Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002.0815.TCREM.Packeto
a
that is Asv'"
NOTICE OF REGULAR AND EXECUTIVE
SESSION OF THE
FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL
Mayor Jon Beydler
Councilman Rick Melendez Councilman Mike Archambault
Vice Mayor Leesa Fraverd Councilman John Kavanagh
Councilwoman Kathy Nicola Councilwoman Susan Ralphe
WHEN: THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2002
TIME: 5:00 P.M. (the Council will meet in executive session from 5:00
to 6:30 p.m. at which time the regular session will begin)
WHERE: COMMUNITY CENTER
13001 NORTH LA MONTANA DRIVE
(*PLEASE NOTE ADDRESS CHANGE)
RULES FOR ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL — ADOPTED 1118190
It is the Council's desire to hear public comment on agenda items. As it is important to maintain order during the meeting, please adhere to
the following rules of order if you wish to speak:
1.) All citizens wishing to speak must first be recognized by the Mayor.
2.) The Mayor will not call for public comment on an item until after a motion has been made and seconded and the Council has
had adequate opportunity to discuss the item.
3.) Please stand, approach the microphone and state your name and address after being called on to speak.
4.) All comments must be directed to the Mayor.
5.) TIME LIMIT — THREE (3) MINUTES PER PERSON PER ITEM.
6.) Statements should not be repetitive.
7.) Persons or groups wishing to make longer presentations should see the Town Clerk prior to the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL — Mayor Beydler
1.) Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03.A.3, AND A.R.S. §38-431.03.A.4, VOTE TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
FOR: Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the attorney or attorneys of the public body, specifically
personal liability of council members; AND Discussion or consultation with the attorneys of the public body in order
to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the public body's position regarding contracts that are the
subject of negotiations, in pending or contemplated litigation or in settlement discussions conducted in order to avoid
or resolve litigation, specifically mediation, appeal and the need for a Settlement Attorney to review a proposed
settlement agreement as all relate to Hoffman/Robinson/Knapp vs. Town, et al.;
2.) RETURN TO REGULAR SESSION
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE TO THE FLAG — Mayor Beydler
• INVOCATION — Councilwoman Nicola
ROLL CALL
Town of Fountain Hills Page 1 of 3 Last printed 08/14/02 2:03 PM
Consent Agenda:
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine, non -controversial matters and will be enacted by one
motion and one roll call vote of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all
-,commended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a
.'ouncilmember or member of the public so requests. If a Councilmember or member of the public wishes to discuss an
item on the consent agenda,, they may request so prior to the motion to accept the consent agenda. The item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
*1.) Consideration of APPROVING THE MEETING MINUTES of July 29 and August 1, 6 and 9, 2002.
*2.) Consideration of the PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT for "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1,
Tokpela Final Plat. Case number S2002-19.
*3.) Consideration of a PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT for "The La Montana Condominiums", a 15-unit
multiple family project located at 16734 La Montana Drive, aka Plat 102, Block 3, Lot 9A, Case Number S2002-
23.
*4.) Consideration of ORDINANCE 02-11, levying upon the assessed valuation of the property within the
Cottonwoods Maintenance District subject to taxation, a certain sum upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of
valuation sufficient to raise the amount estimated to be required in the annual budget, to provide funds for
maintenance of certain pedestrian areas, parking and parkways, all for the fiscal year ending the 30`s day of June,
2003.
*5.) Consideration of RESOLUTION 2002-32 abandoning whatever right, title, or interest the Town has in a portion
of the existing 8' electric easement, the 20' effluent line easement, and a 25' wide public utility and drainage
easement within the Four Peaks Plaza Plat boundary as recorded in Book 568 of Maps, Page 39 Records of
Maricopa County, Arizona EA2002-16.
*6.) Consideration of RESOLUTION 2002-33 abandoning whatever right, title, or interest the Town has in certain
public utility and drainage easements located at the southerly and easterly property lines of Lot 23, Block 4, Plat
431 (15219 N. Wiley Drive) as recorded in Book 151 of Maps, Page 43 Records of Maricopa County, Arizona -
EA2002-14. Michael and Marilyn Grudier
*7.) Consideration of RESOLUTION 2002-34 abandoning whatever right, title, or interest the Town has in certain
public utility and drainage easements located at the northeast and northwest property lines of Lot 36, Block 1, Plat
505D (16673 N. Boxcar Drive) as recorded in Book 158 of Maps, Page 41 Records of Maricopa County, Arizona
- EA2002-15. Ted and Debra Donatoni
*8.) Consideration of ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS MCDOWELL
MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION to accept the proposal for the Trailhead Design and
Landscape Plan submitted by Premier Engineering and complete a contract for an amount not to exceed
$15,000.00 for fiscal year 2002-03.
9.) UPDATE by Councilman Rick Melendez on the North East Advocacy Center located in Scottsdale.
10.) Discussion with possible action regarding MEDIATION.
11.) Discussion and possible action on a MOTION TO HIRE A SETTLEMENT ATTORNEY for purposes of
reviewing a proposed Settlement Agreement involving Hoffman/Robinson/Knapp V. Town of FH.
12.) Discussion and possible action on a MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE APPEAL of a portion of the ruling in the
case known as Knapp V. Town of Fountain Hills.
13.) Discussion and possible action on a COUNCIL CONSTITUENT SERVICES budget line item.
0 714.) UPDATE regarding the printing of the Compass publication, with possible direction to staff on implementing cost
reduction measures. (This item was continued from the 8/l/02 council meeting.)
Town of Fountain Hills Page 2 of 3 Last printed 08/14/02 2:03 PM
15.) Consideration of the PRELIMINARY PLAT for the 9-lot, 11.104± acre, Sierra Madre Estates, Phase I, located
along the northwest side of Sierra Madre Drive, southwest of Golden Eagle Boulevard, Case Number S2001-16.
016.) PUBLIC HEARING on a request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow Fry's Food and Drug, located at
14845 E. Shea Boulevard, to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow a change of store
operating hours to S:QQ a.m. until 11:00 p.m. Case number SU2002-05.
17.) Consideration of a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow Fry's Food and Drug, located at 14845 E. Shea Boulevard,
to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow a change of store operating hours to 5:00 a.m.
until 11:00 p.m. Case number SU2002-05.
18.) PUBLIC HEARING to receive public comments on a request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow a wireless
communications facility, consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug mounted
antennas, at Fountain Hills High School, located at 16100 E. Palisades Boulevard, Case Number SU2002-01.
19.) Consideration of a recommendation to Town Council on a request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow a
wireless communications facility, consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug
mounted antennas, at Fountain Hills High School, located at 16100 E. Palisades Boulevard, Case Number SU2002-
01.
20.) Consideration of ORDINANCE 02-12, levying upon the assessed valuation of the property within the Town of
Fountain Hills, subject to taxation a certain sum upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of valuation sufficient to
raise the amount estimated to be required in the annual budget, to provide funds for bond redemptions, for the
purpose of paying interest upon bonded indebtedness; all for the fiscal year ending the 30th day of June, 2003.
21.) Consideration to approve a CUT/FILL WAIVER for Eagle Mountain Parcel 13, Lot 33, aka 15117 Camelview
Drive, Case Number CFW2002-2.
22.) CALL TO THE PUBLIC AND ADJOURNMENT.
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431 -01 (G), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters not listed on the agenda but must be within the jurisdiction of the
Council. All comment is "subject to reasonable time, space and manner restrictions" and the Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters
raised during call to the public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and Legal action. At the conclusion of the call to the public,
individual Council members may respond to criticism, ask staff to review a matter of ask that a matter be out on a future aaenda.
DATED this 14th day of August, 2002
Cassie B. Hansen, Director of Administration/Town
The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with
disabilities. Please call 837-2003 (voice) or 1-800-367-8939 (TDD) 48 hours prior to the
meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in this meeting or to obtain
agenda information in large print format.
Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the council with this agenda are available for review in the Clerk's office.
Town of Fountain Hills Page 3 of 3 Last printed 08/14/02 2:03 PM
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Town of Fountain Hills City Council
FROM: Denise Ruhling, Planner ��-
THROUGH: Jesse Drake, Interim Community Development Director
DATE: August 15, 2002
SUBJECT: Consideration for approval of a Preliminary/Final Plat for "La Strada
Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat
This request by La Strada Villas L.L.P. is for approval of Preliminary/Final plat for "La Strada
Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. Please see attached Staff Report for
further information.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
AWN
STAFF REPORT
August 9, 2002
CASE NO: S2002-19
LOCATION: Preliminary/Final Plat "Tokpela" Lot 1 aka 13600 North Fountain Hills Boulevard
REQUEST: Consider approval of a Preliminary/Final plat for "La Strada Condominiums" a
subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat.
CASE MANAGER: Denise Ruhling, Planner
DESCRIPTION:
OWNER: La Strada Villas L.L.P.
APPLICANT: La Strada Villas L.L.P.
EXISTING ZONING: "R-4" Multi -Family Residential
EXISTING CONDITION: Vacant land
LOT SIZE: 408,550.93 sq ft or 9.38 acres
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
NORTH: Four Peaks Vista Condos; zoned "R-4"
SOUTH: Lutheran Church; zoned "R-4"
EAST: La Vida Buena Condos; zoned "R-4"
WEST: Villa De Este Condos/Arrow Wash; zoned "R-4"
SUMMARY:
This request by La Strada Villas L.L.P. is for approval of Preliminary/Final plat for "La Strada
Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. This plan conforms to the concept plan
approved in February of 2002 with the exception of trash pick up.
The applicant is requesting approval of a sixty (60)-unit condominium project in a R-4 zoning
district. The irregularly shaped lot accommodates the sixty units in eleven buildings arranged along
a private gated drive. Non -disturbance areas have been identified and placed on the steeper
portions of the site.
Resident access will enter and exit the development from Fountain Hills Boulevard on the east.
The west -side gate will be used for emergency and sanitation access. Minimum unit size is 1,457
sq. ft. maximum unit size is 2,012 sq ft. Parking provided is 137 spaces, or 2.28 spaces per unit and
meets all ADA code requirements. TOFH requirements for parking are 135 spaces, or 2.25 spaces
per unit. Total lot coverage equals 79,443 sf or 19.4%, well within the allowable maximum
coverage of 50%.
EVALUATION:
The application conforms to the TOFH zoning ordinance requirements for multi -family housing;
including, setbacks, lot coverage, open space, and parking.
The application conforms to the approved concept plan with the exception of trash pick up. The
approved concept plan showed community dumpsters, this plan allows for individual resident
containers and pick up by sanitation trucks entering and exiting on Mountainside Drive, as well as
Fountain Hills Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed Preliminary/Final Plat is in compliance with the regulations of The Town of Fountain
Hills Zoning Ordinance. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their
August 8, 2002, meeting and recommends approval and staff recommends approval of the
Preliminary/Final Plat S2000-19 "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela
Final Plat.
N
k
PBA 1/02
L
0-4
The Town of Fountain Hills
For Official Use Only
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Case Manager:
Fountain Hills, Arizona
APPLICATU
Area Specific Plan or Change Preliminary Plate /,,dy�
General Plan Amendment Cut/Fill Waiver
Plan of Development Special Use Permit
Zoning Change SU Comprehensive Sign Plan
Variance HPE Change or Abandonment
NATURE OF THE REQUEST:
16
PROJECT NAME
Mrs. Applicant: Day Phone
Mr.
Ms. Address: City: State: Zip:
Mrs. Owner: 44 Day Phone -Mo"
M r.
Ms. Address: )nI07 0• � � �� fQ� City: State: Zip: g Y
If app/ication is be� ing �6rnitted b}� soleone other than the owner of the property under consideration, the section be/ow
must be completed,
SIGNATURE OF OWNER` — DATE 4-!1,
I HEREBY AUTHORIZE �/ �� TO FILE THIS APPLICATION.
Please Print
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of _ , 20 0�
My Commission Exp�i
N Public -111
MyC"n.Ex*AMY r-Auerf1.2iK5r
K It ( U 6o
0 00
FILING DATE: FEE PAID: ' L ACCEPTED BY:
(See Fee Schedule)
Application C, o 0
Page 2 of 7 ClVQi rG( �� / !� -�k,Cas@ Number
Zoo 2- /y
PBA 1 /02
The Town of Fountain Hills
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Flo
-e/
Plat Name Block Lot
PROPERTY ADDRESS l311m) 4/� #Ak5 41�1
PARCEL SIZE (Acres) �- 3e ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER
NUMBER OF UNITS PROPOSED TRACTS — -
EXISTING ZONING: !� ¢ PROPOSED ZONING
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MAY 0 8 2002
COMMUN/Ty DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
Application
Page 3 of 7
Case'Nurh �,
9ae9-crc (ow> .q1 n91-�cra (091) '• a31
99ZS9 VNOZIaV SIIIH NIV1Nnp!il.'�
10Z 311nS '3Av M31AHavd 3 91L 91
4 'AxmmVNrw * orauamoNa ; ,o-
IVld IVNIJ a8YAMOS S111H NIV1Nn0!E'N009'Cjbl3dN01M U.
0
wnINIWOONOJ VOVHIS Vl
ff a
a
Lb
r
_48
yak
e•
$
ii
dg ppY �pD
q
fr
Rip
(j $ ^pb
I
U �yi Ly �1 Fd�{iP�
'� b-fit tl]5igr
1.
P�A
{9i �•
1.z
Y'e9 �
�
q3 sib3q2
a^` 3���b�siC
�i
E
p
D
d iy 4i
6•p
Zr
I L
:id }
a
a+i��
ese
" E SAS ii A
•Y b�
C
V m
U W
0 Y�
N � 'i-
,o
I
0 J<�
Qi4,
�[
0�
0
O
<
p ?'3 ai9 — Ail
Ln
x; sf
Q -
OJ • _ • .. . •, :.• Q a .. • .. a .. ..- O
o m 0000 m 0000
O
U
t�
o Q 9$ a: 9c_ 19 u, _! 91 1c
is �, $>f iA 89 Is
•..... ... _.. ... .,1 •.. 0
C,
J
m m a e m 0 m
V �� If� �� �� N �71 1.i ■i i� M
o m
J �
m 0(a 0 a m e(a a 8 m
31
J
<
M
.Nt
O?z
b_
~O
-
IL
�
9F^�71Q
• 3a� ---
�
'Z3
gum o
E
Juan
�V
u o i C o c
Y�•
Yp •ie6
aaaaaa�a is
_a _���
•gooiYYY
0 5f.nb$6:�
z F&
n ng f<-£��.Y ✓3
` fi E i � E,' E y 4 Y
_Yp
' •- $ 2:S E L "�
9_ E_ S E A g d 8 a E E E A 5
i• = 3 a
oo�a=eM
N �f3; K= aE�b: $ a :�9a�bEbeg :7 �:„• i o bi '^= Ye~Z3
$s�
gg 8.=t8 ix Hs°�
�_ c r 3( 1m Y
C E ta4.' �� � o g 3 5 g3gb gg � � ° r g @ § :bad EN' a? �py��' � ;� ��
4 mab�r `YES - re b r p
_ z E ry y J § b���Y 8
-� Y 4�Vb?i7b=9_'_ s=Z8m7 93 Lt`2Se 2` a e3'� a y$: d5
:Mb a *e '- �' z
a� a a o3c:cc3cab 3J8Sa.-a . age �e€::
VJ �
J Z
J W
EE _N
Z O 9
H N
00 O
a O
o Q =r
C
H O
U
)au jsansnojX�iobjuoujp :I!ow-o
9999-cw (o9.) oI s.91-cro (090 -
toz 31InS '3AV M3y\NNVd '3 9 IL= xi
'r1'Tyl'1►1iM130YNYN * ONtli31�UO/�Ni�
1n0Avl 11Nn - ivld 1v N1!
Hay
08Vn3inos SIIIH NIV1Nf10! 'N 009i1
Ol
t 101 V13dN01 ' a
10
wnlNIWOONOO VOrli1S Vl ff a
Lai
/.Js]e Lr0 M _.._.._VNU
L eggs-ag (090 x0s uOVL :1iow-a 51N3n35V3 - lVld IYNU OHV�31�108 SIIIH NIYl Nf10� 'N 009C1
aaaa-cra (oat) •ol swl-csa (oa.)
992s9 VNOZIdV 'SIIIH NIY1Nf10� 0310N SV = LA
toz 301S 3AV M31nHaYd 3 91[91 � 3 `4 ` Har�,� Nao" l 101 b'13dZI U.
O
JT'llii•IiOYNrw r OMUR IONi ,o-lo-so H2lV F
)�3 V V �9jN1IW Wf1INIW04N0� VaY!!1S Vl S a
n , o.war+o.n .rrovrn• .e ee.i I�or..w
\ � e '•' .., $'&4 �/ rye. � Q o �Vile
41
•i" -
r
. �0pll 9=s rl�4r Y�
•f
\ \�� ..� - '�zl'y � .``' .•l•ryq,� x asp *.{gy ''Ry ql
pBeJELL
ep
a. ar K $ .fll(l y'y� I/•, ` , J J • .toj= x
\`, �= C: (3Rx ,•r�'fli• 4 . 6i 4,lPh•' 1
r / Vk,
a
O
Z\`'\ fit' •q i� � r�I R!
U -
j'Z
• eye/ �Si ��q a�_ i } i
` 8 Y, y �� •J i �lpt6t rs5
` � Jf �1•• 7 \ �, Y
A s kz=se 'x ^a s w .A
Uk }.
�r � V ..lj�
x s Si a - ¢- `\_ 3 Itse1. 00 � R s r ie k b �yt�- nre.y
j 0C�C�tr�0C7GC1� J v0C7C 15,
cr,
wuwusn n•a o. Is u lca..s 00
notx,awo6luowD :pow -a $NVId aI1 - IVId IVMJ
Oavn31nOB SIIIH NIV1N()0! 'N 009f1
9999-ct9 (oBi•) COI sf91-tfC (OHs) OXON SV O!
99Z99 VNOZIUY 'SIIIH NIV1NnOd
107Z '13lNI�nS7i'3OAVV NMV3171n A*bvOdNI'tl3 39lZ91
t 101 Vl3dN01 LL
ION3 O
w-IO-90 HaYA�GW09iN0NW
wn)NiwoaNOO VOVais VI g
`r1
I�
c
•OO LL
-
A
+---oorz----
J"-8
u-----;
E
777
LAC
+ u
SCTL
us3
Oil
�
y
.a7KCZ
naVrao�
�
�� $
>s
oc s
-t om I
n c •.
oo a
°p
cv-
--
- -- --
-
---
mo+oo�
0o tt
ccTL
m
Y
.y
rr Tt
CC6
i_
�i Q
Z
Q
_ J
Of
O
Y O
Q J
J U—
�J�l
Z >
j W
n w
Li
�o
Z
Q
J
Q'
O
O
Q J
J W
C J
j
p W
— I-J
m m W ui
s
(n'
z
Q
J
d
Z
Q
lain Isa.sriDL.(jawo6ju9wp -pow-a
9999-tC9 (099) °w Mi-au (099)
99ZS9 VNOZI8V 'SIIIH NIV1NnOd
90Z 311nS '3AV M31AHdvd '3 91191 A�GWMLNIIWLv
�-n °L+awaovNvw * o�aua�woNa
SNrld bOOU - 1y1d IVNIJ 0dvn31nO8 SIIIH NIV1N(103 N 009C1
ION sr' mdo ( 101 H13dN01 a
O
IW
-to-90 Hav �• mINUUN00 VUVHIS V'i a
o
F- Of
O
O
0 �
J I
9[ Z
~=
--------------- — o 0
_ Q J
J Iy
' CO J
Z_
41
En ck:
I(— ------------ W CO
------------
10
C?=
I
I
tk
1
m
�I^I-_�I^
°D
^Ih •.mil ^In�r9i^
I
�''
1
��^'
vN
=
H
NN�!liINn�
�
06O
�hv'I �Nrt•li INn^lIl
1
C0OD�I�i�HV�0O�iII�IjI�.
11
i-LL
H
-Y-O
1
!H
=�zUj2_
�y
I
.9a'9
LMITL
o
aCr
M1�
1
oczz
ar[
Y n
8g
or9z
GJ
osz
aaII - ----,sc¢-----
.asrz .osz
V 9s
Y 0
,
g
-----------
19 SZ
��
�
_-
.a9
t9
8
.oczpYt
�7
2
o ©
A.
ti
L'° °" J:u'Jsa.arel6 iawo6J uow0 :1!OW-a Sw Id a001! - lrld IVM1 OaVATWS SIIIH NIVINnO.1 N 009CI
9999-[f9 (O9s) a' S•Bl-Lf9 (O9f) 031ON SV
B9ZS9 '30%vIV 'SIIIH -3 NfJ0! ( lO1 d�3dNOI U.
♦OZ 3tIf15 '3nv /A31nHavd '3 91[9t �• � -+� ' nao �
�T'1Ni/�OYN11N OlYtli3NgNi i I0-Io-90� Hav
Ax-q vng I wnw wniNiwoallo� vadals vi ff
i�------ ------
C3
4D
'1
�`oJo�R
o
" nv
Z
�z
as
ou•.
Q
_
I
a
•
tY
�J
°•
Od •
b
z
Q
F-
�O
00
Q J
J L.�
CD I
_Z ck�
O O
J C
m L-
Of ass
u Z
} O
J <vv
J U-
Z i1f0 ^ I
Q w :f[ OOIf
nc
m w <
LJ
lau lsa.s,*LA,awo6luo- :Ilow-a SN0NO3S - 1VId IV021tlN31nOG SIIIH NIVINnO! 'N 009CL —�
9999-Ls9 (00') •,I st91-L" (09t) " O31pN $V'
/kN
99ZS9 VNOZIMV 'SIIIH NIVJNf10.! ( 101 dl3dN01 LL YOZ 31,nS 3AV M3AX8Vd '3 91L91 y' 41 >t ^' NMo'
�-n -'1�N3i(Aiorlirnw *' uwaaangtta 3 to-10-90 Hatl - Wl11NIWOUN00 corals rl g a
FM
Sy
M.�R
3
O
r
s
z
C,
d
_J
m
q
G
CD
J
O
Q
J
L I I
1aulsa.s�1.�•a wo61uow0 :I!ow-a
9999-Lr9 (091) •a s�91-cr9 (07 031c
9
9Z99 tlNOZIbY 'SIIIH WIN nO! '
10Z 31 nS '3Atl M3Ul4atld '3 91L91
�T *MQV420YNIIM V ONIUMMIDNi� t. ; 10_
AQJY q
❑ LLIwD V /�b
I .arm�w. •a awe O l�Gr�
SNOU33S - lvld WNI! 06rAMOB SIIIH NIVINf10! 'N 009f1
sr a
I V. ( 101 V13dN01 a
O
-90' NaY vinlNIWOONOO vnvm i S Vl
$ m
f—
O
¢
J
110 °x _ tau Isarcroldjawo6luowp :Pow -a
ev9Q-av (Do,) .a, s.al-cto (09+)
99ZS9 VNOZIN SIIIH NO"..3 '
♦OZ' 311nS '3AV M3UNMtlVd 3 9Q9I 3 tj
� n '1NHN130VNY11 T OwIp1umno i
V V ❑ JJ.J V
A63 ❑ W
NO1103S - IVId IVNId O8VA3lnOS SIIIH NIVINnOj "N 009CI
.r— ( 101 V13d)401 a
ryas �.a. _ O
-90 Huy wnipawonNon vnvm S V-1 g a
f-
0
Q
J
L
��TAIN
a — a
�• ,,: 191
�,bat is AT+""
DATE:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TOWN of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
August 7, 2002
The Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager
Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner 1`�
Case # S2002-023; Preliminary and Final Plat for "The La Montana
Condominiums"; located at 16726 E. La Montana Dr.; aka. Lot 9a, Block 3,
Plat 102.
This is a request by David Vidalin, to condominiumize a 15-unit multiple family project with a
common pool amenity. Staff recommends approval of this preliminary and final plat. Please see the
attached staff report for detail regarding this request. If you have any questions, I can be reached at
(480) 816-5138.
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
sow PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION & STAFF REPORT
August 15, 2002
CASE NO: S2002-023
LOCATION: 16726 E. La Montana Dr.; aka. Lot 9a, Block 3, Plat 102
REQUEST: Consider the Preliminary and Final Plat for "The La Montana Crossing
Condominiums", a 15-unit condominium project.
PROJECT MANAGER:
DESCRIPTION:
Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner
OWNER:
David Vidalin
APPLICANT:
David Vidalin
EXISTING ZONING:
"R-3"
EXISTING CONDITION:
Undeveloped lot
LOT SIZE:
46,401 square feet
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
NORTH: Cambria court Condominiums and undeveloped lot; zoned "R-3"
SOUTH: Shopping Plaza; zoned "C-2"
EAST: Northstar Condominiums; zoned "R-3
WEST: The Crossings Commercial Shopping Plaza; zoned "C-2 P.U.D."
SUMMARY:
This request is for approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for "La Montana Crossing
Condominiums" Declaration of Condominium, which subdivides cubic airspace, and is not a land
sell project. Due to the simplicity of this request and the fact that this project has limited off -site
public improvements, a "fast track" process is being allowed.
The owner, David Vidalin, has chosen to convert a 15-unit multiple family residential complex and
record a Declaration of Condominium to sell the units individually. The units will have a
maximum livable area of 1,372 square feet, a minimum livable area of 1,096 square feet and a
covered patio. Each unit will have two designated parking spaces on -site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of S2002-023; Preliminary and Final Plat "The La Montana
Crossing Condominiums".
R,
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VDOMINIUMPL�4TAPPtCrAT1QN:�r,,
Date Filed Fee Paid ,40
or a
Condominium Name
N,
Condominium Address
f 4
Legal Description of Lot/Parcel Being Platted
Plat 14902
Parcel Size
o •oGs ,
Number of fracts
A JF
nve-
General Plan Land Use Desi nation
*, e
Density Requested (Dwellingfunits Per Acre)
Applicant
1Add
I Ires /0 wG j y MOW C/1
, 5- i .
Owner
Lle
Address
Attachments (Please list) _
i- r. /� -f- Accepted By C
Block 3 Lot(s)
Number of Units
'frs
Zoning
�-3
City
City
�M Icok)40*1 0- X"& A44.1
Signature of Owner I HERBY AUTHORIZE (Please Print)
TO FILE THIS APPLICATION.
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of
Notary Public TOWN OF FOUNTAI ORT'ssion Expires
J U N 2 4 2002
COMMUNITY
Day Phone
Vo '.5/0
64111 1 Zip
.cam
Day Phone
ST Zip
Date
��•�/- Off.
,19
DEPARTMEN TFH Case Number
Fee Schedule Attached ^+
i r
1 4
E
3
.pyyy
n
951 a
t E
low
0,101
5 e
5� ,ie+e9Xiji !j
5 51�1�H�1 Ua�i°}!,Ili !1s1�s�1
i
J
= N
zcm
H N Z
Z u'
�o N cc
Q
za
Vr
00
U Q
W
8J
n
�
r r.—
I ccccceecr eeccccccr e c
tuttttu tttuttu t t
4R444g4� 44!l44�E1 � i
1 MUM! offiffif!
:Illul � Illnll �
§ j 5555555 + 5555555 � �
d d
!I
ME
i
Im
.10
1
+� z ao
o
�
0
cn
a
z o�\
r D
so
� o
:\ z -
i
cr O —
�5 a o n$ n n
g3� ri of � of o 0
00 o
f� o �7
o y N D
t
z
N
N
t Z F
r) z O D Z
i O 0 7
cli
t _p5
Z 1✓
O i—
EL
f' HH ,Z '.J.A N
zz r t r
00 , PI) Pon» z
N
t r
7 j \ �\
t �
N O
N �.
tt � Z Z
z z
i\ NN 77
N
r t y .00 6 ,00.6
_ R
� � b
R
6 III
.01 � s
� I ! I Itl � �
�9y � ei g n o r°Pi °ri
M of of 00
ORDINANCE NO.02-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, ASSESSING UPON THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS AND PARCELS
WITHIN THE COTTONWOODS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH
PARCEL IN THE DISTRICT SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE
REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR MAINTENANCE OF
CERTAIN PEDESTRIAN AREAS, PARKING AND PARKWAYS, ALL FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2003.
WHEREAS, the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Sections 48-574 and 48-575
allow for the assessment of maintenance charges upon the lots and parcels within an improvement district
and such assessments to be collected in the manner and by the officers provided by law for the collection
and enforcement of general taxes; and
WHEREAS, Maricopa County is the assessing and collecting authority for the Town of
Fountain Hills, the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the County
Assessor and the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. There is hereby levied on each lot and tax parcel listed in the attached
Exhibit A within the corporate limits of the Town of Fountain Hills Cottonwoods Maintenance District the
amount listed on such Exhibit A for the purpose of providing maintenance for certain pedestrian areas,
parking and parkways for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003.
SECTION 2. Failure by the county officials of Maricopa County, Arizona, to properly
return the delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in the same, or any irregularity in
any proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or invalidate any title conveyed by any tax or
foreclosure deed; failure or neglect of any officer or officers to timely perform any of the duties assigned
to him or to them, shall not invalidate any proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto, the validity of
the assessment or of the judgement of sale by which the collection of the same may be enforced, shall not
affect the lien of the Town of Fountain Hills upon such property for the delinquent assessment unpaid
thereon, and no overcharge as to part of the assessment or of costs shall invalidate any proceedings for the
collection of assessments or the foreclosure; and all acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed
by officers de jure.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTW) by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of
Fountain Hills, Arizona, this day of N IA!� u O— , 2002.
ATTEST:
Cassie B. Hansen, Director of Administration/Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY/APPROVED AS 19
FORM:
William E. Farrell, Acting iSTV0hr Attorney
EXHIBIT A
Lot No.
Tax Parcel No.
Amount to
be Levied*
1
176-03-923
$57.15
2
176-03-924
$57.15
3
176-03-925
$57.15
4
176-03-926
$57.15
5
176-03-927
$57.15
6
176-03-928
$57.15
7
176-03-929
$57.15
8
176-03-930
$57.15
9
176-03-931
$57.15
10
176-03-932
$57.15
11
176-03-933
$57.15
12
176-03-934
$57.15
13
176-03-935
$57.15
14
176-03-936
$57.15
15
176-03-937
$57.15
16
176-03-938
$57.15
17
176-03-939
$57.15
18
176-03-940
$57.15
19
176-03-941
$57.15
20
176-03-942
$57.15
21
176-03-943
$57.15
22
176-03-944
$57.15
23
176-03-945
$57.15
24
176-03-946
$57.15
25
176-03-947
$57.15
26
176-03-948
$57.15
27
176-03-949
$57.15
28
176-03-950
$57.15
29
176-03-952
$57.15
30
176-03-953
$57.15
31
176-03-953
$57.15
32
176-03-954
$57.15
33
176-03-955
$57.15
34
176-03-956
$57.15
35
176-03-957
$57.15
36
176-03-958
$57.15
37
176-03-959
$57.15
38
176-03-960
$57.15
39
176-03-961
$57.15
40
176-03-962
$57.15
41
176-03-963
$57.15
Lot No.
Tax Parcel No.
Amount to
be Levied*
42
176-03-964
$57.15
43
176-03-965
$57.15
44
176-03-966
$57.15
45
176-03-967
$57.15
46
176-03-968
$57.15
47
176-03-969
$57.15
48
176-03-970
$57.15
49
176-03-971
$57.15
50
176-03-972
$57.15
51
176-03-973
$57.15
52
176-03-974
$57.15
53
176-03-975
$57.15
54
176-03-976
$57.15
55
176-03-977
$57.15
56
176-03-978
$57.15
57
176-03-979
$57.15
58
176-03-980
$57.15
*such sum may be paid in two installments, along with such parcel's other taxes
/jb
Chron 164
O�IyTAI1V
p
a
�• tsrto
that is A
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Jim Leubner, Senior Civil Engineen�L
REVIEWED: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer
THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public WO
DATE: August 8, 2002
RE: Easement Abandonment 2002-16; Resolution 2002-32
Four Peaks Plaza includes:
• Eight (8') Foot Electric Easement
• Twenty (20') Foot Effluent Line Easement
• Twenty -Five (25') Foot Public Utility and Drainage Easement
MCO Properties
Tkis item on the Town Council's agenda is a proposal to abandon a portion of the existing 8 foot Electric
Easement, and also the 20 foot Effluent Line Easement and the 25 foot wide Public Utility and Drainage
Easement within the Four Peaks Plaza Plat. It is important to note that these easement abandonments
were required as stipulations of approval for both the Four Peaks Plaza Preliminary Plat (October 2000)
and the Final Plat (June 2001). These easement abandonments are necessary for the completion and
approval of the Four Peaks Plaza project. Exhibit "A" shows those easements to be abandoned and/or
retained.
The Public Works Department/Engineering Division has reviewed the site to ascertain any drainage
issues in addition to the Town's general interest in the easements. It is the professional opinion of the
Engineering Division that there is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easements proposed to be
abandoned. The recently constructed Laser Channel and associated drainage easement have replaced the
prior drainage easement and has been approved by Town staff and also FEMA (Flood Emergency
Management Association).
All affected utility companies have been notified of these abandonment proposals and have approved all
of the various easement abandonments.
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2002-32.
att: Exhibit "A"
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
k.
When recorded, return to:
Public Works Department/ Engineering Division
Town of Fountain Hills
P.O. Box 17958
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
RESOLUTION 2002-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA ABANDONING WHATEVER
RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN, A PORTION OF THE CERTAIN
EIGHT (8') FOOT ELECTRIC EASEMENT, THE TWENTY (20') FOOT
EFFLUENT LINE EASEMENT AND THE TWENTY-FIVE (25') FOOT
PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN THE
BOUNDARY OF THE FOUR PEAKS PLAZA "FINAL PLAT", FOUNTAIN
HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 568 OF MAPS, PAGE 39,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, as the governing body of real property
located in the Town of Fountain Hills, may require the dedication of public streets, sewer,
water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights -of -way within any proposed
subdivision; and
WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills has the authority to accept or reject offers
of dedication of private property by easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful
means; and
WHEREAS, All present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills,
Arizona as follows:
SECTION 1. That a portion of the certain eight (8') foot electric easement, the twenty (20') effluent line
easement and the twenty-five (25') foot public utility and drainage easement; as shown in
Exhibit "A"; as recorded in book 568 of maps, page 39 records of Maricopa County,
Arizona; are hereby declared to be abandoned by the Town of Fountain Hills. Certain lots
within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -lot drainage runoff. The property owners of the
Four Peaks Plaza Project are required to pass the developed flows generated by the
upstream lots and streets across their property.
SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the
purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in
no way attempts to affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or
assert any right resulting therefrom or existing previous to any action by the Town.
Resolution 2002-32
Page 1 of 2
PASS FAIL,,��--���5"d,-
MOTION �+►'C.am &A -I ♦-
SECOND - te-0 n}+4,
COUNT 7—O
r
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August 2002.
