HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019.0418.TCSM.Packet
TIME: 6:00 P.M. – SPECIAL MEETING
WHEN: THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 2019
WHERE: FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ
Councilmembers of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a quorum of the
Town’s various commission, committee or board members may be in attendance at the Council meeting.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions, parents have a
right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions makes a video or audio recording of a minor child.
Meetings of the Town Council are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result, proceedings in which children are present
may be subject to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise their rights may either file written consent with the Town
Clerk to such recording, or take personal action to ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may
be made. If a child is present at the time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents pursuan t
to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9 have been waived.
1. CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Ginny Dickey
2. ROLL CALL – Mayor Ginny Dickey
3. Discussion and direction to staff regarding the following proposed revenue options and user fees:
A. Sales Tax Rate Adjustment
B. Public Safety Fee
C. Environmental Fee
D. Public Safety, Streets and Infrastructure Fee
E. Other Possible Revenues
4. ADJOURNMENT
DATED this 11th day of April, 2019.
____________________________________
Elizabeth A. Burke, MMC, Town Clerk
Mayor Ginny Dickey
Vice Mayor Art Tolis Councilmember Alan Magazine
Councilmember Dennis Brown Councilmember Mike Scharnow
Councilmember Sherry Leckrone Councilmember David Spelich
NOTICE OF MEETING
SPECIAL MEETING
FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
Revenue Options -Revisited
April 18, 2019
Financial
Challenges
2
Summary of Financial Challenges
•Fountain Hills is projecting a $4.6 million cumulative revenue
shortfall over the next 5 years –assuming the status quo
•In the past, the Town has made significant cuts in staffing and
has contracted out numerous services (62% of General Fund
expenditures are contracted out)
•Any future cuts will be drastic and will involve reductions in
services that will negatively impact residents
•The structural issue is a revenue problem, not an expenditure
problem
•Council had taken action to refer a ballot question to voters in
May of 2018 regarding a primary property tax to address the
revenue shortfall issue
3
Five Year Financial
Forecast –
assuming status
quo
4
General Fund Projections
5
$0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0
FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24MillionsFY20-24 Projected General Fund
Revenues and Expenditures
OPERATING EXPENDITURES OPERATING REVENUES
General Fund Projections -continued
6
FISCAL YEAR
(July to June)
STATE
SHARED
REVENUES
LOCAL
REVENUES
TOTAL GF
EXPEND.
SURPLUS/
(SHORTFALL)
2019-20 6,220,134 10,664,296 16,884,430 -
2020-21 6,251,977 10,972,228 17,517,485 (293,280)
2021-22 6,290,174 11,286,317 18,383,723 (807,232)
2022-23 6,329,033 11,636,713 19,365,602 (1,399,856)
2023-24 6,368,936 11,860,365 20,369,674 (2,140,373)
(4,640,741)
Five Year Financial
Forecast –
including deferred
items
7
General Fund Projections –major
deferred items –5 year totals
•Additional Staffing -$5.2 million
•Contractual Services -$11.5 million
•Capital Expenditures -$8.7 million
8
General Fund Projections -continued
9
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24Millions5 Year Projection
Operating Expenditures - 5 Year Projected expenditures - 5 Years Operating Revenues - 5 Years
General Fund Projections -continued
10
FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24
Total Revenues 16,884,430 17,224,205 17,576,491 17,965,746 18,229,301
Total Expenditures $21,946,976 $22,690,451 $23,622,753 $25,278,781 $24,858,676
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
5 Year Projection
General Fund Projections -continued
11
FISCAL YEAR
(July to June)
STATE SHARED
REVENUES
LOCAL
REVENUES
TOTAL GF
EXPEND.
SURPLUS/
(SHORTFALL)
2019-20 6,220,134 10,664,296 21,946,976 (5,062,546)
2020-21 6,251,977 10,972,228 22,690,451 (5,466,246)
2021-22 6,290,174 11,286,317 23,622,753 (6,046,262)
2022-23 6,329,033 11,636,713 25,278,781 (7,313,035)
2023-24 6,368,936 11,860,365 24,858,676 (6,629,375)
(30,517,464)
Comments
•Accepted practice for general obligation bonds
is to only issue bonds as tax exempt. If tax
exempt, bonds cannot be used for
maintenance.
