The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020.1013.TCSM.PacketNOTICE OF MEETING _ SPECIAL MEETING �r FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL wi, Mayor Ginny Dickey Vice Mayor Mike Scharnow Councilmember Alan Magazine Councilmember Dennis Brown Councilmember David Spelich Councilmember Gerry Friedel Councilmember Art Tolis L TIME: 5:30 P.M. — SPECIAL MEETING WHEN: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2020 WHERE: FOUNTAIN HILLS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ Councilmembers of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a quorum of the Town's various Commission, Committee or Board members may be in attendance at the Council meeting. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions, parents have a right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions make a video or audio recording of a minor child. Meetings of the Town Council are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result, proceedings in which children are present may be subject to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise their rights may either file written consent with the Town Clerk to such recording, or take personal action to ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may be made. If a child is present at the time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9 have been waived. REQUEST TO COMMENT The public is welcome to participate in Council meetings. TO SPEAK TO AN AGENDA ITEM, please complete a Request to Comment card, located in the back of the Council Chambers, and hand it to the Town Clerk prior to discussion of that item, if possible. Include the agenda item on which you wish to comment. Speakers will be allowed three contiguous minutes to address the Council. Verbal comments should be directed through the Presiding Officer and not to individual Councilmembers. TO COMMENT ON AN AGENDA ITEM IN WRITING ONLY, please complete a Request to Comment card, indicating it is a written comment, and check the box on whether you are FOR or AGAINST and agenda item, and hand it to the Town Clerk prior to discussion, if possible. c. Town Council Special Meeting of October 13, 2020 2 of 2 AGENDA NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Town Council,and to the general public, that at this meeting, the Town Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public,for legal advice and discussion with the Town's attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda,pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3). 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE— Mayor Dickey 2. ROLL CALL—Mayor Dickey 3. PRESENTATION OF the lake and fountain assessment by the firm of Black and Veatch for Town Council review and discussion. 4. CONSIDERATION OF Purchasing three (3) Check Valves for the fountain in an amount not to exceed $85,000. 5. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted in accordance with the statement filed by the Town Council with the Town Clerk. Dated this e day of LL/ ,2020. Eli abeth A. e,MMC,Town Clerk The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities.Please call 480-816-5199(voice) or 1-800-367-8939(TDD)48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain agenda information in large print format.Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the Council with this agenda are available for review in the Clerk's Office. ITEM 3. Meeting Date: 10/13/2020 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT Meeting Type: Town Council Special Meeting Agenda Type: Regular Agenda Submitting Department: Community Services Prepared by: Jamie Salentine, Executive Assistant Staff Contact Information: Rachael Goodwin, Community Services Director Request to Town Council Special Meeting (Agenda Language): PRESENTATION OF the lake and fountain assessment by the firm of Black and Veatch for Town Council review and discussion. Staff Summary (Background) In April 2020, the Town Council approved a contract with Black and Veatch Engineering to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the fountain, lake, and associated operating systems. With the fountain approaching its 50-year milestone, this assessment is intended to determine the current condition of the facilities and potential