ATTEST:
\LJ
Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY:
Interim Town M ager
L:
L
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HII.LS
William E. Farrell, Town Attorney
Resolution 2002-32
Page 2 of 2
CI
SAGLE 20
1
t
i 1
i
r
!)1
r s
i
i
r
/Ac pal
r
��•- MI
/gyp LANp S � Ie�o►�
\M A tF,yo��i i IIIIMt
� aEi�c
33321 J' DOE
P.41CHf, EL J. 0 ,p0 NO1
n PUM 1ER I
Chron
R
Il
o��'TAINl
ao �� Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
a Public Works Department
� MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council ,
FROM: Art Candelaria, Civil Engineer �
REVIEWED: Randy Harrel, Town Enginee�, 1. �9
r\l
THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public W�ks
DATE: August 9, 2002
RE: Easement Abandonment 2002-14; Resolution 2002-33
15219 N. Wiley Drive
Plat 431, Block 4, Lot 23
Michael and Marilyn Grudier
This item on the Town Council's agenda is a proposal to abandon the ten (10) foot public utility
and drainage easements located at the southerly and easterly property lines of Lot 23, Block 4,
Plat 431, (15219 N. Wiley Drive) as shown in Exhibit "A". The property owners of Lot 23 desire the
assurance that any future improvements made to the lot will not be infringed upon by the
construction of utilities. Staff has received no comments to date from the adjacent property
owners. The westerly 20' of the southerly 10' public utility easement will be retained for existing
and potential future utility boxes.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the site to ascertain any drainage issues in addition
to the Town's general interest in the easement. It is the professional opinion of the Engineering
Department that there is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easement proposed to be
abandoned, with the understanding that certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -
lot drainage runoff. The property owners of Lot 23 are required to pass the developed flows
generated by the upstream lots across their property.
All affected utility companies have been notified of this abandonment proposal and have
approved of the proposed abandonment of this public utility easement.
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2002-33.
lib
att.
Cc: Michael & Marilyn Grudier B. Seimon
P. Gonvers M/M Broznak
EA2002-14; Res. 33 Plat 431, Blk 4, Lot 23 (15219 N. Wiley Dr.) Grudier
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain F ills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
When recorded, return to:
Engineering Department
Town of Fountain Hills
P.O. Box 17958
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
RESOLUTION 2002-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA ABANDONING WHATEVER
RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN A PORTION OF THE CERTAIN
TEN (10') FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ALONG
THE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOT 23, BLOCK 4, OF
PLAT 431, FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 151 OF
MAPS, PAGE 43, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, as the governing body of real property
located in the Town of Fountain Hills, may require the dedication of public streets, sewer,
water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights -of -way within any proposed
subdivision; and
WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills has the authority to accept or reject offers
of dedication of private property by easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful
means; and
4 WHEREAS, All present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills,
Arizona as follows:
SECTION 1. That a portion of the certain ten (10) foot public utility and drainage easements, located
along the southerly and easterly property lot lines of Plat 431, Block 4, Lot 23, Fountain
Hills, Arizona; as shown in Exhibit "A"; as recorded in book 151 of maps, page 43 records
of Maricopa County, Arizona; are hereby declared to be abandoned by the Town of
Fountain Hills. Certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -lot drainage runoff.
The property owners of Lot 23 are required to pass the developed flows generated by the
upstream lots across their property.
SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the
purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in
no way attempts to affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or
assert any right resulting there from or existing previous to any action by the Town.
Resolution 2002-33
Page 1 of 2
7
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15'' day of August, 2002.
ATTEST:
Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk
REU�EWED BY:
4TIntenim—TownManager
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
William E. Farrell, Town Attorney
Resolution 2002-33
Page 2 of 2
Chron 139
o �
that is Ate'"
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Public Works Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Art Candelaria, Civil Engineer
} L
REVIEWED: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer�(� i
THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public W
DATE: July 30, 2002
RE: Easement Abandonment 2002-15: Resolution 2002-34
16673 N. Boxcar Drive
Plat 505D, Block 1, Lot 36
Ted & Debra Donatoni
This item on the Town Council's agenda is a proposal to abandon the ten (10) foot public utility
and drainage easements located a the northeast and northwest property lines of Lot 36, Block
1, Plat 505D, (16673 N. Boxcar Drive) as shown in Exhibit "A". The property owners of Lot 36 desire
the assurance that any future improvements made to the lot will not be infringed upon by the
construction of utilities. Staff has received no comments to date from the adjacent property
owners. The southwest 20' of the northwest 10' public utility easement will be retained for existing
and potential future utility boxes.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the site to ascertain any drainage issues in addition
to the Town's general interest in the easement. It is the professional opinion of the Engineering
Department that there is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easement proposed to be
abandoned, with the understanding that certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -
lot drainage runoff. The property owners of Lot 36 are required to pass the developed flows
generated by the upstream lots across their property,
All affected utility companies have been notified of this abandonment proposal and have
approved of the proposed abandonment of this public utility easement.
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2002-34.
/jb
att.
Cc: Ted & Debra Donatoni
4W Mr. Miceli & Ms. Sambora
M/M Howell
N/M Melucci
EA2002-15; Res. 34 Plat 505D, Blk 1, Lot 36 (16673 N. Boxcar Dr.) Donatoni
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
11
When recorded, return to:
Engineering Department
Town of Fountain Hills
P.O. Box 17958
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
RESOLUTION 2002-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA ABANDONING WHATEVER
RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN A PORTION OF THE CERTAIN
TEN (10') FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ALONG
THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST LOT LINES OF LOT 36, BLOCK 1,
OF PLAT 505D, FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK
158 OF MAPS, PAGE 41, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, as the governing body of real property
located in the Town of Fountain Hills, may require the dedication of public streets, sewer,
water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights -of -way within any proposed
subdivision; and
WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills has the authority to accept or reject offers
of dedication of private property by easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful
means; and
WHEREAS, All present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment;
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills,
Arizona as follows:
SECTION 1. That a portion of the certain ten (10) foot public utility and drainage easements, located
along the northeast and northwest property lot lines of Plat 505D, Block 1, Lot 36, Fountain
Hills, Arizona; as shown in Exhibit "A"; as recorded in book 158 of maps, page 41 records
of Maricopa County, Arizona; are hereby declared to be abandoned by the Town of
Fountain Hills. Certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -lot drainage runoff.
The property owners of Lot 36 are required to pass the developed flows generated by the
upstream lots across their property.
SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the
purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in
no way attempts to affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or
assert any right resulting there from or existing previous to any action by the Town.
Resolution 2002-34
Page 1 of 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15`h day of August 2002.
ATTEST:
(414A
Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY:
terim Town Mana e
i
� .1
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
ARVZkOVED AS TO FORM:
57Z
William E. Farrell, Town Attorney
Resolution 2002-34
Page 2 of 2
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Town Council
THROUGH: Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager
FROM: Jesse Drake, AICP J D
Interim Director of Community Development
DATE: August 15, 2002
SUBJECT: Consideration of ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FOUNTAIN
HILLS MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION to accept the
proposal for the Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan submitted by Premier Engineering
and complete a contract for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 for fiscal year 2002-03.
The Fountain Hills McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission met on August 6, 2002 to open and
review the proposals for the Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan that had been received in response to a
Request For Proposal that had been sent out in June to three design firms. As a part of the proposal
process, members of the Preservation Commission and staff had participated in site visits with the candidate
firm representatives.
All of the design firms receiving an RFP responded to the request for proposal. One firm's proposal did not
meet the criteria outlined in the RFP. Of the two qualified candidates, the Preservation Commission voted
to recommend awarding the project to Premier Engineering. A copy of the proposal is attached.
Proposal Analysis:
Firm Name
Met Proposal
Proposed
Criteria?
Fee
Premier Engineering
yes
$15,250-$21,000
Douglas Architecture & Planning
yes
$25,000-$48,000
Dibble & Associates
no
none submitted
July 22, 2002
Jesse Drake
Interim Director
Community Development
16836 East Palisades Blvd., Bldg. C
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
RE: Request for Proposals
Fountain Hills McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission
Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan
Dear Ms. Drake:
ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Premier Engineering Corporation (Premier) is very pleased to respond to your request for proposal
for Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan. Our Team's specialization in open space, trails, park and
recreation planning, environmental resources, and design projects enables us to understand and
effectively respond to the specific issues associated with this type of project. We have selected
Roberts/Jones Architects, Inc. as our Team member based on their individual expertise and
commitment to product excellence, environmental sensitivity, and ability to assist us in meeting the
architectural needs of the citizens of Fountain Hills for this unique and environmentally sensitive
project.
The Premier Team has proven experience and dedication to meet the needs of our clients, while
providing fresh perspective and innovative solutions. Significant factors, which we believe make our
Team uniquely qualified for this special project include:
+ Proven approach to desert open space design and landscape planning.
+ Project specific public participation programs focused on public need and acceptance.
+ Trail and recreation design specialist.
+ Utilization of leading edge technologies for effective modeling and analysis of influencing
factors.
+ Award winning recognition for excellence in desert planning and design.
We appreciate your review of our qualification and are eager to begin work on this important project.
The Premier Team welcomes the opportunity to discuss our qualifications and approach in greater
detail. Please call us if we can provide clarification or be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Premier Engineering Corporation
Je in , RLA, ASLA
.ncipal
Dean A. Chambers, RLA, ASLA
Project Manager
1600 W. Broadway Road, Suite 165 • Tempe, AZ 85282 • (480) 829-6000 • Fax (480) 829-6016
n1",
MISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter
Firm Section
FirmOverview............................................................................................................... 1
FirmCapacity...................................................:.............................................................1
Past Performance
Key Abilities
Relevant Experience
Team Section =
DesignPhilosophy.......................................................................................................... 1
OrganizationChart .......................................................................................................... 2 .
Resumes............................................................................. ................. 3 {
Experience Section
ProjectDescriptions....................................................................................................... 1
Potential Solutions
Site Plan
DesignIdeas ................................................................................. .............................. 2
FeeEstimate.................................................................................................................. 1 kT .
- i
Table of Contents Page i
ENOINEERINO GORPORA.TION
Firm
ap
Ir
� '"� �„�; • .. ;e'er i
{. -<q'1 �' • 1, .y
� t _. i ram• "."L. ><. C
,yam
t }'x yam' �' �. .�`. .•` j' l r�., .�,/Tti�;lj/s� yy\+ �S ,f ..'a -" j•, r..l '*}"ys'}F^g3�'r.•
' - �L f � , �'�t T �. M fir• ` �'� i.'J•'� • f � �) �.
�- ..T �i1 'a •t
r is „t + -� o- + '� • •� : xi ,� c 3 r ,�a ti [ r . . , "•i L s - F ,� ' ;IR
� f•' ys'�Q^tyty,Jt y>�1�f�'� �•!�y tj -�" p'� r � t•�� '� �..',r'� k' '� fir•..
� 't{. , f� I}•.� . d�ll F J Z• . %� �ty.+2�..,'i!. `t; r
IV
t.
,
i t���' Y r � '`� , � .1• r _�'+-r lr.i1 '! ��isS�i�` "' -�•r ,r' - •�� ��cs : 1- DY
.'f
�Fi MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDS CAPE PLAN
11
N.Z;;%
FIRM OVERVIEW
Premier Engineering Corporation (Premier) was
founded in 1995. Today with principals experienced
in the fields of landscape architecture, civil engineering,
structural engineering, and water resources
engineering, Premier is truly a multi -disciplined firm
capable of completing large-scale public works
projects with in-house capabilities. Since our
inception, Premier has been commissioned for more
than 270 contracts. Last year alone Premier was
responsible for more than 3.5 million dollars in design
fees for the public sector.
We owe our success thus far to the high level of client
confidence in the excellent performance of Premier.
We take pride in our responsiveness to the needs
of the clients, our adherence to the project schedule
and budget and our reasonable fee estimates.
With a full time staff of 31, Premier is one ofthe largest
multi -discipline M/DBE firms in the valley. Our staff
level includes 13 registered professionals (4
Registered Landscape Architects), 9 design
professionals, 4 CADD designers and 5
administration personnel. The majority of our
experience has been gained through the completion
of public works projects for local governmental
agencies which include the Maricopa County Parks
and Recreation Department, Maricopa County
Department of Transportation (MCDOT), Flood
Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC),
Town of Queen Creek, cities of Mesa, Phoenix,
Scottsdale, Tempe, Peoria, Goodyear, Casa Grande,
and Glendale; Pinal County, and Arizona Department
of Transportation (ADOT).
Our Landscape Architectural Department consists of
10 professionals with a combined experience of over
90 years. During the past year, the landscape
architectural staff was responsible for the design of
close to one million dollars and over ten million dollars
in related construction activities.
The well-rounded and creative staff at Premier
has the unique ability to design projects that are
able to be implemented without sacrificing
creativity.
Because Premier's principals are "hands-on" working
project managers, Fountain Hills is assured that its
project will receive close attention to detail and
responsive service that is often lacking in larger firms
that have a multi -level chain of command to work
through to complete a project. Premier is able to
provide Fountain Hills with high -quality services
performed by experienced professionals within
budget and schedule requirements.
FIRM CAPACITY
Premier has the personnel, resources and financial
capabilities to initiate and complete this trailhead
design and landscape plan for the McDowell
Mountain Preservation Commission in accordance
with your time schedule and with exceptional and
unmatched quality.
We have recently completed or will be completing
projects for the cities of Phoenix, Peoria, and Casa
Grande and the town of Queen Creek that have
significantly freed up the landscape architectural staff,
making them available for this project.
PAST PERFORMANCE
The Premier Team was selected based on skills, relevant
experience, and sincere desire to contribute to this
project. Premier has developed a long-term
relationship with Roberts/Jones Architects, Inc.
(Roberts/Jones) through their involvement on
numerous projects. This will not be the first time that
these Team members have worked together on a
successful project.
These Team members have experience delivering
projects that are directly applicable in terms of scope
and content. Experience with projects requiring the
Firm Section
Page 1
n,A�MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
`� -
coordination of multiple disciplines and extensive
public involvement is a speciality of Premier's
Landscape Architecture Department. In addition, our
Team possess the technical skills necessary to conduct
a thorough analysis, identify operational concerns,
opportunities and constraints for design, and develop
effective implementation strategies.
KEY ABILITIES
Specific Team abilities to meet key project
requirements:
Desert Lands / Open Space Planning & Design
- Sound planning and design methodologies for
defensible planning implementation and design
strategies.
- Contextual project design.
- "Ground Truth" field testing of design concepts
in preliminary stages to confirm positive
relationships with the desert environment.
- Utilization of design techniques to reduce impacts
to views and environment.
Public Participation
- Listen and incorporate public input into the master
plan.
- Use of interactive exercises to gain greater
participation.
Computer Modeling and Analysis
- Development of concepts and design ideas
utilizing 3-D Modeling as an analytical tool.
Park Projects with Trail Systems & Parking
- Over the past 5 years Premier's landscape
architecture staff has completed 30 parks and
recreation facilities with a value ofover 72 million -
dollars in construction.
Firm Section Page 2
ENGINEERING GORPORI.TION
JyrtNn h,`
v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
J
Relevant Experience
t
F
2
to
SaladoFao Environme s
Corp or Engineers / City or Phoenix
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
�r
V
/
N
erramar
city of Peoria
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
V /
✓
Tempe Trail Improvements
City or Tealpe
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
V/
✓
✓
✓
Steelen
City of Phoenix
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Consolidated rai
City or Chandler
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Scottsdale Trails as r
City or Scottsdaie
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
e Creek RegionalArea
itsRecreation
Y rlcopa County ParksD.partal.11t
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Scottsdale Desert s Design e Ines
City or Scottsdale
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
nsa Park
City of Peoria
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Cholla Park�r
City of Phoenix
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
V/
✓
✓
City of Phoenix s eserve n e
City of Phoenix
✓
✓
✓
✓Ed
/
Per Athletic Complex e
City or Casa Grand.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
WO
Toren of Queen Croat
✓
✓
✓
✓
un ers e
Tosrn or Queen Crook
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Flardy Warner Athletic Complex
City or toque
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
r e Park
Torn or Queen Croat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
10wanis @
City of Peoria
,/
,/
✓
,/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Neighborhoodmprovemen ode
crry or aland.ie
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
w River Kwanis e
Y rleopa county Pub Dept.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
NDrth Campus e
City of Casa Grande
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
�r
/
�r
Paiute @
Flood Control Dist. Yricopa CountyPeart
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
V
/
Y
Park @
City or Case Grande
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Recker& Thomas Roads Communitye
t
City or rose
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rose Mofford Sports Complex
City of Phoenix
,/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Steeple!Peoria
City
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
Sundance @
City of Peoria
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
nnya pe
City o/ Peoria
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sweetwater✓
City or Peoria is
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Tumbleweed Community✓
Cof Chandler
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓City
West chandler Regional m plex e
City or Chandler
__
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
�V��NYaY LJ4r61 R114.i VI L wanl V Jdm Derz
Finn Section Page 3
Team
AI
54
i a •� �
NOV
VIC—
t\ a `� i r � • 1 . i. , /= i � � aFr! � �+' L + r �4. �.�,+ � .R 4Y r'• ~� y, ..:
c � to � �. s� r - �. �C. i �, 1 r r y t '�'7' � •
r � � 9[ �. � . ,fit'""" •.� � �� a°. �,{g• k .F ,.
•.�,
1, � +.r ,�.� �J'/' `. " � r� � ' •r• • ,.a �� �i r�y}� %. '} ,}� ♦ , � i - � - - r '?F••' ... '+xl 1*, '.
- s. ." ''�! ? �. '' �` (fit t�� :'��, . • /"L�
- t ~ '. •' _7`t}F#•�' ..'bi r �f L, A . �yYi'w,-a1. i+�' .- �� r�Y..A.i - . l� r �r r,
�'-' - � ► +,y � 1 t1�• � r dL� '�'!�y •, �y? ��-�` ,�,i„•:.t �1"rMt. -:Ij'r }'�''-..' '•S`t+; IT
/,. ..� •�,� �,+ c- •i^ - � .. l ice' t� ? r C� ;Z�r'.� ti%t { r ,. ♦ a. i� .. S 4,'► 1 ,\fet
�^' r t. , i, �t� 1�•` 1 � -t4.1 �Vl T �.' T � • / f y� ���.,/ " rt•• � �.Il' :i Si
16
' � F�1 ��,�' f�' � •+1F �`r'� � '• ^', � � � t c�' �'^ ✓ •,� '�`'Y,�r Sr'i�.{jyf� 1r�� (l ,
.3'� S,� ; •- r Z,I •tif Yi �r, a/ r i. 94 ` Y � ♦ -,'��� j�� jam` '+�
l .T rZ+ � ,`jr� '�✓� iF3� J"•� ,�y,'sfi . i ./ ''r
/T 1 •i ir. r�r a(: Via, `���1- �4Yril.�.y�� r� ti j�r,�'.��'�� •r" � �� ,vr �:
�NTAIN yi
`�. McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
,e
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The Sonoran desert is a unique and beautiful place
with special requirements for living. Just as we tread lightly
when we hike a scenic desert trail, we must also tread
lightly with our constructed improvements. These
improvements (trails, trailheads, comfort facilities, parking,
roads, etc.) if planned for and designed correctly promise
to enhance our interaction with the natural
environment. There are significant examples throughout
the valley where the "improvement" creates a negative effect
to the environment (disturbed vegetation, scars, interrupted
views, un-natural forms, noise, glare, etc.) degrading the
desired natural experience. We believe in using our skills
and experiences as designers to provide the most
natural and enhanced environmental experience,
enriching the lives of those who interact with the
facility and site.
We intend on utilizing our proven methods of design to
execute this commission for the best possible product.
These techniques include:
Earth integrated sensitive siting of buildings, roads and
other structures
Native materials; stone, decomposed granite,
vegetation
Water harvesting
Alternative and green building materials; rammed earth,
gabion baskets, "eco" block, Rasta block, desert
masonry, rust patina metal
"Ground truth" field verification of design concepts
prior to construction activities
Minimum import/export of materials from site
Low profile/massing of structures
Native desert colors
Protection of view -sheds onto and off of the site
In the end the experience we have ofhiking the trail, hearing
the crunch of the path under our boots, the smell of the
creosote after a rain, the view to the mountains are the
ultimate test of our endeavors. We intend to bring
enjoyment to the souls of the future users of this
facility while minimizing impacts to "mother earth's"
soul in the process.
Team Section
Page 1
EN6INEERIN6 CORPOR..TIpN
Y \v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
ORGANIZATION CHART
Planning /
Landscape Architecture
Jeff Velasquez, RLA
Harry Woelzlein, RLA
Rick Campbell, LAIT
Kurt Montei, ALSA
Patricia Butler, ASLA
Premier
Fountain Hills
Project Manager
Jeff Enpelmann, RLA ASLA
Principal -in -Charge
Premier
Dean A. Chambers, RLA ASLA
Project Manager
Premier
Civil / Drainage
Jeff Holzmeister, P.E.
Pat Fyie, P.E.
Mike Luecker, P.E.
Premier
Team Section Page 2
Architecture
Jonathan Peiffer, AIA
Roberts/Jones Architects
.iTA1.V y�
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
JEFF ENGELMANN, RLA
PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE
Jeff is a Principal of Premier Engineering Corporation with over 17 years of landscape
EDUCATION
architecture experience and has been involved in a wide variety of projects throughout
BLA, Landscape
Arizona Jeffprovides
p management and guidance forproject design and plan preparation,
Architecture 1983
client coordination to ensure information essential to our design services is responsive to
Iowa State
the required standards, and assists in the supervision of project development and office
University
AutoCAD Management
administration. Jef's area ofexpertise is revegetation, master planning, recreation planning
& Aut CAD
and design and development of construction documents. He has been involved in numerous
Professional 1988
Drainage Channel Enhancements, River Trails, Streetscapes, Park and Recreation Master
CADD Institute
Tempe, Arizona
Plans, Construction Document development and public input process. In addition to the
technical expertise of parks and recreation analysis, the majority of these projects have
REGISTRATION
also required public involvement, the development of construction cost estimates, and
Landscape Architect
benefit/cost analyses to determine the economic feasibility of a specific recreation plan.
State of Arizona
State of Missouri
Jeff has managed and coordinated landscape architecture and recreation projects for
State of Kansas
various local public agencies.
Relevant experience includes the following:
Rio Salado Environmental Restoration; (Corp of Engineers/City of Phoenix) -
Lead Landscape Architect for this five -mile project which includes field investigations,
the preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material
consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. Premier
is responsible for the Landscape Architectural planning, design and implementation. These
services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks
and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities.
Terramar Park; (City of Peoria) - Principal in Charge of this 25-acre parcel of land
nestled in the far northwest valley. The site is very unique for an urban municipal park in
that the site backs up to the native and undeveloped New River corridor and is composed
of native undisturbed desert with the unique character of the Sonoran Desert and the site
has several significant native wash corridors that traverse the site adding to the topographic
and plant material diversity of the site. Premier was responsible for extensive public
involvement with four public meetings attended on average at each meeting by over 100
citizens and the use of a general park survey to gather the pulse of the surrounding
neighborhood. The result of this extensive input process is a park plan that is a balance of
turf and open space, basketball courts, an urban skate park elements, extensive trail
system, parking for up to 50 cars and a restroom. These elements were all designed to
blend into the site and are all encompassed and wrapped around and through a preserved
and enhance desert ecosystem including the protection and use of the native washes as
significant features of the parks development.
Team Section Page 3
ENGINEERING CORPORATION
%" JAJN y�
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
b� Med
JEFF ENGELMANN, RLA
` w PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE - CONTINUED
New River Kiwanis Park; New River, AZ (Maricopa County Parks Department) -Premier provided professional
services for park master planning for this 80-acre regional park in New River, Arizona. The park is part of the
Maricopa County parks system. As Project Manager, Jeff's efforts include the master planning of this rugged
mountain park. The park was master planned to accommodate a community center complex that will include
a multi -generational facility, kitchen, senior center, gym, classrooms, weight room, and a family aquatic center.
The park plan also includes separate areas for both a professional and therapeutic rodeo horse arenas with
improved covered spectator seating, large corporate and individual picnic ramadas, extensive trail network,
restroom buildings, overnight RV camping areas, tent camping areas, and a 300-person amphitheater.
Estrella Mountain Regional Park; Goodyear, AZ (Maricopa County Parks Department) - Prc j ect Landscape
Architect responsibilities included the development of the master plan and construction documents for this 3
million dollar park improvement located in Mancopa County. The improvements included developing construction
documents for 2 lighted and fenced softball fields, restroom facility, large tot lot/adventure play ground area,
new entry, new maintenance building, maj or road circulation patterns, and several new parking lots. The plans
and documents were all completed on AutoCAD allowing the client the opportunity to review on screen the
drawings and make changes as issues were discussed.
Rillito RiverBicycle & Equestrian Trails; (City of Tucson) - Project Manager. His responsibilities included
recreational facility master planning, cost estimating, specifications, facilitation at working group meetings,
1%W coordination with Pima County, and the Corps of Engineers, and construction document development ofthe
trail facilities that spanned over 10 miles for both sides of the River and included: pedestrian plaza areas,
equestrian staging areas, parking lots, utility extensions, restrooms, and 16 pedestrian bridges that both spanned
the Rillito River itselfand the numerous tributaries that feed the river. The five million dollar project was recently
completed and opened for public use.
West Valley Recreation Corridor- Jeff served as the project manager for this extensive trail system project.
His responsibilities included recreational facility master planning for the development of a trail system that
would traverse the river corridor from the Waddel Dam following the alignment of the Agua Fria River to the
Gila River a distance of well over 30 miles. The concept for a recreational trail along this corridor was developed
for John F. Long Properties Inc. and established the design theme and approach that Mr. Long has since taken
to the various Cities and Towns that line the corridor promoting the development of this recreational trail
system. Portions of the project are currently under design by the surrounding communities and the concept is
being adopted by those communities as open space in their planning and zoning endeavors. The original
documents have assisted the adjacent communities in adopting rules and regulations for development of this
open space associated with private and public development activities adjacent to the corridor.
Arizona Canal Diversion Channel Recreational Development; (City of Glendale) - As Project Manager,
Jeff's responsibilities included recreational facility master planning, cost estimating, specifications, facilitation at
working group meetings, coordination with the City of Glendale Arizona, and the Corps of Engineers, and
construction document development of the 3 mile section of recreational development that included: extensive
pedestrian/bicycling and equestrian trails, active sports areas including volleyball and basketball courts, soccer
Team Section Page 4
ENO�NEERINO GORPORIITION
�rvun y�
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
JEFF ENGELMANN, RLA
PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE - CONTINUED
fields, fitness courses, picnic facilities, adventure play areas, interpretive gardens one specifically developed for
the blind, and extensive pedestrian plazas that included restrooms, picnicking ramadas and hardscape areas.
All of these enhancements were developed with the flooding potential of the channel inherent in their development,
orientation and placement relative to the channel and the flow of water. This project has been recognized for
design excellence by the Corps of Engineers.
Tumbleweed Park Phase III; (City ofChandler) - Prc j ect Manager responsible for revising the master plan
for this phase of the parks development and developing the final construction documents for this 80-acre
community park located within the City of Chandler. The project tasks included the evaluation of the existing
park master plan, development of a revised park master plan to accommodate the new features and functions
associated with the parks usage, design and layout of a performance stage, large gathering areas for the annual
Chandler Festival, Hardscape promenades to a central plaza, water features parking lots, electrical for lighting
parking, walkways and the required grading, drainage and water & sewer extensions. Included with the plans
were specifications and associated cost estimates.
West Chandler Park; (City ofChandler) - Project Manager responsible for the master plan and developing
the final construction documents for this 40-acre community park located within the City of Chandler. The
project tasks included the master planning of the park, and design and layout of a three field softball complex,
IL centrally located restroom/concessions building, maintenance building and storage area, soccer/football field,
small pee -wee ball field overlays spectator seating for all of the ball fields, parking lots, electrical for lighting
parking, walkways and the required grading, drainage and water & sewer extensions.
Team Section Page 5
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
DEAN CHAMBERS, RLA
`► PROJECT MANAGER
Dean has the management skills to meet the design goals of the client while ensuring
EDUCATION
technical issues are address in an effective manner.
BLA, Landscape
Architecture, Minor in
Dean has more than 20 years ofprofessional experience in master planning, site analysis,
Geography 1980
programming, design guideline, facilitation ofpublic involvement and information programs
Oklahoma State
University
and workshops, design development, construction documents and construction
observation services for award -winning projects. He has served as project manager on
REGISTRATION
a variety of large-scale design projects specializing in open space.
Landscape Architect
State of Arizona
Dean has directed teams on proj ects including master planning for parks and recreational
State of Oklahoma
facilities, corporate, industrial, commercial, and residential development. These projects
required the organization and overall direction of multi -disciplinary tams including in-
house disciplines and specialty consultants.
Relevant key projects include the following:
Tempe Butte Trail Improvements; (City of Tempe) - Project Landscape Architect
responsible for the design of the trails system for Tempe Butte including construction
drawings forphase one implementation. Trail alignments followed existing scars to minimize
visual/grading impacts fragile
on the vegetative cover. Guidelines developed for Papago
Park were followed in developing seating areas, trail markers and trail furnishings (benches,
walls, trash receptacles and signage). The lower butte trail was designed for the physically
handicapped with upslope trail beds offering more challenge for experienced hikers.
Emphasis was placed on future expansion of trails within Papago Park to respond to
future developments along the Rio Salado and downtown Tempe along Mill Avenue.
Trail alignments addressed critical areas ofdrainage, erosion, visual impact and subsequent
revegetation of disturbed areas of the butte.
Consolidated Canal Initial Feasibility Study; (City of Chandler) - Project Manager
responsible for the preparation of the feasibility study determining the potential recreation
and transit uses along the canal. The study defines the parameters for the project, including
goals, issues, constraints, ideas and improvements. Some ofthe improvements include
trailheads, interpretive centers, multi -use trails, signage, and lighting, drinking fountains
and emergency call box.
Cave Creek Regional Recreation Area; (Maricopa County) - Project Landscape
Architect and overall project coordinator for Phases I and II of this 8500-acre county
regional park. Facilities include off -site utilities extension, roads, hiking trails, trailheads,
bikeways, drainage features, maintenance compound, development of family and group
picnic facilities; 40 campsites; and seven comfort stations.
Team Section Page 6
ENOINEERINp GORPpRATIpV
�• MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
DEAN CHAMBERS, RLA
`- PROJECT MANAGER - CONTINUED
Scottsdale Desert Parks Design Guidelines; (Scottsdale) - Project Manager coordinated with the City
of Scottsdale to create the Desert Parks Design Guidelines project. This project established standards and
objectives through which parks are to be created in order to capitalize upon the natural beauty of the Sonoran
desert and meet the needs of the growing metropolitan -Phoenix community. The Scottsdale Desert Parks
Design Guidelines book is intended to assist in the evaluation of potential additional park sites, and provide
guidance in the development of future recreational facilities. The book addresses the components of site
selection and evaluation, site planning and design and development goals.
Steele Indian School Park; (City of Phoenix) - Project Manager for a 75-acre park that has been a
redevelopment of a historic Phoenix Indian School site. Park features will include the historic core, Native
American garden, conservatory/ amphitheater, community linkages, and the Phoenix Green, promontory and
neighborhood park.
Apache Neighborhood Park; (City ofScottsdale) - Proj ect Manager for an eight -acre park that includes a
playground, restrooms and ramadas. Services include Landscape Architecture, demolition, survey, civil,
structural, mechanical/electrical engineering, architecture, irrigation and hardscape features.
Lake Pleasant Regional Park Master Plan; (Maricopa County) - Project Landscape Architect for the
finalizing development of a comprehensive master plan for this 24,500-acre regional park. Work included the
review and evaluation of existing data, evaluation of the affected environment and natural resources within the
park, and the review and evaluation of public opinion surveys. Also conducted open house presentations
throughout the valley to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on developed plans.
McCormick/Stillman Railroad Park; (City ofScottsdale) - Project Manager for the major renovations to
the 23-year-old McCormick -Stillman Railroad Park in 1997. The project was designed to preserve the park's
historic features and enhance use and activities. Improvements include a new shaded passenger platform for
the 5/12th scale "Paradise and Pacific Railroad" that chugs over three trestles and a tunnel around the 30-acre
park. A new entry greets visitors with the full-size static train display, a restored historic carousel and a new
station building. The central plaza is a public green created to provide a center point within the park and space
for special events.
McCormick Railroad Park Master Plan; (City of Scottsdale) - Project Landscape Architect on the
master plan for this 30-acre specialty park. Key components include the development and expansion of a plan
that incorporates and elaborates on the thematic elements of the existing miniature railroad amusement rides.
Solicitation of public input was essential and was achieved through the use of open public meetings, wall
mapping sessions and children's workshops. Existing features and structures were evaluated for how they met
the users' needs, maintenance costs and correlation to the railroad theme.
Papago Park/Tempe Butte Design Guidelines; (City of Tempe) -Project Landscape Architect responsible
for design guidelines for Papago Park and Tempe Butte, a desert open space in the center of the Tempe urban
core. The guidelines determined elements of the park such as pedestrian circulation and nodes, structures,
r. parking, security lighting, etc. In addition to specific design elements, the study addressed the impact of future
Team Section Page 7 , ,
ENOINEERINO CORPORATION
-T-TA,N 4
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r �s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
DEAN CHAMBERS, RLA
�► PROJECT MANAGER - CONTINUED
surrounding development such as the east Papago Freeway, Rio Salado and Tempe's downtown redevelopment.
The study defined treatments for transition zones from the urban fringes to the Desert Park.
Chofla Neighborhood park; (City ofScottsdale) - Landscape Architect responsible for the master planning
and construction documents for this north Scottsdale neighborhood park. Key issues were protection of native
desert areas on -site, interface between the park and the school, grading and preparation of ball fields, and
management of runoffand drainage through the site. Construction administration services included review and
inspection of grading court surfaces, volleyball, landscape planting, walks and hardscape, playground, restroom
building and ramadas, and lighting.
Williams Gateway Airport Streetscape, Signage & Landscape Master Plan; (City of Mesa) - Proj ect
Manager responsible for the preparation of the landscape and streetscape master plan for Williams Gateway
Airport to ensure a quality commercial and aviation facility. The master plan establishes guidelines promoting
the image of the desert tech design theme, and identifies design criteria for the development of the entry,
streetscape, tenant lots and public spaces. A comprehensive signage program was developed providing efficient
circulation into and throughout the project, and effectively expressing the desert tech design theme through the
materials and forms of the signs.
Four Corners Monument; (AZ, CO, NM, UT) - Senior Associate for the redevelopment of the Four Corners
Monument. This project included Native American Interpretive Center, new restroom buildings, vending booths,
new monument design, plazas, parking lot, picnic areas, drought to learnt landscape and irrigation. This project
also included coordination with the Federal Government, the four states involved, the Navajo Nation and the
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.
The Reserve at Apache Peak, Desert Mountain; (City ofScottsdale) - Project Landscape Architect for
the entry monument, streetscape and revegetation of this exclusive custom lot subdivision. High Sonoran
desert plant materials were salvaged and relocated on the site along with new plantings and seeding.
Vee Quiva Casino; (Gila River Indian Community, AZ) - Project Manager responsible for the site design
of the Vee Quiva Casino. The project is a Sonoran desert themed gaming center located on the Gila River
Native American Community in central Arizona. Native desert revegetation of this site provided a healing from
the impact of years of abuse, neglect and development. Roadways, parking, drainage corridors and basins
along with buildings were sensitively sited and the native landscape restored to mitigate impacts.
The central focal point is a sculptural "ruins" and desert "seep" located at the building entry. The design team
worked with tribal artist who produced culturally significant baskets and pottery relating to the heritage of the
Gila River NativeAmerican Community.
