty (30) feet may be provided for all or part of the required number of off-street loading and unloading spaces if approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission through the conceptual site plan approval process. 3. Off-street loading and unloading spaces shall not be permitted in any required front yard, or in any required side yard, except in nonresidential districts. Off-street loading and unloading spaces may occupy all or any part of a required rear yard, except as otherwise provided herein, and may be partially or entirely enclosed within a building. All off --street loading and unloading loading spaces abutting residential zoning districts shall be screened from the residential zoning districts by a masonry wall not less than eight (8) feet in height, 4. Where a building or use in a nonresidential district abuts an alley, such alley may be used as maneuvering space for off-street loading and unloading spaces. No alley abutting any residential district may be so used. 5. Off-street loading and unloading spaces, aisles, and access drives shall be paved so as to provide a durable dust -proof surface and shall be so graded and drained so as to dispose of surface water without damage to private or public properties, street, or alleys. S. Schedule of off-street loading and unloading space requirements: Unless otherwise provided in the Ordinance, every office, hotel, restaurant, department store, hospital, industrial plant, manufacturing establishment, retail establishment, storage warehouse or wholesale establishments, and all other structures devoted to similar mercantile or industrial pursuits, which has a aggregate gross floor area of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more shall provide off-street loading and unloading spaces in accordance with the 'following table: Page 19 of 21 Judy 2006 APPENDIX E SHARED PARKING MODEL 6k CivTech Project: CDppefflynd Resort (17-0210) Location.- 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain Hills, Arizona Date-- August 12, 2017 Scenario: Phase 1 (140 rooms north side and conference space) SHARED PARKING MODEL -WEEKDAY Land Use Guest Roorns(0 EmployeeSJ2� MeetinglBanquet Rooms (3� Existing Restaurant & Members 141 Total Re q'd Parking Size 172 Keys 57 Emp 7,890 SF Parking Demand 107.55 28.38 78-90 44,00 259.93 Beginning Hour Percent of peak Demand No. of Parking Spaces� Perce t No. of �n of Peak Parking Demand Spacesi Percent of Peak Demand No.of Parking Spaces Percent of Peak Demand No.of Parking ar ing Spaces 11 Total Shared Parking Demand 6:00 AM 100% 108 5% 1 0% a 8 117 7:00 AM 96% 103 30% 9 0% 0 20 132 8:00 AM 90% 97 90% 26 30% 24 33 180 9:00 AM 87% 94 90% 26 60% 47 44 211 10:00 AM 82% 88 100% 1 28 60% 47 36 199 11:00 AM 77% 83 100% 28 60% 47 35 193 12:00 PM 77% 83 100% 28 65% 51 35 197 11.00 PM 751/10 81 100% 28 65% 51 24 184 2:00 PM 7316 79 100% 28 65% 51 31 189 3:00 PM 70% 75 100% 28 65% 51 25 179 4:00 PM 71% 76 90% 26 65% 51 27 180 5:00 PM 70% 75 70% 20 100% 79 25 199 6:00 PM 74% 80 40% 11 100% 79 34 204 7:00 PM 75% 81 20% 6 100% 79 36 202 8:00 PM 79% 85 20% 6 1100% 79 17 187 9:00 PM 85% 91 20% 6 1009 79 14 190 10:00 PM 87% 94 20% 6 50% 39 139 1.1:04 PM 97% 104 10% 3 11 C% 0 107 12:00 AM 100°10 108 5% 1 0010 0 109 211 1. Hourly percentages are from ITE Parking Generation, 41h Edition for ITE Code 310 (Hotel). 2. Hourly percentages from Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 2nd EdItion, for Hotel Employees were utilized. 3. Hourly percentages from Urban Land ;nsiftle's Shafad Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel Conferemelllanqm( were utilized. 4. Obtained from Existing Parking Counts Project: Copper Wynd Resort (17-0210) Location: 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain Hills, Arizona Date. August 12, 2017 Scenario: Phase 1 (140 rooms north side and conference space) SHARED PARKING MODEL -WEEKEND Land Use Guest Rciorns(l) Employees i2) Meeting/Banquet Roomsf3} Existing Restaurant 8 Members (4j Total Req'd Parking Size 172 Keys 57 Emp 7,890 SIF Parking Demand— 107.55 28.38 78-90 57.00 271.83 Beginning Hour Percent of Peak Demand No. of Parking Spaces Percent of Peak Demand No, of Parking Spaces Percent of Peak Demand No. Parking Spaces Percent of No. of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Total Shared Parking Demand 6:00 AM 1100% 108 5% 1 0% 0 2 ill 7;00 AM 960/0 103 30% 9 0% 0 8 120 8:00 AM 90% 97 26 30% 24 17 164 9:00 AM 87% 94 90% 26 60% 47 49 1 216 10:00 AM 82% 80 100% 2860% 47 52 215 11.00 AM 77% 83 100% 28 60% 47 198 12:00 PM 77% 83 100% 28 65-A 51 182 1:00 PM 75% 81 100% 28 650/0 51 25 185 2:00 PM 734% 79 100% 28 650% 51 —1 28 186 3:00 PM 70% 75 100% 28 651/6 51 28 182 4:00 PM 71% 76 90% 26 65% 51 26 179 5:00 PM 70% 75 75% 21 100% 79 19 194 6:00 PM 74% so 60% 17 100% 79 49 225 7W PM 75% 811 55% 161100% 79 57 233 8:00 PM 79% 85 55% 16 100% 79 43 223 9= PM 85% 91 55% 16 100% 7941 227 10:00 PM 87% 94 45% 13 50°% 39 146 11:00 PM 97% 104 1 45% 13 0% 0 L 117 12:00 AM 100% 1 o F-3076 9 0% 0 117 jj 11 233 1. Hourly percenlages are from fTE Parking Generation, Qh EdWon for ITE Code 310 t Hotel). 2. Houdy percenlages from Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 2nd Edition for Holet Employees were utilized, 3. Hou-dy percenlages from Urban Land ;nstitufe's Shared Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel Conferenceil5anquet were utilized. 4- Obtained frcm Existing ParkiN Counts Project: CapperWynd Resort (17-0210) Location, 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain Hills, Arizona Date: August 12. 2017 Scenario: Phase 2 SHARED PARKING MODEL -WEEKDAY Land Use Guest Roornst'} Employees(2) Meeting Roornsl3� Existing 1 Restaurant & Members 14} Total Req'd Parking Size 250 Keys 83 Emp 7,890 SF Parking Demand 156.32 41.25 78.90 44.00 320.47 Beginning Flour Percent No. of of peak Parking demand Spaces Percent No" of of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Percent of No. of Peak Parking Demand spaces Percent No. of of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Total Shared Parking Demand 6:00 AM 100% 156 5% 2 0% 0 8 166 7:00 AM 96% 150 30% 12 0% 0 20 182 5:00 AM 90°% 141 90% 37 30%n 24 33 235 9:00 AM 87% 136 90% 37 600ri6 47 44 264 10:00 Aho 82% 128 100% 41 60°16 47 36 252 11:00 AM 77% 120 100% 41 60% 47 35 243 112:00 PM 77% 120 100% 41 65% 51 35 1 247 1:00 PM 75% 117 100% 41 65°% 51 24fl242 2:00 PM 73% 114 41 G5%o 51 31 3:00 PM 70% 109 _100°% 1000% 41 65% 51 25 4:00 PM 71% 711 90% 37 65% 51 27 5:00 PM 70% 109 70°% 29 100°% 79 256:00 PM 74%© 116 40% 17 100% 79 347:00 PM 75% 117 20% 8 100%0 79 3+16 8:00 PM 79% 123 20% 8 100% 79 17 227 9:00 PM 85% 133 20% 8 100% 79 14 234 10:00 PM 87% 136 20% 8 50% 39 18.3 11;00 PM 97% 152 10% 4 0% 0 156 12:00 AM 100% 156 5% 2 0% 0 I 158 264 1. Haudy percentages are from JTr= Parking Generation, 4th Edition for ITE Cade 310 (Hotel). 2. Hourly percentages from Urban Land InslituWs Shared Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel Employees were ul zed. 3. Hourly percentages from Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel ConferencelBanquet were utilized. 4. Obtained ftom Existing Parking Counts Project: CopperWynd Resort (17-4210) Location: 132251. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain Hills, Arizona Date: August 12, 2017 Scenario: Phase 2 SNARED PARKING MODEL -WEEKEND Land Use Guest RoomsM EmployeeS121 Meeting RooMSC3} Existing Restaurant & Members (4) Total Req'd Parking Size 250 Keys 83 Emp 7,€91) SF Parking Demand 156.32 41.25 78.90 57.00 333.47 Beginning Hclur Percent No. of of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Percent' No' of of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Percent of No_ of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Percent of No. of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Total Shared Parking Demand 6:00 AM 100°% 156 5% 2 0% 0 2 164 7:00 AM 96% 150 30% 12 0% 0 8 170 8:00 AM 90% 141 90% 37 30% 24 17 219 9:00 AM 87% 136 908% 37 608% 47 49 269 10:00 AM 82% 128 100% 41 600% 47 52 268 11:00 AM 778,E 120 100% 41 60% 47 40 248 12:00 PM 778% 120 1006)0+ 41 650/6 51 20 232 1:00 PM 75% 117 1.00% 41 65% 51 25 234 2:00 PM 73010 114 100% 41 55% 51 28 234 3:00 PM 70°% ` 109 100% 41 65% 51 28 229 4:00 PM 71% 111 90% 37 65% 51 26 225 5:00 PM 70% 109 75% 31 100°% 79 19 238 6:00 PM 740/6 116 60% 25 100% 79 49 269 7.00 PM 75°% 117 55% 23 1 CO % 79 57 276 8:00 PM 798% 123 55°% 23 100% 79 43 268 9:00 PM 858% 133 558% 23 100°% 79 41 276 10:00 PM 870% 136 45°% 19 50% 39 194 11:00 PM 978% 152 45°% 19 0% 0 171 12:00 AM 1008% 156 30% 12 0% 0 168 276 1. Hourly percentages are trorn ITE Parking Generatron, 41h Edition for ITE Code 310 (Hotel). 2. Hourly percentages from Urban Land Institutes Shared Parking. 2nd Edition for Hotel Employees were utilized. 3. Hourly percentages from Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 2nd EdWan for Hotel ConferencetBanquet were utilized. 4- Obtained from Existing Parking Counts Project: CapperWynd Resort (17-0210) Location; 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain Dills. Arizona Date: August 12, 2017 Scenario: Full Build SHARED PARKING MODEL -WEEKDAY Land Use Guest Roorns(>I) EmployeesM MeetinglBanquet Roomsf31 Existing Restaurant & Members t'1 Total Req'd Parking Size 300 Keys 99 Emp t1,7c:.0 SF Parking Demand 187.918 49.5O 117.60 44.00 398.68 Beginning Hour Percent of Peak Demand No. of Parking Spaces Percent No. of of Peak Parking. Demand! Spaces Percent of No. of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Percent of No. of Peak Parking 1 Demand Spaces Total Shared Parking Demand 6:00 AM 100% 188 5% j 2 0% 0 8 198 7:00 AM 96% 180 30% I 15 0% 0 20 1 215 8:00 AM 90°x6 169 90% 45 30% 35 33 282 9:00 AM 67% 183 90% 45 60% 71 44 323 10:00 AM 82% 154 100% 50 60% 71 36 311 11:00 AM 77% 144 10011/0 50 60% f 71 35 300 12.00 PM 77% 144 100% 50 65°Io 76 35 305 1;00 PM 75% 141 100% 50 65% 76 24 291 2:00 PM 73% 137 100% 50 65% 76 31 294 100 PM 70% 131 100% 50 65% 76 25 282 4:00 PM 71% 133 90% 45 65% 76 27 281 5:00 PM 70°x6 131 70°la 35 100'/0 118 25 309 5:00 PM 74% 13+9 40% 20 100% 118 34 311 TOG PM 75% 141 20% 10 100% 118 36 305 &00 PM 79% 148 20% 10 10% % 118 17 293 9:00 PM 85%. 159 20% 10 100% 118 14 301 10:00 PM 87% 163 20% 10 50% 59 232 11:D0 PM 97% 182 10% S 0% 0 187 12:0f7 AM 100% 188 5T. 2 C% 0 1910 323 1. HouOy percentages are from ITE Parking Generation, 4th Edition for ITE Cade 310 (Hotel). 2. Hourly percentages from Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel Em&yees were utilized. 3. Hourly percentages from Urban Land Institute's Snared Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel Confere nce Banquet were utilized. 4. Obtained from Existing Parking Counts Project: Copp erWynd Resort (17-0210) Location: 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain Hills.„ Arizona. Date: August 12. 2017 Scerxarin: Full Build SHARED PARKING MODEL -WEEKEND Land Use Guest Roomsl'I Employees (2) MeetingfBanquet Rooms (3) Existing Restaurant & Members (4) Total Req'd Parking Size 300 Keys 99 Emp 11,760 5F Parking Demand 157.58 49.50 117.60 57.00 411.68 Beginning llatJfDemand Percent No- of of Peak Parking Spaces Percent No. of of Peak Parking demand Spaces Percent of Peak Demand No. of Parking Spaces Percent of No. of Peak Parking Demand Spaces Total Shared Parking demand 6:00 AAA 100% 188 510 1 2 0`i® 0 2 192 7:00 AM 96% 180 30% 15 0-% 0 8 203 8:04 AM 90% 169 90% 45 30% 35 17 266 9:00 AM 87i% 163 90% 45 60% 71 49 328 10:00 AM 82% 154 100% 50 60% 71 52 327 11:00 AM 77% 144 100% 50 60% 71 40 305 12:00 PM 77010 144 100% 50 65% 76 20 290 1:00 PM 75% 141 100% 50 65% 76 25 292 2:00 PM 730% 137 100% b0 65% 76 28 291 3:00 PM 700/ 131 1000 50 65% 76 28 285 4:00 PM 71% 133 90`Y0 45 65% 76 26 280 5.00 PM 70% 131 75% 37 10G% 118 19 305 6:00 PM 74% 139 641% 30 100% 118 49 336 7:00 PM 75% 141 55% 27 100% 118 57 343 8:00 PM 79°l0 148 55% 27 100% 118 43 336 9:04 PM 85% 159 55% 27 1410010 118 41 345 10:00 PM 87% 163 45% 22 50% 59 244 11:00 PM 97% 182 45% 22 0% 0 204 12:00 AM 100% 188 30% 15 0% 0 203 345 1. i-Haurty percentages are from ITE Parking Generation, 4th Edition for ITE Code 310 (Hotel). 2. Hourly percentages fram Urban Land Institute's Snared Parking, 2nd Edita4n for Hotel Enptayees were utilized. 3- Hourly percentages from Urban Land Instilute's. Shared Parking, 2nd Edition for Hotel ConferencelHanquet were utilized. 4. Obtained from Existing Parking Counts APPENDIX F COMPARISON TABLE TO SIMILAR RESORTS CivTech Comparison of Barking Prouidpd of Similar Resorts Resort Guest Units Meeting Space (KSE) Meeting Space per Room (SE/Room) Rooms per KSE of Meeting Space Parking Provided Parking per KSE of Meeting Spare Spaces per Key Scottsdale Plaza 404 an 99.0 10.1 403 10A 9 .nn Scottsdale Mondrian-Srottsdale(') 2nn 5 25.0 40.n 200 40.0 1.00 Carefree Resort & Villas -Carefree 4F.1; 34 73.9 93.7 240 7.1 0.52 noubletree Paradise Valley- Scottsdale121- '17R ,In 7A.4 12.6 55A 9 8.6 1.48 Hilton Scottsdale Resort & Spa - Scottsdale (2)(3) 187 23 9 93.0 8.1 325 14.9 9.74 Hyatt Regency Resort K Spa - Scottsdale 4An 35 71.4 94.n 900 25.7 1.84 Westward I ook Resort - Tucson (2) 244 2n 82.0 12.2 47n 93..r, 9.A3 ,!W Mariott Starr Pass Resort & Spa- Tiicsonl2�(3} 575 RR 953.n 6.5 1 500 5.7 0.87 -Average 367-9 1 '34.4 gg_2 14.7 449.6 18.1 1.30 CopperWynd Phase 1 972 7.89 45.9 91.9 2X;0 31.7 1.45 ropperWynd Phase 2 250 7.AP 39.n 31.7 420 53.9 1.68 CopperWynd Phase 3 300 11.32 3q.4 25.4 346 29.3 9.9 1. Existing counts revealed a demand of 0.49 spaces per room. 2. Overflow Parking is avaiiahle. 3. Parking Problem has been reonrted, however meeting/haUrnnm space is greater than 20 KSF and is large compared to ar,mhPr of rnnI22s. rhe parking,ger KSF of meeting space is signficantly lass than the 30 spaces per KSF of meeting space recommended per 1111 Shared parking. 2nd Edition. APPENDIX G ITE PARKING GENERATION ClvTech Project: CopperWynd Resort (17-0210) Location: 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive - Fountain kills, Arizona Date: 8/12/2017 ITE Porking Generotion, 4th Edition Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. Occupied Rooms On a: Weekday Location: Suburban Statistic Peak Period Number of Study Sites Average Size of Study Sites Average Peak Period Parking Demand Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation 95% Confidence Interval Range 85th Percentile 33rd Percentile Peak Period Demand 12;00-1:00 PM; 7:00-10:00 PM; 11:40 - 5:00 AM 20 315 Occupied Rooms 0.89 vehicles per occupied room 0.31 35% 0.75-1.02 vehicles per occupied room 0.61-1.94 vehicles per occupied room 1.08 vehicles per occupied room 0.72 vehicles per occupied room Average parking supply ratio: 13 spaces per room for suburban sites (12 study sites) and 1.0 space per room for urban sites (two study sites) Size (occupied rooms): 172 Average Peak Period Parking Demand: 154.00 85th Percentile Parking Demand: 1.86.00 Size (occupied rooms): 250 Average Peak Period Parking Demand: 223.00 85th Percentile Parking Demand: 270.00 Size (occupied rooms): 300 Average Peak Period Parking 'Demand: 267.00 85th Percentile Parking Demand: 324.00 EXHIBIT D-Traffic Stull v CoPperWynd Resort and Club Renovation Traffic Impact Analysis 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive Fountain Hills, Arizona March 2017 Project No. 17-0212 Prepared For: Palisades Resorts, LLC 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Dr. Fountain Hills, AZ 85288 For Submittal to: Town of Fountain Hills Prepared By: CivTech 10605 North Hayden Road Suite 140 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 480-659-4250 CCPPERWYND RESORT & CLUB EXPANSICN TRAFFIC IMRACT ANAINSIE 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Drive Fountain Hil Is, Arizona Rrepaned BM: C iv1TeC h -Oj Civllech, Incl. 10605 North Hayden Roadp Suite 140 Scotisdale, P nizona 85260 (480', 659-4290 Ric pared fc1r, Palisades Resorts, LLC 131225 N. Eagle Ridc a Dr Rountain Hills, AA 85288 For SuHrr ittal to: llotAn of Fourllain Hills N arch '9 011 OivTech project No. '17-(2,121 Oxpireis '12-11—,21018 CoppmrVVyndRmsortandC|ub—FountminHiUe,Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTOF TABLES ____._._.____,_~_,~,~,,~.~,,~^~,~.^,~~,,~,,_________,,,,,~,.~.,~11 LIST[>FFIGURES ............................................................................................................ III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 4 PURPOSE {)FREPORT AND STUDY OBJECTIVES ................................................. 4 STUDY AREA AND ANALYSIS YEARS ..... .................... ........................................... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 6 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USE ............................ ............................... 0 ROADWAYNETWORK ... ............................ .............................................................. D INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS... --------6 TRAFFIC \/{}LL]K4ES -------.-----... 7 EXISTING CAPACITY ANALYSIS .................................. .......................................... 10 PROPOSEDDEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 11 LAND USE AND INTENSITY .................................................................................. �11 SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION .................................................................. ...... 11 PHASING. ............................................................ ..................................................... 13 FUTURE TRAFFIC \/[)LUPNES...................................................................................... 13 TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION .............................................. 13 DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT ............................................................... 14 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ............................................................. ............ 16 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFF|C...................................................................................... 1O TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS .................................................................. 26 PEAK HOUR CAPACITY AN/\LYS[S—.............................. ............ ........................ 26 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 31 LISTOF REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 33 TECHNICAL APPENDIX ................................................................................................. 34 C ~ Th| March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club - Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Existing Intersection Traffic Control.............................................................7 Table 2: Level of Service Criteria............................................................................... 10 Table 3: Existing Peak Hour Levels-of-Service........................................................ 11 Table 4: Trip Generation Summary............................................................................14 Table 5: Trip Distribution by Percentage..................................................................16 Table 6. 2018 Projected Pear Hour Levels of Service .............................................. 26 Table 7: 2023 Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service .............................................. 27 Table 8: 2028 Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service .............................................. 27 Table 9: Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service with a Traffic Signal .................... 29 1 CIVTech °i March 2017 c:7 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF FIGURES Figure1: Vicinity Map................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2: Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls ................................... 8 Figure 3: Existing Traffic Volumes.............................................................................. 9 Figure4: Site Plan....................................................................................................... 12 Figure 5: Trip Distribution.......................................................................................... 15 Figure 6: Site Phase 1 Traffic Volumes..................................................................... 17 Figure 7: Site Phase 2 Traffic Volumes..................................................................... 18 Figure 8: Site Phase 3 Traffic Volumes..................................................................... 19 Figure 9: 2018 Background Traffic Volumes............................................................ 20 Figure 10: 2023 Background Traffic Volumes.......................................................... 21 Figure 11: 2028 Background Traffic Volumes.......................................................... 22 Figure 12: 2018 Total Traffic Volumes....................................................................... 23 Figure 13: 2023 Total Traffic Volumes....................................................................... 24 Figure 14: 2028 Total Traffic Volumes....................................................................... 25 Figure 15: Future Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls .................................. 30 CIVTech iil March 2017 i�� CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents a traffic impact and mitigation analysis performed for the proposed improvements to the CopperWynd Resort and Club located on the northwest corner of Eagle Ridge Drive and Copperwynd Drive in Fountain Hills, Arizona. The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented in this study. Site Plan and Access Renovations are proposed for the CopperWynd Resort and Club in Fountain Hills, Arizona. Redevelopment is proposed in phases and will consist of a total of 300 rooms and an addition of 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space at full build- out. A restaurant and fitness/tennis club is currently on-site and will remain with the redevelopment. A conceptual site plan is included in Figure 4. The site Calan depicts maintaining the two (2) existing driveways as public entrances. The driveway on Eagle Ridge Drive is the main entrance and is expected to facilitate most of guest enter/exit trips. The secondary driveway to Copperwynd Drive is expected to be used for event days as well as potentially staff though a small amount of guests could be expected_ The site plan also depicts an auxiliary driveway on Copperwynd Drive for deliveries. Trip Generation The rates provided for the iTF Trip Generation "Hotel" land use category are inclusive of all the uses on-site in addition to guest rooms. Therefore, separate trip generation was not conducted for the added meeting/banquet space. The peak period for the meetinglbanquet space would most likely occur on a Saturday and not during the weekday peak hours. The club membership wilt remain the same with the renovations, and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not expected to increase. The existing traffic count includes the trips from the club members and restaurant. Moreover, hotel restaurants and cocktail lounges are included in the "Hotel" rate. The trips associated with 32 of the analyzed 300 guest rooms are already accounted for in the existing traffic counts. This analysis calculates the expected increase in trips due to the 288 additional rooms. The proposed plan at full build -out is expected to generate an additional 180 trips (104 enter/76 exit) during the AM peak hour and an additional 198 trips (97 enter/101 exit) during the Pini peak hour. CivTech r March 2017 �O CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hilis, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Level of Service Analysis All existing intersections are evaluated to operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours. The study intersections are projected to operate at LOS C or better during the peak hours of all horizon years with the exception of Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard and Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge DrivelPalomino Boulevard. These two intersections are expected to operate at LOS E or F during one or more peak hour in 2023 and/or 2028. Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS E during the 2028 PM peak hour. This is due to the relatively high eastbound left turn movement where dual turn lanes facilitate a projected PM peak hour volume of 1,035 vehicles. Further analysis reveals that if the maximum green interval for the movement was increased to similar to the maximum green interval of the eastbound through movement, the intersection could operate at LOS C during the 2028 PM peak hour. Actual growth, may be less than projected as a 2.9 percent growth rate over a decade may be less likely given the limited area remaining for development in Fountain Hills, It is still recommended to ensure that the maximum green time is 'increased as future traffic volumes increase to ensure adequate operation. Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge DrivelPalomino Boulevard The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge DrivelPalomino Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS E or F in the 2023 and 2028 background and total conditions. This is mostly due to the relatively large through volume on Palisades Boulevard in relation to the increasing volume entering/exiting Eagle Ridge Drive. Signalization would mitigate the proposed delay associated with an all - way stop condition. The Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 2014) indicated that a the four-hour signal warrant is expected to be satisfied with the neighboring Adero Canyon development and trailhead at 17 percent of occupancy of planned townhomes and satisfying the eight-hour signal warrant at 29 percent occupancy. Depending on the timing of the build out of surrounding developments and growth of Background traffic volumes, a traffic signal may be warranted at full build -out of Phase 2 or Phase 3. Per the Town of Fountain Hills, a northbound left -turn lane on Palisades Boulevard shall be installed along with traffic signal conduit and pull boxes to prepare for a future traffic signal. These improvernents are recommended to be constructed prior to Phase 3 of the development, Per the Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 2014), "CivTech is concerned that there may not be sufficient sight distance for drivers intending to turn right on red from the side streets to see approaching vehicles on Palisades Boulevard or for drivers intending to turn left from C i v T e c h March 2017 i�ft� CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Palisades Boulevard to see opposing vehicles. Therefore, if and when a traffic signal is installed, we recommend prohibiting right turns on red for the east- and westbound approaches and we recommend protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard." Due to the sight distance restrictions, it is recommended to prohibit right turns on red for the eastbound and westbound approaches and provide protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard. A formal assessment should be conducted during the traffic signal design process. (6 C i v T e c h 3 March 2017 t� CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis INTRODUCTION Renovations are proposed for the CopperWynd Resort and Club in Fountain Hills, Arizona. Redevelopment is proposed in phases and will consist of a total of 300 rooms and an addition of 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space at full build -out, A restaurant and fitness/tennis club is currently on-site and will remain with the redevelopment. A location map is illustrated in Figure 1. CivTech Inc. has been retained by Palisades Resorts, LLC to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed CopperWynd Resort expansion. PURPOSE OF REPORT AND STUDY OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of the proposed expansion on the existing surrounding street system. The specific objectives of the study are; t To determine whether the planned street system in the vicinity of the site is adequate to accommodate the increased traffic that results from the proposed expansion; ♦ To recommend additional street improvements or traffic control devices, where necessary, to mitigate the site -generated traffic; and, t To evaluate the site access driveways. STUDY AREA AND ANALYSIS YEARS A preliminary trip generation indicated that the proposed expansion is anticipated to generate fewer than 500 trips during the weekday peak hour. The development is split into 3 phases. The analysis assumes 2018 as the opening year for Phase 1. Phase 2 and Phase 3 will be market driven and dependent on available funding. For analysis purposes, Phase 2 is considered in 2023 and Phase 3 in 2028. This TIA analyzes the AM peak Dour and PM peak hour on a weekday at the following intersections: r Eagle Ridge Drive & Copperwynd Drive Eagle Ridge Drive & Claud Crest Trail/Summit Drive North Summit Drive South & Eagle Ridge Drive Palisades Bfvd. & Eagle Ridge Drive/Palomino Blvd, Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd. `� CI VTech 4 March 2017 Source: C€vTech 2017 a, 8 SITE 60 i C©pperwYnd pr. x01 LIF Figure 1: Vicinity Map CivTech CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis EXISTING CONDITIONS EXIS TING AND SURROUNDING LAND USE The CopperWynd Resort is located at 13225 N. Eagle Ridge Road situated in the McDowell Mountains in Fountain Hills, Arizona. The existing resort and club comprises 32 resort rooms, a restaurant and a spa/fitness/tennis club. The club currently has approximately 300 members. A portion of the members walk from the surrounding neighborhood. The membership will remain the same with the renovations and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not expected to increase. The surrounding area is primarily residential. A residential condominium community, The Villas at Copperwynd, is located adjacent and northeast of the hotel, and the SunRidge Canyon Golf Club is northeast of the existing hotel. Construction is underway for the Adero Canyon development located to the northeast of the resort on Eagle Ridge Road. ROADWAY NETWORK The existing roadway network within the study area includes Eagle Ridge Drive, Copperwynd Drive, and Palisades Boulevard. Eagle Ridge Drive is a collector street beginning at Palisades Boulevard to the east and currently ends west of CopperWynd Resort. Eagle Ridge Drive in the vicinity of the site is under the jurisdiction of the City of Scottsdale and is a two-lane roadway divided by a raised median. Each direction consists of 10 feet of pavement including a travel lane and bike lane. 'No parking' signs are posted, and the posted speed limit is 35 mph. Eagle Ridge Drive is being extended with the construction of the Adero Canyon development. Copperwynd Drive is a private local street providing access from Eagle Ridge Drive to an existing employee lot for the resort, and it also provides private gated access to the existing 'The Villas at Copperwynd' condominium community. Adjacent to the site, Copperwynd Drive is owned by Palisades Resorts, LLC, Palisades Boulevard is an arterial that loops around from Fountain Hills Boulevard to the east and heads south to Shea Boulevard. Palisades Boulevard is a four -lane roadway with two travel lanes and a bike lane in each direction divided by a raised median. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS The intersection of Eagle Ridge Drive and Copperwynd Drive is a T -intersection controlled by a stop sign with Copperwynd Drive stopping for Eagle Ridge Drive. The northbound approach consists a shared through/right-turn lane. The southbound approach has a dedicated left -turn lane (-110 feet of storage) and a through lane. The westbound approach consists of one shared lane.. The intersection of Eagle Ridge Drive and Cloud Crest Trail/Summit Drive North is a four -legged unsignalized intersection with stop control for the neighborhood streets. Tile C1VTech 6 March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis approaches on Eagle Ridge Drive consist of a dedicated left -tum lane (--115 feet of storage SB and —125 feet of storage NB) and a shared through/right-turn lane. The neighborhood approaches consist of one shared lane. The intersection of Eagle Ridge Drive and Summit !give South is a four -legged unsignalized intersection with stop control for Summit Drive South. The south leg is a vacant cul-de-sac. The westbound approach on Eagle Ridge Drive consists of a shared through/right-turn lane, and the eastbound approach consists of a dedicated left -turn lane (-100 feet of storage) and through lane. The intersection of Eagle Ridge Drive and Palisades Boulevard is a four -legged intersection controlled by an all -way stop. The northbound approach consists of a shared left-turn/through lane, a through lane, and a right -turn lane. The southbound approach consists of a left -turn lane, a through lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane, The eastbound and westbound approaches consist of a left -turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane. The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard is a four -legged signalized intersection. The northbound approach consists of a left -turn lane and a shared throughlright-turn lane. The southbound approach consists of a left -turn lane, a through lane, and dual right -turn lanes (right -turn on arrow only). The eastbound approach consists of dual left -turn .lanes, three through lanes, and a dedicated right -turn lane. The westbound approach consists of a left -turn lane, three through lanes, and a dedicated right -turn lane. The existing lane configuration and traffic control is illustrated in Figure 2, and the existing stop control at each of the study intersections is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Existing Intersection Traffic Control Study ID Intersection Traffic Control 1 Eagle Ridge Drive & Copperwynd Drive One-way Stop (WB) 2 Eagle Midge Drive & Cloud Crest Trail/Summit Drive North Two-way Stop (EBIWB) 3 Summit Drive South & Eagle Ridge Drive Two-way Stop (NB/SB) 4 Palisades Blvd. & Eagle Ridge Drive/Palomino Blvd. All -way Stora 5 Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd, Traffic Signal TRAFFIC VOLUMES CivTech engaged Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc. to record traffic volumes at the study intersections within the project vicinity. Peak hour volume turning movement counts were performed from 7:00-10:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM on Thursday, February 2, 2016. The peak 60 minute traffic volumes during the observed times is considered typical peak hour traffic volumes for purposes of this study. The existing turning movement volumes are depicted in Figure 3 for the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The traffic volume data obtained for this study have been included in Appendix B. C i v T e c h 7 March 2017 E3 Eagle RedgeDr & Oopponhynd Dr Eagle Ridge Dr & Sennmit Dr N lades BW & EagleRldge Dr Palisades MA Shea BW Eagle Ridge Dr & Across A Ceppe wynd Dr d Access B Sor rce: EiuTech 2017 M *S.1 T E r ! CaPFerw`1 Empty 0 Q 4r4 N �xf y�F LEGEND © Thm or Turning Mh—ment Tral°rrc Srgnal tsa€en Tw Way LekTUMst� � ''F+J Si NNORTHRTNORTHA iC Speed Limit IC ' airedtiun. or I�agie 7�idge [Srive —11M Q Shea 69vd. w i � Figure 1: Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls CivTech Eagle Ridge Df & Summit Dr 5 AL 7[121 Eagle Ridge Dr& Cppperwynd Dr 0 i�46 e r N w 17[-1 22[16] 1[61 3[4] 29[311 3201 cv Palisades !3iad 8 Eagle Ridge Di - M O nlryry��7 ^+l 1 - - 23[401 I Eagle Ridge Dr E Axm A Source: GvTech 2017 A 0 o �r — 5'i3] 4131 010] 1101 0101 1101 R = Eagle Ridge dr & Sumrn-4 Dr M 0 w 255816761 W51 433112581 95916031 71151 1[4] ri s^ r Palisades Blvd & Shea Wd 0 0 i Coppenvynd Dr& Access B 0 n — 0[1] 0[21] 14 50[541 72[47] 0[11 1101 � o- p Eagle Ridge Dr 8 Summit Di S LEGEND XX(XX)-AM(PM)?eakliourTraft\kgumes M ❑imefi n of Eagle Ridge give SITE GnPPeTwf fad NORTH Shea 8lvd- 157 Figure 3: Ex stfng Traffic Volumes OvTech 1 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain kills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis EXISTING CAPACITY ANALYSIS Peak hour capacity analyses have been conducted for the study intersections based on existing intersection configurations and traffic volumes. All intersections have been analyzed using the methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Special Report 209, and Updated 2010 and using Synchro software, version 9.0 under the HCM 2010 methodology. The concept of level of service (LOS) uses qualitative measures that characterize operational conditions within the traffic stream. The individual levels of service are described by factors that include speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations A through F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions. Levels of service for intersections are defined in terms of delay ranges. Table 2 lists the level of service criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections, respectively. Table 2: Level of Service Criteria Level of Service _ Control Relay (seconds/vehicle) Signalized Intersections Unsi nalized Intersections A 510 5 10 B _.-.._...................... ...._ > 10-20 > 10-15 C> 20-35 > 15-25 _. D > 35-55 > 25-35 E > 55-80 > 35-50 F 3 80 > 50 Source. Exhibit 18-4 and Exhibit 19-1, Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Results of the existing level of service analyses are shown in Table 3 for the AM and PM peak hours. The existing conditions analysis worksheets have been included in Appendix C. CIVTech 10 March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Table 3: Existing Peak Hour Levels -of -Service All existing intersections are evaluated to operate at LCIS D or better during the peak hours. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LAND USE AND INTENSITY The renovation of the CopperWynd Resort and Club will include a total of 300 rooms and 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space at full build -out. The resort already includes 32 guestrooms (captured in existing traffic counts). Therefore, the remodel will create a net increase of approximately 268 guestrooms. The existing resort has a restaurant and a spa/fitness/tennis club. The club currently has approximately 300 members. A portion of the members walk from the surrounding neighborhood. The membership will remain the same with the renovations, and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not expected to increase. The existing traffic count includes the trips from the club members and restaurant. A conceptual site plan is included in Figure 4. SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The site plan depicts maintaining the two (2) existing driveways as public entrances. The driveway on Eagle Ridge Drive is the main entrance and is expected to facilitate most of guest enter/exit trips. The secondary driveway to Copperwynd Drive is expected to be used for event days as well as potentially staff though a small amount of guests could be expected. The site plan also depicts an auxiliary driveway on CopperWynd Drive for deliveries. 1/ C i V T e c h 11 March 2017 Traffic AM(PM) LDS Existin ID Intersection Control Movement/Approach 1 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Copperwynd Dr, 1 -Way WB Shared A (A) Stop EB SB Left R A) 2 -Way NB Left A (A) 2 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Cloud Crest Stop S8 Left A (A) TR./Summit Drive North (EBfWB) EB Shared A (A) WB Shared A A Summit Drive South & Eagle Ridge 2 -Way NB Shared A (A) 3 Dr. Stop SB Shared A (A) NB/SB EB Left R A) NB Approach B (D) SB Approach D (B) 4 Palisades 'Blvd. & Eagle Ridge All -Way EB Approach B (B) Dr./Palomino Bivd, Stop WB Approach B B) Overall D (C) NB Approach D (D) SB Approach B (B) 5 Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd. Signal EB Approach C (C) WB Approach C (C) Overall C C A Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway A 1 -Way Stop (EB) SB Left WB Shared --(--j A (A) B Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway B 1 -Way SB Shared A (A) Step (SB) EB Shared R (A) All existing intersections are evaluated to operate at LCIS D or better during the peak hours. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LAND USE AND INTENSITY The renovation of the CopperWynd Resort and Club will include a total of 300 rooms and 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space at full build -out. The resort already includes 32 guestrooms (captured in existing traffic counts). Therefore, the remodel will create a net increase of approximately 268 guestrooms. The existing resort has a restaurant and a spa/fitness/tennis club. The club currently has approximately 300 members. A portion of the members walk from the surrounding neighborhood. The membership will remain the same with the renovations, and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not expected to increase. The existing traffic count includes the trips from the club members and restaurant. A conceptual site plan is included in Figure 4. SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The site plan depicts maintaining the two (2) existing driveways as public entrances. The driveway on Eagle Ridge Drive is the main entrance and is expected to facilitate most of guest enter/exit trips. The secondary driveway to Copperwynd Drive is expected to be used for event days as well as potentially staff though a small amount of guests could be expected. The site plan also depicts an auxiliary driveway on CopperWynd Drive for deliveries. 