•All bonds require interest payments in
addition to the cost of the projects, resulting
in a higher cost to residents over time.
12
Possible Revenue
Options to Address
Financial Challenges
13
Sales Tax
•Increase sales tax rate (on some or all tax categories)
•Estimate that each one tenth of one percent (0.1%)
increase in rates (all categories) would generate
approximately $340,000 in additional revenue
–Current rate for Town is 2.6%
–Total State tax rate is 8.9%
•Unclear if Proposition 126 will have any impact on
the Council’s authority, now or in the future
•A 0.3% increase to 2.9% would generate $1,020,000
•A 0.4% increase to 3.0% would generate $1,360,000
14
Sales Tax -continued
•Actual FY17-18 sales tax revenue was $10,311,582
•$10,311,582 in revenue translates to $396,599,308
in gross sales
•To generate an additional $1,000,000 in sales tax
revenue would require an additional $38,461,538 in
gross sales
15
16
TPT (Sales) Tax Rates - effective February 1, 2019
City/Town Name
Location
E-East Valley
W-West Valley
Retail Tax
Rate Total Rate
P-Primary
S-Secondary
Guadalupe E 4.0%10.3%-
Gila Bend W 3.5%9.8%P - S
Buckeye W 3.0%9.3%P - S
Carefree E 3.0%9.3%-
Cave Creek E 3.0%9.3%-
El Mirage W 3.0%9.3%P - S
Youngtown W 3.0%9.3%-
Glendale W 2.9%9.2%P - S
Litchfield Park W 2.8%9.1%-
Fountain Hills E 2.6%8.9%S
Avondale W 2.5%8.8%P - S
Goodyear W 2.5%8.8%P - S
Retail Rate
17
TPT (Sales) Tax Rates - effective February 1, 2019
City/Town Name
Location
E-East Valley
W-West Valley
Retail Tax
Rate Total Rate
P-Primary
S-Secondary
Paradise Valley E 2.5%8.8%-
Tolleson W 2.5%8.8%P - S
Apache Junction E 2.4%9.1%-
Phoenix E/W 2.3%8.6%P - S
Queen Creek E 2.25%8.55%P
Surprise W 2.2%8.5%P
Wickenburg W 2.2%8.5%P
Peoria W 1.8%8.1%P - S
Tempe E 1.8%8.1%P - S
Mesa E 1.75%8.05%S
Scottsdale E 1.75%8.05%P - S
Chandler E 1.5%7.8%P - S
Gilbert E 1.5%7.8%S
Retail Rate
Public Safety Fee
•Implement public safety fee to recover
increasing costs of MCSO and Rural Metro
•Town businesses –600 (not including 557
home-based businesses
•Town households –11,699 (per Sites USA
data)
•Town parcels –approximately 15,600
18
Public Safety Fee -continued
•A fee of $150 (per household, not parcel)
would generate $1,844,850 in revenue
assuming 100% collection; $1,660,365 at 90%
collection
19
Increases in Contract Costs
FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 TOTAL
Fire 120,639$ 244,897$ 372,883$ 504,708$ 1,243,128$
Police 478,592$ 1,005,043$ 1,584,140$ 2,221,145$ 5,288,920$
599,231$ 1,249,940$ 1,957,023$ 2,725,854$ 6,532,048$
Environmental Fee
•15,192 invoices mailed -$3.00 per month per
parcel
•Approximately 90% collection on the invoices
equals 13,673 payments received or $492,228
•$854,145 Environmental Fund costs for FY19-
20 (see next slide)
20
Stormwater/Environmental Fee Costs
21
Annual Program Administration $24,415
New Employee (salary & benefits)$60,000
Environmental Program Material $2,000
Billing Company $50,000
Maricopa County Dust Control Block Permit $2,000
Golden Eagle & Fountain Park Reclaimed Water Discharge Permits $715
ADEQ Storm Water Permit $5,000
STORM (Storm Water Outreach for Municipalities) Annual Dues $1,500
Water Use It Wisely Annual Dues $2,000
Illegal Dumping Cleanup $5,000
ADWR Dam Inspection & Maintenance $20,400
Wash Maintenance $210,000
Electronics Recycling Event $1,000
On-Call Storm Debris Cleanup & Repairs $30,000
Storn Damage and Repairs $170,000
Internal Service Fund charges $115
Drainage Parcel Inspection and Cleaning $90,000
Storm Drain & Culvert Inspection & Cleaning $90,000
Street Sweeping $90,000
Total = $854,145
Environmental Fee -continued
•$62.50 fee required to cover costs in FY19-20;
current fee is $36.00
•If fee were doubled to $6.00 per month per