Team Section Page 8
ENGINEERING GORVORATION
�rru.v yi
'f MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ti..
TRAILHEAD
JEFF VELASQUEZ,
DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
RLA
PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
EDUCATION
BS, Landscape
Architecture 1994
Polytechnic
University, Pomonz
REGISTRATION
Landscape Architect
State of Arizona
Team Section
Jeff has more than 6 years of landscape architectural experience, working on a wide
variety of projects for both private sector clients and public agencies. His experience
includes design and construction management, large-scale park and open space master
planning, entry monumentation and streetscape design for major planned community
developments, recreational design, public participation, environmental restoration, and
construction administration projects.
A representative sampling ofkey projects include Rio Salado Environmental Restoration,
Sky Harbor Airport's Mohave Parking Facility, streetscape and entry monumentation
improvements for Del Webb's Sun City Grand and Sun City Summerlin, environmental
restoration and public facility design for the five -mile Rio Salado project in Phoenix, the
Pima Freeway Aesthetic Wall Enhancements in Scottsdale, streetscape and
monumentation for Stetson Hills in north Phoenix, and construction administration for the
recently -completed I-10/ 101 freeway interchange in the West Valley.
Relevant experience includes the following:
Rio Salado Environmental Restoration; (Corp of Engineers/City of Phoenix) -
Landscape Architect for this five -mile project which includes field investigations, the
preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material
consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. Premier
is responsible for the Landscape Architectural planning, design and implementation. These
services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks
and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities.
New River Kiwanis Park; New River, AZ (Maricopa County Parks Department) -
Project Designer responsible for master planning this 80-acre regional park in New River,
Arizona. The park, which sits on beautifully lush hillside topography, is part of the Maricopa
County Parks System. The efforts included the master planning of approximately $18
million of site amenities on this rugged mountain park. The site has been master planned
to accommodate a community center complex which will include a multi -generational
facility, kitchen, senior center, library, gymnasium, classrooms, weight room, family aquatic
-enter, and a 400-person hillside amphitheater. The park design also includes separate
ireas for both a professional and therapeutic rodeo arena with improved covered spectator
Seating, a rodeo village center, little league baseball facilities, large corporate and individual
ullside picnic ramadas, extensive trail network, restroom buildings, overnight RV camping
Eone, equestrian staging nodes, and tent camping areas.
kntonio Parkway Ballfields; Rancho Santa Margarita, CA (Rancho Santa
Margarita Company) - Project Designer and Project Manager responsible for developing
he final construction documents for this neighborhood park and Little League facility.
Page 9
J�STAIN y�
f!'c
McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
JEFF VELASQUEZ, RLA
`- PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - CONTINUED
The project provided a unique opportunity, because it involved the design of the park and playfields as well as
the landscape design for an adjacent school, major arterial streetscape, and a connected native bluff -top
pedestrian/equestrian trail. The project tasks included the design and layout of three Little League baseball
fields, children's play areas, a pedestrian walkway system, links to an adjacent elementary school, perimeter
theme wall design, a centrally located restroom/concession building, all building, electrical, and encroachment
pemutting, and electrical for Little League park fighting. Included with the plans were specifications and associated
cost estimates.
West Valley Recreation Corridor; Maricopa County, AZ (John F. Long Properties, Inc.) - This project
involved recreational facility master planning for the development of a trail system that would traverse the Agua
Fria River corridor from the Waddel Dam to the Gila River, well over a distance of 30 miles. The concept for
a recreational trail along this corridor was developed for John F. Long Properties, Inc. and established the
design theme and approach that Mr. Long has since taken to the various Cities and Towns that line the
corridor, promoting the development of this recreational trail system. Portions of the project are currently
under design by the surrounding communities and the concept is being adopted by those communities as open
space in their planning and zoning endeavors. The original documents have assisted the adjacent communities
in adopting rules and regulations for development of this open space associated with private and public
development activities adjacent to the corridor.
Rancho Del Mar Park; Mesa, AZ (City of Mesa) - Project Designer responsible for developing the final
construction documents for this municipal park. The project tasks included the design and layout of basketball
courts, children's play areas, hardscape design, pedestrian circulation, electrical for park lighting, and irrigation
design. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates.
Calbrisa Park; Peoria, AZ (City of Peoria) - Project Designer responsible for working with Mr. Engelmann
on developing the master plans and final construction documents for this neighborhood park. The project tasks
included the master planning of the park, public presentation, and the design and layout of park improvements.
The plans included children's play areas, a pedestrian walkway system, links to an adjacent elementary school,
and siting of elementary school habitat areas and restroom facilities. Included with the plans were specifications
and associated cost estimates.
Northpark Neighborhood Parks; Irvine, CA (The Irvine Company) - Project Designer responsible for
developing the final construction documents for six neighborhood parks. The project tasks included the design
and layout of hardscape and exterior wall theming, pool design, fountain design, centrally located restroom/
concession buildings, pedestrian walks, and electrical for park lighting. Included with the plans were specifications
and associated cost estimates.
Team Section Page 10
yrt�tx yi
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
HARRY WOELZLEIN, RLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
EDUCATION
B.S., Landscape
Architecture 1965
Michigan State
University
REGISTRATION
Landscape Architect
State of Arizona
Team Section
Harry spent more than 36 years at ADOT most recently in the Roadside Development
Section as a Landscape Architecture Supervisor. His responsibilities included supervising
design personnel and coordinating the work of the Landscape Architecture Unit,
establishing work guidelines, carrying out Department policies for highway projects
including erosion control, seeding, revegetation, landscaping and irrigation design, native
plant salvage, architectural treatment of retaining and noise abatement walls, and topsoil
salvage and re -use.
As a Project Manager/Technical Leader for ADOT, Harry was also responsible for
coordinating and monitoring the work of landscape architectural consultants on the State's
interstate and primary routes, Maricopa Association of Governments freeways, and
Transportation Enhancement Projects on a statewide basis. Harry has been preparing
Design Concept Reports (DCR) for Premier's Landscape On -Call Contract withADOT.
Harry has also been assisting Premier's landscape team on ADOT's I-10/I-17 Auxiliary
Lanes project.
ADOT projects designed and constructed include Interstate Safety Rest Areas
and Roadside Parks on various routes and in various communities throughout
the State including: Sacaton Rest Area on I- 10, Cedar Pocket Rest Area on 1-15,
Parks Rest Area on I-40, Christensen Rest Area on I-17, Canoa Ranch Rest Area on I-
19. Roadside Parks include Father Kino Park in Nogales, a pocket park in Nogales,
Miami Mining Park in Miami, Winslow Community Park in Winslow, Benson Historical
Park and Fountain in Benson, Casa Grande Mini Park in Casa Grande, Prescott Founders
Park on SR 89 in Prescott, City of Safford Rest Area and Visitor Center, City of San
Luis International Border Rest Area.
Native revegetation projects designed and constructed include: Interstate 10 from
Ehrenberg — Quartzsite and on Interstate 10 from the South Phoenix City limits to Casa
Grande.
Page 11
Em
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
RICK CAMPBELL, LAIT
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
EDUCATION
B.S., Landscape
Architecture 1993
California
Polytechnic State
University, San Lui,
Obispo
Team Section
Rick has more than 6 years experience with design, site planning, recreational planning,
construction documentation and observation. He has worked on a variety of projects for
both private sector clients and public agencies, on the national, state and local levels as
well as previously working for a firm that specialized in builder landscape packages for
newly built subdivisions throughout the Phoenix Metropolitan area.
Relevant experience includes the following:
Sierra Heights; Mesa, AZ (Approx. 320Acres) - This project involved the development
of a master -planned community for Lennar Communities Development in east Mesa.
Rick was responsible for creating project design elements, streetscape landscaping, wall
design, entry monumentation, signage, trail system, parks and open space design, irrigation
design, and landscape construction documentation and specifications. This project utilized
Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site.
Gilbert Ranch; Gilbert, AZ (Approx. 640 Acres) - Gilbert Ranch is a mixed -use master -
planned community in east Gilbert. Rick's responsibilities for the project included all of
the streetscapes for the development, entry monumentation, wall plans, theme development,
open space/park design, trail system that links the open space throughout the development
and directional signage system that connects and directs the entire flow of traffic within
the development. The work resulted in a complete set of construction documentation.
Mesa Commons Trail and Landscape Project; Mesa, AZ (City of Mesa) - Lead
Landscape Project designer responsible for assisting in the master planning efforts and in
?roduction of the final construction documents for this trail improvement and landscape
idj acent to the Arizona Canal. The project tasks included the master planning of the
available and varying right-of-way along the canal bank to include screening of a new
wall that was under construction and continuation of the canal trail system. The services
ncluded development of base information from as -built records and field measurements,
ievelopment of the master plan, and final construction documents that included landscape
ind irrigation plans.
;undance Park; Peoria, AZ (City of Peoria) - Lead Landscape Project Designer
esponsible for developing the master plan, and design and layout of improvements for
his neighborhood park located within the City of Peoria. Project tasks included the
lesign of a new parking lot, trail system, multi -use fields, playground for several age
;roups, hard surface courts, landscaping, irrigation and linkages to the surrounding
ieighborhoods and adjacent school.
Page 12
JvNTA1N H�!
Cl. MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
RICK CAMPBELL, LAIT
�.. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - CONTINUED
Neighborhood Improvements; (City of Glendale, AZ) - Rick was the Lead Landscape Designer for five
neighborhood projects located in the City of Glendale. These projects involved meetings with each neighborhood
association, developing the master plans, and final construction documents. These five projects were Santa
Grande — Mary Silva Park improvements located at 45d' Avenue j ust south of Rancho Drive; Sahuaro Glenn —
63rd Avenue right-of-way landscape improvements; Wild Horse Ranch — right-of-way landscaping and entry -
monument improvements on the north side of Sunnyside Drive from 591, Avenue east to 571 Avenue; Sunburst
Farms — 51"Avenue right-of-way "Equestrian Trail" landscape design; and Santa Maria — right-of-way
landscape design for the south side of Peoria Avenue from 53rd to 55th Avenues, the east side of 5511 Avenue
from Mountain View Road to PeoriaAvenue, the west side of 53'd Avenue from just north of Heritage Elementary
School to PeoriaAvenue, and the north side of Mountain View Road from 551 Avenue to j ust west of Heritage
Elementary School. Project tasks included design and layout of streetscape improvements, entry monumentation,
hardscape designs, drainage improvements, landscape and irrigation plans, and park design. Included with the
plans were specifications and associated cost estimates.
Master -Planned Communities; Rick provided complete landscape architectural packages for these private
developments that included open space planning and design, recreation design, streetscape design, entry
monumentation, and irrigation plans:
Foothills Parcels 15C,D, & F, Phoenix, AZ
Tatum Ranch, Carefree, AZ
LMcDowell Mountain Ranch, Scottsdale, AZ
Rancho Santa Fe, Avondale, AZ
Clemente Ranch, Chandler, AZ
Gilbert Ranch, Gilbert, AZ
Highlands at Arrowhead Ranch, Glendale, AZ
Mesquite Canyon, Mesa, AZ
Boulder Creek, Mesa, AZ
Mesa Northgrove, Mesa, AZ
Sierra Heights, Mesa, AZ
Cooper Commons, Chandler, AZ
Kempton Crossing, Chandler, AZ
Carino Estates, Chandler, AZ
Kingswood Parke, Surprise, AZ
Parkridge, Peoria, AZ
Deer Village, Peoria, AZ
Team Section Page 13 _ _
SyMN4,
McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
...
�%w
KURT MONTEI, ASLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
EDUCATION
BS, Landscape
Architecture 1998
Arizona State
University
Team Section
Kurt will provide experience in the preparation of complete and accurate construction
documents. He will be responsible for the development of project elements, irrigation
plan production, and landscape construction documentation. His past experience with
desert landscaping plans and plan sheet layout and development will be a tremendous
asset to our team. Kurt has worked on a variety of prof ects for both private sector clients
and public agencies. Kurt's prior experience involves working for a firm that specialized
in builder landscape packages for newly built subdivisions throughout the Phoenix
metropolitan area. His work included extensive streetscape and entry monument
production for these clients.
Relevant experience includes the following:
Rio Salado Environmental Restoration; (Corp of Engineers/City of Phoenix) -
Landscape Architect for this five -mile project which includes field investigations, the
preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material
consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. Premier
is responsible for the LandscapeArrchitectural planning, design and implementation. These
services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks
and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities.
Terramar Park; (City of Peoria) - Project Manager of this 25-acre parcel of land
nestled in the far northwest valley. The site is very unique for an urban municipal park in
that the site backs up to the native and undeveloped New River corridor and is composed
of native undisturbed desert with the unique character of the Sonoran Desert and the site
has several significant native wash corridors that traverse the site adding to the topographic
and plant material diversity of the site. Premier was responsible for extensive public
involvement with four public meetings attended on average at each meeting by over 100
citizens and the use of a general park survey to gather the pulse of the surrounding
neighborhood. The result of this extensive input process is a park plan that is a balance of
turf and open space, basketball courts, an urban skate park elements, extensive trail
System, parking for up to 50 cars and a restroom. These elements were all designed to
blend into the site and are all encompassed and wrapped around and through a preserved
end enhance desert ecosystem including the protection and use of the native washes as
;ignifrcant features ofthe parks development.
inn Groves (320 Acres); Chandler, AZ (Continental Homes) - Kurt was responsible
-or creating project design elements, streetscape landscaping, wall design, entry
nonumentation, signage, trail system, parks and open space design, irrigation design,
and landscape construction documentation and specifications. This project utilized Sonoran
)lant species indigenous to the site.
Page 14
ENOINEERIN6 CORPOR/�TION
�; µTAN yI
4i MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
KURT MONTEI, ASLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - CONTINUED
Mission Valley (640 Acres); Casa Grande, AZ (Private Development) - Kurt was responsible for creating
the conceptual open space plan, project design elements, streetscape landscaping, wall design, entry
monumentation, signage, trail system, parks and open space design, and landscape construction documentation
and specifications. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site.
Stetson Hills (750Acres); Phoenix, AZ (Del Webb) - Kurt was responsible for the native plant salvage and
inventory plans, landscape design and final construction documents for parcels 12 and 13. The work resulted
in a complete set of construction documents. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site.
Carino Estates (450 Acres); Chandler, AZ (Shea Homes) - Kurt was responsible for the landscape design and
final construction documents for this entire development. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous
to the site.
New River Kiwanis Park Master Plan; (Maricopa County Parks Department) - Assisted in master planning
this 80-acre regional park. The site has been master planned to accommodate a community center complex, a
multi -generational facility, kitchen, senior center, library, gymnasium, classrooms, weight room, family aquatic
center, and a 400-person hillside amphitheater. The park design also included separate areas for a professional
and therapeutic rodeo arena with improved covered spectator seating, a rodeo village center, little league
baseball facilities, large corporate and individual hillside picnic ramadas, extensive trail network, restroom
buildings, overnight RV camping zone, equestrian staging, and tent camping areas.
Team Section Page 15
ENQINEERINO GORPORI�TION
Nt,u.v y
a \v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
.WN
PATRICIA BUTLER, ASLA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
EDUCATION
BLA, Landscape
Architecture 2000
Arizona State
University
Geography 1993
C KEVIN WALLIN
Patricia has been involved in landscape architecture, engineering, and estimating for the
past 17 years. Patricia will be one of the key people involved in accurately developing
the final master plan and construction documents into electronic format. Patricia has
assisted Jeff Engelmann most recently on Mesa Grande Park in Mesa, Carr McNatt
Park renovations in Casa Grande, and Sossaman Road Landscape Enhancements in
Mesa.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT
Kevin has been involved in landscape architecture, engineering, and cost estimating for
the past 9 years. Within that period, he has honed his skills as both a designer and
technician. He has extensive training and experience in the utilization ofAutoCAD,
MicroStation and other Cadd software. Kevin assisted Jeff Engelmann on the O'Neil
Park Renovations, Shamrock MHP, Sweetwater Estates, Olive Green Villas, Wild Horse
Ranch, and El Caminito for the City of Glendale and Neighborhood Parks at Calbrisa,
Sunnyslope, Windrose, Sundance, and Country Meadows Parks for the City of Peoria.
Kevin also recently assisted in the production of the New River Kiwanis Park Master
Plan for Maricopa County.
Team Section Page 16
'STAIN &
v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
a..
,%W
yew n Mpd
JEFF HOLZMEISTER,
P.E.
LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - DRAINAGE
EDUCATION
M.S., Water
Resources
Engineering, 1988
University of Kansas
B.S., Civil Engineering,
1983
University of Kansas
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineei
- Civil
State of Arizona
State of Nevada
Team Section
Jeff is a Principal of Premier Engineering Corporation with over 18 years of engineering
experience and has been involved in a wide variety of proj ects throughout Arizona. Jeff
provides management and guidance for project design and plan preparation, client
coordination to ensure information essential to our design services is responsive and to
the required standards, and he assists in the supervision of project development and
office administration. Jeff's area of expertise is water resource engineering, requiring the
analyses of surface water hydrology, open channel hydraulics, and sediment transport
analyses. He has been involved in Drainage Master Plans, channel design, storm drain
design and detention basin design services for local agencies and completed various on -
site and off -site drainage facilities for the MAG freeway system. In addition to technical
engineering analysis, the majority of these projects have also required the development
of construction cost estimates, operation and maintenance plans, and benefit/cost analyses
to determine the economic feasibility of a specific flood control or drainage plan.
Jeff has managed and coordinated water resource projects with Fountain Hills, the
FCDMC, MCDOT, ADOT and other local agencies.
SR 87 from Shea Boulevard to McDowell Road; (ADOT) - Performed concept study
for 51 drainage crossings for an 11-mile section of State Route 87. Design plans and
specifications were prepared for this stretch from Mesa to Fountain Hills.
Deer Valley Road Bridge over New River, Peoria, AZ (MCDOT) - Mr. Holzmeister is
currently serving as Project Engineer for the Deer Valley Road Bridge project. He will be
responsible for developing design alternatives for the proposed New River crossing.
Design alternatives will include at -grade crossing, RCBC, and bridge. It is anticipated
that a drop structure will be required for the project. Mr. Holzmeister will be responsible
for the hydraulic analysis and sediment transport analysis for the project He will coordinate
the design with the FCDMC, MCDOT, City of Peoria, City of Glendale, and private
citizens. The design alternatives will integrate river alignments, trail systems, and architectural
treatments recommended in the Middle New River Watercourse Master Plan.
Upper Indian Bend Wash Regional Drainage and Flood Control Plan; (City of
Scottsdale, City ofPhoenix, FCDMC, ADOT, COE, SLD) - Project included extensive
HEC-1 modeling to develop runoff hydrographs for both existing and forecast future
conditions. Hydrologic information was used to develop concept plans for a composite
drainage system consisting of open channels, storm drains, detention basins, building
setbacks, elevation pads, and reserved floodplain areas for the area north of the CAP.
The study served as a foundation for development of the Desert Greenbelt and ADOT
freeway system in north Phoenix and Scottsdale.
Page 17
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
JEFF HOLZMEISTER, P.E.
`'�► LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - DRAINAGE - CONTINUED
Tierra Norte, Sweetwaterphwe, and Steeple Hill Parks; (City ofPeoria) - Premier Engineering was responsible
for developing the master plans and the final construction documents for these three pocket parks located
within the City of Peoria. The project tasks included the master planning of each park, public involvement
process at Tierra Norte, and design and layout of basin improvements at each of these three parks. The
improvements to these existing sites included concrete walkways, picnic ramadas, new turf areas for open
play, and drainage improvements into each of the facilities. Included with the plans were specifications and
associated cost estimates developed throughout the design process. Mr. Engelmann has been retained by the
City of Peoria to assist in construction observation of these three projects.
Kiwansis Park Improvements; (City ofPeoria)
Premier Engineering was responsible for developing the master plans and the final construction documents for
this neighborhood park located within the City of Peoria. The project tasks included the master planning of the
park, and design and layout of park improvements. The improvements to this existing site included concrete
walkways, linkage to existing picnic ramadas, new playground equipment, lighting of facilities, and a new
restroom building. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates developed
throughout the design process.
North Scottsdale General Plan; (City ofScoltsdale) - Project included extensive HEC-1 modeling to develop
runoffhydrographs for both existing and forecast future conditions. Hydrologic information was used to develop
concept plans for a composite drainage system consisting of open channels, storm drains, detention basins,
building setbacks, elevation pads, and reserved floodplain areas for the area north of the CAP. The study
served as a foundation for development planning in north Scottsdale.
Grading and Drainage Experience:
Rose Garden Estates; Fleet -Fisher Engineering
Rim Top Ranch Mogollon Ranch; Fleet -Fisher Engineering
130' Street / Turquoise (Black Mountain Estate); Fleet -Fisher Engineering
Troon Canyon Resort; Fleet -Fisher Engineering
Sonoran Ridge Estates; Fleet -Fisher Engineering
Granite Mountain Ranch (1441' Street / Lone Mountain Road; Fleet -Fisher Engineering
Marble Mountain Ranch; Fleet -Fisher Engineering
US Army Yuma Proving Grounds; Jason Associates
Appaloosa Meadows, Phase 2; Kelly/Wise Engineering
Mountain View Mobile Home Park; Kelly/Wise Engineering
Luke Ranch 40 Acre Development; Makai Developers
Village at South Mountain Drainage Study; Makai Developers
Team Section Page 18
McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD
_4
PAT FYIE, P.E.
DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - CIVIL
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering
1972
University of Illinois
REGISTRATION
Professional Enginee
- Civil
State of Arizona
State of Alabama
State of Illinois
State of Mississippi
State of Tennessee
State of Utah
Pat has more than 29 years of experience in management, planning, and design of
transportation, public works, and land development projects. His experience includes 8
years as the Public Works Administrator/County Engineer for Hamilton County, Tennessee,
where he was responsible for a staff of 200 and the overall operations of the Public
Works Division, which consists of Highways, Building Inspection, Sanitation, Engineering,
and General Services. His experience with transportation projects includes airport facilities,
highways, traffic systems, and land development.
Pat also has extensive experience in analysis of river mechanics at highway crossings;
designs for detention basins, storm drains, open channels, drop structures, and other
drainage improvements; and supervision and coordination of surveying and planning for
land development for residential, commercial, and industrial uses; transportation; water
distribution; and wastewater systems.
10'i Street Area Streetscape; Chattanooga, TN (City of Chattanooga) - Design of
1,945 linear feet (LF) of streetscape in Phases I and II and 1,790 LF in Phases III and
IV. Project consisted of sidewalk pavers, pedestrian lights, curbs, trees and other related
improvements.
Brainerd Road Streetscape; Chattanooga, TN (City of Chattanooga) - Design of 700
LF of streetscape including concrete sidewalks, curbs, pedestrian lights, trees and street
resurfacing.
Santan Freeway (202L) from Arizona Avenue to Gilbert Road; Chandler, AZ
(F,a-thtech/AD07) - As Drainage Engineering Manager Pat was responsible for developing
on -site hydrology for use in the design of a 150 cfs. pump station. Other responsibilities
included the determination of storage facilities, wet well configuration and pump selection.
Outer Loop Project; Phoenix, AZ (ADOT) - Project drainage engineer for the 52-mile
Outer Loop Project. Responsible for development of hydrology, drainage design concepts,
alternative systems, and final design and specifications. Prepared analysis ofriver mechanics
at highway crossing of several waterways, designed detention basins, storm drains, open
channels, drop structures, and other improvements.
24" Water Transmission Main — Kyrene Road to the Roosevelt Water Production
Facility; Chandler, AZ (City ofChandler) - As Project Manager Pat was responsible for
preparing the plans and specifications for this water transmission main on the Frye Road
Alignment from Kyrene Road to the Roosevelt Water Production Facility with connections
to the existing water distribution system. This water transmission main will help meet
increasing water demands in Chandler.
Team Section Page 19
`vrt,ux y�
4, McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
` a TRAILHEAD
r
PAT FYIE, P.E.
DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
`r.. LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - CIVIL - CONTINUED
Tumbleweed Park Phase III; Chandler, AZ (City of Chandler) - Pat was the Civil Engineering Manager
responsible for design and coordination of side grading, drainage, paving, and utilities including the preparation
of associated construction documents. Tumbleweed Park is a 190-acre park located on the southwest corner
of Germann and McQueen Roads. Amenities that will be designed in Phase III include the extension of the
internal roadway, a stage area, sidewalks, large group picnic areas, restroom, parking areas, lighting and
landscaping. Premier was responsible for the design and development of construction documents for this
phase of the park.
Public Works Director, Chattanooga, TN (Hamilton County Government) - Responsible for overall operations
of the Public Works Division, which consists of the Highway, Building Inspection, Sanitation, Engineering, and
General Services departments. The Highway Department maintains approximately 900 miles of streets and
highways. Codes and zoning enforcement are the primary functions of the Building Inspections Department.
Operation of the county landfill facilities, transfer stations, and collection service to county facilities are provided
by the Sanitation Department. Subdivision construction project management and other engineering services
are provided by the Engineering Department. The General Services Department is responsible for custodial
services, back -tax and surplus property management, and contracted services.
Team Section Page 20
ENOINEERINO CORPORATION
,• MIcDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
MIKE LUECKER, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER - CIVIL & DRAINAGE
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineerinc
1994
University of
Missouri, Columbia
REGISTRATION
Professional Engii
- Civil
State of Arizona
State of Kansas
Team Section
Mike has more than 7 years of experience in the study and analysis of detention basins,
drainage systems, and developing HEC-1, HEC-2, and HEC-RAS computer models
for the numerous watercourses throughout Arizona and Kansas. Mike has also had design
experience in the preparation of roadway construction plans, incorporating data collection,
field surveys, utility coordination, horizontal alignment, water, sewer and storm drain
design and water and wastewater treatment facility design. Relevant experience includes:
SR 101L Pima Freeway from Pima to Scottsdale Roads; Scottsdale, AZ (HDR /AD07)
- As Design Engineer, provided on -site drainage services for the Pima to Scottsdale
Road section, which required extensive coordination between ADOT, the City of
Scottsdale, and the Corps of Engineers. Design of the on -site drainage system was
significantly impacted by the City of Scottsdale detention basin design (Desert Greenbelt).
Performed an in-depth review of the Desert Greenbelt Detention Basin report and plans
in order to complete their design in accordance to the established criteria. Major tasks
included hydrologic analyses, inlet design, storm drain analyses, and culvert analyses.
Premier prepared construction documents, quantity and cost estimates for the project.
North Campus Park Improvements; Casa Grande, AZ (City of Casa Grande) -
Resident Observer responsible for general contract administration, reviewing and
approving pay requests, shop drawings and change orders, observation of the work and
providing design clarifications/modifications as needed during construction. Design
Engineer for sanitary sewer located at this park. He prepared plans for approximately
800 LF of sanitary sewer.
Ed Hooper Park Softball Facility; (City of Casa Grande) - Design engineer for the
septic system of a 100-acre sports complex composed of four softball fields, and a
building which accommodates restrooms, concessions area and maintenance equipment
storage. He prepared plans and specifications for septic system with a design flowrate of
800 gallons per day.
Granite Mountain Development; Maricopa County, AZ (Fleet Fisher) - Performed
hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for several unnamed washes in Maricopa County. The
project required design of over fifty culvert crossings, floodplain delineation, and
determination of finished floor elevations. Upon completion of the analysis, a drainage
report, quantity and cost estimates were prepared.
SR 89A; Cornville, AZ (Entranco /ADOT 97-83) - Major tasks consisted of hydrologic
analysis and design of 46 culvert crossings and performing hydraulic analysis for 38
culvert crossings, within the 9-mile project limits near Sedona. Upon completion of the
analysis, prepared the Initial and Final Drainage Report, discussing existing drainage
problems, identifying possible solutions and developing drainage improvements.
Page 21
ENOINE...N. CORPORATgN
vNiA�N yi
`<l McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
JONATHAN I. PEIFFER, AIA, NCARB
LEAD PROJECT ARCHITECT (ROBERTS/JONES)
EDUCATION
B.A., Architect, 1992
Ball State Universitl
B.S., Environmental
Design, 1992
Ball State Universiq
REGISTRATION
Architect
State of Arizona
NCARB Certificate
Team Section
Jonathan Peiffer, a principal with RobertslJones Associates, has been active with the firm
for nearly 10 years, starting as an intern. His work experience has ranged from public
works, religious facilities, custom homes and planning, to commercial facilities. In addi-
tion to his work experience with RobertslJones, Jonathan spent one year at Cella Barr
Associates working on construction administration and ADA improvements for ADOT
Rest Areas and the design of railroad themed details at McCormick Railroad Park. By
the nature of many of these design challenges, creative thought and a high level of com-
munication with the client has been required from project conception to project comple-
tion.
Jonathan enjoys many different responsibilities in the firm. In addition to design and man-
agement, he makes office technology decisions, photographs completed projects, and
has been instrumental in incorporating sustainable design practices into project specifica-
tions. All of these roles have contributed to a firm commitment of constant improvement
in providing the highest quality design services.
Public Works
• Apache Park, Scottsdale —Principal Architect
• Sunset Point Rest Area Accessible Restroom Building—ProjectArchitect
• Matazal Rest Area Construction Administration —With Cella Barr Associates
• ADA Rest Area Improvements — With Cella Barr Associates
• McCormick Railroad Park, Scottsdale — With Cella Barr Associates
Religious
• Gold Canyon United Methodist Church, Gold Canyon —PrincipalArchitect
• Esperanza Lutheran Church, Phoenix — Principal Architect
• Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church, Fountain Hills — ProjectArchitect
• Pinnacle Presbyterian Church, Scottsdale — Green Specifications Writer
Residential
Brownstone at Hyde Park, Tempe — Principal Architect
Norman Residence, Payson — ProjectArchitect
Braucher Residence, Scottsdale — Project Manager
McQuillan Residence, Scottsdale — Project Manager
Historic Preservation
I• Coronado Neighborhood Heritage Grant - Principal Architect
• Laird & Dines Building, Tempe — Design Team Member
Page 22
ENOINEERINO CORPORATION
DESIGN EXCELLENCE is our focus
Roberts I Jones Associates, Inc., since its inception in 1983, has consistently
created award winning projects based on the philosophy of fully ad-
dressing the client's needs in a site sensitive approach while maintaining
he highest ideals of architectural design. We are dedicated to excel-
lence in our practice of architecture by contributing to the building of a
humane, and environmentally conscious setting.
the TEAM APPROACH to design
Our firm fully embraces and practices a team approach to design.
Working closely with all members of the team we are adept at assisting
with the continual decision -making process of design by way of team
consensus, and maintaining a consistent focus on our client's needs and
project goals.
SUSTAINABILITY is integral to our design process
As stewards of the environment, our team firmly believes that we should
do as much as is practically possible to preserve our environment. We
look at every project with the goal of shifting building practices toward
sustainable approaches that conserve not only energy, water and other
natural resources, but also preserving the environment and promoting a
quality of life that is enduring over time.
a high level of TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
The use of appropriate technology is an important component in how
we produce our work. All members of our firm utilize the latest technolo-
gies available to provide maximum flexibility and speed in exploring
alternate design solutions for our clients. We consistently produce designs
that are completed on time and yield projects that are within the con-
struction budget.
our FIRM HISTORY
Jim Roberts has been practicing architecture since 1974 when Jim and his
former partner David Jones started their architectural careers with
George Christensen. After a three year period as partners with George,
Jim and Dave created the firm of in Roberts l Jones Associates. In August
of 1993, David left Roberts l Jones to return .to his home in South Dakota.
In 1999 Ray Eynon, Jonathan Peiffer and Troy Vincent were made share-
holders of the firm.
Roberts l Jones Associates has grown to include a staff of ten highly
qualified individuals and enjoys a reputation of a highly creative and
ward -winning design team. Presently, the concept of a team ap-
proach to design, developed over the past several years, continues to
provide our clients with a high degree of personal service while offering
the combined talents of the design team to each project.
AAA
RaCMbIJonM AHa1.Ya1M, M1C.
braucher residence
desert mountain
scottsdale, arizona
:4&
A linear plan was developed that followed the
contours of the site to minimize cut and fill while
acheiving the goal of separating the internal
functions of the residence. Over 2000 survey
points were taken to properly fit the patio and
pool into the existing boulders along an active
wash. The completed residence successful
acheived the owner's goal for a unique desert
design that relates to its site.
Completion Date: 1995
This private residence, located in the desert mountain
development of Scottsdale, presented a challenging
design problem to fit the 3500 residence and outdoor patio
areas on a site with several natural features. The plan of
the residence was based upon minimum impact to the
existing site, working with prominent views, and preserving
natural site amenities in place.
•
RUDMSIJonw M�otlaln, Int.
Iloyd residence
desert mountain
scottsdale, arizona
Boulders on site located in the interior portion of the
residence were made interior features and transi-
tional peices between the living room and dining
room and to the exterior.
�,dverall, the residence is a proportioned blending of
natural and human made materials that makes this
structure a part of its desert surroundings.
The Lloyd Residence is located at the base of
Rose Quartz in the subdivsion named after this
unique site feature of Desert Mountain. Devel-
opment of this hillside residence presented
several design challeges that were overcome
through the design process. Existing promi-
nent landscape and boulders were preserved
in place while the residence took full advan-
tage of the prominent views to the south and
the north.
Completed in 2000, this residence continues
the tradition of desert sensitive design that has
been a hallmark of the firm since its inception.
AAA
RaO�rpiJanw /usotlMa, Inc.
pinnacle presbyterian church - phase I
scottsdale, arizona
Nir:ars ago, Roberts I Jones had the opportunity
to st this growing congregation in developing its
initial master plan. The first phase of the project
consisted of a chapel and the first classroom wing.
The 300 seat chapel actually functioned as the
Sanctuary until December of 2001 when the final
phase of the master plan was completed.
Located on a 20 acre desert site in North
Scottsdale, this first phases of the project took a
sensitive approach to the context and full advan-
tage of the natural features of the site including
views, native plant materials and the existing
washes. This initial phase set in motion a standard
of design and integration to the site which ulti-
mately resulted, through five phases, in a beautiful,
sustainable campus for its users.
Client Contact: Dr. Larry Corbet, Pastor
Pinnacle Presbyterian
25150 North Pima Road
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
480.585.9448
Completion Date: 1993
AA •
MaCwUlJanw bwdMw, Me.
Experience �
'i�` :ti � !.�.• {do-^ 4 .{, i t �'� •�I� ��
iL
lo
��� � t � F. ,err►-•r-„
_ ,�zv- ,. ter. _ - r �?�t ` ' •.a � _:: kr` �' � �. �T}� •``, ��•�
Aw
c iJ `:1 FAT ai".
1
rf
t � t
Z . _. t.,.r. � .. -�'1. .. ,_ �. �t'i-(i: ♦ l� 3 � ��' � ;Yf' Y ✓r�'r fi r. � � �.i y � �' Jo-.q;,:.'
•+� R ' '.l f• r : i♦ Yc. �1 v �s�s, hit " i � fT �i L '.l�'`r y• '"..•k„.. ♦.. to%
. `.j1 j�'�� ,�6,',•* �lKj.'Gt _ ' 4'L'a1r' F�. c��,v. Y rrs '�` .� r.i'.
it e ' r* :. �r'S} JWvC or
A•.fit.*[ r..L�" J r� .. - A� ,t.2,+•/�yyY��C�Jy,?s ,va c 'j`(`�1t- .�.