1/ C i V T e c h 11 March 2017 Source: CivTech 2017 Figure 4: Site Plan and Access CivTech CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis PHASING The development is split into 3 phases. Phase 1 is assumed to open in 2018 with 128 total guestrooms. Sixty rooms will be added in Phase 2 and Phase 2 and Phase 3 will be market driven and dependent on available funding. For analysis purposes, Phase 2 is considered in 2323 and Phase 3 in 2028. FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION The potential trip generation for the proposed school was estimated utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 91h Edition and Trip Generation Handbook, 31-d Edition. The ITE Trip Generation Manual contains data collected by various transportation professionals for a wide range of different land uses. The data are summarized in the report and average rates and equations have been established that correlate the relationship between an independent variable that describes the development size and generated trips for each categorized land use. The report provides information for daily and peak hour trips.. The rates for LUC 310 (Hotel) are higher than those for LUC 330 (Resort Hotel) and therefore was utilized for a conservative analysis. ITE Land Use Category (LUC) 310 for a hotel has the following description: "'Hotels are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet rooms or convention facilities, limited recreational facilities (pool, fatness room), anchor other retail and service shops." Most of the hotels surveyed were primarily location in suburban areas outside of central business districts. The rates provided for the Hotel land use category are inclusive of all the uses on-site in addition to guest rooms. Therefore, separate trip generation was not conducted for the added meeting/banquet space. The peak period for the meeting/banquet space would most likely occur on a Saturday and not during the weekday peak, hours. The club membership will remain the same with the renovations, and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not expected to increase. The existing traffic count includes the trips from the club members and restaurant. Moreover, hotel restaurants and cocktail lounges are included in the Hotel rate. The trips associated with 32 of the analyzed 300 guest rooms are already accounted for in the existing traffic counts. This analysis calculates the expected increase in trips due to the 268 additional rooms. Table 4 summarizes the trip generation potential of the school. Detailed trip generation calculations are included in Appendix D. CiVTech 13 March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club -- Fountain Hills, Arizona Table 4: Trip Generation Summary Traffic Impact Analysis Land Use ITE LUC Occupied Rooms Wee day Generated Trips AM Peak Haur I PM Peak Hour Enter ExiELTotall Enter Exit Total Resort Hotel - Phase 1 310 960 37 27 64 35 36 71 Resort Hotel - Phase 2 310 1660) 64 47 111 60 63 123 Resort Hotel - Phase 3 310 2680) 104 76 180 97 101 198 (1) Net increase in keyed guest rooms. The proposed plan at full buildout is expected to generate an additional 180 trips (104 enter/76 exit) during the AM peak hour and an additional 198 trips (97 enter/101 exit) during the PM peak hour. DISTRIBUTION ANIS TRIP ASSIGNMENT A single trip distribution pattern was assumed for this study. It is expected that the proposed development would generate trips during the peak hours based predominantly on where guests are initially arriving from, such as an airport or residential areas further away from Fountain Hills. Most trips are expected to use Shea Boulevard, west towards Scottsdale or SR -87, southwest towards Loop 202 and the remaining on Palisades Boulevard to commercial areas in Fountain Hills. The trip distribution is shown in Table 5 and depicted in Figure 5. E/ C i V T e c h 14 March 2017 C� CopperWYn' 50% Source: CivTech 21717 SITE 40% Figure 5: Trip Distribution 1 E CivTeeh J CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Table 5: Trip Distribution by Percentage Roadway To/From Distribution Shea Boulevard west 50% Shea Boulevard (to/from SR -87) East 40% Palisades Boulevard East 10% TOTAL TOTAL 100% The percentages were applied to the site generated trips based on likely routes to project site traffic at the intersections within the study area. The projected Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 peak hour site traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 6, Figure 7, and Figure 8, respectively. FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Additional traffic growth is expected to overall growth in the area. Future traffic volumes are commonly projected by applying a growth rate to existing traffic volumes. Historical ADT volumes on Shea Boulevard, retrievable on the City of Scottsdale's website indicated a decline in daily traffic volumes from 2012 to 2014. As such, this study refers to the methodology in the intersection needs assessment referenced above. The 2014 assessment considered a 2.9 percent annual growth rate, which is used in this study to be consistent. Actual growth may be less than projected as a 2.9 percent growth rate over a decade may be less likely given the limited area remaining for development in Fountain Hills. This rate equates to growth factors of 1.029, 1.187 and 1.370 for the 2018, 2023 and 2028 horizon years, respectively. Adero Canyon is a development project adjacent to the northwest of the site on Eagle Ridge Drive. The development is currently under construction and is expected to add trips to the study area. The study Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersecting Needs Assessment, sealed April 2014, projected traffic from the other/background development through the intersection of Eagle Ridge Drive and Palisades Boulevard. The assessment estimated a completion year of 2022. Those volumes were used and extrapolated to the remaining study intersections to add to existing traffic volumes in this the current study for the 2023 and 2028 horizon years. Selected excerpts from the assessment is included in Appendix E. Future background traffic volumes at the study intersections are projected by applying the appropriate growth factor to the existing traffic volumes and, if applicable, adding the generated traffic volumes of the adjacent development. The 2018, 2023 and 2028 background traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 9, Figure 10, and Figure 11, ,respectively. FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC Anticipated total traffic volumes were computed by adding the site generated traffic to the projected background traffic volumes. The 2018, 2023 and 2028 total traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 12, Figure 13, and Figure 14, respectively. C i v T e c h 16 March 2017 Eagte Ridge dr & Copperwynd Dr 0 I s o 0 0 3[4] 0[0] ©[0] 0[4i 24[32] 0[0[ CV C] G M � C eD Palisades Blvd & Eagle Rimae Dr Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr N -10-10 rb � v � 1 0[0114' DM 0[q3[ 0[R] II Palisades SW & Shea Bivd Eagle Ridge Or & Aoss A Source: CivTech 2017 Copperwy nd Ur & ftess B 7 ��T �� 4Wr 0[01 0[0p 27[161 371351 �► 0[01 0[01 o o T Eagle Ridge Ur & 5ummilDr S LEGEND MM-AM;PM} Peak How Traffic Volumes 110 Dirsc0on ur Eagle Ridge Drive O 010—ft—ft— NORTH b� v �.y CSR q� fi7 Shea Blvd. Figure 6 Site Phase I Traffic Vblumes COPPERWYND Resort r ql� CivrTech A �L a[a a[97 ] Eagle Ridge Dr& Cappe" Dr 0 14 aft 9CU] Palisades BW & Eagle FWgeOr Eagle Fudge Br & SurnnW Or M Palisades BW & Shea Blvd Eagle Ridge Dr &Access A Source- CivTech 2017 Coppmgnd N & Access S 4]a] o`o] 4159] 6F:57] a]a] alo] O i3 d C? O O Eagle IRidge €7r& Suomlt Dr S LEGEND XX{XX) -AM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Vol -sones DiroctpmofEagle "a anoe SITE Cap'Pe�n��r. Ei NORTH Shea Blvlj. 0 Figure 7: Site Phase 2TraffieVolumes C1VT lCh �f All, - �► — a]a] a]0] ® GN] I� Eagle E11dge Dr & Ceppm ynd Or 11 1014 0101 sa{ar] 0101 iz-Eo Sao Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr Eagle Ridge Dr & Summik Dr N r E5. - .��6 v r7 cam•` -� - 4[Ol 1[01: EY Pakadea Blvd & Shea Blvd Eagle Ridge Dr & Access A Source: CivTech 2017 Coppem nd Dr & Access B 0[0] O[al 7611011 104[971 10, 0[0] o[a] o Eagle Ridge Dr & SwrmA Dr S LEGEND X;)C(M - ) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes F 13hecBon of Eagle Ridge Drive SITE a Coppen.rynd DOWO Figure 8s Site Phase 3TrafficVolumes COPPERWYND Resort ; Club CivTech Eagle Ridge N & CopperwyM Df 9T M UPI] 23116] 1161 3jq 31[32] 35[2 l] �TT Fl� F7 MEN Palisades 6W & Eagle Ridge Do Eagle Ridge Or & Surrimil Or N CO ZT zc; ZT, .22 265[596) SSfiiT,, 446[1294] 9870201 7[15) 1 t41 P19sades Blvd & Siftea Blvd E Eagle Ridge Dr & Access A Source: CivTech 2017 Cappm.ynd Or &Aoccess 8 0 oil 1 c 01221 44 51 ]6151 7414? 1 001. 0;1] 1[0] EaoJe Ridge Dr & Summit Or S LEGEND XX(XX)-AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffir Volumes 1111� Direction of Eagle Ridge Drive SITE nn c,,ppeiwVdU'-0iD-' 1�0 t; M tD NORTH Shea Vvd- E Figure 9: 2018 Background Traffic Volumes CivTech 0 &lid] Eagle "E Cr & Coppemynd Dr co v "' w 44 70[1111] 26[19] 21[32] 19[3o] 0 114[92[ 42[241 L P � h CSV Palisades Blvd S Eagle Ridge Or rn a a 27[471 0 i Eagle Ridge Or & Access A 5aurm CivTech 2017 A p � w- 601 5[4] 010] .]0] W r* m N Eagfe Ridge Or & Sumak Or N rn' 329[BB3] 751128] — 514[1493] 1136[718] B[16] 1[5] tY V Palisades. Blvd & Shea Blvd Coppemynd Or &Acorn B O � 7 r 011[ 0[251 2{f9[221] 17012361 Eagle R,,dge Or & Summfi Or S I%SffE Co Per ,kndi]r.00 _ �6. c�J F 4 ti r o la fie•7/00 ✓j LEGEND NORTH XX("- AM(PfA) Peak Hour Traffic Vo9unes R Dlreetlon of Eagre Ridge Drive 8 �m Qa 5ti'ea Blvd. Figure 10: 2023 Background Traffic Volumes CivTech silo 1aylli] m Eagle Ridge Vr& Coppernynd [r --4pq 0 Palisades Blvd & Eagla Few Dr Eagle Ridge Or & Accm A Source: GvTe[h 2017 N 73[101 21[331 30[22] 19f301 120[°?] 48[271 A u'D Cis Palisades Blvd & Eagla Few Dr Eagle Ridge Or & Accm A Source: GvTe[h 2017 N 211 [2331 I M24a] O[t] 1[01 - - Yoo Eagle Ridge Or & Summit Or N { 378[10071 Ln 85[:42] — 593[17231 1313[826] 10[213 1[51 Palisades Bled & Shea Blvd '01101 ` � 0101 5[i4] tq[11]_ Cvppenvynd Dr & Access B Eagle Ridge Oa & 5unmW Or S LEGEND XX(XX) - AM(PM) Peak Nwr Trafic Volumes 1/ Cirection of Eagle Ridge Cmve SITE CnpP'ertiryndG'r® 0 4 A v �a E NORTH ly &4 N� 5#vea Blvd. Figure 11: 202$ Background Traffic Volumes CivTech EJ 1 M _ '[] o[1] ow C4] 7$[ x+32] 111 [S+f 0[1j 1[0] 0 o r c .G Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr N Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Or Eagle Rid ja Dr & Acc:ess A Source: CivTech 2017 Palisades Blvd & Shn Baud I. Cappereuynd Or &Access B Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Or S LEGEND X ((M -AMPM1 PeaN Ham Traffic Vcrurnes Direction of Ea* Ridge Drive *9, SITE a C,a9Perti' MiDl-'9,0 NORTH `d 'V� hp Shea Blvd. Figure 12. 2018TotalTrafficVolumes CivTech Cay," 0 o v v $ r�� NORTH `d 'V� hp Shea Blvd. Figure 12. 2018TotalTrafficVolumes CivTech N' F- tv � 4 5[81 16[51 Eagle Ridge Car & Copperwymd Dr V c �- 44 7411071 2611'9] 21[32] 191301 154[1451 421241 W�77. Paflsades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Di m a u, c' n Eagle Ridge Dr &AocessA Source: CivTech 2017 ix-�7N :;; c .v. 614] 5,�1 (80] a'tol i101 f Ea0e Ridge Dr & 5umrrrit Dr N — iz, iz v77 m iz� 3+;t1[s121 99[1511. 514 [14931 1/3817161 B[1E[ 1[5] pa' Sades Ern: & Shy; 6!':,. 0 201191 Q 0101 5[12] 12131 I'm w [ Copperwynd Dr & Attess B 0 i r O t 0111 0(23] 253[2801 23112°31 $[[ 0111 1(0) Q Eagle Ridge Lir & Summit ❑, S Isle 4J � � t o� LEG EN D NORTH XX(XX)-AM(PM) Peak KourTrafc Volumes * OlreeSw of Eagle RWge Drive m`4 Shea sludi- Figure 13; 2123 Total T,-affic'Volumes C"rvTech A Q J EN � 241 7 h Eagle Ftldge{k & �cxlPer++Smd Dr N i - ti o $1[1ifi]s0[22] 21]33] 19[30] T88[188] 48[27] M m r Palisades BTA 8 Eagle Ridge Dr A c 93[137] r r o s Eagle Ridge dr & AccessA Source: CivTech 2017 Eagle Ridge Dr R Summit 0- h c�c ail � q 42M1t}Ss] — --27[181] 533jt7231 131,3[82S] 10[21] 1]5] a Palisades Bhd S Shea BWd _ f �2 1^328] T ]1o] 14]1T] Ct> arwynd Dr 8 Access B N �M 011] 0[391 294[334] 288®391] Oft[ _ 1M Ea* Ridge Dr S SummM Dr 5 LEGEND XX(XX) -AM(PM) Peaak. Hofer Tref riic Vn fumes a Directran c4 Eagle RMe Drive SITE Ca RpetwYn S]r.00 NORTH Figure 14: 2028 Total Traffic Volumes COPPERWYND Resort an. Club CivTech CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS PEAK HOUR CAPAC►TY ANAL YS►S All intersections have been analyzed using the methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Special Report 2097 and updated 2010 and using 5ynchro software under the HCM 2010 methodology. Results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2018, 2023 and 2028 study years are summarized in Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8, respectively. Analysis worksheets for the future scenarios are in Appendix F, Appendix G and Appendix H, for years 2018, 2023 and 2028 respectively. Table 6; 2018 Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service i CivTe'ch 26 March 2017 Traffic Movement! I AM PM LOS Background Total ID Intersection Control Approach I Eagle Ridge Dr. & Copperwynd Dr. 1 -Way WB Shared A (A) A (A) Sto EB SB Left A(A) A(A) 2 -Way NB Left A (A) A (A) 2 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Cloud Crest stop SB Left A (A) A (A) TR./Summit [drive North (EBIWB) EB Shared A (A) A (A) WB Shared A(A) A A Summit Drive South & Eagle Ridge 2 -Way NB Shared A (A) A (A) S Dr. Stop SB Shared A (A) A (B) NBISB EB Left A A A(A) NB Approach B (D) B (D) SB Approach E (C) E (C) Palisades Blvd. & Eagle Ridge All -Way EB Approach B (B) B (B) Dr./Palomino Blvd. Stop WB Approach B(B) B(B) Overall D (C) D (C) NB Approach D (D) D (E) SB Approach B (B) B (B) 5 Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd. signal EB Approach C (C) C (C) WB Approach C(C) C C Overall CCT_C� C A Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway A 1 -Way SB LeftStop (EB) WB Shared A(A) (A) B Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway B 1 -Way SB Shared i A (A) A (A) Stop (SS) I EB Shared A (A) A(A) i CivTe'ch 26 March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Table 7: 2023 Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service Table 8: 2028 Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service Traffic Movement/ AM PM LOS Background Total ID Intersection Control Approach 1 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Copperwynd Dr. 1 -Way WB Shared B (B) B (B) Stop EB SB Left A(A) A(A) 2 -Way NB Left A (A) A (A) 2 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Cloud Crest Stop SB Left A (A) A (A) TR./Summit Drive North (EB/WB) EB Shared B (B) B (B) WB Shared B(A) B A Summit Drive South & Eagle Ridge 2 -Way NB Shared B (A) B (B) 3 Dr. Stop SB Shared B (B) Bp NBISB EB Left A A A(A) NB Approach C (F) D (F) SB Approach F (D) F (D) 4 Palisades Blvd. & Eagle Ridge All -Way EB Approach C (C) C (C) Dr./Palomino Blvd, Strap WB Approach B B B(C) Overall E (E) F (F) NB Approach D (D) D (D) SB Approach C (B) C (B) 5 Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd. Signal EB Approach C (E) C (E) WB Approach C C C(c) Overall C D C D1 A Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway A 1 -Way Stop (EB) SB Left WB Shared --{--) B (B) -- (--) B (B) B Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway B 1 -Way SB Shared A (A) A (A) Stop (SB) EB Shared A (A) A (A) Table 8: 2028 Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service Civ Tech 27 March 2017 C7 Traffic Movement/ AM PM LOS Back round Total ID Intersection Control 1 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Copperwynd Dr. 1 -Way _Approach WB Shared B (B) B (B) Stop EB SB Left A A A A 2 -Way NB Left A (A) A (A) 2 Eagle Ridge Dr. & Cloud Crest Stop SB Left A (A) A (A) TR./Summit Drive North (EB/WB) EB Shared B (B) B (C) WB Shared B(A) B B Summit Drive South & Eagle Ridge 2 -Way NB Shared B (A) B (B) 3 Dr. Stop SB Shared B (B) C (C) IVBISB EB Left A(A) A(A) NB Approach C (F) E (F) SB Approach F (E) F (F) 4 Palisades Blvd. & Eagle Ridge All -Way EB Approach C (C) C (D) Dr./Palomino Blvd. Stop WB Approach B(C) C(C) Overall E (F) F (F) NB Approach D (E) D (E) SB Approach C {B) D (B) 5 Palisades Blvd_ & Shea Blvd. Signal EB Approach C (F) C (F) WB Approach C C C C Overall C (E) D (E) A Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway A 1 -Way Stop (EB) SB Left WB Shared — (—) B (B) B (B) B Eagle Ridge Dr. & Driveway B 1 -Way SB Shared A (A) A (A) Stop (SB) EB Shared A (A) A (A) Civ Tech 27 March 2017 C7 CopperWynd Resort and Clue} — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Most study intersections are projected to operate at LOS C or better during the peak hours of all horizon years. Two of the intersections are expected to operate at LOS E or F during one or more peak hour in 2423 and/or 2028. The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS E during the 2428 PM peak hour. This is due to the relatively high eastbound left turn movement where dual turn lanes facilitate a projected PM peak hour volume of 1,435 vehicles. Further analysis reveals that if the maximum green interval for the movement was increased to similar to the maximum green interval of the eastbound through movement, the intersection could operate at LOS C during the 2028 PM peak hour. Actual growth may be less than projected as a 2.9 percent growth rate over a decade may be less likely given the limited area remaining for development in Fountain Hills. It is still recommended to ensure that the maximum green time is increased as future traffic volumes increase to ensure adequate operation. The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge DrivelPalomino Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS E or F in the 2023 and 2028 background and total conditions. This is mostly due to the relatively large through volume on Palisades Boulevard in relation to the increasing volume entering/exiting Eagle Ridge Drive. Signalization would mitigate the proposed delay associated with an all -way stop condition. The Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 2014) indicated that a the four -lour signal warrant is expected to be satisfied with the neighboring Adero Canyon development and trailhead at 17 percent of occupancy of planned townhomes and satisfying the eight-hour signal warrant at 29 percent occupancy. Depending on the timing of the build out of surrounding developments and growth of background traffic volumes, a traffic signal may be warranted at full build -out of Phase 2 or Phase 3. Per the Town of Fountain Hills, a northbound left -turn lane on Palisades Boulevard shall be installed along with box and conduit to prepare for a future traffic signal. These improvements are recommended to be constructed prior to Phase 3 of the development. Per the Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 2014), "CivTech is concerned that there may not be sufficient sight distance for drivers intending to turn right on red from the side streets to see approaching vehicles on Palisades Boulevard or for drivers intending to turn left from Palisades Boulevard to see opposing vehicles. Therefore, if and when a traffic signal is installed, we recommend prohibiting right turns on red for the east- and westbound approaches and we recommend protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard." Due to the sight distance restrictions, it is recommended to prohibit right turns on red for the eastbound and westbound approaches and provide protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard. A formal assessment should be conducted during the traffic signal design process. CivTech 28 March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Tattle 9 summarizes the level -of -service with a traffic signal at the Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge DrivelPalomino Boulevard intersection. Table 9: Projected Peak Hour Levels of Service with a Traffic Signal rz—_;ntersection 'traffic Movementl AM(PM LGSM 2023 2028 ControlO) Approach NB Approach B (B) C (B) Palisades Blvd. & Eagle Traffic Signal SB Approach C (B) C (B) 4 Ridge Dr.lPalornino (N$ left EB Approach C (C) C (B) Blvd. installed) WB Approach C (B) C: B) Overall 19.3s. B (14.7s: B) 28.3s: C (16.1s: B) NB Approach B (B) C (B) Palisades Blvd. & Eagle Traffic Signal (IVB left and SB Approach B (B) C (B) 4 Ridge Dr./Palomino EB right EB Approach C (C) C (B) Blvd. WB A roach B (B) C B installed) Overall 17.1s: B (14.4s: B) 23.8: C (14,4s: B) I he level-ot-service (LCIS) was calculated with right turns on red prohibited for the eastbound and westbound approaches and protected -only left turn phasing in the northbound and southbound directions. For year 2023, a 60 -second cycle was utilized. For year 2028, a 65 -second cycle was utilized for the AM peak hour and a 60 -second cycle was utilized for the PM peak hour. With the installation of a traffic signal, the intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive will operate at a level -of -service "B° in year 2023 for both peak hours. For year 2028, the intersection is projected to operate an overall level -of -service "C" during the AM peak hour and "B" during the PM peak hour. Two scenarios were analyzed to determine the impact of installing an eastbound right - turn lane on Eagle Ridge ©rive at Palisades Boulevard. The overall level -of -service would remain the same. However, there would be a few seconds less of overall delay. In year 2928, the eastbound through movement on Eagle Ridge Drive at Palisades Boulevard is projected to be only 21 vph in the AM peak hour and 33 vph in the PM peak hour. The eastbound right -turn volume is projected to be 188 vph in both the AM and PM peak hours. These volumes do not warrant a separate eastbound right --turn lane. Per the analysis, the overall delay would only improve by a few seconds. In addition, right turns on red are recommended to be prohibited in the eastbound and westbound directions due to sight distance. Therefore, a separate right -turn lane is not deemed necessary on Eagle Ridge Drive at Palisades Boulevard. The future lane configurations and traffic controls are depicted in Figure 15, CivTech 29 March 2017 Eagle Ridge Dr& CDpperwynd Dr Facades BW & Eagle Ridge Dr m0 Eagle Ridge 0r& Acxers -1 Source: CivTerK2rj17 �2] a] Palisades Blvd& Shea BNxJ [B] Eagle PidgeDr & SummiI Dr S LEGEND 5 FFE 0 CoppWy ," �N, 5 ®"f FKoor Tumi, mi.e n, I T.fric stjWSign MIT RTH NO45 T,,. -.Y LftT..[.. 0 Sop r 49 Si 77" Speed Limit49 10, DirecbDn of Eagle Ridge Drwe • - (jk 5heaBWd Figure IS: Future Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls CivTech CopperWynd Resort and club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented in this study. Site Plan and Access Renovations are proposed for the CopperWynd resort and Club in Fountain Hills, Arizona. Redevelopment is proposed in phases and will consist of a total of 300 rooms and an addition of 9,850 square feet of meeting/banquet space at full build- out. A restaurant and fitness/tennis club is currently on-site and will remain with the redevelopment. A conceptual site plan is included in Figure 4. The site plan depicts maintaining the two (2) existing driveways as public entrances. The driveway on Eagle Ridge Drive is the main entrance and is expected to facilitate most of guest enter/exit trips. The secondary driveway to Copperwynd Drive is expected to be used for event days as well as potentially staff though a small amount of guests could be expected. The site plan also depicts an auxiliary driveway on Copperwynd Drive for deliveries. Trip Generation The rates provided for the ITE Trip Generation "Hotel" land use category are inclusive of all the uses on-site in addition to guest rooms. Therefore, separate trip generation was not conducted for the added meeting/banquet space. The peak period for the meeting/banquet space would most likely occur on a Saturday and not during the weekday peak hours. • The club membership will remain the same with the renovations, and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not expected to increase. The existing traffic count includes the trips from the club members and restaurant. Moreover, hotel restaurants and cocktail lounges are included in the "Hotel" rate. The trips associated with 32 of the analyzed 300 guest rooms are already accounted for in the existing traffic counts. This analysis calculates the expected increase in trips due to the 268 additional rooms. The proposed plan at full build -out is expected to generate an additional 1801 trips (104 enter/76 exit) during the AM peak hour and an additional 198 trips (97 enter/161 exit) during the PM peak hour. Level of Service Analysis All existing intersections are evaluated to operate at LCIS D or better during the peak hours. The study intersections are projected to operate at LDS C or better during the peak hours of all horizon years with the exception of Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard and Palisades Boulevard and ,Eagle Ridge DrivefPalomi'no Boulevard. These two intersections are expected to operate at LDS E or F during one or more peals hour in 2023 and/or 2628. 1 Cid/T h 31 March 2017 4;:� CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Shea Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS E during the 2028 Phil peak hour. This is due to the relatively high eastbound left turn movement where dual turn lanes facilitate a projected PM peak hour volume of 1,035 vehicles. Further analysis reveals that if the maximum green interval for the movement was increased to similar to the maximum green interval of the eastbound through movement, the Intersection could operate at LOS C during the 2028 PM peak hour. Actual growth may be less than projected as a 2.9 percent growth rate over a decade may be less likely given the limited area remaining for development in Fountain Hills. It is still recommended to ensure that the maximum green time is increased as future traffic volumes increase to ensure adequate operation. Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridqe DrivelPalomino Boulevard .- The intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge DrivelPalomino Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LCIS E or F in the 2023 and 2028 background and total conditions. This is mostly due to the relatively large through volume on Palisades Boulevard in relation to the increasing volume entering/exiting Eagle Ridge Drive. Signalization would mitigate the proposed delay associated with an all - way step condition. The Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 20114) indicated that a the four-hour signal warrant is expected to be satisfied with the neighboring Adero Canyon development and trailhead at 17 percent of occupancy of planned townhomes and satisfying the eight-hour signal warrant at 29 percent occupancy. Depending on the timing of the build out of surrounding developments and growth of background traffic volumes, a traffic signal may be warranted at full build -out of Phase 2 or Phase 3. Per the Town of Fountain Hills, a northbound left -turn lane on Palisades Boulevard shall be installed along with box and conduit to prepare for a future traffic signal. These improvements are recommended to be constructed prior to Phase 3 of the development. Per the Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 20]14), "CivTech is concerned that there may not be sufficient sight distance for drivers intending to turn right on red from the side streets to see approaching vehicles on Palisades Boulevard or for drivers intending to turn left from Palisades Boulevard to see opposing vehicles. Therefore, if and when a traffic signal is installed, we recommend prohibiting right turns on red for the east- and westbound approaches and we recommend protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard." Due to the sight distance restrictions, it is recommended to prohibit right turns on red for the eastbound and westbound approaches and provide protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard. A formal assessment should be conducted during the traffic signal design process. CIVTech 32 March 2417 1� CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hifls, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF REFERENCES A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2011. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highways Administration, Washington, D.C., 2009. NPTS Urban Travel Patterns Report: December 1999. Trip Generation Manual, 9111 Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C, 2012. Trip Generation Handbook, V Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2014. C i v T e ch 33 March 2017 CopperWynd Resort and Club — Fountain Hills, Arizona Traffic Impact Analysis TECHNICAL APPENDIX APPENDIX A: REVIEW COMMENTS RESPONSES (RESERVED) APPENDIX B: EXISTING; TRAFFIC COUNTS APPENDIX C: EXISTING PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX D: TRIP GENERATION APPENDIX E: APPENDIX F: APPENDIX G: APPENDIX H: SELECTED EXCERPTS FROM PALISADES BOULEVARD AND EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE INTERSECTING NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2018 PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS 2023 PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS 2028 PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS �j C i v T e c h 34 March 2017 APPENDIX A REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES (RESERVED) C i v T e c h CopperWynsd Resort - Parking Study Civaech, Inc. Review Comments & Responses 1st Submittal Disposition Codes: (1) Will Cormply (2) Will Evaluate (3) Delete Comment (4) Defer to Cons ultanVOwner Reviewer /Name, Agency_ Town of Fountain Hills -February 22, 2017 item Review Comment Model & Resoonse Page 1 (,&throughout the report) -Add to the trip genera#ion, the traffic the : Convention Center -8,850 SF, Community Members' incre usage of the increased/expanded facilities, function lawn events, restaurant. :Per the hotel, The club membership will remarry the same with the :renovations, and the restaurant patrons from off-site are not iexpected to increase. The existing traffic count includes the trips from ,the club members and restaurant. Due to Town concern, the trip generation is now calculated with rafes for ITE LUC 3!U (Hotel), :which are higher than ITE LUC 330 (Resort Hotel). ITE Land Use =Category (LUC) 310 for a hotel has the following descriptiam "Hotels for`=_are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and ased supporting facilities such as restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and and banquet rooms or convention facilities, limited recreational facilities ;(pool, fitness room), and/or other retail and service shops." The rates ;provided for the "Hotel' land use category are inclusive of ail the uses ,on in addition to guest rooms. Therefore, separate trip generation was not conducted for the added meeting/banquet space. The peak pedod for the meeting/banquet space would most likely occur on a Saturday and not during the weekday peals hours. The function lawn :events are expected to be ancilliary to the indoor meeting/banquet ;space and not separate. Page 1 - A portion of Eagle Ridge Drive (ERD) lies within the City °f 'Documents have been submitted to the City of Scottsdale`s planning Scottsdale. Also submit this report to Scottsdale & incorporate review comments. CivTech Appendix A Page 1 of 4 CopperWynd Resort s Parking Study Ci+vTech, Inc. Review Comments & Responses 1st Submittal D[sposition Godes: (1) Will Comply (2) Will Evaluate (3) Delete Comment (4) Defer la ConsultarVOwrner 3. Review Reviewer !~lame, Agency: Town of Fountain Hills-February22, 2017 & Resoonse =This text has been added to report "Depending on the timing of the €build out of surrounding developments and growth of background Page 2 - Delete the 2nd bullet point, and replace with verbiage to traffic volumes, a traffic signal may be warranted at full build -out of "Con structlparticipate in intersection imp r€vementsfsigna]ization of the Phase 2 or Phase 3. Per the Town of Fountain Hills, a northbound left Palisades Blvd//Eagle Ridge Drive intersection.„ iturn lane on Palisades Boulevard shall be installed along with traffic 'signal conduit and pull boxes to prepare for a future traffic signal. ,These improvements are recommended to be constructed prior to 'Phase 3 of the development." 4. ;figure 2 (& throughout the report): Eagle Ridge Drive's direction switches Labels added. in these diagrams, So, clarify/label street names in all diagrams/figures. 5. Page.12, 3rd Para . "of the school.... 6. ;Table 4 -Add the traffic generators noted above. 7. :Page 14, "3rd Para-" growth factors. of 1.01, 1.062, 1.116..." -Since the next indicates that a growth factor of 2.9% per year was used, how do `these numbers relate? M _.............. ............... ....... _.......... ......... Figure 14, The site generates up to 41 % of the largest side street movements (NB-1NB LT and EB -S8 RT movements) at the Palisades/ERD intersection. So, participate in intersection improvements1signalization improvements. 1. CiuTech Appendix A Typo corrected. Refer to Item 1. corrected_ 2.9% per year was utilized in analysis. Refer to Itern 3. Page 2 of 4 CopperWynd Resort - Parking Study CiuTechr Inc. Review Comments & Responses 1st Submittal Disposition Cedes: (t) Will Comply (2)Will Evaluate (3) Delete Comment (4) Defer to ConsultantfOwner Reviewer Name, Agency_ Town of Fountain Hills -February 2.2, 2017 Review Comment g. :Evaluate the line of sight for EB -SB RT on red at the future traffic signal at PalisadesfEagle Ridge. 1A fieid check of sight distance at this intersection was not conducted :for this project_ However, per the Palisades Boulevard and Eagle :Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment (CivTech April 16, 2014), "CivTech is concerned that there may not be sufficient sight distance ;for drivers intending to turn right on red from the side streets to see :approaching vehicles on Palisades Boulevard or for drivers intending to turn left from Palisades Boulevard to see opposing; vehicles. :Therefore, if and when a traffic signal is installed, we recommend :prohibiting right turns on red for the east- and westbound approaches :and we recommend protected -only left tum phasing for the left turns in both directions from Palisades Boulevard." Due to the sight distance .rE',Wctions, it is recommended to prohibit right turns on red for the ,eastbound and westbound approaches and provide protected -only left turn phasing for the left turns iri both directions from Palisades Boulevard. A formal assessment should be conducted during the 'Signal Design process. 10. ;Table 7, PalisadesfERD: NB approach -add a left turn pocket, due to LOS( - C (F). All -way Stop, Overall - A traffic signal will be needed. due LOS :Refer to Item 3. A LOS analysis with a traffic signal has been added to E€. Provide an LOS analysis for a traffic signal. the TIA. ........—................. ............. .......................................... .,.,,,,,...... ......... ....... ....... -........ ................. ... ............ 11. ;Page 26, last para"...sign alization is expected to occur at signalization ,expected_"???? C i v T e c h Appendix A ypo corrected. Page 3 of 4 CopperWynd Resort - Parking Study CivTech, Inc. Review Comments & Responses 'tst Submittal Disposition Codes: (1) Will Comply (2)Wil! Evaluate (3) !Delete Comment (4) Defer to ConsultantJOwner Reviewer Name, {agency: Town of Fountain Hills -February 22, 2017 1Itern - Review Comment (Code) & Response In lieu of participation in a future intersection improvement and traffic signalization project at PalisadesfERD, provide: Phase 1- Add a NB -WB LT pocket on Palisades at Eagle Ridge Dr. (eliminating the former B- SB acceleration lane width.) Phase 1 -Add a EB -SB RT pocket on Eagle Ridge Drive at Palisades (by narrowing the median and restriping the approach traffic lanes, without a striped bike lane). Phase 2 (or equivalent participation in the Town's future traffic signal project, whichever occurs first) -Construct traffic signal conduit and pull boxes at all approaches to the PalisadeslERD intersection. 13. lFigure.15-Show the future Traffic Signal at Palisades/Eagle Ridge Dave ,. .. ......... t4, ;Page 28, 2nd bullet fsoint - Cappennrynd Drive i` --a--s priva#.e street.. €belonging to (ethers?). Provide adequate evidence of your legal =right t4 make this increase in traffic loading onto this street. ............... ........... .................. ........................................ ............-.... ........................ 18. A large portion of .members walk..." large %? 25% in table. CivTech Appendix A Refer to Item 3. Adding turn lanes with the all -way stop condition would only minimally improve the LOS. The northbound and southbound through movrnerits dictate the low level -of -service, which is mitiagated with a traffic signal. Two scenarios were analyzed to determine the impact of installing .an eastbound right -tarn lane with a Traffic Signal on Eagle Ridge Drive at Palisades Boulevard. The overall level -of -service would remain the same. However, there would be a few seconds less of overall delay. In year 2028, the eastbound through movement on Eagle Ridge Drive at Palisades Boulevard is projected to be only 21 vph in the AM peak hoar and 33 vph in the PM peak hour. The eastbound right -turn volume is projected to be 188 vpwh in bath the Alin and PM peak hours. These volumes do not warrant a separate eastbound right -tum lane. Per the analysis, the overall delay would only improve by a few seconds. In addition, right turns on red are recommended to be prohibited in the eastbound and westbound directions due to sight distance. Therefore, a separate right -turn lane is not deemed necessary on Eagle Ridge Drive at Palisades Boulevard. ....................................W.....,.._......._......-.............. affic 'Signal was shown with first submittal on the intersection il. The map on the side doesn't show intersection control, but .r the intersection IDs. 11 Drive is owned by the primary entity, Palisades Resorts, R ..............-.- ............................ ........... ........................... ..................................................... ,.,,.,..- ie table isn't representative of all members, only those in attendance at day. The hotel commented that many walk. The word 'large' has ;en removed. Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX B EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS [, CiwTech Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: chELD DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. 520.316.6745 Project #: 17-1035-001 TMC SUMMARY OF Eagle Ridge Ur. & Coppen4 nd Dr_. APPROACH LANES C M aF :2 o L n r+� d C f O M 't1' W Cnpperwynd Dr. ` Q �' M Cnpperwynd Dr. AM MD PM _ TOTAL Ln LU TOTAL AM MD PM (1 , 0 0 0 WrmsOL �I .4 7 11 S+ 0 0 0 Y-WayS[op 0 0 aaaa�U 0 fl � we �� 7 12 19 n x z N Mj LOCATION #: 17-1035.0101 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT C b CO Ea I9 a Ridge Dr. & Cupperwynd Or. (Intersection Name) o a N i � CI � THURSDAY 02j02117 cL Day Date I APPRC]ACH LANES COUNT PEri1C3RS 1 W AM 700AM 100AM NOON PM 40OPM 700PM AM PEAK HOUR 745 AM NOON PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 530 PM Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: FIELD DATA SERVICES or ARIZONA. INC. 520,3 t 6.6745 Project #; 17-1035-002 TMC SUMMARY Of Earrle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest TrlSummit Dr N APPROACH LANES CLILIL N 01 - I �ft o ry d 0 V- Cloud Crest Tr/Summit Dr N Cloud Crest Tr/summit Or N AM MD PM TOTAL TOTAL AM MD PM 8 S 3 conrceoc 0 0 0 � 2 -Way swp 0 Com] 0 4 EB s ws a n x M rr }LJj LI IJP, LOCATION #: 17-1035.1102 0 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT e Ridge Dr. & Clout! Crest Tr/summit a ,Q (Intersection Name) d FIF Cn v THURSDAY 02/02J17 a Day Date m APPROACH APPROACH LANES °i R Peiaos W AM 70DAM - 100AM NOON PM 40OPM - 70OPM AM PEAK HOUR 815 AM NOON PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 415 PM Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: FIELD DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. 520.316.6745 Project #: 17-1435-003 TMC SUMMARY OF Summit Dr. 5 ,& Ea Ie Ridge Dr. APPROACH LANES LIHL NN LJ q N i+ Q rn E F-- E a 4 ti V1 E c Q o 2 Eagle Ridge Dr. Eagle Ridge Dr. AM MD PM TOTAL N TOTAL AM MD PM i I W 1 1 CONTROL 2121 v 114 56 64 E:::::::> ;!-Way St" 72 47 114 q 1 fl 1�1 Ne&sa � I 0 1 P1 x rn rn LOCATION #: 17-1035-603 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT c Summit Dr. 5 & Eagle Ridge Dr. (Intersection Name) Q M Q c+1 r q THURSDAY 02/02/17 i' Day [late APPROACH LANES COUNT PERIODS AM 700AM - 100AM NOON PM 40OPM - 70OPM AM PEAK HOUR 815 AM NOON PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 400 PM Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: �IELo DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. 520.3 4 5.6746 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: *OF ELD DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. 520.316.874.5 Project #: 17-1435-005 128 959 543 1562 1 4 TMC SUMMA Y OF Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd. APPROACH LANES N a Nr ka Ln fn a .73 t• m f Shea Blvd. r Shea Blvd. AM MO PM TOTALUJ � TOTAL AM MD PM 934 258 676 rOWME)L 53 n 1691 x#33 1258 f 9lgnalized ° 22 7 _� 15 - Q n z rn Ln m � ri rA LOCATION #: 17-1035-005 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT a r r4 Palisades Blvd. & Shea Blvd.. (intersection Name) ©IFIF rm rn M Ln � r THURSDAY aa�azly nay pate a APPROACH L4 EES wCOUNT P'6RIODS IL AM 70DAM 100ANI LOON PM 40OPM - 700PM AM PEAK HOUR 700 Aha NOON PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 4301 PM 75 128 959 543 1562 1 4 5 51 ELD DATA SERVICES OF AFLizaNA., INC. veracitytratfiegratap 520.316.6745 N -S STREET: E FPJge G:. DATE: 42f02717 LOCATION: FOL Aaln Hies E-WSTREEf: C:p}tr. rwmd0r. DAY: TWRSDAY PRO=* 17-1035•❑ I NORTWBOUND SOUTHBOUND FASSDUND WESTBOUND PEAK HR. FACTOR: ,3.7n �,s�6 o.00 a.M-A 0.313 oNapi L: l: GPS. 33.W32 I11.762M HOURS: i i F1G17M: Tol xar k;t 100 AAF PML -40p -l- TCO PM FFELD DATA 'S'ERVIcES'OF ARIZONA, IffC- VIveracitytrafflegroup 520.31 6.6745 N -S STREET: Emk $11doe L, DATE 02;+02/17 WCM.TION` FiXotAr, Wlls j E -W STREET: CopNrwpW Dr. DAY: THURSDAY PRO}ECTO 17-1035-0I HL NT NR SL 57 SR a ET ER Wt Wr WR TOTAL LANES: p 1 h � 1 4 0 G C a 1 a 0 6:00 AM 0 1-0 PM 6:15 AM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 6:381 AM 1:45 PM 6.45 AM 200 PM 7.-WAft 0 17 1 0 7 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 2S 7:15 AM 0 9 O 0 7 a 0 0 0 a 0 D 16 7:34 AM 0 1 1 0 2 7 0 ❑ a 1 0 0 12 7:43 AM 0 14 4 1 8 0 G 0 a 1 0 2 30 9`04 AM 0 22 3 1 5 0 0 0 4 4 0 1 36 &IS AM 0 1B 1 11 6 0 0 6 0 1 0 1 27 8.36 AM 0 15 0 1 7 a 0 ❑ 4 1 0 0 24 4A5 AM 0 16 4 0 6 a 0 0 4 3 0 0 28 4:04 AM 0 14 1 1 if, 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 34 91SAM 0 13 1 1 6 0 0 0 a 1 0 0 22 9:34 AM 0 it 4 0 5 0 a 0 0 3 0 0 23 91:95 A44 0 11 1 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25- 91:00 AH a 2 2B 5:45 PM a to 3 2 13 a 0 0 0 2 a 14:15 A14 32 8:09 PM a a 2 1 8 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 23 10:30 AM 0 9 4 0 9 a 0 C a 1 0 1 24 6:30 PM 0 6 1 10.45 AM a 0 C a 3 0 1 22 6.45 PH 0 5 2 0 7 0 Il.m A14 r_. .9 2 0 2 IB [TOTAL A INT I NR Sl5T SR I 0. I ET I 11:15 AM I WL I WT I WR TOTAL +hohrrrSBs 0 64 30 6 130 0 035 35 11:30 AM 15 264 AWM&:h % 0.00 73.68 26,32 5.D0 95.00 4.4 8mm::tto;z: q90# 70.4 0.0 :30 00 11:45 AM 99 1 120 143 0 { 36 -W I 0 PM Peak Hr Begins at 530 PM TOTAL NL 1T I MR 5L I ST I SR EL I Er I ER I WL I WT I WR I TOTAL Yalwnes 0 166 216 87 0 0 0 0 16 0 4 302 App--Xb w 0.00 W99 11.11 6.45 +93.55 0.0 a0# A99 �7: # 1A,00 0.00 20.0C: 0.00 App1'Depart LIN 172 1 93 1 103 1 a 1 27 1 20 I 0 AM Peak FLr Begins at 745 AN '_717 O.m 0.316 D.83'6 PERIL I-ftrRap (M) ..... COMMENT L 0 I GPS: 33.60329 -111.762&90 117 AppMach 90 0.00 89.61 ]:0.34 1034 M-56 0.001 ¢#9 "49 # 4xx a:44PI 63.64 0.00 3& PEAK HR. FACTOR: ,3.7n �,s�6 o.00 a.M-A 0.313 oNapi L: l: GPS. 33.W32 I11.762M HOURS: i i F1G17M: Tol xar k;t 100 AAF PML -40p -l- TCO PM FFELD DATA 'S'ERVIcES'OF ARIZONA, IffC- VIveracitytrafflegroup 520.31 6.6745 N -S STREET: Emk $11doe L, DATE 02;+02/17 WCM.TION` FiXotAr, Wlls j E -W STREET: CopNrwpW Dr. DAY: THURSDAY PRO}ECTO 17-1035-0I NORTHBOUND SC UTHiOOND EASTBOUND YONTBOUND INL NT NR SL ST SR m ET ESS WL Wr WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 1; 0 1 0 0 0 a 0 1 0 1-0 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 200 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:90 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 0 6 2 1 B 0 a 0 0 2 0 1 24 4:15 PHI 0 6 3 0 9 0 a 0 0 7 0 a 25 4:30 PM 0 4 3 0 15 0 0 0 0 5 4 3 35 4:45 PM 0 10 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 23 5:00 PM 0 8 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 2 a 0 21 5:15 PM a, 2 2 1 6 0 0 e 0 2 0 0 13 5:30 PXf a 5 4 1 9 a 0 C 0 7 a 2 2B 5:45 PM a to 3 2 13 a 0 0 0 2 a 2 32 8:09 PM a a 2 1 8 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 23 6:1S PM 0 9 4 0 9 a 0 C a 1 0 1 24 6:30 PM 0 6 1 0 11 a 0 C a 3 0 1 22 6.45 PH 0 5 2 0 7 0 0 r_. .9 2 0 2 IB [TOTAL A INT I NR Sl5T SR I 0. I ET I OR I WL I WT I WR TOTAL +hohrrrSBs 0 64 30 6 130 0 035 35 0 15 264 AWM&:h % 0.00 73.68 26,32 5.D0 95.00 4.4 8mm::tto;z: q90# 70.4 0.0 :30 00 APWV%art 99 1 120 143 0 { 36 -W I 0 PM Peak Hr Begins at 530 PM PEAK I T 12 107 AWoaM% 0.00 11 2&C,9I 9.30 9x.70 OAO'A*;9 �tlt xaslrl 63,1fi 0.00 36.84'. PEAK W. FACTOR: 0.865 '_717 O.m 0.316 D.83'6 CONTROL- I-ftrRap (M) ..... COMMENT L 0 GPS: 33.60329 -111.762&90 HOURS: FRAM: - AM 704 .L*E 1C{ - 0 jr mwx" 0PR1 k}7 fN4 700 A. 77.EtGDATA SERVICES [7FARlzowk.INC. VeTacitytra"Icgraut7 'T�' 520.34SX745 N-5 STREET., Ea,! Ridge Qr, DATE: 02167117 LOCATION: Ealntai..n I -W E•WMEEF: Cl Kid Crest Tr0SumrnitCWR DRY: THURSDAY PROJECi4 17-1035.002 FIrum Daae SERvicEs aF AR1zaKA, ENC.veraeityltraffieg rou,,, or 6420.316.147.15 N-5 STREET: Eagle RldgE Dr, CATS: 021WJII LOCATION: Fountw Hllli 4 E -W STREET_ Clod CreS[TrlSummtVr N DRAY: THULSDAY PROJECTS 17-3935-•02 NORTHBOUND 50UTHBCUNb EASTBOUND WE.STBCURD NO"+OXND 5CMJTHBGUND EAS713OUnD WESFBOlui16 U ER NL Wr NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR. TOTAL LAAO - i. 0 1 l 0 4 1 0 C. l .. 6:00 AM 1:15 PM 6:15 AM 1.30 PM 6:30 AM 1:45 PM 6;95 AM 2100 PM 7:013 AM 0 17 a 0 6 1 0 a 0 a a 26 7AS AM E L2 0 0 8 a 2 0 P 4 0 2. 25 7:301 AM D 10 0 a 3 a 1. D 4 0 a 1 15 7:45 AM I 15 1 1 10 a 0 0 1 a a 1. 3D 8:00 AM 0 25 a a 7 0 1 D 0 a a 0 33 8:.15 AM 2 19 a 0 8 a 1. 0 0 0 1 2 33 8:30 AM 1 14 d a 6: 0 3 0 0 1 a 0 25 8:45 AM 0 21 1 a 7 0 1 0 0 a 0 0 30 9:aO AM 1 15 0 1 19 0 D 4 a a 0 2 39 9: 15 AM 4 12 6 a 6 0 1 a a 0 a 1 20 9:30 AM 0 15 0 0 8 i 1 0 a 0 0 1 26 91,45 Am 1 13 3 a 13 0 1 a 0 0 0 3 34 10:00 AM 0 0 2 28 5:15 PM 2 4 3 1 6 0 2 a 10: LS AM 0 0 a 19 5:30 PM 0 B 1 1 21 a a 0 16:30 AM 0 a 13 31 5:45 PM 0 17 t 0 12 a 0 a 10:45 AM 0 a 1 32 6:00 PM a 9 1 1 9 a 1 0 ll:DD AM a a a 21 6:15PM 1 12 a 0 9 a 0 0 11:15 AM a a 0 22 6:30 PM 0 7 a 1 22 0 0 0 11:30 AM a 0 a 21 6:45 PM 0 7 1 2 6 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 a 1 17 IT©TA1 I NL I HT NR I SL I ST SR EL I ET I TOTAL RL I NT I NR I Si sT I Dt I EL I 'ET i ER I WL I wr WR TDTAL Volumes 7 189 5 2 101 2 22 0 1 1 1 15 336 Approach a.4 3.4P 49.43 2. 1.90 96.19 L90 92-31 0.00 7.69 5.88 5.86 88.24 1 AWDepart. 1 201 1 216 1 1G5 1 103 1 L3 t 7 1 17 1 in AM Peak Hr Begins at 815 AM PEAR 1 53 PEAK 111 Approach % 6.00 92.00 2.4a1 0AO 96.3 8 3.641100.00 O.Da, 0,401 s 4 70 1 I T00,W1 1 PEAK HR. 127 f Approach % 5.33 9333 1.331 2.44 97.56 D.W1100.00 FACTOR.: 0.00 0.00. 16.67 16,67 61671 PEAK HR. 0.375 CONTROL 2 -Way Stop rEB & WB} FALTQR: 0.852 1 13513 1 COMMENT 1: '1417 a.5_ti1 0.81+ CONTROL: 2 -War ila'p tM& WB} GPS: 33.5S4650, -111.761067 COMMENT 1: HOLMS: I FROM: iT13: GPS: 33.599E50.-II1.7filk£! A7d 70AM tae AM HOUR$: 1 1 FROM: 1 To, NOON ff 16 a 10 AN I 7138 JAM 1iJ N+I PH 1 400 IP44 1 701E IPM NOON PHI I vie PFI I FIrum Daae SERvicEs aF AR1zaKA, ENC.veraeityltraffieg rou,,, or 6420.316.147.15 N-5 STREET: Eagle RldgE Dr, CATS: 021WJII LOCATION: Fountw Hllli 4 E -W STREET_ Clod CreS[TrlSummtVr N DRAY: THULSDAY PROJECTS 17-3935-•02 NORTHBOUND 50UTHBCUNb EASTBOUND WE.STBCURD RL NT NR SL ST SR. EL U ER WL WT ROA TMAL LANES: 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1.30 PM 1:45 PM 2100 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PH 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 1 4 1 a 11 4 0 0 0 a .a 4 22 4:15 PM 2 to 0 0 15 2 0 a 0 0 0 0 29 4.3D PM 1 u 0 0 20 0 1 a 0 0 P 0 33. 