repair and replacement needs for our community icon. Black and Veatch began its analysis in May and have performed multiple inspections and tests to benchmark the current condition of the fountain, lake, and supporting components. Throughout the summer the engineering team conducted multiple tests to determine the condition of the liner. Divers took numerous sediment depth measurements and conducted visual inspections throughout the perimeter of the lake where the liner is attached to the concrete shoreline. The team also conducted an evaporation analysis of the lake over a 10-day period to test for evidence of leaks. Electrical component testing was also conducted, including an arc flash and short circuit analysis, as well as evaluating the feasibility of a variable frequency drive to control the pump system. Mechanical testing, including pressure testing, video scoping, and diver evaluations of submerged equipment were also conducted during this time The team also evaluated the current irrigation system with consideration of installing a double loop system and the possibility of a direct feed water source from the Fountain Hills Sanitary District, in order to improve irrigation water quality as a means to improve plant and turf health. All components within the evaluation have been assessed and scored within two ranking systems: the Likelihood of Failure (LOF) and Consequence of Failure (COF). Both scales use a weighted scoring method that account for multiple factors within the associated systems. The Failure matrix accounts for the age, condition, performance, reliability, redundancy, and maintenance of the system components. The Consequence matrix considers the environmental, safety, financial, regulatory and community impacts should a system go down. These two scoring systems combine to help understand the current benchmark of each component within the lake, fountain, and irrigation operation. Based on this scoring scale, each evaluated item was assigned a value and charted to show its overall score and its potential failure impacts. This scoring system should be taken into consideration in future budget discussions as staff and Council plan for recommended replacements, upgrades, and other improvements. The findings from the initial assessment are attached. The comprehensive analysis has yielded numerous discoveries as highlighted below. • A visual inspection of the liner via divers was conducted and returned no evidence of leaking, tearing or other compromises in the integrity of the lake liner. An additional evaporation test further confirms this finding. • Pumps, valves and other mechanical equipment are showing wear and will require some maintenance and repair efforts. • Irrigation output (reducing the watering window within park) will require additional flow capacity and an increase in mainline and pump sizing. • Electrical systems including transformers, switchgear and controllers exceed manufactures life expectancy and do not pose immediate concern of failure • Converting to a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) for fountain pump operation is not recommended. Assessment shows capital expense exceeds the expected electrical savings. Recommended considerations and actions include: • Immediate upgrade and replacement of fountain check valves • Immediate repairs to damaged grates in fountain wet well inlet • Install arc flash labels • Consider new control panel with cellular link The next phase of the assessment consists of identifying the process for removing and replacing the laker liner including options for water drainage, sediment removal, wildlife remediation, environmental impacts, and other related tasks. Staff anticipates briefing the Town Council at a future workshop in the spring of 2021 regarding this complex process. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle N/A Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendations) As this is a presentation for review and discussion by the Town Council, there is no staff recommendation at this time. SUGGESTED MOTION As this is a presentation for review and discussion by the Town Council, there is no suggested motion for action on this item. Attachments Fountain Rehab Presentation Inbox Community Services Director Finance Director Town Attorney Town Manager Form Started By: Jamie Salentine Final Approval Date: 10/06/2020 Form Review Reviewed By Rachael Goodwin David Pock Aaron D. Arnson Grady E. Miller Date 10/05/2020 05:47 PM 10/05/2020 08:29 PM 10/06/2020 11:01 AM 10/06/2020 11:18 AM Started On: 09/08/2020 03:43 PM FOUNTAIN REHABILITATION STUDY TOWN COUNCIL PRESENTATION I OCTOBER 13, 2020 BLACK & VEATCH www.fh.az.gov . , -� At Agenda 9 f 4�l fh.f+ ix A, • Introduction • Black & Veatch Project Overview • Fountain Lake Overview • Asset Assessment Criteria/Weighting • Findings and Recommended Improvements • Conclusions • Council Feedback/ Direction www.fh.az.gov or Project Overview • Fountain's importance to the Town ►TI 71,ze ^;7a"qM' rat at .50 • Assess fountain assets • Mechanical & electrical systems, lake liner, and irrigation system • Recommend rehabilitation and improvement options WORLD'S HIGHEST FOUNTAIN COMPLETED IN 1970 FROM A 28 ACRE MAN—MADE LAKE IT SENDS A STREAM 560 FEET HIGH •- 60 FEET HIGHER THAN PITTSBURGH S MINT FOUNTAIN — 5 FEET HIGHER THAN THE WASHINGTON MONUMENT 3 TIMES HIGHER THAN OLD FAITHFUL GEYSER. RECLAIMED WATER IS USED IN THE ". KE AND FOUNTAIN. COURTESY OF _ aLthu Ea 10F co"" ElSCE www.fh.az.gov FOUNTAIN LAKE OVERVIEW www.fh.az.gov Pump System www.fh.az.gov f 'y Lily Structure www.fh.az.gov Irrigation System www.fh.az.gov -� Electricala� System f LL . — 5 A [7 � r www.fh.az.gov ASSET ASSESSMENT CRITERIA/ WEIGHTING www.fh.az.gov t jaie-ft -! LOF Score: wtd 3.1 Likelihood of Failure (LOF) Criteria 95% of expected 50% of expected 20% 25% of expected life 10% of expected life life / new life 25% Like new Good condition nor repairs, Fcapablmeof Poor — repeated repairs operating / difficult to operate Sufficient capacity Under/over- Sufficient capacity / Unable to meet peak 15% / appropriate utilized or sized / does not meet capacity needs function O&M issues functional requirement Out of service Virtually always Increased OOS / difficult 15% (OOS) very short OOS moderate period operational to return to service periods Preventative Corrective Increasing PM & 20% Maintenance (PM) Maintenance (CM) Above average CM monitoring only becoming dominant 5% Full redundancy >75% redundancy >50% redundancy >25% redundancy 5% of expected life / close to failure Close to failure / failed Unable to meet current average capacity needs Extensive OOS / very difficult to return to service / parts no longer available 19 Frequent CM w/ failures No redundancy www.fh.az.gov Consequence of Failure (COF) Criteria 20% 15% 20% 10% 35% COF Score: wtd 2.85 No risk Little risk to employee/public / In secure area Easy to repair / no additional costs Failure no environmental impact Little to no impact Localized/ low level impact Near miss / Unmonitored secure area Repaired in house in short duration / <$10k Failure causes minor permit violation Minimal business disruption / intermittent odor Temporary environmental damage Minor injury / In non -secure area Outside contractor <month to return to service / <$50k Failure causes permit violation Nighttime business disruption / minor persistent odor Major environmental damage / potential loss of wildlife Lost time injury/ Non - secure area & theft possible Outside contractor needed, >month return to service / collateral damage / <$250k Failure causes repeated permit violations Major business disruption / persistent odor Severe long term environmental damage /wildlife Serious injury / Non - secure area & theft likely Specialty contractor needed, several months / collateral damage />$250k Failure causes significant non- compliance, EPA/Agency fines Significant business disruption / severe persistent odor www.fh.az.gov f f 5.00 f.6j+ is � 4.50 4.00 L 3.50 LL 4- 0 3.00 Q) u 2.50 2.00 N O 1.50 U 1.00 0.50 Condition Assessment Scoring LikV_; uuu Ul IallulC 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 • Irrigation Civil -Mechanical Electrical - I&C www.fh.az.gov AL IN 4rt-t FINDINGSAND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS www.fh.az.gov CIVIL/MECHANICAL SYSTEMS www.fh.az.gov Civil / Mechanical Condition Scoring 5 4.5 • Equipment in Z3 4 — Study: '� 3.5 4- 0 • Fountain Pumps, Q) 3 valves, pipe, screen Q) 25 gates • Lake liner, fountain 2 0 nozzle, fountain U 1.5 structure 1 0.5 Fountain Structure Fountain Nozzl e Liner IrrigationPump2 Discharge P ping Chemical Injection. . a Strainer Pump 1 Pump 2 11 . Pump3 Likelihood of Failure 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Screen Gates #1-#4 . Gate Valve 1 Gate Valve 2 Gate Valve 3 Screen Gates #5 . Irrigation Pump 1 . Check Valve 1 CheckValve2 Ch e ck Valve 3 Jockey Pump . 