� Ys �.i'Y` '.� r ` `� / . �� }� M �ar .w J> �r'r.ly';�f�'' �F� �J�� •i • � . <�, Y < : ��, ''` 1 n 4}�p� 's
- f ..'i:. �✓ ,0' ; , , Y�_ � i ., f ♦, t� f . A.�- • ♦ry r .+,�,�s r r rl � !'F P` i✓a ,' .. r ';
,;; t� .r�Li.' � `i_/'��/J `Yv '. � a C�a''`t ' 1. ,t�," ///J(( i yyy�u,�,,{ry .: ` sM±: •, t � sY r � v i s a� ..
t,• 1, �� r i ..f 'i:r y..�^'� -*•� I� � .;�. `� i�� • y /.`' T�- '�' t♦ _ •<� ly �. Y `IG�-� ( rig'. 'A;• i)\ �!
'�• 1Y;� '`:Irt •� '�•=^; fit: �7t � •>, �:
4 �► 'RY i � i / •7. TAF ':i 1 �_✓.. tlrS Ytr'� � -� 'f n
+? M ...5 YZ.: � y �. , ti; ' �•. � � . p 'sy�' w i�� t��; ptir Y/ '. 7/ 2:- r ;;i •.`. � �4 "��
,� ' r. �:. .r �) ' � , j .fib ,, �! 3 �s3,; •t��./ j r r SY' ,r. ♦ 1• ���J
I: l� 1 y� r. i- �r��t- "*�'^'�'��� '��o- �^}: s t'� ,fir, / srj ►i `' i'IC'.i'.a
...
,r.
.N yi
°�NIMMcDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r S TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE APE PLAN
A.s All
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
The Premier Team is skilled in planning and
conservation techniques for desert open space and
contextual project theming for projects thoughtfully
integrated into the Sonoran Desert environment. The
following are a few of the successful projects
completed by our Team, which are most relevant to
this Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan project.
These projects have been completed on time and
within budget.
Project: Rio Salado Environmental
Restoration
Client: Corp of Engineers / City of Phoenix
Contact: Walt Khsler
Phone: (602) 534-2160
Construction Cost: $88 Million
Dates of Service: 2001 - 2005
Relevant Features: Trails, Trailheads, Parking,
Restroom Building, & Environmental Restoration
This five -mile project included field investigations, the
preparation of a Design Documentation Report
(DDR) and Final Design Material consisting of
contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and
design analysis. The above design material shall be
prepared with sound engineering and environmental
considerations, engineering criteria (federal, state and
local), USACE policy, applicable environmental
regulations for the State of Arizona regarding
development of landfill sites and NPDES permitting
requirements applicable to the discharge of
groundwater to the salt river.
Premier is responsible for the Landscape
Architectural planning, design and implementation. -
These services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands,
Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks and
Aesthetic treatments for all facilities.
Project: TerramarPark
Client: City of Peoria
Contact: Kirk Haines
Phone: (623) 773-7120
Construction Cost: $2 Million
Dates of Service: 2001 - 2004
Relevant Features: Trailhead, Restroom, Desert
Preservation, Parking, Master Plan, & Public
Participation
Terramar Park is
a 25-acre parcel
of land nestled in
the far northwest
valley within the
City of Peoria.
The site was selected by the City of Peoria for
development into a neighborhood park for the
northwest valley residence of this fast growing
metropolitan area. The site is very unique for an urban
municipal park in that the site backs up to the native
and undeveloped New River corridor and is
composed ofnative undisturbed desertwith the unique
character of the Sonoran Desert and the site has
several significant native wash corridors that traverse
the site adding to the topographic and plant material
diversity of the site. Premier was hired to consult with
the neighborhood and the City of Peoria staff in the
master planning of this desert park site. This effort
included extensive public involvement with four public
meetings attended on average at each meeting by over
100 citizens and the use of a general park survey to
gather the pulse of the surrounding neighborhood. The
result of this extensive input process is a park plan
that is a balance of turf and open space, basketball
courts, an urban skate park elements, extensive trail
system, parking for up to 50 cars and a restroom.
These elements were all designed to blend into the
site and are all encompassed and wrapped around
and through a preserved and enhance desert
ecosystem including the protection and use of the
native washes as significant features of the parks
development.
Experience Section
Page 1
`W
ni_,o
MISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
N��
Project: Tempe Butte Trail Improvements
(Individual Experience of Dean Chambers)
Client: City of Tempe
Contact: Jim Bond
Phone: (480) 350-8897
Construction Cost: $250,000
site. Park features will include
the historic core, Native
American garden,
conservatory/ amphitheater,
community linkages, and the
Phoenix Green, promontory and neighborhood park.
Dates of Service: 1990
Relevant Features: Trail, Trailhead, Overlook,
Desert Preservation, Native Materials, & Master
Plan Design Guide
Project Landscape Architect
responsible for the design of the
trails system for Tempe Butte
including construction drawings for
phase one implementation. Trail
alignments followed existing scars
to minimize visual/grading impacts
on the fragile vegetative cover. Guidelines developed
for Papago Park were followed in developing seating
areas, trail markers and trail furnishings (benches,
walls, trash receptacles and signage). The lower butte
trail was designed for the physically handicapped with
upslope trail beds offering more challenge for
experienced hikers. Emphasis was placed on future
expansion of trails within Papago Park to respond to
future developments along the Rio Salado and
downtown Tempe along Mill Avenue. Trail alignments
addressed critical areas of drainage, erosion, visual
impact and subsequent revegetation of disturbed
areas of the butte.
Project: Steele Indian School Park
(Individual Experience of Dean Chambers)
Client: City of Phoenix
Contact: Jim Barke
Phone: (602) 534-1870
Construction Cost: $14 Million
Dates of Service: 1996 - 2001
Relevant Features: Trailhead, Trails, Desert
Restoration, Restrooms, Parking, Interpretive
Signage/Exhibits, & Native Materials
Project Manager for a 75-acre park that will be a
redevelopment of a historic Phoenix Indian School
Project: Consolidated Canal Trail
(Individual Experience of Dean Chambers)
Client: City of Chandler
Contact: Dave McDowell
Phone: (480 0 786-2786
Construction Cost: $6.8 Million
Dates of Service: 1998
Relevant Features: Trails, Trailhead, & Master Plan
Project Manager responsible for
the preparation of the feasibility
study determining the potential
recreation and transit uses along
the canal. The study defines the
parameters for the project,
including goals, issues,
constraints, ideas and
improvements. Some of the
improvements include trailheads, interpretive centers,
multi -use ttmK signage, and lighting, drinking fountains
and emergency call box.
Project: Scottsdale Multi -Use Trails Master
Plan
(Individual Experience of Dean Chambers)
Client: City of Scottsdale
Contact: Scott Hameilton
Phone: (480) 312-7722
Construction Cost: N/A
Dates of Service: 2001 - 2002
Relevant Features: Trails, Trailhead, & Public
Participation
Dean Chambers is part of a Team providing planning
and public involvement services for a comprehensive
plan on Scottsdale's unpaved, multi -use trails. This
Team oversees a multi -disciplinary team of landscape
architects, planners, equestrian specialist and public
Experience Section
Page 2
ENGINEERING GORPORATI
C�,:,_)
N COMMISSION
CAPE PLAN
involvement specialist whose purpose is to update
the City's system of over 300+ miles of trails, study
the feasibility of implementing a new system of
neighborhood trails and establish priorities for future
acquisition, development and management. The
project has identified a vision, themes and goals which
promote the linkage of trails to other non -vehicular
modes, thereby stressing both recreation and
transportation. The Team will apply and modify, as
necessary, the City's existing Trails Standards and
Project: Scottsdale Desert Parks Design
Guidelines
(Individual Experience of Dean Chambers)
Client: City of Scottsdale
Contact: Gary Myer
Phone: (480) 312-7722
Construction Cost: N/A
Dates of Service: 2000
Relevant Features: Trails, Trailhead, Master Plan,
& Desert Integrated Design
Policies and will identify signature trails that will
enhance Scottsdale's economy, culture and quality
of life. An extensive public involvement process
includes focus groups, a statistical survey, a website,
newsletters, a Charrette, open houses and
presentations before the City's Parks & Recreation,
Transportation, Preserve and Planning Commissions
and the City Council.
Project: Cave Creek Regional Recreation
Area
(Individual Experience of Dean Chambers)
Client: Maricopa County Parks Dept.
Contact: Bill VanAnsdal
Phone: (602)503-8675
Construction Cost: $3.5 Million
Dates of Service: 1990 - 1996
Relevant Features: Trails, Trailheads, Parking,
Signage, Restrooms, Desert Restoration/
Preservation, &
Native Materials
Dean served as Project
Planner/Landscapew
Architect for the master
plan development and
construction document preparation ofthis 2,500-acre
regional desert park. The park is located in a
mountainous desert setting and preservation of the
natural features and wildlife was a primary concern.
Site analysis of this desert mountain park included
research into the vegetation, drainage and wildlife
patterns, evaluation of archaeology found on the site
and programming user needs.
Dean created, in conjunction with the City of
Scottsdale, the standards and objectives through
which parks are to be created in order to capitalize
upon the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert and
meet the needs of the growing community. The
guidelines are intended to assist in the evaluation of
potential park sites and provide guidance in the
development of future facilities.
Project: Tumbleweed Community Park
Client: City of Chandler
Contact: Aaron Woodward
Phone: (480) 782-2754
Construction Cost: $4,000,000
Dates of Service: 6/01- Current
Relevant Features: Amphitheater Area, Extensive
Trail System, Restrooms, Parking Lot, & Utility
Extensions
Premier provided the master planning design and
development of construction documents for the Phase
III portion of this community park. The improvements
include the development of an open stage/
amphitheaters area that will accommodate the City's
Ostrich festival, which is the City's largest organized
event drawing hundreds of thousands of visitors each
year. The park is also being designed to serve as a
regional park with picnicking, restrooms, extensive
trail system, historic farm recreations, and a future
train museum. Premier is also incorporating parking
lot, utility extensions and drainage improvements to
this regional and community park.
Experience Section Page 3 MT .
JvtiTA1.Y y�!
��f MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r ." TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
Project: Peart Park
Client: City of Casa Grande
Contact: JerrySullivan
Phone: (520) 421-8677
Construction Cost: $1,500,000
Dates of Service: 2001
Relevant Features: Amphitheater Area, Extensive
Trail System, Restrooms, & Preservation of
Landscape
Premier provided master
planning in cooperation
with the community of an i
existing historic 15-acre j
4 ,
ark. The improvements
P
included adding a space
for social and civic events
a small stage/ '.
amphitheater, extensive
trail system, restroom
facilities, and linkages to the library and City Hall.
The existing flood irrigation system was to remain and
designed to accommodate the changes being
proposed, and to incorporate a spray irrigation system
(W in areas that would no longer be served by the flood
irrigation. Preservation of the large eucalyptus trees
that inhabit the park was one of the highest priorities.
Project: Recker & Thomas Roads
Community Park
Client: City of Mesa
Contact: Viesturs (Vic) Kalva
Phone: (480) 644-2508
Construction Cost: $12,000,000
Dates of Services: 6/99 — 2/00
Relevant Features: Roadway Design, Multi -Use
Trail System, Restrooms, & Parking Lots
Premier provided master planning services for this
new 140-acre community recreational complex. The
planned improvements included four lighted and
fenced youth baseball fields, restroom/concession
facility, large tot lot/adventure play ground area, new
entry, new maintenance building, major road
circulation patterns, extensive pedestrian multi -use
trails and several new parking lots. The master plan
also includes the layout for three championship soccer
fields, associated restroom/concessions buildings, and
parking and pedestrian circulation within that area of
the park. The park included community park aspects
that included volleyball, basketball, skate park, and
associated 300-car parking lot. This site included
room for expansion into a community center complex
that would include a multi -generational facility, gym,
classrooms, weight room, and possibly an aquatic
center. The park is awaiting voter approval for future
development.
Project: New River Kiwanis Park
Client: Maricopa County Parks Dept.
Contact: Ken Mouw
Phone: (602) 506-4739
Construction Cost: $18,000,000 (estimated)
Dates of Services: 6/00 —11 /00
Relevant Features: Hill Side Topography,
Amphitheater Area, Extensive Trail System, &
Retroom
Premier provided master
planning services for this
80-acre regional park in
New River, Arizona. The
park, which sits on
beautifully lush hillside
topography, is part of the
Maricopa County Parks
System. The master plan
included approximately
$18 million of site
amenities and a community
center complex, which
includes a multi -
generational facility, kitchen, senior center, library,
gymnasium, classrooms, weight room, family aquatic
center, and a 400-person hillside amphitheater. The
park design also included separate areas for both a
professional and therapeutic rodeo arena with
improved covered spectator seating, a rodeo village
center, little league baseball facilities, large corporate
and individual hillside picnic ramadas, extensive trail
network, restroom buildings, overnight RV camping
zone, equestrian staging nodes, and tent camping
areas.
Experience Section Page 4 . .
ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Potentia
Solutions
� � w
f
-�• > _ e._ Y"�y yY+"y }a ,_ � I a ,r �',,,L�ii �°�,y, r , � \, � 1 � t .,r ::i, a �f.i":�'r:, � �1%
r ��;: �,r.�,..•, xLL-I �„ �,°',y�,',�-.- :. rr -r �,'�:-4 '�.c .� �� r ; r'� . ♦ ,-. ��1t +. _(�d� M!''�SL�.`:�' �- �,j r Y��..
'y :''z'�c-•+, .t'�, Yu$�..a,,y`-„ : y i>xt .w .8 • y' e•r"�,ir ,�"i1 `i dim.'
is'`�•• >ti a � 'r'1"}5 ts^'7� R" �,. iI' pyy�� � t�
+x
�. t� .. Kam•, �� �...y S'"S`•i bs ' •• f,i"�' '� � �� S'�•�a _ ' iNZ
ira �-► r _ iF 5'•'t '� �.. a ��,v :t l • i s r �F � P�* rp,-�, _t
'ti� t ::� � 'ter ,r•"F,-d4s ♦ rs . •� ice' ; �tr� J:��g �geyr � �.�'2S�i'ir''�".' .ia!�
-AA-a ?r
. �.. :,� i�i lw� r h � 4�'' a y _.* Sag.•• Y�a{,'�1.
0.
RJ � ` _���. '-n..�1� S K ♦ '`1iiL A tj •.,; r��� ,;.'1"rv:- - .� .� f� �.. ,,,1 � •'
•4. ' � � � y 1 � -
I�Ny"�a yq:F ,'� rt� 1�Wi i }_'r Y� ♦ 1 ✓r �1= ` ><�� L"IR w,�'�'��i/�il'�`� .� �
y ,•�.r..� �� , * ., eC'^'T,� •• ,ems r ac• +( 4. y'pra Iff' ^,5. ~ .•�� • : - ti',
AVA
1, i -.
,} ~iyti �y .. ' '•� .r S P•`•ti •� ''t•�Y «� � y�,`�°'"7J�t�„ �'4 '`�`� �.�a� •',,.rS A � A�'!� ..'i�M ,�'.
,.Z �6p,. ,� � i y- ,off ;� � `. !" '� ` ^'++c '�� \ �•
�' �, r •-1, �'' � 4 J��� J ; .�7�r R • 'r "�i�".�"r.'�•3rt': <;r? �,�r , t 1 ,�� d, y� i_
•r �'� AGE.,. - J � ti ! y { � ��.-Ty.w �"�r.� s\ �a i `� `� Inc fiI � � 'h� ya � .
' t, f ?�' M1+` .!���; � t to � .P � �� � t .., � M . • • tir• � r 14� . 'r . � •'�
a `>
yp� RR��t4l 1�,f' •I ,
'ice •�J ( �:,•t _ ,'�� � d ws���� ♦ , e t�pv�t�3F .`.�
'!F( 1 11 / 1jl ( � ��/y��J�', a'p c �' • 1 r}`Nal \
��C'l.. .1�YI :�•i •7 Y I�4 a( .\, rc.. i i. ,. :�TF .F�f _ _. a•�'.!��•}[•.1_'.._ _ - __ i. L/t1Y.r'_� �.
11
F
R� ktfkv lik
Ilk"Ag odd
Exit
Set i�tif&
*rA" Spa
ces,
LW
A'A"o.W Into Saddle4M Screened by Hills,
rade
.,pnd Adsbc Ston4 Wills (Ruint fjlcby
Fully A&*1:96y t-im " J. ",
1p -ow
v / fj I
8tfS'PaNi)i;7ov&&v;
-.j
r.
X0 4R"
-14
NL
9b
_!r
-4
Y14
u
r me re "e
t-�
��t �'. _ ..._. = ; r. r� `ice i��'�t'�'1 :. dt`!S�
4AA
� i 11 .. ow;ftirkir4a .4.
0
4 Hill
4—
Ruld ww) i
W ik
vo
A" n
U
-- 1 3 . 4rr14
-r f— . , I . C , I
* ! ' t
eX71
J At
ierFf. �.v 7"
' 10
At
-Z
aT�N y�
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
1%WW
14
DESIGN IDEAS
Site
• Capture and emphasize natural viewpoints.
Ideas: 360 degree overlook, view frame wall, -
siting of overlook/view points, road alignment "
• Shade pedestrian access points
• Shade seating/picnic area
• Earth integrated buildings, entry markers, walls,
ramadas
• Low profile and shielded lighting to reduce view
from off -site i
• Provide interpretive materials at overlook
• Desert ethic stories etched into materials
• Give meaning to facility location. Ideas: tell a story, create look of an ancient native ruins, facility
becomes part of the draw, celebrate the desert
Materials
• Buildings, walls, roofs to be of native materials
and colors blending with the natural desert
m
environment. Ideas: native stone, rammed earth,
gabion baskets/native rock, rusticated stained
concrete, rust patina metal, etc.
• Utilize native and dark colors to reduce glare
and visual impact
• Scale and mass materials to surrounding
environment
• Native materials for functional uses. Ideas: stone bollards,
stone cairns or trail markers, etched stone/concrete signage,
stacked stone walls, specimen plant as sculpture
• Use alternative paving materials for roads, emergency access
and trails rusticated stained concrete, "eco" block, stabilized
J
decomposed granite, earth-crete, exposed aggregate
Building
• Set building and ramada into hillside to reduce mass and visual impact
• Reduce building mass by breaking horizontal and vertical planes
• Site building and road on existing disturbed areas
• Orient/site building with environment as driving program factor
Grading
• Split road section to reduce cut/fill requirements and visual impact
• Utilize split and varied road profile to reduce impacts
Potential Solutions
Page 2
M
err ux y�
<<� MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r " TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
• Lower parking lot and road where possible to reduce visual imp
• Minimize parking areas into smaller pods for reduction in grad.
• Provide natural surface/textural retaining walls in cut/fill areas
• Maximum retaining wall height not to exceed 4 feet to reduce
visual impact
• Provide as many accessible access points, trails, parking to
enhance user experience
• Create water -harvesting areas to collect water from
impervious surfaces and utilize for vegetative supplemental
water
• Stain cuts with environmentally sensitive materials to reduce
visual impact
Vegetation
• Use native materials indigenous to site
• Minimize areas of construction and grading
disturbance to maintain existing vegetation
• Utilize native seed mix methods for revegetation to
reduce or eliminate need for irrigation system
• Interpretive and educational opportunities with
native plant specimens
lar WaIIJPl-tinge Entry Drive Put Si
gn
FT
El
Potential Solutions Page 3
ENGINEERING CORPORATION
e
Fee
Estimate
1
,a 5•. � art.:• �� �� a ��` � _
c
h J "
-� ohs •��� rri�' ..3,.� �T
AI
��1�f ,�f 3'i � ;.r f , A-• �tt'L1�•n ,sue / � f, s 1;/,. .' . 1 •�� �'_. .. K L -r�
_`�,t � �`r� .�_4 ` � ,. 1 •,� •"� � � r, ? _I .�, �,f �w ` -'s •y J` �w *.r �• t.�'ov
lot `� ,,,,tQ ' 3SRSf' - +'it` • •' It t .! �'� •.!� + .k �:c•.
�y a • � 'ky � r � td . � � 1
j law
Oki
�r � _��` �`., � .� •` r FYI L``I � �� h
J n 1
, ¢ S .�'�}�'' • . � �� 1 •�3� t • ,i ,� << �/r, / � 4+i14x4� t'/„�. a " � �,S ,� � . 1 t 1�\ � . � Z..a1l
ja r `S �` �, �.. 'wv I i ; _ fi •r S. >• `r? q'd -r. .` + ,'`{�:,� .r't N011 It
;� '��4 �• � �► 4_ t', .,�,r •_.,• � �- fay. �• t♦ ,.
ZA
t
.. ' +.�.. ti h- .K {-;�" ij' f �. 1. •� � �. �'"r-')CEN' �i'� �'t .
� � ^� I E � ..ta►' l �� ; r, � , i^ `y ' � a+ n '• AJ i`'-�u;"rC .71d1� ' t' .,t � \ i�
'� 1 ` e /`r• ♦ dyf ,f '�, '� , .1 ✓ - •:�,�• t%� �' �, " r fi�� „GIs, r u, rD
{,�'• t, 'i 4`'i rS�•`, , ,� ;���(« ' '' to
t OF
1 - . +1., � �+ �I'�•4+• i t j ,ys✓�-'•xi�� � "�t�.' ,. j • �wt�;:c.�• `-- +�+.�� �J
��•?• •``�1��f 1,14���"l{ i+'S� t�M v 'f �.y1`� •:a ~i!^-f`?p, '�' r}
a� � s•+"� ,, �4e' . ' , •- *ram"'.h', �D
Pq
f. .
E
N•..
j NTAINy�
',• MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION
r5 TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
�rM AnaN
FEE ESTIMATE
No. Description of Tasks:
1.0 Inventory & Analysis
1.1 Project Brefing
1.2 Data Gathering Review
1.3 Site Inventory Existing Conditions
1.4 Site Analysis/Opportunities & Constraints
1.5 Prong Session
Task 1.0 Sub -Total
2.0 Develop Plan Alternatives
2.1 Generate Alternative Concepts
2.2 Work Session w/ Staff/Preservation Commission
2.3 Cost Analysis
2.4 Test Alternatives
2.5 Work Session w/ StafllPreservation Commission
Task 2.0 Sub -Total
3.0 Preliminary Master Plan
3.1 Refine Selected Alternative
3.2 Prepare Preliminary Plan
3.3 Cost Estimate
Present Preliminary Master Plan & Cost to
3.4 StafllPreservation Commission
Task 3.0 Sub -Total
$ 2,500 to
$ 3,500 to
$ 3,500 to
4.0 Final Master Plan
4.1 Final Master Plan
4.2 Comprehensive Presentations to Staf]VTown Council
Task 4.0 Sub -Total $ 3,000 to
5.0 Rough Grading Plan
5.1 Rough Grading Plan
Task 5.0 Sub -Total $ 2,500 to
Total
�1 1
4200
4200
4500
3600
Sub -Total (Dollars) $ 15,000 $ 20,000
Estimated Expenses: Printing. Milage $ 250 to 1000
Total S 15,250 to $ 21,000
Fee Estimate Page 1
ENOINEERINO CORPORATION
August 15, 2002
Interofice Memo
To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
From: CASSIE HANSEN, DIRECTOR OF ADMINIST ION
Date: 8/ 15/ 2002
Re: COUNCIL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS
Staff has been requested to prepare some information on past council expense reimbursements to assist with the
agenda item regarding constituent services that appears on the 8/15/02 agenda. The preliminary request was for
reimbursements made to individual council members for the last four years including names, dates, purpose and
amounts. Reimbursement checks are paid to individuals from the general ledger as opposed to accounts payable
and are done manually. Detailed information is not available from the computer entry and can only be found by
pulling actual requisitions and receipts. Staff pulled this detailed information on reimbursements that were made
directly to council members and charged to the Mayor Council budget. These reimbursements can be found on the
Mayor and Council Expense Reimbursements June 1998 — June 2002 report, attached.
Additional information was requested to include funds expended from the Administration Department as well as the
Mayor Council budget. It was to also include funds not necessarily reimbursed to individual council members, but
funds expended to vendors on behalf of council members, i.e. airfare. To provide the most information in an
�ditious manner, staff has run and attached ledger reports for both the Administration and Mayor Council
kugets under account code 6548 Travel. This is the account that covers expenses including actual travel costs,
mileage reimbursement, business meals, lodging, etc. It would be very time consuming for staff to pull all of the
requisitions and receipts for all the general ledger expenses in the Administration Department for the last four
years. Although not detailed, the ledger report provides the payee and an abbreviated transaction description.
Staff has tried to highlight those expenditures made on behalf of council members from the Administration budget.
A software conversion took place during fiscal year 1998/99. The ledger reports from that year are only available
in the old format and show no detail, thus, they have not been included.
Budget summary sheets have been included for the Mayor Council budgets for the last three fiscal years. They
show what was budgeted and what was actually spent for line items such as Travel. Each Summary Report page
has the Expenditure Journal page attached for 6548 Travel. The YTD Actual on the Summary Report page should
match the sum of the General Ledger and Account Payable columns on the Expenditure Journal page.
Reimbursements to council members appear in the General Ledger column. Expenditures made to vendors on
behalf of council members appear in the Account Payable column.
Although the ledger reports do not contain the detail of the Expense Reimbursement report, they provide
information regarding both reimbursements made to council members from the Administration Department as well
as expenditures made on their behalf. If the Council would like detail on any specific expenditure, staff would be
happy to pull the historical documentation as required. The combined totals, including personal reimbursements
and payments to vendors from both the Administration and Mayor Council budget, are summarized below:
1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002
$1,111.88 $943.46 $2,390.21
Page 1 of 1
Mayor and Council Expense Reimbursements
June 1998 - June 2002
DATE
INDIVIDUAL
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Four books to be give to the Kasterlee (Sister
City) representative traveling with Mayor
11 /2/ 1999
Sharon Morgan
Otten.
$57.62
5/24/2000
Sharon Morgan
Frame for pictures in the Court entry.
$12.84
8/31 /2000
Sharon Morgan
Frames for the Kasterlee photos.
_ $304.50
Lunch at League conference. Breakfast
meeting with Randall Gnant and Vice Mayor
Sharon Hutcheson. Expenses for Sister Cities
9/13/00-10/3/00
Sharon Morgan
visit - hotel, meals and taxi.
$203.24
Lunch meetings regarding Plat 208 and lunch
10/ 19/00-11 / 14/00
Sharon Morgan
for Sister City guests.
$123.69
Lunch meeting regarding Mayor's Council for
3/ 1 /2001
Sharon Morgan
Economic Development.
$33.94
03/02/01-03/30/01
Susan Ralphe
Mileage reimbursement for MAG forum series.
$50.71
4/4/2001
Sharon Morgan
Breakfast with President Pattea.
$18.03
Flowers for Vice Mayor Wyman's 50th
Wedding anniversary presented at the Council
6/21/2001
Sharon Morgan
meeting.
$32.13
11 / 16/2001
Sharon Hutcheson
Dinner at League conference.
$24.96
National League conference reimbursement -
12/5/2001
Sharon Morgan
hotel, meals and taxi.
$1,040.14
1 / 14/2002
Susan Ralphe
Mileage to Luke AFB for elected officials event.
$40.51
Sister Cities lunch meeting and Chamber
2/6/02 & 2/25/02
Sharon Morgan
breakfast.
$189.66
Meeting with Vice Mayor John Kavanagh,
Sharon Hutcheson, and former Council
2/27/2002
Sharon Morgan
Member M. Wiggishoff.
$73.69
4/ 17/2002
Sharon Morgan
Sister City conference supplies and food.
$471.47
Framed pieces presented at the Alan
4/22/2002
Sharon Morgan
Cruikshank dinner.
$83.08
Meeting with the Scottsdale Police Chief -
5/31 /2002
Rick Melendez
lunch and mileage.
1 $79.30
k
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 -General Fund
050 - General and Administrative
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000
GL
Document
Effective
Function
Code
Name
Number
Transaction Descrip... General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
6548
Bank of America
113954
GILBERT COUNCI...
0.00
223.74
3/31/2000
10
6548
Bank of America
5113APR
MAYOR'S CUP
0.00
105.00
4/30/2000
10
6548
Bank of America
5113/JU...
TRAVEL EXPENSE
0.00
21.37
6/30/2000
10
6548
Basha's
1591640
FOOD/EXEC SESS...
0.00
29.47
6/29/2000
10
6548
Basha's
1591537
REFRESHMENTS
0.00
25.47
5/31/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
44566
EXPENSE REIMB...
60.45
0.00
4/1/2000
10
6548
Bev Bender
42364
Expenses
9.75
0.00
9/1/1999
10
6548
Bev Bender
43566
Mileage
82.55
0.00
1/4/2000
10
6548
Bev Bender
41836
Mileage Reimburse...
39.00
0.00
11/1/1999
10
6548
BEV BENDER
45093
MILEAGE/EXPEN...
65.50
0.00
6/1/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
45320
MILEAGE/EXPEN...
89.44
0.00
6/30/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
44823
MILEAGE/REFRE...
56.55
0.00
5/1/2000
10
6548
Bev Bender
42614
Reimbursement
80.86
0.00
10/l/1999
10
6548
BEV BENDER
43874
TRAVEL/EXPENS...
103.54
0.00
2/l/2000
10
6548
Cassie Hansen
43274
Mileage Reimburse...
23.40
0.00
12/1/1999
10
6548
Cassie Hansen
42578
Reimbursement LQo fv;-
235.24
0.00
10/l/1999
10
6548
Deb Feller
42612
Mileage
25.35
0.00
10/1/1999
10
6548
Debbie Feller
41848
Mileage
26.98
0.00
11/1/1999
10
6548
Don Thumith
42618
Mileage
14.43
0.00
10/1/1999
10
6548
Don Thumith
43565
Mileage
24.05
0.00
1/4/2000
10
6548
DON THUMITH
44834
MILEAGE
42.90
0.00
5/l/2000
10
548
ENTERPRISE REN...
D523767
Van Rental/League ...
0.00
75.24
9/20/1999
10
6548
FOUNTAIN HILLS...
5561
DELIVERY SERVI...
0.00
17.00
4/30/2000
10
6548
FOUNTAIN HILLS...
5704
DELIVERY SERVI...
0.00
31.00
5/31/2000
10
6548
Ftn Hills Chamber o...
43890
CHAMBER GALA
320.00
0.00
2/l/2000
10
6548
Jane E Robinson
42359
Mileage
5.53
0.00
9/1/1999
10
6548
JOAN DORAN
44588
TRAVEL REIMBU...
17.88
0.00
4/l/2000
10
6548
JOAN DORAN
44300
TRAVELMILEAGE
17.87
0.00
3/l/2000
10
6548
John Wyman
42579
Reimbursement
161.38
0.00
10/1/1999
10
6548
Judy Hertrich
42586
Mileage
9.43
0.00
10/1/1999
10
6548
Judy Hertrich
43568
Mileage
19.18
0.00
1/4/2000
10
6548
Judy Hertrich
41862
Mileage
9.10
0.00
11/1/1999
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
44824
MILEAGE REIMB...
34.29
0.00
5/l/2000
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
44261
REIMBURSEMENT
19.50
0.00
3/l/2000
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
43864
REIMBURSEMENT
23.34
0.00
2/l/2000
10
6548
Linda Lemmen
42360
Mileage/Expenses
56.78
0.00
9/1/1999
10
6548
MICHAEL CICCA...
44286
MILEAGE
18.85
0.00
3/l/2000
10
6548
MICHAEL CICCA...
44573
MILEAGE REIMB...
25.03
0.00
4/1/2000
10
6548
MICHAEL CICCA...
43298
MILEAGE REIMB...
21.13
0.00
12/1/1999
10
6548
MICHAEL CICCA...
44245
REIMBURSEMEN...
55.51
0.00
3/l/2000
10
6548
PAUL NORDIN
45107
EXPENSE REIMB...
22.82
0.00
6/l/2000
10
6548
Paul Nordin
42349
Travel Reimbursem...
55.88
0.00
9/1/1999
10
6548
Pen Mower
42621
Reimbursement
64.93
0.00
10/1/1999
10
6548
PEN MOWER
43900
REIMBURSEMEN...
70.57
0.00
2/l/2000
10
6548
POMAS RISTORA...
608700
Accounts Payable I...
0.00
53.45
1/30/2000
10
6548
SUE DEGLER
44821
REFRESHMENTS/...
6.22
0.00
5/l/2000
10
6548
SUSAN DEGLER
45099
MILEAGE
16.57
0.00
6/l/2000
10
6548 SUSAN GRIGGS 45094 MILEAGE 13.33 0.00 6/l/2000 10
3548 Susan Griggs 42585 Mileage 12.35 0.00 10/1/1999 10
Date: 8114/02 10:41:21 AM Page. 1
GL
Code
6548
6548
6548
6548
6548
6548
6548
6548
6548
Total
6548
Name
Susan Griggs
SUSAN GRIGGS
SUSAN GRIGGS
Susan M Degler
Vendor:
Vendor:
Vendor:
Vendor:
Wallace B Hudson
Report Total
Date: 8/14/02 10:41:21 AM
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 - General Fund
050 - General and Administrative
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000
Document
Effective
Function
Number
Transaction Descrip... General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
41868
Mileage Reimburse...
13.66
0.00
11/1/1999
10
44574
MILEAGE REIMB...
8.13
0.00
4/1/2000
10
43887
MILEAGE REIMB...
13.98
0.00
2/l/2000
10
42366
Reimbursement
27.32
0.00
9/1/1999
10
42107
Mileage
39.97
0.00
7/31/1999
10
41886
Reimb. S.F. Legal C... 512.14
0.00
11/1/1999
10
41883
Reimburse Mileage ...
12.77
0.00
11/1/1999
10
41878
Reimburse Supplies...
39.00
0.00
11/1/1999
10
42580
Reimbursement
123.04
0.00
10/1/1999
10
2,847.47
581.74
16.r
Total 99999 - No Title
2,847.47
581.74
Total 999 - No Title
2,847.47
581.74
Total 050 - General and 2,947.47 581.74
Administrative
Total 01 - General Fund 2,847.47 581.74
2,847.47 581.74
Page: 2
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 - General Fund
050 - General and Administrative
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
kr,
From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001
GI,
Document
Effective
Function
Code
Name
Number
Transaction Descrip...
General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
6548
JV 10-00...
Corr Coding/Nordin...
(290.00)
0.00
10/31/2000
10
6548
CR0228-...
PN Travel Reimbur...
(354.00)
0.00
2/28/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
Credit card charges
0.00
169.62
11/16/2000
10
6548
Bank of America
46631
CREDIT CARD C...
44.52
0.00
12/1/2000
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
February charges
0.00
640.50
2/28/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
June charges
0.00
179.00
6/30/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
March charges
0.00
47.42
3/31/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
November charges
0.00
58.95
11/30/2000
10
6548
Basha's
1672216
Lunch for admin me...
0.00
35.67
11/30/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
45605
EXPENSE REIMB...
98.84
0.00
8/1/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
48007
EXPENSE REIMB...
45.29
0.00
5/1/2001
10
6548
BEV BENDER
45832
MILEAGE
37.05
0.00
9/1/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
46071
MILEAGE REIMB...
64.35
0.00
10/1/2000
10
6548
BEV BENDER
47176
MILEAGE REIMB...