4.45 PM. a 13 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 a 0 1 21 5 -.DD PM 0 U L .0 12 a 1 0 0 0 0 2 28 5:15 PM 2 4 3 1 6 0 2 a 1 0 0 a 19 5:30 PM 0 B 1 1 21 a a 0 0 0 a 13 31 5:45 PM 0 17 t 0 12 a 0 a 1 0 a 1 32 6:00 PM a 9 1 1 9 a 1 0 0 a a a 21 6:15PM 1 12 a 0 9 a 0 0 0 a a 0 22 6:30 PM 0 7 a 1 22 0 0 0 1 a 0 a 21 6:45 PM 0 7 1 2 6 0 0 0 7 0 a 1 17 IT©TA1 I NL I HT NR I SL I ST SR EL I ET I iTt I WL I WFVY9k TQTAL Volumes 7 114 9 6 139 2 6 0 3 0 0 5 296 AP ~% 5-19 88.15 6.6 4.0.9 96.56 2-:16 66.$7 0.00 33.>3 O.Da 0 -Lb !WW AWDepart 435 1 130 1 197 1 142 9 1 is Ic a PM Peak Hr Begins at 415 PM PEAR 1 53 111 Approach % 6.00 92.00 2.4a1 0AO 96.3 8 3.641100.00 O.Da, 0,401 a.a0 O,pO T00,W1 1 PEAK HR. FACTOR.: 0.962 0.688 0.750 0.375 CONTROL 2 -Way Stop rEB & WB} COMMENT 1: 0. GPS: 33.5S4650, -111.761067 HOLMS: I FROM: iT13: A7d 70AM tae AM NOON ff 16 a 10 PH 1 400 IP44 1 701E IPM FIELD QA1rA SERVICES 9F A-RlzoNA, INc. vInerackytrafficgrmpp 520.31 5.674.5. N-SSTREE'f: :i.,rnit.Dr-.5 DATE: 0277.+17 LOCATION: rttinCain P&, E -W STREET: Fade Wqe Dr. DAY: THOR50AY PRD]E£T# 17-1035-'303 WSRTHBDIIND SOUTHBOUND EAS BOUND WESTBOINVD CO-ROL: 2 ssj COMMENT 1: GPS•: 33.596324,-111.758197 HOURS:. FROM: T9: AM rs AM 1�a I NCh71V PM 10G .-" j I. P -11 FIELD DATA SERvicEs or- AitizaNA, IPic- g-eralcitytrafficgroup 520.31 6.6745 WS STREET: Sim tGr. 5 DATE: 041A )17 LOCATIOM Fountain P45 a E -W STiiJE a Rklue Dr. DAY: `HJR3G-.•' PROIECTA 17.1033-063 0 NDIRTHBOUND MU MBOUND E.551'P.GUNG WESTBMED NL NT NR % ST SR EL ET ER WL Wr WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 6:90 AM, 1:15 PM 6:15 AM 1:30 PM 630 AM 1:45 PM 6:45 AM 2:00 PM 7:90 A14 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 6 6 9 0 19 7:15 AM a 0 1 4 0 0 0 10 9 9 11 2 28 720 AM p 0 0 9 9 0 a 4 0 9 9' 0 13 7:45 AM 0 9 0 6 9 0 0 12 D 6 20 a 32 8.00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 a 10 6 9 24 0 37 8:15 AM 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 9 6 9 21 0 33 8:30 AM 0 0 0 6 9. 4 0 11 0 4 15 a 32 BAS AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 11 9 6 22 0 38 990 AM I 0 0 2 0 0 0 19 9 1 14 0 37 9:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 9 9 14 0 23 930 AN 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 10 9 9 34 0 27 9:45 AM 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 7 9 0 IS 1 26 10:00 AM 0 24 0 0 6 4 34 5:34 Pit 0 0 C. 3 4 0 10:15 AM 11 0 6 13 6 33 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 16:30 AM 6 9 19 0 16 6:93 PH 0 0 1 2 0 D 0 7 10:45 AM 2 14 1 27 6:15 PM 0 D 0 1 0 D i 5 6 11:00 AM 10 4 21 6:30 FM D 0 0 9 0 0 0 6 0 9 11:15 AM 2 13 6:45 PM D 0 - '7 D a 0 3 9 1 4 11:30 AM !i1 TOTAL I NL j MT I -NR I SL I Sr I SR 1 EL ET Ek WL kYl' 4rl1 11:45 AM vdumes U 4 225 0 1- 2 136 1 3 113 43 326 [TOTAL NL I NT NR I SL I ST I SR FL I ET I ER I WL I WT I WR TOTAL 4amvs 1 0 3 39 0 p 9 120 0 1 189 3 347 Appmoach Sir 25.00 0.90 75.00 1Mi)o OM 0,00 0,00 E00 -DO 9:07 0.52 47.93 1,35 Apert 4 f 3 34 I 120 153 193 190 AM Peak Hr Begms at 615 AM 152 AppwM % D.DD 0.60 ICOM 94.12 PEAK unws 1100.04 1.52 96.97 16 0..40 69.12 30.83 4Eex MR„ 199 Adppr[eth % 9.90 0.0010099 0A0 0.061 9.00 10050 .000 0 i3F a 63 17,06, PEW lift C.; 17 0.35"- 0.326 CONTROL: 2 -Way SMp. f'M3 S. 586. FACTOR: ` 1).250 1 1.6667 1 0.653 9.830 D.921 �. CO-ROL: 2 ssj COMMENT 1: GPS•: 33.596324,-111.758197 HOURS:. FROM: T9: AM rs AM 1�a I NCh71V PM 10G .-" j I. P -11 FIELD DATA SERvicEs or- AitizaNA, IPic- g-eralcitytrafficgroup 520.31 6.6745 WS STREET: Sim tGr. 5 DATE: 041A )17 LOCATIOM Fountain P45 a E -W STiiJE a Rklue Dr. DAY: `HJR3G-.•' PROIECTA 17.1033-063 0 NDIRTHBOUND MU MBOUND E.551'P.GUNG WESTBMED NL NT MR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL Wr 19R TOTAL LANES: P i C. a 1 a i_ - 1 1 - 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PH 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4' DD PM 0 0 1 6 D 6 9 19 1 0 11 3 41 4:15 PM a 0 0 1 D 1. 9 33 0 0 11 10 36 4:34 PM 0 0 0 5 R 6 1 22 0 D 12 rr 46 4:45 PM 0 0 0 4 9 0 0 10 0 0 13 2 29 546 PF4 0 0 D 3 9 4 0 19 0 D 4 3 2a 5:15 pM 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 24 0 0 6 4 34 5:34 Pit 0 0 C. 3 4 0 0 11 0 6 13 6 33 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 9 9 0 6 6 9 19 0 16 6:93 PH 0 0 1 2 0 D 0 7 0 2 14 1 27 6:15 PM 0 D 0 1 0 D i 5 6 0 10 4 21 6:30 FM D 0 0 9 0 0 0 6 0 9 5 2 13 6:45 PM D 0 - '7 D a 0 3 9 1 4 2 !i1 TOTAL I NL j MT I -NR I SL I Sr I SR 1 EL ET Ek WL kYl' 4rl1 TOTAL vdumes U 4 225 0 1- 2 136 1 3 113 43 326 Approach % 0.09 0013 100. 9615 0-00 3.95 1.44 97.34_ 6.72 1.69 71.97 27.99 APWD-IPM 2 45 M 1 4 139 1 163 1 159 1 119 PM Peak. Hr Begins at 400 PM PEAL 152 AppwM % D.DD 0.60 ICOM 94.12 0.013 5.881 1.52 96.97 1.521 0..40 69.12 30.83 4Eex MR„ FACTOR- 8 0250 0,706 C.; 17 0.35"- 0.326 CONTROL: 2 -Way SMp. f'M3 S. 586. COMMENT L'. 0 GPS: 33.595324 -111.758197 HOURS: i M_1 TO: AH 7013 AM 9411 AM NO6N 0 0 0 ID P41 1 430 IPM I:t7 P14 FIELD DATA SERVICES of ARtzonA, INC. veracitytrafficnrvwi 524-316.6745 N-5 STREET: P45ades 1'J•Ad. DATE: E-2; 0V17 LOCAT1W Fountain Hills EW STREET: Ea* RH-oe Lk, DAY: THURSDAY PRO3C-CTA 17-101"34 AIORTHBCq 7b SDUTHBOIMO EASTBOUND VIEST®01AID FIELD DATA SERVICES or ARIroN►s, INC. "erackytraf'ticgroup 520.31 6-&T45 N-SSTREET. Pallsodes Elvis. DATE:02l02717 LOCATION: Fc,w%:-n 4 E -W PREE - Each R1d9C Dr. DAV: ,HI:RSDAY PROWT# L7-1035_3rA NORTHBOUND SGOV80UND E115YEOUND WESTBOUND CONTROL S�grMiiaed rjDmm NT 1: GPS:33355631,-Il1.755911 >1QUR5: 7CFROM: TO: AM t7 .Gp1 i LCO �e HOON PH 9G7 P1 :C+J PM CONTROL: S9na%¢, 1 C9WENT 1: a GPS- 33:595931 -111.7'16911 HCRJRS: I I OR 1TQ; AM 1 7 I&M 100 dM. NOON 0 0 1 I3 0 PM 9Dj7 JPM I 700 P1', NL NT HR SL ST SR 4 ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL w NT NR 5L Sr SR EL Er ER 'WL WT WA TOTAL LANES- 0 2 1 1 2 8 1 1 0 1 L 4 LANES: 0 2 1 2 v 1 i 0 1 1 C 6.00 AM 1:00 PN 6:15 AM 1:15 PM 690 A24 1:38 PM 6:45 AM 1.45 PM 7:80 AM 15 54 2 1 IM 5 4 0 5 11 p 3 2E3 2.:OO PM 7:15 AM 8 51 8 3 22fi 3 6 0 9 02 1 11 333 21'5 PM 7:30 AM 7 % 2 3 193 3 1 0 3 9 0 2 279 2:30 PM 7:45 A14 17 .B9 1 1 172 5 3 a K 14 0 5 313 2.45 IN 8.00 A29 L2 72 2 L 165 Ll 7 1 7 4 2 4 2139 3,00 PM 8:.15 AM L2 78 2 4 IN 9 a 0 5 12 1 5 285 3J5PM 8:30 AM 8 81 6 3 1% 5 & 0 Ll 9 2 2 279 3:34 PM 8:45 AM 16 68 3 2 116 6 7 1 8 10 D 7 299 3=45 PM 9:00 AM 8 65 3 2 in 9 10 2 YO 9 1 2 299 4:0O PM 9 150 12 3 85 7 5 0 9 5 0 6 291 9:15 AM 12 71 5 3 117 2 4 2 3 1 1 3 274 4:15 PM 6 152 12 3 88 11 3 3 8 4 2 3 305 930 A39 10 75 2 L 136 5 2 0 l0 6 0 1 248 4:30 PM .9 IM 9 1 82 9 4 5 113 7 1 S 309 9:45 AM 48 tis 4 0 in 5 10 0 12 6 1 7 272 4-45 PM 1 165 9 2 62 5 6 3 9 4 0 5 295 10:80 AN 5:80 PM 6 159 10 4 111 4 5 8 9 5 2 1 310 10:15 AM 5:15 PM 4 169 11 9- 82 5 8 2 6 a 2 8 309 1038 AM 530 PM 7 178 6 2 99 4 11 1 a 3 0 2 321 10:95 AM 5145 PM 11 169 10 1 66 5 5 8 10 6 1 1 285 11:00 AM 6:00 PM 6 98 9 3 76 12 6 8 10 6 3 3 232 11115 AM 6:15 PM 5 141 6 1 83 a 1 1 7 6 2 3 261 1130 AM 520 PM 8 332 6 1 59 4 2 3 I8 3 0 1 224 11:95 AM 6:45 PM B 122 4 2 M 0 1 2 9 4 0 2 284 TOTAL I NL j HT I NR I SL I ST j 6R EL I ET I ER. VJL I WT I WR I TOTAL ITOTAL I NL I 'NT I NR. SL I Sf ✓11 EL ET ER I WL I Wi I WR I TOTAL Volumes 135 858 32 24 1x55 613 68 6 93 98 9 52 3299 Volumes 81 1803 104 27 963 70 :SF _ 20 112 61 13 47 3351 Approach G�, 13.17 83.71 3.12 133 95.27 3.49 40.72 3.59 55.69 61.64 5.66 32.70 APproam % 9.07 90.69 5.23 2.55 98„85 660 30.16 10.56 69' 53.51 11.40 35.119 AWDepart I ID25 1 9713 1 1947 1 2046 1 167 j 62 159 f 232 All. 11360 f 1136 189 1 151 1 114 7 164 AM Pwk Hr 6e9ins at 715 AM PM Peak Hr Beow at 445 PM PEAK PEAK AAWcmh % 13 75 84.69 L55I 1 46.14 72 80' 31K 1 2.13 29 35 3 2Z1214 I Approach umes 18 � 670 36 L? 374{ 4.46 1235 61.701 58.33 5.00 36.671 9b 2.99 92.544.971 2.97 9237 44..78 &.96 96.27 50.00 1000 40.O1) PEAK HP, PEkK HR, FFACTOR: D-748 fl.6-08 1r.7a3 I 0.625 0-911 FACTOR: 0.948 0-849 D33a 0.555 0.562 CONTROL S�grMiiaed rjDmm NT 1: GPS:33355631,-Il1.755911 >1QUR5: 7CFROM: TO: AM t7 .Gp1 i LCO �e HOON PH 9G7 P1 :C+J PM CONTROL: S9na%¢, 1 C9WENT 1: a GPS- 33:595931 -111.7'16911 HCRJRS: I I OR 1TQ; AM 1 7 I&M 100 dM. NOON 0 0 1 I3 0 PM 9Dj7 JPM I 700 P1', Ftet,o DATA SF-RVr�cEs OF ARIsZONIA, INC. va<acitytraffictgronp 520.316,6745 N -S STREET: Palimdf - BWDATE: 12,'62+77 LOCATION: Fnunbin K,% E -W STREET: Srssa BWDAY: THiRSCAY PROJECT+ 17-10354005 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND W97077 NR NL N7 NR SL ST SR 0. ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 1 1 2 G 1 I 2 2 3 L &DO AM 3 1 S:DD PM 6:1S AM 1:15 PM 6:30 AM 1:30 PM 6AS AM 1:45 PM 7:01? AM 6 2 0 22 2 208 56 67 1 D 224 10 618 7:15 AM 1 6 6 15 2 234 48 103 3... D 271 to 699 7:30 AM 2 0 2 15 9 187 85 125 2 1 258 17 690 7.45 AM 3 2 4 24 0 164 69 its 1 D 266 16 607 B:ODAM 7 2 4 14 0 162 E9 IDS 2 D 191 14 573 8:15 AM 1 1 3 10 0 17D 77 119 0 2 1167 16 5% 8:30 AM 6 0 0 15 1 147 69 126 2 1 162 13 542 8-45 AM 4 0 3 is 0 117 77 125 1 0 137 18 497 9:00 AM 2 2 3 13 1 138 99 113 3 1 131 14 482 715 AM 1 2 9 15 2 130 72 140 1 3 158 16 549 730 AM 3 2 3 16 3 130 67 137 2 5 1.15 14 547 9:45 AM 2 3 2 SD 1 137 76 L33 .1 1 144 12 525 10.00 AM S:LS PM t0 0 0 10 0 72 168 327 1 2 348 22 760 10:15 AM 4 1 3 t5 2 95 181 249 3 3 133 23 712 SAS PM 10:310 AM 0 13 2 69 136 213 4 1 126 22 59D 6:00 PM 3 0 WAS AM 11 1 99 t43 165 2 4 99 6 535 6:15 PM 2 0 0 1I:OD AM 3 72 140 151 6 2 99 9 49D 5:30 PM 2 2 2 11 11:15 AM 49 114 135 4 0 95 13 428 6:45 PM 1 1 0 4 3 11:30 AM 106 132 4 1 76 7 .355 TOTAL I NIL I HT I NR I SL I Sr 1 SR I 11:45 AM I ET BL WL Wr WRI TDTAL volumes 418 16 I 132 21 994 I 1823 NR 5L EL ET ER W& 'NR WR TOTAL _ 38 22 39 38.36 2L22 3939 Y84 8.68 12. 1924 W 1436 %57 90.75 36.66 612,38 22 096 14 2194 0.59 92.13 172 7;23 6901 99 f 1838 212 02 1651.1 23&0 i 4156 0 1 TOTAL 4cfumes Approach 9b ACP) Depart NL NT AM Peak. Hr ftlm at: 700 AM PEOX Volumes 12 10 12 46 1 35.29 29.41 35.2x1 6.71 71.45 90,841 36.95 62.03 1.001 0.10 94.67 5232618 25B 433 7 1 9S9 1 1 PEAK HR, FACTOR: 0.654 x7,870 0.823 McWi 0.936 CONTROL- SlgnatL" COMPANT 1: GPS: 33.58052}.-1117568_%4 _ "OURS: 1 FROM: TO, AM I 7C11 IAH I 190 IALM PM I 'm IPM p IP" FIE1.Q IATA SERVICES OF AstizoNA, hoc. vC+racixytrafficgrL,a*: 520.316.617+15 N-5 STREET: Pall5ades Bht. MTE 02,1247 LOCATION: Fountam HR.S D EW S1REEr. Shea Blvd, DAY: THURSDAY PR.D7ECFA 17-101"05 NORTHBOUND SOUTti"imp EASTBOUND WES BCONO NL NT HR SL ST SR EL Er ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 G 1 I 2 2 3 L L 3 1 S:DD PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2 -Do PM 2:15 PM 230VM 2:45 PM 3:60 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3^45 PM 411YJ PM 2 0 1 12 2 110 L63 290 7 3 135 15 740 4:15 PM 2 1 5 13 0 91 162 276 5 3 132 10 708 4:30 PM 4 1 1 16 2 86 176 339 5 1 175 14 820 4145 PM 0 1 1 to 3 91 1.51 282 8 1 143 12 703 5100 PM 6 1 1 11 2 112 181 3iC 1 0 137 27 789 S:LS PM t0 0 0 10 0 72 168 327 1 2 348 22 760 5-30 PM 4 1 3 t5 2 95 181 249 3 3 133 23 712 SAS PM 4 0 0 13 2 69 136 213 4 1 126 22 59D 6:00 PM 3 0 2 11 1 99 t43 165 2 4 99 6 535 6:15 PM 2 0 0 6 3 72 140 151 6 2 99 9 49D 5:30 PM 2 2 2 11 1 49 114 135 4 0 95 13 428 6:45 PM 1 1 0 4 3 48 106 132 4 1 76 7 .355 TOTAL I NIL I HT I NR I SL I Sr 1 SR I 0. I ET BL WL Wr WRI TDTAL volumes 418 16 I 132 21 994 I 1823 2671 50 21 1.498 186 1 7664 Aopwm % 62.50 12.50 25.00 1151 1.83 86.66 36.43 60-52 1.05 1.23 87.88 1C.91 Appir 904 64 2017 1147 _ 92 4744 3$19 1705 2532 PM Pea# Hr Selpa at: 430 PM PEAK 603 75 3072 Rppraa+�,. % �1 76.42 11-54 11.541 1133 L69 86.991 34.68 54.55 0.771 D. 88.42 11,W PEAK HR, FACTOR: D.650 , 4.8743 0.937 j D.897 0.937 CONTROL: S ambed COP24ENT 1:. 9 CIPS: 33.507524 -111756524 HCUR5: FROl4: T'U: Avg 7DC AM 30fi� AM "CON 0 0 0 n PM 4M 1r'm 1 71+3 PH FIELD DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. 520.316.6745vveracitytrafficgroup Pedestrian & Bicycle Study N -S STREET: Eagle Ridge Dr. Date: 02/02/17 City: Fountain Hi E -W STREET: Copperwynd Dr. Day: THURSDAY Project #: 17-1035-00 PEDESTRIANS BICYCLES N -LEG S -LEG &LEG W-LE7' N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 7,00 AM 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 a 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7:45AM0 0 0 0 7-45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 815AM 1 a 0 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 aOO AM 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM 0 0 0 9:15 AM 0 0 1 0 915 AM 0 a 0 9:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 9,30 AM 0 0 a 0 9:45 AMI 0 1 0 1 a 1 0 9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 —TOTAL 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIANS BICYCLES N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG 4:00 PM 0 7 0 0 4:00 PM a 0 0 0 4:15 PM 2 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4-45 PM 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5:00 RM ci 0 1 0 0 5:00 Pm 1 0 0 0 5-.15 PM a 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5A5 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 615 PM 0 0 0 1 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 6:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 6.45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 0 0 0 F—TTOTAL I 0 0 0 a North Leg West Leg East Leg 4(FIELD DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA* INC. 520.316.6745 V,xileracitytrafficgri 1-13. Pedestrian & Bicycle Study N -S STREET: Eagle Ridge Dr. Date. 02/02/17 City: Fountain Hi E -W STREET: Cloud Crest Tr/Summit Dr N Day: THURSDAY Project #: 17A035-00 PEDESTRIANS BICYCLES N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 0 a 0 0 7,15 AM 0 b 0 0 7:15 AM a 0 0 01 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7.45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 7-45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0- 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 8:30 AM 1 0 0 0 830 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 915 AM 0 a 0 0 9:30 AM 0 0 00 9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 9!45 AM 0 0 0 0 9:45 AM a 0 0 0 0 TOTAL -0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIANS BICYCLES N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 a 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM a a 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PIVI 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 Pm 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 1 0 Q 0 6:15 PM 0 6:30 PM 0 0 a 0 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 - North Leg West Leg East Leg 41-11. 4. FIELD DATA SERVICES 4F ARIZONA, INC. 4r, a20.316.6745VItteracitytrafficgroup Pedestrian & Bicycle Study N -S STREET: Summit Dr. S Date: 02/02/17 City: Fountain Hi E -W STREET: Eagle Ridge Dr. Day: THURSDAY Project #: 17-1035-00 PEDESTRIANS BICYCLES N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG 7.00 AM 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 8= AM a 0 0 0 1 8:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 830 AM 0 0 0 0 8-30 AM 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM a 0 0 a 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9.00 AM 0 0 0 0 9:15 AMI 0 1 0 1 0 0 9:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 9:30 AMI 0 1 0 1 0 0 9:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 9:45 AMI 0 1 a 1 0 1 0 9:45 AMI 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4.-15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 1 0 0 2 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 a 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 5:00 Pm 0 0 a D 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM a 0 0 a 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 a 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 0 a 0 0 6:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6.45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 TOTALI 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 TOTALI 0_1 0 0 1 0 North Leg West Leg East Leg *L-01 FIELoDATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. 520-316.6745 Vverackytraff ic-, Pedestrian & Bicycle Study N -S STREET: Palisades Blvd. Date: 02102117 City; Fountain K E -W STREET: Eagle Ridge Dr. Day: THURSDAY Project #: 17-1035-00 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 1 0 1 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 4A5 PM 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM -0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5.15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM a a 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM a 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM0 0 a 0 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 TOTAL� 1 -0 1 1 Q TOTAL a 1 0 1 1 0 North Leg West Leg East Leg N -LEG 5 -LEG E -LEG VV -LEG N -LEG S -LEG E -LEG W -LEG 7:00 AM 0 0 2 a 7:00 AM 715 AM 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 a 0 730 AM 0 0 0 a 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7A5 AM 1 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 a 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 815AM 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 1 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9!00 AM 0 0 0 0 9-15 AMI a 0 0 0 9:15 AM] 9:30 AMI 0 1 0 1 0 1 D I 0 a 0 0 930 AM] 0 0 0 0 9:45 AMI 0 1 0 0 0 9A5 AMI 0 1 0 1 0 1 (1 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 1 0 1 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 4A5 PM 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM -0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5.15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM a a 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM a 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM0 0 a 0 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 TOTAL� 1 -0 1 1 Q TOTAL a 1 0 1 1 0 North Leg West Leg East Leg 4. FIEU) DATA SERVICES OF ARIZONA, INC. Ir" 520-316.6745vveracitytrafficgroup Pedestrian & Bicycle Study N -S STREET: Palisades Blvd. Date: 02/02/17 City: Fountain Hi E -W STREET: Shea Blvd, Day: THURSDAY Project #F: 17-1035-00 7:00 AM N -LEG 0 S -LEG 0 E -LEG 0 W -LEG 0 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 830 AM 8A5 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9.45 Am N -LEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 S -LEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E -LEG 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 W -LEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM a 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 -0 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 8.30 AM 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 D 0 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 9:15 AM a 1 0 0 1 0 9:30 AM 1 0 1 1- 0 1 0 9:45 AM] 0 1 0 a 1 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 4'00 PM 0 0 0 0 4.15 PM 0 0 0 0 4--15 PM 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM a a 0 a 4:30 PM 0 0 0 a 4:45 PM 0 0 0 a 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 a 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5.45 PM a 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 630 PM 0 0 0 0 6:30 RM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 TOTALI 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 TOTALI 0 L 0 1 0 0 North Leg West Leg East Leg Prepared by: Field Data Services of ArizonaNeracity Traffic Group (520) 396-6745 Volumes for: Thursday, February 02, 2017 City: Fountain Hills Project #: 17-1035-006 Location: Copperwynd Driveway east of Eagle Ridge Dr. ,M Period N B EB W6 PM._Period NS S6 EB WB 00:00 1 200 453 3 367 669 GPS Coordinates: 12:00 11 Daily Totals 11 00:15 0 WS Combined 2 12:15 7 13 PM 00:30 0 55.8% 0 35.1% 54.9% 59.6% 12:30 9 09:45 08:15 9 15:45 12:15 Volume 00:45 0 1 1 6 7 12:45 14 37 8 41 78 01:00 0 0 1100 12 12 01:15 0 0 13:15 7 10 01:30 0 0 13:30 5 8 01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 5 32 10 40 72 02:00 0 0 14:00 10 8 02:15 0 0 14:15 4 8 02:30 0 0 14:30 6 11 02:45 1 1 1 1 2 14:45 5 25 14 41 66 03:QO 0 0 15:00 4 8 03:15 0 0 15:15 8 10 03:30 0 0 15:30 8 11 03:45 1 1 1 1 2 15:45 7 27 12 41 68 04:00 0 0 16;00 6 9 04:15 1 0 16:15 6 11 04:30 2 2 16:30 12 13 04:45 0 3 0 2 5 16:45 10 34 9 42 76 05:00 1 1 17:00 10 8 05:15 4 1 17:15 4 8 05:30 2 2 17:30 6 8 05:45 6 13 2 6 19 17:45 11 31 13 37 68 06:00 5 4 18:00 8 10 06:15 8 6 18:15 12 9 06:30 3 3 18:30 8 7 06.45 7 23 5 18 41 18:45 13 41 8 34 75 07:00 12 6 19:00 14 9 07:15 8 5 19:15 6 7 07:30 7 2 19:30 5 5 07.45 13 40 7 20 60 19:45 3 28 8 29 57 08:00 15 5 20:00 6 6 08:15 16 5 20:15 3 11 08:30 13 6 20:30 5 9 08:45 15 59 6 22 81 20:45 4 18 7 33 51 09:00 14 13 21:00 7 3 09:15 13 7 21:15 6 6 09:30 11 5 21:30 3 4 09:45 11 49 13 38 87 21:45 6 22 6 19 41 10:00 6 13 22:00 3 3 10:15 9 15 22:15 0 2 10:30 6 10 22:30 2 1 10:45 6 27 8 46 73 22:45 0 5 0 6 11 11:00 11 1s 23:00 1 2 11:15 7 6 23:15 0 0 11:30 10 11 23:30 1 0 11:45 8 36 8 40 76 23:45 0 2 2 4 6 Total Vol. 253 200 453 302 367 669 GPS Coordinates: Daily Totals NB SB EB WS Combined 555 567 1122 AM PM Split 0/0 55.8% 44:2°/A 40.4010 35.1% 54.9% 59.6% Peak Hour 08:00 09:45 08:15 18:15 15:45 12:15 Volume 59 51 88 47 45 80 P.H.F. 0.92 0.85 U.81 0.84 0.87 0.83 Prepared by: Field Data Services of ArizonaNeracity Traffic Group (520) 316-+6745 Volumes for: Thursday, February 02, 2017 Gty: Fountain Hills Project #; 17-1035-007 Location: Copperwynd Driveway north of Copperwynd Dr. AM Period NB 0 0 0 0 0 SB EB WB PIN Peed NB 3 SB EB WB 0 OOM 0 1 0 20:15 12:00 2 08:30 3 0 20:30 00:15 0 08:45 0 0 1 12:15 2 0 0 2 1 0 00:30 0 3 0 2 12:30 2 0 1 09:30 2 00:45 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 6 0 6 12 01:00 0 0 23:15 13:00 1 0 1 01:15 0 0 23:30 13:15 1 0 1 01.30 0 2 0 23:45 13:30 1 0 0 4 01:45 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 3 0 2 5 02:00 0 0 14:00 5 5 Daily Totals 02:15 0 0 14:15 2 1 6B WB Combined 02:30 0 0 14.30 0 1 132 02:45 0 0 0 0 14:45 1 8 1 8 16 03:00 0 14,3% 0 15:00 0 2 73.5% 03:15 0 11:45 0 15:15 2 1 15:45 03:30 0 6 0 15:30 2 4 21 03:45 0 0 0 0 15:45 0 4 2 9 13 04:00 0 0 16:00 1 3 04:15 0 0 16:15 1 7 04:30 0 0 16:30 3 4 04:45 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 5 0 14 19 05:00 0 0 17:00 0 0 05:15 0 0 17:15 0 0 05:30 0 0 17:30 2 7 05:45 0 0 0 0 17:45 4 6 3 10 16 06:00 0 0 18:00 1 1 06:15 0 0 18:15 0 0 06:30 1 0 18:30 0 0 06.45 2 3 0 0 3 18:45 0 1 1 2 3 07:00 07:15 07:30: 07:45 1 0 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 19:15 19:30 5 19:45 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 08:00 3 1 20:00 0 0 08:15 1 0 20:15 0 0 08:30 0 0 20:30 0 0 08:45 4 8 0 1 9 20:45 0 0 0 0 09:00 1 0 21:00 0 3 09:15 2 0 21:15 0 0 09:30 2 0 21:30 0 0 09:45 1 6 0 0 6 21:45 0 0 0 3 3 10:00 0 0 22:00 0 2 10:15 1 0 22:15 0 1 10:30 1 1 22:30 0 1 10:45 0 2 1 2 4 22:45 0 0 0 4 4 11:00 3 2 23:00 2 2 11:15 3 0 23:15 0 0 11:30 0 0 23:30 0 0 11:45 0 6 0 2 8 23:45 0 2 0 2 4 Total Vol. 30 5 35 35 62 97 GPS Coordinates: Daily Totals NB 5B 6B WB Combined 65 67 132 AM_ PM Split 0/0 85.7% 14,3% 26.5% 36.1% 63.9% 73.5% Peak Hour 08:45 11:45 11:45 13:30 15:30 15:45 Volume 9 6 12 8 16 21 R.H.F. 0.56 0.50 0.60 0.40 0.57 0.66 APPENDIX C EXISTING PEAK DOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS CivTech ACM 2010 TVVSC 1: Eagle Ridge Or & Copperwynd Dr 21154017 IntWay, s-vah i NBT—NBR, —SOL—Or Vol. vehh 7 4 64 8 3 26 CDnN:hn Pett Uh a 0 0 a 0 a Sign C"Aral Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Charrrekecl - None %ne - hiorbe SlOrdgC Length 0 6,22 a 110 Vehin Whan StDrdge,4 a - 0 - Grade. % 0 Free a - 0 peak !Ri3pirFade* 90 ID " 90 00 W He" vefi-des. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MwM Flow 8 4 17 9 3 29 QwMirrof Minotl Cmxrty (Yeh,11y maucri — —3Aapi2 Cunt K*g Fbw AJ 117 81 0 0 86 a ag-F 1 41 70 1 1 Stage 2 36 0 0 0 a 0 C*:A NJ" 6A2 6,22 a 4.12 crt*4 K* Sig 1 5A2 - Sbw Sep - Cr "St 2 5.42 Free Fru Free Fokw-up Hdwy 1518 131B 2238 Pal Cap -1 Raneuver 879 979 None 1510 S" 1 942 - - Stage 2 w 115 Plat" bWeA % VLh in Wediari Storage 9 Moycwl Uawtw 877 979 Isla %4ovCw2Mang *r 877 - 0 0 9age 1 942 0 - slaw 2 984 90 90 so N 9 93 do 00 .143 90 HN CLilrol D -lay, Heavehidin, % 2 0 1.8 HCl! U)& A 2 2 2 W,WL.Ox mum EK__f8T_SA Cmxrty (Yeh,11y 912 1510 HCM Lam VC Ratio (LO13 102 HCM Currml Delay (0 9 14 HCO Lam LOS A A HCU 951h Ule 0(vah) 01 0 CoWrWYW R—KM 2114rM7 bhlirg AM Sgara 8 Report OwTech PR90 I HCM 2010 TSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest [Dr(Surnmit Cr North ZqM? MI Delay. sAmh 1.1 Q"VMO EK__f8T_SA Va INDT WBR NFA _W8T NER SOL %T SSR VOL vl!bh 5 0 a H 1 4 4 70 1 1 40 0 Cafthng Peds AAr 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 D a D 0 0 Siy carw SbP Sbw Sep StepSWp Slap Free Free Fru Free Free free RTUmne[crEd None Wne 80rap Length 125 115 VLh in Wediari Storage 9 - Ciade, % 0 0 0 - Peg Hour Fador 90 90 so N 9 93 do 00 .143 90 90 90 Heavehidin, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 WILL -loft 6 a 0 1 1 4 4 78 1 1 44 a ConkffN Fkrw All 137 135 44 114 IM 18 44 c 0 79 a Stage 1 47 47 - BT 87 Stage 2 w 88 - 47 47 Critical Hdwy 712 6.52 6.22 712 6.52 522 4,12 Critical Hdwy % 1 6.12 552 - BA2 5.52 Cntcal Hd" St 2 6.12 5,52 512 5.52 FA—j) H&y 1518 4.010 3,319 1M 4-018 3.318 2219 2218 (lot Cop -1 Wafiemr 834 7% 1026 M 757 983 1561, 1519 Shige, 1 SP 856 - 921 823 Stage 2 917 822 - C67 456 Plalcog bWcked, % "CaO Mamuver 827 754 1026 m 755 943 1561 1519 MwCap-21dweimr 827 754 - m 755 - Siage 1 965 955 919 821 Stage 2 909 KID . M 9% WR HCM ConW Detail- s 94 9 3. Q 2 HCU LOS A A -RU–INUMGME11597-ML—W -SER R Calk" (-Kql) t564 827 910 Mg HCM Lane VC Rabo 0,003 0307 D -OD? 0.001 KM C*nW Delays} 73 999 ?A HCM Lane LOS A A A A W -M 951h Vle Qvehl a 0 0 0 CoppewyndRuGg 21M2017EWirog AM %TOM 8 Report CrvTech Page 2 HCM 2010 TVVSC 3: Eagle fridge Dr & Sunwit Dr South 2rl5l2017 friSbt�1 _ IN L>e!e7. Vw_h 1.2 UNEW EEL EBT s 'WBL YBF 1HE6d RBL NBfi 1M SK 5117 541;4 VVLwh% 0 56 a 1 72 0 1 0 0 i6 0 0 CMAC* Fels. WN 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sign Ca4d Free Free FrEe Fie Free Rm Slop Stop Stop Slop Slop Stop RTClrarrne4red Haa Ilehides, % . Nam 2 Noce 2 Nwe 2 Mrnrnt F5ow None Storage L -ft 100 - a 49 301 6 NunnesorL.a*s 0 1 1 0 a 1 1 0 Veh4rMedian Sbraage,.= - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 .. Grade, % 3 0 505 252 0 0 0 5 0 29 Peak Hour Fwar 90 90 9a 90 90 43 90 90 90 90 90 90 Hear? Vem:ies. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 momtF" 0 55 0 1 80 a 1 0 0 SB 0 a 0.09 0.056 0.016 0.928 05 departure {Hdi M cT 6.822 6.117 8.414 2.23 &354 iy0r T M 9 Flow Al 00 0 0 56 0 a 138 138 56 136 138 80 Stage 1 - - - - - - 55 56 - 82 SZ - stw 2 - 4.749 4.589 - 6.197 82 62 56 56 3.701 Tbcal"Awy 412 029 0.387 4.12 0.045 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 652 6-22 CTwedHdwySkg 1 - 12.6 13.7 - 11.6 W 5.52 - 8-12 5.52 - CT6:al HNy S?g 2 - B e - B 5.12 5.52 6.12 5.37 - F©lbw-upHNY 2.218 1.2 1.8'. 2216 61 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.U13 3.318 Pdl Capr1 Afaneum 1518 1590 833 353 1011 833 753 980 stage t - - - %5 849 - 926 827 stage 2 - 926 8277 45m 848 PUDon tdaded, % May Cap,IUaneuwr 1518 1549 632 152 1011 832 752 980 MovCap,2Mianeow _ _ _ 832 752 - 832 752 - SbNe 1 - 956 848 926 8216 sbge 2 - - - - - - 925. 826 - 958 848 - 11 HCM Caro Delay. s 0 0. F 93 9.4 4CM LOB A A WWW`- NBLFf EOE. -FB1= EBR '4i9C Mr 1tiiuRS131-�i1-- Capa* 1vluh} 832 1518 154" 832 MM LaneVIC Ria O.©ol . 0.001 0.021 HCMCoruaoDew (s) 9.3 0 7.3 0 9.4 HcmLaw LOS A A A A A W -ma %seQ1veii) 0 a a - 0.1 CWemyncl Rmd 2f IQ017 Edvlkg AM Syn&ro 8 %pod CrAech Page 3 HCM 2010 AW SC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrfPalomino Blvd 20WD17 wrSectian td". s4eh 26.5 -_ - - - - - Oppasing APP -1 W8 EB „g InLens ui LOS D 2 3 Con5cWq Approach Let S13 Na EB a»er�=- - 3 3 2 1 1 REI NBT VOL vetch 017 1 29 0 35 3 22 0 44 271 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 6.90 0 90 0.90 0.911 0.90 0-96 0-90 0.90 090 0 90 0.90 Haa Ilehides, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mrnrnt F5ow 0 19 1 32: 0 39 3 24 a 49 301 6 NunnesorL.a*s 0 1 1 0 a 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 K_-- - 33% -_ - - - - - Oppasing APP -1 W8 EB „g 4gms n9 Laws 2 2 3 Con5cWq Approach Let S13 Na EB ConBdtarg Lanes Left 3 3 2 ConFxbng Approach Right M SB WB Con5ding Lam Ripht 3 3 2 HCM u"- 10" 16.9 11.3 13-2 F1CM LOS B B B SKIIIt SOLO 'slo V-31 Lek % 33% US's 076 10040. 0% 900". 0,6 W.; 0% 0% Val Tift % 67°9 100% 0`X, 0% 3!- 12% Ci'A 100% 92% Vd Rqk % 0% lr4 100% 0% 9716 0% 63% DPA D% 8 sp flcwhd SbP %* Step Stop Slap Sb3p St* Stag Skop SIN TrATcValhyLane 134 1Bl 5 17 30 35 25 8 505 274 LT VCl 44 0 0 17 0 35 a 8 0. 0 Thrdu3h Vo 90 161 0 0 1 0 3 0 505 252 RTVcA 0 0 5 0 29 0 22 0 a 22 Lane Fbw Retie t49 201 6 19 33 39 28 9 561 305 G --e yClip 8 B 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 LlegmeddU61M 0.29 0.38 0.003 0.044 0.067 0.09 0.056 0.016 0.928 05 departure {Hdi 6-987 6.822 6.117 8.414 2.23 &354 7.232 E461 5.958 5.902 Corwargerae. YiN Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 513 526 SM 424 493 427 4113 553 606 610 Sew" TOM 4.749 4.589 3,878 6.197 5.013 6.134 5.0$2 4208 3.701 3-648 HCM Lane VC Ratio 029 0.387 601 0.045 0.067 0.091 0.057 0.016 0.926 0.5 F1CM Control Dalay 12.6 13.7 8.9 11.6 10.5 12 10.4 9.3 45.1 AA HCM Lane LOS B e A B 13 B B A E 8 Hem °UWde Q 1.2 1.8'. 0 61 U,2 0.3 02 0 12 28 CoPPerwpd %wd 2l1A72U17 FvU4 AM SMnpva 8 ReM DvTed Page 4 HCM 2410 AWSC 4= Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DdPalomina Blvd MY2017 FTi mgAppmach NB Opposing La- 3 Conflicting Appmad Left lntee�n Delay, sNeh ConBcOrg Lis Left 2 CcaF drq P.ppvxh Rghd EB NbBs ian LOS 2 [-CM Canlml Delay 34 kCM LOS L"taerot 18M 433 7 -- Vol, we" 0 8 757 22 Peak Haw Fa= 090 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hemy Vehsles, 2 2 2 2 Wrl Flaw 0 9 all 24 KunnberiAL.anes 0 1 2 0 FTi mgAppmach NB Opposing La- 3 Conflicting Appmad Left W9 ConBcOrg Lis Left 2 CcaF drq P.ppvxh Rghd EB UAdavyLanesfvt 2 [-CM Canlml Delay 34 kCM LOS 6 l:arr� Coypemynd Reseal 21 A 017 Eustirg AM SyMbro 8 Report. CivTech Page 5 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 2A52017 � 1� 1(~ I-`4 t ".'* * .1 - 2i ll if N_ R09C Wu- NBa 8 z -1 Lem Can6garalions Ji #f4 i" ' #ft r< i 1s 'f f ff volone{tieh411 258 433 7 1 959 52 12 10 12 76 4 793 iLw*w 7 4 14 3 B 16 5 2 12 1 6 16 1rofid Q{Qbj, aeh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-8hA+djfkpbTt i 1.00 190 1.00 5.00 1.00 1M 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adi 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11013 AdjSatFlatr.veh%in 1863 18163 1863 184'x3 1013 1063 1863 1863 19M 1863 IM3 1663 Adj Flax Rte, WK4 287 481 8 1 1066 59 13 41 13 84 4 861 ACI No, of lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 t 1 0 1 1 2 Peak HowFariar 0.90 0.90 0.90 R90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 WX 0.90 0.90 0.90 Per-„ e k Heavy Veb.. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 cap,+ehl11 372 2128 662 2 1599 564 2Z 279 330 641 727 1399 - - Awe On Green 011 042 042 M 0.31 0.31 0.01 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.39 0.39 S# Fbw, vdul4 3442 S085 1583 1774 SASS 1583 1774 779 921 1774 t863 2787 Gip Vc,"vl. vehm 287 481 6 1 1056 M 13 0 24 84 4 881 ap Sat Fbrwjs},vet6hdn1721 1695 1583 1774 1855 1583 1774 0 1700 1774 tB33 1393 0Serve[g_s),s 73 5,5 0.3 0.1 16A 2.2 A.7 0.0 0.n 76 0.1 20.9 Cycle ACleaQa_-o},s 7.3 3.5 U V 16.4 22 0.7 0.0 0.8 26 al 20.9 Prop In k" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 Lace Grp QWcj, WM 312 2128 662 2 15M S64 22 0 609 641 727 1389 VIC Rati xl 0-77 0.23 0.01 0.51 4.67 0.10 0.58 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.01 0.63 Avail Q*c_a),vehrh 335 2373 739 118 1521 669 118 0 609 611 727 1389 HCM Plaaon Raba 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Up seri Fii"q 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.110 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UrdamDelaj(d),aheh39.1 16.6 15.3 44.9 27A 19.4 44.2 OA 1&8 16.3 168 16.6 Incr Delay (d2). sNeh 4.3 0.1 0.0 128.6 0.7 0. t 23.1 0.0 a 0.1 a0 22 IniWQ0elay(d31,s40 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0-0 00 0.0 0.0 ao 0.0 0.4 0.0 °,'ule Back0l0(50r%j veKW.7 2,5 0.1 0.1 7.8 1.0 0.5 0.0 OA 1.3 0.1 &4 LnCepNh*d).sMehh 43.3 169 15.3 173-5 27.7 14.5 67.3 0.0 1&9 t6A 16.8 188 L,,Grp LOS 0 B B F C 8 E B B R B kWaadrVakveWh 776 11266 37 960 Kwooch Delay, Sdreh 2&6 274 35.9 18.6 AppmachLCAS C C 0 B aeler 3 5 _ B Ass6rrnezl Phs 1 All l3W904 *C Y+Rok sJS.9 2 35.2 3 4.1 4 49.7 5 5.1 6 39.1 7 13.7 a 32A ClnaWPerbd(Y--P.cf.s4..4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.D 4.0 Mac GreenSN*{iyr>vvI},@ 220 fi.0 420 6.0 29,0 14;0 34.0 MaxQC1exTw*(g cA1l.8a 28 21 7.5 27 229 9.3 184 C3eenEelTire(pchs 0.0 4.0 0.0 1&0 0,0 a0 114 9.6 FEM 20 fa C hf petal 24.4 HCU2010 2010 LOS C CaplaerwyndResad 2114,4017 Exp AM 8Repan MWTEch Page,7 HCM 2010 TWSC 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & Drrveway A V15012 Intersection Int Way, veh 2 m6 merl WBL wm --im NBft SEC -SBT vaR vel-.% 23 0 16 57 0 1 CoAc ng Pada. Ply 0 0 0 0 0 0 RnCantm Sip Stop Free Free Free Fm -- reeRTChamn RT Chamked - None - Pbne . NDM Sewage Lr 0 Fc wr-up14*Y 80 4eh in pian Siora2e. # O Ro1Cao-1 Maneuver 0 - 0 Grade, % O 973 0 - - 0 Peak 1-4ourFac1er 90 90 40 90 90 9U Heavyvelldes.`e 2 2 2 2 2 2 W^tFle+w 26 0 1a 113 0 2 dpproacr —W NB 99 HCM Control Decay. s HCM'LC6 A Y---vWrd -1 _ = 1 Conlicting Flow All 56 49 0 0 a 1 0 Stage 1 49 - - - 2 7 0 Sign Cordial CrvaHd" 6.42 5.22 - - 4-12 - Crb aE 51x31 5.42 - - Cr6ca1?dnyStr 2 5.42 - Fc wr-up14*Y 3.518 3-316 - - 2218 - Ro1Cao-1 Maneuver 552 1020 15f7 Sage 1 973 0 - aNe 2 101$ - - - - - P13io m tibckecL % He3 Ndzhcles. % 2 2 - - - MEwCap_l Mane4-`er 952 1020 1517 mwCaPAMwr_mRr 952 i _ Slaw 1 973 1012 Slate 2 1816 99a - dpproacr —W NB 99 HCM Control Decay. s HCM'LC6 A Y---vWrd NEST N _ Capa*Que") - . 952 iSi2 HCM tare vm Raffia 0.027 HCM Corrbml Dray {s] 8.9 0 HCMLase LOS A A r1CM956h%?a4(aeh) 0.1 0 Coppe� Rsv« 2x14112417 E sWq AM Syncluo8 Report OYT;:sh page HCM ZOIC TWSC 7: Capperwrynd Cr & Driveway B 2✓ WN17 Irl Delay, SAO 27 ER NE HCM CGarMD1 Delay, s 45 0 8 s HCM LOS A M—,iitU*Ww rt1 EBT 'NBT WBR S'F.L' n 1 eapady{-w3y t50B - 1070 HCM vrl;Ra€ro O.CAS - - - 0.001 — IAHCM Carrtro1Delay (Q 7.2 0 84 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM" I,"b(veht 9 0 Capperwynd Resor V14,r24117 E AM %,ichro 8 Report Ch'Tech Page 10 —EBL W ST MR :-- vo( veh+h 7 4 10 0 0 1 Cor' dmg Peds Air 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cordial Frey; Free Free Free S§rg Slop RTChannekzed -Mane - Mare - Norte Sbxw LeroU 5.42 follow-upHdwy 2218 veh in Medial Storage, # 0 0 0 983 Graam, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour fador 9O 90 90 90 90 He3 Ndzhcles. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 khrntFpne 8 4 11 D a i ER NE HCM CGarMD1 Delay, s 45 0 8 s HCM LOS A M—,iitU*Ww rt1 EBT 'NBT WBR S'F.L' n 1 eapady{-w3y t50B - 1070 HCM vrl;Ra€ro O.CAS - - - 0.001 — IAHCM Carrtro1Delay (Q 7.2 0 84 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM" I,"b(veht 9 0 Capperwynd Resor V14,r24117 E AM %,ichro 8 Report Ch'Tech Page 10 amt M*(Z W=r2 -- ConBc6ngFl)wAll 11 0 - 0 31 11 Stage 1 1t Stage 2 20 vkal Hd,+y 4.12 6.42 6.22 Cetical Hdrry 5101 5.42 Critical Hdxy Slg 2 5.42 follow-upHdwy 2218 3.51a 3.318 POGap-1 Maneuw. 1508 983 1070 Stage 1 - 1012 Stare 2 1003 Platoon WcV44 y Cap -I Maw-uoer IRS 978 1070 Wq Cap -2 Manemr - - - 978 _ Stage 1 1012 Stage 2 99a - ER NE HCM CGarMD1 Delay, s 45 0 8 s HCM LOS A M—,iitU*Ww rt1 EBT 'NBT WBR S'F.L' n 1 eapady{-w3y t50B - 1070 HCM vrl;Ra€ro O.CAS - - - 0.001 — IAHCM Carrtro1Delay (Q 7.2 0 84 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM" I,"b(veht 9 0 Capperwynd Resor V14,r24117 E AM %,ichro 8 Report Ch'Tech Page 10 HCM 2010 T SC 1; Eagle Ridge Or $ CoppenArpd Or N15RD17 Int Dehy. s`aeh 1.9 fkauem:M WBL YM h96f Conlic" Flow A:1 1,10, veKIA 12 7 32 13 4 39 EonFactingPeds.!4l 0 0 a 0 0 0 5ignOntrol Skop Stop Ftee Free Free Free RTCrarmnked - New - Name - None Storage L-0 0 - - - - Fok,*LrpY.tny t 19 VO in aAedian Storage.- 0 - 0 - - 4 Grade, % 0 579 4 4 Peak RwrFachx 90 N til 90 90 90 He3ryVelri*L% 2 2 2° 2 2 2 "tRow 13 6 35 14 4 43 �` IAmr1 Capacfy I-blh} �aj3r9 -- - — - - Conlic" Flow A:1 95 43 9 0 50 4 Sage 1 43 - - - Slage 2 52 0 0 cokal lidh y 6.42 622 412 Criical "JAY Sig 1 5.42 - - Cmkal itdrey S1g 2 5.-42 - - - - - Fok,*LrpY.tny 3,5% 3.316 2.216 Pa{C19-1 Marw der 905 1027 1557 Stage 1 579 - - stagn 2 970 _ _ PWwn 4A7cked, % 5.52 - - - - MovCapIManeuer 9913 1027 1557 NlovCap-2Mmmurer 963 - - - - Siam 1 974 0 3.318 slage 2 968 2.219 0 Pot Cap- lMawmr 8 771 NB SE T IiCM Cansa4 iSe ay, s 8 4 Peal How Famr 0 V. HCMLOS A 913 90 Wftlar9.atleA�aRMAM NBT N n1 S13L 'SST Capacfy I-blh} 945 1557 - HCM Lane VC Ralo 4.022 0.003 14CM Carmol Delay (sf 8.9 7.3 +#CIN LEme LOS A A KM 9510 °utile O(vehl al a Coppua)md RemA 2114121717 Em5(itg Poi %Khri 8 Renal ICWTeGh Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Clovd Cresl DOSummil Dr North 2115£2417 hL ue479. sAeh I9L EB'6' tBA . — NIL 1WBfi W — ` Int tw WR vol, 3 4 0 9 © 3 3 46 1 4 53 2 Cor'8wiing Pads, Arlo 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 SigoCasnh sbp Stop Stop Shap Shap Stop Free Free Free Free Free Frce R7 Clannckmd - - I',Grre - - None - - Nome - - Kane Star -age Uno 6.12 5.52 125 5.52 - - 115 Crtaaal Hiwy S13 2 612 Veh in Median Storage• 4 4 6.12 4 - - - 0 Fcdo-up Hdwy 3.518 0 3.318 C3ade, % 4 2.219 0 Pot Cap- lMawmr 8 771 1005 0 771 1416 Peal How Famr 90 94 90 90 90 90 913 90 90 94 W 9* HW Vehiclr-, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvni1 Fhw 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 51 1 0 59 7 EB we- KB HCM •Contm,Cglay.s 92 86 0.4 , U,.. HCM L CS A A Miner l_arwr'AMapor 4vrvd NK NBT NgR €Bitil MBLn l SAL W- SOR C2pecity fWvlrl 1542 - - 9951 1016 1557 - HCk+La7eViCRaLo 0.002 -1 D340-003 - HCM Contr-,1'Celay(sl 7.3 9.2 8.6 0 WA LBm i0s A A A A HCM 950, %,* 0[,eh) 0 0 4 4 Coppe,% and Resort 274411017 Exi litrg PM Sltrchrta 8 Rep" CreTech paw 2 f2 - Cmff&mgFbwAn 124 119 60 1i$ 119 52 5t 0 0 52 0 9M Stege 1 60 64 m 58 - Stage 2 64 59 60 61 _ Crural FUwy 7 12 652 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 4 12 Cr4cal Him Sig 1 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - - - - Crtaaal Hiwy S13 2 612 5.52 - 6.12 $.52 - - - - - - - Fcdo-up Hdwy 3.518 4.418 3.318 3.516 4.918 3.318 2.219 2 216 - Pot Cap- lMawmr 855 771 1005 858 771 1416 1542 IS;A suz_ae 1 451 845 - 454 847 Slag^ 2 %1 846 - 951 $44 _ P7alepnWked.% MCN car l4laneuver 851 710 1065 857 TO 1016 1542 1554 - Mrrvcap,2Maneuver 851 774 - $57 774 - • - - - stage I 474 845 952 B45 Stage 2 9'46 844 - 951 844 EB we- KB HCM •Contm,Cglay.s 92 86 0.4 , U,.. HCM L CS A A Miner l_arwr'AMapor 4vrvd NK NBT NgR €Bitil MBLn l SAL W- SOR C2pecity fWvlrl 1542 - - 9951 1016 1557 - HCk+La7eViCRaLo 0.002 -1 D340-003 - HCM Contr-,1'Celay(sl 7.3 9.2 8.6 0 WA LBm i0s A A A A HCM 950, %,* 0[,eh) 0 0 4 4 Coppe,% and Resort 274411017 Exi litrg PM Sltrchrta 8 Rep" CreTech paw 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Eagle Ridge Or & Summit Dr South 21152017 lr�ersec3an - Ird Delay, s.'mh 1.2 2 CxnihcErtg Fkm Aa L E 72 0 0 9 - 'BT -WOR - -119r- TBR S T SM VpL Whir 1 64 1 0 47 21 0 0 1 16 0 1 Can!§c6ng Peds.. *hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 SignCardrol Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Shop Slop Slap Sop Stop RTOmne#ed - - Mone 6.12 bYane Hare - - - - - - 6Fnne Storage Leng$ 100 6.12 5.52 - Fo4ow-up Hdlry 2218 - 2.218 3.518 4.016 Veh in Wed= Storage. - 0 - - p - - 0 - - 0 - Grade. % - 0 - 0 0 - 833 0 947 PeakHawrFalca 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 98 9d 90 90 90 Henry V&kts. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M`mtFlow 1 7r 1 0 52 23 0 0 1 18 0 1 2 CxnihcErtg Fkm Aa 76 0 0 72 0 0 139 150 12 136 138 64 S&P 1 - - - - - - 74 74 - 64 64 - Mxr- 2 - Inb?mgcb n LCIS 64 76 "a 74 74 - Cr3A21H&y 412 - - 4.12 - - T12 6.52 6.22 7-12 8.52 6.22 Cr" MwSlg 1 - 0 6-12 5.52 - 6.12 M2 - Cr6mlmwt Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 . 6.12 5.52 - Fo4ow-up Hdlry 2218 - 2.218 3.518 4.016 3-318 3.518 4.016 3.318 PotCaL'1 MaePeuer 1523 1578 633 742 941 833 753 1000 Siege 1 7 - 535 833 - 947 842 Stage 2 - 1 941 832 - 935 833 P13bon bkreked. % R5 Vol 0 0 39 4 31 0 Mw Cap i Maneuver 1523 1526 832 742 9% 832 753 1000 Am Cap -2 Mannener 41 22 832 742 - 832 753 Stage 1 8 S 034 632 8 946 892 Slage 2 8 Degree ofkN(X) 946 832 1x061 933 832 Apprnadl -- _wa - yyg NB 1 -. KM CpKrol Delay. s 01 SB p 8.6 9.4 HCM LW 3 cmllriitro AWIx'raeh Let Su A A EB Conkting Lanes Left, T1e�R8 � ` WE'c T-9 Inb?mgcb n LCIS Grrlriatl eori mt`E Ganl%img AppMad RK1 "a Capacity WAN ON 1523 - - 1528 3 HCM Lane Ratio 0.041 0.001 - 0.072 HCM Cordrol D -Lay (s) B6 7.4 0 9.4 HCM Lane UDS A A A A HCM 95th%tile 0(velnl 0 0 0 0.1 Capperwynd Resort MCA 17 Exis" PM Sync - 8 Report CuTech Page 3 HCM 2010 A1WSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Or1t'alormnc Blvd 2115017 ii Oa _wa - c 4tH EB SB 010ming Lames dnferserircm DeW. %Neh 21.3 3 cmllriitro AWIx'raeh Let Su 1€li EB Conkting Lanes Left, 3 Inb?mgcb n LCIS G Ganl%img AppMad RK1 "a Se WB C nffet ng Lanes Hight 3 3 L aMV �W - L M -E13R -M--W C wgk- Md -Na }ter --M D Vol, MehJf 0 30 6 31 0 241 4 16 0 IB $70 35 Peak Fklr«Fariar 0.90 0.9(I 0.90 090 0.90 0.91) 090 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 A90 Heavy Vehzies. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MwwM Fla" 0 33 7 34 0 22 4 i6 4 20 744 40 N r9Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 Cappuwynd Resort 27144201; Existing PM Syntirro 8 Repan CrfTeeh Paje 4 _wa - c pPWserrJPC+h 4tH EB SB 010ming Lames 2 2 3 cmllriitro AWIx'raeh Let Su 1€li EB Conkting Lanes Left, 3 3 2 Ganl%img AppMad RK1 "a Se WB C nffet ng Lanes Hight 3 3 2 HCMCor.mlDe* 11.3 11.2 26.3 HCM L45 8 9 D Cappuwynd Resort 27144201; Existing PM Syntirro 8 Repan CrfTeeh Paje 4 'E$�n1 `W$lril V1`a3Ln2-W&j, '&Kj' "S�3- Vol Let % In 100% 0% 111 % D% 163. 0% 0',t Va1Thru.'% 93% 180r Q% 090 16% D% 2V. 0% IDO% We% Vol RgM.% m 100% 0% 84% V. M 0% 13:6 S4n,cor[ 1 Skrp Shap Sbp Scup S1np Slap Shop Slap Ship Skrp Traffic Vui by Lane 241 447 38 30 37 20 28 12 249 143 LTVot 18 0 0 30 0 20 0 12 0 0 TI1 Vol 223 447 0 0 6 0 4 0 249 125 R5 Vol 0 0 39 4 31 0 16 0 0 18 Lane Flow Rate 266 4% 40 33 41 22 22 13 217 159 C-ebyrG+p 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree ofkN(X) 0.461 0.848 1x061 0978 0.084 0.053 0.046 9.027 0.518 0.293 Depab-Fle.d jK 6.191 6.154 5-449 8442 7.348 8351 7.483 7.239 6.735 6646 CnrweWnce.'YIN Yes yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 579 M 659 422 495 417 475 493 535 539 Serme Tree 3.996 3.91 3205. 6.232 5.138 5-347 5.279 5,006 4302 4.413 HCM LamevjrR*D 0.463 0.&48 0.061 0.079 0.W5 0.053 WAS 0.026 0.51$ Q295 HCM ConWDelay 14.2 342 86 12 10.8 118 10.6 10.2 t6-8 122 HC4MLa+eLOS B D A tit B 8 8 lit C B HCM 95&Se0 2d 9.r 0.2 0.3 03 02 01 a 3 12 Cappuwynd Resort 27144201; Existing PM Syntirro 8 Repan CrfTeeh Paje 4 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Ur1Pa1ominD Blvd 2+1501T Lire Copperwymd Resart 2J14jMI7 E*Am 134,1 %%chra 8 Revod CWTW Page 5 HCMi 21010 Signalized Interssectian Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Bhrd Y15017 J ,� r~ 4, t e� 1 W EEC EBT-qR h�L W87 WH9 NBL 8747 IJER SK SOT SM - Lane Confguraliuns 11 tf r OpposOAppraach INB Opposing l_ares 1i42rsedciDel3j..S 'r Cnn@o-tingApproachLeft WB CaoRcfiag Lane& LO 2 Imrsecben LOS EB Crm" Lanes Rift 2 FCM c4f*cd Cezy Mrwr -- S8L1 SBL SBT SBR - - -- -- Vol, vAAr 0 12 314 IB Peak"rFacLof 0.90 090 0.80 090 Heavy Nehices, % 2 2 2 2 MYO. Fbw 0 13 4116 20 NijnterofLanes 0 1 2 0 Lire Copperwymd Resart 2J14jMI7 E*Am 134,1 %%chra 8 Revod CWTW Page 5 HCMi 21010 Signalized Interssectian Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Bhrd Y15017 J ,� r~ 4, t e� 1 W EEC EBT-qR h�L W87 WH9 NBL 8747 IJER SK SOT SM - Lane Confguraliuns 11 tf r OpposOAppraach INB Opposing l_ares 3 Cnn@o-tingApproachLeft WB CaoRcfiag Lane& LO 2 OoriftbngAppmachRlght EB Crm" Lanes Rift 2 FCM c4f*cd Cezy 14.9 HCkl LITS B Lire Copperwymd Resart 2J14jMI7 E*Am 134,1 %%chra 8 Revod CWTW Page 5 HCMi 21010 Signalized Interssectian Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Bhrd Y15017 J ,� r~ 4, t e� 1 W EEC EBT-qR h�L W87 WH9 NBL 8747 IJER SK SOT SM - Lane Confguraliuns 11 tf r ) t4f r ) k ? fr vokune (ue"I 67b 1258 15 4 503 75 20 3 3 47 7 361 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 16 16 rnu () pb), Vol0 O 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ped-15keA*A-$TJ 1.00 1.90 i.OD 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1(110 6.00 PaftV 51us, A4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 130 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,D0 Adi Sal Flow, %oMvin 1963 1863 1863 1663 1963 ISH 18113 IB63 1000 186'3 $863 1863 Adi Fbw Rale, vehfi 751 1399 17 4 470 83 22 3 3 52 6 401 Adj N3. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1. 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak %I r Facimr 6.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 a4M 9.90 0.90 0.90 DA 0.90 Percerm Heauyveh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 CW,aehrt 8211 2376 740 8 1185 420 33 273 273 581 618 1590 Amm On Cin 024 0.47 0.47 OA 0.23 0.23 Q02 9.32 0.32 9.03 D.33 0.33 Sat Fkw.