parcel, assuming 90% collection rate, revenue
would received would be $984,456 (FY19-20
estimated costs are $854,145)
22
Public Safety/Maintenance and
Infrastructure Fee
•Implement a public safety/maintenance and
infrastructure fee to provide for increasing
public safety/maintenance and infrastructure
costs
•Town businesses –600 (not including 557
home-based businesses
•Town households –11,699 (per Sites USA data)
•Town parcels –approximately 15,600
23
Public Safety/Maintenance and
Infrastructure Fee -continued
•Residential -$350 per year for four years
•Commercial -$400 per year for four years
•Using households (not parcels) residential
would generate $4,094,650 per year or
$16,378,600 for the four years
•Commercial would generate $240,000 per
year or $960,000 for the four years
24
Category FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 Total
Households $4,094,650 $4,094,650 $4,094,650 $4,094,650 $16,378,600
Businesses 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 960,000
TOTAL $4,334,650 $4,334,650 $4,334,650 $4,334,650 $17,338,600
25
Collection rate for current $36 environmental fee is approximately
90%. Without an effective collection enforcement mechanism,
collection rate probably will be less.
Public Safety/Maintenance and
Infrastructure Fee -continued
Other Possible Revenues
•Currently undertaking a comprehensive user fee study as
well as a development impact fee study
•Sell cell towers on Town-owned property (one-time
revenue) –the Town has been approached by two
different firms
•Franchise Fees for EPCOR and Southwest Gas would
generate about $200,000 annually (requires a ballot
measure)
•Consider another primary property tax levy
•Hire a financial advisor to assess Town’s finances and
recommend strategies to address future shortfalls
26
Summary of Revenue Options
•Raise local sales tax rate
•Implement a public safety fee
•Raise environmental fee
•Implement a public safety/maintenance and
infrastructure fee
•Sell Town property or leases for cell towers
•Adopt franchise fees for water and gas
•Approve another primary property tax election
27
Recommended Revenue Adjustments
for FY 19-20
•Raise local sales tax rate to 3.0 percent from current
2.6 percent –will generate approximately $1,360,000
in additional revenue annually
•Implement a public safety fee of $150. Revenue
generated is dependent upon collection of fee –
could range from $1.6 million to $1.8 million per year
•Increase the environment fee from $36 to $72 which
will generate an additional $492,228 and reduce
General Fund contributions to Environmental Fund
each year
28
Recommended Revenue Adjustments
for FY 19-20 -continued
•Early next fiscal year, take Council action on user fee
adjustments after the completion of the cost of
service study
•Any new fees will not be included in the FY19-20
Final Budget amounts since the Tentative Budget will
be adopted on May 7 which establishes the
maximum budget amount.
•Collectability of any new fees is unknown, except for
transaction privilege tax (sales tax)
29
Recommended Revenue Adjustments
for FY 19-20 -continued
•Due to the timing of any fee implementation, monies
will be collected from the fees. Excess revenues
collected will be transferred to the Capital
Improvement Fund at the end of FY19-20, thereby
increasing the amount available for projects.
•Any adjustments to sales tax (TPT) rates will become
effective September 1, 2019.
30
Next Steps
•Any action to implement new fees or raise existing
fees requires, per statute, a 60 day notice/posting
period before a public hearing and Council action
•Council needs to direct staff tonight to prepare for
any possible fee changes
•June 18 Council meeting will be a public hearing
before voting on any proposed fee changes
31