85.15
0.00
2/1/2001
10
6548
BEV BENDER
48845
MILEAGE REIMB...
37.94
0.00
6/29/2001
10
6548
BEV BENDER
46114
REIMBURSEMEN...
37.05
0.00
10/10/2000
10
6548
CASSIE HANSEN
46637
EXPENSE REIMB...
96.01
0.00
12/1/2000
10
6548
CASSIE HANSEN
48565
EXPENSE REIMB...
16.21
0.00
6/1/2001
10
6548
CASSIE HANSEN
45820
MILEAGE
15.92
0.00
9/l/2000
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
47229
EXPENSE REIMB...
32.50
0.00
2/1/2001
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
47492
EXPENSE REIMB...
31.74
0.00
3/1/2001
10
548
CHARISSA VERD...
48825
MILEAGE
41.05
0.00
6/29/2001
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
45801
MILEAGE
10.08
0.00
9/l/2000
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
46639
MILEAGE EXPEN...
12.03
0.00
12/1/2000
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
45583
MILEAGE REIMB...
15.28
0.00
8/l/2000
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
46067
REIMBURSEMEN...
7.15
0.00
10/1/2000
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
46116
REIMBURSEMEN...
16.90
0.00
10/10/2000
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
46917
REIMBURSEMEN...
12.35
0.00
l/l/2001
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
47768
TRAVEL EXPENS...
15.53
0.00
4/1/2001
10
6548
Charissa Verdugo
46348
Travel expense reim...
41.28
0.00
11/1/2000
10
6548
CHARLES FLECK
47187
EXPENSE REIMB...
32.57
0.00
2/1/2001
10
6548
CHARLES FLECK
46640
MILEAGE EXPEN...
43.75
0.00
12/1/2000
10
6548
CHARLES FLECK
46918
REIMBURSEMEN...
59.02
0.00
l/l/2001
10
6548
CHARLIE FLECK
46115
REIMBURSEMEN...
40.52
0.00
10/10/2000
10
6548
Daybreak Travel
0048501
Air fare for confere ...
PO&II 0.00
290.00
9/30/2000
10
6548
JAMES WILLERS
48050
EXPENSE REIMB...
21.96
0.00
5/1/2001
10
6548
JOAN DORAN
48558
EXPENSE REIMB...
43.47
0.00
6/1/2001
10
6548
JOAN DORAN
48820
MILEAGE
21.74
0.00
6/29/2001
10
6548
JOAN MCINTOSH
47472
EXPENSE REIMB...
67.29
0.00
3/1/2001
10
6548
JOAN MCINTOSH
45598
TRAVEL REIMBU...
33.49
0.00
8/I/2000
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
45364
MILEAGE
50.25
0.00
7/3/2000
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
46929
TRAVEL EXPENS...
58.05
0.00
1/1/2001
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
47740
TRAVEL EXPENS...
29.24
0.00
4/1/2001
10
6548
JULIE GHETTI
48023
EXPENSE REIMB...
60.92
0.00
5/1/2001
10
6548
MICHAEL CICCA...
46659
MILEAGE EXPEN...
19.50
0.00
12/1/2000
10
6548
NANCY KNIHNIS...
48569
EXPENSE REIMB...
21.05
0.00
6/1/2001
10
6548
NANCY KNIHNIS...
48819
MILEAGE
21.05
0.00
6/29/2001
10
6548
PAUL L NORDIN
45833
EXPENSE REIMB...
14.44
0.00
9/1/2000
10
t i548
PAUL NORDIN
48578
EXPENSE REIMB...
32.87
0.00
6/1/2001
10
Date: 8/14/02 10:41:37 AM
Page. 1
i
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 -General Fund
050 - General and Administrative
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001
GL
Document
Effective
Function
Code
Name
Number
Transaction Descrip... General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
6548
PAUL NORDIN
48040
EXPENSE REIMB... 22.71
0.00
5/1/2001
10
6548
PAUL NORDIN
47214
EXPENSE REIMB... 26.08
0.00
2/1/2001
10
6548
PAUL NORDIN
47473
EXPENSE REIMB... 260.05
0.00
3/1/2001
10
6548
PAUL NORDIN
46933
LUNCH EXPENSE... 58.01
0.00
1/l/2001
10
6548
PAUL NORDIN
46052
REIMBURSEMEN... 78.59
0.00
10/1/2000
10
6548
PAUL NORDIN
46109
REIMBURSEMEN... 105.24
0.00
10/10/2000
10
6548
PETTY CASH
48833
PETTY CASH REI... 4.57
0.00
6/29/2001
10
6548
PETTY CASH
47474
REIMBURSE PET... 27.68
0.00
3/1/2001
10
6548
Petty Cash
46619
Reimburse Petty Cash 27.78
0.00
11/20/2000
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
46118
REIMBURSEMEN... 23.24
0.00
10/10/2000
10
6548
SUSAN DEGLER
48014
EXPENSE REIMB... 25.87
0.00
5/1/2001
10
6548
SUSAN DEGLER
47725
TRAVEL EXPENS... 30.49
0.00
4/1/2001
10
6548
SUSAN DEGLER
46939
TRAVEL EXPENS... 22.75
0.00
1/1/2001
10
6548
SUSAN GRIGGS
47195
EXPENSE REIMB... 24.84
0.00
2/1/2001
10
6548
SUSAN GRIGGS
46679
MILEAGE EXPEN... 22.75
0.00
12/1/2000
10
6548
SUSAN RALPHE
47483
EXPENSE REIMB... 71.57
0.00
3/1/2001
10
6548
THE CLUB AT CO...
110
Luncheon for East ... 0.00
555.82
9/30/2000
10
Total
1,673.62
1,976.98
6548
Total 99999 - No Title 1,673.62
1,976.98
Total 999 - No Title 1,673.62
1,976.98
Total 050 - General and 1,673.62 1,976.98
Administrative
Total 01 -General Fund 1,673.62 1,976.98
Report Total 1,673.62 1,976.98
Date: 8/14/02 10:41:37 AM
Page: 2
M
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
O1 - General Fund
050 - General and Administrative
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/2001 Through 6/30/2002
GL
Document
Effective
Function
Code
Name
Number
Transaction Descrip... General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
6548
Andy Odendahl
52054
Expense reimburse...
51.10
0.00
6/27/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0198366...
April charges
0.00
112.18
4/30/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223506...
August charges
0.00
37.42
8/31/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
December charges
0.00
69.29
12/31/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0198366...
February charges
0.00
75.24
2/28/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
February charges
0.00
83.37
2/28/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
January charges
0.00
78.08
1/31/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
July charges
0.00
50.81
7/31/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0198366...
June charges
0.00
31.67
6/30/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0198366...
March charges
0.00
171.59
3/31/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223506...
March charges
0.00
121.77
3/31/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
March charges
0.00
81.50
3/31/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0198369...
May charges
0.00
204.81
5/31/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
November charges
0.00
389.98
11/30/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
1022350...
October charges
0.00
34.34
10/31/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
October charges
0.00
41.93
10/31/2001
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
September charges
0.00
456.13
9/30/2001
10
6548
BEV BENDER
49119
EXPENSE REIMB...
19.32
0.00
8/1/2001
10
6548
BEV BENDER
51281
EXPENSE REIMB...
53.29
0.00
4/l/2002
10
6548
Bev Bender
52040
Expense reimburse...
76.65
0.00
6/27/2002
10
6548
BEV BENDER
51556
MILEAGE REIMB...
31.76
0.00
5/1/2002
10
548
BILL FARRELL
49337
EXPENSE REIMB...
32.50
0.00
9/1/2001
10
6548
CASSIE HANSEN
50489
EXPENSE REIMB...
161.42
0.00
l/1/2002
10
6548
CASSIE HANSEN
51829
EXPENSE REIMB...
58.55
0.00
6/l/2002
10
6548
CASSIE HANSEN
49344
EXPENSE REIMB...
62.84
0.00
9/1/2001
10
6548
CHARISSA VERD...
49909
EXPENSE REIMB...
42.78
0.00
11/l/2001
10
6548
JOAN MCINTOSH
50502
EXPENSE REIMB...
10.35
0.00
l/l/2002
10
6548
Joan McIntosh
48868
Seminar expenses re...
37.49
0.00
7/1/2001
10
6548
JOHN WYMAN
49910
EXPENSE REIMB...
57.67
0.00
11/1/2001
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
50491
EXPENSE REIMB...
32.43
0.00
1/l/2002
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
49880
EXPENSE REIMB...
32.09
0.00
11/1/2001
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
49342
EXPENSE REIMB...
71.42
0.00
9/1/2001
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
49588
EXPENSE REIMB...
18.98
0.00
10/1/2001
10
6548
JUDY HERTRICH
51832
EXPENSE REIMB...
48.57
0.00
6/1/2002
10
6548
Judy Hertrich
52044
Expense reimburse...
5.12
0.00
6/27/2002
10
6548
MIKE CICCARONE
49872
EXPENSE REIMB...
21.39
0.00
1 l/l/2001
10
6548
MIKE CICCARONE
49331
EXPENSE REIMB...
12.08
0.00
9/1/2001
10
6548
NANCY KNIHNIS...
50182
MILEAGE REIMB...
37.95
0.00
12/1/2001
10
6548
PETTY CASH
49896
PETTY CASH REI...
7.00
0.00
l l/l/2001
10
6548
PETTY CASH
51037
REIMBURSE PET...
17.54
0.00
3/1/2002
10
6548
ROY R. PEDERSON
51306
ACTING TOWN M...
24.36
0.00
4/l/2002
10
6548
ROY R. PEDERSON
52052
Expense reimburse...
33.05
0.00
6/27/2002
10
6548
ROY R. PEDERSON
51036
EXPENSE REIMB...
44.56
0.00
3/l/2002
10
6548
ROY R. PEDERSON
51846
TOWN MGR SER...
22.80
0.00
6/1/2002
10
6548
SUE STEIN
51589
EXPENSE REIMB...
100.89
0.00
5/1/2002
10
6548
SUSAN GRIGGS
51024
EXPENSE REIMB...
14.44
0.00
3/l/2002
10
6548
SUSAN STEIN
51041
EXPENSE REIMB...
39.50
0.00
3/l/2002
10
6548 Susan Stein 52059 Expense reimburse... 31.28 0.00 6/27/2002 10
i548 SUSAN STEIN 49901 EXPENSE REIMB... 30.71 0.00 1 l/1/2001 10
Date: 8/14102 10:40:58 AM Page: 1
GL
Code Name
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 - General Fund
050 - General and Administrative
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/l/2001 Through 6/30/2002
Document Effective Function
Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code
6548 WALLACE HUDS... 51295 EXPENSE RERAB... 135.23 0.00 4/1/2002 10
Total 1,477.11 2,040.11
6548
Total 99999 - No Title
Total 999 - No Title
Total 050 - General and
Administrative
Total 01 -General Fund
Report Total
k4..
Date: 8/14/02 10:40:58 AM
1,477.11
2,040.11
1,477.11
2,040.11
1,477.11
2,040.11
1,477.11
1,477.11
,5 -7 1
1) fldfl t t
2,040.11
Page:2
Account ...
Account Title
5200
Wages and Salaries
5201
Employer FICA Expense
5202
Unemployment Insurance Ex....
5207
Worker's Compensation Exp...
5915
Elections Expense
6501
Advertising/Signage
6503
Community Outreach Progra...
6520
Office Supplies
6548
Travel Expense
Total 999 - No Title
Total 99999 - No Title
Total 020 - Mayor and
Town Council
Total 01 - General Fund
Report Total
Town of Fountain Hills
Summary Expenditure Budget Report
01 -General Fund
020 - Mayor and Town Council
99999 - No Title
999 - No Title
From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000
Percent
Total
Budget
Current Period...
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
YTD Budget Vari...
Remaining
26,400.00
26,400.00
26,400.00
0.00
73.17%
2,019.60
2,019.60
2,300.00
280.40
74.14%
7.83
7.83
200.00
192.17
99.22%
207.68
207.68
100.00
(107.68)
70.75%
26,168.26
26,168.26
33,000.00
6,831.74
72.31%
13,092.43
13,092.43
8,500.00
(4,592.43)
55.62%
8,155.64
8,155.64
11,000.00
2,844.36
34.75%
4,439.52
4,439.52
3,500.00
(939.52)
57.72%
815.00
815.00
0.00
(815.00)
94.91%
81,305.96
81,305.96
85,000.00
3,694.04
69.99%
81,305.96
91,305.96
85,000.00
3,694.04
69.99%
81,305.96
81,305.96
85,000.00
3,694.04
69.99%
81,305.96
81,305.96
85,000.00
3,694.04
69.99%
81,305.96
91,305.96
85,000.00
3,694.04
84.99%
—ro a_ -k -I�ro v ck &1-tN 6 e 4 )) i l 1. S S-
Date: 8/14/02 10:41:44 AM Page: 1
GL
Code
6548
Total
6548
Name
Report Total
Bank of America
Date: 9/14/02 10:40:22 AM
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 - General Fund
020 - Mayor and Town Council
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000
Document Effective Function
Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code
5113/JU... KASTERLEE TICK... 0.00 815.00 6/30/2000 10
0.00 815.00
Total 99999 - No Title
Total 999 - No Title
Total 020 - Mayor and
Town Council
Total 01 -General Fund
0.00 815.00
0.00 815.00
0.00 815.00
0.00 815.00
0.00 815.00
Page: 1
Town of Fountain Hills
Summary Expenditure Budget Report
01 - General Fund
020 - Mayor and Town Council
99999 - No Title
999 - No Title
From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001
Percent
Total
Budget
Account ...
Account Title
Current Period...
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
YTD Budget Vari...
Remaining
5200
Wages and Salaries
35,200.00
35,200.00
36,000.00
800.00
51.11%
5201
Employer FICA Expense
2,692.80
2,692.80
2,755.00
62.20
51.13%
5202
Unemployment Insurance Ex...
121.95
121.95
400.00
278.05
84.76%
5207
Worker's Compensation Exp...
241.94
241.94
305.00
63.06
60.34%
5915
Elections Expense
7,845.44
7,845.44
25,500.00
17,654.56
87.24%
6501
Advertising/Signage
6,028.50
6,028.50
10,000.00
3,971.50
71.29%
6503
Community Outreach Progra...
300.00
300.00
1,000.00
700.00
80.00%
6505
Conferences
1,800.00
1,800.00
1,500.00
(300.00)
28.00%
6508
Dues & Publications
48.30
48.30
750.00
701.70
94.92%
6520
Office Supplies
2,549.28
2,549.28
3,500.00
950.72
63.58%
6531
Printing
613.32
613.32
0.00
(613.32)
(100.00%)
6548
Travel Expense
848.65
848.65
3,000.00
2,151.35
94.70%
Total 999 - No Title
58,290.18
58,290.18
84,710.00
26,419.82
69.22%
Total 99999 - No Title
58,290.18
58,290.18
84,710.00
26,419.82
69.22%
Total 020 - Mayor and
58,290.18
58,290.18
84,710.00
26,419.82
69.22%
Town Council
Total 01 -General Fund
58,290.18
58,290.18
84,710.00
26,419.82
69.22%
Report Total
58,290.18
58,290.18
84,710.00
26,419.82
84.61%
�o+ C, L --f—rdw (_k .bo4-\ ck e P -b 4 9 y 3- Y to
Daze: 9/14/02 10:41:33 AM
Page: 1
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 - General Fund
020 - Mayor and Town Council
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001
GL
Document
Effective
Function
Code
Name
Number
Transaction Descrip...
General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
6548
JV 12-00...
Corr Coding/Reimb...
123.69
0.00
12/15/2000
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
March charges
0.00
19.74
3/31/2001
10
6548
Daybreak Travel
45574
MAYOR SHARON...
349.96
0.00
8/l/2000
10
6548
FIREROCK COUN...
10171unch
Lunch w/ Rep. Mar...
0.00
49.34
9/30/2000
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
47752
EXPENSE REIMB...
33.94
0.00
4/l/2001
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
48038
EXPENSE REIMB...
18.03
0.00
5/1/2001
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
46118
REIMBURSEMEN...
203.24
0.00
10/10/2000
10
6548
SUSAN RALPHE
48042
EXPENSE REIMB...
50.71
0.00
5/1/2001
10
Total
779.57
69.08
6548
Total 99999 - No Title
779.57
69.08
Total 999 - No Title
779.57
69.08
Total 020 - Mayor and
779.57
69.08
Town Council
r
Total 01 - General Fund
779.57
69.08
Report Total
L
Date: 9/14/02 10:40:33 AM
779.57 69.08
Page: 1
Town of Fountain Hills
Summary Expenditure Budget Report
01 - General Fund
020 - Mayor and Town Council
99999 - No Title
999 - No Title
From 7/1/2001 Through 6/30/2002
Percent
Total
Budget
Account ...
Account Title
Current Period...
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
YTD Budget Vari...
Remaining
5200
Wages and Salaries
35,000.00
35,000.00
36,000.00
1,000.00
2.78%
5201
Employer FICA Expense
2,677.50
2,677.50
2,755.00
77.50
2.81 %
5202
Unemployment Insurance Ex...
127.32
127.32
400.00
272.68
68.17%
5207
Worker's Compensation Exp...
353.71
353.71
305.00
(48.71)
(15.97%)
5915
Elections Expense
36,201.45
36,201.45
36,000.00
(201.45)
(0.56%)
6501
Advertising/Signage
23,481.97
23,481.97
11,000.00
(12,481.97)
(113.47%)
6503
Community Outreach Progra...
0.00
0.00
500.00
500.00
100.00%
6505
Conferences
1,200.00
1,200.00
1,000.00
(200.00)
(20.00%)
6508
Dues & Publications
0.00
0.00
200.00
200.00
100.00%
6520
Office Supplies
957.18
957.18
3,500.00
2,542.82
72.65%
6531
Printing
113.09
113.09
0.00
(113.09)
(100.00%)
6548
Travel Expense
2,332.54
2,332.54
13,000.00
10,667.46
82.06%
Total 999 - No Title
102,444.76
102,444.76
104,660.00
2,215.24
2.12%
Total 99999 - No Title
102,444.76
102,444.76
104,660.00
2,215.24
2.12%
Total 020 - Mayor and
102,444.76
102,444.76
104,660.00
2,215.24
2.12%
Town Council
Total 01 - General Fund
102,444.76
102,444.76
104,660.00
2,215.24
2.12%
Report Total
102,444.76
102,444.76
104,660.00
2,215.24
51.06%
I
Date: 8/14/02 10:41:20 AM Page: 1
Town of Fountain Hills
Expenditure Journal
01 - General Fund
020 - Mayor and Town Council
999 - No Title
99999 - No Title
From 7/1/2001 Through 6/30/2002
GL
Document
Effective
Function
Code
Name
Number
Transaction Descrip...
General Ledge...
Account Paya...
Date
Code
6548
Bank of America
0223506...
June charges
0.00
58.58
6/30/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
June charges
0.00
42.28
6/30/2002
10
6548
Bank of America
0223511...
September charges
0.00
221.95
9/30/2001
10
6548
PHIL'S FELLING S...
051602c...
Dinner for 05/16/02...
0.00
90.00
6/30/2002
10
6548
Rick Melendez
52057
Expense reimburse...
79.30
0.00
6/27/2002
10
6548
SHARON HUTCH...
50180
EXPENSE REIMB...
24.96
0.00
12/1/2001
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
50504
EXPENSE REIMB...
1,040.14
0.00
l/l/2002
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
51031
EXPENSE REIMB...
189.66
0.00
3/1/2002
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
51302
EXPENSE REIMB...
73.69
0.00
4/l/2002
10
6548
SHARON MORGAN
51582
EXPENSE REIMB...
471.47
0.00
5/l/2002
10
6548
SUSAN RALPHE
50753
EXPENSE REIMB...
40.51
0.00
2/l/2002
10
Total
1,919.73
412.81
6548
Total 99999 - No Title
1,919.73
412.81
Total 999 - No Title
1,919.73
412.81
®
Total 020 - Mayor and
1,919.73
412.81
Town Council
Total 01 -General Fund
1,919.73
412.81
Report Total
1,919.73
412.81
kw
Date: 8/14/02 10:40:46 AM
Page: 1
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MEMO
To: Mayor and Town Council
Through: Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager
From: Mark C. Mayer, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
Date: July 26, 2002
Subj: Printing of the Compass and Just 4 Teens Publications
BACKGROUND: The Compass is the Town's major means of distribution of information to
residents, and is printed and mailed to residents every two months. Over the years and at Council's
direction the document has evolved from a few pages, specific to the Parks and Recreation
Department, with no color, to a twelve -page publication that now includes information from
various other departments and other community organizations. These organizations are typically
the local School District, the Senior Center, and the Fountain Hills branch of the county library.
These organizations have not contributed to the cost of printing and distributing the Compass in the
past.
The cost of printing the Compass and the Just 4 Teens publications is bid and is renewable for up to
three years with adjustments annually, based on the Consumer Price Index. We are currently in the
third and final year of renewal. Staff approached the Council at the June 20, 2002, meeting with a
request for approval of the renewal amount. Council approved the request but asked that the
Department research methods to reduce the cost. Staff agreed to provide a report back to the
Council regarding the steps that could be taken to reduce costs.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Staff _ researched three methods to reduce the cost of
printing the Compass. They included utilizing a lesser grade of paper, reducing the number of
pages currently printed from twelve to eight, and reducing the number of colors the document is
printed in which are currently four. Each would reduce the cost to varying degrees as outlined
below.
Current
Option #1
Option #2
Option #3
Option #4
Paper weight 80#
70#
80#
80#
70#
Number of pages 12
12
8
12
8
Colors 4 color
4 color
4 color
2 color
4 color
Annual Printing $45,092.51 $44,677.17 $34,009.23 $37,326.82 $33,593.89
Cost
0 Annual Savings $415.34 $11,083.28 $7,765.69 $11,498.62
ASK Staff, in preparing the various options, did contact the Seniors, School District, and the Library,
regarding whether they would be willing to potentially cover the cost of including their information
in each edition of the Compass, and of the two organizations that we have received responses back
from, both declined due to budget constraints.
Council may recall that the full amount requested in the budget of $56,500, including printing, the
bulk mailing permit and postage, was previously approved. Of this amount $48,381.50 was for
printing.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has concluded that Option #4, which
would reduce the number of pages to eight, reduce the weight of the paper but keep the four-color
option, is the best alternative. The four-color option gives us the full range of colors for printing.
With Option #4 the combined reductions would result in a savings of $11,498.62, without
significantly reducing the overall quality of the document.
In addition, staff will be publishing the Just 4 Teens in-house. This will result in an additional
annual savings of $3,288.99. Combined, these reductions to the Compass and Just 4 Teens will
total an annual savings of $14,787.61, some 31%.
Due to the time constraints of printing and mailing the August/September issue prior to the August
1 deadline, and with no Council meeting scheduled in July, staff pursued Option #4 with our
printer for this edition.
We will continue to include information from other Departments in the Compass, and on a space
available basis, other organizations at no additional cost to them as we have in the past.
r^1,un
vftw
a 4
�• esT 19,09
that is
DATE:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TOWN of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
August 9, 2002
The Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager
Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner
Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat Staff Report Update; Case
#S2001-16
Town Council unanimously continued the above referenced agenda item from the July 2, 2002
Town Council Meeting to the August 15, 2002 Town Council Meeting. The purpose of this
memorandum is to update the Town Council on the issues and concerns surrounding this
preliminary plat request, as directed by the Council at the July 2, 2002 Town Council Meeting.
The Town Council's concerns along with Staff's responses are as follows:
1) Request for an independent Traffic Study to be prepared on the Town's behalf for the
traffic and site line concerns presented by the public.
Response: Please find attached, the request from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, for an
independent Traffic Study to be performed by Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated July 10,
2002. Please also find attached, the Traffic Study and recommendations prepared
by Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated August 9, 2002, and the memorandum from Randy
Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 8, 2002, regarding Traffic Accident
Evaluation for Sierra Madre.
2) Request for traffic speed enforcement and report by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office.
Response: Please find attached, the Traffic Enforcement Study prepared by Captain Scott
Penrose of the Fountain Hills Sheriff s Office, dated August 5, 2002.
3) Request to provide the Sanitary District requirements for the proposed sewer pump lift
station as they pertain to ADEQ and other governmental agency regulations.
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
Response: Please find attached, a letter from Ronald Huber, dated July 15, 2002.
4) Future Trail Plan as specified by the General Plan, adopted by Town Council on June 20,
2002.
Response: The 2002 Adopted General Plan does not propose a future trail within Ashbrook
wash, north of Sierra Madre Drive. A vote of the Town electors is required for the
development within this Town -owned wash.
5) Request for the developer or the developer's representative to provide a written position on
the wash development issues.
Response: As the preliminary plat shows, there will not be any development activity, including
drainage structures, within the Town -owned wash. Please find attached, a written
position on the "wash issues", from Bob Sternfels, dated July 17, 2002.
6) Request for the Public Works Department to provide landscape maintenance of the
vehicular site lines within the Sierra Madre Right -of -Way along the "Sierra Madre Estates"
property frontage.
Response: Please find attached, memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated
August 1, 2002, regarding Maintenance of Medians.
It has been verbally communicated to Staff that representatives from MCO Properties will be
attending the August 15, 2002 Town Council Meeting, as requested by Town Council. If you have
any questions, I can be reached at (480) 816-5138.
Attachments:
• Letter from Randy Harrel to Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated July 10, 2002
• Traffic Study prepared by Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated August 9, 2002
• Memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 8, 2002, regarding Traffic
Accident Evaluation for Sierra Madre.
• Traffic Enforcement Study prepared by Captain Scott Penrose, dated August 5, 2002
• Letter from Ron Huber, Sanitary District General Manager, dated July 15, 2002
• Letter from Bob Sternfels, dated July 17, 2002
• Memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 1, 2002, regarding median
maintenance along Sierra Madre Drive.
• July 2, 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission and Staff Report (Town Council Packets only)
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
Ii N PO Box 17958
Fountain Hills AZ 85269
480-816 -5112
1�"�p,• FAX 480-837-1404
that
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Larry Woodlan/Burgess & Niple
From: Randy L. Harrel, P.E., L.S.
I
Date: July 10, 2002
Re: Proposal for review of traffic features and sightlines for
Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision
Copy To: Tom Ward
Art Candelaria
Bill Farrell
Sintra Hoffman
Honorable Mayor & Council
Jesse Drake
Dana Burkhardt
Ms. Janice Abramson
North Heights POA
15411 N. Tepic Lane
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
Transmittal to L. Woodlan 7-10-02.doc
SM Estates Traffic -Civil Engr Review.doc Page 1 of 2 Chron 130
w Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
% " 1 Off. Public Works Department
Engineering Division
4atis
July 5, 2002
Consultant Review
Traffic/Civil Engineering
Sierra Madre Estates -Phase I Subdivision (S2001-16)
Back rground
Sierra Madre Estates -Phase I is a proposed subdivision in the northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills,
consisting of nine, one -acre lots. Lots 1-2 and 3-4 will access Sierra Madre Drive through two joint
access driveways (and are required by stipulation to have on -site turnarounds, so that they will have
pull -forward access onto Sierra Madre Drive), Lots 5-9 will access a new hillside -local
classification roadway --Princess Drive --which will intersect Sierra Madre Drive about 400' west of
Golden Eagle Boulevard, an existing major collector roadway.
On July 2, 2002, the preliminary plat was continued by the Town Council until their August 15,
2002 meeting to allow time for an independent professional traffic engineering review of the traffic
kw features of this subdivision, especially regarding the following items:
F,vnluntion
Evaluate the appropriate design speed for street/driveway intersections. Note that:
• Existing Sierra Madre Drive roadway design speed - 25 mph
• Existing Dove Drive/Sierra Madre Drive intersection design speed - 30 mph
• Other existing Sierra Madre Drive street and driveway intersections - unknown; most
predate the Town and were not calculated; many believed to rate at less than 25 mph.
• Recent traffic/speed counts near Dove Drive:
Volume 1367 vpd
15%-ile speed 29 mph
50%-ile speed 34 mph
85%-ile speed 39 mph
• Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance requirements (Exhibit 16)
vs. 2000 AASHTO GDHS requirements.
• Review developer's plan/profile's grading adequacy to provide the needed street/driveway
sight distance.
• Calculate the required sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra
Madre onto the Lot 3-4 driveway G( DHS Case F), and evaluate whether it is met.
o Residents have reported measuring the available sightline at 250'.
o Staff calculated sight distance available is 290'.
o Staff calculated sight distance required is 220'.
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
SM Estates Traffic -Civil Engr Review.doc Page 2 of 2 Chron 130
• Evaluate allowing Princess Drive to intersect Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve:
o Subdivision Ordinance Section 305.D.7, states:
...Intersections on the inside of a horizontal curve on arterial, collector, or local
streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer (See
Exhibit 13).
o Subdivision Ordinance Exhibit 13, which illustrates prohibited intersections.
• Other critical traffic issue(s)... ?
Deliverables
• Advise staff of any additional field data, plans, and/or traffic counts needed.
• One field review on -site with Town staff.
• Prepare letter concerning the above evaluation items. Submit by August 12, 2002.
• Attend 8/15/02, 6:30 PM Council meeting to discuss.
Price
• Lump sum.
0
Attachments (to follow)
• Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat sheets
• Subdivision Ordinance
• Sightline drawings by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers, 15 pages
• Left turn from Sierra Madre sightline drawing by Town at SME Lots 3-4 driveway
• Town's Sightline criteria
o Intersection sight triangle
o Roadway sight triangle
o Sight distance requirements (from Subdivision Ordinance)
o Height of landscaping (Title ??)
o Letter from R. Harrel to Greg Bielli re Eagle Ridge North and Eagle's Nest ISD and
SSD dated 6/10/02
• Cover sheet from Sierra Madre Drive (25 mph design speed)
• Paving plan for Dove Drive @ Sierra Madre Drive (30 mph design speed)
• 6/4/02 memo from R. Harrel to D. Burkhardt re traffic speed/volume counts on Sierra Madre
near Dove Drive
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
BURGESS & NIPLE
Mr. Randy Harrel, PE, LS
Town of Fountain Hills
PO Box 17958
Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269
August 9, 2002
Re : Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision
Traffic Engineering Review
Dear Mr. Harrel:
Burgess & Niple,Inc.
5025 East Washington Street This writing is in regards to the Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision proposed in the
Suite 212 northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills consisting of nine, one -acre lots. Lots one and two
Phoenix, AZ 85034 and lots three and four will access Sierra Madre Drive through two joint access driveways.
602 244.8100 Lots five through nine will access a new hillside -local classification roadway called
Fax 602 244.1915 Princess Court that intersects Sierra Madre Drive west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. We
have completed the following as requested by the Town:
1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for strealdrive intersections.
2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001
American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements.
3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO
and Town required streeddriveway sight distance.
4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra
Madre onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO
and Town requirements.
5. Evaluate Princess Court intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve.
The following is a list of reference materials utilized during this review:
➢ Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat sheets
➢ Town of Fountain Hill's Subdivision Ordinance
➢ Sightline drawings by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers
➢ Left turn from Sierra Madre sightline drawing by Town at lots 3-4
driveway
➢ Town's intersection sight triangle
➢ Town's roadway sight triangle
➢ Town's sight distance requirements from Subdivision Ordinance
➢ Town's restrictions and pruning requirements within the sight triangle
➢ Letter regarding intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance for
Eagle Ridge North and Eagle's Nest
➢ Record drawings of Sierra Madre Drive
➢ Paving plans for Dove Drive and Sierra Madre Drive intersection
9 1
August 9, 2002
Page 2
➢ Memorandum g re ardin trafficspeed/volume eed/volume counts for Sierra Madre
g
Drive near Dove Drive
➢ Roadway functional classification system and transportation traffic counts
exhibit from the 2002 General Plan
➢ 2001 AASHTO GDHS
Also included later in this writing, are the following from the Town's Subdivision
Ordinance:
➢ Table 1 — Road Standards Table
➢ Exhibit 6 — Limited Collector Road Typical Section
➢ Exhibit 7 — Minor Collector Road Typical Section
➢ Exhibit 16 — Sight Distance Requirements
1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for street/drive intersections.
Design speed is a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of
a roadway. The design speed should be a logical one with respect to the topography,
anticipated operating speed, the adjacent land use, and the functional classification of the
roadway. The design speed should fit the travel desires and habits of most drivers
expected to use a particular facility. A consideration in selecting a design speed is the
average trip length. The longer the trip, the greater the driver's desire to use higher speeds.
Lower design speeds are generally applicable to local and collector streets through
® residential areas. They are also applicable to roads with winding alignment in rolling or
mountainous terrain or where environmental conditions dictate. High design speeds are
generally applicable to roads in level terrain or where environmental conditions are
favorable.
In evaluating the appropriate design speed for the street/drive intersections, several items
were taken into consideration. The first includes the original design speed for Sierra
Madre Drive. Based upon record drawings provided by the Town, the roadway design
speed for Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to Montezuma Boulevard was
25 miles per hour (mph). Even though the design speed listed was 25-mph, most of Sierra
Madre Drive may meet a much higher design speed. The second item is the 30-mph
intersection design speed of Dove Drive with Sierra Madre Drive located across from lot
number 8 of the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision. The other existing
street and driveway intersection design speeds along Sierra Madre Drive are unknown.
The last item is the recent measured traffic speed taken near Dove Drive on May 29, 2002
through June 2, 2002. The 85"' percentile operating speed was found to be 41-mph.
Operating speed is the speed at which drivers operate their vehicles during free flow
conditions. The 85"' percentile speed is usually the speed range used by most drivers, and
it is the most frequently used means to measure operating speed associated with a
particular location. It is desirable that the running speed of a large proportion of drivers be
lower than the design speed.
Speeds on roadways are governed by such factors as posted speed limits and turns into and
out of driveways and intersections. The addition of driveways and streets will typically
Burgess & Niple
N
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 3
cause drivers to decrease their speeds. With the addition of the proposed driveways and
street, one would expect to see a decline in the existing 85"' percentile speed.
Sierra Madre Drive is approximately 1 mile long. Recent traffic counts taken 300 feet east
and west of Dove Drive indicate that the two-way average daily traffic is 1,367 vehicles
per day. Based upon Table 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance, these items would most
closely resemble a minor collector. The existing roadway cross section of Sierra Madre
Drive is similar to both a limited collector road (exhibit 6) and a minor collector road
(exhibit 7). The minimum design speed for these cross sections are 25-mph and 30-mph
respectively. The 2002 Town of Fountain Hills General Plan classifies Sierra Madre Drive
as a minor collector. Per the Town's Subdivision Ordinance, the minimum roadway design
speed for a minor collector is 30-mph.
Normally the design speed selected to determine the various geometric design features
would be based upon the topography, the adjacent land use, the functional classification of
the roadway, and the anticipated operating speed. In this case, the measured operating
speed cannot be ignored. The data obtained by the Town indicates that vehicles are
operating at a speed closer to 40-mph.
It is appropriate to use a 40-mph design speed to determine the intersection sight
distances for the new driveways and Princess Court off Sierra Madre Drive.
2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001 American
Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric
Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements.