+ehih 3442 5985 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 656 Bio 1774 1843 2787 Cxp ldkr x(w},veNA T51 13% 17 4 474 83 22 0 6 52 $ 401 Grp Sal Fkmjs},vehMn1l721 1695 15M 1774 195 1583 177A 0 1712 1774 1843 1303 a Sevot#g-S). s 19.1 18.2 0.5 0.2 10.5 37 1.1 0.0 0.2 IA 0.3 6.5 Cycle 0 Clea(g c}, s 19.1 182 0.5 0.2 105 17 1.1 0.0 0.2 It 0.3 6.5 Prop In Lana 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D13 9.50 t.00 1.00 Lae Grp Cap(c). veW $20 2376 740 8 1185 420 33 0 545 581 618 15M ViC RaBq* 0.92 0.59 0.02 D.53 0.57 0.29 0.66 0.00 6.01 0.09 0.01 0.25 Atal G*c aj, velufq 811 2376 740 296 1606 614 79 0 515 603 618 15M HCM Pt Mco Rasa 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1A0 1.00 00 1.00 (4s -pi"') 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 t.DO 090 1.00 1.00 1.00 1A1] Unikrm+Delay (dL,&wh33.4 17.6 ti9 44.7 37.5 25.6 439 9.0 21.1) 19.5 20.2 9.7 IncrDnW(d2),s1wh 713 O.4 '00 4&.1 0.4 12 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 9'.4 Ini9a14DeWd31, Wh 0.0 D6 0.0 9.0 0.0 1).9 D.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0,0 0.0 '16ieBaiO(C1(599E�, hR9.7 8.8 D.2 0.2 4.9 1:6 07 0.0 0.1 0.9 OA 7-6 LnLrpDE*cg,s4eh 47.7 18.0 t19 9Z9 30.9 25.9 63,8 0.0 21.0 19.8 2@2 10,1 LmGT LOS a O S F C C E C E C Approach Yo wM 2166 757 28 461 Approach Delay, sksh 28.3 313.7 54,7 1!,3 Approach LOS C C D 8 mei-2�3 4 S 6 7 8- Assign Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ PtrsDurrafim(G-Y4c).6.9 327 4.4 *0 5.7 319 255 25.9 Change, Period (Y+Rc], s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Gm SeUing (Gml*fl 16.0 15.0 39.0 4.0 16.0 220 320 AlaiClearTmelg c+11j,8 22 22 20.2 3.1 8.5 21.1 125 Giem Eat 7ffw IFF d, s 10 1A p0 14.0 0.9 1.1 9.3 &.5 y = -- - - - ROM 2010 CLI D6* 26.7 HCM 2010 LOS C Capperaynd Resort 211412817 E*Xrn PAI 5y xhro 8 Report OYU6 Pagel HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Eagte Ridge Dr 8, Driveway A 2r15 sDTP iraDe*, &�eh 4.3 6T "rmr — - RG. 14m NRI Nff- CmIk" Fkm ki valvehh 40 9 2 37 0 3 CG6n keting Peds, g1ty 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign rA*d Slop Stop free Free Free Free RTC.hanndkaed - More Noce . New Storm Lertu 0 - Faflrru>FHdVry EO - Yeh in lbadLan Storms. a 9 Pcifap-1Maneuver 0 - - 0 made, % 0 1080 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heart' v0 des, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 hwt Flow 44 D 2 41 0 3 6T "rmr — - Mnor1 - --- 1w W— CmIk" Fkm ki 26 23 0 0 43 0 stwfl 1 23 - - Slwft 2 3 0 0 CritxzlHdwe 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwg St9 1 FA2 - - Crkal Fid" St 2 5.42 - Faflrru>FHdVry 3518 3.318 - - 2-219 - Pcifap-1Maneuver 999 1054 15666 stw 1, 1080 - Yeh in Meilen Slorage. # 5tage 2 1020 0 Platiao-a bbcked. % Mav Cap -I marwuuer w 1054 1586 May Calt-2manerrunr 989 CKJ a3 Stage i 1{100 90 90 Stage 2 1022 2 14waach YY& 3'1{3 s HCM CorAml Delay, s 8.8 0 0 HCM LOS A wdiilaieA{aprMtr>,x N9T 191IR HLn1 SBL 581' Cap" (veh"h) - - %a 1566 - HCJV Lane WC Pzb 0.015 . HCM Cwtrol DeW (s) 88 0 Hcm Larne LOS A A HCFA 951h %tile CgveN O.t 0 Coppemynd Resat 7JI4011 Ex+tng PM Synchro 8 Report CivFech Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 7: Coppe rwynd Dr & Driveway 8 2y15l11Y17 — In1 Delay, slvs.h 4 WOOTmat --m-Ter- 9L -TeT Vol Val. ven+h 7 10 $ 0 0 13 CanftliyPeds,Ah. 0 0 0 0 0 0 s1w Oaohd Fade Free Free Free Stop Slap RTChmneftd Nan None Nccre 6brage lenge - 0 Yeh in Meilen Slorage. # 0 0 0 - PeaktiourFachw CKJ a3 90 90 90 90 Heabyvehiules. 2 2 2 2 2 2 MW Flux 8 11 9 0 0 12 qoaWw -- r1 Co ffoxg F3]w All 9 0 0 36 9 Stage 1 - 9 WW 2 - 27 CrErai Hdey 4 12 6A2 6.22 ctcAHdwk N 1 - 3.42 - Crb:A Hdwy cag 2 5-42 - Follae-np W" 2.21$ 3.518 3.318 PotCeml MarrKW 1611 - - - 977 1073 suge.1 - - - - 1014 - Siaw2 - 996 - Pialoon blocked. Lkv Cad/Manemv 1611 - - - 972 4073 Marcap-2matnewer 972 - Stage 1 - 1014 Sbw 2 991 fipp aacV— s — HCM Cooed Delay. s 3 0 8.4 HCMLCS R lixx anelw4zicr3tvrert E8L-'MT r8 MTi -- - - Capwrt,(vc.nhr 1511 - - 1.073 HN Lane VIC Ratio 0.005 0.011 — HCM Contrte Celay (si T-2 0 84 HCM Lane LCIS A A A HGM 95th %M O(whl 0 - - - 0 Commyrid Resort N4M7 Ehsim PM Synchs 8 Report Ci+Tectr Page 10 APPENDIX D TRIP GENERATION C1vTech CopperWynd Apperidix D Phase 1 Cummulative Trip Generation March 2017 Proposed Land Use Types and Size Proposed Use Amount Units ITE LUC ITE Land Use Name Hotel or motel 96 Rooms 3117 Hotet Notes: -Abbreviations.- ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, LUC = land use code, SF = square feet, KSF = 1,000 square feet, DU = Dwelling Units, Keys = keyed guest units. -ITE methodology per the Trip Genera€+on Handbook its the basis for deciding which ratefequation to use_ Exceptions are highlighted. Base Trips ADT AM Out (not used) Proposed Use % In in Out Total % In In Out Total % In In Out Total Hotel or motel 50°r't. 428 428 856 58% 37 27 64 49% 35 36 Totals 428 428 856 37 27 54 35 31S 71 Page 1 of 3 CopperWynd Appendix D Phase 2 Cummulative Trip Generation February, 2017 Proposed Land Use Types and Size Proposed Use Amount Units ITE LUC ITE Land Use blame Hotel or motel 166 Roams 310 Hotel I Dotes: -Abbreviations: ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, LUC = land use code, 5F = square feet, KSF = 1,000 square feet, DLJ = Dwelling Units, Keys = keyed guest units. -ITE rnethodok)gy per the Trip Generation Handbook is the basis for decAing which rateieguation to use. Exceptions are highlighted. Base Trips ADT AM PM (not used) Proposed Use % In In Out Total % in Iry out Total % In In Out Total Hotel or hotel 5n 740 740 1,4$0 580!0 64 47 Ill 49% 64 63 123 Totals 744 740 11480 64 47 111 60 63 123 C i v T e c h Page 2 of 3 CvpperWynd Appendix D Phase 3 Cumrnulatiwe Proposed Land Use Types and Size Proposed Use Amount Units ITE LUC ITE Land Use Name Hotel or motel 268 Rooms 310 Hotel Trip Generation February, 2017 Notes: -Abbreviations: ITE = Institute of Transportafion Engineers, LUC = land use code, SF = square feet, KSF = 1,DDD square feet, DU ='Dwelling Units, Keys = keyed guest units- -ITE methodology per [be Trip Generation Handboak is the basis for deciding which ratelequation to use. Exceptions are highlighted, Base Trips AI3T AMG 'PM (not used) Proposed Use % In In Out Total °% In In Out Total % In In -Out Total Hotel Dr motel 50% 11195 1,195 2,390 58% 104 76 180 a% 97 101 198 Totals 1,195 1,199 2,390 104 76 180 91 101 198 CivT'ech Page 3 of 3 APPENDIXP � SELECTED EXCERPTS FROM PALISADES BOULEVARD AND EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE INTERSECTION NEEDS ASSESSMENT Ci v T e c h G. C i v T e c h April 16, 2014 Mr. Jeremy Hall Adero Canyon, LLC 13620 North Saguaro Boulevard, Suite 200 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268 RE: Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive Intersection Needs Assessment Dear Mr. Half 16255 ' ' JOSEPH F. 5PADAFINO. .1. The purposes of this assessment, which is presented in a format similar to that of a Technical Memorandum, are to address and document more formally the need for a traffic signal at the intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive now and in the future and to assess the need for a northbound left turn lane on Palisades Boulevard and south- and eastbound right turn lanes at the intersection. A vicinity map with aerial photograph is included as Attachment 1. Briefly, the conclusions documented in this assessment are that a traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive; that a northbound left turn lane should be provided with any future installation of the traffic signal; that no ether auxiliary turn lanes are warranted currently or in the future; that geometric conditions limiting sight lines warrant prohibition of right turns on red from the side streets and a protected left turn phase for Palisades Boulevard when a signal is installed; that, while a signal could be warranted when new development in Adero Canyon accessing Eagle Ridge Drive generates as few as 15% of its total expected trips, a level of service analysis revealed that the intersection could operate at an acceptable LOS C in both peak hours at least through 2030 as a four-way stop - controlled intersection; and that the additional 836 trips to be generated by Adero Canyon as now proposed will have little to no impact on the operation of Eagle Ridge Drive or on the recommended improvements to the intersection in either scope or timing. Background and Purpose A developer, Adero Canyon, LLC, is planning to begin developing its Adero Canyon residential subdivision that will be located in neighborhoods with access to Eagle Ridge Drive, which will be extended to the northwest from its current terminus at the entrance to the development. As part of the first phase of development, a public trailhead will be located fust beyond the far northwest corner of the development. Thus, in addition to site traffic for Adero Canyon there is expected to be vehicular traffic generated by the Town of Fountain Hills for the trailhead. The Adero Canyon property was previously known as Eagle Ridge North. Eagle Ridge North was a residential community planned with another community to the north, Eagle's Nest, on which development has begun. Originally shown as abutting and their roadway network's linked in a 1999 traffic study, by 2001 the two communities were separated and studied again. In the 2001 traffic report by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Eagle Ridge North was shown to provide 171 lots for single family detached dwelling units generating 1,698 trips daily, with 129 generated during the AM peak hour (32 in, 97 out) and 174 during the PM peak our (111 in, 63 out). The trailhead was also studied in 2001, with an estimated 239 trips daily, which CivTech, assuming there will be no overnight trips, will round to 240 trips, 120 in and 120 out. No hourly estimates for trailhead use were provided at that time. Ov'rech Inc. • 10605 North Hayden Road • Suite 140 • Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Office 480-659-4250 • fax 480-659-0566 Pa 6siadas Bob levard and Eagle Ridge Drive Inteimeicilion NeEics / ssicissimani Some changEis have been qnoqosed to the development chat are e1,nnently in the aggnoval Flnocess. An increase in density has been proposed to provic a alive mcuie single famiIN homes (a new total till 176) on smaller lois, 44 luxury) condom iniumcRownhomes, arec '120 resort h ctel nooms which co1, Ic k e afi iliatec with It a ad,jaaent CIoFIPIEMn rid Re:iort. CivIleal- updated a traffic study lion 'Il- El nevised land use plan zinc iss1, ec a report dated aril. aryl '16, 2CI14 that concluded That the Ac era Carryon c evelopmenf would genenate 0,534 inipls c ally, a net increase ail 836 trips per c ay even those anlieipalec from BaglE1 Ric ge Nor h , and an additional 364 trips wo1,1c be generated by oll-ens, a total of 2,898 Inips per day fan all anticipatEic development that will access Eagle Ridge Drive west of ils eyisting lenminus. Roac ways and Intersection Configuration Falisades Boulevard begins all Shea Bo1,levand anc loops northerly and easterly until it lenminates al Saguaro Boulevard. Ren N C 110111's Mlajor Roads and Strioels Plan ilMSRR;, Flalisades Boulevard is classified by 1:1- e Town as a minon arterial roadway. Sagle Ridge Drive t Eigins at Ralisac es Boulevard anc extEinds northweslenly appro) imately 0.84 miles, all til which is in it a City til r- eotlsdalEi eycept for the last neanly one-tenilh of a mile. Bagle Ric ge DnK a iritersecls Ralisac es Boulevard opposite Palorniino Boulevarc , which extends from Ralisades Boulevand southeasterly to saguaro Boulevard. Rer the M,RR, Ralomiric Bou levzirc is elassilliec as a maJan collector roadway. The short segment till existing Bagle Ric ge Drive is currently 1, ricilassified; however, Civlleah notes that its c esign ccrillonms to chat of a minor colleator ncacway aric it will be exlendec as such inta the Adero Canyon c evelopmeril. Eagle Ridge Dniv a has no homes with dinect access to it. Ralomirio Bou levarc c oes have homes with c irecl access. Both primarily serve, and will aoritin1,e 10 servie, rEisiceniial development. The inlenseclion cif Ralisades Boulevand and BaglE1 Ricge Dnive/Ralomirio Boulevand is pinesently ccrifig1, ned as a four-leggec intersection with stop-conAol on all four approach Els. Th El approach Els intersect at apprc) imately night angles. The ricrthbound Ralisac es 8 au levarc approach (south leg; is aorifig1, ned will- a sl-arec left) -l1, nn/ill- 1101,gl' lane, a ll- no1, gl' lane, arec an exel1, sive nigl- 1 turn lane. Alenial pt olognaplt y reveals l t al the mec ian on i h is leg riannows on ll- a west sic e, the opposite till wIlail might typically be e) Elected. ".E -Hp -striping" along it iric icailes ll- al it can servie as an acceleration lane for lrafilia turning fncm Palomino Boulevard onto Ralisac es Bou IEiv and so1, thbo1, ric . This northbound appimacl- is in a h cuiiacrilal au rvie to tt a right apprcaeh ing EaglEi Ridge Drive,IRalomino 8a1, levarc . 1111`0110 are k icycle lanes in bolt cirections and the speed limit on this approach is 45 mph. The south k ound apFpioaah Qnorth leg; is on a tangent section approach ing Eagle Ridge Dnive/Ralomino BO1,levarc. It is conficlurEic with an a)cl1,sive lefil Lunn lane, a 11`11a1,gh larie, and a sl- arec rigl-t-l1, nn/ll- nou g1` lane. There ane k icy ale lanes in both dineclions arec the speec limit tri this appircaeh is � 5 mph. The easlta1,ric Bagle Ridge Drive approach 11wEist leg; is on a langeril seclicn appiraaeh ing Ralisades Bau levarc . Il is configured with ari e) a)1, sive Ieffl lL nn lane anc a shaned night-turrOhrough larie. There ane k icy cle lanes in toil- cirections, witt ll- s eastbound bicycle lane terminating near w1` enc ll - a left torn storage k egins apipiroximateIN 109 feet tack fram the step bar. The spleed limit an ll- is appraaeh is 35 mph. PaclE12 oll 14 Flailiseidea Elouilevard aric Elagte Ridge Drive Inllerslecitiori Aleredsl Asseasmeriil an thEi miajon CitreEit EmiEmd dile maximum vabrriesi or eiactl of Mile agproglriate gradlh.i eEiscribEic above, vcilume;i roil cuniertlyflleEISEinil xi RiV;iaidew Bouteivard. Bei;ied cin IhEi Current jlEiveL;i ciftraiffic cin Fdisiades BawlEivard, Mei hiclhEin numbeirsi gaveirr. Arial sris: TWe resu,Va of the volurnEl-basted trafiki signal walrantsl analylsiis irldicaile PaLisaoes Elouilevard easuelyl exceeds Me rrlcjor strEIElil criteria for Wallant 1 (with currenil llrafficl volumes] wfli,le ilhe apploach volume fram eitfler the weallbound Paebrrlino Eloukivard apploach or Me easlllbound Eagile Ridge ElrivEl approach do rloll currenil,lyl meeil 11he Warranil SallisfAng 71rafi1c Volumes for Warramlls 1, 2, and 3. With rElfelence 110 Attachlmerll 4, ilhe atllachec anaJylsis prkiulout, ric111e Mail, of 11he eigflil highesil volume minor silleet approaches, five, incAuaing the tap foul, were from ilhe wesllbound Paelorrlino Elou/Elvard approach, an approaclfl tflall woWa clalry very Iitilki AdElro Caryon slille traffic in ilhe fuilure. Irl ilhe Elighttl flighest flour, both minor silleet appraciahes flad ari equal number of vefliciles approaclhirlg over 11he ilhreEl aa)ls. Ruture Need for a Traffic S ignal In or( er 11a assess 111' EI 11utL re need for a traffic signal, certain information muss t e carlsic erec . Amarlg 1reSO are the irlipls generated ty a Flrloplased developiment, how those trips arse gerlerlated ty 11 our of the c ay, and iherl how they are assigned la lr a irlterseciiorl appiroaches. Site 11rip Garlef`6111ion flak le 'el presElrlis the trips gerlElnatiorl calCL lations it ai werlEll sL mmarized in text of Civlleah's arlL aryl) '16, c1014 llrafilic S taten'100. They arse again prElElEirlied here in mare c Eltail to Ell- aw the peak hour iripl generations for We I'Mrs typically assaaiaiec wilt the acjaaent street irafilia (an hour t eiween 7 arlc 9 AM arlc art hOL r1 between 4 arlc 6 RM; and io show the peak trip- genera'lirlcl raL11 of each gerleraiarl on a typical wEIElkday marbling arlc afierinoorl. Table 2 — llrip Generation Calaulatiorls — Adello C arlvon Land Use Ccide 178 Land Lse P arae Quantity Units Daily Trips Generated Average Tc1n & Oulrlal ! 1/4 °I Rate I All Tris Haines 210 Single -Family Detached Housing -176 DL s' 9.52 1 1,676 € 838 1 66.1% Luxury Co dorniniuml 233 Luxury Condom inium/Tcwnhouse 44 DUs 5.86 l 258 1 129 i 10.2% Fesorl Hulel 330 Resort Hotel 120 Rams 5.00 1 600 300 23.7% Totals 2,534 1,267 1 100.0% Peak Hour cif Aaft ceir t Slilre ieill Tr ffic AM Peak Hour Land l se Avenage ; In ! Out Rate % In % Out PM Peak Hour In AvEirage , In Out I Ratei % In I % Out Tafal F arnot 0.75 33(25%)'l 99 (75%)!; 132 1.00 11.1 163% 65 (37%)l 176 Luxury CondominiumtTcwnhcuse 0.56 6(23%)l ; '1977% i 25 0.55 16(63%)' 9(37% 1 25 Rescirt Hotel 0.37 1 32 (72%)! 13 28% 79 0.49 1 25 (43%)Il 34 (57%)i 59 IIOTALEI 71 1131 1 202 152 1108 7 260 Peak Hour of Generator Land L s e AM Peiak F c iui Average In 1 Out Tcrlal Rates 1 % In 1% Out PM Peak Hour Average In C ul1 Rate % In % Out ofal Homes 0.77 l 35(26%)11 0 1 74"/� l 136 1.02 1115(64%)! 65(36%)! 180 LuxuryCondarniniUm/Tawnhatise 0.65 9(32%)l 2 68% 29 0.65 ' '17 (60%)l '12(40% 29 Rescirt H ate] 0.47 l 36(63%)! 2'I 37% 57 0.59 1 36(50%)! 36 50% l 72 TOTALS 1 80 142 222 168 111 281 'DL s = Dwelling L nils Table 1I presenis the trip gElrleraiiarl calcL lations for 'Eciottsdale MOL main BstalEls arlc far We llawrl's irlaO ead, wl' ich was consideiiec a "Slate RarH" 111118 L anc Use Code z 13) by Kimley- Horn stL dy, as presented in C ivllech's „aril.aryl irafilia statement. I11B's 7Ep Generation, the Page 71 cif '14 Flal6isade,cl Eloulevard ar d Elagllcl Ridge Drive ilnilerslecitioni NEledsl Assleslsmenii! SCIL rcle of t a avenage rates L sed to calcu late the trips, does not pro% is a weekc ay AM aric RN peak FCIL r average ralles for a Slate Rank, so CivllsciF used 1F0 menage AM and PM peak hour rales aric inirl dislnibuiicin (in/out; perclerdages for a COLniy Rank QCods 412) to generate the trips for the peak hOLIIS of acjaceni street traffic. Bates and trip dislnitOicin perclentages E18timaiec k y C i%TecF were usec lci clalclL laic Fleak F oL r snips for each generator; County Rark generaion inirl genenation rales ware neanly as higF as the daily rale for tF a Slate Rank aric were, ihereforEl, corisic erec L riacicleptable. CIVlIEICIF settled on rales 1Fal were appraAmately nine FlEInclent cif the daily rale ilon iF'e morning aric fifteen percent in 11 s afiennoon. 7kt Clistlrlibufion ana Assi-wr enf The Ac Gro C arty cin c e%slopmerii is a pinimanily a nesideritial c e%elopmenll with access Flnovided ty drily 9aclle Ric cle Dnive. Singe 1Fe proposec development clonsists of relic eniial, 1F a trip distrit Llith) Flaitern fan this assessment 8F cu Id aSSL me that the majoniiy Of tF a iri Fla genenated ty the relic enlial c evEIlOpmerii would be emplloy ment-rEilaisc . BmplOymGrii-relatec trips ane made by residents to emFlloy ment opporiuniiies wiiF in a giver) nac iu s of 1F a Si1E1—generally twelve miles—a typical CIOmmuiing distance in tF a Rhoenir M01ropoliiari area. liable 3 – Trip Generation Calc ulalliorls – Othe r Development and 11nailhead Land Usti Codec ITO Land Use. Narme Quanlily Units Daily Tris Generated Average , i % OI Total In 81 Out Rate All Trips FurrIEIS 2.10 Single -Family Detached Housing 11 DUs" 9.52 124 ; 62 34.'1°/a Trailhead 413 Slaio Park 367 Acres 0.65 i 240 1 1210 ! 65.9% halals ! 3E14 i 18.1 '100.0% Peak Hewn ofAdjacituntl Strect Traffic Land Use Average i Retie AM Peak Hour In Out /o In /o Out))kits) ° °Rate Average PM Peak Hour ' In Out % In ! ` (6/. out) Tcdeil Humes 1 0.7,1 1 3(25%)i 7(75%)! 10 1.00 € 8(63%)! 11(37%)! '13 llrailhead use County Park, Code 412 0.02 1 6(71%)l 2 29% ! 8 0.09 ! 1:1 35% 22 65% 34 TOlAL9 1 9 9 ! 18 20 217 47 Peak Has r all Gunevatlon Land Usei Aveiigei ; Ree a .` AM Peak Hour In Ou % In %Out lkilal Average , Rale, PM Peak Hour , In Out % In % Out) Ta1al Homes 0.77 3(26%)' 8(74%)! 11 9(641/.)! °I (36%)i 14 lnailhead 1 0.061 1(1(70%)l 7(30%)! 213 1 0.101 13 35% 24 (65%)i 37 TOTALS 1 19 1 15 1 34 1 22 1 29 °I'I 'DUs = ❑welling L niis;'Estimated nate. The peak Four trip disinik L titin Flenclentages ilor AC Gro C arty ori in liable 2 neflect that more nasiceriis will leave the c evelopmenll in lFG morriing, Fplesumably to go io work, than enian it, aric chat more would return to the development in 1Fe EINening than leave it, as 1F8y neturn home ilrom wonk. With no majon employment cleriters wiNri 'TE1 flown limits, one could assume that nasideriis leaving developments along Bagle fridge Drive and Ralomino Boulmard in 'TE1 morning woulc more likely iLnn to ga south on RalisacEls Boulezand because 1Fat leads to EFGa Boulm and, wF i& Iliacs to emFlloy ment cleriters OL aside of Fountain Hills. And, iriC GGC , 1 F E1 turning mo% ements necorded fail tF a two AIM peak F CIL ra confirm tF is, as c o the RM peak F OL us, wriciF ciclrlfinm it by demonairating a similar ciairibution Flaitern in neverse during the RM Fleak F CIL n. Table 4 Flnesents 11 a OL ik aL rlc east- aric wealt OL ric turn and through movements neclorded, 1F0 inbOL rid movements to Eagle Ric ge Drive, and the Flanclentages used to assign trips geriallaied by tF e full. ne development described above to the interslacltion. PE1clE1 fl oil '14 AEiiisiadesi BOUkivarc and Eagle fWdgEi EVVE1 lrlkirsEiciticin Needsi � sisEisisvnEint Table 4 - Minor Street Approach Turn Percentages, Outbourid and Inbound Approa of : Period Moverrient:1 I Eagle Ridge Drive Eastbou ric Palomino Boulavarc .Westbound Lefil i Tihru I Right ? Notal I Lefil I It rL Right Natal CIUTEICIUND Inibou rid 7atal Ink aunt Percentage Ran 'Tea 94 2 -Hou u AM Volu mesa (7-9 AM) _..._._...._.__._.....__....__._......_.........._...._....- -.._.......__....._..._......-........-........_.._.._ 2. Hou u A roach % 219 1 9 ..................._._._......_......._.__,_....._._._.—._._....- 34.'12 'I (1.59 4 71 89 — - - 95.29 i 718 121 1 ------ i......._........_........._... __....._.._.._..._ 97.78 8.E19 49 139 _._._.._._._._.._ :131.3131 AN Average Aroach % USEIC 34% 1'1% 59% i 1CIO °ra 58% 9% i 330r° 1CI00r° 2 -Hou n PM Volu mEisi (4 -EI PM)._............_...._.....37_.....i......._.__..._'12..._..----312 2 -Hou n Approach % 4 5.68 i 1� .81 -._._81_.. 39.9'1 --_3� _ 13 _._..._._.._314.......' 44.05 i 19.4 8 219 CL4 8 PN Average Aroach % USEIC 4E1% 190/0 39% 10001° 4°/ '15% 4'1°i° 1an, aEl 44 EIq 'IU EI.119% Approach: Period Moverrient:1 E1.43% Eagle Ridge Drive Westbound 0add NB Loft f WB Tlhru i SB Right Mob INEI C I UNE1 :171 '112 8.19% 69 2 -Hou n AM VC1lL rrlEls (7-9 A M) _...__.....- --...---..__..._...._..._......_..--._.._........._......._._......_........................__............_......_.._..._.._.._....._..- A N Average InbCIL rid °/ Used 3:1 43% 121 -- - -- -----.._._..----- '16°r° 3'I ----------------...._.__.._..._....--._.._..__..__..._.... 41% 7E1 1 CIOON 2-Hou n PM VC1lL rrlEls 4 -EI PM 68 i 13 21'1 I (121 PN AVEIIIEI a Int CIL rid % Used EI7°r° 13°ro 2(I% 1a0°r° Hourly Trip Variations A full tnafficl signal warranil analysis rElclu ires as many as Elighl hog IS ail inafilia aaL nis ilor a proper evaluation. Eloir Bagle RidgEl Dnive and Ralomino Elou levarc servie areas that ane residential in nature. Th EI proposed Pdero Canyon development is gElnemally nesiderliial in natL ne, as is "Icattsdale MDL Alain Esilates. Residential neigh borhoods have thein own Lrliqu e hourly trip varialians; that is, tl- EI t nafilic Elrltering arlc exiling tr EI neigh t am aac will vary ovElll 111-e caL ilse oil a ty piaal wEleH day. CivTlech develapElc a nesiderliial snip diS1111itClicin far 1FEi area around the study intElrsection by dividing the total nL mtEnl cif vehicles cou NEic approaching arlc the tonal c eparting BaglEl Ric de Drive and Palomino Boulevard curing EMC11' I'oLll o111rE1 day ty ll -e tulips Daunted enlening or departing tl-EI intersection for the eivenage 24-hour Fleiiioc. Tr E1 nesu Its of tris efilort is summarizec in Tlable 5, wr icil- prasenits Ire results ilor the eiclrl r iclr Elst Fours as used in 11•e inafilc signal warrant analysis stove and alive ac ditional hours that occu rrec t Elginninlg at 6 A M aric ending at 9 RM. Tatle 5 - HOL Fly Approaah Volum els Summary (6 AM to 9 PM) S1arl of Hat r Palorniria Bou le%arc WS Approach ES DE r art Clutk ouric Inib ou rid Eagle Ridge Wiwi E9 Appinaah 11 B Deparl Outbound Inbound Clutk ounc Tol al uric 7Perceontage Inibou rid 7atal Ink aunt Percentage Ran 'Tea 94 31 7"1 971 '12171 9.a8% 88 E1.43% I 04:dd E19 4,1 34 31a '1(13 1.9:1% 79 11.48% 21 081:dd E18 aEl 44 EIq 'IU EI.119% 88 E1.43% 31 0add 92 321 6a :171 '112 8.19% 69 5.04% 4 '14:49 44 68 54 �8 518 rV16% I'IEl E1.47% 9 '10:00 48 art 54 � a '1(121 T46% 64 4.89% EI '16:1,11 42 Ell 521 EIa 94 EL811% 1251 R42% 4 '11aCl 41 9E1 5a EIq 513 ELE10% I'IEl E1.47% 81 31:30 43 951 381 :171 EI'1 9.911% 96 7.01% 9 '1 /13Cl 315 4-A 4a 48 75 5.48% 99 E1.94% 'I Cl ICI:qCI 214 21 34 21a 98 4.214% 431 &14% '11 18:30 27 30 ala 319 49 31.9E1% 69 �.-45% '10 06:131C1 215 331 181 161 1 43 31.14% 49 :1.58% '13I 24 -hour 1 atals 1 -1,368 1,369 PagEi 9 of 14 Pali& dEis Bau,leve rd and Ee g,le Ridge Drive JntEiamicdon NeEIC s / SSEissmEinll Site Dip Assipnrr enl. 1 ince, as a primanily nesidential c e%elopmElrii, Adero Cariyon will liable 6 — Hourly Approach to similar in ciranaatElr to the c evelopment Volumes S urr rr ary IjEI AM to 9 RMI that cleneraies the traffic on Bagle Ridge at Full Build -Out as Rro osed Chive aric Palomino Bai.levarc, 11 -EI rlencentages c Euli%ec in Tlat le 9 cart t e apipiliec io ire total site inipis gerienated by Adero Canyon to eslimatEl a sitEl 111irl distribu Tian pori the carnesgoric ing houns of the day and L sed in an analysis. The only excElpiiciris ane trEI foun houns lion which inirls gerienation nates ane a%ailable in ire ITB comrlElric ium, Thi'pl GEV EIMIIIiorl. For 11'Else fO(r 1-01.11 11-e trip generalions for ire AM and PIM rleak 1-01.118 Of tr EI generaion (development; was incllL c EIC in addiiiciri io those of the rlElak holies till adjacent street traffic. The same Haas done lion Sccittsdale MCI retain Ranch and ilor the trailhead ill- is Start of Haur Adero CIUROUrid C anyori Percentage Dutbcidrid ISctsdl Mtn Eitates t 7nailhead Tckil Cluttouric 11:0(1 11:66 142 17 159 14:49 '14:4,11 1 '13 14 1121(1 (18:0(1 oaaa '131 19 114E1 16:19 'I EI:'19 1(18 13 12111 (19:0(1 EIA E1% 1(14 19 11151 10:0cl 71.46% 519 14 1651 12:(10 ELM% 871 13 1cia NAM 71.5c1% SISI 14 111(1 13::ICI 9.92 % aEl 1'1 8a 17:30 9.48% 70 10 80 210:0cl 4,14% % 114 8 62 lUICI 3.58% SEI 7 9:1 (16:(16 3.'14 % 2 a 6 4E1 214•hciui 1,267 '1 E12 11,4451 outt of rid site trip distrait tion is si mm�uiiaed 'N aluas c� Iculated using equations tram Trig Generation, Yh Edition. in Table (I. A total cif 1,449 outbound inipls i, -;i expectElc eaah c ay. Tbilal Approach Volumes. The expectElc hourly outbound/easibO(.ric iriFls from 'he Adero Canycin c e%EIIOpmElni, 'Eciottsdale MOL n'ain Ranch-, and 1:1-e inailf ead at full t (ild-out ai various stages Of acimplation mime then ac c ed 1ci 1he e)isting Eagle Ric ge ❑rivEI %cllumEls; tris yialc ed Ira arlrinaacih volumes io to L. sec: in the warrant arialysis.' Iciricia the aprinoaah volumes ai fl. 11 build-O(.t Qshown in Atiac hment 5) c is satislly ire warranliricl ariteria, Civllecir's next siert was to estimate all what stage of comFlleiicin or aaciurlariciy tr EI c evEllOpmenil wai.IC be genenating ElLfflicient trips to warrant 'he'rafllia signal. This yieldElc f0ure rO(.nly WILmes Qrounded io the nearest 9 vehicles) io be considerer for the signal wanrant. Table 7— FIL1ure Warranil Analysis Analysis. The minimum wiainiant Volumes (Highest 8 tours)) satisllying %al( es in Table 1 are Start cif Hour Eagle Ric ge BlElExIsting All New Developmend Outbound Warrant 1B Minor Sdneet 70 v h 29% Warrand 7 Mirior StreEd EIO v h 15% 11:66 713 '11171 1119 1 g '14:4,11 94 1 � 21 1 ocl 8(1 oaaa 44 1 9 9(1 'I EI:'19 921 ,1:19 99 8(1 09:6(1 Elo 11118 99 EN Jam 9� 1(19 9a 12:00 52 (I(1 89 ou:6(I 3k '1(1,9 7CI at least 70 vehicles peri rol.11 for eigr1 1-01.113 for Warrani 1, Condi'icin B, and at least 80 vehicles rlElr hour for four houns for Warrarii 2. CINTe& assumec tf ai it EI exis'ing eastt a( nc volumes on Eagle Ric ge Drive woulc remain arlrlra)imately 1:1-e same and lrari Elstimaied the percentages rill trips 'hat MIOLIC be required of the de�elcirlment in ciiidall to meed tr eEiEl minimums. As few as '15% oll the trips MICIL Id satisfy Wanrant 2, the Four- Hac r Wanrant, anc 39% woulc satisily Warrani 18. Wiih a total of 1,449 outbound snips a)placitec A sirmidar eyercicie wait ciorduckm kir w6uAtlounc Palamiro Parkway with dile aindiciipated r umber aAintlounc Acero Canpr drips. The westbaur c Radormiro Bou le6and aFproach wEursind valurnia Aas la&, Than dile wisAllourd valcirrie. Far Plis reason, thEi ckidcu lalior:i ere rad F1119SEirnlec hengir. Page 10 of 'Iz Flad,,iadeEi Elouiev and eir d ElagIEi Flidge Drive unlersiecitior Needa A McSISmEI/llt eacf day, just ire inirls gereraied b� ire luxuryl ccndos proposed ilon Adeno Canyon arc trEi Tlown's trailhead Ila total of 249 outbound trips; ooLlc saiisf� ai least one irafilic signal warmant iI,'lz9j1,449=1-A%`,. Table a applies these rlEmcentages tc lra fLII tLild-out fourly vcilumEis anc ac cis tf em lc exisiling vols mesio sr CIMI tr Ei waiirant satisllyirg values. Alssu ming the Ac ero C any an FpiojEicit gels underway in 2015 and is built out over a rlEuiicc cif Eli) cir seven yeaiis ilan estimated compileiicin date oil 2022;, crEi cif We signal warrants COL Id be meal mill -in a year of ITT start of new home ccrstruciior. However, as will be demonsiiiatEic below, r ciwER en, C i%Tech c ciEis not cionsic er sail isfying eitr er on both cif 1r ase warrants ilo be ccincdL si%e rlracif tr ai a traffic signal sr ou Id be installed. Beilorie that c isciL ssion, se%oral ciheii issu es musil t e addiiessed. Northbound Left T L rn Auxiliary Lane on Ralisaides Boulevard As rioted atciv e, the rcrthbound arlrlroach oil Flalisaces Boulevarc to Bagle Ridge Drive/Ralcmiro Boulevand ciU nnently rpiovic es lr reEi lanes, a shared lefil-lL rrutr rcu gh lane, a it noLgl- lane, anc an exclusive right iunn lane. The cu rreri fcu r•way silo) efibCiively prohit its vehicles iliiom traveling through We irite rsection at the speed limit. S L oh tr rcu gh movements will t e allowed cin a gneen ligri when a traffic signal is installed. Flor chis reason, ii is recommendec that a nortf bound lefil turn lane be ccnsirucied ilc coincide with the insiallaiicin anc opeiiation of a irafilic signal. Sou1H- and Bastbourid FligHt Turn Auxiliary Laries Chapter 6 till the Maiiicorla County ❑epartment of-Warsrlcrtation QW CDOTf Roadway Design Manual IIR❑M) is c ec icaiec lc tr a i rite rseciti on till public rciac wads. In We R❑M, a ric 1 iunn auxiliary) lane is mianianied wr en right tL rn vcdu mes e) ciesc 300 iunns peri r CIL r, such as at a major urban intersection. Such a iL,nn lane lakes nigrt turn movements 00.1 cif the stream cif tr rcLdf inafilic. This impro%as the overall operation of the irieiiseclion fon twc reasons: 1; nigrt tL rring vehicles m1.st slaw in orc er to turn, slowing trailing lr nciL gr vehicles and 21' it iiedLCes the volumEi of irafilic in the lrnoLgr lane. At inierseciions of reavily--traveled major arterial nciacmiays tr M operate ell pooii levels of service during peak hours, such auxiliary) lanes can provide e)tra capaciily That err antes operation. With reileiierce to Table 7, We rleak hoLnly aprpioach volume anticipated on Bagle Ridge Drive easitoLrc is about .130 % Ell' icles per tour (73+'l57=.130) 1lon all mci%ements. Since 111- is is well below 1r El MCDOT ihresr old far 6gri iLiins, a nigrt iLnr auxiliary lace is rci warraried on Eagle Ridge ❑rive aprinoaching Palisades Bogy le%anc . And, as clan be seen in Attachm enil 5, tr e sciLlhtoL nc rigrt turn movemeri is alsc well under 300 %&icles pen hour. Georm citric C onsideirallions AI fielc review of ITT clecimetric cianciiions till trEi intersection revealed that tcih Palisades 9cL levan arlrinoaches lo Bagle Ridge Drives Palomino Bou levard approacf an hoiiizontal cis rues and on an L rlr ill grade limiting sight distance. -91`898 conditions are not an issL e L nder tl• e CLrnert all -way stop control since ireiie is ria irafilic moving straight 11`1101-gl• We irierseciior in ani diiiection M1i1roLt stopping. Hawe%en, CivTlecr is concerned 1rai there may not be sLfficiert sight cisiance fail dnivers inlerc ing to turn right on nec ilnom #e side strEieis to see approaching vehicles on Ralisac es Bogy le%and or far c rivers irienc ing to tL rn lefil from Flalisades Boulmaiid io see cirlrlcsing er isles. Tlr enefore, if and M11' en a irafilia signal is installed, we recicmmend Anon it icing right aurins on lied for tre east- and westbound arlrlrcaeres and we recommerc prciectec-oily leftl- iurin phasing for the lefil turns in t cth c ireciiors fiiom Ralisac es Boulevard. Page 'I'I of 'Iz Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge give Intersection Needs Assessment Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented above: * The total traffic expected from the Adero Canyon development (2,834 trips per day) represent under 8% [2,534(30,110+2,998)=7.7%] of the total traffic through the intersection using the current traffic volumes from all four legs. Using projected 2030 traffic volumes totaling almost 45,000 vpd, the Adero Canyon development would contribute an even smaller percentage, 5.6% of the volume through the intersection. ® A traffic signal is not currently warranted at the intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Eagle Ridge Drive/Palomino Boulevard. The warranting criterion for Warrant 2 for a future traffic signal could be satisfied with as few as fifteen percent of the trips generated by the development of Adero Canyon, A northbound left turn auxiliary lane on Palisades Boulevard should be provided with installation of the traffic signal. It is not needed before. 4 No right turn auxiliary lanes, either eastbound on Eagle Ridge Drive approaching Palisades Boulevard or southbound on Palisades Boulevard approaching Eagle Ridge Drive, are warranted, with or without the installation of a traffic signal and regardless of any generated by Adero Canyon, whether under the original or revised site plan.. e Geometric conditions limit visibility such that, if a traffic signal is installed, the Town should prohibit right turns on red from both side street approaches and provide protected -only left turn phasing for north- and southbound traffic on Palisades Boulevard. • While the warranting criterion for Warrant 2 would be met with as few as fifteen percent of the trips generated by Adero Canyon added to the existing traffic volumes on Eagle Ridge Drive, the intersection capacity analysis revealed that the intersection could Operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS C) in both peak hours at least through 2030 as a four-way stop -controlled intersection, even with full build -out of Adero Canyon. This gives the Town some discretion and some time to determine when they would install the signal. • The additional 836 trips to be generated by Adero Canyon will have no impact on the operation of Eagle Ridge Drive or the recommended improvements to the intersection in either scope or timing. We look forward to your consideration and approval of this analysis. If you have any further questions or comments or you wish to discuss this analysis further, please contact CivTech at (480) 859-4250. Sincerely, CivTeeh Joseph F. Spadafino, PE, PTOE Project Manager/Senior Traffic Engineer JFS.Ifs 0 Attachments (7) 1 ] Vicinity Map 2) Traffic Counts 3) MUTCD Figures 4) Signal Warrant Analysis Sheet 5) 2021 & 2030 Turning Movements 6) Growth Rate Calculations 7) Synchro, Worksheets %llnlniiVrolrEsV3i0fU]If0•.4�rrvfwymrnunlayfli�s�Sihnlla�lr5ii �fi3lOfOrairilik, ISNllcc Page 14 of 14 APPENDIX/GI r 2018 PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS CivTech HCM 2010 TWSC 1: 'Eagle Ridge Dr & Coppenvyerd Or 2715+2a17 fibrin — IntCeiay,sAoeh 1 P(crar�Ni_— - f1Ll —WBL WBT wm w - WV $61 SYT VIII, vewh 7 4 T1 8 3 27 Contketing Peds, AV 0 0 0 0 a a Sgoconhai Slap Sias Free Free Free Free RTCharmr¢ed - Norm - Hone - rsnrP 51-ge L -.A 0 PatC2,p-1 Mare.-rer 976 976 110 Veh in Madan Slow, t 0 - a - - a Grade, % 0 - 6 - hksre - a Peak HpurF Cs 9-3 99 90 90 96 90 1-pmyWWes, :; 2 2 2 2 2 2 PAm[Fkrp 8 4 79 9 3 34 Awmh N9 n — NewiGarWL1".s 9 C 3 HCM LOS A Iyie r�F — Wii NBRNSL n1` 651- SST Capam Iveluhl 939 1598 HCM Lane ViC Ratio D.013 O.D02 KMGarrmlDelay W - - 9 74 - HCM Lame LCA A A PCM 55th title C1,rehl 0 0 Cnprerm rd ReW Z114017 201 B 8ack9und AM Sy=hm 8 Report CNTeO Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest EldSummit Dr North 211`5,2917 Int Delay, s.Wh 1 1 Nl&e M -- —WBL WBT wm Mlaiorf �- CorlactNFlaw fill 120 83 0 0 88 6 stage 1 83 - 1 4 5tage 2 37 - - Cri4ca? d" 6.42 6.22 412 Cry Hdry Sig 5 SA2 - 0 Cr 1tr?#ry Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Fo,; -up HdAy 3.518 3.31E - - 2218 - PatC2,p-1 Mare.-rer 976 976 IN8 RNP 1 949 5.52 N61r Slage 2 985 Folb-p Hday - Ptataon lucked. m - - hksre Swage Length M v Caul Maneuver 874 976 1`508 Mw Cap4 Ma Lrmr 874 156.2 - - 115 Stage 1 No 918 D Stage 2 983 0 Awmh N9 n — NewiGarWL1".s 9 C 3 HCM LOS A Iyie r�F — Wii NBRNSL n1` 651- SST Capam Iveluhl 939 1598 HCM Lane ViC Ratio D.013 O.D02 KMGarrmlDelay W - - 9 74 - HCM Lame LCA A A PCM 55th title C1,rehl 0 0 Cnprerm rd ReW Z114017 201 B 8ack9und AM Sy=hm 8 Report CNTeO Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest EldSummit Dr North 211`5,2917 Int Delay, s.Wh 1 1 Nl&e M ImL -OT EER —WBL WBT wm NA ml HER 98L SM' SM VOL vehrh 5 0 6 1 1 4 4 12 1 1 41 D ConlWog Pedes &hr D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 SrIgrnCoollol Shop Shop Sbrp Skop Syrp Stop Free Free Free Free Free Fret RTCham ed 5.52 N61r - - Nume Folb-p Hday - None - - hksre Swage Length - PotCap-I Wneovs 936 753 1023 834 125 - 156.2 - - 115 Stage 1 Veh in Median Strnacje. N 918 D 0 0 915 826 - 965 9 Grade, % 9 Nib" tilodued fir' 0 0 - 0 peak HourFarypr 90 9D 90 90 % 90 50 90 90 90 90 9D "Vehi?ps, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 My" Fkww 6 D 0 1 1 4 4 Rn 1 1 4f a ConMdffg Flow All 14D 138 46 137 137 81 46 0 0 $t 0 a Stage 1 0 4B 89 89 Stage 2 92 90 48 48 Cftai F&Y 712 6.52 6.22 7.52 6.52 6.22 4 12 :.12 CnbralHdwyStgl 6.12 5.52 - 612 552 - - CritiralHdwySlg2 612 5,52 - 6-12 5.52 - - - - - - Folb-p Hday 3.516 4.918 3.316 3.516 4.01`9 3.318 2.218 2-218 PotCap-I Wneovs 936 753 1023 834 754 979 156.2 - - 151] - - Stage 1 985 855 - 918 927 - Stage 2 915 826 - 965 055 Nib" tilodued fir' MovCap-1 Maneuver 8.23 751 1023 832 752 979 1982 1517 I Mov Cap2Maremer 623 751 - 832 752 - Stage 1 963 854 916 61g stage 2 9a7 818 954 654 - __-_ 'tel ts HCM Cer=aol Delay, s 94 9 0.4 6.2 RCM LOS A d Capa*iveW 1562 623 007 1517 HCM Lane Vic Rft 0.003 a.Da7 O.W 0.001 HCM Comte Delay(s) 7.3 9.4 9 7-4 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM R!O `Al-- G(vehl 0 0 9 0 CcpprrwyrdResod 2f142o172018BadvgrtlwdAM Synd4io-8Repo cWech paq 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit dr Saukh 2 I5ri017 fan IN delay, s'.eh 12 16dwrl" - - -EB 'Mr -Mt -MUVW- 141 VW- FiOL N97 NO SOL SST SSR VOL *1191 0 51 6 1 74 0 1 0 9 16 0 0 Con" Poets, Whr 0 0 0 9 0 G D 9 0 D 0 0 Sian Coatid Free Free Fin Fee Free Free Stop Slap a0y Smp Shop Slop RTChawreea 612 . None &12 5.52 stone Fvlpw-upH&y Nine 2218 3.518 r4nn- Sbrage 100 3.318 Poi C, -q-1 Marzuwsr 1515 1511 629 759 19A B29 7% 478 Veh in MAadianStorage, # - - - 555 847 924 825 0.100 Stage 2 _ 2 2 Cr, °% - 0 847 a PLMM Llocwd. % - 0 2 MvntFksx 0 Peak HourFaaar 90 90 50 90 00 90 9D 90 90 9D 90 90 F4oa y veNclw % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 hAmtFknv 0 57 9 k 82 0 1 4- 0 M 0 0 qRrl"w Canl6c rroo Floc Al 82 0 0 57 0 0 141 141 57 141 Al 82. Std I - - - 57 57 84 84 EB Stage 2 84 84 57 57 - Cab aHday 4.12 412 712 6.5Z 6.22 T12 6.52 6.22 CriSraLHMySig 1 - 6-1.2 5.52 8.12 5.52 - CtaHdxySt42 - Wgr 612 552 &12 5.52 - Fvlpw-upH&y 2218 2218 3.518 4.018 3318 3,518 4-018 3.318 Poi C, -q-1 Marzuwsr 1515 1511 629 759 19A B29 7% 478 Stage 1 - - - 555 847 924 825 0.100 Stage 2 _ 2 2 NA 625 5155 847 2 PLMM Llocwd. % - 2 2 MvntFksx 0 94 1 33 4SowCapl Marauder 1515 - - 1547 - - 628 749 1OD9 626 748 978 Mow Cap -2 Mane w 0 - BM 144 - 628 749 0 SLMe 1 9 2 95.5 847 - 924 624 0% Stage 2 CP..; rDD% 923 824 - 955; 647 Vol Tlaru,% TSB' - HCM Conlnl De!ay, s 0 G.1 9,4 94 HULDS A A, I�mar t*dR ROLM E3L EST EW `VSL WBT V'kSKn Capacity (VEER) 828 1515 - - 1547 - - B29 HCM Lome VIGPalq O.D01 . OXI - - 0.021 HCOACmMIDelayo) 9A 0 - 7.3 0 - 94 HCMLaneLDS A A A A A HCM95th WeQv0e 0 0 0 - 01 Coppwirynd Remd 2114r2317 201$ BXi70W AM S)ixtw g l?epon ciwTeoh Page 3 HGM 2010 AINSC 4; Palisades Blvd 8 Eaq le Ride Dr.+Palomino Blvd 115017 Coppranrynd Resort V140172D188adcgm" AM SoMa 8 Report CWT" page 4 _ 1f18 NB ------T M3 t*r5ecti7a'o fir. sheh 2.4.8 EB _ S9 Opposing Lanes 2 Intafsedivi LOS D 2 3 C.mkbMApWrwhLeO sa EBV EBL- ABT ' - Wgr W SR 1i1Ell i 'NM VOL wehln 0 17 1 39 0 36 3 23 D 45 2-M 5 Peak Hour ractor 9,90 0.50 0.90 9.90 0-90 1) 4D 9.90 0 90 0-90 0.98' 0.58 0.100 wavy Vetn*s, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvntFksx 0 94 1 33 0 40 3 26 D 59 310 6 Hlvr#arotLanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 9 2 1 Coppranrynd Resort V140172D188adcgm" AM SoMa 8 Report CWT" page 4 1f18 NB opposing Appoach M3 EB _ S9 Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 C.mkbMApWrwhLeO sa NB EB Con" Lanes Left 3 3 2 Cunfkbrig A aoh Righl me SB WO COAKdng Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Cor4roi De ley 11.1 91.5 136 HCM L06 S B B Lac - - NOW NOW *6 1- E8Cn9-EB n2 V.SLn1 wElnz -SOG11 7S8R--9r'{ Vol Let '% 33% D% 0% 1MI CP..; rDD% 0% 10% UA' 0% Vol Tlaru,% $7% 10n 6% 0% 3% 0% 12m 9% 1DOA, *.42% Vol Right % 0% D. 100% 0% 97% 0% 88% n 0% 8% SFPC04W Siop Stop Slop Slop Sbp Slop Skop Sop Step SW TwrcvakryLam 138 186 5 17 39 36 26 $ 519 283 LT Vol 45 �D 0 17 9 36 0 8 0 0 Through Vol 93 186 0 D 1 0 3 0 519 260 RTVot 0 0 5 0 30 0 23 0 0 23 Laf*Flaw gza.- 153 207 6 19 34 40 29 9 577 314 G-netry Grp 8 8 8 B 8 8 B a 8 8 Degree ofllti(Xj 9.301 0396 0.01 0.045 9.07 0-094 O.D59 0016 0.463 0.519 DepatmeHeaclraa}ri A 7.09 6.893 6,187 8.513 7.377 8.446 7.32 6.512 &ON 5.95.1 Ca WRIence.. YR4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cab 508 S21 576 419 486 422 486 549 690 603 Serwe isne 8.825 4.661 3,955 6.003 5117 6234 5.108 4.265 3.762 3.705 KIM Lana VJC Rabb 0.301 IL397 D.01 0.045 0.07 0-D95 0.06 0.016 0.982 0.521 HC14CoaWDeley 129 14.2 9 11-7 1D-7 121 10.$ 9.4 5224 15 HEM Lam LOS B B A B B 8 B A F S HCM 95Lh jie 0 1.3 1.9 0 0-1 0-2 0.3 0.2 0 13.3 3 Coppranrynd Resort V140172D188adcgm" AM SoMa 8 Report CWT" page 4 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Fidge DdPalcwnino Blvd a115M Appmanh _- Opmw4 Apf7rox. 188 Opposing Lanes 1nlarsecton Delay,, slmh Confiding Approach Let wn Confictng Lanes Left lntersenion LOS Confk tng Appmac2 RqN EB ConFaetng Lanes Right 2 1,CM Control Delay 309 39L 6131 ;MR Vel, wrehfi 0 8 773 23 Peak liar Fa:w 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 "a" VeN les. % 2 2 2 2 tivmiFow 0 9 6% 26 uuq&roiLanes 0 1 2 0 Appmanh _- Opmw4 Apf7rox. 188 Opposing Lanes 3 Confiding Approach Let wn Confictng Lanes Left 2 Confk tng Appmac2 RqN EB ConFaetng Lanes Right 2 1,CM Control Delay 309 HCM LOS E Coppmwyn,d Rasw 711 df2417 241613ackgmund AM senchro 8 Report CiJwft page 5 HCM 2410 Signalized Inlers,eetion Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Sled 21OUNT l i -"' 'r .- � 4\ t I•` � 4 .1 WAW-�� 01.-'M7 M VM WET WBR NRL E4131= IW -SHL -MMC Lary Cmfigurakcs 11� Itt P ) tft il '1 k ) 4 r� Vokane w Alj 265 446 7 1 947 55 12 10 12 76 4 616 Number 7 4 14 3 8 t8 5 2 12 16 16 lydl Q Pbl. vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-BkeAj%A-pbl} 1.00 100 100 1.04 1.00 1.04 1;00 1.00 Paddm Bus, Adj 1,60 1-00 1,40 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1..00 1.00 1.00 T-00 Adj U Flour, velu%ln 1863 1853 1863 1663 1853 1863 1*3 1663 1 °00 1863 1863 1W Adj Fbw Rape, vehfi 294 496 8 1 t097 61 13 11 13 87 4 907 Adj Nb. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 91 1 1 2 Peg Vow Factor 0-90 0.50 0.99 0.90 0.90 4.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Isamy Veh. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap. Vehh 379 2167 675 2 1613 572 22 273 323 630 713 1373 Amine Cn Gnen 0.111 DA3 043 000 032 0.32 0.01 0.35 0.35 0,04 0.38 038 Sal Flow. we" 3142 5085 1503 1774 5005 1583 1774 774 92t 1774 1863 21P Grp VofurnelV],waWh 294 496 6 1 1097 61 13 0 24 87 4 907 Grp Sat F1ox]s],vahftbI721 1695 1563 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 17M 1774 1853 13" OServe(rys} s 7.5 5.6 0.3 0.1 16.3 23 0.7 00 OS 28 0.1 22.0 COO 0Ckaig_cj, s 7.5 5.6 0.3 0.1 16.3 23 0.7 0.0 aS 2.8 0.1 220 prop In Lane 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 054 1,:00 1.04 Lane Cxp Cap(c), v2 A 379 2167 675 2 1613 572 22 0 596 630 713 1373 VC Ratto(1{j 0.76 0.23 0.01 0.51 0.68 0-11 0.59 0.00 0:(l,4 0.14 0.01 0.65 AvaiCaO(a_a}.v" 535 2373 739 116 1921 669 118 0 596 630 713 1373 HCM F0.staan ldaha 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 LWrewrFiter(f] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1011 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Umifo;rnNlayldp.slw_h39.0 16.4 44,9 44.4 266 191 44.2 0.0 19.2 16.8 17.2 11.2 1nrrlDelay{d2}.s.N& 4.6 0.1 00 1.216 0.8 0.1 23.