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 www.fh.az.gov Lake Liner— I Physical Inspection 41 i 4r 1.4j- r L t • r-r+ .. � r� r + � T www.fh.az.gov Lake Liner— Physical Inspection A-5 � F src A•= ! current orient screen . r •+r rot correct orientation of gate in of channel (screens #144) LOOK -IN NCDFL'TLI 02 top down view of current gate posi ion Typical liner connection (circa 2000) Screen Gate #5 damaged; not provide pump protection www.fh.az.gov Lake Liner— Evaporation Testing 09-14-2020 09-15-2020 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Cumulative Fountain Hills Lake and Measured Evaporation 09-16-2020 09-17-2020 09-18-2020 09-19-2020 09-20-2020 09-21-2020 09-22-2020 Measured Pan & AZM ET Evaporation ,/j'bIX]Wlkly"T/=Ij`bZIIWI1y,Z1 Measured Lake Evaporation Cumulative Lake Drawdown (in) Cumulative Measured Pan Evaporation (in) Cumulative AZMET Evaporation (in) Lake Liner is in good condition; no indication of leakage www.fh.az.gov f 'y Lily Structure Issue: No noticeable concrete cracking or spalling; minor consistent concrete degradation Platform in good condition Recommended Option ($$): Continued regular inspection; Cost Indicator: $$ _ <$20,000 $$$ _ <$50,000 $$$$ _ <$100,000 $$$$$ _ <$500,000 $$$$$$ _ >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov 71 f Fountain Pum .:0 Issue: Baseplate & minor pump head corrosion, missing anchors, poor grout condition; Pump components at varying ages and serviceability Recommended Option ($$): Continued regular maintenance • Sandblast and recoat pump shaft, bowls, head, motor • Routine checks of tolerances Cost Indicator: $$ _ <$20,000 $$$ _ <$50,000 $$$$ _ <$1001000 $$$$$ _ <$500,000 $$$$$$ _ >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov zi a Check Valves Issue: Accelerated wear; frequently "stuck" open & requires manual intervention; if one fails — fountain will not operate. Position switches in poor condition. Recommended Option ($$$): Replace w/ valve designed for service / longevity Alternative Option ($$): Replace in -kind Ar, II Cost Indicator: $$ = <$20,000 $$$ = <$50,000 $$$$ = <$100,000 $$$$$ = <$500,000 $$$$$$ = >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov 22 0. Check Valve History LifZJ4+ is Previous: Cla-Val Control Valve - Pilot system - frequently clogged - Maintenance Records indicate $40,000 in repairs during a 4-year period - $$ (each) Current: Crane Swing Check Valve - Not intended for high velocity - Operation hindered by valve design - Short life -cycle - $ (each) Proposed: DeZu ri k Swing Check Valve - Rated for high pressure & velocity application - Longer life -cycle - $$ (each) www.rn.az.eov IRRIGATION SYSTEM www.fh.az.gov Irrigation Assessment Scoring • Equipment in Study: • Controllers, valves, pipes, and turf 5.00 4.50 L Z3 4.00 LL L- 3.50 O U 3.00 2.50 (n 2.00 C O U 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 www.fh.az.gov Irrigation System Issue: System undersized; constant irrigation system clogging causes incorrect perception of poor turf quality Recommended Option ($$$$$$): Replacement of irrigation system & controller and upsize main pipelines Alternative Option ($$): Keep existing system, additional maintenance hours with continued negative public perception Alternative Option ($$$$$$): Irrigate w/ non -lake water (separate storage tank). Potential to negative impact lake aquatic life due to increased salinity. Cost Indicator: $$ = <$20,000 $$$ = <$50,000 $$$$ = <$1001000 $$$$$ = <$500,000 $$$$$$ = >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov ELECTRICAL/ I&C SYSTEMS www.fh.az.gov Electrical / I 5.00 4.50 • Equipment in 4.00 - Study: LJL- 3.50 4— 0 • Switchboard, a) 3.00 Transformers, Panelboards, 2.50 Motor Control Line C 200 U Control Panels p> > U 1.50 Instrumentation 1.00 0.50 0.00 - 0.00 &C Assessment Scoring L11\CIII I%JlJU VI 1 UII1.1I C 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 www.fh.az.gov Fountain Pump Variable Speed Drives Issue: Fountain pump motors lack speed control; less energy efficient Recommended Option (0$): Maintain existing constant speed motors due to short duration of operation • capital expense exceeds electrical savings over VFD lifespan Alternative Option ($$$$$-$$$$$$): Install VFDs, new outdoor switchboard; building modifications required to meet Code; additional cooling, new conduit and cable Cost Indicator: $$ = <$20,000 $$$ = <$50,000 $$$$ = <$100,000 $$$$$ = <$500,000 $$$$$$ = >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov .b , rZ 5 j + 5� Fountain Control System Issue: Fountain control panel lacks communication to Town n etwo rk Recommended Option ($$$): Install new control panel with PLC and add cellular link • PLC can provide real time data to O&M staff for equipment status; provide fountain status to website for public (countdown or if too windy) • Cellular link can include irrigation system information Alternative Option (0$): Maintain existing control panel Cost Indicator: $$ = <$20,000 $$$ = <$50,000 $$$$ _ <$100,000 = <$500,000 $$$$$$ = >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov Motor Control Lineup Issue: Age exceeds manufacturer's life expectancy; lacks modern safety Recommended Option ($$$$): Refurbish equipment using Direct Replacement Kit coupled with field testing to modernize & extend life expectancy Alternative Option ($$): Annual Routine Maintenancew/ regular inspection Alternative Option ($$$$$): Full Replacement MAINTENANCE GENERAL lnspectron should be done on a regular basis. The contactor should be inspected weekly under intermit• tent operating conditions where frequent starting is required Whan used for longer, continuous -duty cycles. a less frequent iinapection interval can be established. If contactor is operating in dirty or contaniinared atmosphere, more frequent inspection intervals are desirable. From Square D Service Manual, 1969 Cost Indicator: $$ = <$20,000 $$$ = <$50,000 $$$$ = <$100,000 $$$$$ = <$500,000 $$$$$$ = >$500,000 www.fh.az.gov Arc Flash & Short Circuit Analysis Arc Flash Analysis — Code recommended safety analysis to prevent personnel / equipment damage when working on "live" equipment Short -Circuit Analysis — identifies if only the upstream device trips if fault occurs • All existing electrical equipment adequately rated to withstand maximum fault levels Recommendation ($): Install arc flash & shock risk labels on all existing electrical equipment. A WARNING Are Flash and Shock Risk Appropriate PPE Required Per TPA 70E 2400 VAC Shock Hazard when cover is removed 55 in Arc Flash Boundary 3_55 callcml',2 Arc Flash Hazard at 4a In 60 in Limiled Appmach Boundary 26 in restricted Approach Boundary Equipment: MCLU �« TOWN OF Owner, FOUNTAIN HILLS 0" i Contact Info: (xxx) XXX-xxxx '.�+ ".Study U-tp: OW25120 blaming' Changes in equipment settings or system -cD figuration will Invalidate the calculated Values and PPE requirements www.fh.az.gov CONCLUSIONS BLACK & VEATCH www.fh.az.gov Conclusions • Some equipment exceeds typical useful life but in good condition; extend life with additional specialized maintenance and testing • Immediate Recommendations: • Replace check valves • Repair pump house intake screen • Install arc flash labels on electrical equipment • Upgrade to PLC control NEXT STEPS • Plan /logistics for future liner repair /replacement www.fh.az.gov COUNCIL FEEDBACK/ DIRECTION BLACK & VEATCH www.fh.az.gov Additional Slides BLACK & VEATCH www.fh.az.gov Arc Flash Boundary Equal to 1.2 Calfcmz up to 12 Calfcmz Restricted Approach Boundary Limited Approach Greater than 12 Cal/cm2 y (Location may vary in respect to other boundaries) Arc -rated clothing with an arc rating equal to or greater than the estimated incident energy Long -sleeve shirt and pants or coverall or arc flash suit Arc -rated face shield and arc -rated balaclava or arc flash suit hood Arc -rated outerwear (e.g. jacket, parka, rainwear, hard hat liner) Heavy-duty Leather Gloves or arc -rated gloves, or rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors Hard hat Safety Glasses or safety goggles Hearing Protection Leather footwear Arc -rated clothing with an arc rating equal to or greater than the estimated incident energy Long -sleeve shirt and pants or coverall or arc flash suit Arc -rated arc