Sight distance is the length of the roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. The available
sight distance on a roadway should be sufficiently long to enable a vehicle traveling at or
near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. We have
reviewed the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance requirements (Exhibit 16)
versus the 2001 AASHTO GDHS requirements for passenger cars. The following values
listed are the minimum design intersection sight distance requirements per the 2001
AASHTO GDHS, and the Town's Subdivision Ordinance and are as follows:
Town
AASHTO
Town
AASHTO
(30 mph)
(30 mph)
(40mph)
(40 mph)
(feet)
(feet)
(feet)
(feet)
Lots 1 and 2 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway 380
335
580
445
Right turn from the driveway 380
290
580
385
Lots 3 and 4 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
380
365
580
490
Right turn from the driveway
380
290
580
385
Princess Court
Left turn from Princess Court
380
365
580
490
Right turn from Princess Court
380
290
580
385
August 9, 2002
Page 4
As can be seen above, the Subdivision Ordinance's sight distance requirements for
g
passenger cars is more than required by the 2001 AASHTO GDHS for each case.
3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and
Town required street/driveway sight distance.
The developer's plan/profile's grading for the above referenced street/driveway sight
distances were reviewed and were compared to the AASHTO requirements for a 40-mph
design speed and are as follows:
Available/
AASHTO
Provided
Required
(feet)
(feet)
Lots 1 and 2 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
500
445
Right turn from the driveway
380
385
Lots 3 and 4 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
380
490
Right turn from the driveway
380
385
Princess Court
Left turn from Princess Court
380
490
® Right turn from Princess Court
266
385
The available sight distance for a left turn from the lots 1-2 driveway is 500 feet. This
meets the AASHTO requirements based upon a 40-mph design speed. For right turns from
the driveway, no grading was needed in order to obtain the 380-foot sight distance. In
order to provide the minimum 385-foot sight distance as required by AASHTO, grading.
may or may not even be needed.
For the lots 3-4 driveway, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to
obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already
been shown may or may not even be needed to provide the minimum AASHTO sight
distance requirements for a 40-mph design speed listed above.
For the left turn from Princess Court, the proposed plans show that grading is required in
order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has
already been shown will be needed to provide the minimum 490-foot sight distance listed
above. For the right turn from Princess Court, the required AASHTO sightline distance of
385 feet ends in the intersection of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The alignment of this
sightline intersects the existing north side curb and gutter just west of Golden Eagle
Boulevard. The area within this sight triangle shall be clear of any obstructions. Based
upon a field visit and record drawings, the intersection sight distance can be obtained with
the removal and or relocation of existing vegetation. Also, the developer is providing
advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching the proposed Princess Court in each
direction.
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 5
As shown on the previous page, the Town requires a minimum sight distance of 580 feet
for a 40-mph design speed. The developer did not provide profiles indicating whether a
40-mph design speed can be met. The plans provided by the developer do meet the
Town's 30-mph design speed.
The 40-mph sight distance design speed should be analyzed.
4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre
onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO and Town
requirements.
We have calculated the required sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn
from Sierra Madre Drive onto the lots 1-2 driveway, the lots 34 driveway, and Princess
Court per the 2001 AASHTO GDHS to be 325 feet for each based upon a design speed of
40-mph. The driveway of most concern is the lots 3-4 driveway since it is located near a
crest curve. The profile provided by the Town for this driveway shows an available
sightline distance of 312 feet, and we concur. As a back check, we used the record
drawings of Sierra Madre Drive to determine that the available sightline distance is at least
305 feet per AASHTO requirements.
The lots 1-2 driveway and Princess Court meet the AASHTO minimum sight distance
requirements for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive for a 40-mph design speed.
The lots 3-4 driveway do not meet the AASHTO minimum 325-foot sight distance
requirement for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive due to the existing roadway
crest vertical curve. An advanced driveway approach warning sign for westbound
vehicles approaching the proposed driveway must be installed.
S. Evaluate Princess Drive intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve.
As indicated in the Subdivision Ordinance, intersections on the inside of a horizontal curve
on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the
Town Engineer. Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to approximately 1,500
feet west is a divided roadway with landscaped median. From this location to almost 500
feet west, the roadway narrows from the aforementioned to two lanes. This is also the west
end of the Sierra Madre Estates Phase 1 development. There is also one existing local
street, Dove Drive, situated about 800 feet west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. It accesses
residential properties on the south side of Sierra Madre Drive. The land along the north
side of Sierra Madre is currently zoned residential and permits development.
Management of driveway/street access to collectors is desirable. Access control should be
used to reduce traffic congestion. Uncontrolled access will interfere with through traffic.
The developer has combined driveways for lots 1-2 and lots 3-4 into two joint access
driveways and has the driveways from lots 5 through 9 off of Princess Court. The
developer has reduced the number of driveway entrances off of Sierra Madre Drive from
nine to three. This reduces traffic congestion. The developer is also going to provide
advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching eastbound and westbound proposed
Princess Court.
Burgess & Niple
09
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 6
Our evaluation is that Princess Court entrance off of Sierra Madre Drive is preferred
over having five driveway entrances. Princess Court can be located on the inside of a
horizontal curve as long as the minimum sight distance is provided. If the minimum
sight distance cannot be met, advanced warning signs must be installed on Sierra
Madre Drive.
As a final note, we recommend that the existing vegetation not only be relocated and/or
removed to maintain the required sight distances, but also that the vegetation that does not
require removal or relocating be maintained for years to come. This is for both the median
and along the edge of roadway.
Respectfully submitted,
17.4 P QJ Q�lession F
a�
0ioa �Z\FtCAtF
Patrick D. Osborne, PE o, �' 35799 c r`
PATRICK D.
Project Engineer OSBORNE
Enclosures
copy: Mr. Tom Ward, Town of Fountain Hills
Larry Woodlan, PE
Table 1
ROAD STANDARDS TABLE
e
Right -of-
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Reverse
t
n
z
Way
2-Way ADT
Design
Roadway
Minimum
Horizontal
Curve
Radius
Speed
Length
Curve Length
Tan ent'
Hillside -Local
26'
40'
300'
20 MPH
1,500'
100,
100,
01
Local
321
50'
700
25 MPH
1,500'
200'
100,
0,
Limited Collector
40 '
82'
900
25 MPH
2,000'
200'
100,
0,
Minor Collector
40'
60'
5,000
30 MPH
1 Mile
300'
150,
Major Collector
56'
100,
7,000
35 MPH
2 Miles
500'
150,
Minor Arterial
130'
22,000
45 MPH
-
'
80'
-incipal Arterial
160'
45,000
50 MPH
--
'
108'
46
Notes:
Minimum length of tangent between curves in opposite directions (reverse
cures). Reverse curves without tangent section between the curves are not
permitted, except on local streets.
Fourteen foot wide landscaped medians are required on limited collector
roadways. 16 foot wide landscaped medians are required on major collector and
minor arterial roadways. 20 foot wide landscaped medians are required on
principal arterial roadways. All median widths are included in the pavement
width as shown on the typical sections.
Per the Town Engineer.
October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-13
C�
Exhibit 6
LIMITED COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION
_JUJ
<
0 m
li Q <
� W
< 1 O
U W W
OJZ
U1 mV)Cr z
J
a JOp
W ZO N
O !n <
W
W J U
Con-2 < W
<' In<w
W O } J p
am <�<
3�a
oxV)
O d O > w
N !r w a
N N a o 0
Q OW �p p -
w� Jaa
o0 00<
o= �<
V) r 0 w
p < = O
<a~w
O O
<
w
a
wLu <
W J
<
H �
In Z
F W
In
W
a
w
X 0
X p
wN w
w
�o m
v> Ln a
UJ00
? z
Z m J
wa tO>
J v > d
< cn O
Z
Ln 2 Ci >
Q O
Li a
w a
z0 Za
vpiW �<
0 M O
O O
ON��o
a i�
October 3, 1996
Article III, Page 3-16
3-
Exhibit 7
MINOR COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION
0
n
-7N/7 MI&
�I
Z
a
W
Q
J
_Q
U
VI
W
�
(n
1
W
U
a O
@S
U
J "
21
Q J
U
w�
U
O D
cr
W O
O
Q
00
W
U-L-
N
a
>-
mmZ
QQW
J
j
N
5
J w
Q p
O
to cD W
w N
Qf
_
0
00�
�t
00
Ln
U Lj a
�
�a
aaa
D,
0
a
October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-17
Exhibit 16
SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
18' STREET ORI DER S EYE
10' ORII/EWA Y 4.25 FEET HIGH
AREA MUST BE CLEAR OF SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS
/nn l /AIT
�z
_ CENTER OF LANE
(.. 5 FEET HIGH)
D 04-
D
TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH)
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
D
240
300
380
470
580
710
840
CENTER OF LANE
(3.5 FEET HIGH)
55
990
October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-27
Chron 163
O��'tAT11T
I I N
NOW 0
�3
b
that is
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
MEMORANDUM
4
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council ,I
FROM: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer l t ✓�
THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public Wootg*
DATE: August 8, 2002
RE: Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision
Traffic Accident Evaluation for Sierra Madre
During the previous Council discussion regarding the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision, the issue of
traffic safety along Sierra Madre was raised. Proposed safety measures at the new subdivision were as indicated
on the Preliminary Plan Plat (and in the stipulations).
Since then Staff has additionally reviewed the accident records for Sierra Madre Drive from 1990-2002, and we
have compared those accidents to the accidents on SunRidge Drive since 1990. SunRidge Drive and Sierra
Madre Drive are both collector roadways in the northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills. Sierra Madre is about half
the length of SunRidge Drive, Sierra Madre Drive and SunRidge Drive each have a medianed section and an un-
medianed section, and both have bike lanes. Traffic counts (counted in the year 2002, except as noted) are in the
same range as follows:
• Sierra Madre Drive
@ SunRidge Drive (1997 count)- 800 vpd
@ Golden Eagle Boulevard - 1500 vpd
SunRidize Drive
@ Golden Eagle Boulevard - 400 vpd
@ Desert Canyon Drive (north leg) -1650 vpd
@ Desert Canyon (south leg) - 2450 vpd
@ Palisades Boulevard -3260 vpd
Sierra Madre has a 25 mph posted speed limit (as set by the Road Districts), and SunRidge Drive has a 35 mph
posted speed limit.
Sierra Madre has had only 9 accidents in the last 12 years (1990-2002) as follows, whereas, SunRidge Drive has
had 19 accidents since then (additionally, two parts of SunRidge Drive have only been open to traffic for only 3
and 6 years.)
Sierra Madre Traffic Accident evaluation for Sierra Madre Drive.doc Page 1 of 2
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
Chron 163
TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
0 Sierra Madre — 9 Total
• @ Golden Eagle Boulevard — 512)
• @ San Diego Circle — 3 (3)
• @ San Tomas Place - 1
°" Accidents are since 1990. All of Sierra Madre, and 1/3 of SunRidge Drive (from Delgado Drive to Golden Eagle) were open to traffic in 1990.
The remaining section of SunRidge Drive did not open until 1996 and 1998.
(21 Sierra Madre or SunRidge Drive is a stopped street at this location.
(31 Closer review indicates that two of these accidents on San Diego Circle were single vehicle accidents, which appeared to be related to
construction on San Diego Circle itself, and didn't actually have any cause or effect from Sierra Madre.
The above Golden Eagle/Sierra Madre accidents were at a stopped intersection and as of the San Diego Circle
accidents are unrelated to Sierra Madre, there have only been two roadway accidents along Sierra Madre in 12
years -- a good record.
In summary, Sierra Madre is a reasonably safe street as it currently exists, and can be expected to remain so after
Sierra Madre Estates is constructed.
/jb
cc: Jesse Drake
Dana Burkhardt
Tom Ward
Larry Woodlan/Burgess-Niple
Art Candelaria
Sierra Madre Traffic Accident evaluation for Sierra Madre Drive.doc Page 2 of 2
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
To: Sintra Hoffinan
Town Manager
From: Capt. Scott
Memorandum
Town of Fountain Hills I Fountain Hills SlZriff's Office
Subject: Traffic Enforcement Study
Joseph M. A,p.io, Sheriff
Date: August 5, 2002
Introduction: On July 11 "', 2002 I was directed to provide a traffic safety study for the
area of Sierra Madre Dr. west of Golden Eagle. This study would examine the elements
of speed and safe driving .
Study: The parameters of the study were as follows:
The study was conducted during the hours of lam to 8pm seven days a week. The
Sheriff s Office would use unmarked vehicles to enforce traffic laws. On all but two
occasions, unmarked vehicles were used in an effort to appear less invasive due to the
political climate of this street. In the area of Sierra Madre, enforcement vehicles were
stationed at Dove Dr. Vehicles traveling over 10 mph were issued a warning while
vehicles over 15 mph could be issued a citation. Enforcement action was divided into
one -hour blocks with usually no more than one block per day. In order to keep
spontaneity, some days went without enforcement action. A total of 16 days or
approximately 16 hours were used for the Sierra Madre study.
Comparison: A comparison street was used to add credibility to the Sierra Madre study.
Sunridge Dr. was used for this comparison. Although Sunridge Dr is a 35 mph zone, this
street was recommended by the Fountain Hills Traffic Engineering Department, due to
the similar makeup it shares with Sierra Madre. Unmarked vehicles were also used and
11 days or approximately 11 hours were used for the Sunridge Dr. study. Enforcement
vehicles were placed on Staghorn Dr. and Rhodes Ct. during this study.
History: A three-year history of Sierra Madre Dr. and Sunridge Dr. shows at least 43
speeding citations for Sierra Madre Dr. and ten speeding citations for Sunridge Dr. Sierra
Madre showed approximately 48 warnings for speeding, while Sunridge Dr. had 15.
These figures include the recent study and all Marshal's Department statistics.
L
Findings: Total findings for the study revealed the following information. Average
speed for Sierra Madre Dr. was 30.72 mph. Average speed for Sunridge Dr. was 37.55
mph. A total of 420 cars were recorded on Sierra Madre and 368 on Sunridge Dr.
Although unmarked cars were used, it should be noted that as the study progressed the
average speed seemed to decline. This could indicate that drivers had begun to notice
that enforcement action that was taking place. This is quite common in traffic
enforcement issues as word sometimes travels throughout the neighborhoods.
Conclusion: This study was conducted in an effort to determine if a traffic safety
hazzard was present on Sierra Madre Dr. Conclusions indicate that the average speed of
30.72 mph would not be considered excessive when determining traffic enforcement. I
am, however, concerned that speeds of 49, 46, and 45 mph where documented.
Therefore, while the average speed is not a concern, the Sheriffs Office will continue to
enforce speed limits along Sierra Madre Dr. Other issues such as line of sight and
parking will need to be addressed by the traffic engineers.
Traffic Chart
Sunridge Dr. Sierra Madre
Speed Limit
35 mph
25 mph
Total Vehicles
368
420
Average Speed
37.55 mph
30.72 mph
+ or — Speed Limit
+ 2.55
+ 5.72
5 Highest Speeds
56951,48946946
49946945942942
Warnings Issued
12
35
Citations Issued
2
6
k
LOUNTAIN HILLS SANITARY DISTRICT
16941 E. PEPPERWOOD CIRCLE `
FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ 85268-2901
(480) 837-9444 FAX (480) 837-0819
July 15, 2002
Randy Harrel, P.E. Town Engineer
Town of Fountain Hills
P. O. Box 17958
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
Re: Sierra Madre Estates
Dear Randy:
This letter is written in response to your telephone conversation with me today concerning the
Town Council's review of the Sierra Madre Estates plat prior to its approval or disapproval.
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) does not review sewer -related
infrastructure plans in Maricopa County. That task has been formally delegated to the
Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD). The MCESD reviews plans
simultaneously with the Fountain Hills Sanitary District (FHSD) after preliminary plats have
been approved. MCESD reviews plans for conformance to minimum design standards (ADEQ
Engineering Bulletin 11). They don't care if a sewer line is in a wash only that it is protected by
damage due to scour from flow in the wash. FHSD's mimimum design standards are more
stringent. Consequently, everything built within the District's boundaries are constructed to the
higher standard.
With respect to where and how Sierra Madre Estates is sewered, that decision is the authority of
FHSD. There are a number of sewer options which are technically feasible, two of which are
shown on the preliminary plat. The alternative presented by the developer which shows
multiple lots being served by a pump station, while technically feasible, is not acceptable to
either the District or MCESD. MCESD will not allow a pump station serving multiple lots to be
operated by any entity other than the District. The District will not own and operate such a
facility when there are other options. The evaluation of the other options will take place after
preliminary plat approval.
The Town Council would be wise to approve or disapprove the preliminary plat for Sierra
Madre Estates based upon issues other than sewer since they do not have authority over sewer
matters. Ultimately, if the Preliminary Plat is approved, the subdivision will require sewer
approval from the District. The District's approval will be consistent with ordinances, laws and
legal remedies available to it.
Sincerely,
Ronald D. Huber, P.E.
General Manager
/cjm
LOUIS G. JEKEL
ROBERT C. HOWARD, JR.
ROBERT B. STERNFELS
CH
TINE E. PESTICCI'•
DI _RADER
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT E. THOMSON
JAMES E. MERRIMAN •••
Also admitted in California
Also admitted in Connecticut'•
Also admitted in Colorado
and New York •••
Please reply to Fountain Hills office
FOUNTAIN HILLS OFFICE
Jekel. Howard & Sternfels, L.L.P.
16803 E. Palisades Boulevard
Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268-3824
480 816-9985
fax 480 816-5342
r.sternfels@worldnet.att.net
SCOTTSDALE OFFICE
Jekel & Howard, L.L.P.
8283 N. Hayden Road, Suite 100
Scottsdale. Arizona 85258-2455
480 948-7060
fax 480 951-0463
PINNACLE PEAK OFFICE
Jekel & Howard, L.L.P.
8900 E. Pinnacle Peak Road, Suite D-230
Scle, Arizona 85255-3622
480 948-7060
fax 480 951-0463
JEKEL, HOWAR 4TERNFELS, L.L.P.
Attorneys at Law
Wednesday, July 17, 2002
Dana Burkhardt
Senior Planner
Town of Fountain Hills
16836 E. Palisades Blvd.
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
Re: Sierra Madre Estates. Case Number S2001-16
Dear Dana:
As I noted, the developer desires to comply with the law in every respect.
As a result, here is the developer's response to the "wash issues."
1. Sewer Line. Conditioned upon the approval of preliminary and final
plat, the developer will accept the sewer stipulations as written by
staff. There appears to be other viable alternatives that may present a
better solution than even alternative 2 as amended and therefore all
parties (the Town, the developer and the Sanitary District) desire to
keep the options open. At present the best solution may involve tying
into the sewer line within the right of way. The developer's
engineers are exploring this alternative now. Suffice it to say,
however, that so long as prohibited by the wash ordinance, the
developer will stay out of the wash.
2. Rip -Rap. Again, conditioned upon the approval of preliminary and
final plat, the developer will accept staffs stipulations relativg to the
w
rip -rap. The developer amended it's plans to show that the rip -rap
will be placed on its property and not in the wash.
3. Drain Pipe. Likewise, conditioned upon the approval of preliminary
and final plat, the developer will accept staff s stipulations relative to
the drain pipe. The developer amended it's plans to show that the
drain pipe will be placed on its property and not in the wash.
I trust this letter explains the developer's' position as you requested. If it
does not, please give me a call. As you can see, it is the developer's goal to
cooperate with you and your staff to create a beautiful addition to our Town in
compliance with the law. ti
4
RBS/lnc
cc: Bo Rajkovski
Butch Larson
Rytan LLC
V..
Sincerely,
4611�1
Page 1 of 3 Chron 154
�.. a1111111
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
% I �bo Public Works Department
Engineering Division
� is MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Coil 1 fw
YEngineer���
FROM: Rand Harrel, Town
THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public W
DATE: August 1, 2002
RE: Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision Homeowners' Association
Maintenance of Medians vs. potential turnover to the Town
This letter addresses the question of whether a Developer/Homeowners' Association can or should
maintain median and roadway frontage landscaping, versus Town maintenance as it relates to the
proposed Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision.
Sierra Madre Estates' preliminary plat stipulation #3 states:
Provide a note on the Final Plat, as well as a recorded copy of the deed restrictions and the
property owner's association by-laws, that would require each property owner to maintain their
Right -of -Way frontage landscaping and vehicular sightlines, including the Sierra Madre median
landscaping, in a manner that provides safe vehicular sight visibility as required by the Town
Engineer.
On Sierra Madre, the North Heights Property Owners' Association currently maintains the center median
landscaping. At the proposed median -cut area, note 4 on page 6 of the Preliminary Plat appropriately
indicates that at the proposed median reconfiguration:
Acceptable reconstruction to be coordinated with North Heights Property Homeowners'
Association
Since 1995, the Town has normally accepted median landscape maintenance on public arterial and collector
roadways (Sierra Madre is a public collector roadway) from a Developer or Homeowners' Association,
subject to the following conditions:
Receiving a request from that Developer or Homeowners' Association.
Specific approval action of the Town Council (unless authorized in a previous Council action —
such as a master plan, plat, rezoning, variance, etc).
Correction of any deficiencies: landscape, ground cover, and irrigation.
Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision HOA Maintenace of Median vs Potential turnover to the Town.doc
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
Page 2 of 3
Chron 154
Since 1995 the Town has gradually been requested to and has accepted landscape maintenance
responsibility for most of the collector and arterial street median landscaping on public streets within the
Town. However, the following public street medians are still currently maintained by
Developer/Homeowner Associations:
• Eagle Mountain Parkway (Shea Blvd to gate east of Summerhill Blvd)
• Summerhill Blvd (Eagle Mountain Parkway to gate north of Mira Monte)
• Palisades Blvd (Shea Blvd south to gate)
• FireRock Country Club Drive (Shea Blvd to gate)
• Shea Blvd (west of Technology Drive to west of Saguaro Blvd)131
• Technology Drive (north of Laser Drive to Shea Blvd)")
• SunRidge Drive (Palisades Blvd to south of Delgado Drive) (2)
• Desert Canyon Drive (full length) (2)
• Siena Madre Drive (Golden Eagle Blvd to west of Dove Drive)
• CopperWynd Drive (Palisades to west end; 3/4's of this is in Scottsdale)
• Shadow Canyon Drive
• Westridge Drive
• Vista Drive
• Avenue of the Fountains (Palisades to west of LaMontana)(3)
• "Entrance" medians in front of gates — many locations
• "Private" medianed roadways — many locations t'1
• "Local street" medians — many locations (1)
(1) Based on consistency with previous Council actions.
(2)Per Council approved "trade off of responsiblies".
(3) Currently within the "initial" maintenance period.
Developers must install their medians in accordance with the Town's Subdivision Ordinance, which
states:
607-H Roadway Sight Lines. Landscaping materials proposed in or near right-of-way shall be
approved at the discretion of the Town Engineer to ensure that roadway sight lines are maintained.
Both Developers and Homeowners' Associations must maintain their median landscapes in accordance with
the Town Code, which states:
Section 11-1-8 It is unlawful for any person to maintain or allow any tree, hedge, billboard or other
obstruction which prevent persons driving vehicles on public streets, alleys or highways from
obtaining a clear view of traffic when approaching an intersection or pedestrian crosswalk.
Frontage Landscaping
Similarly, past staff recommendations and Town Council actions have consistently left frontage landscaping
(between the street curb and the front yard or street side yard property line) with maintenance by the frontage
property owner, in accordance with the above noted Town Code provisions.
Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision HOA Maintenace of Median vs Potential turnover to the Town.doc
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
Page 3 of 3
Ctuon 154
The above long-standing Town "Policies" are consistent with the current recommended stipulations for the
Sierra Madre Estates subdivision.
/jb
cc: Tom Ward
Art Candelaria
Jesse Drake
Dana Burkhardt
David Stepanek
Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision HOA Maintenace of Median vs Potential turnover to the Town.doc
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
Sierra Madre T.E. Report.doc
Chron 166
IL
a �
�• An 190
that is
N
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Public Works Department
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council
L�
FROM: Randy L. Harrel
DATE: August 9, 2002
MEMORANDUM
RE: Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision
Traffic Engineering Report
Attached is the Traffic Engineering report of the above subdivision from Burgess & Niple, Inc.
Staff is currently reviewing the report and will have analysis and evaluation comments available for
the August 12th meeting.
ME
att.
BURGESS & NIPLE
Mr. Randy Harrel, PE, LS Re : Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision
Town of Fountain Hills Traffic Engineering Review
PO Box 17958
Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269
August 9, 2002
Dear Mr. Harrel:
Burgess & Niple, Inc.
5025 East Washington Street
This writing is in regards to the Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision proposed in the
Suite 212
northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills consisting of nine, one -acre lots. Lots one and two
Phoenix, AZ 85034
and lots three and four will access Siena Madre Drive through two joint access driveways.
602 244.8100
Lots five through nine will access a new hillside -local classification roadway called
Fax 602 244.1915
Princess Court that intersects Sierra Madre Drive west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. We
have completed the following as requested by the Town:
1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for streeddrive intersections.
2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001
American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements.
3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO
and Town required street/driveway sight distance.
4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra
Madre onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO
and Town requirements.
5. Evaluate Princess Court intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve.
The following is a list of reference materials utilized during this review:
➢
Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat sheets
➢
Town of Fountain Hill's Subdivision Ordinance
➢
Sightline drawings by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers
➢
Left turn from Sierra Madre Sightline drawing by Town at lots 3-4
driveway
➢
Town's intersection sight triangle
➢
Town's roadway sight triangle
➢
Town's sight distance requirements from Subdivision Ordinance
➢
Town's restrictions and pruning requirements within the sight triangle
➢
Letter regarding intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance for
Eagle Ridge North and Eagle's Nest
➢
Record drawings of Sierra Madre Drive
➢
Paving plans for Dove Drive and Sierra Madre Drive intersection
August 9, 2002
Page 2
➢ Memorandum regarding traffic speed/volume counts for Sierra Madre
Drive near Dove Drive
➢ Roadway functional classification system and transportation traffic counts
exhibit from the 2002 General Plan
➢ 2001 AASHTO GDHS
Also included later in this writing, are the following from the Town's Subdivision
Ordinance:
➢ Table 1 — Road Standards Table
➢ Exhibit 6 — Limited Collector Road Typical Section
➢ Exhibit 7 — Minor Collector Road Typical Section
➢ Exhibit 16 — Sight Distance Requirements
1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for street/drive intersections.
Design speed is a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of
a roadway. The design speed should be a logical one with respect to the topography,
anticipated operating speed, the adjacent land use, and the functional classification of the
roadway. The design speed should fit the travel desires and habits of most drivers
expected to use a particular facility. A consideration in selecting a design speed is the
average trip length. The longer the trip, the greater the driver's desire to use higher speeds.
Lower design speeds are generally applicable to local and collector streets through
residential areas. They are also applicable to roads with winding alignment in rolling or
mountainous terrain or where environmental conditions dictate. High design speeds are
generally applicable to roads in level terrain or where environmental conditions are
favorable.
In evaluating the appropriate design speed for the street/drive intersections, several items
were taken into consideration. The first includes the original design speed for Sierra
Madre Drive. Based upon record drawings provided by the Town, the roadway design
speed for Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to Montezuma Boulevard was
25 miles per hour (mph). Even though the design speed listed was 25-mph, most of Sierra
Madre Drive may meet a much higher design speed. The second item is the 30-mph
intersection design speed of Dove Drive with Sierra Madre Drive located across from lot
number 8 of the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision. The other existing
street and driveway intersection design speeds along Sierra Madre Drive are unknown.
The last item is the recent measured traffic speed taken near Dove Drive on May 29, 2002
through June 2, 2002. The 85`b percentile operating speed was found to be 41-mph.
Operating speed is the speed at which drivers operate their vehicles during free flow
conditions. The 85t' percentile speed is usually the speed range used by most drivers, and
it is the most frequently used means to measure operating speed associated with a
particular location. It is desirable that the running speed of a large proportion of drivers be
lower than the design speed.
Speeds on roadways are governed by such factors as posted speed limits and turns into and
out of driveways and intersections. The addition of driveways and streets will typically
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 3
® cause drivers to decrease their speeds. With the addition of the proposed driveways and
street, one would expect to see a decline in the existing 85"' percentile speed.
Sierra Madre Drive is approximately 1 mile long. Recent traffic counts taken 300 feet east
and west of Dove Drive indicate that the two-way average daily traffic is 1,367 vehicles
per day. Based upon Table 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance, these items would most
closely resemble a minor collector. The existing roadway cross section of Sierra Madre
Drive is similar to both a limited collector road (exhibit 6) and a minor collector road
(exhibit 7). The minimum design speed for these cross sections are 25-mph and 30-mph
respectively. The 2002 Town of Fountain Hills General Plan classifies Sierra Madre Drive
as a minor collector. Per the Town's Subdivision Ordinance, the minimum roadway design
speed for a minor collector is 30-mph.
Normally the design speed selected to determine the various geometric design features
would be based upon the topography, the adjacent land use, the functional classification of
the roadway, and the anticipated operating speed. In this case, the measured operating
speed cannot be ignored. The data obtained by the Town indicates that vehicles are
operating at a speed closer to 40-mph.
It is appropriate to use a 40-mph design speed to determine the intersection sight
distances for the new driveways and Princess Court off Sierra Madre Drive.
2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001 American
Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric
Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements.
Sight distance is the length of the roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. The available
sight distance on a roadway should be sufficiently long to enable a vehicle traveling at or
near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. We have
reviewed the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance requirements (Exhibit 16)
versus the 2001 AASHTO GDHS requirements for passenger cars. The following values
listed are the minimum design intersection sight distance requirements per the 2001
AASHTO GDHS, and the Town's Subdivision Ordinance and are as follows:
Town AASHTO Town AASHTO
(30 mph) (30 mph) (40mph) (40 mph)
(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet)
Lots 1 and 2 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway 380 335 580 445
Right turn from the driveway 380 290 580 385
Lots 3 and 4 Driveway _
Left turn from the driveway 380 365 580 490
Right turn from the driveway 380 290 580 385
Princess Court
Left turn from Princess Court 380 365 580 490
Right turn from Princess Court 380 290 580 385
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 4
As can be seen above, the Subdivision Ordinance's sight distance requirements for
passenger cars is more than required by the 2001 AASHTO GDHS for each case.
3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and
Town required street/driveway sight distance.
The developer's plan/profile's grading for the above referenced street/driveway sight
distances were reviewed and were compared to the AASHTO requirements for a 40-mph
design speed and are as follows:
Available/
AASHTO
Provided
Required
(feet)
(feet)
Lots 1 and 2 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
500
445
Right turn from the driveway
380
385
Lots 3 and 4 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
380
490
Right turn from the driveway
380
385
Princess Court
Left turn from Princess Court
380
490
Right turn from Princess Court
266
385
The available sight distance for a left turn from the lots 1-2 driveway is 500 feet. This
meets the AASHTO requirements based upon a 40-mph design speed. For right turns from
the driveway, no grading was needed in order to obtain the 380-foot sight distance. In
order to provide the minimum 385-foot sight distance as required by AASHTO, grading.
may or may not even be needed.
For the lots 3-4 driveway, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to
obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already
been shown may or may not even be needed to provide the minimum AASHTO sight
distance requirements for a 40-mph design speed listed above.
For the left turn from Princess Court, the proposed plans show that grading is required in
order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has
already been shown will be needed to provide the minimum 490-foot sight distance listed
above. For the right turn from Princess Court, the required AASHTO sightline distance of
385 feet ends in the intersection of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The alignment of this
sightline intersects the existing north side curb and gutter just west of Golden Eagle
Boulevard. The area within this sight triangle shall be clear of any obstructions. Based
upon a field visit and record drawings, the intersection sight distance can be obtained with
the removal and or relocation of existing vegetation. Also, the developer is providing
advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching the proposed Princess Court in each
direction.
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 5
As shown on the previous page, the Town requires a minimum sight distance of 580 feet
for a 40-mph design speed. The developer did not provide profiles indicating whether a
40-mph design speed can be met. The plans provided by the developer do meet the
Town's 30-mph design speed.
The 40-mph sight distance design speed should be analyzed.
4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre
onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO and Town
requirements.
We have calculated the required sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn
from Sierra Madre Drive onto the lots 1-2 driveway, the lots 3-4 driveway, and Princess
Court per the 2001 AASHTO GDHS to be 325 feet for each based upon a design speed of
40-mph. The driveway of most concern is the lots 3-4 driveway since it is located near a
crest curve. The profile provided by the Town for this driveway shows an available
sightline distance of 312 feet, and we concur. As a back check, we used the record
drawings of Sierra Madre Drive to determine that the available sightline distance is at least
305 feet per AASHTO requirements.
The lots 1-2 driveway and Princess Court meet the AASHTO minimum sight distance
requirements for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive for a 40-mph design speed.
® The lots 3-4 driveway do not meet the AASHTO minimum 325-foot sight distance
requirement for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive due to the existing roadway
crest vertical curve. An advanced driveway approach warning sign for westbound
vehicles approaching the proposed driveway must be installed.
5. Evaluate Princess Drive intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve.
As indicated in the Subdivision Ordinance, intersections on the inside of a horizontal curve
on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the
Town Engineer. Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to approximately 1,500
feet west is a divided roadway with landscaped median. From this location to almost 500
feet west, the roadway narrows from the aforementioned to two lanes. This is also the west
end of the Sierra Madre Estates Phase 1 development. There is also one existing local
street, Dove Drive, situated about 800 feet west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. It accesses
residential properties on the south side of Sierra Madre Drive. The land along the north
side of Sierra Madre is currently zoned residential and permits development.
Management of driveway/street access to collectors is desirable. Access control should be
used to reduce traffic congestion. Uncontrolled access will interfere with through traffic.
The developer has combined driveways for lots 1-2 and lots 3-4 into two joint access
driveways and has the driveways from lots 5 through 9 off of Princess Court. The
developer has reduced the number of driveway entrances off of Sierra Madre Drive from
nine to three. This reduces traffic congestion. The developer is also going to provide
advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching eastbound and westbound proposed
Princess Court.
Burgess & Niple
CJ
ra
Burgess & Niple
August 9, 2002
Page 6
Our evaluation is that Princess Court entrance off of Sierra Madre Drive is preferred
over having five driveway entrances. Princess Court can be located on the inside of a
horizontal curve as long as the minimum sight distance is provided. If the minimum
sight distance cannot be met, advanced warning signs must be installed on Sierra
Madre Drive.
As a final note, we recommend that the existing vegetation not only be relocated and/or
removed to maintain the required sight distances, but also that the vegetation that does not
require removal or relocating be maintained for years to come. This is for both the median
and along the edge of roadway.
Respectfully submitted,
Patrick D. Osborne, PE
Project Engineer
Enclosures
copy: Mr. Tom Ward, Town of Fountain Hills
Larry Woodlan, PE
Q�9tesslona/per
ioa \rICA77,
35799 °
PATRICK D.
cc OSBORNE t
Table 1
ROAD STANDARDS TABLE
Street Type
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Reverse
Right -of-
Maximum
Minimum
(Pavement
Way'
2-Way ADT
Design
Roadway
Radius
Horizontal
Curve
Width)
Speed
Length
Curve Length
Tangent'
Hillside -Local
40'
300'
20 MPH
1,500'
100,
100,
0'
26'
Local
50'
700
25 MPH
1,500'
200'
100,
0'
32'
Limited Collector
82'
900
25 MPH
2,000'
200'
100,
0'
40 '
Minor Collector
60'
5,000
30 MPH
1 Mile
300'
150'
40'
Major Collector
100'
7,000
35 MPH
2 Miles
500'
150'
56'
Minor Arterial
130'
22,000
45 MPH
--
80'
opal Arterial
160'
45,000
50 MPH
'
108'
3
Notes:
Minimum length of tangent between curves in opposite directions (reverse
cures). Reverse curves without tangent section between the curves are not
permitted, except on local streets.