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0:0 2,5 in"OCeWd3j,s&vN 0.0 0.0 0.0 D0 0-0 0.0 40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %-& 3ackOg5O%j,veid58.8 2.6 al 0.1 6.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.4 1.3 0.1 8:9 L9C9F 36MOV*h 436 t6.5 14.9 173.5 275 192 87.3 00 19A 169 17.2 197 LnGrp LOS D B 113 F C B E B B B R Appmach Vol, Yelu'A 7% 1t99 37 998 Approach De". sWh AS 27.2 36.2 19.4 Approach LOS C C d 6 �nnee 1 2 3� 5 E 7 iR T - Assgned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs RurAm (G*Y*Rc], s&0 35.6 4.1 423 5.1 38.4 13.9 32.5 Charge Period (Y-Rc], s 4.0 4.0 4,0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Selling (Gma4-O 220 60 420 6.0 20,0 14.0 34..1) Max (3ClearTime{g_*H1}.& 26 Z1 7.6 27 24.0 9.5 18.9 Green Ext T"e jp_c], s 0.0 4,2 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 9.6 - - HCM20t4CLdlietey 24.5 HCM 2010 LCS C Coppevwynd Resod 211412017 2016 Background AM Spnchro 8 Report CTMTech paw 7 HCM 2014 TW'SC S: EagW Ridge DR & Driveway A 2f1512017 IN Delay, sheh 2 M, Cilnt6r" Flaw Al - Wm ��91T 'ski' I '_SATmM vnl ,mhti 24 D 16 — 59 D 6 Umfk; ng Peds. alar 0 0 0 0 D D 'W coarct Step Slop Free Free Free Free RTCharmelzzed 5.42 None Hann - Nom Sbrage LengO a 2238 Pot cap l Mar LW 80 ` Veh im, Medw Storage- t it Stage 1 0 D Cka&. % 0 - a D Peak HcmrFaelcr 90 30 90 90 90 90 HaRgVehdm% 2 2 2 2 2 2 WnU Fbw 27 D 18 66 0 7 M, Cilnt6r" Flaw Al 59 51 0 0 83 0 stage 1 51 - - - `.nage 2 7 - - cri3calmn 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 crild118 nslgl 5.42 - - - - - crfficmHdwySig 2 5.42 - - - - - Foilar-upW" 155 3.31E 2238 Pot cap l Mar LW 949 1017 1514 Stage 1 571 - - Siagge, 2.� 10th - - L Veh siMeddian Sto,Weii - 0 4mCap- IManeuver 945 1017 1584 "Cap-Namomr 445 4 stage 971 PeakNnurFaaar Stage 2 1016 9D 90 we —Rg— -- -IN HCM Gor4Moeliy.s 99 0 0 [cm LOS A �l4mt Fffi1' 7T = � �1 Caps ey 1veluh� 949 1514 8CM Laru='RC R io 0.428 - HCM GN*Dl Delay (sp &9 D H"M Lane LOS A A HCM 951hVile 0()ehl 0.1 D Capperw Md Ret§od V14017 201613adtground AM SynGxo 8 Repod NTectr Page HGM 2010 TWSC 7: Gopperwynd Dr & Driveway B 2(1i 01; Mt Delay. s W h 27 ild,eirienl T W8R Sm` SER Vol, veldh 7 4 10 0 0 1 Canlfit'*rg Peds. ARW D 0 0 0 0 0 Sgn Cm'hW Free Free Free Free &Op Sick RT ChanrwtQed Num None - Wre Slangs Length 0 Veh siMeddian Sto,Weii - 0 0 - 0 - C{ade, s 4 0 - 0 PeakNnurFaaar 90 90 9D 90 90 90 4"Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 WrY, Flow & 4 11 0 0 1 f�ali]r Magri --—MAi calldvrg Fbw a 11 0 0 31 11 sta" 1 i 1 slage 2 20 CrccalPdwy 4.12 642 6.2Z Crstal Hdwy Sda 1 5.42 CroniHiwy Sit 542 FoFoN-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.51E 3.318 PotCa):-i Maemer IC+36 983 1070 Singe 1 1012 - stage 2 1003 - Ptabon blocked. % Mev Cap- 1 Maneuver IW - - 978 1070 Mrae'CaR-2 Manewes - - - - 41E - S1age 1 1012 Slage 2 998 HCMConbW u f!ay, s 46 0 8.4 HCM LOS A MinaLaneiTilio WVA EEL EBT—V'WP rT cmWitylvo'bi 1E08 - - - 1470 HCM Lase IdX Rft 0.005 0.001 HCM ConhV 3e1ay (s! 72 0 SA HCU Lase LOG A A - A HCU95[hWe13(,ehl 0 - 0 CapperwymdResor VW201720180ackgrarmdAM SynG.hsu6IFep d CIVTe.h Page 10 HCM 2010 T-WSC 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Copperwynd Dr 2FW417 irhersedn - Ini Cre!a:' s:V'"r I.r. P r[t Vi BL WHR taT 1m —SBE W — -- VaLvehnr 12 - - 89 33 13 4 0 C4nBc&V Peri Wor C. 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Corrlml Slop Sorg Frew. Free Free free RT Channebed - None -Nme Stnp - 1,1 Sbrage t englh 0 Free Free Free FIT Channelized 110 Veh m Wdkm Storage, ii 0 F4} se 0 Nue D Cxade, *. 0 - 0 - 4 Peak Kmr Faslor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vetoes. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MrntFioae t3 8 37 14 4 44 M*Wliic 0 _ Mori — 1�apr7 — _ Can15c6NFbwA[ 9T 44 0 0 51 0 1 44 - 2 2 - - Sage 2 53 2 2 2 Muret Flaw - Crfra)4ldwj 6.42 5.22 3 52 1 412 Cn5-,A HdwyS41 5.42 Miorf-- � - CrfaallldryStg2 542 Folk -W it" 3.516 3-319 123 122 2 218 Piotcap-1 ManeLw 942 1626 - - 1555 - Stage 1 978 - 69 59 - _ - slage 2 97D - - - - - puk m 4bcked, % CrbcA Hdwy MmCap- IMare!ner 900 1026 7.12 6.52 612 4.12 t555 Mow Cap4 Mwomr 980 - - - - - SIa2e 1 978 - - - - - CQcal Hdwy Slg 2 Stage 2 w - 6.12 5.52 MCMCono-d1k94y.1 $.9 0. 6,7 KM LOG A awtioQwma Capadily (vehh) 943 1555 HCMLar* V1CRalio 0.422 coal — - Hcmconh-sDelay [5] - - 89 7.3 - HCMtameLDG A A- ICM9Jr°d+eQl+e41 D1 D Cq"myWRewn W401725186ackyvoendPM Syrchra8Repar1 Civiech Page 1 HCIV 2010 TWSSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest DrfSSurnmit De North 2r15120t7 Int Delay. skeh 0.7 Il er+t --EBL r Y10}T--w ABT— -f im WL -S8T Sm Vef, vehrn 3 0 0 a a 3 3 47 1 0 55 2 Conffxtng Peds, � hr a 0 0 a a a 0 0 D a 0 0 SgnControl Star Slnp Stnp Skop SfCO Sim Free Free free Free Free Free FIT Channelized None F4} se Nue - Ww* SwageLOO O - 125 - - 115 Veh m Median Storage. 9 0 0 - D 0 Grade. % 0 a _ 0 0 peak HOW Fade 0+3 90 94 90 :43 90 90 90 95 90 90 9D Heavy Ve*Jes. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Muret Flaw 3 D 0 a 0 3 3 52 1 0 61 2 `r Miorf-- � POW Cenliicho Fhw r4 123 122 62 1.21 122 53 v3 5 a 53 4 4 i fit 62 - 69 59 - _ Stage 2 61 60 - 62 63 CrbcA Hdwy T_12 652 8.22 7.12 6.52 612 4.12 4.12 Crl al Hd*,Y% 1 Ix 12 6S2 - 8-12 552 - - - - - - - CQcal Hdwy Slg 2 612 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Fdb-egHdwy 3.518 4.015 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.316 2.216 2218 - Pot Cap lManerrver 852 768 1803 854 768 1014 t544 1553 - stage 1 949 843 953 846 - - SIa3e 2 950 845 949 842 PbkKm blocked. Mo-rcaplManemaer 846 767 1803 853 767 1D14 1548 1553 Mar Calp-2Mane rver B46 767 - 853 767 Stage 1 -W 843 951 844 Staw 2 945 643 949 642 Fcm Control belay, s 9.3 8.6 ll_4 0 19CM LOS A A Capacity (-K"lrl 1545 B46 ID14 1553 KM Lane VC Ratio O.DO2 x.504 6.053 - KM CC�ftl De-Eay Is) 7..3' - - 9.3 8.6 0 - WM Lara LOS A A A A ]ICM 45th °joule- Qlvehl a' - - 0 0 0 - - CcVl:ewff4Resart V14017201BBaskgmurrdPM ayrdrro9Repod OvTea Page 2 HCM 2014 TWSC 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Surnmif Dr South 2n5017 Ind Dozy. MmM 1.1 `.-- `9L'tBT EM 5W'eL -WM-WW- MBT MM SSL SRT SBR Vd 6oA 1 66 1 0 46 22 0 0 1 16 0 1 cw fir" Peds. Awr 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S* word Frereee FFree Free free Fm- ftp Stop Swp Sp S" ��,,0 S" RT C tr reke.i - - ;lane W nq 4.12 - None 6.52 None Siarage LR -A l00 - - &12 5.:52 - Veh in Wefm Storage. C 0 0 - - - Q 5.52 0 orale. % 0 0 2.216 D 4.018 0 Peak Hour FadDr 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heaq VA des. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 N" Flow 1 73 1 0 53 24 0 0 1 !9 n 1 I4yp-� - -- ---IEg - - - - HCM Contr N Delay- s 0.1 0 8 5 9.4 HC.hi LCIS A A M'mar�MiariE NSDA Lo EST- t WEL WaT %%M&-- Capacity (-KIN 998 1526 -1526 833 HCM Lam WC Me 0.001 0.001 - 0.023 HCMCo("DftIs) 86 1.4 0 9.4 HCC Lore Los A A A - A l4cm95M-A-L-of eh} 0 0 0 01 Cmemmyrd%sect 114M7XIBBamwdPW Symlwo8Reput CiuTech Page 3 HCM 2014 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Ea le Ride GdPelornim Blvd VISM 17 Ma' r1 M ' Miiotf - _1 C,Dn oVFWAL 78 0 0 74 0 0 142 154 74 143 143 66 S1aP 1 - - - -. - . 75 76 - 66 66 - 2 - - 65 79 1 77 77 - Cr;bca HdAy 4.12 - - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 8.22 7-12 6-52 6.21 Card Huy Sg1 - - &12 5.:52 - 512 ,5-52 - cnksHuy Sg2 - - - - - - 5112 5.52 - 5.12 552 - Fk -upmd" 2218 2.216 3.518 4.018 3.318 3,518 4.019 3.318 RotCap-1 Maneoner 1520 - - 152E - - 11"16 738 968 826 749 946 1 2 2 633 932 2 945 B40 S" 2 0 34 7 36 945 830 4 902 634 Pkrbon blocked. % - - rofLanes 0 1 $ 0 0 MwCap-1Mwoeoaer 15211 1526 827 738 488 615 749 9'36 Mw Cap -2 Ma1eil er - 827 738 825 749 Stage 1 KKK -N8 n3- 932 831 WHLni 914 610 age 2 SSIn`2 1 Vol Lek LeR % 944 830 0% 930 830 I4yp-� - -- ---IEg - - - - HCM Contr N Delay- s 0.1 0 8 5 9.4 HC.hi LCIS A A M'mar�MiariE NSDA Lo EST- t WEL WaT %%M&-- Capacity (-KIN 998 1526 -1526 833 HCM Lam WC Me 0.001 0.001 - 0.023 HCMCo("DftIs) 86 1.4 0 9.4 HCC Lore Los A A A - A l4cm95M-A-L-of eh} 0 0 0 01 Cmemmyrd%sect 114M7XIBBamwdPW Symlwo8Reput CiuTech Page 3 HCM 2014 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Ea le Ride GdPelornim Blvd VISM 17 _w;iAi - - - - - - -- In1e smtion Delay, :lveh 23.2 549 ES _- latersecwn LOS C ilpposHV Lanes 2 2 - E$[i' E13EE�If-'SBR YOUA3L�PG SB X13 hill NB7`F!! VOLV" 0 31 6 32 0 21 4 16 0 14 689 37 Peak HourFwhw 0.40 6.40 0.90 4.90 0.90 0.90 O.gl 0.90 0.90 (.9D 0.90 0.90 Heartyveh6 .Ik 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 W nt Flaw 0 34 7 36 0 23 4 13 0 21 766 41 rofLanes 0 1 $ 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 _w;iAi - - - - - - -- - - oFP-en9 ApppDach 549 ES SB ilpposHV Lanes 2 2 3 Coftbri Apwwo Leff SB No E9 Con;sting Lanes LeR 3 3 2 Coruldng Appva;a Riol. Na Se W6 Con5cbN Lanes Right 3 3 2 NCM UTtol petal 11.5 11.4 29.3 KKK -N8 n3- EIRW SBEn2 WHLni Wf3Ln2 Wailes SSIn`2 1 Vol Lek LeR % 3'.4 0% 0% 10091 0% 101)% 0°6 1 Dr% A 0% Vol Ttuu.% 12% 1-90% 0% 0% 16% 0% 20% 0% 100% 87% Vol Rgkl• % 0% CI% 700% 0% 84X 0% 80% I 0% 13% stnconhal slop Shap Slap Slap Slop `gip Stop SSW Slap Stop TraftVeil tyLaoe 249 459 37 31 38 21 2.0 12 257 147 LT Vol 19 0 0 31 0 21 4 $2 0 a Tl,"h Vol 230 459 0 0 5 0 4 0 257 128 RTVd 0 0 37 0 32 0 16 0 0 13 Lace Fkw Rake 275 510 41 34 42 23 22 13 285 164 G--hy Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8. 8 8 Degree of UN (iq 0.46 0.981 0.063 0 082 0 067 11057 0.047 0.027 0.539 0.305 Depa46seHeah-y(Hd) 6.252 6214 5.509 8542 7-445 8-761 7,852 7.312 8.808 6.717 Cwwrgerrc. YI11 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 575 582 647 417 478 411 468 488 528 532 Seale Time 4.013 3.975 3.269 6.341 5.243 6.461 $ 392 SAN 4.582 4.491 HCU Lme Vt Rabo 0.48 0.876 0.063 0.082 '0-068 8.056 0347 0.027 0.54 0.308 HM ContrW DHaI 14.7 39.8 8.6 t2.1 11 12 10.8 103 17.3 12-4 HCMI L LOS S E A 'B E B B 19 C B HCM 95th4k 0 26 10.1 02 0.3 0.3 0.2 111 0.1 3-2 1.3 Cow- Rears 2i14rA 17 2018 Backgrdand PM Synehm 8 Retlort CrvTmh Pajo 4 HCM 2010 AWSO 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrJPalomino Blvd 2rl5r2017 Ir?rs?donDnlay sah IMemedian LOS 11ti eieem_ SBU SEI. 'W 5617 _ Ved. ve n 0 12 385 19 Peak Hour FacW 0.90 09e 0.90 0.v0 HaavpVeikim.°: 2 2 2 2 MvrntFkra D 13 4 r 21 Nhmberdffxr�as 0 + 2 0 Ad11+1'e� - SB ---m --- - Oppo" AppDach Na Oxwrs Lanes 3 Comfli ngAwDacb1e0 4113 Conk"Lare. Lek 2 Con 15c11gAWo-hRgM E9 Con%tilg Lanes Rek 2 HCMCan&dI)eiey 15.4 HCM LOS C Copperw d Resod 211412017 2019 Background PAI WTeo'h Synchrtr 8 Repan) Page 5 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades BW 21152017 t, -.4--'I, -'�tf-1.4-' EE 'k ms EITFF WK-W8T-WW-WNRR SBL M T SOR- LaneConsgurations 4'f# r ft} r I H I } eF volume{vemlj 696 1295 15 4 620 7i 21 3 3 48 7 371 Stint" 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 f6 1mm g cob). veh 4 0 0 6 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Ped -U" hJJ{A.pb7} 1.63 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.09 1-00 Park7ng M. Audi 1.06 1.00 1.00 9.06 1.06 1.49 1.06 1.60 1.40 1.00 1.00 00 All Sat Finw, *"qn 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1663 1863 1863 1900 1863 1803 1963 A j Fk w Rate, veO 773 1438 17 4 6'89 86 23 3 3 S3 8 412 Ary N0. of Lams 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 PeakHrwrFador 0.99 0.90 1190 R90 0.90 0.96 0.90 0.9t1 O.w1 0.90 0:90 0.90 PearenI144avyVeh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veluh 83.4 2392 745 8 1179 419 34 270 270 577 611, 1591 Amore On Green 0.24 0.47 0.47 004 023 0.23 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.43 0.33 0M SafFlow, veNb 3442 5085 1563 1774 M 1543 1774 850 856 1774 1853 2767 Grp Volnrne(vj.veroh 773 1436 17 4 699 86 23 0 6 53 8 412 Grp SRtfbKsj,veNh%t721 1695 15M 1774 1695 1583 1174 0 1712 1774 1863 1393 OSerae(g_sl. s 19.7 188 0.5 0.2 10-8 3-5 1.2 0.0 0-2 1.8 0.3 6.7 Cyde0CWgg_c},s 19.7 160 0.5 0.2 10.8 3.8 12 0.0 02 1.8 D3 6.7 Prp In Lane 1.00 1.67 140 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.06 1.90 Lane Grp Cap(cf- veh% 835 2392 '+45 8 1119 419 34 0 $39 577 Eli 1591 VlC Rabo(X) 0.93 0.56 0.02 0.53 0.58 621 0.67 0.06 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.26 ALYACap(c a),veWh 841 2392 745 296 18118 .615 79 0 539 558 611 1591 HEM PfaloonRab 1.06 1.06 1.D0 1.00 144 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 100 1.D0 1.69 Ups"am f4erifJ 1A0 4.011 100 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 0.06 1.06 1.D0 1:00 1.00 Uwfam4elay{d�.s6Rh33-1 17.0 728 44.7 30.7 25.7 43.6 0.0 21.2 19.7 20.4 4.7 inn nelayr M iNuh 15.8 DA 00 48.1 0.5 0.2 19.9 0.0 0.0 11 0.0 0.4 Irr GOe111sAd3j,sdreb 0-0 D_0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 08 00 00 '0.0 00 '.idle BackO[a150"%j.veh4d.2 8-9 01 02 5.1 f.7 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 26 Lr GrpCklay[di.swear 491 16.0 12,8 92.9 31.2 26,0 43.6 0.0 21-2 f°8 2D-4 10.1 L" LOS D & 13 F C C E C B C B ApproxhVol,+elcli 2228 779 29 473 AWma Delay, sNeh 28.8 330.9 V10 IIA Avveach LOS C C D B Assigned % I 2 3 4 3 6 7 Ptrs Dwake P Y+Rc} s6.9 323 4.4 46.3 5.7 33.5 25.8 24.9 Change Perbd IY+Ri*. s.44 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4:0 Mm Green Setbrg{f b 16.0 15.0 39-0 4.0 16.4 22.0 32.0 Mir O C arTnne (g_c4q.& 22 22 20,8 3.2 8.7 21.7 12.0 Green Ed Tune(p-Q,s 0.0 1.5 0.0 14.0 0.0 1.1 OA 8.0 HC412010 Ch1 Delay 27.1 HCU 2010 LOS C Commy W Resat L14ft017 2018 Bac4nxard PM Syrdhro 0 Report CiuTech Pau-_ 7 14CM 2010 TWSC 5: Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A 2d15>2017 Prriersedicm - Ird De[s;. s weh d.3 Mm rfie it Vh'BL WOR RBB N3R SBT Volvebh 41 0 2 38 0 3 Cwfk;5 g Petis AIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 5gn Corrtial sbp 'Shm Free Free Free Free IST Channebed - None - idose - None SWYA L -O 0 - Folbrrur Hdwy 817 Vehin manim s4oraw. 9 0 PetCap-f mam?rarer 1 U Bade, g 0 - 1 D Peak Haut Fador 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehidm % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mni1 Flaw 46 0 2 42 0 3 f::CM Ccxrml Qefay. s �8 8 0 Km LCIS A - WwrLaned111a;rJr Wm NBT NNSM 'I SIX SBT cap-* 1-1130 Wil - - M aK Coe 16etng Flow A9 26 23 1 0 44 0 stage 1 23 - - - - Staw 2 3 - - - CrifKalHdwy 6A2 622 4-12 CrtscaI PAW stg 1 5.42 - _ - Crbml FNwy SN 2 5.42 - - - - - Folbrrur Hdwy 3518 3.318 - - 2.218 - PetCap-f mam?rarer 9B9 109 - -- 1554 - stage f 1100 - .slage 7 1121 - - - - - Plalmro d9drd. %- ti cxade. % ltaw Cap -1 WanwmF 989 lw 1554 MN Cap 2 Maneum 989 Pe* t3aw Fater - - - stage t 1101 9D 90 Staff 7 1420 2 2 f::CM Ccxrml Qefay. s �8 8 0 Km LCIS A - WwrLaned111a;rJr Wm NBT NNSM 'I SIX SBT cap-* 1-1130 - - 989 158: - HCM Lane )RC Rib O.D46 - KM Corrbal Nay (s) B.B 0 HCM Lane LOS - A A KM"%lik ftwehl 0.1 1 Cappm;-p rd Resort V14017 201E Badrgmtwd PU Sjrem 8 Report CieTed Page 9 HCM 2O10 TWSC T Copperwyndl Dr & Driveway B 205017 Mt Oelay. S.\eh lk%V +^.M EBL EBT WBT 4rTsp, T _ M— --w - -- --wi_ Floe. weh.6 7 10 8 D 0 11 Con0 %no Peds. 04hr 0 b 0 0 0 0 SignCML-d Free Free Free Free Smp Slap RT Channerao - Neste - Bone - [Jpsre Sbrage L U Veh n Median S^tbrage_ 4 0 0 ti cxade. % D 0 4 Pe* t3aw Fater 90 9D 90 9D 90 90 Hem? Vehcfes, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MwM Flaw B 11 9 0 9 12 MaW- h1o�i CmEctno Fbw.-9 9 0 - 0 36 o Stage 1 - 9 - stap 2 27 - Crkal Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Cr1A21 H* Slg 1 - 5.42 Crural Hdwy 2 - - - - 5.42 - F* -upH%y 2.21.6 3.518 3.3T6 Pat Cap. IWannerdner 1611 977 1073 Stage 1 - 1014 - — — stage 2 PtaleonFrWed, % phyca('Imaneuver 1611 972 1073 Mmreap-2Ua mw - - 972 - sta3e 1 1014 stage 2 961 - --- - SB HCMCan0 Delays a 0 8A HC3d MS A �GnaiLa itiMid EBL EBT W87 W®R 1 — Cap -Ay N19tm) 1611 - - - 1073 HCAt Lite V1C Ratio GLW5 x.011 HCUContrel0eby(sl 7.2 8 - - 9.4 HCU Lane LOS A A A HCM 95M °',,able C(wehl a - 0 Copperwynd Resal 711480 1 7 20 1 6 Bx*grouad pM Sy-hna 8 RepW rAwTectt Page 10 HCM2O1DTVVSC 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & CopperwXndD006/017 Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Minor Lune8NaiorNvod NBT NBRVV8Ln1 SBL SBT Capacity (voh1h) ' ' 833 1457 ' HCN LonoV/C Ratio 0,021 0.002 ' HCMControl Delay (s) Lane Configurations 7.5 ' HCM Lane LOS ' ' A A ' HCM0Sth %tileO(voh) t Traffic Vol, voh/h 12 4 101 15 3 48 Future Vol, veh/h 12 4 101 15 3 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr D O 0 8 O 8 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RTChoono|izod ' Nona ' None ' None Storage Length U ' ' ' 110 ' Vohin Median Storage, # 0 ' O ' - D Grade, % O - O - ' O Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 QO 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvm(Rmv 13 4 112 17 3 84 Conflicting Flow All 182 121 0 O 129 O Stage 121 ' ' ' - Stage 81 ' ' ' ' ' Critical Hdwy 6.42 822 ' ' 4.12 ' Critical Hdwy Sto1 5.42 - - ' Critical Hdwy Stg2 5,42 ' - - ' ' Follow-upHdwy 3,518 3.318 ' ' 2.218 ' Pot Coo4Maneuver 807 830 ' 1457 ' Stage 904 - - ' Stage 982 - - ' ' ' Platoon blocked, 9& MovCap-1Maneuver 805 830 ' ' 1457 ' MovCap-2 Maneuver 805 ' ' ' - - Stage 904 Stage 960Aplajoach ' W13 HCMControl Delay, o 94 U OA HCMLO3 A Minor Lune8NaiorNvod NBT NBRVV8Ln1 SBL SBT Capacity (voh1h) ' ' 833 1457 ' HCN LonoV/C Ratio 0,021 0.002 ' HCMControl Delay (s) 8.4 7.5 ' HCM Lane LOS ' ' A A ' HCM0Sth %tileO(voh) 0.1 O ' CoppmnmyndReuoh(17-0211) O2/14/2O17208Total AN Gynuhm8Report HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest Dr/Summit Dr North 03106/2017 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 2 Conflicting Flow All 211 209 76 Int Delay, sfveh 0.8 209 122 76 0 0 122 0 0 Stage 1 78 78 - 131 131 - - - - - - - Stage 2 133 131 - 78 78 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 Lane Configurations 7.12 4+ 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 ',T - 6.12 5.52 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 0 1 1 4 4 109 1 1 68 0 Future Vol, vehlh 5 0 0 1 1 4 4 109 1 1 68 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Mone - 740 None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - 686 - 125 - - 115 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 0 0 1 1 4 4 121 1 1 76 0 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 2 Conflicting Flow All 211 209 76 209 209 122 76 0 0 122 0 0 Stage 1 78 78 - 131 131 - - - - - - - Stage 2 133 131 - 78 78 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 - - PotCap-1 Maneuver 746 688 985 748 688 929 1523 - - 1465 - - Stage1 931 830 - 873 788 - - - - - Stage 2 870 788 - 931 830 - - - _ - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 740 686 985 746 686 929 1523 - 1465 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 740 686 - 746 686 - - - - Stage 1 929 829 - 871 786 - - - - Stage 2 862 786 - 930 829 - Approach E8 VVB NB S8 HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 9.3 0.3 0.1 HCM LOS A A Capacity (vehfh) 1523 - - 740 845 1465 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.003 - - 0.008 0:008 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 9.9 9.3 7.5 - HCM Lane LCIS A - - A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3. Eagle Ridge Lir & Summit Dr South 0310612017 int Delay, slveh 0.9 Lane Configurations I T - 1509 - 743 T4 0.001 - - 41- Conflicting Flaw All 123 0 43, 213 Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 78 0 1 111 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 78 0 1 111 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None 3.518 4,018 Mone - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - - - - - - - 878 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 743 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 87 0 1 123 0 1 0 0 18 0 0 BB 1NB NB Sia Y: HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.9 10 HCM LOS A B Capacity (vehlh) 743 1464 - - 1509 - 743 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.001 Conflicting Flaw All 123 0 0 87 0 0 213 213 87 213 213 123 Stage - - - - - - 87 87 - 126 126 - Stage 2 - - - 126 126 - 87 87 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4,018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1464 - - 1509 - - 744 684 971 744 684 928 Stage - - - 921 823 - 878 792 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 878 792 - 921 823 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1464 - - 1509 - - 743 683 971 743 683 928 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 743 683 - 743 683 - Stage 1 - - - - - 921 823 - 878 791 - Stage 2 - - 877 791 - 921 823 - BB 1NB NB Sia Y: HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 9.9 10 HCM LOS A B Capacity (vehlh) 743 1464 - - 1509 - 743 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.001 0.024 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 0 - - 7.4 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 0211412017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd 0310612017 Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Leff Intersection Delay, slveh 33.8 2 Conflicting Approach Right IVB SB WS Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Control Delay 11.6 Intersection LOS D HCM LOS B B B 0% 0% 100% 0% 98% 0% 88% e c e - -- Sign Control Stop Stop Stop - - aft, c -80A Lane Configurations Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 171 186 5 ' 55 36 26 8 a ? Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 20 1 54 0 36 3 23 0 78 279 5 Future Vol, vehlh 0 20 1 54 0 36 3 23 0 78 279 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 22 1 60 0 40 3 26 0 87 310 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Leff 3 3 2 Conflicting Approach Right IVB SB WS Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Control Delay 11.6 11.8 14.6 HCM LOS B B B Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/1412017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 4 ~ Vol Left, %© 46% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 54% 100% 0% 0% 2% 0% 12% 0% 100% 91% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 98% 0% 88% 0% 0% 9% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 171 186 5 20 55 36 26 8 519 287 LT Vol 78 0 0 20 0 36 0 8 0 0 Through Vol 93 186 0 0 1 0 3 0 519 260 RT Vol 0 0 5 0 54 0 23 0 0 27 Lane Flow Rate 190 207 6 22 61 40 29 9 577 319 Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree of Util (X) 0.386 0.407 0.01 0.054 0.127 0.097 0.061 0.017 1.002 0.547 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.315 7.085 6.377 8.801 7,603 8.844 7.715 6.756 6.252 6.185 Convergence, Y1N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 488 504 557 409 474 408 467 527 577 580 Service Time 5.104 4.873 4.166 6.501 5.303 6.544 5.415 4.528 4.024 3.957 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.389 0.411 0.011 0.054 0.129 0.098 0.062 0.017 1 0.55 HCM Control Delay 14.7 14.7 9.2 12 11.4 12.5 10.9 9.6 62.9 16.3 HCM Lane LOS B B A B B B B A F C HCM 95th -tile Q 1.8 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 14.7 3.3 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/1412017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 4 HCM2O1DAWSC 4 Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd 03180/2017 Intersection Delay, m/veh Intersection LOS Opposing Approach N8 Opposing Lanes 3 Conflicting Approach Left M0 Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Traffic Vol, veh/h O 8 778 27 Future Vol, veh/h D 8 778 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.00 O�QO 8.08 U8 Heavy Vehicles, 94 2 2 2 2 MvmtF|u* O 9 888 30 Number nyLanes U 1 3 O Opposing Approach N8 Opposing Lanes 3 Conflicting Approach Left M0 Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCW Control Delay 46 HCWLO8 E CopponwyndResort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchm8Report HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 0310612017 _-* -► -,r 4,- '" *-_ 4N t /* 1* l 41 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 0211412017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 6 Lane Configurations )11'�'�'� �°'�' '� '� re Traffic Volume (vehlh) 284 446 7 1 987 70 12 10 12 89 4 830 Future Volume (vehlh) 284 446 7 1 987 70 12 10 12 89 4 830 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ad) Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 316 496 8 1 1097 78 13 11 13 99 4 922 Adj No. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 400 2200 685 2 1615 573 22 268 317 621 701 1372 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.43 0,43 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,vehlh 3442 5085 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 779 921 1774 1863 2787 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 316 496 8 1 1097 78 13 0 24 99 4 922 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh1ln1721 1695 1583 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 1700 1774 1863 1393 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 5.5 0.3 0.1 16.9 3,0 0.7 0.0 0.8 3.2 0.1 22.6 Cycle Q Clear(g-c), s 8.0 5,5 0.3 0.1 16.9 3.0 0.7 0.0 0.8 3.2 0.1 22.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1:00 0.54 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 400 2200 685 2 1615 573 22 0 585 621 701 1372 VIC Ratio(X) 0.79 0.23 0.01 0.51 0.68 0.14 0.59 0.00 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 535 2373 739 118 1921 669 118 0 585 621 701 1372 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 38.7 16.0 14.6 44.9 26.7 19.3 44.2 0.0 19.6 17.3 17.6 17.3 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 5.7 0.1 0.0 128.6 0.8 0.1 23.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.6 Initial Q Deiay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/Dile BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir4.1 2.6 0.1 0.1 8.0 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.4 1,6 0.1 9.2 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.4 16.1 14.6 173.5 27.5 19.4 67.3 0.0 19.8 17.4 17.6 20.0 LnGrp LOS D B B F C B E B B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 820 1176 37 1025 Approach Delay, slveh 27.0 27.1 36,5 19.7 Approach LOS C C D B - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7� 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 35.0 4.1 42.9 5.1 37.8 14.5 32.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4,0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax4,a 22.0 6.0 42.0 6.0 20.0 14.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c+ 115,2; 2.8 2.1 7.5 2.7 24.6 10.0 18.9 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 4.3 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 9.7 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 2.4.7 HCM 2010 LOS C Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 0211412017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 6 HCM 2010 TWSC 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A 0310612017 Cb*I- -zjW- Int Delay, slveh 2.7 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 7 Lane Configurationsr Traffic Vol, vehlh 46 0 16 89 0 6 Future Vol, vehlh 46 0 16 89 0 6 Conflicting Peds, #lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None -Alone Storage Length 0 80 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %A 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 0 18 99 0 7 NO sm Conflicting Flow All 74 67 0 0 117 0 Stage 1 67 - - - - - Stage 2 7 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 _ _ _ _ Fallow -up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 930 997 - - 1471 - Stage 1 956 - - - - - Stage 2 1016 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %fl ' Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 930 997 - - 1471 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 930 - - - Stage 1 956 - - - - Stage 2 1016 - - Q -Approach VdB - NB HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor LanefMajpr Mvmt NBT NBR1NBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (vehlh) - - 930 1471 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.055 - HCM Control Delay {s} - - 9.1 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - A A HCM 95th %stile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 - Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CivTech Page 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 7: Copperwynd Dr & Driveway B 0310612017 Int Delay, slveh 4.4 Capacity (veh/h) 1608 - - - 1070 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - Lane Configurations HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - - 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 4 10 0 0 6 Future Vol, veh/h 14 4 10 0 0 6 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 Veh in Mercian Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 16 4 11 0 0 7 1 __ . i-- - W40a - -- - - -- Conflicting Flaw All 11 0 - 0 47 11 Stage 1 - - - - 11 - Stage 2 _ _ _ 36 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 1318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1608 - 963 1070 Stage 1 - - 1012 - Stage 2 - - - 986 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1608 - - 953 1070 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 953 - Stage 1 - - 1012 - Stage 2 - - 976 - HCM Control Delay, s 5.6 0 8.4 HCM LOS A Capacity (veh/h) 1608 - - - 1070 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - - 0.006 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - - 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - _ 0 Copperwynd Resort (17-0211) 02/14/2017 2018 Total AM Synchro 8 Report CiJech Page 8 2418 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Copperwynd Dr HCM 2010 TWSC Int Delay, s/veh 1,5 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh Future Vol, vehlh Conflicting Peds, #!hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow WBL W'Btt NBT NBR Y 19 7 19 7 0 0 Stop Stop None 61 20 61 20 0 0 Free Free - done 4 69 4 69 0 0 Free Free - None 0 - - - 110 - 0 - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 - - - 0 90 90 90 90 90 90 2 2 2 2 2 2 21 8 68 22 4 77 Major/Minor Minorl - Ma'or1 Major2 _ Conflicting Flow All 165 79 0 0 90 0 Stage 1 79 - - - - - Stage 2 86 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Utical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Foilow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 826 981 - - 1505 - Stage 1 944 - - - - Stage 2 937 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 824 981 - - 1505 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 824 - - - - - Stage 1 944 - - - - Stage 2 935 - - - Approach UVB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.3 0 0.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Mayor Mvmt NBT NBRVVBLn1 SBL SB_T Capacity (vehlh) - 861 1505 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.034 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 7.4 - HCM Lane LOS - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310712017 Page 1 2018 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 2. Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest Dr/Summit Dr North HCM 2010 TVNSC CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310712017 Page 2 Conflicting Flow All 202 201 Int Delay, s}veh 0.4 200 201 92 103 0 0 92 0 0 Stage 1 102 102 - 98 ME ` z EBL EBT EBR WBL 1NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SS Lane Configurations Critical Hdwy c+ 6.52 6.22 44 7.12 6.52 1j 4.12 - - 4.12 - - �T, 6.12 Traffic Vol, vehfh 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 82 1 0 91 2 Future Vol, vehfh 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 82 1 0 91 2 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - - 125 - - 115 - 1503 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 812 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 91 1 0 101 2 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310712017 Page 2 Conflicting Flow All 202 201 102 200 201 92 103 0 0 92 0 0 Stage 1 102 102 - 98 98 - - - - - - - Stage 2 100 99 - 102 103 - - - _ _ - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - _ - _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6,12 5.52 - - - _ - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 756 695 953 759 695 965 1489 - - 1503 - - Stage1 904 811 - 908 814 - - - - - Stage 2 906 813 - 904 810 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 752 694 953 758 694 965 1489 - 1503 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 752 694 - 758 694 - - - _ Stage 1 902 811 906 812 - - - - - Stage 2 901 811 904 810 Approach EB WB NB --- —; - . HCM Control Delay. s 9.8 8.7 0.3 0 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvint NBL NBT NBR E6Ln1WB1_n1 SBL SBT SSR Capacity (vehlh) 1489 752 965 1503 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.002 - 0.004 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 9.8 8.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th °Mile 0(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310712017 Page 2 2018 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations - 221 - % 104 Stage 1 1� - - 116 4 - 104 4 - Traffic Vol, vehlh 1 102 1 0 83 22 0 0 1 16 0 1 Future Vol, vehlh 1 102 1 0 83 22 0 0 1 16 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 888 799 - Platoon blocked, % - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 678 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 113 1 0 92 24 0 0 1 18 0 1 f 939 1471 - 744 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.001 0.001 - 0.025 Conflicting Flow All 117 0 0 - 0 2210 233 114 221 221 104 Stage 1 - - - - - 116 116 - 104 104 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 105 117 - 117 117 - Critical Hdwy 4,12 - - - - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 612 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1471 - 0 - - 735 667 939 735 678 951 Stage 1 - 0 - - 889 800 - 902 809 - Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 901 799 - 888 799 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1471 - - - - - 734 667 939 734 678 951 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 734 667 - 734 678 - Stage 1 - - - - 888 799 - 901 809 - Stage 2 - - 900 799 - 886 798 - pp ouch EB WS NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 8.8 10 HCM LDS A B Minor LanegMaior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR VVBT VVBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 939 1471 - 744 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.001 0.001 - 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 7.4 - 10 HCM Lane LDS A A - B HCM 95th % ile Q(veh) 0 0 - 0.1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03107/2017 Page 3 2018 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 4; Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 AWSC Intersection Delay, slveh 25.7 Intersection LOS Q CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0712017 Page 4 7C E 19 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 35 6 64 0 21 4 16 0 51 689 37 Future Vol, vehfh 0 35 6 64 0 21 4 16 0 51 689 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 39 7 71 0 23 4 18 0 57 766 41 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 --- Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Control Delay 12.1 11.8 33.2 HCM LOS 8 B D _ _ WAI W -04:199 -MAW Vol Left, % 18% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 82% 100% 0% 0% 9% 0% 20% 0% 100% 85% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 91% 0% 80% 0% 0% 15% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 281 459 37 35 70 21 20 12 257 151 LT Vol 51 0 0 35 0 21 0 12 0 0 Through Vol 230 459 0 0 6 0 4 0 257 128 RT Vol 0 0 37 0 64 0 16 0 0 23 Lane Flow Rate 312 510 41 39 78 23 22 13 285 168 Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree of Util (X) 0.565 0.911 0,065 0.095 0.165 0.059 0.049 0.028 0.569 0.33 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.624 6.532 5.825 8.808 7.658 9.088 8.015 7.685 7.179 7.071 Convergence, YIN Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 549 556 619 408 471 396 448 469 505 511 Service Time 4.324 4.232 3.525 6.525 5.375 6.809 5.736 5.385 4.879 4.771 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.568 0.917 0.066 0.096 0.166 0.058 9.049 0.028 0.564 0.329 HCM Control Delay 17.6 44.7 8.9 12.4 11.9 12.4 11.1 10.6 18.9 13.2 HCM Lane LOS C E A B B B B B C B HCM 95th -tile Q 3,5 11 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 3.5 1.4 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0712017 Page 4 2018 Total PM CoDpenwYnd Resort 4' [»8[iS8deS Blvd & Eagle RidDr/Palomino Blvd HCM2O1QAVVSC Intersection Intersection Delay, okmh Intersection LOS We t" SBU SBL SBT SBIR VV8 Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Traffic Vol, veh/h O 12 385 23 Future Vol, vah/h D 12 305 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.00 0.90 8.90 0.80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 MvmtF|mv 0 13 428 28 Number ofLanes O 1 2 O Opposing Approach N8 Opposing Lanes 3 CunMicUngApproach Left VV8 Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCMControl Delay 18.8 HCMLD8 C CiJouh Synchm8Report 2O18Total PM Copp Resort 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary * --1' -� �- *-- 4 4� : / � v� t^ Y ~y . r � - � - CivTech 8ynom8Report Lane Configurations T+ Traffic Volume (vah/h) 714 1284 15 4 820 91 21 3 3 82 7 388 Future Volume (vah1h) 714 1294 15 4 820 81 21 3 3 82 7 380 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 S 2 12 1 8 10 Initial O(0b).veh O O O U O 8 O 8 O 8 O O Ped-Bike/dj(kpbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.80 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 180 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h8n 1883 1883 1883 1883 1883 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1883 AdjFlow Rate, veh/h 733 1438 17 4 889 101 23 3 3 89 8 432 AdjNo. ofLanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0�90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0�90 0.90 0.90 0�90 0�90 0.90 Percent HmoxyVah 9& 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cop.veh/h 841 2398 747 8 1177 430 34 282 282 578 809 1592 Arrive OnGreen 0.24 0A7 0,47 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, voWh 3442 5085 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 858 866 1774 1883 2787 Grp Vo|umo(v).veh/h 793 1438 17 4 889 101 23 U O 89 8 432 Grp Sat F|m*(u).wuh/h/|n1721 1605 1683 1774 1885 1583 1774 O 1712 1774 1883 1303 08orve(g_o),o 20.4 18.8 0.5 0.2 10.8 4�5 1.2 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.3 71 Cycle OC|eor(Q-c).o 204 18.8 0.6 02 10,8 4.5 1.2 8.0 0.2 2.4 0.3 71 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cup(c),vnh/h &M 2308 747 & 1177 430 34 O 624 678 809 1502 VYCRuUu(X) 0,94 0.60 8.02 0.63 8.59 O�24 8.67 0.00 8.01 0.12 0.01 0.27 Avail Cmph u.vmb@ 841 2388 747 296 1808 626 70 0 624 588 600 1692 HCMPlatoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1�00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UpatreomFi|ter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 UnUbnnDelay (d).akeh33.4 17.5 12.7 44.7 30.8 25.5 43.8 0.0 217 2O0 20.6 9.8 |norDelay (d2)' x1voh 18.6 0.4 OD 481 0.6 0.3 19.0 O�O DD 01 0.0 0.4 Initial Delmy(d3),ukveh 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 96UoBackOK](5O9).veh811.O 87 0.2 02 51 2,0 0.8 0.0 0.1 12 01 2.8 LnGrp Deloy(d),oivoh 52.0 17.9 127 92.8 312 25.8 83.8 0.0 21.8 20.1 20,6 10.2 LnGrp LOS D B B F C C E C C C B Approach Vol, veh/h 2248 794 29 08 Approach Delay, o/veh 29.9 30.8 551 11.7 Approach LOS C C E 8 AmsigmadPhm 1 2 % 4 6 8 7 8 9hoDuration K]+Y+Ro.o78 31.6 44 48.4 57 33.4 26�O 24.8 Change Period (Y+Rd'o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green 3o#iog (Gmux4,.& 16.8 18.0 39.0 4,0 16.0 22.0 32.0 Max QClear Time (g-c+|1).,t 2.2 2.2 20�8 32 0.1 22.4 128 Green Ext Time (p_o)'o 0.0 1.8 0.0 14.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 8,0 HCM2O1OCtrl Delay 27.7 HCM 2010 LOS C CivTech 8ynom8Report 2O18Total PN1 CDppeMWVndResort 5' Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase �� Offset: O(0%),Referenced bophase 2:NBTand 6:SBTL.Start ofGreen Splits and Phases: 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd I t02 OZ) QvTooh 8vnohmQReport 4 7— Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes You Yes Yes Yen Yes Yes Recall Mode None C -Max None Nona None C -Max None None Maximum Split h0 8 20 19 43 O 20 26 36 Maximum Split (96) 8.0% 22.296 21.1% 47.89& 8.9% 22.2% 28.9% 40OY6 Minimum Split (o) 8 20 8 30 8 20 8 20 Yellow Time (o) 15 15 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.6 0�5 8.5 0.5 O.5 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 O O 0 0 U O Time TnReduce (s) 0 0 O 0 O 8 D O Walk Time (o) 5 6 6 5 Flesh Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes No Yes No Yen No Yes Inhibit Max Yes #m yes Yes Yes 0m yes Yes Start Time (m) 82 0 20 39 82 O 20 46 End Time (u) O 20 38 82 O 20 48 82 Yield/Force Off (o) 86 18 35 78 88 18 42 78 Yin[d/FonmOff 170(s) 88 3 35 67 88 5 42 67 Local Start Time (u) 82 O 28 39 82 O 20 46 Local Yield (o) 88 16 35 78 88 18 42 78 Local Yield 17D(u) 86 5 35 87 86 5 42 87 Cycle Length 90 Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Natural Cycle 85 Offset: O(0%),Referenced bophase 2:NBTand 6:SBTL.Start ofGreen Splits and Phases: 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd I t02 OZ) QvTooh 8vnohmQReport 2018 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection - �. Int Delay, slveh 4.5 WBL WBR NEST NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y 14, Conflicting Flow All 42 t Traffic Vol, vehlh 70 0 2 66 0 3 Future Vol, vehlh 70 0 2 fib 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 2.218 - 80 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 78 0 2 73 0 3 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03107/2017 Page 8 Conflicting Flow All 42 39 0 0 76 0 Stage 1 39 - - - - - Stage 2 3 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5,42 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 969 1033 - 1523 - Stage 1 983 - - - Stage 2 1020 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 969 1033 - - 1523 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 969 - - - - Stage 1 983 - - - - - Stage 2 1020 Approach 111±x' NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRW6Ln1 SBL SBT Capacity (vehfh) 969 1523 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 4.08 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 0 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03107/2017 Page 8 2018 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 7: Copperwynd Dr & Driveway B HCM 2010 TWSC Int Delay, slveh 5 -L. y SSR' - _ Lane Configurations T+ Y Traffic Vol, vehlh 14 10 8 0 0 18 Future Vol, vehfh 14 10 8 0 0 18 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 11 9 0 0 20 M-- — — t - — - - - Conflicting Flow All 9 0 - 0 51 9 Stage 1 - - - - 9 - Stage 2 - - - 42 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 5.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1611 - - 958 1073 Stage 1 - - 1014 - Stage 2 - - - - 980 - Piatoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1611 - - - 948 1073 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 948 - Stage 1 - - - 1014 - Stage 2 - - 970 Approach EB WB SB _4 HCM Central Delay. s 4.2 0 8-4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 1611 9073 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.01 U19 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - - 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310712017 Page 9 APPENDIX bf G. 2023 PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS C i v T e c h HCM 2010 TWSC 1; Eagle Ridge Or $, CopperwyrFd Or zgS2017 - In! Delay, s4eh 0.5 CuppemvA Pewft 2.M4017 2023 Backgrarard AM Synehm 8 Repent CiwTedr Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Midge Dr & Claud Crest DrGurnmit Dr North V15017 In>l:tsedri In! Nlay. shvl 0-5 WBU —up mar MR 1581 SBT VA wewa 8 5 167 9 4 161 ConffdTig Peds. AN q D 0 e e q Sgncanbd Sbbp SMp Free Faee free Free RTChannefined - bone - None - Woe StcoweL-A q Free Fr -e 11e - -Kane Ve.'nmh4cd&sShbtage,>x -None - - None - - Grade. % q 4.12 0 cdfiml Hdwy Sig 1 q Peak Ftw Fader 9a Wl 90 90 90 go Ekon Vehiides % 2 2 2 2 2 2 M"Flaw, 9 6 186 19 9 201 Malo� _ Dart 3.518 Peak How Fadar 43 90 9D 90 Matt1wifr� w7 Contk&g Flory Al 401 191 Q e 196 0 Stage 1 191 2 2 2 2 2 Stage 2 218 7 0 D 1 1 6 6 CaaO Hdwy 8.