flash suit hood Arc -rated outerwear (e,g. jacket, parka, rainwear, hard hat liner) Arc -rated gloves or rubber insulating gloves with leather protectors Hard hat Safety Glasses or safety goggles Hearing Protection Leather footwear www.fh.az.gov ITEM 4. Meeting Date: 10/13/2020 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT Meeting Type: Town Council Special Meeting Agenda Type: Regular Agenda Submitting Department: Community Services Prepared by: Jamie Salentine, Executive Assistant Staff Contact Information: Rachael Goodwin, Community Services Director Request to Town Council Special Meeting (Agenda Language): CONSIDERATION OF Purchasing three (3) Check Valves for the fountain in an amount not to exceed $85,000. Staff Summary (Background) The town's namesake fountain currently operates on three pumps, each powered by a 600hp motor. Each of these pumps is equipped with a check valve to regulate pressure within the system. The valves act as a failsafe for the fountain and if the check valve malfunctions, the associated pump shuts down. Currently, two of three check valves have failed and their associated pumps are out of service. The valves require immediate replacement in order to restore standard fountain operations. The current valves were installed between 2014 and 2016. At that time, the existing valves (Cla-Val brand) required substantial staff time and budget for upkeep, including daily cleaning, intensive maintenance, and regular repairs by outside contractors. The internal diaphragm mechanism of the system also required a clean water source for constant flushing which was both impractical and an added expense. Staff worked Precision Electric to identify a valve alternative that was more efficient, less costly, and less problematic. The replacements were installed and required minimal maintenance beyond standard preventive care. In the winter of 2020, intermittent failures began to occur and become more frequent through the spring. As part of the ongoing lake and fountain assessment, the Town's contracted engineering team, Black and Veatch, removed and inspected the current valves to identify and determine the cause of failure. Significant wear and damage was noted during the evaluation and the valves were found to be insufficient for the fountain system. They are not industrial grade nor designed for the high pressure demands of the fountain. As a result, the current valves have only lasted an average of five years. Black and Veatch researched the appropriate replacement valve robust enough for this application, including the need for increased PSI ratings and consideration given to the impacts of reclaimed, high salinity water. The replacement valves are estimated at $25,000 each, pending sales tax and freight. Due to staffing shortages and other COVID-19 related factors, an 18-week timeline is required for manufacturing and shipping. The warranty for the replacement valves is 24 months from the time of production. The cost for the valve replacement is fully budgeted in the Facilities Replacement Fund. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle N/A Risk Analysis Standard fountain operations are affected by the failures of the current check valves. The fountain is reduced to operating on a single pump until the valves are replaced. Since the lead time to replace the valves is approximately 18 weeks, it is imperative to move forward on replacing the valves to ensure there isn't a failure of the fountain in the near term. Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval. SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to authorize Town Manager to proceed with procurement and installation of three (3) Check Valves for the Fountain in an amount not to exceed $85,000. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Impact: $85,000 Budget Reference: FRAD Funding Source: If Multiple Funds utilized, list here: Budgeted: if No, attach Budget Adjustment Form: Inbox Community Services Director Finance Director Town Attorney Town Manager Form Started By: Jamie Salentine Final Approval Date: 10/06/2020 Form Review Reviewed By Rachael Goodwin David Pock Aaron D.Arnson Grady E. Miller Date 10/05/2020 05:47 PM 10/05/2020 08:32 PM 10/06/2020 11:05 AM 10/06/2020 11:31 AM Started On: 10/01/2020 09:58 AM