Fourteen foot wide landscaped medians are required on limited collector
roadways. 16 foot wide landscaped medians are required on major collector and
minor arterial roadways. 20 foot wide landscaped medians are required on
principal arterial roadways. All median widths are included in the pavement
width as shown on the typical sections.
Per the Town Engineer.
October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-13
11
04
Exhibit 6
LIMITED COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION
Qz'O
2m
Q
October 3, 1996
Article III, Page 3-16
i
0
Exhibit 7
MINOR COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION
-7N/7 M/Zl
�f
z
Q
Q
An
_Q
11
Li
N
"
< 0
a
J �
m
Q J
H Q
f]
V
W
V
N
F
K
W 0
O
Q
of
00ui
W
W W
1
Ql m z
~
Q Q ui
J
O
Z Z j
J W
Q O
O
O W
~ (N
W
OLi Uj
O
Li Uj W
> > O
60
m
O O W
d
to
V U
0a
aaa
\.<
�.
V O
O
O
�m
ti
O
Ir
October 3, 1996
Article III, Page 3-17
Exhibit 16
SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
IS' 5TRFFT �rl c
Ef
SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS
CENTER OF LANE
(.. 5 FEET HIGH)
11
TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH)
20
25
3O
35
40
45
50
55
D
240
JOO
380
470
580
710
840
990
Eq
October 3, 1996
Article III, Page 3-27
. 08/15/02 10:23 $480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 001/007
0
JORDEN
BISCHOFF
MCGUIRE
&ROSE
P.L.C.
LAW OFFICES
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
RECEIVING
PARTY
TO: Sue Stein
FROM: Douglas A. Jorden
DATE: 8/15/2002
FIRM NAME
Town of Fountain Hills
TIME: 10:02 AM
FILE NO: 7650.001
7272 E. INDL4N SCHOOL RoAD, Sutra 205
ScoTTsD,kLF, AR1z0NA 85251
TELEPHONE: 480-505-3 900
FACSrMILE: 4 80-505-3 901
DOUGLAS A. JoxDEN
DiRzcr L xE: 480-505-3909
e-mail: atty@azlanduse.cam
FACSIMILE
NUMBER
480-837-3145
We are transmitting 7 page(s), including this cover page. Please call (480) 505-3900 to
acknowledge receipt of this facsimile or to report transmission failure.
COMMENTS:
Sue
Please put a copy of Mr. Jorden's letter in each Council member's box and distribute to staff
members listed as carbon copies. Thank you for your help.
Tammy
Original ®will not follow.
Original will follow by ❑ regular mail ❑ overnight mail ❑ messenger.
Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from the nature of the transmittal, the information contained in this
facsimile message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by
telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U. S. Postal Service. Thank
you.
08/15/02 10:23 %Y480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF
12002/007
7272 E. INDIAN SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 205
JORDEN SCOTTSDALE, ARUONA 85251
B I S C H O F F TELEPHONE: 480-505-3900
FACSIM i LE: 4 80-5 05-3 901
M C G U I R E DOUGLAs A. JORDEN
& RosE
P.L.C. DIRECT I.1NE: 480-505-3909
o-mail: atryCdAzlanduse.com
LAW OFFICES
August 15, 2002
Mayor Jon Beydler
Town Council
Town of Fountain Hills
16836 E. Palisades Blvd.
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
Re: Siena Madre Estates — Phase I Preliminary Plat
Dear Mayor and Council:
I represent Bob Prather and Janice Abramson, who reside on Siena Madre Drive and
Tepic Lane located to the west of a proposed subdivision known as Sierra Madre Estates — Phase
1 (the "Proposed Subdivision"). Ms. Abramson and Mr. Prather both travel on Sierra Madre
Drive on a daily basis and have a personal interest in the safety conditions of that road. Because
the preliminary plat for the Proposed Subdivision does not comply with the Subdivision
Ordinance of the Town of Fountain Hills (the "Subdivision Ordinance"), we urge the Town
Council to either send this matter back to the Planning and Zoning Commission or to deny the
request for approval of the preliminary plat. The balance of this letter will explain the reasons
for this request.
ALL SUBDIVISIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
The Subdivision Ordinance, Section 205.C. 5, 6, 7 sets forth the criteria for the Council to
use in deciding whether to approve, conditionally approve or deny a preliminary plat:
5. The Town Council shall consider the preliminary plat and the Subdivision
Technical Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission requirements
and recommendations. If satisfied that all objectives and requirements
of this Ordinance have been met, the Town Council may approve the
preliminary plat and make a notation of the Town Council's approval on
the copy retained in the permanent Town Council file.
6. If the plat is generally acceptable, but requires minor revisions, the Town
Council may conditionally approve the preliminary plat and the required
08/15/02 10:24 $480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 003/007
Mayor and Town Council
Town of Fountain Hills
Sierra Madre Estates
August 15, 2002
Page 2
revisions will be noted in the minutes of the meeting. At the direction of
the Town Council, the plat may be approved subject to the revisions in
accordance with the stated conditions.
7. If all of the objectives and requirements of this Ordinance have not
been met, the Town Council may deny the preliminary plat.
(emphasis supplied)
This same mandate that all subdivisions abide by the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance is
restated in Subdivision Ordinance Section 301, which states:
The purpose of subdivision regulation is to create functional, attractive
developments, minimize adverse impacts on the community, and to ensure that
future subdivisions will conform to the community's expectations. To
accommodate this purpose, all subdivision plats shall conform to the following
standards which are designed to result in a well -planned community without
adding unnecessarily to development costs.
(emphasis supplied)
It is clear beyond argument that if a proposed subdivision plat does not meet ordinance
requirements, the Town lacks the ability to approve that plat.
THE TOWN LACKS THE DISCRETION TO CHANGE THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE'S SPECIFIC SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 305 of the Subdivision Ordinance sets forth the design criteria for streets.
Subsections 7 and 9 of Section 305.D. are important to the current issue, they state:
7. Street intersections with more than four legs and Y-type intersections
where legs meet at acute angles shall be prohibited. Intersections on the
inside of horizontal curve on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be
avoided, unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer (See Exhibit
13).
9. All street intersections shall be designed to meet minimum sight distance
visibility requirements (See Exhibit 16).
(emphasis supplied)
08/15/02 10:24 *&480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 004/007
Mayor and Town Council
Town of Fountain Hills
Sierra Madre Estates
August 15, 2002
Page 3
The importance of the highlighted language in Subsection 7 is that the Subdivision Ordinance
allows the Town Engineer to make exceptions to certain requirements. With respect to the
Proposed Subdivision, the intersection of Princess Drive and Sierra Madre Drive is on an inside
curve. Thus, the Proposed Subdivision would not be allowed "unless otherwise approved by the
Town Engineer," which is obviously the case in this instance. In contrast, Subsection 9 requiring
specific sight distances allows no such flexibility and refers to Exhibit 16 for the required
minimum sight distance. A copy of Exhibit 16 is enclosed as Attachment No. 1. Exhibit 16
tells us that the appropriate minimum sight distance is a function of the traffic speed. The traffic
speed counts performed by Town Staff (see Randy Harrell memo dated June 4, 2002),
establishes that the 85`h percentile speed ranges from 38 to 45 miles per hour. The Town's
consultant, Burgess & Niple, clearly states in its August 9 report to the Town that a 40-mile
design speed is required.' The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 580 foot sight distance for the
new intersections created by the Proposed Subdivision, and this distance cannot be changed by
the Town.
THE TOWN LACKS THE DISCRETION TO SUBSTITUTE AASHOTO
REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
In its August 9 letter, Burgess & Niple seems to suggest that the appropriate sight
distances should be based upon the American Association of State Highways and Transportation
Officials ("AASHTO") Geometric Design of Highways and Streets ("GDHS'�. That suggestion
fails to take into account the Subdivision Ordinance. As the Town Council has no ability to vary
the explicit requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, the proper standard is not AASHTO, but
what is explicitly required by the Subdivision Ordinance. In its August 9 letter, Burgess & Niple
compares the sight distances provided by the developer to the AASHTO requirements and
concludes that additional grading would be required to meet AASHTO. But, the Burgess &
Niple letter fails to address what would be required to meet the Subdivision Ordinance.
Attachment No. 2 to this letter is page 4 of the Burgess & Niple letter, modified to show the
Town requirement (580 feet) and the sight distance deficiency. By way of example, consider the
left turn from Princess Court. Attachment No. 2 shows that the developer has provided 380 feet
of sight distance, AASHTO requires 490 feet (and more grading), and that the Subdivision
Ordinance requires 580 feet. Thus, the plans for the Proposed Subdivision fail to meet
ordinance requirements by 200 feet. This is just one example —see Attachment No 2 for
more.
it has been suggested that the warning signs are sufficient to remedy the sight distance
deficiency. This is incorrect for at least two reasons. First, it is not allowed by the Subdivision
Ordinance. Second, while warning signs such as the ones proposed may be appropriate for
trying to make existing unsafe conditions safer, it is poor planning and poor policy to create a
1 Suggestions that a lower design speed be used are inconsistent with the facts and industry
practice.
08/15/02 10:25 V480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF
2 005/007
Mayor and Town Council
Town of Fountain Hills
Sierra Madre Estates
August 15, 2002
Page 4
new, unsafe condition and then attempt to remedy these newly -created conditions with warning
signs.
CONCLUSION
I look forward to discussing this matter with you further this evening. I apologize for the
delay in getting this letter to you, but since the Burgess & Niple report and other materials have
only been recently released to the public, I'm sure that you appreciate that it took us time to
consult with our own traffic engineer on these issues. Regardless of the timing, I believe that we
all agree that the safety of existing and future town residents must be the Town's number one
priority. What we ask is simple: the Town to follow its own Subdivision Ordinance.
While the Town Council may ultimately decide to amend the Subdivision Ordinance to
provide for less -safe sight distances, that is not the issue before the Town Council this evening.
And, from a policy perspective, it is hard to understand why the Town Council would want to cut
corners and ignore the Subdivision Ordinance simply to facilitate a particular configuration for
this developer. Simply put, the Town Council is under no obligation to approve a plat that does
not meet Town requirements. Indeed, the Town Council is obligated to not approve the plat. If
that necessities the developer returning to the drawing board and losing a lot or two, or spending
a bit more money, so be it. We do not quarrel with the notion that if a proposed subdivision
meets all of the Town's requirements, then the subdivision should be approved. But, the rule
should apply equally both ways. If the subdivision does not meet the Town's requirements, it
should not be approved.
Sincerely,
Do 1 rden
DAJ/tj h
Enclosures
cc (w/encl.): Sintra Hoffman
Bill Farrell
Tom Ward
Randy Harrell
Jesse Drake
Bob Sternfels
Bob Prather
Janice Abramson
f:\dati\wpdocs.daj\7650.001\Council lcncr 081502.doc
08/15/02 10:25 V480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF 1j006/007
18' STREET
10' DR/ VEWA Y
CURB L INE
CEO
(3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Exhibit 16
SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
ORI VER S EYE U)
>H K O
-AREA MUST 8E CLEAR OF SIGHT 08STRUEIIONS
_ ,__CENTER OF LANE
(J. 5 FEET HIGH)
October 3, 1996
Article III, Page 3-27
08/15/02 10:25 %Y480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 007/007
August 9, 2002
Page 4
ATTACHMENT NO.2
As can be seen above, the Subdivision Ordinance's sight distance requirements for
passenger cars is more than required by the 2001 AASHTO GDHS for each case.
3—Review t/se developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and
Town required street/driveway sight distance,
The developer's plan/profile's grading for the above referenced street/driveway sight
distances were reviewed and were compared to the AASHTO requirements for a 40-mph
design speed and are as follows:
Lots 1 and 2 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
Right rum from the driveway
Lots 3 and 4 Driveway
Left turn from the driveway
Right rum from the driveway
Available/
�w�J
Provided
A6?u1reJ
(feet)
500
590
380
s90
380 58d
380 Sfso
AASHTO Def lrlelc/
Required
(feet)
445 60
385 ZOD
490 Z o0
385 Zoo
Princess Court
Left turn from Princess Court 380 5:Fo 490 Z00
--�� Right turn from Prince s Court 266 526 � 385
- �1 0,5 % 510,Q}} /17 DAF ��?o�Z il 46E /A1 rt-�SKrro J
The available sight distance for a left turn from the lots 1-2 driveway is 500 feet. This
meets the AASHTO requirements based upon a 40-mph design speed. For right turns from
the driveway, no grading was needed in order to obtain the 380-foot sight distance. In
order to provide the minimum 385-foot sight distance as required by AASHTO, grading.
may or may not even be needed.
For the lots 3-4 driveway, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to
obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has -already
been shown may or may not even be needed to provide the minimum AASHTO sight
distance requirements for a 40-mph design speed listed above.
For the left turn from Princess Court, the. proposed plans show that grading is required in
order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has
already been shown will be needed to provide the minimum 490-foot sight distance listed
above. For the right turn from Princess Court, the required AASHTO sightline distance of
385 feet ends in the intersection of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The alignment of this
sightline intersects the existing north side curb and gutter just west of Golden Eagle
Boulevard. The area within this sight triangle shall be clear of any obstructions. Based
upon a field visit and record drawings, the intersection sight distance can be obtained with
the removal and or relocation of existing vegetation. Also, the developer is providing
advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching the proposed Princess Court in each
direction.
Burgess & Niple
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Town of Fountain Hills Town Council
FROM: Denise Ruhling, Plannef7ve-7—
THROUGH: Jesse Drake, Interim Community Development Director
DATE: August 15, 2002
SUBJECT: Request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow outdoor "deli" seating
and a change of store operating hours to 5:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. Case number
SU2002-05
This is a request to allow Fry's Food and Drug to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and
to allow a change in the store opening from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (making store hours 5:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m.) at 14845 E. Shea Boulevard. See attached Staff Report for additional information.
E*
M
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
August 8, 2002
CASE NO: SU2002-05
LOCATION: 14845 E. Shea Boulevard "Eagle Mountain Tract C-3, a portion of parcel 1.
REQUEST: This request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow outdoor "deli"
seating and a change store operating hours to 5:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m.
PROJECT MANAGER: Denise Ruhling, Planner
DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT: W. Ralph Pew/Pew & Lake, P.L.C.
OWNER: Fry's Food & Drug Stores
EXISTING ZONING: "C-1"
EXISTING CONDITION: Commercial
LOT SIZE: 20.43 acres or 890,344 square feet
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
NORTH: Vacant Multi -Family; zoned M-1 and Residential existing homes; zoned
,%W "R 1-35"
SOUTH: Firerock Golf Course existing; zoned "OSR"
EAST: Firerock Driving Range existing; zoned "OSR"
WEST: Firerock Golf Course existing; zoned "OSR"
SUMMARY:
This is a request to allow the applicant to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow
a change in the store opening from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (making store hours 5:00 a.m. to 11:00
p.m.). The existing facility is the major anchor for the shopping center a 237,675 square foot
building with adjacent buildings to accommodate complimenting business. The site is 20.43 acres
with lot coverage of 405,930 square feet or 45.5% (includes all proposed buildings) with allowable
lot coverage of 534,206 square feet or 60%. Required parking, for entire site, is 332 spaces
provided parking is 445 spaces. Required parking for Fry's only is 218 provided parking is 317.
The proposed Outdoor seating will be approximately 200 square feet located on the south side of
the building on the existing patio/sidewalk area. A proposed wrought -iron fence will enclose the
area allowing ingress and egress to the seating area only from within the store. A proposed trellis
will provide shading of the area. This proposal satisfies all ADA requirements for access to both
the store and parking.
EVALUATION:
Per Section 12.04 Outdoor seating areas and Operation of commercial or professional activities
M
Guest House Case Number SU2002-04
between eleven p.m. and seven a.m. are subject to Special Use Permit in the C-1 zoning district.
This property is buffered from residential housing by Firerock Golf Course (south, east and west)
and Shea Boulevard (north). The nearest residence is located more than 400 feet from the lot line
of the shopping center. The proposed outdoor seating is located more than 150 feet from the lot
line and is completely contained upon the pad of the existing Fry's store. Hours of operation will
not negatively impact the surrounding residential by creating significant noise or light intrusion.
Approval of the operating hours will follow current trends of opening for other food stores in the
Fountain Hills area. Currently Fountain Hills Basha's opens at 6:00 a.m. and Safeway at 5:00 a.m.
The proposed seating area will provide a "sidewalk cafe" atmosphere to the deli area allowing
residents the opportunity to enjoy a cup of coffee, bagel, donut or sandwich while relaxing or
chatting with friends.
The proposed operating hours will allow early morning shopping for those on their way to/from
work or the early riser wanting to beat the heat or traffic. The proposed hours will not negatively
affect traffic, just the opposite is likely with the convenience of early delivery hours easing truck
traffic on the main roadways.
The applicant has stated that a presentation was made at the Eagle Mountain Board of Directors
June 2002 meeting and the Board voted to support the extended operating hours and outdoor
seating.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their August 8, 2002, meeting and
recommends approval and staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit for case number
SU2002-05, "Fry's Food and Drug Store Outdoor Seating and Extended Operating Hours".
Page 2 of 2
i
�oJvT1IN gr,
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Date Filed n
FFaepPaidC��� ,��yAccepted By
� -1 -r
Type of Special Use Requested Special Use Permit to allow a small butloor seating
area adjacent to the Deli Department and to change the hours of operation
to be 5 a.m. to 11 p.m.
Address of Subject Property
Zoning
14845 East Shea Boulevard, Fountain Hills, AZ $5268
Legal Description: Plat Block Lot(s)
Eagle Mountain Tract C-3 A part of Parcel 1
Applicant
Day Phone
W. Ralph Pew/Pew & Lake, P.L.C.
480/461-4670
Address
City
ST Zip
10 Wpst Main Street
Mesa
AZ 85201
Owner
Day Phone
Fr 's Food & Drug Stores
623/907-1788
Address
City
ST Zip
9th Avenue
Tolleson
AZ 85353
Signature o ner
I HERBY AUTHORIZE (Please Print)
Date
/j
W. Ralph Pew/Pew & Lake, P.L.C.
6-4-02
TO FILE THIS APPLICATION.
Subs eg and sworn before me this S- day of June 2XD9X.-•
My Commission Expires 2dv
Notary Public OFFICIALSEAL
DESIREE FLORES
Public - State of Arizona
C-OD
A I COPA COUNT Y Ye
� N 4Notary
25 2003
Submittal Requirements (attach additional sheets):
1. Mailing labels (2 sets) with names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the external
boundaries of the subject property and a map showing the 300 foot radius from which the names and
addresses were derived.
2. 15 full size folded prints (preferably 24"X36") of the site plan showing minimum zoning requirements and
the proposed development if the Special Use Permit is granted, as well as the exterior elevations.
3. 1 8.5" X 11" photostatic reduction of each of the above referenced exhibits.
4. Describe the proposed use, the operations of the use, and the facilities proposed for the land use.
5. A narrative describing any adverse impact the proposed land use may have on the surrounding
properties and on the neighborhood and what steps will be taken to avoid these adverse impacts.
TFH Case Number
ree Schedule Attached
wym Ur ruumAn r1U.-
J U N 1 8 2002
Narrative Report
Special Use Permit
For
Fry's Food and Drug Store located at Shea Boulevard and Eagle Mountain
Parkway Fountain Hills, Arizona
June 5, 2002
Fry's Food and Drug Store ("Fry's") respectfully requests that the Town of
Fountain Hills approve a Special Use Permit for the recently opened Fry's at the
corner of Shea Boulevard and Eagle Mountain Parkway to allow the following:
1. Authorization for a small (approximately 200 sq. ft.) outdoor seating
area adjacent to the Deli/ Bakery portion of the Store.
2. Change in the hours of operation to allow the opening of the Store
at 5:00am.
Sections12.04 (C) and (D) of the Town's zoning code require the approval of
a Special Use Permit by the Town Council for these uses.
The request for outdoor seating is to allow an area approximately 200 sq. ft.
in size to be located adjacent to the Deli/ Bakery area of the Store. This area will
be surrounded by a wrought -iron fence so that the only ingress and egress to the
seating area would be from within the store. The seating area will be covered
with a trellis. The seating area will contain a few tables and chairs so that the
customers can enjoy the outdoor seating atmosphere and relax while having
coffee and other food items available at the Deli and Bakery.
Since the opening of the Fry's store at this location, Fry's has determined that
many of its customers prefer the early morning hours for an opportunity to
complete food shopping and to pick up needed items. Some of Fry's customers,
just like the customers at Basha's and Safeway within Fountain Hills, prefer early
morning shopping. The Basha's in Fountain Hills opens at 6:00 a.m. and the
Safeway opens at 5.-00 a.m.
The two purposes for which the Special Use Permit is requested will not result
in a condition on the property that would be inimical to the health, safety, peace,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. In fact,
providing for outdoor seating and the 5:00 a.m. opening will increase the comfort
and convenience of residents in the area that shop at Fry's. There should be no
negative or adverse impact resulting from a few people sitting outside the Deli/
Bakery area enjoying the atmosphere and relaxing while having coffee, bagels,
pastries or a sandwich. The outdoor seating area will add a personal/ pedestrian
element to the project.
5 �,t .)LC_-) — U 5
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
J U N 1 8 2002
COMMUNITY DEVELOPI�1E''-'
DEPARTMENT
Page: 2
Opening the store for customer service at 5:00 a.m. should not have a
negative impact on individuals living or working in the area. The number of
customers using the store between 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. is relatively small
and consequently the traffic in and out of the site will be minimal. Between the
hours of 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. individuals coming to the site will not be
creating significant noise or light intrusion into the residential areas in the vicinity
of the Fry's store. The convenience of customers wanting to shop early in the
morning or to pick up items before normal working hours should not be a problem
or inconvenience to Property Owners in the area.
The general welfare of the Town is not compromised or damaged in any way
by allowing a small outdoor seating area and an opportunity for customers to
begin shopping at 5:00 a.m. The store is not located immediately adjacent to any
residential properties and consequently the potential for inconsistent or
incompatible impacts are not present with this Special Use Permit request.
M
M
"a'
■
I--
V W
O CL LlJ
O Q T-
mZ(n
rw
doom
NC�
L6
v
H
m
LtJ -1
Q0 u
C�Q
CL
w f1
zCf)
�( f.1
F-
0—
' m
co
J CJ
z W
O Cr
(n U
I-
v
Z
Q
w
co
Q
w
Q.
Description: Maricopa,AZ Assessor Map 217.30 Page: 20 of 32
Order., 9 Comment:
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
J U N 18 2002
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
11MARICOPA COUNTY
(0 In
m £
N O
� O tf.L �� rw�u•n•+
i •.aq a r i' y DI
S6f""
Y-. ! wtRtyN01 Nf- MN ►Ml8 .0
g
"' K 'O
f #:
. ..SI
(
tl
m
a
3>
!o
im
i
„,
N
w
m
r
m
..
z `
I
_
m
m
\
't
N
z
1
N
A
m m
't
�
\
x m
u
't
i
m
L_.._.._..
I
I
I
i
N O
OD M
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
THE IMIII COPA COUNTY ASSES30W 3 OFFICE WINS NO
CLAIM
BILlITT'fA� NOF�I THEUSE OF
TIE INFONMTION NEIIEON.
m
D
a�
r
mm
� s
3
r
p
n
C
frl Z
0
�
N O
D
i
.
C
•� A' roar .t ; .t
'�.;r •,
I
T
—�
D�
r_d:aSiYGFb.i i t `
! ••AY1}fifi �D..t,P�IL"_••• 1
O O
I to
i-r D
i .aL•�+iji i
r •
'1
m
ti
m m
i
D r
i
i
"� ro ! !
O
���
N C
ism
(..,�
mW
Rl
. 70 i
�,
_
r
1"?f '�rIF 77iY.M.'L `dT•,P.- 1 I I
!zee }
'J Im
V 'D
(�OD
D
, zea !
_ �'
I
W
Co
'I v-.
� W
D
N
�\
N
-I
.•tF$�t�m z �F ; ��. ; 1
� �
1 m r
� �
go
Co
1
0,0
�. '�•
m
,dt�
D
%1
a ! _ �•.�
,.
z
z
o f
.0
Z yzmj "• b Cb 1-m '.t
/•,/'•l
d•�` �.N�
Q - i
T
W
T
v N m/ N m IJ a 2 �.•�•'a�I�'••
• 1 I
Ui m
I I
...
m! ./••
1
CD
NL]t
_--
j
,i �• I y
Sr10..1 NPrS
aff
z —� Z
Qi
--.i
m 1n
�E
n
0
pn
Description: Maricopa,AZ Assessor Map 217.30 Page 3 of 32 Only
Order. 9 Comment:
`er'�I
I
'ya^
f?2Fisa'Fi
j
TZS
'C
'li
y�2�3�
T
NtlT�X3
��ape
F
�E
ems
��
_►?�
y�gb
�,
fig
�
�C%iYS
X_.
yqyC`
ililildil
R
m
0
Z0-EI-90 1IV4113d 3sn IYOUS 801 a31lro'MS SV
z
< <
'S31V]:)OSSV (3731-d''O
*m -1 CM/OV" V3� AVMMNd WLNrw 3 -ZV "T*' W z <
LLJ
IN3WdOI3A3G all
13SOd011d ce aIt
<
of
z o
CL Ply .6
0
rillb r D >si as
uj
a Rr
R h� 1v .1
z
OC
7.1 7.2 (8.)0
I I
I i
1 yvrlpp.�7 [noL-lH��,
35 H Q�J 3'-9"
+10� t.o. wall
FRY 9S
FOOD &DRUG
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA
Project No: 991300
Date: 09 JUL 02 Sheet No:
Drawn: M•L ^ I /_ I
Checked: K.D.R. J
KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC.
74DO EAST McDONALD DRIVE. • SUITE 101 • SCOTTSDALE, AZ. 85250
Phone:(480) 941-1440 Fax:(480) 948-1055 www.kdro.com
+12�5'-0"
t.o. parapet$
+113-4"
t.o. eave
+112-0"
t.o. eave-F
_ +110�' -10
b.o. beamY
+110'-0" 141
t.o. column
t.o. arch
+100'-0"
fin. floor
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
J U L 1 0 2002
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'i
7.1 7.2 8.0
I I
+125'-0-0"�
t.o. parapetY
------------------------
LAG' ERE o DD ELO
_ +11�3-4�"
t.o. eaveY
+112-0-0"
t.o. eaveY
_ +110"
�-10
b.o. beamY
+110'-0"
t.o. column
t.o. arch
+100'-0"
fin. floor
t IUJ —4
t.0. WOII
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILL
J U L 1 0 2002
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'
DEPARTMENT
FRY 9S
FOOD & DRUG
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA
Project No: 991300
Date: 09 JUL 02 Sheet No:
Drawn: M.L. ^ /_ �+
Checked: K.D.R. J
KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC.
7400 EAST McDONALD DRIVE. • SUITE 101 • SCOTTSDALE, Al 85250
Phone:(480) 941-1440 Fax:(480) 948-1055 www.kdra.com
�1
J
Ill
111.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Jesse Drake, Interim Director of Community Development Jb
DATE: August 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Special Use Permit for "VoiceStream Wireless".
This request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow a Wireless Communication Facility for
VoiceStream Wireless consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug
mounted antennas at the Fountain Hills High School, 16100s East Shea Boulevard. Please refer to
the attached Staff report for additional details regarding this request.
11
A
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND STAFF REPORT
August 15, 2002
CASE NO: SU2002-01
LOCATION: 16100 East Palisades Boulevard, aka Final Plat Fountain Hills High School.
REQUEST: Consideration of a Special Use Permit to allow a wireless communication facility for
"VoiceStream Wireless " consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light
pole with snug mounted antennas.
PROJECT MANAGER: Jesse Drake, Interim Director of Community Development
DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT: Morris Mickelson/VoicesStream Wireless
OWNER: Fountain Hills Unified School District
EXISTING ZONING: "R1-43"
EXISTING CONDITION: Fountain Hills High School
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
NORTH:
Golden Eagle Park, zoned "R1-43"
SOUTH:
Single-family residential, zoned "R1-10"
*_4W EAST:
Fountain Hills High School, zoned "R-3"
WEST:
Single-family residential, zoned "R1-6A"
SUMMARY:
This request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow VoiceStream Wireless to construct a wireless
communication facility consisting of a 20'W x 15'D x 10'H equipment shelter and a replacement light pole
with attached snug -mounted antennas.
VoiceStream Wireless proposes to construct a new equipment shelter behind the south end of the existing
stadium bleachers, and provide an underground cable connection to a new light pole that will replace an
existing pole. The equipment shelter will be constructed of concrete masonry blocks painted to the
Fountain Hills High School specifications and will have a chain link roof covering the entire shelter.
Access to the equipment shelter will be through a five-foot wide wrought iron gate containing view
concealing wooden slats.
A twenty -inch diameter ball field light pole is proposed to replace the existing sixteen -inch diameter pole at
the south end of the bleachers. The new pole will be installed at the same height as the existing pole and
will completely conceal the internal cabling to twelve new snug -mounted antennas. The existing lights will
be removed and reinstalled on the new pole. The applicant is proposing to install two sets of six antennas,
one set at a centerline height of 68 feet, one set at a centerline height of 75 feet. All antennas will be snug -
mounted against the pole to improve their appearance.
Access to the site is proposed on an existing service road that intersects with Golden Eagle Boulevard, just
south of the Golden Eagle Park south parking lot.
Although additional antennas could be mounted to the exterior of the pole, the capacity for co -location is
limited due to of the diameter of the pole and the requirements of the internal cabling.
AT&T Wireless has an existing wireless facility in approximately the same location. The AT&T shelter is
behind the stadium bleachers on the north end, and the AT&T antennas are mounted on the adjacent
northernmost light pole behind the stadium bleachers.
The Fountain Hills Unified School District is in support of this application, and no complaints have been
received during the required notice period.
EVALUATION:
The proposed wireless communication facility complies with general guidelines established in the Town
of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance regulations for Wireless Communications Towers and Antennas as
stated in Chapter 17, Sectionl7.01. The proposed facility uses existing verticality, will minimize the
total number of towers in the community, and is not visually intrusive.
The proposal does not meet the ordinance requirement of a minimum 2000-foot separation between
towers, however staff is recommending that the Council waive this requirement due to the limited
existing verticality in the area.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this application on August 8, 2002, and
staff recommends approval of SU 2002-01, "VoiceStream Wireless".
IR
M
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Date Fled I
Fee Pal ( c> C' $$ U U
JAccepted By
Type of SpeclaNse Requested
Wireless Communication Facility co -located on a High School Lightpole
Address of Subject Property
Zoning
16100 E. Palisades Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
R-3
Legal Description: Plat Block Lot(s)
APN: 176-17-300J See attached description on drawings
Applicant
Day Phone
Morris M.ickelson / VoiceStream Wireless
602 410-2210
Address
2601 W. Broadway Rd.
City Tempe
ST
AZ I
Zip 85282
Owner
Day Phone
Ft. Hills Unified School Dist. C/o VoiceStream Wireless
602 410-2210
Addres
1460 l N. Del Cambre
city
Hills
ST AZ
85268
Signature of Owner
1-HERBY AUTHORIZE (Please Print)
Date
Morris Mickelson / VoiceStream Wireless
See Attached Authorization
01-09-2002
TO FILE THIS APPUCATION.
Subscribed and swam before me this day of 19
My Commission Expires
Notary Public
(Seal)
Submittal Requirements (attach additional sheets):
1. Mailing labels (2 sets) with names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the external
boundaries of the subject property and a map showing the 300 foot radius from which the names and
addresses were derived.
2. 15 full size folded prints (preferably 24"X36") of the site plan showing minimum zoning requirements and
the proposed development if the Special Use Permit is granted, as well as the exterior elevations.
3. 1 8.5" X 11" photostatic reduction of each of the above referenced exhibits.
4. Describe the proposed use, the operations of the use, and the facilities proposed for the land use.
5. A narrative describing any adverse impact the proposed land use may have on the surrounding
properties and on the neighborhood and what steps will be taken to avoid these adverse impacts.
Fee Schedule Attached
TFH Case Number
_ � 1
� ti t �CC*--
N
I f 1
p oWti
NOR fit �
g N
—<— _ =MIT% I A"!
g
j
S00
p •GZ� l�a.S9'psE M.S6,81lIS _> \ \ / / �'�
l pp: . J o ggj
h� 3m .4ZS9y\•. G
L3 N
1y aro \ • j � c 9
i�
CD1 liila!
Eli
< Q z U I I $
C,m l
H
a O = a�
t
a 18 1 1
rp a-311if
a.o9\/" \\
zi 0' Spa �� ��F g'�•
b o
4
V
g
O
v
Ell
0.
qg�
Z
-a
z
0
U
W
Z
Z
U:
SO
i
N
N
it
Ln
S
I
I
L.. tl .:
A
a
� �a7
� a
g g-
a' F
q
S
=�
z
� rzW V
,00 k
�I-
M
N
[
� 1
1 t
In
;o �2
2
7<
I
r
�
=off
f
=
59
I
..
fit$
ti
C
p
r �
_ Y
I
I
I
�
5
I
I
r
-
&
f
E
I
r
/
0
°
r
1
&
H
z�
1 0
.001
.9L
.09
a
.o�
O O O
00 O .
4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Julie A. Ghetti, CPA, Accounting Supervisor
THROUGH: Sintra Hoffman, Interim Town Manager 11
RE: Ordinance No. 02-12 Tax Levy
DATE: August 9, 2002
During the 2002-2003 budget process, the Council approved the Debt Retirement portion of
the budget in the amount of $2,226,750. This amount allows for the payment of principal
and interest on all outstanding Town bond issues. Of that amount, $1,390,000 was allocated
for payment of the voter -approved General Obligation Bonds for the street paving project,
the Lakeside open space, Library/Museum and the McDowell Mountain open space
preservation bonds.
The approval of Ordinance 02-12 is the final step in the budget process and authorizes the
Maricopa County Finance Department to levy the appropriate property tax necessary to
make the debt service payment for fiscal year 2002-2003.
Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 02-12.
Note: Based on the final assessed property valuation of $270,602,866 the approximate tax
rate per $100 of assessed value will be $0.5136 or $51.36 annually for a home with a
secondary assessed value of $100,000.
R
ORDINANCE NO.02-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF
THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, SUBJECT TO
TAXATION A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00)
OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE
REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR BOND
REDEMPTIONS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS; ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF
JUNE, 2003.
WHEREAS, by the provisions of State law, an ordinance is required to set the property tax levy for
fiscal year 2002-2003;
WHEREAS, the County of Maricopa is assessing and collecting authority for the Town of Fountain
Hills, the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the County Assessor and
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Maricopa, Arizona;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. There is hereby levied on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of
all property, both real and personal, within the corporate limits of the Town of Fountain Hills, except such
property as may be by law exempt from taxation, a secondary property tax rate sufficient to raise the sum of
$1,390,000 for the purpose of providing a bond interest and redemption fund for General Obligation Bond
debt service for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003.