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - C tical Hdwr S1g 1 5.42 - 535 - 821 Crttiral Htiwy Sig 2 5.42. - - - - - F91k7w-upHday 3..518 3.316 - - 2218 - PcA Capt Maneuver 605 851 778 1377 Stage 1 841 _ _ _ _ _ Sbge 2 625 - T8p 71'9 PW,xn bliede . % MavCap-1 ManeweT 603 851 1377 V,N Cap -2 Mmeuves 8d3 - - - Stage 1 841 Stage 2 823 - KM CarNol Delay, s ,04 0 0.2 HCM LOSL B FRegr' `TMarnt -NBT Naw -Or z8L BT Capac Sy (veh h) 679 1377 HCM Lane VtCRat6 0.021 0.003 HCM C xanal Delay ls) - - 10.4 T6 - HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 9% %tile O;veh1 al 0 CuppemvA Pewft 2.M4017 2023 Backgrarard AM Synehm 8 Repent CiwTedr Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Midge Dr & Claud Crest DrGurnmit Dr North V15017 In>l:tsedri In! Nlay. shvl 0-5 9- —NBL Pa %T---" - - - SK SBFT VC1, vehlh 6 0 Q 1 i i 5 1 m 1 1 197 0 ConFc* Pear srihr 0 q Q D 0 q 0 0 0 D 0 0 SignConhal Stag SIM SWP Stop Sbbp Slap Free Free Free free Free Fr -e RTCtam. eFzed - -Kane - -None - - None - - None Storage Lenwh 4.12 4-12 cdfiml Hdwy Sig 1 125 5.52 115 6.12 5.52 Veh in Mahan Sbrage. Crfcal HdwySo 2 612 552 - 6.12 Grade % 0 - 0 Fal--up4dwyr 0 4.018 q 3.518 Peak How Fadar 43 90 9D 90 9e g0 w7 90 % 9e 90 gD Heavy VeNc6s, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFkrw 7 0 D 1 1 6 6 187 1 1 219 0 9- —NBL — 51 58T 8 R — — -- capa^* (W+A) 1350 535 729 13M 15CM [ane Wr Ratio D.OA - C.tviFciirg Flaw All 423 420 219 419 419 187 219 4 0 1F3 g 4 Stage 1 221 221 - k98 198 - - - - stage 2 292 199 - 22$ 221 Crbal W" 7.52 6.S2 6.22 7.12 6-52 622 4.12 4-12 cdfiml Hdwy Sig 1 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Crfcal HdwySo 2 612 552 - 6.12 5-52 Fal--up4dwyr 3.516 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3-3i6 2218 2118 Pat Cap4Maarerner 591 525 821 544 525 955 1360 - 1386 51age 1 781 721 88e4 737 - S1age 2 PW" 800 736 781 720 blocked. % MovCakiManevwr 535 522 821 542 522 .B55 1350 5386 Pmv Cap -2 Mmmwr 535 522 - 542 522 slaw 1 778 719 880 734 Stage 2 796 733 - T8p 71'9 H",.M Crxrinrl Drby. a 11.8 1 D e2 q HCM LOS B B kit ane,7Aaii ga - —NBL — 51 58T 8 R — — -- capa^* (W+A) 1350 535 729 13M 15CM [ane Wr Ratio D.OA 0.012 1011 AOD1 YVA Cantral Dewy {s) 7.7 11.8 10 7.6 NCM Lane LOS A B 8 A Hcm 95th me Ol eb) 0 0 e Q CgokenvyrA Resort 271417 2023 Backwound AM SynOro 8 Report CivTech Page 2 HCM 2010 TW5C 3: Eagle Ridge Dr 8r Summit Dr South 2f90V Ir G°lay, s42h 06 1doem:rd E'BL Mr -Mk V&L W 1OR N9L NBT NER SBL Vii' 9M VO vaha 0 209 0 1 170 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 Con"ng Peds, #1:* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 SignCenttd Free Free FrL- Fres F" Free Shp Srop Shrp SP -%P stop RT Char+..'relimd - - N^rw_ - - Fane - - Normo - - None sbr-ge L=t m 100 - - - - - - - - - - - Veb in MedianSlurage.! - 0 - - © - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 1336 0 541 521 853 0 2 0. 0 541 521 - Peak HaurFa:?.r 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 96 Flea y Wehi tel s, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M=tFks 0 232 0 t 169 0 1 0 0 21 0 0 lifawrTane F l BT E13R 1N13L 9l1µ8 W€1RS`BLn1 Capacity hehfhj 541 1385 1338 541 HCM Lane V7CRakb 0-002' - 0.001 0.039 HCM CDr*Ol N12y(s) 41-7 0 77 0 11-4 KM Lane LOS 11 A A A B HCM 95th ` Ne Qvebr 0 0 0 O1 Copper+ryard Resod 211 42 0 8 7 2023 &xkground AM SlmclrrD 8 Repot UTeeb Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ride DrtPatornina Blvd 2f152lN7 CsrdktingFbwAN T99 0 0 232 0 0 423 423 232 423 423 184 Stage 1 39.5 - 232 232 - 191 191 - stage 2 - 191 191 - 232 232 - CoticalHdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.1 .2 5.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critic. H6vwy Big 1 - - - - - - 6.12. 5.52 - 6.1.2 5.52 - Cfi c* Rd" Sip 2 CmW,mg Approach Left 8.12 5.52 - 6-12 5.52 FW10w-vp" 2-218 2219 3.516 4-010 0318 3.516 4,018 1318 Pat Cap INanevver 1365 1335 541 522 907 511 522 953 Stage 1 - - 771 713 611 742 - stw 2 0.90 460 611 702 771 713 - bblad- 0.90 0.90 090 0,90 0.90 0.911 Mw Cap -i Woetmer 1385 1336 541 521 807 541 521 853 Max Cap -2 Maneuve* 2 2 2 %1 521 541 521 - Stage 1 0 0 78 1 771 713 611 741 Stage 2 21 1 - 810 741 771 713 EB - - Na - HCM CwW Delay, s 0 0 11.7 1111 HCM LOS B B B lifawrTane F l BT E13R 1N13L 9l1µ8 W€1RS`BLn1 Capacity hehfhj 541 1385 1338 541 HCM Lane V7CRakb 0-002' - 0.001 0.039 HCM CDr*Ol N12y(s) 41-7 0 77 0 11-4 KM Lane LOS 11 A A A B HCM 95th ` Ne Qvebr 0 0 0 O1 Copper+ryard Resod 211 42 0 8 7 2023 &xkground AM SlmclrrD 8 Repot UTeeb Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ride DrtPatornina Blvd 2f152lN7 CopperviyrrdRmcdt 2f14f24T72D23BacAgmundA)A &Fchm8Repm CWTOrh page 4 Iln6ma=n Delay, sNeh 39.5 EB SB Mifsecban L05 E 2 2 ME&I6L CmW,mg Approach Left ---tw WBIT WK"w-wm ,Wu JBL-'mr- VOL uehh 0 AO 21 114 0 42 19 26 0 87 322 6 NaHour FaMr 0.90 460 4.90 0.°,A 0.40 0-9p 0.90 0.90 090 0,90 0.90 0.911 HeaugVeNdes,56 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MmA Flow NumterofLarres 0 0 78 1 23 127 1 0 0 0 47 1 21 1 N 0 0 0 97 0 358 7 2 1 CopperviyrrdRmcdt 2f14f24T72D23BacAgmundA)A &Fchm8Repm CWTOrh page 4 009-sx3APProach 468 EB SB Oappesrtg La -s 2 2 3 CmW,mg Approach Left S6 NB F$ CsonOiN.^ Lanes tell 3 3 2 f onffc" Appoach Right NB SB via Corffd xJ Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Gonhd Deby 15.1 135 19.6 HCU LCS C B C 1f GT-RRI N®ln3 �r t+e2 n 56Cn 'fdLA% 45% 0% 0'a 100% 096 100% 1136 IM% 0'w 0% VdThru,% 5596 10096 0% 0°m 16% 0% 42% 0% 18O% 830+0 Vd RiOL % 9% 0`.K 16(A 0% &4% 0% 5811 0% 056 17% signomw SAF w stP Stop Stop ROP Stu stop SbP SNP Trdffx Vol by Laie 794 215 6 70 135 42 45 9 599 361 LT Vol 87 0 0 70 0 42 0 9 4 0 16mughW 107 215 0 0 21 0 19 0 549 300 RT Vd 0 0 5 0 114 0 26 0 0 61 Lam FhrRate 216 239 7 78 150 47 50 10 96 401 Ge mbv Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 B 6 8 Oe9-4AU14CA) 0-50 054 0.014 0.203 0.345 0.128 O.T25 0.022 1 0.818 QeparhrreH-Away{Hd1 B.372 $.146 TA48 9.382 8.305 9-881 &989 7,979 7-468 7.348 ance.YM Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 432 444 48t 383 434 384 400 449 493 493 ServmTurx 8.140; 3.879 5.179 TAU 6.037 7.62 6.728 5.715 5.205 5.084 HCM Lane VAC Rack 0,5 O.5N 0.015 0.2144 0.346 0-129 0.125 0.022 1.351 0.813 HCM Carkal may 19.3 20.1 113 14-5 15.4 14. T 13 10.9 69,3 35-4 HCM Lane LCIS c c 6 B C B B B F E HCM 95th -ft a 27 3.1 0 0.7 1-5 0.4 OA 0.1 13.4 7.9 CopperviyrrdRmcdt 2f14f24T72D23BacAgmundA)A &Fchm8Repm CWTOrh page 4 HCM 2410 AWSC 4: Pa4sades Blvd & Eagfe Ridge DdPalonlino Blvd 2113x2017 CapperwyW Rom M4017 2023 BwAgmridAM syncbmB Report CwTeeh Page 5 HCM 21}14 Signalt-red Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 2115017 -* -1 1r- k1 t fi ".l -' i 'EI3 t E&1i 'WEL -Wa- 9i'sRNALF-W -W TE ffT - SBR L- CmfigurA-5 iiia W - Cppm" App-, h Ne Opmsq Lanes Ynter56�Yion'fletay, sR+ieh C*nk cVApproxh Len YYE1 CmPx* g Laces LefR 2 Infers nn LOS Ee ConfciclgianesRgh4 2 IICMConYralOeray f KIVI LCIS SHS Tom. 143 Vol, V" 0 9 890 61 Ptak lburFador 0.90 090 0.90 6.90 Heavy Veh&s. % 2 2 2 2 Mv" F6w 6 i0 9% 66 NunberodLanes 0 1 2 0 CapperwyW Rom M4017 2023 BwAgmridAM syncbmB Report CwTeeh Page 5 HCM 21}14 Signalt-red Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 2115017 -* -1 1r- k1 t fi ".l -' i 'EI3 t E&1i 'WEL -Wa- 9i'sRNALF-W -W TE ffT - SBR L- CmfigurA-5 iiia W - Cppm" App-, h Ne Opmsq Lanes 3 C*nk cVApproxh Len YYE1 CmPx* g Laces LefR 2 Cmfliz.*AppoachRs01 Ee ConfciclgianesRgh4 2 IICMConYralOeray 55.5 KIVI LCIS F CapperwyW Rom M4017 2023 BwAgmridAM syncbmB Report CwTeeh Page 5 HCM 21}14 Signalt-red Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 2115017 -* -1 1r- k1 t fi ".l -' i 'EI3 t E&1i 'WEL -Wa- 9i'sRNALF-W -W TE ffT - SBR L- CmfigurA-5 iiia W F ttt r ) T+ V } PrIK Vohxrre(aehfi) 329 514 6 1 1135 75 14 12 14 143 5 Number 7 4 14 3 8 16 5 2 12 1 6 16 Pn" Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 4 0 0 Pe4BYkeAdXA-rJ1} Y.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 ParYN Bus, Ar14 1.00 1.00 1 O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 Adj Sal Flnw, velu4uln 1863 f663 1863 1563 1563 11M3 1663 1883 1900 1863 1f3 1963 Adj Flown Rabe. wehlh 366 571 9 1 1264 83 16 13 16 159 6 1076 Adj No. of Lis 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak RwrFacbr 0.90 0.90 090 C90 0.9D 0i90 0.90 0.90 0.110 0.90 6,90 0.90 Percerd Rea y Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cao +duh 447 2392 745 2 1736 611 26 233 217 564 126 1299 AA,e On Green 0.13 0.47 047 000 0.34 0.34 0.01 0.31 031 0.04 0.34 0.34 S31Fk)w,veh"h 3442 3065 1583 1774 5N15 1583 1774 761 937 Y774 1063 2787 Grp Vahrroe$vj,vehA 366 571 9 1 t264 83 116 0 29 159 6 1676.. Grp Sat 1595 1583 1774 1695 1553 1774 0 1697 1734 1153 1393 O Se (r�sj. s 9.3 fi.0 0.3 CIA 49.6 3.1 0.8 0-0 t.1 4.0 02 30.1 Cyde 0 Clearjg o}, s 4.3 1-0 0.3 0,1 194 31 0.8 0.0 11.1 4.0 0.2 30.2 P" In Lane t.00 1.611 140 1-00 1.00 055 100 00 Lane Grp Caplej. veFr7le 447 2352 745 2 17.36 61t 26 0 621) %4 626 12% VAC Ra1io(Xj 0.52 0.24 Q01 051 6.73 0.14 0-62 0-00 0.06 0.26 0.0t 0.63 AvACap[c_a1,v+efxfi 535 2392 745 RB 1921 6% 118 0 520 564 626 1249 HCM P1aloon Ratio t.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 t.00 1 00 1.00 Upstm-!Ra r(fj L00 1.D0 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 100 1,06 1.00 1.00 Wlorm Delay 1d). sHeh 361 14.2 127 44,+3 26,0 17.9 44,1 0.0 220 .20.8 19.9 20,9 IwDelay ld2J.sNeh 1.3 0.1 0,0 1285 1.3 0.1 21.3 110 02 0.3 0.0 6.2 Ir,hWQ0et*d3jsA0 0-0 9.0 00 0.0 DO 00 0.0 0.0 DO DO 0.0 0.0 %ifs kflPGty%kv +hA.9 2.8 0.1 0.1 43 1.4 0.5 0.0 V5 1.0 0.1 128 LnGrp OeWA,s'xeh 46.4 14.3 12.7 133.5 2'7.2 18.0 6115.4 00 222 21.1 19.9 27.1 LhGrp LOS 0 B B F C 9 E C C B C ApprnahVn1_vubh 946 1348 45 1241 Approach De*. shreh 25.7 26,5 37.6 T.3 Approach LOS C C 6 C iiiu - -1 -f-Y--4-5- Assignedm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a lstrs [kuaWn iG, Y-Rcj, s8.0 31.6 4.1 45.3 5.3 34.3 15:7 34.7 Change Period (Y4Rc). s 4.0 4.0 4.-0 4.0 4.0 4:0 4.0 4.0 Max Giem Set5N (Gmarr¢.0 22.0 6.0 420 6.0 20.0 14.0 34.0 Ma G Clear Teen (9_e-4 q.a 3.1 21 B.0 28 322 11:3 21.6 GrmaEKtTme{prj,s 0.0 5,2 0.0 1&6 0.0 0.0 0.4 9.1 HCM 201 D Cbl OeBay 26.7 HCM201DL1i$ C Uppwwynd Resod MOW 2023 BaAgrawidAM Synrhro 8 Repan CrrTech Page 7 HCK4 2010 TWSC 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A 2<r15017 [IT! Dew. 5wh 03 "im-R- —WB-r--WgR M -- mlf'Rw - VL-wr— — — VOL URM 27 0 iD4 9 0 157 Confk6m Pe& Or 0 a 0 0 0 0 sip CM4 Slop stop Free Free Free Free RY Chamekmd Nona 2218 None . None WW Length 0 977 cqa&, % 0 an 0 Velh in Median SWage, P D 90 90 90 90 90 90 Fiea yvowm % Grade, % 0 2 2 K" Row 4 9 VI a PeakIkKirl'actof 90 90 CIO .40 90 90 Hemv0fK*5.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MwA Flow 30 a H6 T6 0 174 w910mFRw— —wowi --Nw- - - OxffarkV Fkw PJ 327 153 a 0 Ili 0 Stage 1 153 Stage 2 174 - - crk,q] W" 6.42 6.22 4-1.2 crti'A M" stg I SA2 - Cr6ml M" Stq 2 5A2 FolllwupHrlwy 3.598 3.318 ZM PokCap-1 Maneuver 667 8w 113113 stage 1 875 stage 2 856 Plalcoalloded. % mucap-ImaneLwr we m 13113 MmCa{,2Ma18us,er 667 St -QE 1 $75 Stage 2 856 mcm CoRw Delay. s 10.7 0 D fcm LOS a Na5w a —�Wma- NBT RmLnf—ss-[- gr-- Caf)-AY(Vebb w 1393 HCM Lane VC Rafo 10l5 XM CoW Delay (s) to? 0 WIM Lam LOS El A KM 95th %M TAN 01 0 CopperfiryTxf RewN 211412017 2023Background AM $YwAro 8 ReW CiAmi, Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 7: Copperwyrd Dr & Driveway B VIV2017 mt 0". S&,Rh 26 1466wil M —'WBr Wk' SBL �t Vol. webh 1$ 5 12 0 0 1 Conffl'cikmj Peds, Thr 0 0 0 0 0 D Sign CffrW Free Free I'me Free Slop Stop RT ChanneEzed None time - Nme Sbz9ff L -Po 5.42 Folk—pmd" 2218 VeN in Wdw Skwage D PbtCap-I Mane mer 0 977 cqa&, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Fiea yvowm % 2 2 2 2 2 2 K" Row 4 9 VI a 6 t Awomh — ES —A97-- SH HCM Control Nary. s 4.5 0 84 KIM LOS A Cape* f-00 Canfc6N Firm All 13 0 0 36 13 Stage 1 KM 03*d Del&f 0) 13 - &age 2 A A 23 - Gma Hdwj 4.12 6,42 622 Critical Hdww SIg 1 - 5,47 - UhCat Sd%-y Stq 2 5.42 Folk—pmd" 2218 3.518 3.318 PbtCap-I Mane mer 16% 977 1067 stage 1 - 1010 - Stage 2 1000 - PWW bkcktd. % Naw Cal ->-I mamwer ifim 971 1097 Mav Cap -2 Marromr 971 - Stage 1 1010 Stage 2 w - Awomh — ES —A97-- SH HCM Control Nary. s 4.5 0 84 KIM LOS A Copperwynd Resort 21'1412017 2023 Eta kfTourid AM Syradro 8 ReW CivTmb Page to Cape* f-00 1606 1067 HCM Laflevn Rat* 0.006 0,001 KM 03*d Del&f 0) 7.3 0 9.4 RCM Lam LOIS A A A HCM l% %bb Q(vehj 0 - 0 Copperwynd Resort 21'1412017 2023 Eta kfTourid AM Syradro 8 ReW CivTmb Page to HCM 20107 TVNSC 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Coppe=d Dr 2r15017 fi1�rsei�rl — In1 Delay. V eh 0.6 Batsmen W9 '34E3it T --OR! —SOL EBT VEL vehn 14 8 218. 13 5 191 Corrlhckng Peds, Biu 0 0 0 0 0 0 S*Onarko1 Skay Stop Feet free Free Free RT 02innelized 5A2 Nene N3M - Nom Strap LOrK a 0 SignCanhd Follow-upHdwy 140 Veh in 1Ae w Storage. rF 0 Pot Cap 1 #aneuver 9 0 ra(le. % 0 741 0 0 Peak 1burFatar 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy lrehdm' % 2 2 2 2 2 2 We, Fbw 16 9 242 17 6 212 Appood '7P8 F1B - SB - HCM Contra)Delay. s :1t 0 0? CunFicfi FlowAt 474 251 0 0 255 0 Stage 1 251 - - - - - Slage 2 223 HCM Lane Ltd - CrOicalHdwy F42 6.22 4.12 Crifl al Wwry SN 1 5A2 0 0 Cri ical F" St 2 5.42 a 0 SignCanhd Follow-upHdwy 3.518 3.318 2-218 Pot Cap 1 #aneuver 549 788 1306 Stage 1 741 - - Stage 2 814 - - PN1oen Node d, % - - Now S1ora3elag18 Mrrcap-1 Maneuver 546 768 1306 Mav Cap -2 Maneuver 546 - Stage t 791 6 Slag, 2 810 0 Appood '7P8 F1B - SB - HCM Contra)Delay. s :1t 0 0? HCmtOS B 777 - - NBT NBOBlIn1 M_ T C% -x y(veh4w) 615 1305 KM Lace VIC ROW Q04 OAA HCM Con6v1Debyis) 11.1 7.8 HCM Lane Ltd B A 14CM9%9>51e4$weh) - - 0.1 0 Cappenyrrd REwil VIM? 2023 Background PM Sy xhm 8 Repan CWTKh Pagel HGM 20107 TWSC 2. Eagle Ridge 3k & Oc ud Crest OdSummit E lr North 2+TS4017 hd.Way, sheh 0.. gmffent EBL EBT 1=BR 1 -1�V$fi i4Bti HEI -MT-MR - - 414 777 - - Vol, WWI 4 4 0 0 P 4 4 235 1 0 208 2 Con" Peds, nthr G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 SignCanhd Stop stop slap sftP "sop Siop Free Free Free free Free Free RTChdnnelW - - Horn - - None - - tone - - Now S1ora3elag18 i25 t15 Veh in MedianStordge-# 6 0 0 8 Grade- % 0 0 0 0 Peat ftioFacw 90 96 90 90 90 90 m 90 90 90 90 90 K%wq Vetkin. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mw A Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 261 1 0 231 2 Yom— M 61' Conte Flow Ak 505 5103 232 503 6:14 262 233 0 0 262 0 0 Stage t 232 232 271 271 - - - Stage 2 273 271 232 233 - - Crrkzl Hd" 712 652 6 22 712 5.52 6.22 412 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 6T2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Crli-:alWwySig 2 6.12 5.52 6.12 552 - - FolluK p Hdnyr 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.516 4.018 3.316 2218 2.219 Pot Cap 1 wanewou 478 471 807 479 470 777 1335 1302 Stage 1 773 713 - 735 685 Stage 2 733 685 771 712 Plamn Need % Vow Cap lManeuver 474 470 807 476 469 777 1335 1302 MdvCap•2Manetmr 474 470 - 478 469 Sags: E 769 713 733 633 Stage 2 727 E93 771 712 r;LVloa — -pB- F CM Carinal Way.. s 12.7 97 0.1 0� KM L45 B A Coppnr rrridResal 2114017 2023 Baakgrourvd PM S rmhco9Repan CwTeah Page 2 11302 Cap -Ry (whA) 1335 - - 414 777 - - irm Lam 4 c Rata 0.003 0-M 0.006 - XM Cartrol Delay;s) 7.7 12.7 9.7 0 MCM Lare LM A B A A ROM rah 'mile Cgveh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - - Coppnr rrridResal 2114017 2023 Baakgrourvd PM S rmhco9Repan CwTeah Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Surnn-A Dr SiDuth 2fl&n17 kd delay. 01A 0.5 611awr65i-W EBL EBr UR %9:-m MIT N13L HST OUR 1891-sBfPM Vol. webh 1 221 1 9 236 25 0 0 1 19 0 F ConfldngPeds, >>illr 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 - n Cadrol Free Fee Free Fore Fre? Free slop stop stop Shap stop Slop RT Channefaed - - 143re - - hbne - - Noce Vol. wehhr 0 SIGW- Length 100 92 0 24 ail 19 0 141 795 43 Peafk Baur Facer Veh in Lbdian Shrage, R 0.941 0 0.90 9 OM 0 4.90 0.90 0 Grade, % 2 0 - 2 0 - - 0 - 2 0 PeAHour Fa= 90 94 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 49 Co ql Heavy Vehicles. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mwr° Flaw 1 245 1 0 262 28 0 0 1 21 0 1 3' 1Aaps1- ullrFi- - ldajai2 351+5 1Y% 0% IN% 0% 100% fr4nor�- 1I'm 0% �' ConFz7hgFbwAR 290 0 0 747 0 0 525 536 246 525 525 216 Stage 1 - - - - - - 24B 246 - 276 275 - Siage 2 - - slop SwP St* 277 290 - 249 249 - Crbi w M" 4.12 Sbp 4.12 406 530 7.12 5.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Crbcad H* Gig 1 - - - LT Vol 141 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Crtwl H3ery SO 2 0 14 - 0 ThrotgN V4 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Fakw-upHdryy 2.216 - 2219 2% 148 3.516 4016 3-318 3518 4.018 3.318 PedCap-1 Manrever 1272 9 1319 0 0 453 450 793 463 458 763 Stage - 138 - 54 - 756 701 227 730 682 - Stage 2 8 8 8 8 8 729 672 B 755 741 - Platcon blocked. p..' 1 - 0.312 PM5 Oil 0.151 0.0.19 0.772 0.52 McwCapi M murer 1272 7-975 1319 10M5 9.003 462 450 793 462 458 763 MovCap2Maieuner - - Yes Yes 1!es 462 450 - 462 458 - Stage 1 Yes Cap 451 454 496 755 700 402 729 682 Stage 2 428 435 Serowe Trnc 5.628 5.15 728 672 7.721 753 700 7.691 6.723 6.223 6.031 HCM Lane VC Raba 1 1.283 4396 0.31 0.343 91081 0,15 0.04 HCM Control Oelay, s 0 HCM Carol Delay 0 79.5 10.7 9.5 113A 13 14.5 14CMLOS 34.7 19.7 HCM Larne LCG F E A C 6 8 Coapenvyr d ResM 2r14R417 2023 Back"nd PM synchreF 8 ReW CivT116 Page 3 HCM 21710 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr(Palornino Blvd 211 512 0 1 7 lft Capar NOW 793 1272 1319 471 "CM Lam VlCRatio ON 1907 - 0.947 HCM Contra +Delay {s} 9.5 7-6 0 13 HCMLweLOS A A - A B HCM93^.4' CKweh) 0 0 0 CIA Coapenvyr d ResM 2r14R417 2023 Back"nd PM synchreF 8 ReW CivT116 Page 3 HCM 21710 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr(Palornino Blvd 211 512 0 1 7 lft - �- L p,.�pc.G�.�M Aparaarh nlersp^iinn Delay. s.Ne--h 48 Ea SB f17 `+Ypocr 3 Wes Inters n LOS E 2 3 U.f-6 Yrg Alppman Left r YBU - ER: E31- YIBQ-'WBL- -`WBT -4'1�' E8 i Vol. wehhr 0 101 32 92 0 24 ail 19 0 141 795 43 Peafk Baur Facer 0.90 0.941 0 g 0.90 9.90 0.90 0.90 OM 0.90 4.90 0.90 0-90 Heavy Vehidc&% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MwreFow 0 f12 36 102 0 27 33 21 0 157 883 48 NnurrberelLanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 AOFN- -Ea �- L p,.�pc.G�.�M Aparaarh 1h'9 Ea SB f17 `+Ypocr 3 Wes 2 2 3 U.f-6 Yrg Alppman Left S8 N13 E8 CcrrfFclj J Lanes LEA 3 3 2 Coning ApMafh Rr3h1 KB SE yyg Conffic" Laos MqM 3 3 2 HGM Control Delay 15.8 14.5 68.2 HCM LOS C 5 F Lane NBErt1 EBLnT `E�En' rii 1T'n2Lr 3' r2 ullrFi- - VDILet% 351+5 1Y% 0% IN% 0% 100% 0% 1I'm 0% 0'1 VcdTBru, a 6A IOD% 0% 0% 26% h 61% 0% 190` 733 Val Right % Oak 0% 109% 0% 74% 0% 39% 0`7 0- 2T% Sign Ceniml slop SwP St* Sip Slop Shop Slap Stop Slop Sbp Trak Vol by Lane 406 530 43 101 124 24 49 14 296 204 LT Vol 141 0 0 141 0 24 0 14 0 0 ThrotgN V4 265 534 0 0 32 0 30 0 2% 148 RT Vol 0 d 43 0 92 9 19 0 0 56 Lure Fore Rate 451 589 48 112 138 27 54 16 329 227 Geonre" Grp 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 B 8 Cegmeolt1apq 1 1 0.0% 0.312 PM5 Oil 0.151 0.0.19 0.772 0.52 I vaftm Headway (ltd} 8.053 7-975 T I N 10M5 9.003 10342 9.977 5.955 8 455 &263 Con ergerm. YJN Yes Yes Yes 1!es Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 451 454 496 361 402 335 361 399 428 435 Serowe Trnc 5.628 5.15 4.933 7.721 6.70$ 8.457 7.691 6.723 6.223 6.031 HCM Lane VC Raba 1 1.283 4396 0.31 0.343 91081 0,15 0.04 0..769 8-522 HCM Carol Delay 71.a 79.5 10.7 17.2 113A 14.4 14.5 111 34.7 19.7 HCM Larne LCG F E B C C 8 B B ❑ C HCM Tr51h-W0 129 13 0.3 L3 1.5 0.3 0.5 0.1 6-6 2.9 Coppevmrd Resed 211412017 2073 Background PM Sgaehro, 8 Repast CieTKh Page 4 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DdPalomino Blvd 2P152017 AW -Z- SB- CPposm1 ApPoach NIS C%Oskq Lanes tnter^.,eclian 17elay, s'.eh ConBioling Approach Lefl we CwfliD6ngLanesLeA 2 3nllwsec ion Lob E.9 Cunl6cimg Lanes Right 2 UC6L Cocoa Delay Mi 98U, M. SET 59R Uel, welvti D 14 444 56 Peak Flour Fa=r 0.90 4.90 0.90 0.90 WavyVehide& 2 2 2 2 Mwm Fl.w D 16 493 62 ttr&-rollanes 0 1 2 0 AW -Z- SB- CPposm1 ApPoach NIS C%Oskq Lanes 3 ConBioling Approach Lefl we CwfliD6ngLanesLeA 2 CenDielingApproach Fight E.9 Cunl6cimg Lanes Right 2 UC6L Cocoa Delay 28 1 IPCM LOS D CmW&yndReser!2P1 AII2413ftftow4PU CvTiedr HCbil 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 2115f2017 .-* - -'* (- - "- '1, t /` '► : -/ 89E --EBT 1 906E -WEVi flg�€2. 901 got -&W LaneCcsdgsafions )) ft{ ? t#4 }r I Ti, Vi t rr VckK*(wtM) 083 1493 18 5 716 126 24 4 4 93 8 447 Number 7 4 14 3 8 16 5 2 12 1 6 F6 Inr4ia 0 iQb}, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 D 0 D Pe4l3ikeAtrp-OTj 1.00 1.D0 1,M 101) 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 PahkQBu%Adj 1.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1.40 1.00 too LOD AdjSal Flaw. veWn 1863 1863 1863 1663 18633 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 T963 1863 Adj Rm Rate. veM 981 16% 20 6 7% 142 27 4 4 103 9 497 Adj No. of Lars 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 D 1 1 2 PeakFfcurFxbdr 090 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.9D 0.90 Percent ivy Veli % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap.vehih 841 2436 759 11 1225 452 39 250 25D %A 587 1559 Amwe On Grp 024 0.48 D48 0.01 034 0.24 0.D2 021 0.29 0.04 0.32 0.32 Sal Flow. web fi 3442 5065 15113 1774 5M 1563 1774 656 656 1774 1863 2787 Grp Volur:Te(vj_u8hrh 961 1659 20 6 796 142 x7 D 8 103 9 497 Grp SatFtrnr(sLwh4wtn1721 1695 1593 1774 1695 1583 1774 D 1712 1774 1863 1393 0 Serve[gs}, s 22.0 222 0.6 0.3 P27 6.3 1.4 0.0 0,3 3.7 0.3 8.6 CyckOCIea Lc},s 22.0 22.7 0-6 0.3 127 6.3 1.4 0.0 03 3.7 9.3 8,6 Prop InLane 1,00 1.00 I.DD 1p3 1.00 050 1.00 110 Lane GTP COW).weiv'h 841 2436 759 11 1225 452 39 0 501 564 587 1559 VyC Rak(* 117 0.68 (1.03 0.55 0.65 0.31 0.70 ODD 0.02 0.18 0-02 0.32 Avail C-*C_a).vebb 841 2435 759 296 19M 633 79 0 501 5rA 567 1559 KM PWxm Ratio 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 too 5.00 $.Do 1.00 1 -Do 1:1x1 1.00 L"Irean Filkr(Ij 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.DD 1-00 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 too Ur*rmVcby(dj,s1eh340 P81 124 446 30,7 25.3 43.7 00 226 21.0 2T.2 10.5 kuDe*(d2).",O 87.6 0.8 0.0 36.2 0.6 0.4 202 00 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.5 ITidW 0 e1ay(d3j.sfaeh D.0 0.0 D0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %1e a tk0M5D%weh+9D 6 10:6 0.3 01 6.0 28 0.9 0.4 0.1 1.8 0.2 3.4 LnGrpDeiay(d),Uveh 121.6 18.9 124 848 31.3 25:8 63.9 40 22.7 211 21.3 11-2 Ln Los F 13 13 F C C E C C C 8 ApproschVml,weh4i 26M 944 35 609 App¢ aach Delay, &heh 567 30.3 54.5 13.0 Approach LOS f C D AssWied Ins 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 Phs Dmtkm (C4Y+1ac), M 3D.3 4.6 47.1 6.0 32.4 260 25.7 Champ Period (Y+Rcl, s 4.0 4.0 4.0 CD CO 4.0 4.0 4.D Max GFeen Setbrg } 6 16.0 15.0 39.0 4.0 16.0 22.A 37i hlaa 0 CleerTme "-&Ji§ 2.3 2.3 24.7 3A 10.6 24.0 14.7 Ckm EA TM (P-0, s 0.0 11 00 124 0.4 1.1 0.0 TO l#CM 2010 ON Delay 44.7 11CM 2010 LCrS D Syrchm8 a" CoPPerwond'REwd 311474017 2M "round PIM Synchroa ReW Page 5 I CivTech Pagel HCM 2010 TWSC 6: Eagle fridge Dr & Driveway A 211 512 0 1 1 Id ['clay. sheh 1.3 3dohemrtir4 ` — - WB -5V9R - - Wr ND SHL -sw— Vd, velkb 47 0 162 44 D 149 ConSKting Peds. Arhr 0 0 0 0 D 0 Si nCanlrim stop SLOP Free Free Flee Free RTCharmwlizea - Wme - Mone - Nam Storage L -ch 0 - Nom StMe &D Veh in Median Siaegt,, u 0 0 Veh in Medlar Slnrage, A Grade, % 0 0 a 0 a Peak Flow Fwbw .00 90 93 90 % 90 HeayVelles,'% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Wvml Flow 52 0 202 49 0 565 2 2 2 MvmlFlaw 9 13 Con5ding lbw AH 393 227 0 0 251 0 Stage 1 737 --- w --- - -- C"RiatingFkwWl Stage 2 146 - 0 41 10 Cr6i w Hdvey 5-42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hd" St 1 5.42 - Cr%aal W" Sig 2 5-42 - 4.12 FoOoet-W Hd" 3.518 3.318 Cr3sa1 Hdwy 1 2218 PmtCap-1Manesw 611 812 - CUM M" 2 1314 Stage 1 811 - 5.42 - Stage 2 863 3.516 3.318 Platoon blacked. °% 1610 - 97D MavCap- 1uamumr 611 812 1314 MovCap-210aaeraer 611 Slaw 2 - - Stage i 811 Pkalow blocked, % Stage 2 863 MovCWlManeuver 1610 41$ 1071 -m HCM CoriviCrelay, s 114 n 984 0 HCM LOS g 1013 War LaiE,'Al C.rNprnt teT N2RWBLr,1 SGL SSBI C,V--V1 Nv A -hl - . 6 r 1 1 "x14 HCM LaneM'C Rabo - am UCM Co"- C$1 11.4 D HCM Lane LOS B A HvM 95th 96&P Q(wh) - - 0.3 0 Crppemrpnd Resort M4017 2823 EadrgroorrdFM yprhrc 8 RepoA OWTeda Page g HCM 2010 TWSG 7: Crapperwynd Dr & Driveway 13 2/151017 rrrisrsectial IN Delay, &O eh 4 LEW—m96' --E13f c --%'9r-W9R - 8& low— V6, vel%fh 8 12 9 0 0 13 Cankting PeMs Or 0 0 0 D 0 0 SgnCaoirol Free Free Free Free Sbp Slap RTChami6zfd Nane None - Nom StMe 0 Veh in Medlar Slnrage, A - D 0 - 0 Grade- % 0 0 0 Peak Has Fa" 91) 90 90 90 90 % HeaiyVehicles.46 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmlFlaw 9 13 10 0 0 t4 wiiiWirm #aFaPri --- w --- - -- C"RiatingFkwWl 10 0 - 0 41 10 Stage 1 t0 Stage 2 31 - Crfxal Hdoy 4.12 6-42 6.22 Cr3sa1 Hdwy 1 5.42 - CUM M" 2 5.42 Follow-up Mwy 221$ 3.516 3.318 FttCao 1Maneueer 1610 97D 1071 5U 1 - 1013 Slaw 2 - 1132 Pkalow blocked, % MovCWlManeuver 1610 954 1071 WWCagr2Mammr - 984 - 1 1013 Rage 2 S% - HCM Control Olay- s 29 p 8.4 "CM LOS A Capac4y [veh1hj 1610 +071 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 01706 0.013 NCMCantolDelay (s) 72 0 E.4 HCM Lane LCG A A A HCM95th %We d(veh} 0 - 0 CoppwwYnd Resod 2114017 2023 Bad;grund P.kt Symtwo 8 Repwi Ci+Tech Page 10 2023 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Copperwynd Dr HCM 2010 TWSC lat 10, TO Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Lane Configurations Y Conflicting Flow All T# 252 0 t Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 5 216 21 4 217 Future Vol, veh/h 16 5 216 21 4 217 Conflicting Peds, #fhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None 529 None - None Storage Length 0 - - 110 - Veh In Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 6 240 23 4 241 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 1 Conflicting Flow All 502 252 0 0 263 0 Stage 1 252 - - - - - Stage 2 250 - Critical Hdwy 6.42 622 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3,518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 529 787 1301 Stage 1 790 - - Stage 2 792 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 527 787 1301 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 527 - - Stage 1 790 Stage 2 790 Approach VVB NB S8 HCM Control Delay, s 11.6 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBL SBT --- Capacity (vehih) 572 1301 HCM HCM Lane V/G Ratio 0.041 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 7.8 - HCM Lane LOS B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 01 0 - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 1 20123 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest Dr/Summit Dr North HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection _Ir'_ _--_ - Conflicting Flow All Int Delay, slveh 0.4 537 268 536 536 255 268L a_.� 0 256 0 0 Stage 1 270 270 - My EBL EBT EBR 1NBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations - - - 4 Critical Hdwy 7.12 + 6.22 '� T 6.52 I 1� 4.12 - - Traffic Vol, vehlh 6 0 0 1 1 5 5 229 1 1 241 0 Future Vol, vehlh 6 0 0 1 1 5 5 229 1 1 241 0 Conflicting Peds, #lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - Platoon blocked, %® None - - None Storage Length - - - 447 125 - - 115 - 784 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Stage1 Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 0 0 1 1 6 6 254 1 1 268 0 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 _Ir'_ _> Conflicting Flow All 539 537 268 536 536 255 268L a_.� 0 256 0 0 Stage 1 270 270 - 266 266 - - - - - - - Stage 2 269 267 - 270 270 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6,12 5.52 - 6.12 5,52 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 453 450 771 455 451 784 1296 - 1309 - Stage 1 736 686 - 739 689 - - - - - Stage 2 737 688 - 736 686 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, %® Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 447 448 771 453 449 784 1296 - - 1309 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 447 448 - 453 449 - - - - - Stage1 733 685 736 686 - - - - - Stage 2 727 685 735 685 - - - - Approach EB VdB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.2 10.6 6.2 0 HCM LOS S B Minor LanelMa or Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1W8Ln1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (vehlh) 1296 447 647 1309 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.004 0.015 0.012 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 13.2 10.6 7.8 - HCM Lane LOS A B B A - HCM 95th %t le Q(veh) 0 - 0 0 0 - - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 2023 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Minor LanelMajor Nov€nt NBLn1 EBL EBT EER WBL WET WSR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SB7 Lane Configurations 7,8 - - 13.3 HCM Lane LOS B A - A - B HCM 95th %stile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 Trak Vol, veh/h 0 253 0 1 231 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 253 0 1 231 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 281 0 1 257 0 1 0 0 21 0 0 _ ME- - _v- I i4!E _ - --1�'�_„� __ 1W��y}= _ Conflicting Flow All 257 0 0 281 0 0 540 540 281 540 540 257 Stage 1 - - - - - - 281 281 - 259 259 - Stage 2 - - - - - 259 259 - 281 281 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2,218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1308 - 1282 - - 453 449 758 453 449 782 Stage 1 - - - - - 726 678 - 746 694 - Stage 2 - _ - - - - 746 694 - 726 678 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1308 - 1282 - 453 449 758 453 449 782 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - 453 449 - 453 449 - Stage 1 - - - - 726 678 - 746 693 - Stage 2 - - 745 693 - 726 678 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 13 13.3 HCM LOS B B Minor LanelMajor Nov€nt NBLn1 EBL EBT EER WBL WET WSR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 453 1308 1282 453 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.001 0.047 HCM Control Delay (s) 13 0 7,8 - - 13.3 HCM Lane LOS B A - A - B HCM 95th %stile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 3 2023 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 AWSC CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 4 Opposing Approach WB Intersection Delay, slveh 101.7 EB S8 Opposing Lanes 2 Intersection LOS F 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB B EB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 G-: [ _tea-_ _ > Lane Configurations 2 T+ Conflicting Approach Right NB SB r Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 74 21 154 0 42 19 26 0 142 322 6 Future Vol, vehlh 0 74 21 154 0 42 19 26 0 142 322 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 82 23 171 0 47 21 29 0 158 358 7 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 4 Opposing Approach WB EB S8 Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Control Delay 18.3 14.8 25.8 HCM LOS C B D - -- - Vol Left, °Io 57% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 43% 100% 0% 0% 12% 0% 42% 0% 100% 82% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 88% 0% 58% 0% 0% 18% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 249 215 6 74 175 42 45 9 599 367 LT Vol 142 0 0 74 0 42 0 9 0 0 Through Vol 107 215 0 0 21 0 19 0 599 300 RT Vol 0 0 6 0 154 0 26 0 0 67 Lane Flow Rate 277 239 7 82 194 47 50 10 666 407 Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree of Util (X) 0.672 0.56 0.014 0.221 0.462 0.134 0.132 0.023 1.468 0.883 Departure Headway (Hd) 9.283 8.99 8.27 10.196 9.063 10.981 10.055 8.448 7.936 7.805 Convergence, YIN Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 391 403 435 354 401 329 359 424 459 464 Service Time 6.983 6.69 5.97 7.896 6.763 8.681 7.755 6.198 5.685 5.554 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.708 0.593 0.016 0.232 0.484 0.143 0.139 0.024 1.451 0.877 HCM Control Delay 29 22.5 11.1 15.8 19.3 15.4 14.3 11.4 243.9 46 HCM Lane LOS D C B C C C B B F E HCM 95th -tile 0 4.7 3.3 0 0.8 2.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 33.7 9.4 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 4 2023 Total AM Copp0nwVnd Resort 4' Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/PalominoDr/Palomino Blvd HCM2O1OAWSC Intersection Delay, wkmh Intersection LOS CivTech 8ynohmOReport Traffic Vol, v*h/h O 8 800 87 Future Vol, voNh O 9 899 87 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 WvmtFb* O 10 AQA 74 Number ofLanes 0 1 2 O Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 3 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCWControl Delay 167.3 HCML0S F CivTech 8ynohmOReport 2023 Total AM with a Signal (No EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Lane Configurations �'j - - �► Traffic Volume (vehlh) 74 21 154 42 19 26 142 322 6 9 899 67 Future Volume (vehfh) 74 21 154 42 19 26 142 322 6 9 899 67 Dumber 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 82 23 171 47 21 29 158 358 7 10 999 74 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 378 39 288 248 144 199 201 1776 795 18 1333 99 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.50 0,50 0.01 0,40 0.40 Sat Flow,veh1h 1349 191 1421 1184 710 980 1774 3539 1583 1774 3341 247 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 82 0 194 47 0 50 158 358 7 10 529 544 Grp Sat Flows),vehlhlln 1349 0 1612 1184 0 1690 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1819 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 0.0 5.7 2.0 0.0 1.3 4.6 3.0 0.1 0.3 13.5 13.5 Cycle Q Clear(g c), s 4.1 0.0 5.7 7.7 0.0 1.3 4.6 3.0 0.1 0.3 13.5 13.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehfh 378 0 327 248 0 343 201 1776 795 18 706 726 VEC Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.59 0.19 0.00 0.15 0.79 0.20 0.01 0.55 0,75 0,75 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 514 0 490 368 0 514 270 1776 795 135 706 726 HCM Platoon Ratio }� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), siveh 18,9 0.0 19.0 22.5 0.0 17.2 22.7 7.3 6.6 25.9 13.6 13.6 Incr Delay (d2), siveh 0,3 0.0 1.7 0.4 0.0 0.2 10,4 0.3 0.0 22.9 7.2 7.0 Initial Q Delay(0),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 QO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °]Dile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 1.1 0.0 2.7 03 0.0 0.6 2.8 1.5 0.1 0.3 7.9 8.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 19.2 0.0 20.7 22.9 0.0 17.4 33.1 7.5 6.6 48.8 20.7 20.6 LnGrp LOS_- B C C B C A A D C C Approach Vol, vehlh 276 97 523 1083 Approach Delay, siveh 20.3 20.1 15.3 20.9 Approach LDS C C B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5,5 31.4 15.7 11.0 26.0 15.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 25.0 16.0 8.0 21,0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c+11), s 2.3 5.0 7.7 6.6 15.5 9.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 9.8 1.2 0.1 3.9 1.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 19.3 HCM 2010 LDS B CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 1 2023 Total AM with a Signal (N© EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort 4. Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase 1r�-- Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ride Dr/Palomino Blvd \601 t02 —0 04 I ■— 05 # 06 lis CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 17 Movement SBL NBT EBTL NBL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None Mone Max None Maximum Split (s) 9 30 21 13 26 21 Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 50.0% 35.0% 21.7% 43.3% 35.0% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 9 39 0 13 39 End Time (s) 9 39 0 13 39 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 34 55 8 34 55 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 23 44 8 23 44 Local Start Time (s) 47 56 26 47 0 26 Local Yield (s) 51 21 42 55 21 42 Local Yield 170(x) 51 10 31 55 10 31 Cycle Length 60 Control Type Semi Act-Uncoord Natural Cycle 60 Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ride Dr/Palomino Blvd \601 t02 —0 04 I ■— 05 # 06 lis CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 2023 Total AM with a Signal (With EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary -,* f- 4-- *\ . Lane Configurations I t F I 1� 11 ft r 1 0 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 74 21 154 42 19 26 142 322 6 9 899 67 Future Volume (vehlh) 74 21 154 42 19 26 142 322 6 9 899 67 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Sus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 82 23 171 47 21 29 158 358 7 10 999 74 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 327 299 254 323 114 157 202 1864 834 18 1415 105 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.53 0,53 0.01 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, vehlh 1349 1863 1583 1184 710 980 1774 3539 1583 1774 3341 247 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 82 23 171 47 0 50 158 358 7 10 529 544 Grp Sat Flows),vehlhlln 1349 1863 1583 1184 0 1690 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1819 Q Serve(g_s), s 2,8 0.5 5.0 1.7 0.0 1.3 4.3 2.6 0.1 0.3 12.2 12.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.5 5,0 2.3 0.0 1.3 4.3 2.6 0.1 0.3 12.2 12.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 327 299 254 323 0 271 202 1864 834 18 749 770 V1C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.08 0.67 0.15 0.00 0,18 0.78 0.19 0.01 0.54 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 546 601 511 515 0 545 286 1864 834 143 749 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter([) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 19.8 17.7 19.6 18.7 0.0 18.0 21.4 6.2 5.6 244 11.8 11.8 incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.4 0.1 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 8.8 0.2 0.0 22.6 5.5 5.4 Initial Q Deiay(d3),slveh 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 1,1 0.3 2.4 0.6 0.0 0.6 2.6 1.4 0.0 0.2 7.0 7.2 LnGrp Deiay(d),slveh 20.2 17.8 22.7 18.9 0.0 18.3 30.2 6.4 5.6 47.0 17.3 17.2 LnGrp LOS C B C B B C A A D B B Approach Vol, vehlh 276 97 523 1083 Approach Delay, slveh 21.5 18.6 13.6 17.5 Approach LOS C 8 B B Mor 1i 2' 3 4- 7_ 8 - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.5 31.1 13.0 10.6 26.0 13.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 25.0 16.0 8.0 21.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.3 4.6 7.0 6.3 14.2 4.3 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 9.9 1.0 0.1 4.6 1.1 - - - - HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17.1 HCM 2010 LOS 8 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 1 2023 Total AM with a Signal (With EB RT Dane) Copperwynd Resort 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd \001 102 --PO4 i 051 06 08 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 2 T -, I .� 0 -- - -, Movement SBL NBT EBTL NBL 5BT WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 9 30 21 13 26 21 Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 50.0% 35.0010 21.7% 43.3% 35.0% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 1.1 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 9 39 0 13 39 End Time (s) 9 39 0 13 39 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 34 55 8 34 55 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 23 44 8 23 44 Local Start Time (s) 47 56 26 47 0 26 Local Yield (s) 51 21 42 55 21 42 Local Yield 170(s) 51 10 31 55 10 31 — -- — Cycle Length 60 Control Type Semi Act-Uncoord Natural Cycle 60 Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd \001 102 --PO4 i 051 06 08 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 2 2023 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary -1 -1. '-* f- '- k- 4\ t r' 1* 1 4/ A -1.-W1- -:l' 1- 191-----6WA1-.r�4'..�.dL^ti `IfFF3(`-. �` :--=:L+r4aa^ =.3.rY _ _ _ _ - Lane Configurations Tivi ttt pr ) ttt F 'i 1 T rr Traffic Volume (vehlh) 360 514 8 1 1138 99 14 12 14 161 5 990 Future Volume (vehlh) 360 514 8 1 1138 99 14 12 14 161 5 990 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhAn 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 400 571 9 1 1264 110 16 13 16 179 6 1100 Adj No. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 478 2426 755 2 1726 608 26 228 281 554 613 1304 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.04 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow,vehlh 3442 5085 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 761 937 1774 1863 2787 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 400 571 9 1 1264 110 16 0 29 179 6 1100 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln1721 1695 1583 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 1697 1774 1863 1393 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.2 6.0 0.3 0.1 19.7 4.1 0.8 0.0 1.1 4.0 0.2 29.6 Cycle 0 Clear(g-c), s 10.2 6.0 0.3 0.1 19.7 4.1 0.8 0.0 1.1 4.0 0.2 29.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 478 2426 755 2 1726 608 26 0 508 554 613 1304 V1C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.24 0.01 0.51 0.73 0.18 0.62 0.00 0.06 0.32 0.01 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 535 2426 755 118 1921 669 118 0 508 554 613 1304 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 37.8 13.9 12.4 44.9 26.1 18.4 44.1 0.0 22.5 21.7 20.3 21 A Incr Delay (0), slveh 10.3 0.0 0.0 128.6 1.3 0.1 21.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 6.$ Initial 0 Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %©ile BackOfQ(50%o),vehllr5.5 2.8 0.1 0.1 9.3 1.8 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.4 0.1 13.1 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 48.0 13.9 12.4 173.5 27.4 18.5 65.4 0.0 22.7 22.0 20.3 27.8 LnGrp LOS 0 B B F C B E C C C C Approach Vol, vehlh 980 1375 45 1285 Approach Delay, sfveh 27.8 26.8 37.9 27.0 Approach LOS C C D C Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 31.0 4.1 46.9 5.3 33.6 16.5 34.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax4,@ 22.0 6.0 42.0 6.0 20.0 14.0 34.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+l1),0, 3.1 2.1 8.0 2.8 31.6 12.2 21.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 5.3 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 8.9 a - - - - - - -- HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay. 27.3 HCM 2010 LOS C CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 6 2023 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A HCM 2010 TVVSC Intersection Int Delay, slveh 1.6 WBL WBR NBT NPR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y % Conflicting Flow All 355 + Traffic Vol, vehlh 63 0 104 117 0 157 Future Vol, vehlh 63 0 104 117 0 157 Conflicting Peds, #!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Contra[ Stop Step Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 80 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 1320 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 70 0 116 130 0 174 Approach WB NS SB Conflicting Flow All 355 181 0 0 246 0 Stage 1 181 - - - Stage 2 174 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 643 862 - - 1320 - Stage 1 850 - - - Stage 2 856 - - - - Platoon blacked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 643 862 - - 1320 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 643 - - - Stage 1 850 - - - - - Stage 2 856 - Approach WB NS SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.3 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRVVB'Ln1 SPL SBT Capacity (vehlh) - - 643 1320 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.109 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 11.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.4 0 _ CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 7 2023 Total AM Copperwynd Resort 7. Copperwynd Dr & Driveway 6 HCM 2010 TWSC Int Delay, slveh� 4.8 — m Lane Configurations Conflicting Flow All 13 0 Traffic Vol, vehlh 20 5 12 0 0 9 Future Vol, vehlh 20 5 12 0 0 9 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 _ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 6 13 0 0 10 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 8 Conflicting Flow All 13 0 - 0 63 13 Stage 1 - - - - 13 - Stage 2 - 50 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5,42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3,318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1606 - - 943 1067 Stage 1 - - - 1010 - Stage 2 - - - - 972 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1606 - - - 930 1067 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 930 - Stage 1 - - 1010 - Stage 2 - - 958 Approach EB W13 _ HCM Control Delay, s 5.3 0 8.4- HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT 1NBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 1606 - 1067 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.014 0.009 HCM Control Delay {s} 7.3 0 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 8 2023 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 1: Ea kg a Ridge Dr & Copperwynd Dr HCM 2010 TWSC CiJech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 1 Conflicting Flow All — --- Int Delay, slveh 0.8 0 0 322 0 Stage 1 308 - - - Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y - - 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 + Traffic Vol, vehlh 25 8 264 26 5 239 Future Vol, vehlh 25 8 264 26 5 239 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - 110 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 28 9 293 29 6 266 CiJech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 1 Conflicting Flow All 585 308 0 0 322 0 Stage 1 308 - - - - - Stage 2 277 - - - - Criftal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 473 732 - - 1238 - Stage 1 745 - - - Stage 2 770 - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 471 732 - - 1238 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 471 - - - Stage 1 745 - - - - - Stage 2 766 - - Approach WB NB — - - HCM Control Delay. s 12.5 0 0.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (vehlh) - 516 1238 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.071 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 0 _ CiJech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 1 2023 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest Dr/Summit Dr North HCM 2010 TWSC Int Delay, slveh 0.2 Lane Configurations + + 11� - - - ' 11� 632 Traffic Vol, vehlh 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 292 1 0 267 2 Future Vol, vehlh 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 292 1 0 267 2 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - 4.018 None Storage Length - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - - - 125 - - 115 1234 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 324 1 0 297 2 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 -> - - - Conflicting Flow All 634 632 298 632 633 325 299 0 0 326 0 0 Stage 1 298 298 - 334 334 - - - - - - - Stage 2 336 334 - 298 299 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - Critcal Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 392 398 741 393 397 716 1262 - 1234 - Stage 1 711 667 - 680 643 - - - - - Stage 2 678 643 - 711 666 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 389 397 741 392 396 716 1262 - - 1234 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 389 397 - 392 396 - - - - - Stage 1 709 667 - 678 641 - - - - - Stage 2 672 641 - 711 666 - - Approach EB V%fB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 10-1 0-1 0 HCM LOS B B Mirror LanelMajor Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (vehlh) 1262 389 716 1234 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.004 0.011 0.006 - HCM Control Delay {s} 7.9 - 14A 10.1 0 - HCM Lane LOS A B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 _ 0 0 0 - - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 2023 Total PM Coppetwynd Resort 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South HCM 2010 TWSC Capacity (vehm) 728 1206 - - - 388 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.002 0.001 - - - 0,057 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 8 - - - 14.8 HCM Lane LOS B A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - - - 0.2 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 3 - - Int Delay, slveh 0.5 BT _ VB .VIiT AM— _ Lane- Configurations T 4 Traffic Vol, vehlh 1 280 1 0 293 25 0 0 1 19 0 1 Future Vol. vehlh 1 280 1 0 293 25 0 0 1 19 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Skop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 311 1 0 326 28 0 0 1 21 0 1 W - ��L -- - -- — -*9'•-- Conflicting Flow All 353 0 0 - 0 654 667 312 653 653 339 Stage 1 - - - - - - 314 314 - 339 339 - Stage 2 - - - - 340 353 - 314 314 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1206 - - 0 - - 380 380 728 380 387 703 Stage 1 - - - 0 - - 697 656 - 676 640 - Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 675 631 - 697 656 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1206 - - - - 379 380 728 379 387 703 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 379 380 - 379 387 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 696 655 - 675 640 Stage 2 - - - 674 631 - 695 655 Wal - s.. HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10 14.8 HCM LOS B B Capacity (vehm) 728 1206 - - - 388 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.002 0.001 - - - 0,057 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 8 - - - 14.8 HCM Lane LOS B A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - - - 0.2 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 3 2023Total PM CopResort 4' Palisades Blvd & Eagle RidDr/Palomino Blvd HCM2O10AVVSC Intersection Delay, siveh 100.3 Intersection LOS F CivTnnh Synohm9Report Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 107 32 145 0 24 30 19 0 192 795 43 Future Vol, vehih 0 107 32 145 O 24 30 18 O 192 795 43 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.98 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 WvmtFlo* O 119 36 161 0 27 33 21 0 213 883 48 Number ofLanes 0 1 1 O 0 1 1 O 8 O 2 1 Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB N8 EB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB 88 WB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCMControl Delay 20 15.4 182.8 HCMLOG C O F Vu|Thm. 9& 5894 100Y& O% UY& 1896 89& 81% 0Y6 1009& 709& Vol Right, 9& O% 0Y6 100% O% 82% 0% 389& 096 09& 30Y4 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop 3bup Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol byLane 457 530 43 107 177 24 48 14 208 210 LT Vol 182 O O 107 U 24 O 14 0 0 Through Vol 265 530 O O 32 0 30 0 298 148 RT Vol Q O 43 O 145 8 19 O O 82 Lane Flow Rate 508 589 48 119 197 27 54 16 329 233 Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree ofUh|(X) 1.198 1.353 0.1 0.333 0.493 0.082 0,156 0.04 U04 0.357 Departure Headway (Hd) 8,49 8.274 7.558 10.558 0.468 11.577 10,787 8.815 8.301 9.088 Conva,genom.Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yon Yon Yes Yes Yes Cap 432 442 474 342 383 311 334 367 391 399 Service Time 8.237 6.021 3.201 8.256 7.168 9,277 8,487 7.516 7.001 6788 HCWLane V/CRatio 1.178 1.833 0.101 0.348 8.614 0,087 0.162 0.044 0.841 0.584 HCGControl Delay 138.9 1871 111 18.4 21 163 15.5 12.9 40.8 22r8 HCNLane LOS F F B C C C C B E 8 CivTnnh Synohm9Report 2023 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2013 AWSC Intersection Delay, sfveh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR - - - - - Lan4onfigurations tT+ Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 14 444 fit Future Vol, vehlh 0 14 444 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 16 493 69 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - — - Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 3 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCM Control Delay 32.7 HCM LOS D CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 5 2023 Total PM with Signal (No EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Lane Configurations I T+ T+ tt r I +T, Traffic Volume (vehlh) 107 32 145 24 30 19 192 795 43 14 444 62 Future Volume (vehlh) 107 32 145 24 30 19 192 795 43 14 444 62 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1A0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 119 36 161 27 33 21 213 883 48 16 493 69 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 369 58 259 241 207 132 270 1747 782 28 1115 155 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.49 0.49 0.02 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow,vehlh 1345 297 1330 1181 1065 678 1774 3539 1583 1774 3.121 435 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 119 0 197 27 0 54 213 883 48 16 279 283 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1345 0 1628 1181 0 1743 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1786 Q Serve(g-s), s 4.1 0.0 5.6 1.1 0.0 1.3 5.9 8.5 0.8 0.5 6.1 6,1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 0.0 5.6 6.7 0.0 1.3 5.9 8.5 0.8 0.5 6.1 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,24 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 369 0 316 241 0 339 270 1747 782 28 632 638 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.00 0.62 0.11 0.00 0.16 0.79 0.51 0.06 0.57 0.44 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 532 0 514 384 0 551 455 1747 782 140 632 638 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 19.2 0.0 18.7 21.8 0.0 17,0 20.7 8.7 6.7 24.7 12.4 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.5 0.0 2.0 0.2 0,0 0.2 5.1 1.0 0.2 16.6 2.2 2.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back©fQ(50%),vehlln 1.6 0.0 2.7 0.4 0.0 0.7 3.2 4.3 0.4 03 3.3 3.4 LnGrp Delay(d),sdveh 19.7 0.0 20.7 22.0 0.0 17.2 25.8 9.7 6.8 41.3 14.6 14.7 LnGrp LOS B C C B C A A D B B Approach Vol, vehlh 316 81 1144 578 Approach Delay, slveh 20.3 18.8 12.6 15.4 Approach LOS C B B B - - - - _ - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 $ Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.8 30.0 14.8 12.7 23.1 14.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 25.0 16.0 13.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.5 10.5 7.6 7.9 8.1 8.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 8.3 1.3 0.3 5,3 1.2 - R. - - - - - --- -- --- HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14-7 HCM 2010 LOS B CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 1 2423 Total RM with Signal (No EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-4212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrlPalomino Blvd �01 1 02 --b04 4\ 05 T 05 08 CvTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 Movement SBL NBT ESTL NBL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max None None Max !None Maximum Split (s) 9 34 21 18 21 21 Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 50.0% 35.0% 30.0% 35.0% 35.0% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 9 39 0 18 39 End Time (s) 9 39 0 18 39 0 YieldlForce Off (s) 4 34 55 13 34 55 Yield/Force Off 170(x) 4 23 44 13 23 44 Local Start Time (s) 42 51 21 42 0 21 Local Yield (s) 46 16 37 55 16 37 Local Yield 170(s) 46 5 26 55 5 26 ��— - Cycle Length 60 Control Type Semi Act-Uncoord Natural Cycle 55 Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrlPalomino Blvd �01 1 02 --b04 4\ 05 T 05 08 CvTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 2023Total [»Mwith Signal (WITH 'q8l/WTH EB R] -Lane) CopResort (17-0212) 4' Palisades Blvd & Eagle RidDr/PalominoDr/Palomino Blvd HCN2O1OSignalized Intersection Summary Lane Configurations I t r T+ tt r I ti� Traffic Volume (veh1h) 107 32 145 24 30 19 192 786 43 14 444 62 Future Volume kmh/h> 107 32 145 24 30 19 102 785 43 14 444 62 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 S 2 12 1 8 18 Initial Q(Qb).woh O O O O O O D O O 0 O 0 Ped -Bike Adj0\ nbT 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1 �00 1.00 1.80 Adj Sat Flow, voh/h3n 1083 1863 1863 1883 1883 1808 1863 1883 1883 1863 1883 1000 /dj Flow Rate, veh/h 110 36 181 27 33 21 213 80 48 18 00 69 AdiNonfLamum 1 1 1 1 1 D 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0�90 0�90 0,90 Percent HomvyVoh 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 O 2 2 2 2 2 Cop vah/h 340 317 270 328 181 115 271 1800 885 28 1180 162 Arrive OnGreen 017 0.17 0.17 017 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.51 0.51 0O2 0.37 0J7 Sat Flow, veh1h 1345 1863 1583 1181 1065 678 1774 3539 1583 1774 3121 435 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 36 161 27 0 54 213 883 48 16 279 283 Grp Sat Flow(s),vohlh8n 1345 1883 1583 1181 O 1743 1774 1770 1582 1774 1770 1786 QSorve(gx.x 4.1 0.8 4.6 1.8 0.0 1.3 57 8.0 0.8 0.4 5.8 5�8 Cycle OClear(g-c).o 6.4 0.8 4.6 1.8 0.0 1.3 SJ 8.0 0.8 0.4 5�8 5,8 Prop |oLane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.24 Lane Grp Cap(c).veh/h 340 317 270 328 Q 297 271 1800 805 28 658 664 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.11 0.60 0,08 0.00 0.18 0,78 0.49 0.06 0.56 0.42 0.43 Avail Cap(c_m.veh/h 548 808 515 512 O 507 489 1800 805 144 868 864 HCNPlatoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UpntreamFiltnH 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.08 0.00 1.00 1O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1,00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.8 17.3 18.8 18.0 O�O 17.5 20.0 7.9 6.1 24,0 11.5 11,5 |mxDelay (d2),mkmh 0.6 0.2 2.1 0.1 0.0 03 5.0 1.0 0.1 184 2.0 lU Initial ODalay(d3),slvah 0.0 0,10 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 &O 0.0 0.0 9QleBuoO0Q(5O9Q.wahUn 1.8 0.4 2.2 8.3 0.0 OJ 32 4D 0.4 0.3 3.2 32 LnQrpDo|oy(d).o/vnh 20.4 17.4 21.0 18.1 0.0 17.8 25.0 &O 6.3 40.4 13.6 13.5 Approach Vol, veh/h 316 81 1144 578 Approach Dolaym/voh 20.3 17.9 11.8 14.3 Approach LOS C 8 B 8 PhaDuration (G+Y+Rc)'x 5.8 38.0 13.4 12.5 233 13.4 Change Period (Y+Ru)^o 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax). o 4.0 25.0 10,0 13,0 18.0 18.0 Max OClear Time (Q_u+|1).m 2.4 10.0 7.4 77 7.8 3.0 Green Ext Time (p_c'o 0.0 8.5 1.0 8.3 3.5 12 HCM2O18Ctrl Delay 14.0 HCM2O1OLOS 8 CiJoch Synohm0Report 2023 Total PM with Signal (WITH EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge ®r/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd \110 t f X72 i- 05 � 06 08 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 1. i --a. r 4--- Movement SBL NBT EBTL NBL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None flax None None Max None Maximum Split (s) 9 30 21 18 21 21 Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 50.0% 35.0% 30.0% 35.0% 35.0% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash font Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 9 39 0 18 39 End Time (s) 9 39 0 18 39 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 34 55 13 34 55 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 4 23 44 13 23 44 Laval Start Time (s) 42 51 21 42 0 21 Local Yield (s) 46 16 37 55 16 37 Local Yield 170(s) 46 5 26 55 5 26 Cycle Length 60 Control Type Semi Act-Uncoord Natural Cycle 55 Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd \110 t f X72 i- 05 � 06 08 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 2023 Total PM Copperwynd Resort 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary ''--a.--v f*-- 6-- t /W It. I . Lane Configurations )) ttt Ir ) ttt F i ' + rr Traffic Volume (vehlh) 912 1493 18 5 716 151 24 4 4 117 8 477 Future Volume (veh/h) 912 1493 18 5 716 151 24 4 4 117 8 477 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1853 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1013 1659 20 6 796 168 27 4 4 130 9 530 Adj No. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 841 2441 760 11 1230 453 39 249 249 563 585 1557 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.48 0.48 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.29 0.29 0.04 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow,veh/h 3442 5085 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 856 856 1774 1863 2787 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 1013 1659 20 6 796 168 27 0 8 130 9 530 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/inl721 1695 1583 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 1712 1774 1863 1393 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.0 22.7 0.6 0.3 12.7 7.6 1.4 0.0 0.3 4.0 0.3 9.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22.0 227 0.6 0.3 12.7 7.6 1.4 0.0 0.3 4.0 0.3 9.3 Prop In Lane 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 841 2441 760 11 1230 453 39 0 499 563 585 1557 V/C Ratio(X) 1.20 0.68 0.03 0.55 0.65 0.37 0.70 0.00 0.02 0.23 0.02 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 841 2441 760 296 1808 633 79 0 499 563 585 1557 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 34.0 18.1 12.3 44.6 30.7 25.6 43.7 0.0 22.7 21.4 21.3 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 103.1 0.8 0.0 36.2 0.6 0.5 20.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °!vile BackOfQ(5Q%),veh/k .4 10.6 0.3 0.3 6.0 3.4 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 3.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 137.1 18.8 12.3 80.8 31,2 26.1 63.9 0.0 22.8 21.6 21.3 11.4 LnGrp LDS F B B F C G E C G C B Approach Vol, vehlh 2692 970 35 669 Approach Delay, slveh 63.3 30.7 54.5 13.5 Approach LOS E C D B - - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 30.2 4.6 47.2 6.0 32.3 26.0 25.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax4,@ 16.0 15.0 39.0 4.0 16.0 22.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i 1 ,a 2.3 2.3 24.7 3.4 11.3 24.0 14.7 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 1.1 0.0 7.1 )nferseefion Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 48.3 HCM 2010 LDS D CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 6 2023Total PIVI COppenwyOd Resort 6' Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A HCM201OTWSC Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 HCMControl Delay, m 124 HCM LOS B Capochy(voh/h) ' - BN 1250 - HCMLane V8CRatio ' ' 0.179 ' - HCMControl Delay kA ' ' 12.4 0 ' HCMLane LOS ' ' B A - CivTech Synohm8 Report Lane Configurations Y T* t Traffic Vol, veh/h 95 O 182 90 D 149 Future Vol, vohIh 96 O 182 00 O 149 Conflicting Peds, #/h O D O O O D Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RTChanno|ized - None ' None None Storage Length O ' - ' 80 ' Veh|nMedian Storage, # O - O - - 0 Qrude.% O ' O ' ' O Peak Hour Factor 30 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, Y6 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 108 O 282 100 8 168 Conflicting Flow All 418 252 D O 382 8 Stage 252 - - ' ' - Stage 166 ' - - ' - Critical Hd*y 8.42 6.22 ' - 4.12 ' Critical Hd*y0g1 542 ' - Critical Hdvy0Q2 6.42 ' ' - - Follow-upHdvy 3.518 3.318 - ' 2,218 ' Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 501 787 ' ' 1869 ' Stage 798 ' ' ' ' ' Stage 863 ' ' ' ' ' Platoon blocked, % MovCmp-I Maneuver 581 787 ' ' 1259 ' MovCap 2 Maneuver 581 ' ' ' ' Stage 790 Stage 063 HCMControl Delay, m 124 HCM LOS B Capochy(voh/h) ' - BN 1250 - HCMLane V8CRatio ' ' 0.179 ' - HCMControl Delay kA ' ' 12.4 0 ' HCMLane LOS ' ' B A - CivTech Synohm8 Report 2023 Total PM +Copperwynd Resort 7: Copperwynd Dr & Driveway B HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection Int D6ay, slveh 5.3 Movement EBL EBT VVBT wBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations *' T Y 10 Traffic Vol, vehfh 19 12 9 0 0 24 Future Vol, vehlh 19 12 9 0 0 24 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Norse - None Storage Length - - - 3.318 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 13 10 0 0 27 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 8 �0 Conflicting Flow All 10 0 - 66 10 Stage 1 - - - - 10 - Stage 2 - - - - 56 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5,42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1610 - - - 939 1071 Stage 1 - - 1013 - Stage 2 - - - - 967 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1610 - - 927 1071 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 927 - Stage 1 - - - - 1013 - Stage 2 - - - 954 - m"Gh EB - HCM Control Delay, s 4.5 0 8.4 HCM LOS A Minor LaneJMajor Mvmt EBL EBT VVBT bIBR SBLn1 -- Capacity (veh/h) 1610 - 1071 HCM Lane V{C Ratio 0.013 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 - 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 8 APPENDIX// /7 2020 PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS CivTech HCM 2010 TwVSC 1: Eagle R,dge Dr & Copperwymd Dr 2M5017 trd Oeww, sn'.eh D.5 95u 1-- -- Yi9 1519ES c c NOT NRR SBL SBT Vol, veh-h 8 $ t67 9 4 111 Cvr k' N Peds, A'hr 0 0 a 0 0 0 Sin C.rXdrSd Stp Shap Free Fr€e Free Free RT ChwneF�Dd - hkx:e - hone - None Slarage Lenglh 0 Roo Slop sop 110 - Vehe+MedanSDoW-.9 0 Free 0 Free RT't.hanneized 0 Caade, % 0 - 4 Mone - 0 PeakttourFactor 90 90 CQ 90 90 " Heavy Voir 2s, ,a 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mun1 Flaw 9 v" 185 10 4 2111 Alum rrloal_ 0 Major 0 M Grade. % Cm" Flow AN 461 141 0 0 1966 0 &Toga 1 161 6 - Peak Hour fador 5+a Stage 2 210 90 0.1 90 90 90 90 CMM Hdwr 6.42 6.27 2 2 4.12 2 CrbaMd" Sig 1 5.42 - 2 2 2 _ 2 Cruel H&"Stg 2 5.42 - 0 1 1 6 Fotnw-up K* 3.318 3-318 219 4 2218 bfM12 PptCap-1 ftwuver 665 951 1377 Stage 1 841 - Con5dngFklwAN 423 - 210 Siage 2- 419 1F7 219 D 0 136 D Plakoan uNked, % Stage 1 221 721 - 196 141 MovCap-1M3ne;nv 663 B51 1377 Stage 2 MovCap52Maneuver 6D3 - 221 221 - - Siaoe 1 841 - - - 7.12 - Sieae 2 a23 6.52 6.22 41, 4.12 — KMConhvlDelay,s vis 1D4 -- 4 5.52 62 6.12 HOCM LOS B irroila r } tvad SRT ht3k'ti'6Ln 1 SBL S8T Cap -4 iveluhl - - 175 1377 - HCM Lane WC Ral'iUo 0.021 D -M3 WMCarWDelay(sl - - 704 7.6 - HCM Lane LOS R A HCM 45th' a(vehl 0.1 0 Capperk}ndRmri 2J74.r20i72046Ra-kgroundAM Sync-9R4at CivTed Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2. Eagle Ridge Dr & CloLd Crest DrfSurinmit Dr Norah 211SW17 I" — Ir4 bekaf. s 05 Cappemynd RL -W 2r14r2077 202a 6ackoround AM Sym bro8 Relm1 CfYTef 11 Rap 2 Egr— 'gym NBL 1sT RM SOL 98T SRR vot Veh% & 0 0 1 1 5 5 168 1 1 197 0 Canllc* Perdt r1hr 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 Signl aiwftl Sing Roo Slop sop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT't.hanneized - - Hone - - Mone - - None - - 44one Stodge Length 125 115 Veh m MedLw S€arage, 4 0 4 - 0 - 0 Grade. % 0 - 4 - 0 - 6 - Peak Hour fador 5+a 90 9D 90 0.1 90 90 90 90 90 90 Hemy vehddes, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MwA Fkaw 7 0 0 1 1 6 6 117 1 1 219 4 bfM12 r1 M ` 1 Con5dngFklwAN 423 420 210 419 419 1F7 219 D 0 136 D 0 Stage 1 221 721 - 196 141 - - - - - Stage 2 2D2 19S - 221 221 - - - Crilical Hkjny 7.12 &52 6..22 7.12 6.52 6.22 41, 4.12 CrT,cAHdwyS41 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Crik2i Hdwy SLg 2 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 Folbw-uOldhy 3-518 4.018 3.318 3.516 4.418 3.318 2218 2218 Pot 1�ap.1 Mameww 541 525 821 544 525 855 1350 - - 1386 - - stage 1 781 720 - W4 237 - - - Stage 2 ON 736 - 781 720 Plahwn docked. % MovCap-1 Manewer 535 522 821 542 522 855 1350 1388 WvCap2Manewer 535 522 - 542 522 - - Stage 1 778 719 IOD 734 Stage 2 750 733 78D 714 'WB - — SBF HCM CoWol Delay. s 1;8 16 HCM LOS 9 R Mwor` M.d NEIL WNBREBLr�14Y8Lni 5!L SRT SBR Cayacitf l-le3l) 1350 535 729 1386 HCM Lane=R81io 6.004 0.4121011 4.001 HCM Control N* ¢sj 1.7 Ila 10 7.6 HCM Lw* LOS A S 8 A. HCM9%%&COW 0 0 0 0 Cappemynd RL -W 2r14r2077 202a 6ackoround AM Sym bro8 Relm1 CfYTef 11 Rap 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: E29b Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South V15017 1 Int Delay. &Ieeh D.4 Mlle - E71 -19T W Wk MT WBR�- ML NBr FOR 594. Sr Sm Vot. vefth 0 209 a 1 170 0 1 0 a 19 0 0 Con5cting Peds. Allm 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 D 6 Si acoMt1 Free Free Free Free Free Free 'sop Swp Stu Np SmP Stop RT Cl°amiefee6 - -Nan" - - Wrre 232 232 WBU Cdiical Hdwy 4.12 SNr4eL-0 100 N6'i 1 12 6.52 622 T12 6.52 6.22 Cdkal Hdwy Sg 1 Veh in W&4 Sl3W. - 0 0 6.12 5,52 - 5.12 552 - Grade. % . 0 0 6!00 612 552 . D 5.52 Peak l-lavr Facmr 00 90 90 43 N 90 9D 90 93 90 9D 90 W ,y Vehccles, °k 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M mlFlow 0 232 0 1 199 0 1 0 a 21 0 0 CoppenwymdResaut 21141201720289ackgroandAM Symdr38Repan CivTech Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: PaEisades Blvd S Eagle Ride Df1Palcmmo Blvd 2IWO17 Conk ing Fbwv 40 189 0 0 232 0 D 423 423 ,232 423 423 189 Sw 1 2 intersecli i LOS 23.2 232 - 191 191 - Stage 2 S9 191 191 - 232 232 WBU Cdiical Hdwy 4.12 Wks- %U 4.12 N6'i 1 12 6.52 622 T12 6.52 6.22 Cdkal Hdwy Sg 1 - 15 - 0 6.12 5,52 - 5.12 552 - Ctkal Hdwy Stg 2 - 0-90 090 6!00 612 552 . S.12 5.52 . FoOn-opHdwy 2218 2 2218 2 3-518 4.014 3.318 3.518 4.418 3.318 Pb; Cap -1 Manerner 1365 ,1vmlFk>tiw 13M 78 511 522 807 541 522 853 Stage t - 358 7 Wirmber of Lares 771 713 .1 811 742 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 811 742 - 771 713 - Plabon blocked, % 100% 0% 0% 16% 0% 42; 0% IWIL 63 Val Right % WN Cap 1 A(anuwr 1385 IDU% 1335 84% 541 521 807 541 521 853 Mw Cap -2 Wmetw sbP Sb4 - Stop 541 521 Stop 541 521 TraFitValbyLane SI-ege 1 - 6 - 135 771 713 9 811 741 LT VIA S1age2 . 0 . 0 810 741 9 771 713 Tlladagll Val 107 215 a 0 - -W - ---- ;$8--� 300 RT Vcd RM Cartnl Delay, s p 6 0 114 11-7 ?l6 0 119 51 Lane Flow RAe HCM LCS 239 7 76 150 B 50 1D 6. 401 -,fP WiTaftV.wF RBR -W E9t 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree DFUtdN 0.502 0.64 0.014 0.203 x346 0.128 0.125 Capa0eivemni 541 t3a5 1336 541 6.148 7.448 9.392 8.385 4.881 8,989 HCM Lane Vit; RaSo 0AD2 - 6.001 0039 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yrs HOCM Cbrml l)elay tsl 11.7 D 7-7 0 11.9 444 481 083 434 364 400 W M Lane LOS 9 k A A 9 5 679 5.179 7-114 6.037 7.52 6.728 Fs --M 45th %* Q(veh) 0 D 0 - DA 0-9M 0.015 0.204 D-346 0.129 0.125 CoppenwymdResaut 21141201720289ackgroandAM Symdr38Repan CivTech Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: PaEisades Blvd S Eagle Ride Df1Palcmmo Blvd 2IWO17 Coppenwimd lResort 2114x017 2028 Bxkgmwd AM Synohrm 8 Repot opwsmg ApP N9 memecl" Deby, sNeh 39.5 F9 S9 Opposing Lades 2 intersecli i LOS E 3 COAFxtrm Appma_h Led S9 NB - - N -m am WBU - 4 vw- Wks- %U - ux N6'i I'm W,, veto 0 70 21 114 0 42 15 A 0 87 322 6 Peak Hour Fad Dr D.90 0.90 D90 D.90 0-90 090 6!00 0.0] 090 090 0.90 D90 3 �rY Vetdes, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ,1vmlFk>tiw 0 78 23 427 0 47 21 29 0 97 358 7 Wirmber of Lares 0 1 .1 D 0 1 1 0 0 D 2 1 Coppenwimd lResort 2114x017 2028 Bxkgmwd AM Synohrm 8 Repot opwsmg ApP N9 F9 S9 Opposing Lades 2 2 3 COAFxtrm Appma_h Led S9 NB E9 Con" Lanes Left 3 3 2 ConFir" AWmach Rig?d Na S8 w9 Com" Lanes NM 3 3 2 HCMCarkolF; IW 15.1 13.5 19.5 HCM LC* C 9 C Cuae ffiffif-MW NBLn3 EBL41 EStn2`WRA W&O SEprr1 SaW Ssm- _ Val Lek `C 4515 09; a% ID014 D% 1001. 0% 1W. -m CR, 0% Vol -1hm% 55'x" 100% 0% 0% 16% 0% 42; 0% IWIL 63 Val Right % N 03; IDU% D% 84% 056 Sn CO. 0',:b I -o% S-�nConW Slop sbP Sb4 Sh)P Stop Stop Slop Stop Stap StDp TraFitValbyLane 194 215 6 70 135 42 45 9 533 351 LT VIA 87 0 0 70 0 42 a 9 0 0 Tlladagll Val 107 215 a 0 21 0 19 D 599 300 RT Vcd 0 0 6 0 114 0 ?l6 0 a' 51 Lane Flow RAe 216 239 7 76 150 47 50 1D 666 401 -,fP 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree DFUtdN 0.502 0.64 0.014 0.203 x346 0.128 0.125 0.022 1 0.818 Departmelileadway(M 8.372 6.148 7.448 9.392 8.385 4.881 8,989 7;474 7.489 7.348 Unwergence- Y.W Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yrs Yes Yes Yes Cap 432 444 481 083 434 364 400 444 490 443 Service T ne 6.103 5 679 5.179 7-114 6.037 7.52 6.728 5.716 5205 S.W HCM Lame VFC Raba 0.5 0-9M 0.015 0.204 D-346 0.129 0.125 0.022 1.351 0.813 HCM Carrlral Deily 19.3 24.1 10.3 14-5 15.4 14.1 13 10-9 60.3 354 W M Lane LOS G C 9 B C 6 9 9 F E HCM 95th -t62 r3 2.7 3.1 0 07 1.5 0.4 0-4 01 13.4 71 Coppenwimd lResort 2114x017 2028 Bxkgmwd AM Synohrm 8 Repot HCC 2010 AWSC 4; Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge C1rdPalomino Blvd 271572D17 1I - - - - - - OpRasng Approach Na s'109Laces Inlemedm CeLay. sNeh Conikimg Ap xaad. Left of CoAdogLanesLoR 2 Inb.rsc+Jfr�n L05 EH CuN6elig Lanes ftm 2 NCMCO*aWay �� NCM LCs F SET SB4 Vol, vekh, 0 4 699 61 PeA'k Ano Fww 4.90 0.90 0.9D 0.90 "Vehicles, b 2 2 2 2 My" Flew 0 10 999 58 Hlrtervlianes 0 1 2 0 Approa6 - - - - - - OpRasng Approach Na s'109Laces 3 Conikimg Ap xaad. Left of CoAdogLanesLoR 2 Con" Approach light EH CuN6elig Lanes ftm 2 NCMCO*aWay 55.5 NCM LCs F Cupmmrn} 3Resod 2114.201720289xkgrwml .4M Symhro8 Repprl C:vT%h Page 5 HCM 20110 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 2ASJ2017 ! i T T ~ k4% t F 1* # 1MRW- Ea: EBT Y EBR WBL WEI WAR NX --NBT--WBR 561 S9aMT ` Lw*Co iguralans Jv1 Ift r 1 ftt ( ) [+ aril' vohene(vehll) 329 514 6 1 1138 75 14 12 14 143 5 968 NuRbEr 7 4 R 3 8 16 5 7 12 1 6 16 Ift" a fob). aeh 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-113Foe AdAAphi} 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1A 1.00 Pa}angEus,Adj 1.00 1.00 COD 1.00 1.40 1.00 UO 01) 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 AC; Sat Flow.wNbAn 1863 1E63 1863 1363 1%3 IN3 1663 1883 4908 1863 1863 1863 AiRFtawRee.veMi 366 571 9 1 1264 83 16 13 16 159 6 4076 A4 No, of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hm Ear4or 0.90 090 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 4.90 4.96 0.91) 0.90 0.90 0.90 PeFmM File" Veh. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gap.tehll 447 2392 745 2 1735 611 26 233 287 564 626 1299 AmmOnCdeers 0.13 DAT 0.47 0.09 0.34 4.34 0.01 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.34 0.34 SXFhw.vcldh 33442 5085 1593 1774 5485 1583 1774 761 937 1774 1863 2787 Grp wA 366 571 9 1 W 83 15 0 29 159 6 1D76 Grp Sal Fk S),veh1M1721 1695 1583 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 1697 1714 1863 1M Q 9_s), s 9.3 6:0 0.3 4.1 19.6 3.1 0 6 Do I t 4.0 0.2 30.2 CYde0Ueer[g ,,s %3 6.0 Q3 Al 196 31 D8 0.0 1.1 4.0 8.2 302 Pmp In Lara 1.00 00 1 PO t.00 1.00 0.55 1,80 LOD Lase GrpCap(cj, gs4u1§ 441 2392 AS 2 1736 611 Zai 0 520 564 62c 1299 Vic R3w(x) 0.82 4.24 0.01 0.51 D73 0.14 0.62 DAO 0.06 1128 0 D1 9.83 Avd Cap(c al, ueM 535 2392 745 118 1921 669 118 0 520 564 626 1299 1-ICMPlamwrR7 bo 100 OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD s.M 1A0 1.00 1.00 1,80 UpW"M Fir( 1-00 1.06 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 011 D.DO 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s eh38 1 142 121 44.9 26.0 11.9 44.1 DA 22.0 23.8 19.9 20.9 hu Delay (44 aW 8.3 0.1 00 126.6 13 01 21.3 00 02 0.3 0.0 6.2 InMODela1•[d3Akh 0-0 DD RO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DO 0.0 0.0 0:0 DU 4rleBxkC3dtl[5@%].wehPS1<.9 2.8 DO 41 9.3 1d 115 0.11 0.5 1.0 0.1 12.5 LftGrpDe6yf49velh 46A 14.3 12.7 173.5 27.2 18.0 65.4 DA 22.2 21.1 191 27.1 LaGrp LOS 17 B D F C B E C C 0 C Appraach Vol. weh,tn 946 t348 45 1241 AproadDelay.s4eh 26.7 248 37.6 253 ApLOS C C D C I W-_ _� _ Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Owaltion (G*Y-Rc}.s6A 31.6 4.1 46.3 5.3 34.E 1S.T 34.7 Charge Period (Y+4k). 5 4-0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4A 4.0 Max G'eePSafting(&rra-.9 220 6.0 420 60 204 14.0 30.0 Max 0Clear -Frm19_G-Hlka 3t 2.1 8.0 28 32.2 11,3 21.6 Er4 Time {p e), s 0.0 5.2 0.0 18.5 DA 0.0 0,4 9.1 "CM 2010 00 %Jayr 26.7 - KCM 2010 LOS C CopPewfl4 Resat N14017 2028 Backgm 1d AM Sym 8 Repad CivIech Pao 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & ❑dvewa A 2"I"17 IN Delay. shell 0-9 wo*rned— — WB WBI NBT NOR SSL SBT - — volvehfi 27 0 t04 m 0 157 Conron8 Peds, p§Ti 0 U 0 0 0 0 Sipcwcro'I Stop Slap Fire Free Free Free RTChame9zed - None. - WN - Noft Storage Lwo 0 - - 80 _ - - Veh in M+ dLan Sbrage. 4 4 0 Pakran bb..ked..a 0 Geade, % 0 MovCap- l Marener 0 893 0 Peak Hour Faclor 90 90 90 90 90 90 HW Vellides, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 M,rntFb* m 0 116 76 0 17A iorl Cm kT g Flan A9 327 1S3 0 0 181 0 Stage 1 153 HCMConadDelayIs) 10.7 0 2 174 HGM9ftvie 1ww - 0.1 0 - C*calHdwy 6.42 5.22 412 Crtca Hd" Sia 1 5.42 - - Cnpca s-Idey S13. 2 5.42 - - - - - Folkm-opHN-j 3.519 3.318 - - 2.218 - Po1CaP1 Maneuver 567 893 1383 1 975 !Ae S age 2 BS6 Pakran bb..ked..a - - - MovCap- l Marener 567 893 - - 1383 - McvCap-2Maneuver 667 - 4 51.ar:1 675 - - - - - 9a5e 2 859 0 SNS - N9 -- ' HCM4 Qm W Delay. s 107 g 0 HCM,[LOS B Wm—liowMwmt NBT N -W— wr Canacdy(rehro) 567 13$3 HCM L2mV,ICRabo 0.045 - - HCMConadDelayIs) 10.7 0 HCMLaneLDS B A HGM9ftvie 1ww - 0.1 0 - Capperwynd Resort 211412017 2028 Ba*9 notodAM Synchro 8 Reparl CwTech Paw 9 14cm 2010 TWSC 7: Copperwynd Dr & Driveway B 21152017 Int Detar- Omh 20 MJgverne d MLEB'1 G133T 1r1gR S#� f 7 vol.vem 8 5 12 0 0 1 Cod ctiN Peds. AV 0 0 0 0 0 0 S'grCmntd Free Frye Free Free SO1p Slop RTChannekiad Wrre !Ae hone Sbrage LMM 0 ver in Median Surage, 9 - 0 0 - 4 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Him Facbr 90 90 90 90 99 90 +&WVehides,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mwmt Ftp# 0 6 13 0 0 1 Cvddy,g Flaw Al 13 0 a 33 13 Stage 1 13 Stage 2 23 Crime H6w4 4 12 9.42 E22 Critual Hdny Sig 1 - 5.42 CriticalHdwySil2 5.42 - fallow-�JPMW)' 2218 3.518 3.318 Pop Cap -1 Man%wder 1606 977 1067 Stage 1 - 1010 - Stage 2 10010 Ptabm blec"d MovCap- 1 Mameirrer 16M - - - 971 1067 Xkav CaP2 MaMUM 97f Stage 1 1410 SLage 2 gt4 ,�'-- - - —�------ - - yam- -- HCM Conlrnl Delay. s s.5 HCM LCG k Mirwr r'Mmt EBL EST 'SOT 1A'89SOLnl -- C@w,,ty{weMh) 16@6 - - - W7 HCM Lane VC RVk O.D95 0.001 HCMCaraolNW(s) 7.3 0 ;d HCM Lane LCIS A A A HCM195'h °stile Q ehM 0 - 0 Coppewp,J Reaah 2r14OV 2028 Bac� AM Srxhr68 Raped C1wTech Paye 10 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Capperwynd Dr Z15r2 W IN Delay. steh 0.7 VOL wl* 16 10 224 18 5 198 Cani6clirrg Peds Or 0 0 0 0 0 el Sia Gard Slay Slap Free Free Free Free RT Ckranneked - Nene - None -None Crateal Udwy 5hf 2 Storage L-A 0 0 Fcrcw-up Vdwy 110 3.318 - Vehin. kkdianSborage_4 0 53T 0 1295 D Grade, % 0 Stop 0' - 0 Peak Hewn Faller 997 90 9D 90 90 90 He" VWdm % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MMrrtFlpr 19 11 249 20 6 22D mwm-m- — —}tinct idajar7 — Car4tic N Flaw A.9 499 259 0 0 269 0 SMge 1 259 a 0 Stage 2 231 4 243 Crbcal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4 12 CrbcdNdwySigt 5.42 - - Crateal Udwy 5hf 2 5.42 - 0 Fcrcw-up Vdwy 3.519 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pal Can -1 Mueuver 53T 78D 1295 k -Te 1 784 Stop Stop Sbge 2 BOT - - - - Pblown Mocked. % Free - - MNr Cap -1 lAmwwer 535 780 - - 1295 - MovCap-2Ma7ewer 535 - - - slose 1 184 None Sla w u"di 2 2111 hppnadc 8 MIB HCM Control l7Hay.s 11-1 Veh in h9lediaaSlora3e, 9 HCM LOS D MmceLawJMajCwM xirt NBT NBRy4Lanf: SBT - - — Capa city �vehgb) m9 1295 HCM Lane VPORatio GWe.% 0.047 0.004 0 HCM Contra[ Defy ds) - 1 t.2 7-8 WMLineLOS 0 B A HCM15MMeOtvehj - - 0.1 0 - 90 Coypewyad Resat &14mv 2(123 &8.*rowndPM Syrxfira 8 Report CwTech Paas 1 HCbd 2010 TWSC 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest DdSwammit Dr North 2+[5120`17 Ifft halo", O eh 0.2 l6verr'renl --EBL--`EST- NSL --9M. WBT-VMA RBL NST M — tEL -SBT § Vol. teM 4 0 a 0 0 4 4 243 1 0 216 3 Comflong Ped& ihr 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 SigmConird SbP SUP Stop SVP Stop Stop Free Free Free Free fore Free RT Chanrwrized - - None - -None - . None - - None Sla w u"di - 125 115 Veh in h9lediaaSlora3e, 9 - 0- GWe.% 0 - D 0 0 Peak FbLx Fa:a 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 96 90 90 Heavy Veba .% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 .2 2 2 A9Mrrl Flow � — — 4 D 0 0 0 4 4 kla_pri. 270 1 0 .IAS 242 3 Conk" m' AN 525 524 244 523 525 271 246 0 0 271 C 0 stage 1; 244 244 - 279 279- Sta,w 2 282 29D - 244 246 CrbcalHdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22- 7.12 6.52 622 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Crb:alPd vr* 1 G12 5.52 - 6-12 5.52 - - - Cftal Hdwp Sig 2 5..12 5.52 - $12 5.52 - Fctkw-upHdwy 3.516 43% 3318 3.518 kOtB 3.319 2218 2218 Po[Cap-1 Maneuver 462 458 795 455 456 760 1320 1292 Siaoe 1 760 1904 - 728 fi8D - - - - Stage 2 725 679 - 760 743 Polson bbcked. % MevCap-I Mane aver 458 453 745 454 457 76B 1320 1292 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 46B 457 - 464 457 Stage 1 756 704 726 679 Stage 719 671 760 703 - Axroach— -. HC4ConlrVOela7. s '29 97 HDM Ws B ,4 M•.wrLaaP.n4*W My" NSL NBT N9REBbfWB-b1 9 ff-" - cap" (-MNbi 1320 458 76B 1292 HCM Lane V1C R*o 0403 - - 0.41 0.006 - - - HCM Contra! Delay (0 7.7 - - 129 9.7 0 - - HCM lane LOS A - B A A HCM 95th %tDe €.1(wh) 0 - - D D 4 - - Coppers rind Resat V14017 2026 9ac"tmrd PM %--1xa B ReW CerTecil Pagy 2 HCM 2010 TNYSC 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South 2+152017 IrrL-meckm - Im Delaf: swh 06 Maernem -EK-19F-w- WBL WOT *'ER -N& WT -WV- -- -SW-'A - 1364 Vol vehrh t 223 1 D 244 29 0 0 1 22 0 1 C6nflic" Ped'- hhT 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign C4arol Fri Free Free'. Free Frr" Fria Slop Sop Rop Sig Step Slop RTChannelized - - None . - "one - -Nano 6-22 None Storagr: Lemp IOD . 6.12 5.52 VdlveNuh - - - - - Cr tidrltSig2 30 Veh m Median Storage. R 0 145 6.12 0 - 0 2 2t 0 Grade, % 0 3.518 - 0 125R - - 0 446 434 0 Peak How Factor 90 90 90 90 9D 90 CO w 90 90 90 90 Rmyvalr-rdn.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mxnt Flaw N 259 1 D 211 32 0 0 1 24 0 1 Maps br- - 1 Capacity (-hrh) 71D 1258 - 1364 - - 453 - - ConllilffN w A] 303 0 D 2660 0 0 550 555 254 549 549 287 Stage 1 - - - - - 282 232 - 287 287 - StaP 2 - - - - 238 343 - 252 252 - CrAplHdMj' 4.12 412 7-12 6-52 5.22 7.82 6.52 6-22 Crfica! day St4 t - hers 6.12 5.52 VdlveNuh 6.112 552 - Cr tidrltSig2 30 22 612 552 145 6.12 5.52 - Follm-upM" 2 2t 2.216 3.518 4.018 3.316 3.518 4.016 3.318 PatCap-1 Mamrer 125R - - 1304 - 446 434 780 d46 443 752 ww I - 2 743 641 - 720 674 - &w 2 - - - - - - 720 654 - 743 691 - P3et" tRicicked, % Nwvftr QF Leies _ 1 1 0 D 1 1 8 UwCap-tManew.er 1256 1304 445 434 780 445 443 152 Mov CW2 Mac r WB1_ei WBLn2 445 434 - 445 443 - S1age 1 0% 1%% 742 590 W% 719 674 0.k Stage 2 VolThm, % - - 719 U4 D% 741 690 0% EB W HCM Comm Detay s f' 0 9.6 13.4 HCM LDS A 8 fin-icUw- o tr -M&T :EEL EBT EER will. WRT WBRSM1 - Capacity (-hrh) 71D 1258 - 1364 - - 453 HCM Lane VCRatia O.DOI M - - 0.055 HCMContruicle[ai{sj 9.6 T9 0 13.4 14CM Ince LOS A A A B HCM 950 Wk Q(veW 0 0 D 0.2 Coppmnmd Resort 2,'1412017 3328 BaAmwprd PM Srrhm 8 Repaq CiaTL-h Page 3 HCM 2010 AVVSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrAi alolnino Blvd 2{152017 sLn-trait - - Irrlersedion]'relay,f'deh 333 ER S6 fr9mectorkko5 F 2 3 Corrllicbrr4 Ari3rmh Left SR EK --1 FiT MFSM9--%'C ''WBS-ViW NW NBL hers P� VdlveNuh 0 106 33 97 0 27 30 22 0 145 918 49 PeakFburFKWr 0.90 0.91) 0.90 090 190 0-aJ 090 8.90 0A D-90 13.90 DM Heavy Vehides, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 M-.nrt Flaw 0 Ila 37 108 0 30 33 24 0 161 1020 54 Nwvftr QF Leies 0 1 1 0 D 1 1 8 0 0 2 1 C6pperwynd R2sa4 2114017 2028 Background PM Synchm B RepW DeTeclr page 4 OpgDsinJ Aop-Tach WR ER S6 Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Corrllicbrr4 Ari3rmh Left SR NR E8 C100chm LanesLON 3 3 2 Cw45ta'q Awoach Rqht NO. SD we Cwifidirig Lanes Rghi 3 3 2 HCM CuntmlDeFay 17-9 15-1 69.9 1 FCM LOS C C F -NIAWNBURI 1 WB1_ei WBLn2 9BLnR-M-a2-SKO VG Lek% 32% 0% 0% 1%% 0% W% D'. 100% 0.k D3; VolThm, % 6R% t00% D% 0% 25% 0% 59% 02 100% 74% VolRirghL % 0% 0% 100% 0% 75% 0% 42% 0% 0% 26% SgnCartol Sop Sft Shp S" Stw S4ap Slop Stop Slop Slap Trefhe w ty Lare 451 632 49 106 130 27 52 15 341 231 LTV61 145 0 0 106 0 27 0 16 0 D Thmugh Vol 306 512 0 0 33 0 3D 0 341 171 RTVa1 0 0 49 D 97 0 22 0 0 fi0 Lam Flow Rate 501 680 54 118 144 3D 58 t8 379 256 G -x" Giv 8 8 6 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 0+equC4LA11XJ 1 1 0.114 D-330 0-314 0.093 0165 0-045 0.912 O.B03 DepertureHea4r4tlkll 8.447 8.282 7.564 10.34 9.323 11.104 10.314 5.157 3.657 8-475 Ccimig rm, YfN Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YEs Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 431 4142 474 349 387 323 348 392 421 423 uervKm Tirx 6147 6A32 3.313 &079 7.063 8.851 8.06t 8.888 6.388 5-2% KCM Lane VTC Raiio 1.162 1.538 0.114 D.3313 0.372 0.093 0.1157 0.046 0.9 0.596 HCMCarrroiNLY 73 723 t13 15.3 17.3 15 15.1 12.3 54.5 233 NCM Lane LOS F € a C c B C 9 F G HCM 9%-tilea 126 12-7 DA 1.5 4.7 0.3 66 0.1 9.R 3.9 C6pperwynd R2sa4 2114017 2028 Background PM Synchm B RepW DeTeclr page 4 HCM 2010 AWSC 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge ar1R='alomim Blvd 2 ISM7 wffsfctiOn UeL- f. reh fiB apposcg.APMKI71. C9posk Lanes 3 lwte iart LOS We ConlhctiogLarw.sLeft 2 -- - NR;5w 5Ru SEL SaT Slit VoLveO 0 16 512 60 Peak t1cur FactDr 0.89 0.90 0.90 D.90 HeavyV061as, % 2 2 2 2 MwM Flax 9 16 %9 67 Nunberallses 0 1 2 0 - - CoppervryndREsorll bW20172026oadgymndPM SynchmBRepa1 E.VT" Page 5 HCM 201 B Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 7,'752017 l -1 'r- t'\ t ". "-, -� hfi7va ---Hf-E'W 1'4K-WffF-'M NI§L WEr(- t8R -99L Sl§T- LareCoafiiuraliorvs V ttt Vduxie(ve"j 1007 5723 fiB apposcg.APMKI71. C9posk Lanes 3 ConlOcw¢ g Approwl: Wri t' We ConlhctiogLarw.sLeft 2 Ccolk rg Apomxh R*[ EB Confiding Lanes RgN 2 HCM C4:niul Way 41.1 HCM LOS E torr_ 12 1 CoppervryndREsorll bW20172026oadgymndPM SynchmBRepa1 E.VT" Page 5 HCM 201 B Signalized Intersection Summary 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd 7,'752017 l -1 'r- t'\ t ". "-, -� hfi7va ---Hf-E'W 1'4K-WffF-'M NI§L WEr(- t8R -99L Sl§T- LareCoafiiuraliorvs V ttt Vduxie(ve"j 1007 5723 ? 21 'j tft 5 626 r 142 I 27 'r 4 4 ) 101 4 10 rr 512 Narrter 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 lnPt'alQpb9 veh 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-88re A#,A_LT] 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Padding Rus AA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 t.DD 1.60 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 A4-WFlow, >eh,1Mn 1963 1863 1863 1863 M53 1063 1653 1$63 1900 1863 1653 1863 Adj Fbw Rate, YehM M9 1514 23 6 916 158 30 4 4 112 11 5873 AdjNu. ofLaes 2 3 l 1 3 1 1 1 D 1 1 2 PeakhourFacl)4r 0rg0 090 0.90 0.90 D.40 0.90 0.90 099 0.90 D.% 090 0.50 Percerg14a Weil. a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap. vehh 841 2450 766 11 1246 454 42 246 246 55$ $75 1542 Add CSI Green 0.24 0.48 0.48 041 025 0.25 0.02 0.29 0.29 004 0.31 0.35 Set Flow,seMh 3442 51785 1563 1774 5085 1583 1774 856 856 11774 1863 2767 Grp vchn,{w).Veh-n 1114 1914 23 6 916 158 30 0 6 112 11 564 GfpSatf7aegs),vehUriT721 5695 1583 1774 1695 5563 1774 0 1712 11774 1663 1393 QServe(g_sl.s 220 18.4 07 0'.3 15.D 71 1.5 00 0.3 4.0 0.4 1:03 Cycle C CAmQ_c), s 220 26:0 0.7 0.3 15.0 71 1,5 0.0 0.3 4.4 04 10.3 Prop rn Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD 0.50 1.(0 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c). veltih 841 2460 7% 11 1246 459 42 0 493 S58 575 1542 Vc Rawx) 1.33 0.78 003 0.55 0.74 0.34 0.72 0:09 002 0.20 0.02 0.37 A+v1Cap(c a).xelvh 841 cM 756 296 1808 633 79 0 453 558 575 1542 HCAtPlalaanRatio P.00 1.00 1 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.110 upsfreamFier(Fj 1,00 1.00 1.DD 1A0 3.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UmformDelay (d1,sN,eh34.0 19.2 122 44.6 31.3 25.2 43.7 OA 229 214 21.6 113 lncrDeAay(Q,Wv0 1567 7.8 00 35.2 0:4 0.4 207 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 (k7 lnW0 DelaAd3).sNeh 00 D_0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 as %le Back0lQ50%).we1b98.7 13.3 D.3 0.3 7.1 3.1 10 0.0 0.2 20 02 4.1 LnGrp0eWd)A*A 190.7 20.9 12-2 10.6 322 25.4 64.4 0.0 23.0 21.6 21.7 120 L08 F C 0 F C C E O C C 8 Appraao Val, Vehh 305111 1082 38 Bat AppraacllDeby,V.eh 83:0 31.3 55.7 117 Approach LOS F C F D m- ___. -i---2 - --w.- Assgned Ph; $ 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 Phs Duration (C-Y+Re}. s8.0 29.9 4.6 47.5 6.1 31.8 26.0 26.1 Charge Period (Y-Rc). s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Mu Green Settig(Gmma ,8 M0 15.0 AD 4A 16.0 7110 320 Max 0 Clear Trrne (g 41$.4 2.3 2.3 30.0 3.5 123 24.0 17.0 Green Eat Tine La_c), s 0.0 2.2 0.0 8.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 5.1 KM201OWDelry 61,5 'z'.CM 2070 LOS E Ctglpera}crdltesa 2114091720289ackcwurdPM sooro811epoA CivTech Page 7 HCM 2010 TWSC 6: Eagle Rede Dr & Driveway A 2115MV 1fdCr3e'G�eal Int Deaf, soh i-5 MSL %IBL %SR N8T^I t —S aVt Vol.veh+b 55 0 153 5t 0 140 Con*" Peds, :fir 0 D 6 0 0 0 Sege Carmol stop S°ep Free Free Free Free RTChavnekled - 1,bne - Nnm More 5brage Length 0 - Fdkm,upHd*y gp Veh in Medw Storage, 9 0 Pot cap -1 MareLm 0 0 Grade. % 0 - 0 p Peak Hour FacW 90 90 90 g0 93 90 Hem vebicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvO Fbw 61 0 203 57 0 156 -Appma&- WE NB — HCLAConhrul L1e�4. s 11 6 0 0 HCMiCS B k w Lammao W3T4+ NBT NBFiti4Bl51 S8L SOT Capacity (velvr) 697 1306 HCM Laie VX Ratio 0.101 - HCM Contrd Detay 1S) 11.6 0 14CM tam LOS B A HCM95Yh �tire 47{vehj - - 0,3 0 - Cqw wyrrd Resort 2)142017 2028 Background PM Sy c] ro 8 Report CivT?eh Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 7: Capperwyrad Dr & Onveway B 2t1S02017 Int Celay, s+ah 4 BBFT 148-4 CwffdNFlanAl 396 232 0 0 m 0 Stage 1 232 - Q Siage 2 165 Q D Crbca98drrf 8.42 6-22 4.12 CrIkai Huy Sq 1 5-42 - - CrtcalHuy Stg2 5,42 Stop - Fdkm,upHd*y 3.518 3.316 - - 2218 Pot cap -1 MareLm 6t17 807 1304 Stage 1 WT _ Since 2 953 - PUrs" blocked, % 0 0 wmcap-lMarreum 607 M7 1304 Movcap2Marreumr 607 Peak HaurFa" Siace 1 W7 - - - - - S1age 2 663 - - -Appma&- WE NB — HCLAConhrul L1e�4. s 11 6 0 0 HCMiCS B k w Lammao W3T4+ NBT NBFiti4Bl51 S8L SOT Capacity (velvr) 697 1306 HCM Laie VX Ratio 0.101 - HCM Contrd Detay 1S) 11.6 0 14CM tam LOS B A HCM95Yh �tire 47{vehj - - 0,3 0 - Cqw wyrrd Resort 2)142017 2028 Background PM Sy c] ro 8 Report CivT?eh Page 9 HCM 2010 TWSC 7: Capperwyrad Dr & Onveway B 2t1S02017 Int Celay, s+ah 4 Coppersrditwd 2714201720288achgroundPM synd aaRepod CivTerh Page 10 BBFT 148-4 *�! —SBR VAI, veh,1r 10 14 11 0 Q 15 Confkbng Peds. Alii Q D Q p 0 D sbncowDl Free Free Free Free Slop Stop F?TChawwc zed - None - None - Ftme - Veh in MedianSLarage, a 0 0 0 Grade. % 0 0 0 Peak HaurFa" 90 90 90 90 90 90 HeavyVe*ks&% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MmrlFlow 11 15 12 a 0 17 n[ir�prl htaja'2 [r�exoy2. ConlFcting Fhw AM 12 9 0 50 12 stage 1 - - - - 12 - Stage 2 38 - Cr2ral Hd" 4.12 - - - 6,42 8.22 Crihmi W" S�g 1 SA2 Cro-ml Hdwy Sag 2 - - - - 542 - Fa3nrr-q Hdwy 2 21 F 3-518 3.316 PoLCapl Mawipr iEO- - - - 958 1069 Slaw 1 - - - - 1011 - Staxe 2 99d Pbioun Ldocked, % Mow Cap-lMareur-r 1EA7 - - - 952 1059 Mor cap2 Maneuver 952 Stags 1 - 1011 Stage 2 977 AOOi - - EB - FICA Control Delay, s 3 9 8.4 HCL4 LOS A II&iorL� WM ES. EBT 44'S1T YMSE11- �( Capacity (vehrh) 1607 T61 HCM Lara V7G Ratio 0.847 0.016 HCM Control Dc-* 1s) 7.3 0 - - BA HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th ;tileOtwehj 0 0 Coppersrditwd 2714201720288achgroundPM synd aaRepod CivTerh Page 10 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Copperwynd Dr HCM 2010 TWSC AIN Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.7 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT N8RWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) 497 1233 - Lane Configurations 0.065 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.7 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 5 263 31 4 248 Future Vol, veh/h 24 5 263 31 4 248 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - /None Storage Length 0 - 110 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 6 292 34 4 276 - _- - - -��> _ ..rte. -��`� �_–_ � - -- r=.... -- �.LL_ --_'�� •�— ='.y Conflicting Flow All 593 309 0 0 327 0 Stage 1 309 - - - - - Stage 2 284 - _ _ _ Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5,42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 468 731 - 1233 - Stage 1 745 - - - - Stage 2 764 - - - Platoon blacked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 466 731 - 1233 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 466 - - - Stage 1 745 - - - - Stage 2 762 - - - WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.7 0 0.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT N8RWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) 497 1233 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.065 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12.7 7.9 - HCM Lane LOS - B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 1 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resent (17-0212) 2: eagle Ridge Dr & Cloud Crest Dr/Summit Dr North HCM 2010 TWSC ft " LAW Int Delay, slveh 0.4 - - - — - - - Conflicting Flow All 646 643 Lane Configurations 4+ 642 317 a 312 0 0 318 0 0 Stage 1 314 314 ' 328 Traffic Vol, vehlh 7 0 0 1 1 5 5 2.85 1 1 281 0 Future Vol, vehlh 7 0 0 1 1 5 5 285 1 1 281 0 Conflicting Peres, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - Norse - - None - 392 None - - None Storage Length - - 685 647 - 125 - - 115 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 0 - - 0 - - 0 1242 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 0 0 1 1 6 6 317 1 1 312 0 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 Conflicting Flow All 646 643 312 642 642 317 a 312 0 0 318 0 0 Stage 1 314 314 - 328 328 - _ - _ _ _ - - Stage 2 332 329 - 314 314 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 - - PotCap-1 Maneuver 385 392 728 387 392 724 1248 - - 1242 - - Stage 1 697 656 - 685 647 - - - - - Stage 2 681 646 - 697 656 - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 380 390 728 385 390 724 1248 - - 1242 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 380 390 - 385 390 - - - - - Stage 1 694 655 682 644 - Stage 2 671 643 696 655 - - - - Approach BB WB NB SB ILE HCM Control Delay. s 14.7 11.3 0. 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Idmit NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR i Capacity (vehlh) 1248 380 580 1242 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.02 0.013 0.001 _ HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 14.7 11.3 7.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A B B A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0 0 - - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South HCM 2010TWSC Int relay, slveh 0.6 Lane Configurations I T+ 1233 - 383 T 0.003 - + Conflicting Flow All 320 0 0 327 0 0 649 Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 294 0 1 288 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 294 0 1 288 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - 389 None Storage Length 100 - Stage 1 - - - 648 - - 651 - Stage 2 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Grade, ora - 0 - Mov Gap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - - 0 721 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 327 0 1 320 0 1 0 0 24 0 0 Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 383 1240 1233 - 383 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.001 Conflicting Flow All 320 0 0 327 0 0 649 649 327 649 649 320 Stage 1 - - - - - - 327 327 - 322 322 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 322 322 - 327 327 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6,22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1240 - 1233 - - 383 389 714 383 389 721 Stage 1 - - - - - 686 648 - 690 651 - Stage 2 - - - - - 690 651 - 686 648 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Gap -1 Maneuver 1240 - - 1233 - 383 389 714 383 389 721 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 383 389 - 383 389 - Stage 1 - - 686 648 - 690 650 - Stage 2 689 650 - 686 648 - ;Approach EB WB NB V> - HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 14.4 15 HCM LOS E C Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 383 1240 1233 - 383 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.001 - 0.064 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 0 - - 7.9 - - 15 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 3 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 AWSC CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 4 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - Intersection Delay, slveh 174.8 SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 Intersecton LOS F 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB WAt 01-6 _ � -_ - 1E iEarn - iCG} Conflicting Lanes Left - L L 3 Lane Configurations Conflicting Approach Right il� SB WB Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 81 21 188 0 48 19 30 0 189 371 7 Future Vol, veh/h 0 81 21 188 0 48 19 30 0 189 371 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 90 23 209 0 53 21 33 0 210 412 8 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 4 Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Control Delay 23.7 16.4 44.7 HCM LOS C C E � Vol Left, % 60%B 010 010 100% 010 100% 010 10019 010 0%a Vol Thru, % 40% 100% 0/a 0% 10% 0/0 39% 0% 100% 82% Vol Right, % 0/0 0% 100% 0% 9010 0% 61% 010 0% 18% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 313 247 7 81 209 48 49 11 691 421 LT Vol 189 0 0 81 0 48 0 11 0 0 Through Veal 124 247 0 0 21 0 19 0 691 346 RT Vol 0 0 7 0 188 0 30 0 0 75 Lane Flow Rate 347 275 8 90 232 53 54 12 768 467 Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree of Util (X) 0.891 0.682 0.018 0.258 0.593 0166 0.156 0.031 1.849 1.109 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.048 9.737 9.015 11.067 9.919 12.01 11.057 9.182 8.667 8.538 Convergence, YIN Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 365 374 399 327 367 301 327 389 422 425 Service Time 7.748 7.437 6.715 8.767 7.619 9.71 8.757 6.956 6.44 6.311 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.951 0.735 0.02 0275 0.632 0.176 0.165 0.031 1.82 1.099 HCM Control Delay 56.3 309 11.9 17.6 26.1 17.1 15.8 12.3 411.7 105.8 HCM Lane LOS F 0 B C 0 C C B F F HCM 95th -tile 0 8.8 4.8 0.1 1 3.6 0.6 0.5 0.1 49.5 16.3 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 4 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 AWSC Intersection Delay, slveh Intersection LOS Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 11 1037 75 Future Vol, vehlh 0 11 1037 75 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 12 1152 83 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 3 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lames Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCM Control Delay 293.2 HCM LOS F CiJech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 5 2028 Total AM with Signal at ERD (no EB RT Lana) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 1 Lane Configurations 1� tt r I tT+ Tragic Volume (vehlh) 81 21 188 48 19 30 189 371 7 11 1037 75 Future Volume (vehlh) 81 21 188 48 19 30 189 371 7 11 1037 75 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initiai Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flaw, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow nate, vehlh 90 23 209 53 21 33 210 412 8 12 1152 83 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 379 35 319 219 144 226 255 653 292 621 1309 94 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.14 018 0.18 0.35 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, vehlh 1345 159 1448 1144 654 1028 1774 3539 1583 1774 3349 241 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 90 0 232 53 0 54 210 412 8 12 608 627 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1345 0 1607 1144 0 1681 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.5 0.0 8.0 2.7 0.0 1.6 7.0 6.6 0.3 0.3 19.5 19.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 8.0 10.8 0.0 1.6 7.0 6.6 0.3 0.3 19,5 19.6 Prop In Lane 1,00 0.90 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 379 0 354 219 0 370 255 653 292 621 692 712 VIC Ratio(X) 0.24 0.00 0.66 0.24 0.00 0.15 0.82 0.63 0.03 0.02 0.88 0.88 Avail Cap(c-a), vehlh 435 0 421 267 0 440 261 1736 777 621 724 744 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 21.3 0.0 21.7 26.6 0.0 19.2 25.4 23.0 20.4 13.0 17.3 17.3 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.3 0.0 2.8 0.6 0.0 0.2 18,6 1.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 11.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh1ln 1.3 0.0 3.8 0.9 0.0 0.8 4.8 3.3 0.1 0.1 11.7 12.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 21.6 0.0 24.5 27.2 0.0 19.4 44.1 24.0 20.5 13.0 29.0 28.9 LnGrp LOS C C C B D C C 6 C C Approach Vol, vehlh 322 107 630 1247 Approach Delay, slveh 23.7 23.3 30.7 28.8 Approach LOS C C C C Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.4 16.3 18.5 13.8 28.9 18.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.0 16.0 9.0 25.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.3 8.6 10.0 9.0 21.6 12.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 2,7 1.2 0.0 2.3 0.7 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 28.3 HCM 2010 LOS C CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 1 2028 Total AM with Signal at ERD (no EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd lfly ■ 06 08 CiJech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 2 -- -- Movement SSL NBT EBTL NBL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None Min None Maximum Split (s) 9 35 21 14 30 21 Maximum Sptit (%) 13.8% 53.8% 32.3% 21.5% 462% 32.3% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -'Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 35 0 44 0 14 44 End Time (s) 44 35 0 14 44 0 YieldlForce Off (s) 39 30 60 9 39 60 Yield/Force Oft 170(s) 39 30 49 9 39 49 Local Start Time (s) 21 51 30 51 0 30 Local Yield (s) 25 16 46 60 25 46 Local Yield 170(x) 25 16 35 60 25 35 — - — — Cycle Length 65 Control "type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 65 Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd lfly ■ 06 08 CiJech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 2 2028 Taal AM with Signal at ERD (WITH EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Grp Volume(v), vehfh 90 - 209 53 0 54 210 412 8 12 608 627 Lane Configurations 1345 t r 1144 0 1681 1774 tt r 1 0 1820 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 81 21 188 48 19 30 189 371 7 11 1037 75 Future Volume (vehfh) 81 21 188 48 19 30 189 371 7 11 1037 75 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A pbT) 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1 A0 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehfhfln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 90 23 209 53 21 33 210 412 8 12 1152 83 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 331 331 282 320 116 183 258 676 302 646 1371 99 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.36 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow,vehlh 1345 1863 1583 1144 654 1028 1774 3539 1583 1774 3349 241 Grp Volume(v), vehfh 90 23 209 53 0 54 210 412 8 12 608 627 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehfhfin 1345 1863 1583 1144 0 1681 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 0.6 7.0 2.3 0.0 1.5 6.4 6.0 0.2 0.2 17.4 17.4 Cycle Q Clear(g c), s 5.0 0.6 7.0 2.8 0,0 1.5 6.4 6.0 0.2 0.2 17.4 17.4 Prop In Lane 1,00 1.00 1.00 23.8 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 331 331 282 320 0 299 258 676 302 646 725 745 V1C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.07 0.74 0.17 0.00 0.18 0.81 0.61 0.03 0.02 0.84 0.84 Avail Cap(c a), vehfh 475 531 451 443 0 479 285 1892 846 646 788 811 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), sfveh 21.7 19.2 21.8 20.4 0.0 19.6 23.3 20.8 18.5 11.4 14.9 14,9 Incr Delay (d2), sfveh 0.4 0.1 3.8 0.2 0.0 0.3 15.3 0.9 0.0 0,0 7.5 7.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%a),vehlln 1.3 0.3 3.3 0.7 0.0 0.7 4.2 3.0 0.1 0.1 10.0 10.2 LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 22.1 19,3 25.7 20.6 0.0 19.9 38.5 21.7 18.5 11.4 22.5 22.4 LnGrp LDS C B C C B D C B B C C Approach Vol, vehfh 322 107 630 1247 Approach Delay, sfveh 24.2 20.3 27.3 22.3 Approach LDS C C C C In 3 -_ - =r - _ ei Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.4 15.7 15.0 13.2 28.0 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 30.0 16.0 9.0 25.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l 1), s 2.2 8.0 9.0 8.4 19.4 4.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 1.3 2.7 1.0 0.0 3.6 1.3 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.8 HCM 2010 LOS C CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 1 2028 Total AM with Signal at ERD (WITH EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase t --* Splits and Phases; 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrlPalomino Blvd 102 01 -004 05 IDS 08 ClvTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 Movement SBL NBT EBTL NBL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None Min None Maximum Split (s) 9 35 21 14 30 21 Maximum Split (%) 13.8% 53.8% 32.3% 21.5% 46.2% 32.3% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Deduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 35 0 44 0 14 44 End Time (s) 44 35 0 14 44 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 39 30 60 9 39 60 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 39 30 49 9 39 49 Local Start Time (s) 21 51 30 51 0 30 Local Yield (s) 25 16 46 60 25 46 Local Yield 170(s) 25 16 35 60 25 35 Cycle Length 65 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 65 Splits and Phases; 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge DrlPalomino Blvd 102 01 -004 05 IDS 08 ClvTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 2 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 5: Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary ---4, --1' -V *-- '-- 4% t r* 1. 4 '1 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 35.5 HCM 2010 LOS D CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 6 Lane Configurations + Traffic Volume (vehlh) 428 593 10 1 1313 127 16 14 16 187 5 1151 Future Volume (vehlh) 428 593 10 1 1313 127 16 14 16 187 5 1151 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial 0 (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhfln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 476 659 11 1 1459 141 18 16 18 208 6 1279 Adj No. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 535 2563 798 2 1777 624 29 219 246 512 561 1272 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.50 0,50 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow,veh1h 3442 5085 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 802 902 1774 1863 2787 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 476 659 11 1 1459 141 18 0 34 208 6 1279 Grp Sat Flows),vehlhlln1721 1695 1583 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 1704 1774 1863 1393 0 Serve(g_s), s 12.2 6.6 0.3 0.1 23.6 5.3 0.9 0.0 1.3 4.0 0.2 27.1 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 12.2 6.6 0.3 0.1 23.6 5.3 0.9 0.0 1.3 4.0 0.2 27.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 0,53 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 535 2563 798 2 1777 624 29 0 465 512 561 1272 VIC Ratio(X) 0.89 0.26 0.01 0.51 OK 0.23 0.63 0.00 0.07 0.41 0.01 1.01 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 535 2563 798 118 1921 669 118 0 465 512 561 1272 HCM Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 37.2 12.7 11.1 44.9 26.7 18.1 44.0 0.0 24.3 24.4 22.1 24.5 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 16.7 0.1 0,0 128.6 2.8 0.2 20.6 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 26.5 Initial 0 Delay(0),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfO(50%),veh1ln7.1 3,1 0.1 0,1 11.4 2.4 0.6 0.0 0.7 2.3 0.1 20.4 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 53.9 12.8 11.2 173.5 29.5 18.3 64,6 0.0 24.6 24.9 22.1 51.0 LnGrp LOS D B B F C B E C C C F Approach Vol, vehlh 1146 1641 52 1493 Approach Delay, slveh 29.9 28.6 38.5 47.2 Approach LOS C C D D _ -- - �-1 � - - - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 28.5 4.1 49.4 5.4 31.1 18.0 35.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax4,a 22.0 6.0 42.0 6.0 20.0 14.0 34,0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+l11,0, 3.3 2.1 8.6 2.9 29.1 14.2 25.6 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 6.4 0.0 22,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 35.5 HCM 2010 LOS D CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 6 2028 Total AM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & ©rivewa� A HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection Int Delay, slveh 2.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Y 209 1 - - - - Stage 2 f Traffic Vol, vehlh 93 0 107 162 0 158 Future Vol, vehlh 93 0 107 162 0 158 Conflicting Peds, *hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - 618 80 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 103 0 119 180 0 176 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT I Capacity (vel - 618 – -- s — – - Conflicting Flow All 385 209 0 0 299 0 Stage 1 209 - - - - - Stage 2 176 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 618 831 - 1262 - Stage 1 826 - - - - Stage 2 855 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 618 831 - - 1262 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 618 - - - Stage 1 826 - - - - Stage 2 855 - - - Approach WB NB SB _ HCM Control Delay, s 12 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT I Capacity (vel - 618 1262 - HCM Lane WC Ratio - 0.167 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 12 0 - HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 95th %tile L1(veh) - 0.6 0 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 7 2028Total AM C»npenwyDd Resort (17-0212) 7' Copperwynd Dr & Drivewax B HCM201QTWSC Int Delay, sIveh 5.4 Lane Configurations 4 T+ Y Conflicting Flow All Traffic Vol, vnh/h 30 S 14 8 O 15 FutumVo|.vnWh 30 S 14 O 0 15 Conflicting Peds, #0r O 0 O O 0 O Sign Control Free Fee Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized ' None ' None ' Noon Storage Length - - ' ' O - VohinMedian Storage, # ' 0 O ' O - Grudo.% ' U O - O ' Peak Hour Factor QO 00 90 90 OO 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtF|o* 33 8 18 O 0 17 CivToch 8ynohm8Report Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 88 16 Stage - ' ' ' 18 ' Stage ' ' ' ' 72 ' ChUooHdwy 4,12 - ' ' 8.42 6.22 Critical Hdvy Stg1 - ' ' 5.42 ' Critical Hdwy0g2 - ' - 5.42 ' Follow-upHdvy 2.218 ' ' ' 3.518 3,318 Pot Cap1Maneuver 1802 ' ' ' 013 1083 Stage ' ' 1007 Stage - - ' ' 90 Platoon blocked, % MovCop4Maneuver 1602 ' - 884 1068 WovCmP2 Maneuver - ' 804 ' Stage ' - ' ' 1007 ' Stage ' ' ' ' 931 - ONVOW7 EB WB HCM Control Dolay. a 63 O 84 HCWLOS A Cepanity(vmh/h) 1802 1083 HCM LouuV/C Ratio 0.021 ' ' 0.016 HCMControl Delay (s) l3 8 ' ' 8.4 HCNLane LOS 4 A - ' A CivToch 8ynohm8Report 2028 Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 1: Eagle Ridge Dr & Copperwynd Dr HCM 2010 TWSC Int Delay, s/veh 1 CivTech Synchm8Report Lane Configurations Y T+ + Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 10 30 36 S 280 Future Vol, mh/h 35 10 303 36 5 280 Conflicting Peds, #&r O O O O 8 O Sign Control Stop Stop Free Pmo Free Free RT Channelized ' None ' None None Storage Length O ' 110 ' VohinMedian Storage, # O ' O - ' O Grade, % O 8 ' ' 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vohiclou.96 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlmw 38 11 337 40 8 311 ArISMA Conflicting Flow All 679 357 0 0 377 0 Stage 357 - ' ' ' ' Stage 322 - ' ' - ChUm8Hdoy 8.42 8.22 - - 412 ' Critical Hdwy0g1 5.42 - ' ' ' Critical Hdwy StQ2 5.42 ' ' ' - Follow-upHd*9 3.518 3,318 ' ' 2.218 Pot Cao-1Maneuver 417 887 ' ' 1181 ' Stage 708 ' ' ' ' Stage 735 ' ' ' - ' Platoon blocked, 96 NnvCop4Maneuver 415 687 - - 1181 - MovCap-2 Maneuver 415 ' - ' ' ' Stage 708 Stage 731 Approach VVB N8 SB HCM Control Delay, x 13.9 O 01 HCWLOS B Minor elM Copao4 (veh/h) 465 1181 - HCM Lane V/CRatio 011 0.806 ' HCMControl Delay (s) ' 13.0 8.1 ' HCMLane LOS 8 A CivTech Synchm8Report 2028 Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 2: Eagle Ridge Dr & Claud Crest Dr/Summit Dr North HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection Conflicting Flow All Int Delay, slveh 0.2 744 356 743 745 378 358 0 0 379 0 0 Stage 1 356 356 - IN - EBL EBT EBR UVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Sid Lane Configurations - 4 Critical Hdwy 7.12 41� 6.22 'fir 6.52 I li� 4.12 - - Traffic Vol, vehlh 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 340 1 0 319 3 Future Vol, vehfh 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 340 1 0 319 3 Confilcting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - Platoon blocked, % None - - None Storage Length - - - - 125 - - 115 - 669 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Stage1 Grade, % _ 0 - 635 0 - - 0 _ - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 378 1 0 354 3 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 2 Conflicting Flow All 745 744 356 743 745 378 358 0 0 379 0 0 Stage 1 356 356 - 387 387 - - - - - - - Stage 2 389 388 - 356 358 - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 - PotCap-1 Maneuver 330 343 688 331 342 669 1201 1179 - Stage 1 661 629 - 637 610 - - - - - Stage 2 635 609 - 661 628 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 327 342 688 330 341 669 1201 - - 1179 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 327 342 - 330 341 - - - - - Stage1 659 629 - 635 608 - - - - - Stage 2 629 607 - 661 628 - - - - Approach EB WB - -- NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.2 10.4 0.1 0 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn11NBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (vehfh) 1201 - 327 669 1179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.014 0.007 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 - - 16.2 10.4 0 - HCM Lane LDS A C B A - HCM 95th % ile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0 0 - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 2 2028 Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 3: Eagle Ridge Dr & Summit Dr South HCM 2010 TWSC Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 BBL EBT EBR VVBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 674 1148 - 324 HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - - — - — Conflicting Flow All 411 0 0 0 770 Int Delay, slush 0,6 372 - C 769 0 Stage 1 - - - - - 374 374 - 395 395 - Stage 2 - - - - 396 411 - 374 374 - Lane Configurations 4.12 - - - - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - c - - 6.12 Traffic Vol, vehlh 1 334 1 0 341 29 0 0 1 22 0 1 Future Vol, vehlh 1 334 1 0 341 29 0 0 1 22 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free t=ree Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - 317 325 None Storage Length 100 - - - - 317 325 - - 332 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 605 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - NIB 0 - SB 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 iNvmt Flow 1 371 1 0 379 32 0 0 1 24 0 1 Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 BBL EBT EBR VVBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 674 1148 - 324 HCM Lane VIC Ratio — -769 - 0.079 - ~395 Conflicting Flow All 411 0 0 0 770 785 372 - C 769 0 Stage 1 - - - - - 374 374 - 395 395 - Stage 2 - - - - 396 411 - 374 374 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 1518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 - - 0 - - 318 325 674 318 332 654 Stage 1 - - - 0 - 647 618 - 630 605 - Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 629 595 - 647 618 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 - - - - 317 325 674 317 332 654 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 317 325 - 317 332 - Stage 1 - - - - 646 617 - 629 605 - Stage 2 - - - 628 595 - 645 617 - �gpmaph EB WB NIB -- SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10.4 17.1 HCM LOS B C Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 BBL EBT EBR VVBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 674 1148 - 324 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0,002 0,001 - 0.079 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 8.1 - - 17.1 HCM Lane LOS B A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0.3 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 3 2028 Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4. Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 AVuSC Intersection Delay, slveh 179.5 Intersection LDS F Lane Configurations I T I 1� +TT F Traffic Vol, vehlh 0 116 33 188 0 27 30 22 0 232 918 49 Future Vol, vehfh 0 116 33 188 0 27 30 22 0 232 918 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 129 37 209 0 30 33 24 0 258 1020 54 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 4 Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 2 2 3 Conflicting Approach Leff SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 2 HCM Control Delay 27 16.9 295.7 HCM LOS D C F - _ M. Vol Left, % 43% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 57% 100% 0% 0% 15% 0% 58% 0%4 100% 71% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 85% 0% 42% 0% 0% 29% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 538 612 49 116 221 27 52 16 341 241 LT Vol 232 0 0 116 0 27 0 16 0 0 Through Vol 306 612 0 0 33 0 30 0 341 171 RT Vol 0 0 49 0 188 0 22 0 0 70 Lane Flow Rate 598 680 54 129 246 30 58 18 379 267 Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Degree of Util (X) 1.519 1.686 0.124 0.377 0.644 0.098 0.176 0.048 0.969 0.668 Departure Headway (Hd) 9.15 8.927 8.204 11.489 10.381 12.604 11.789 10.563 10.049 9.839 Convergence, YJN Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 401 408 437 316 351 286 306 341 364 369 Service Time 6.911 6.688 5.964 9.189 8.081 10,304 9.489 8.263 7.749 7.539 HCM Lane VtC Ratio 1.491 1.667 0.124 0.408 0.701 0,105 0.19 0.053 1.041 0.724 HCM Control Delay 269.9 341.1 12.1 21 30.1 16.7 17 13.8 72.3 30.2 HCM Lane LOS F F B C D C C B F D HCM 95th -tile Q 32.3 40.6 0.4 1.7 4.3 0.3 0.6 0.2 10.7 4.6 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 4 2028.Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 AWSC Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 5 Lan4onfigurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 16 512 70 Future Vol, veh/h 0 16 512 70 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 18 569 78 Number of Lanes 0 1 2 0 --- - - - - -- - - - -- Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 3 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCM Control Delay 53.8 HCM LOS F CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 5 2028 Total PM with Signal (no EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge ©r/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 1 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 28.5 16.5 14.1 20.3 16.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 Lane Configurations 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 25.0 Vi fit r 16.0 tT+ 2.5 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 116 33 188 27 30 22 232 918 49 16 512 70 Future Volume (vehJh) 116 33 188 27 30 22 232 918 49 16 512 70 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1A0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhJln 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flaw Hate, vehJh 129 37 209 30 33 24 258 1020 54 18 569 78 Adj No, of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gap, vehJh 410 55 311 240 227 165 317 1633 730 31 940 128 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.46 0.46 0.02 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, vehlh 1341 244 1376 1129 1004 730 1774 3539 1583 1774 3129 428 Grp Volume(v), vehJh 129 0 246 30 0 57 258 1020 54 18 321 326 Grp Sat Flaw(s),vehJhlln 1341 0 1620 1129 0 1734 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1787 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 0.0 7.0 1.3 0.0 1.3 7.1 11.1 1.0 0.5 7.9 7.9 Cycle Q Clear(g-c), s 5.7 0.0 TO 8.3 0.0 1.3 7.1 11.1 1.0 0.5 7.9 7.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehJh 410 0 366 240 0 392 317 1633 730 31 531 537 VIC Ratia(X) 0.31 0.00 0.67 0.12 0.00 015 0.81 0.62 0.07 0.57 0.60 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), vehJh 528 0 509 340 0 545 418 1739 778 139 591 597 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 18.0 0.0 18.0 21.8 0.0 15.7 20.1 10.4 7.6 24.8 15.2 15.2 1 ncr Delay (d2), slveh 0.4 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 9.0 0.6 0.0 15.5 1.5 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °toile BackQfQ(50%),veh/In 1.7 0.0 3.4 0.4 0.0 0.7 4.2 5.5 0.4 0.4 4.1 4,1 LnGrp Delay(d),sJveh 18.5 0.0 20.1 22.0 0.0 15.9 29.0 11.0 7.7 40.3 16.7 16.7 LnGrp LOS B C C B C 8 A D B 8 Approach Vol, vehlh 375 87 1332 665 Approach Delay, slveh 19.5 18.0 14.4 17.3 Approach LOS B B B 8 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 1 Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.9 28.5 16.5 14.1 20.3 16.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 25.0 16.0 12.0 17.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g-c+l1), s 2.5 13.1 9.0 9.1 9.9 10.3 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 8.2 1.4 0.2 5.3 1.2 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 16.1 HCM 2010 LOS B CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/06/2017 Page 1 2028 Total PM with Signal (no EB RT Laney Copperwynd Reset (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle fudge Dr/Palomino Blvd * I 05 4- ■ �6 08 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 t ---r t 1 2 4 51 tri 8 Movement SBL NBT EBTL NBL SBT WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None Min None Maximum Split (s) 9 30 21 17 22 21 Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 50.0% 35.0% 23.3% 36.7% 35.0% Minimum Split (s) 9 21 21 9 21 21 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time (s) 5 5 5 5 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time (s) 0 9 39 0 17 39 End Time (s) 9 39 0 17 39 0 Yield/Force Off (s) 4 34 55 12 34 55 Yield/Force Off 170(x) 4 34 44 12 34 44 Local Start Time (s) 43 52 22 43 0 22 Local Yield (s) 47 17 38 55 17 38 Local Yield 170(s) 47 17 27 55 17 27 Cycle Length 60 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 60 Splits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle fudge Dr/Palomino Blvd * I 05 4- ■ �6 08 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 2 2028 Total PM with Signal (WITH EB RT Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4: Palisades Blvd & Eagle Ridge Dr/Palomino Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary W i-- - - - - 5 -BL MCL t L -7 . - - 2B _ MT. l� SQL Si T 321 Lane Configurations Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln + r 1583 1129 0 1734 ft r I +T 1770 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 116 33 188 27 30 22 232 918 49 16 512 70 Future Volume (vehlh) 116 33 188 27 30 22 232 918 49 16 512 70 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 1,00 0.57 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehNIn 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 129 37 209 30 33 24 258 1020 54 18 569 78 Adj No, of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 372 355 302 350 191 139 323 1668 746 32 961 131 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.47 0.47 0.02 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow,vehfh 1341 1863 1583 1129 1004 730 1774 3539 1583 1774 3129 428 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 129 37 209 30 0 57 258 1020 54 18 321 326 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1341 1863 1583 1129 0 1734 1774 1770 1583 1774 1770 1787 Q Serve(g-s), s 4.2 0.8 5,8 1.1 0.0 1.3 6.5 10.0 0.9 0.5 7.2 7.2 Cycle Q Clear(g-c), s 5.5 0.8 5.8 1.8 0.0 1.3 6.5 10.0 0.9 0.5 7.2 7.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh1h 372 355 302 350 0 330 323 1668 746 32 544 549 VIC Ratio(X) 0.35 0.10 0.69 0.09 0.00 0.17 0.80 0.61 0.07 0.57 0.59 0.59 Avail Cap(c-a), vehlh 575 636 541 521 0 592 493 1890 845 152 605 611 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), sfveh 18.1 15.7 17.7 16.4 0.0 15.9 18.3 9.2 6.8 22.8 13.7 13.7 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.6 0.1 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 5.3 0.5 0.0 15.1 1.3 1.3 Initial Q Delay(0),sfveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackofQ(50%Q),veh1ln 1.6 0.4 2.7 01,3 0.0 0.6 3.6 4.9 0.4 0.4 3.7 3.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 18.7 15.8 20.5 16.5 0.0 16.1 23.6 9.7 6.8 37.9 15.0 15.0 LnGrp LOS B B C B B C A A D B B Approach Vol, vehlh 375 87 1332 665 Approach Delay, slveh 19.4 16.2 12.3 15.6 Approach LOS B B B B Timer 1 2 3_ _. Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5� 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.8 27.1 13.9 13.5 19.4 13.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 25.0 16.0 13.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.5 12.0 7.8 8.5 9.2 3.8 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 8.7 1.2 0.3 5.1 1.4 -_-- A HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.4 HCM 2010 LOS B CivTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 1 2028 Total PMwith Signal EB R]'Lane) Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 4 Palisades Blvd & Eagle Rid Dr/Palornino Blvd Timing Report, Sorted ByPhase 3plits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd &Eagle \001 I toz —004 4N 05 06 08 CkvTauh 9ynohm9Report Movement SBL NBT EBTL N8L SBT VV8TL Lead/Lag Lead Lug Lead Lag Lead'LagOpbmbe You Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None None Min None Maximum Split (o) O 30 21 18 21 21 Maximum Split (%) 15.0% 50.0& 35.0% 30.0& 3H% 36.096 Minimum Split (n) Q 21 21 0 21 21 Yellow Time hA 4 4 4 4 4 4 All -Red Time (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3 3 3 3 8 Minimum Gap (s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce (n) O O 0 O 0 O Time TnReduce (o) O O 0 O O O Walk Time (o) 5 6 5 S Flash Dont Walk (n) 11 11 11 11 Dual Entry No Yes Yes No Yes Yeo Inhibit Max Yon Yes Yes Yes Yes Yeo Start Time (o) O A 39 0 18 30 End Time (m) S 39 O 18 30 O Yield/Force Off (o) 4 34 55 13 34 55 Yield/Force Off 178(u) 4 34 44 13 34 44 Local Start Time (o) 42 51 21 42 O 21 Local Yield (o) 48 16 37 55 16 37 Local Yield 17O(o) 48 18 28 55 18 26 ' --- —-- CydeLongth 60 Control Type Actuated -Uncoordinated Natural Cycle 80 3plits and Phases: 4: Palisades Blvd &Eagle \001 I toz —004 4N 05 06 08 CkvTauh 9ynohm9Report 2028 Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 5. Shea Blvd & Palisades Blvd HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary --4' --0- --v 4r- }' 4- 4\ t /` '* � */ Lane Configurations TM ttt ?r ) ttt ?I I 1 t rr Traffic Volume (vehlh) 1056 1723 21 5 826 181 27 4 4 141 10 563 Future Volume (vehlh) 1056 1723 21 5 826 181 27 4 4 141 10 563 Number 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhIln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 1173 1914 23 6 918 201 30 4 4 157 11 626 Adj No. of Lanes 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %m 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 841 2467 768 11 1256 461 42 245 245 556 573 1538 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.49 0.49 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.29 0,29 0.04 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow,vehlh 3442 5085 1583 1774 5085 1583 1774 856 856 1774 1863 2787 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 1173 1914 23 6 918 201 30 0 8 157 11 626 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh1hlln1721 1695 1583 1774 1695 1583 1774 0 1712 1774 1863 1393 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.0 2.8.0 0.7 0.3 14.9 9.3 1.5 0.0 0.3 4.0 0.4 11.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22,0 28.0 0.7 0.3 14.9 9.3 1.5 0.0 0.3 4.0 0.4 11.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 841 2467 768 11 1256 461 42 0 490 556 573 1538 VIC Ratio(X) 1.39 0.78 0.03 0.55 0.73 0.44 0.72 0.00 0.02 0.28 0.02 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 841 2467 768 296 1808 633 79 0 490 556 573 1538 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter([) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), sfveh 34.0 19.1 12.1 44.6 31.1 25.9 43.7 0,0 23.0 22.2 21.7 11.7 incr Delay (d2), sfveh 184.7 1.6 0.0 36.2 0.9 0,6 20.7 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °bile BackOfQ(50%),veh18P.0 13.3 0.3 0.3 7.1 4.1 1.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.2 4.6 LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh 218.7 20.7 12.1 80.8 32.0 26.5 64.4 0.0 23.1 22.5 21.8 12.5 LnGrp LOS F C B F C C E C C C B Approach Vol, vehlh 3110 1125 38 784 Approach Delay, sfveh 95.3 31.3 55.7 14.6 Approach LOS F C E S Timer 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 5" _ 7' Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 29.8 4.6 47.7 6.1 31.7 26.0 26.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax4,a 16.0 15.0 39.0 4.0 16.0 22.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1),ffi 2.3 2.3 30.0 3.5 13.7 24.0 16.9 Green Ext Time (p -c), s 0.0 2.4 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 5.3 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 68.2 HCM 2010 LOS E CvTech Synchro 9 Report 0310612017 Page 6 2028 Total PM Copperwynd Resort (17-0212) 6: Eagle Ridge Dr & Driveway A HCM 2010 TWSC Int Delay, sfveh 3.1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 7 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehlh 137 0 183 130 0 149 Future Vol, vehlh 137 0 183 130 0 149 Conflicting Peds, #Chr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 80 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 152 0 203 144 0 166 Conflicting Flow All 442 276 0 0 348 0 Stage 1 276 - - - - - Stage 2 166 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - _ _ _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 573 763 - - 1211 _ Stage 1 771 - - - - Stage 2 863 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 573 763 - - 1211 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 573 - - - - Stage 1 771 - - - Stage 2 863 Approach WB NB SB - — - — HCM Control Delay, s 13.5 0 0 HCu9 LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (vehlh) - 573 1211 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio - 0.266 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 13.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS - B A - HCM 95th °/utile Q(veh) - - 1.1 0 - CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03/0612017 Page 7 2028 Total PM CopperwyndResort (17-0212) 7: Copperwynd Dr & Driveway B HCM 2010 TWSC Intersection —_- - -- Int Delay, slveh 5.7 Movement EBL EBT VVBT VVBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations *' T Y Traffic Vol, vehlh 28 14 11 0 0 34 Future Vol, vehlh 28 14 11 0 0 34 Conflicting Peds, #lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 31 16 12 0 0 38 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 = - Conflicting Flow All 12 0 0 90 12 Stage 1 - - - - 12 - Stage 2 - - - 78 - Cri#ical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 7.12 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - _ - - 6.12 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1607 - - 895 1069 Stage 1 - - - 1009 - Stage 2 - - - 931 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1607 - - - 882 1069 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 882 - Stage 1 - - - - 990 - Stage 2 - - - 913 - Approach EB WB Sia HCM Control Delay, s 4.9 0 8.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT VVBR SBLnl Capacity (vehlh) 1607 1069 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.035 HCM Control delay (s) 7.3 0 - - 8.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 CivTech Synchro 9 Report 03106/2017 Page 8 EXH BIKE -1 has to st. Man ` rr MIAA- of Phase 2 lr � < Lrt North Motel Wing II s•-< ` ` • \ 110 keys lwa & r. •ar rte\ `\ -*� - -•%` �A t - .,aotl_ 'Pa" Dov •rr - ea 454 - L454 S L®57' 4r, p. t� 4 -.*.i c as qi RhaSe ap y: 1 IIMA HotelWing, Ezparq _., s Member Facilities, l9an'�uLe' ace ,& Pool Area Renovation + } "� 140 keys <` xl'sting IN 111 s J. rx Ci - ',. } Y r N Ff.12' : • �'/•'ai r' f ` tL�• 1 4 ` t I � w`i ��` .�e �, MT r:w `.� f '��. - � � Phase •2 M(gXNF .,•,,+ . }. �,� "' f Parking � /; .,�s•� ~ �'�� t �. �__ � Garage � / �! ai.. A4"' •� sl Phase 3 Phas �8 z i1 gwet Sp Ge' & Final Room R -a Lm71 •�, b. 0'1 50 keys ', ,.� . ra•4 �...y1 119 Mrs ,a c/. FA ' �"-f,- 5• �. �. �,+� i•� r C TAC N W i i / SAyfp 7$ 1 -�eSr r �h �rAwse ®u,l wnr j 6-+447731. a ""� ,L•,.'- + x °-fit � % "��-.-.,�� Lar}5,87' �. �� r Wtr h3Y>•4 r rfi, �zan'J'L �, 1 ;� I E c'a f w.- r,� .. ` ��coPPEIR .. . v.x r76=,S=ots i VA FWV" A.PH r76-75-4Yr fiHA55 CAi' GGVsw V-A `Q IAp`- i N+V- 1 —� Coppenvynd Resort um N FdurR Mt. A �z Overall Site Plan f Phasing Diagram ANISTS ;6„ Updated Conceptual Planning Package Anen�ParlrersCOPPERWYN RESORT & CLUB a" x^ w' so' 160• EXHIBIT F -Phase Olne Sitti Alan y f • ,. .h9 ^01 .. 414 \ R`Oom Winr7gs T©r.R4emw ain, C �` - ►4'� . y err • �eaJrn. r3 2 s incaf rr,,� i.. - � y z-',ti ` Parkir;gl ,�' _ _ � r - >sA.r .iW o♦ ^4 ^ k8?sting +F � alf' • '� �� wd Enp.ar4dc2,W F&17 0,00 " Ri7r r ...: l _ ❑ [ mg yp„F .s ' r� � S�`N� •�' s ,gp•,. k Ofitter F i .- fdrn r_ $I- ,¢ �' ,, •4, - 4 al t .- Existing :rG updatea� Clubhouse ,,, :�► x k �J A'rriyal To Remain ,♦, - • " t 'qtr "f.A�i' j- ' t �4� 1 ' �. � y � it• ",�1, 3 li ,Phase 140 keys ? •`, �' ' 1 f �` •„{' I Membership Faciiiti_es �• tr4 r � Expansion � E,xflsting'?IJilla"s,;r� ^ ' *� • "ti+.,�. 4 7 `890 sf\o•# new an u® q «,fit: ► l 33, Sac ti •�� ` �\ \� Ir i ,;��'� `��`�` t `1Ii, � � � \\ err- �, `. •. •�'P,� g _. t k: t;,, 4 :.� ».wr �t►.°,. %, ?rte _ � .�• ` � � � ,/ � jy. , � •,��:.r t � s �, r �y a � ' I..andsEa e. �. rI$ ` f EXIs9tInG,� 4gc P / 26 `` Amend'eci` area \Parking 22, .+. • ° q �, r � '� S-e '•' �•�'.;. 44. .. �'•,� �, � T anis to :amain. ��SI ea ��. S \ ♦_ ,., V''`,r1t.. �' 1 L... \ - .. MaYn2 ABrt. Li31 s - wv~ry'•a {'f p�/��1y�'�}r aha. A I.ng tc \J `moi �'1.�F�F•i'Y - r •'�_�`^,. fir.--, rj�� 1��` ;.'�, - � t � "�. \\ � _ - - - -Tr '$h_ o-: a •, Ser+vRze & ,F[YJNU rA Sib �•• iV -F= "shEmployee Parkingr Y B42Bmlr N. I Phase 1 project Data `. _ _-�` {m;.00' l Program�,, 172 keys (32 existing 6 140 new) �'1 � _ _ f�� ' 7,890 sf meeting space •, 178-15-03 existing spa & restaurant to remain �� y 1�� (�QPPER� - 'WA m Rr ` _ _ s ' 714ACT P � x aUr,D r.�:v tlF �}- T+ -" -L7� �� '-m — yJAPN f76-r3-.,?f r.45; CdP pr,U.£Y ,q.. Zr ~ `f •r'f� L,5 Copperwynd Resort ---- 13?JSN Ingle Rxlpe d. Nnt�'1 M7R,. 42 —z�'� IW2 Phase One Site Plan M a&I, va0n CO P P E R W Y N d Updated Conceptual Planning Package Men I= Partners RESORT & CLUB a' 20' 40' so, 160• EXREET GPha.4ie Two Sitc Figh , tr , / Phase 2 ` 3 �r Room Wing i- O, keys "+\ti - r �1 piXtii?unt �v !`�.+Inr, �i ~"\. `� - A �• `-r ',' �t « � ��7 l', ^r . \ =\ \ _ r . v 4,10•., .�91' 0 a.4 8t1 so k an r row j ,'�,�, •S2�b .. 3.. r . WALt iR'�e�.`i°2}�'•' � w` ` , � �" r� ,.�-,�. � � SAS `� ' • 14-28 77-s� L' 1 y r L-454 52' AL Enke?OOf iittter Existing ``_. ,�h ` ,1 Valet Clubhouse ..�i► To Remaf:n � �� •'�� .' �f N14,11 ..,� ;Existing Restaurant r�r✓�,:- Bar Spa &BOM P ,Phase >t ?fir"; w \ 140 keys Y• "embership Facilities EX pans ion•"`' se ., rt,at� sf of banquet�spase' I Eg*fi§ting Nilla`s, r rt_ s ti IF f '-"� � tit .� 1 .l / ll \ �4''l. vJ ~� • •�It Amendedtl" Julc& NX - Lai r <� y�►r Y! A� � 117}\ ��. 7„ �� :.R New rage. I µ J '* �• . �t� � �w 1 r „�".,i� � �iw?e. � '� t Mar man Guts 9, •' y# ? +.. , `- i,., l -j ham_ 5TA C Sdb 1 -� I ✓t Phase 2' .Project Data � •� .{ � A - - � ��`. L=775.8% Programr_o1 250 keys TRACTS x (Remove 32 existing I previews 140 + 110 new t,. �� Ci�✓�" " rr cvAasw.ri ®� �- keys) ya-v-��-TRACTP rAs[auwr '>« 7,890 sf meeting space^rr — — A P M r7e-15-421 °O�ilJO R71 a- SLYIrtsO,Aj/ ---_-� existing spa & restaurant to remain with new aNAss cAF rcu °�„ m _ -� ris juice bar mss• Copperwynd Resort 4 i3X.•5N cnpe e�qe or Fpeni[nn Illh. Al Phase Two Site Plan 08111;.2nr, CO P P E R W Y N D Updated Conceptual Planning Package AReni Partners RESORT & CLUB U' p' 40' 1' 160' EXHI BIT H -Phase Thnee Detail an d Site Plan Y.; '.771 ,I RoomWing"North y s� L, F. tr \ 110 keys r >` « r. , r . r Set k �A"=ice(} 4� , VT da2d5E t 11 - • t'. • r , .. - 1"' ' t..:.a, .�, ♦ ff.'s♦ « . L-454.52' � \ ,IBIke Outfitter,, i .,�♦`',!.> �1* 'i .C- � Existing � � •„ Clubhouse y7!� To Remain' rid f OArri.val f a ' Y yr 4 , 140 keys a1= Merttibership Facilities Expansion. r a � 7„890sf of ban uet s -ace � ^' ��'* r y EM sting V�Illas!' 4l ZY �\kA G \ 1 + g xAr � , Event, r# Arri:val �anClf@t 1 ��+� 'A"w`. Courty3 rd^Resort `. R'd, r.ru sn ori} S a' .�tiR,-!'�is''Ilit�/ ROOMS `^ M� � ��nr ,.. t .� E i 3„8r7.Q1 Sf +I- 50 keys), C1 = • . Banquet space -f X-yl a l M e 1 .w._ .. •_,�*. _ .� ._ _ `y ?+ Servita - - rzwca`w?M r. esaaa�'s+' Entrance � Phase 3 Project Data {Rax L-+rasp' Program,..1 ! `� Rpna�icr:r pOR 300 keys (previous 250 + 50 new elite keys); , + \ ,,.� .r.x rye-,a-.rs - f 11,760 sf meeting space �� y4�� V+[E'°°"'Mr- existing spa & restaurant to remain with�p e� expanded pool bar xrxo ove or scor7w.4.L-/Yn.rx 178-1---421WAS CCAH FLUSH 05 a« �. FOVNG flA!! /' ,� � � 1 Copperwynd Resort �._YMN ran+an lAS. At Overall Site Pian I Phases 1, 2 & 3 �,;,�„ CO P P E R W Y N D updated Conceptual Planning Package AiienEMPartners RESORT & CLUB o' 20' m' a' 160• lon I ,,I ME 11 Ge Ila li'm ig Pop.sly I -, .... 4. , r 1.. t.. -- I- � .. ". +. � low Win Imp ME hm ow 00 ko.6-A lhW I I 6. am 6m Ali ill! I H v fto4jr 1.1 I -, .... 4. , r 1.. t.. -- I- � .. ". +. � low Win Imp ME hm ow 00 ko.6-A lhW I I 6. am 6m N .,, � _..,,;,rte-,• - � ' II1 IUII'Iillt �rl[i :- y au l+lu lulrrnri nrii nrtr rtllt lrtti [int (lllf Illlf - ,. r { P I� 1� i 1 --' .'�_: -tY .. ... -. .{4 Vii. •` :. i ' :.�- .j < �'r • t +`+" _ g �1[q�ARM ! cel l , .f.•. .r fix, _�_-� - .. .. � 115. . ---- .:'�`• J'�!`.-. '� .... `oa*.b, • , . 4 .F wa