SECTION 2. Failure by the county officials of Maricopa County, Arizona, to properly return the
delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in the same, or any irregularity in any
proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or invalidate any title conveyed by any tax deed; failure or
neglect of any officer or officers to timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them shall not
invalidate any proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto, the validity of the assessment or levy of
taxes or of the judgement of sale by which the collection of the same may be enforced shall not affect the
lien of the Town of Fountain Hills upon such property for the delinquent taxes unpaid thereon, and no
overcharge as to part of the taxes or of costs shall invalidate any proceedings for the collection of taxes or
the foreclosure; and all acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills,
Arizona, this 15th day of August, 2002.
ATT ST:
Cassie Hansen, Director of Administration/Town Clerk
REVWWED BY
antra Hoffman, Acting o anager
William E. Farrell, Town Attorney
ORDINANCE NO.02-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF
THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, SUBJECT TO
TAXATION A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00)
OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE
REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR BOND
REDEMPTIONS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS; ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF
JUNE, 2003.
WHEREAS, by the provisions of State law, an ordinance is -required to set the property tax levy for
fiscal year 2002-2003;
WHEREAS, the County of Maricopa is assessing and collecting authority for the Town of Fountain
Hills, the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the County Assessor and
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Maricopa, Arizona;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION E There is hereby levied on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of
all property, both real and _personal, within the corporate limits of the Town of Fountain Hills, except such
property as may be by law exempt from taxation, a secondary property tax rate sufficient to raise the sum of
$1,390,000 for the purpose of providing a bond interest and redemption fund for General Obligation Bond
debt service for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003.
SECTION 2. Failure by the county officials of Maricopa County, Arizona, to properly return the
delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in -the same, or any irregularity in any
proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or invalidate any title conveyed by any tax deed; failure or
neglect of any officer or officers to timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them shall not
invalidate any proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto, the validity of the assessment or levy of
taxes or of the judgement of sale by which the collection of the same may be enforced shall not affect the
lien of the Town of Fountain Hills upon such property for the delinquent taxes unpaid thereon, and no
overcharge as to part of the taxes or of costs shall invalidate any proceedings for the collection of taxes or
the foreclosure; and all acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills,
Arizona, this 15th day of August, 2002.
ATT ST:
Cassie Hansen, Director of Administration/Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY
S' tra Hoffman, Actin Town Manager
William E. Farrell, Town Attorney
0
w11 N
o � �
a
ftT. ivo •
that is An""
DATE:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
TOWN of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
August 9, 2002
The Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager
Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner
Case # CFW2002-02; Fill waiver request for 15117 E. Camelview Drive, a
proposed single-family residence.
This is a fill waiver request for approximately 1.9 feet above the ten feet allowed by the Zoning
Ordinance. At the August 8, 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting, the Planning &
Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of this fill waiver request. Please refer to
the Staff Report for additional details regarding this request.
The applicant is aware that this agenda item may be moved to the September 5, 2002 Town Council
Meeting in an effort to maintain a timely Town Council Meeting on August 15, 2002.
16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
August 8, 2002
CASE NO: CFW2002-01
PROJECT
MANAGER: Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner
REQUEST: Consideration of a fill waiver for a single family residence to permit a
retained fill approximately 1.96 feet in excess of the ten foot maximum
allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is located on Lot 33 of
Eagle Mountain Parcel 13; aka 15117 E. Camelview Drive.
DESCRIPTION:
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
EXISTING ZONING:
EXISTING CONDITION:
LOT SIZE:
Mike and Carol Silverberg
Mike and Carol Silverberg
"R 1- l0A"
Undeveloped Lot
16,770.65 square feet
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
NORTH:
Undeveloped residential lot, zoned "R1-10A"
SOUTH:
Undeveloped Salt River Pima Indian Community Property
EAST:
Undeveloped residential lot, zoned "R1-10A"
WEST:
Undeveloped residential lot, zoned "R1-l0A"
SUMMARY:
This is a request by Mike Silverberg for a 1.96 foot retained fill in excess of the ten (10) foot
maximum allowed by Section 5.11 (C)(4) of the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance. The
portion of the proposed fill in excess of ten feet is located under a portion of the rear patio and
master bedroom, at the southeast corner of the proposed building. The total area of fill in excess of
ten (10) feet is approximately 330 square feet in area, and approximately 13 cubic yards of fill.
EVALUATION:
Through the preliminary and final plat review process, the Eagle Mountain Parcel 13 subdivision
lot design was found to be developable without the need of a variance, waiver, or any further
discretionary approvals from the Town. Staff believes there are design options that can mitigate the
need for a fill waiver from Town Council.
The applicant could avoid the cut and fill waiver request by lowering the finished floor elevations
of the home, which would not require the driveway slope to be increased. This option entails
moving the two -car garage portion of the home approximately five feet to the east of the floor plan,
aligning the front of the garage with the access from garage to the laundry room. With this
realignment, the entire home may be shifted five feet to the west, up hill, to set on the seven -foot
P & Z Commission and Staff Report
CFW02-02
August 15, 2002
Page 2
sideyard setback line, which would reduce the maximum fill by one foot. By lowering the living
room finish floor elevation by six inches (one additional step riser), and by lowering the patio finish
floor by an additional six inches, the need for a fill waiver would be avoided. A combination of
these suggestions, among other options, would be relatively unnoticeable to the property owner, and
lower the overall building and wall heights without the need for a waiver.
The primary difference between the alternative option presented by Staff in the evaluation and the
proposed design would be noticeable from the rear of the property, where the two (2) six foot
terraced retaining walls would be reduced by two feet.
RECONEVIENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Town Council approval of CFW2002-02 with a
5-0 vote.
E*
PBA 1 /02
The Town of Fountain Hills
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I For Ue
Case Mla alger: Only
Fountain Hills, Arizona
APPLICATION ._
Area Specific Plan or Change Preliminary Plat
General Plan Amendment Cut/Fill Waiver
Plan of Development Special Use Permit
Zoning Change SU Comprehensive Sign Plan
Variance HPE Change or Abandonment
NATURE OF THE REQUEST:
PROJECT NAME
Mrs. Applicant:`` ,� �''""- ''� V ���"�� Day Phone
Mr.
_ Ms. Address: `�''S C. �E\,M�ct.a� v,c.� City: ESN �,�`� State: P-kZip:
Mrs. Owner:
Mr.
Ms. Address:
City:
Day Phone
State: Zip:
If application is being submitted by someone other than the owner of the property under consideration, the section below
mit be completed,
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
I HEREBY AUTHORIZE
Please Print
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of
FILING DATE:
Application
Page 2 of 7
DATE
TO FILE THIS APPLICATION.
20
My Commission Expires
Notary Public
hl 1 £) J
FEE PAID:
(See Fee Schedule)
I you
ACCEPTED BY:
Case Number
ool
July, 2002
Cut and Fill Waiver Request:
Subject Property: Proposed Residence for Mike and Carol Silverberg within the Eagle
Mountain Community, at 15117 E. Camelback View, Lot 33, within Parcel 13.
Brief Narrative below describes and offers the reason for the request:
Description of the Property: As shown on an accompanying attached photo, Lot 33
fronts Camelback View (north), has adjacent lots on both sides (east and west), and faces
the Salt River Pima Community territory at its rear (south). Camelback View is not a
hillside street, but the street does slope along its length. As seen on the photo (or in the
parcel 13 plan itself), Lot 33 is already the lowest lot on the street. At the street, Lot 33
progresses from a low point of 1600 feet above sea level at its front left corner, to 1609
feet at its front right corner. The lot is 16,700 sq ft.( 110 feet along the street, 150 feet +/-
deep).
Planned Home and Waiver Request Description: As a current resident of Eagle
Mountain at 14739 E. Shimmering View for four years, we have been and continue to be
committed to retaining the value and look of the community. This property at Camelback
f View offers us an opportunity to build a modest "great room, single story" residence,
much like our current house on Shimmering View, but one that can better accommodate
our family needs (3143 sq ft vs. our existing 1875 sq ft). (Please see attached Camelback
house and plot plan).
The single story plan is important to us, hence the selection of a lot that offered that
opportunity. We researched construction rules as best we could prior to purchase, hired
Montgomery Engineering in Fountain Hills to try to position and set the resulting design
consistent with all construction requirements, and wound up with a plan that is compliant
in all regards, except that the "rear left corner" of the master bedroom will require 1 to 2
feet of fill beyond the 10 ft requirement, covering approximately 3% or 100 sq ft of the
3143 sq ft planned home. Please refer to the cross- hatched section provided.
Steps already taken to avoid the need for the Waiver:
With the help of Montgomery Engineering,:
a) we've positioned the house favoring the high side of the lot - the right side - to the
extent permitted (7 ft from the property line)
b) we've lowered the home equal to the low point on the street, approximately 9 ft
lower than the right corner of the property. This places the home approximately a
full story in elevation below the house on lot 34, which is in turn approximately a
full story below the house on lot 35. At this proposed elevation, a front, right side
retaining wall at the street had to be introduced. That wall (see site plan) is
already at the 6 foot level at its corner (maximum allowed at Eagle Mountain), -
lowering the home any further would require a second wall, setting the house
further back and essentially defeating its purpose. Also, at this elevation, the
driveway already has 8.5 to 10% local grades to satisfy the drainage plan; and
again, any further lowering would create greater unwanted entry grade changes.
[In my opinion, a view of the street as currently proposed creates a
pleasant terracing effect between all the homes on that side of the street; whereas
any further lowering of the lowest home (mine) would simply make it look like its
in a severe recess. We started out with the house at the midpoint of the street
elevation span (1604.5 feet), and would up four feet lower to try to avoid the need
for a waiver.]
c)
we've cut an original 3450 sq ft house down to 3143, in order to shorten it's
depth, and move it as close to the street as practical, and therefore minimize
construction at the lower left rear side of the lot.
d)
we've extended the exterior stucco finish on the left rear of the home to just above
grade, to cover any unappealing foundation.
e)
we've introduced steps in the interior of the home and decking a total of four
times from front to back, in order to stay consistent with the slight slope of the
property. Any additional steps would be inconsistent with the single story concept
we wanted at the onset, and need at our age. [As an aside, one reason we relocated
from the East was to eliminate the daily steps associated with our two story
colonial.]
f)
we've kept the height of the home, the pitch of the roof (4/12), and the height of
the roof lines well within the guidelines of the Eagle Mountain homeowners
association; and we've obtained homeowners approval of the design before
approaching the town of Fountain Hills.
With all of the above, we still find that approximately a 10 ft by 10 ft section of the left
rear corner of the house, and an equal sq. footage on the covered deck just outside that
bedroom, will require zero to two feet of fill beyond the 10 ft limit, "from original
grade".
I'm hopeful that given the setting of the lot on the street, its relationship to its higher
neighbors, and the steps and sensitivity we've taken to minimize the issue, will all
collectively yield a positive consideration of this request for the cut and fill waiver.
Respectfully,
Mike and Carol Silverberg
14739 E. Shimmering View
Fountain Hills, AZ, 85268
480-816-6798
L
2uez ua zU oz„b:lBq, KEi RAC m
*#mw
99 C'.
®
�_
_-
$2§
—
-- ®— -
'
a
&
k—
---------
b_�
G
�
---
2k
k
_
_
e
�
c
--
§§
L
�
%k
2
■�
°
n
�
\�
®
---
siE
■■
.9
. �
f.5
t
I
a '
41
r
'A T7':i FVnT7qPP70 PC !9T 7nn'71?qT/±P
m
z9 739vd
I 3\1
FVnT7qPP7q FP'qT 7r)n7 Or) T 1) n
EANew Work as of 7-1-02\Betty\EAA 02- ; SRC Tract A.docPage 1 of 1
Chron 162
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town "uncil
FROM: Randy Harrel
DATE: August 8, 2002
RE: Notification of Acceptance
Grant of Access Easement EAA 2002-07
Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Parcel D-North
The SunRidge Canyon Community Association has granted an access easement in a portion of
Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Final Plat D-North, located at the northwest edge of the Wildcat Court
cul-de-sac bulb, adjacent to the SRP site. The existing dirt road access to the North Heights Dam
crest is actually located in this area, instead of in the adjacent, legally platted 20' access easement
(which is currently vegetated). If and when SRP actually builds their proposed electrical substation
in the adjacent "SRP site", we will need to work out with SRP which easement/area the Town's
dam access should be routed through.
In accordance with our normal procedure, no Council action is required for a grant of an easement.
This memo is merely for your information.
B
att.
cc: Tom Ward
Jim Leubner
SunRidge Canyon Community Association (c/o Capital Consultants)
Quinn Johnson/Suncor
John Rezek/North Heights POA
N
E:Wew Work as of 7-1-02\Betty\SRC Grant of Easement --Tract A (NH Dam).doc
When Recorded Return To:
Town Engineer
Town of Fountain Hills
P.O. Box 17958
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
GRANT OF EASEMENT
The SunRidge Canyon Community Association, grantor, for good and valuable consideration,
hereby grants to the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, grantee, a municipal corporation, its
successors and assigns a perpetual easement for the following purposes, namely:,
An access easement on, over, under and across the ground embraced as described
below and as depicted in Exhibit "A", situated in the Town of Fountain Hills, State of
Arizona.
That portion of Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Final Plat D-North, as recorded in Book
434, Page 50 MCR, and shown as being an SRP access easement; said portion being
bounded by Lot 26; the Wildcat Court right-of-way; and the platted 20' access
easement all within said SunRidge Canyon Parcel D-North; and also bounded by Parcel
2, and the SRP site of the SunRidge Canyon plat, as recorded in Book 406, Page 23,
MCR.
Grantor covenants that grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of this aforementioned tract or
parcel of land; that grantor has good and lawful right to sell and convey it; and that grantor will
warrant the title and quiet possession thereto against the claim of any person whatsoever.
Dated this LL day of
By: JL
STATE OF ARIZONA )
County of Maricopa )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of 2002, by
Vic_ M _1t.>A :51 rn She_
Notary Public
My Commission Expire � IAL SEAL"
R T "OFFICIAL SEAL" L. Hadder
Andrea L. Hadder tic Arizona
Notary Public -Arizona
v Maricopa County County
M Commission Ex ires 11/30 2002 { !res 11�30 2002
RESOLUTION OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
THE SUNRIDGE CANYON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
REGARDING
GRANT OF EASEMENT
WHEREAS, Article III of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the
SunRidge Canyon Community Association (hereafter "the Association") designates the
Association as the controlling entity for the Common Areas, and
WHEREAS, Article II, Paragraph 6 of the Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions of the Association specifically authorize the Association, acting through its
Board of Directors, to grant easements over the Common Area for the installation and
maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities without the approval of the membership,
and
WHEREAS, the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona has requested a perpetual
easement to allow maintenance access to the North Heights Dam,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by a majority of the Board of
Directors of the SunRidge Canyon Community Association, to grant to the Town of
Fountain Hills such easement on, over, under, and across ground described as follows and
depicted in Exhibit A:
• That portion of Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Final Plat D-North, as
recorded in Book 434, Page 50 MCR, and shown as being an SRP access
easement; said portion being bounded by Lot 26; the Wildcat Court right-
of-way; and the platted 20' access easement all within said Parcel; and
also bounded by Parcel 2, and the SRP site of the SunRidge Canyon plat,
as recorded in Book 406, Page 23, MCR.
RESOLVED this 25th day of July 2001, by the Board of Directors of the SunRidge
Canyo
Signed
Jack McNutt, President
On the 25th day of July 2002, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the
County of Maricopa in the State of Arizona, personally appeared Jack McNutt, who
acknowledged that he is the president of the Association and, being authorized to do so,
subscribed and swore to the statements contained in this notice.
2L,
Notary Public
Tom, "OFFICIAL SEAL"
Andrea L. HaddeJ2002
Nola ry Public -Arizona
,ice aricopa County
rt� emr ssio; Ex Tres 1130
My Commission Expires: 0-- _ ,.�;
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
ACCESS EASEMENT ACQUISITION
EXHIBIT "A"
SUNRIDGE CANYON PLAT "D-NORTH", TRACT "A"
PLAT D-NORTH
BOOK 434 /
PAGE 50
SRP SITE
(EXCEPTION TO FINAL
PLAT OF SUNRIDGE CANYON
LAND MCR BOOK 406, PAGE 23)
Rf- S
,\f ICArF Goa / / , / TRACT 'A'
16545 o
RANDY L. j0
HARREL 10' ELECTRIC
$f°Si9,,,d ' \EASEMENT
OCKET 16222\SU IDGE C YON
PG 328 MCR -� / \ R CEL "D-NOMC OOK 434, PAG 0
EXISTING NEW OWN OF FOUNTAIN
SRP ACCESS HILLS ACCESS EASEMENT
EASEMENT 0.052 Acres
7 �
Sb-NRIDGE CANYON so�8i ?.Cb
PARCEL„2„ y �\
MCR BOOK 406, PAGE 23 N, ���.
�� 25
EXISTING
®TowN p�� cEss ACCESS
(oSE]AENT ACQUISITION EASEMENT \ 90 \
(C)/— COMPUTED DISTANCE AS EXISTING
MEASURED PER PLAT D—NORTH, 1' VNAE \
MCR BOOK 434, PAGE 50.
� EXISTING \ \
8' PUE — \
TRACT 'A'
SCALE: 1 "=40'
TE: 6-18-02 27 \ \
28 .
k►.
Chron 161
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Town ncil
FROM: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer + ,"
THROUGH: Tom Ward, Director of Public Wor�B'I1
DATE: August 8„ 2002
RE: Grant of Easement (EAA2002-02)
16646 Laser Drive
Plat 412A, Block 5, Lot 14
0.01 Acres (451 square feet total)
Technology Drive and Laser Drive
R.E. Monks Construction Company, LLC
This proposed Grant of Easement Dedication by R. E. Monks Construction Company LLC,
to the Town of Fountain Hills resulted from review and modifications to the Technology
Drive road design. The existing right-of-way at the northwest corner of Laser Drive and
Technology Drive was partially utilized to construct a 60-foot radius at the new street curb
return. This road design change allows the long wheel -based heavy equipment vehicles
to make a safe southbound to westbound turn onto Laser Drive from Technology Drive,
The use of the existing right-of-way at this corner creates the need for this easement,
which grants the Town permission to use this area (Exhibit B) for the purposes indicated.
The Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the Civil Improvement Plans
related to this project, which include the new curb return at the northwest corner of Laser
Drive and Technology Drive. The Engineering Department approves this Grant of
Easement.
In accordance with our previous practice, no Council action is required for a grant of an
easement. This memo is merely for your information.
lib
cc: R.E. Monks Construction Company, LLC
Attachments
GAEasement Memo\EAA02-02 R.E. Monks - Grant of Easement Staff Memo.doc
When Recorded Return To:
Town Engineer
�.. Town of Fountain Hills
P.O. Box 17958
Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
GRANT OF EASEMENT
R.E. Monks grantor, for good and valuable consideration, hereby grants to the
Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, grantee, a municipal corporation, its successors
and assigns, and to public utilities, a perpetual easement for the following
purposes, only:
Maintenance and repair of curb and gutter, signage, and overflow
street drainage.
on, over, under and across the ground embraced within the aforementioned plat
as described in Exhibit "A" and as depicted in Exhibit "B", situated in the Town
of Fountain Hills, State of Arizona.
Grantor covenants that grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of this
aforementioned tract or parcel of land; that grantor has good and lawful right to
sell and convey it; and that grantor will warrant the title and quiet possession
thereto against the claim of any person whatsoever.
Dated this 61 day of 2002.
By:
STATE OF ARIZONA )
County of Maricopa )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BE before me this day of
200211by wiga
OFFICIAL SEAL d / "�
MARIBETH KLASEN Notary Public
Notary Public - Swo o1 Anon
My %R&=t s 23 ' 1' D 5
Subject: DEDICATION EXHIBIT
Job No.: 81561097
PLAT 412—A w
BLOCK 5 o
LOT 14
0
w
1" = 40' PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL, SIGNAGE, 0
DRAINAGE AND REPAIR
C�
o O
o —I
o O
o N
POINT OF POINT OF R��opo U
COMMENCEMENT BEGINNING o w
_ N 90'00'00" E 110.00' — 2
LASER DRIVE
8211 SOUTH 48TH STREET
PHOENIX. AZ 85044-5355
PH: (602] 438-2200
FAX: (602] 431-9562
- ENGINEERING . PLANNING .
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE .
WATER RESOURCES .
. SURVEYING . TRANSPORTATION .
Q:\81561097\FIELDSUR\DWG\DED EXHIBfT.DWG
Prepared BY: MJP Date 5/21 /01
Checked By: JAE
Sheet No: 1 of 1
zoo [A ONI'9KILI[1SN00 DRIKV.LS 6096 T£b Z09 XV,4 OZ:ZT 211L ZO/TZ/40
Am
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OF
GRANT OF EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED
A PORTION OF LOT 14, BLOCK 5 OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ARIZONA FINAL PLATNO. 412-A
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 158, AT PAGE 20 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14;
THENCE NORTH 90000'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 14, A
DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE
POINT OF CURVATURE FOR A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 62.83 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00000'00" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 14, A
DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE FOR A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90000'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90000'00" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 14, A
DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 258 SQUARE FEET OR 0.01 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
I -A N D S!/
\\F�CATF�
C9 �� U c
O V 33321 O
w MICI-iAEL J. :17
oPS
PUMMERf/21/ �1
Q:\81561097\FIELDSUR\DOCS\LOT 14 ROW DED-LEGAL.DOC
£00o �NI'9NILII1SN00 DFUNKIS 6096 T£b Z09 XVJ OZ:ZT Hf1J. ZO/TZ/SO
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR BEYDLER AND
TOWN TOWN COUNCILMEMBERS �'" n ��6/✓
FROM: SUSAN STEIN, ASSISTANT C
DATE: AUGUST 9, 2002
RE: WEEKLY ACTIVITY REPORT
An e session will be held August 12, Monday evening, at 5:00 p.m. followed by a public
meeting regarding Sierra Madre at 6:30 p.m. PLEASE NOTE: Dana's report, located
in your council packet, contains relevant information for Monday's meeting and for
Thursday's Council meeting.
It appears that the retreat dates of October 4 and 5 will work for everyone. Unless we
hear otherwise, these dates will be firmed up at the beginning of next week. George
Cappannelli has been selected as facilitator, and he has agreed to provide his services pro
bono. Should any of you like to view a videotape of Mr. Cappannelli's company, please
see me.
Tim Pickering has signed the employment agreement and the escrow agreement. His
start date is September 16th. He plans to come to Fountain Hills once before his start date
to house hunt. He and Stacey will be here from August 21-28 for that purpose. Tim
plans to attend the League Conference during that time.
The afternoon and early evening of Tuesday, September loth has been designated for
the finalist candidate interviews for attorney services with councilmembers, and panel
attorneys. Please mark your calendars. This meeting is anticipated to run for 5 hours (45
minutes for each interview and 15 minute break).
I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that meeting rooms at Town Hall
must be scheduled through the Town's scheduler to avoid conflicts and confusion.
Should you wish to schedule a meeting in one of the meeting rooms, please designate the
date/time/place of the meeting room and request to be included on the scheduler.
R
f
Town staff held a public meeting on Wednesday with the Trevino Drive residents to
listen to their concerns. This report was emailed to you under separate cover.
Parks and Rec met with town veteran groups regarding the Veteran's Memorial. An
estimate will be available within a few weeks. Planning for Sept. 11 memorial
ceremonies have begun, and the groundbreaking for the Memorial has been planned for
this date.
Repairs to the aerators at Fountain Lake should be finalized next week, which will
improve the current odor level that occurs seasonally. Several areas, including behind
Plaza Fountainside, have been hydroseeded to promote turf growth.
Tom Ward, Don Clark and Mark Mayer met with Ron Huber, Superintendent of the
Sanitation District, regarding his desire to upgrade his current permit to distribute effluent
water to various users. Currently effluent water is used at all of our parks except Four
Peaks. Under the rules for the new permitting, each effluent user is required to submit
their own permit to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality — Water Permits
Section. Under the permit, signage must be erected that informs the public that the water
being utilized on the site is effluent. Each of the parks that utilize effluent water has the
appropriate signage.
Mountain plat review is ongoing. Meetings are held bi-monthly with MCO to prioritize
the parcels and keep up with their time schedule. The first submittal for Town center III
will be submitted this month. Target is on track to open in October 2002. A press release
will be seen in the Times next week regarding the completion of the Shea Blvd.
microsurfacing and striping project, close to the Target grand opening.
Recommendations from the Community Center Advisory Commission will be presented
at the September 5th council meeting. Jim has revised his monthly usage report to more
accurately reflect revenues and usage. Only 4 Saturdays out of the next 48 are still open,
and more than 50% of those booked are for wedding receptions!
Todd and Mary Schlosser met with the high school officials and reviewed security plans
and responsibilities of the resource officers. There are 12 new video cameras installed to
monitor 24-hour activity.
Rural Metro's July report can be summed up as follows: Total calls 293, cancelled prior
to arrival 18, emergency calls, 120, non -emergency 155. Average rsponse emergency
calls, 00:03:18, Average response EMS calls only 00:03:14. Fire loss potential 0, actual
fire loss, 0. Fire prevention activities, inspections 84, plan reviews 50,
consultation/meetings 33, public education, 12 hours. Should you like a copy of the full
report, please advise.
O,��pIiN 91�t
c �
fsr. wag T
9��rbat iS �,tioo
DATE:
Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS
Community Center
MEMORANDUM
August 9, 2002
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Town Council
THROUGH: Sintra Hoffma i wn Manager
FROM: James B. ill ommunity Center Director
SUBJECT: Revised Monthly Activity Report
The new version of this report separates the monthly activities by user categories
rather than just a simple chronological listing of activities. The categories are the
.. four different user groups we now have: Parks and Recreation; Non-
Resident/Commercial; Resident/Non-Profit — Paid; Resident/ Non -Profit — No
Payment. The purpose being to quantify the uses by each group and to see what
percentage each contributes as it relates to usage, attendance and revenues.
We have just completed this revision process for this new report and wanted you
to see and review it. I think you'll find some interesting statistics such as of our
usage, at least for July, is free, no revenues being generated. By next month, we
want the report to allocate expenses as they relate to each different user group
thereby giving us a much clearer picture of associated costs. I believe this will
help to answer the questions and concerns of Council Member Melendez. Our
Advisory Commission also believes this will be an excellent overview tool once
the expense and revenue numbers are combined not only monthly but year to
date as well.
As I mentioned, we are in the process of refining the new report to make it a
complete picture and as soon as it is finished, we will forward the new format to
Council for your information and review.
13001 N. La Montana Dr. - Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 - (480) 816-5200 - FAX: (480) 837-4452
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
69V>6%6,3,F»6463E4t»69Vi
69
V9V9V5,Vo
V9V9E»F»F»eq,E»E»f»cflv3vq�
viiE»Env3E»vavq,E»v9F»t»6»
F»
O
F-
0
O
°dr
0
to
m
0
o
C
O69
O
LL
O
O
y
T)
O
�
M
/0
V
0000000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
0000000000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
00
0
0
0000
0
0
0
0
O
O
W
O
C
C
O
V>
O
C
O
6%
O
V3
O
63
O
69
O
V).
O
V)
O
Vf
C
V!
C
V!
O
V9
O
V!
O
69
C
V!
O
Vi
O
V)
O
V)
C
Vi
O
V)
0
V!
0
V3
0
Vi
0
V9
0
V!
0
V3
0
V3
0
to
0
63
0
Gq
0
Vj
0
69
0
V3
0
V)
0
V)
0
V!
O
V)
69
Vi
6F9
613,69
Q
uj
Q
V
W
00
N
n
ao
O
(D
N
r
ao
N
ao
M
O
N
r
Ln
r
N
r
CO
N
M
r
N
M
ao
n
N
V
r
CO
N
w
It
r
cm
r
0
r
n
CO
r
00
N
n
CO
CO
r
O
M
c0
r
co
r
n
co
N
v
O
M
O
OD
M�
W
C
W
Z
LU
Q
¢
N
n
i'
N
E
N
°0
r
N
oT
E
0
N
°r
N
N
'r
O
0
N
'r
N
O
N
O
J
__
O
F
Q
r�EEEEr�EEEEE0EENONvvMEEEEv,'tc\-
cc
O
r
r
0
O
r
r
r
r
N
ad
w
m
O
cn
r
r
ar
Q1
dvENNr�v
N
E
o0
v
O
E
�
0
0
0
0
E
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
E
E
E
E
E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
0
0
0
E
O
E
O
E
O
Z
J
O
O
a?
o
m
0
w
0
m
o
m
O
O
w
o
m
0
N
0
N
0
cn
0
w
(A
0
m
0
m
o
O�
o
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
m
(A
w
rn
N=
O
0
O
0
=_
O
0
=_
4
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
N
O
6E
0
0
2
O
O
=
m
C
O
0
m
to
ld
N
l0
U1
.5�
_
C
O
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
0
m
p
0
c0
0_
�0
0
C=_
o
0
t0
__
m
0
N
N
m
m
m
C_===
O
0
0
0
HIM
m
m
==
CO
m
C
0
m
2
m
U
U
U
U
U
m
U
U
U
U
U
U
Y
U
U
m
U
m
m
m
m
U
Y
U
U
m
m
m
U
m
m
U¢
m
m
U
m
MM
y
Z
O
IV
W
W
Wr
r
r
r-
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
T-
r
r
r
r
r
r
.-
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
Z
LL
W
0.
C)
Z
C�
Ci
W
Cc
G
m
p
LU
C.)W
N
LT
C
XO
O
C
XO
C_
X
cm
C
XO
N
0)
U_
O
U
U
2
0)
Q
G��
7
co
CO
O
N
(m
�
m
o
m
m
[$
N
m
o�
m
7
._
O
m
C
te
7
a)
0
m
Y
E
c
v��
t
t
d
m
•—
tm
��
m
m
U
V
O
.�
°3LrYrY'�Yr
(�
V
U
..
'C
V
o
OLUYrU
io
U
L
U
o
L
•-
�wYrUm
'C
U
0_
L
m
U
Lmm,_m
L
r
m
m
0
N
r
O
o�
m
m
U
ac�oc�
coN
r
o
°c�-2
o
r
0
m
m
�
m
O
r
U
a�V�coV
m
._
t
O
r
L
m
m
U)
rn�mV�
O
L
O)
O
amv'v
y
•C
L
U
'ca
m
v
�
m._
L
U
U
aro._
C
L
U
a�m
0naomoco
0to¢ci2a0U)¢U¢Ua.mU¢0toHU¢HamU¢E-YDu)YYHYd¢I-
0•mcaaocaco=mm
ammmmm0comm
OL
CO
(o
0.
cnH
co
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
OR
N
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
W
r
r
M
W
00
OD
OD
M
O
O
M
!
M
i
to
�
LO
R
n
io
n
n
a)�
O
O
O
O
O
Q
o
n
n
n
�
n
i
n
n
n
n
n
n\\\\\\\\\
n
n
n
n
n
n
r
n
n
n
n
Z,
n
I
n
I
n
N
I
n
N
I
n
N
I!!
n
N
n
N
n
N
C
n
N
l
n
N
i
n
N
i�
n
N
n
N
n
N
i
n
N
i—
n
N
n
N
n
N
i
n
M
Q,
n
ca
m
y
0
cTo
0
T
T
coo
y
w
m
m
at$
d
s
T
Tm
N
N
y
T
T
TCC$
T
T
m
T
T
T
T
T
-C
m
m
TC
fm
C
C
0
m
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
d
'
0
m
O
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C,,
0
0
0
0.
m
O
�
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
-m0-0
N
o
0
0
O
2
0
0
IL��2m
L`L
U)2mm
m:
LL
cn��2���F->>�LL
cn
222>
>O
H
N
O
O
N
A
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
000000000
o
n
o
cn
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0000000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
O
M
IT
M
�
M
w
�
W
N
�
N
W
0V
v
ap
W
vQ
M
4
CO
M
00
O
tt
O
E9
O
O
6si
O
69
In
6
In
6
a0
MIn
6
6
6 6
� (a—
6
4
N
Fa-
69
E9
E9
E9
E9
E9
69
6ii
69
—
b9
E9
69
69
69
6!9
69
O
6A
69
E9
V9
69
69
Efl
Efl
69
69
69
69
69
VE9
0
F-
69
�
F•
O
O
QN
m
m
f9
O
O
O
l0
O
O
O
O
C
LL
LL
fA
to
O
O
O
00
N
E9
Or
N
2
_N
E9
E9
E9
E9
000000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
00000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
000000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
F
Z
0
W
0
CO
0
V
0
M
0
0
00
0
00
0
O
W
117
N
O
lq
N
0
00
0
In
0
[t
0
qt
0
CO
0
l°
O
V
lA
r
O
In
W
O
In
u
O
O
Efl
O
E9
0
O
IA
In
O
In
M
H9
W
N
00
v
U')
W
E9
69
69
E9
6A
69
69
69
E9
r2
69
r
69
69
69
69
60
6J9
r
_
W
fA
69
6A
69
r(f?
69
69
(fl
69
69
V!
¢
¢613
W
O
O
r
N
N
CO
N
lA
M
00
r
Ifi
Cl)
CO
M
W
r
60
O
M
N
r
n
09
M
n
V
a
r
00
M
v
r
O
V
O
N
O
M
W
n
N
M
v
M
W
�t
N
r
W
le
O
�
00
V
VZ
M
Q
Q
0
z
C
z
a
a
E
E
E
E
E
°
z
o
o
ca
°o
g
cg
O
O
Nr
r
¢¢
¢
¢
r
ca
r
H
a
Cl)
N
E
r
M
r
E
r
r
O
o
M
NrNN
E
E
E
E
M
rrN
E
E
E
M
F
a
r
M
r
M
E
m
a)
E
E
a)
o
a)
o
N
y
E°
N
M
a)
0
yr
E
cn
y
E
E
M
v
O
E
o
o
m
E
o
0
`m
c`o
E
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
E
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
E
0
v
OJ
c°
E
c
E
0
o
E
E
O
o°
E
0
c°
o
E
o
o
°°°
E
o°
E
°
J
0
y
E
0
E
E
c°
0
ai
vNi
N
0
v0i
v0i
ai
�
0
,E
2
y
0
1
(/)
C
C
'E
u.
C°
C
y
O
y.
as
co
0o�0�0�ac0ca��0ca�a�
a�ma�mc°�cid000mc°o�ao��oi°o�a
mUcnm0cncn0m000Um0UUm
(Am6AmUoo0YUUch50C3
Um0Ym
F
ao
H
z
W
z
w
W
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
W
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
U.
O
U.
O
J
a
cm
N
m
N
t
G
a
U
c
c
c
c
c
'�
a
¢
•LU �
'�
'�
O
Oa
N
0)
C
Y
Y
U.
L
`
L
U
L
`
(0
°'
ca
°'
L
2
L
2
L
~
O
V�
N
�
C
>
>
S-C
0)
F-
a
L
L
L
°
°Q
O
L
L
L
W
co
Q�
07
C
Q
Co
y
O
Co
'+C-..
f0
N
W
Z
Quo
�c
O
O-°UUU
>
WzCO
F-
d
Com
N
a
O
=mc
p
7
7
c
d
ma)
N
m`
J
>
W
O
a)
O
a)
O
O
=
O
oEEE
W
=
i
°
0
`�
`
Q
?
a
E
E
E
a)
i
io
iu
C7
U
E
E
E°
G
a)
Y
0
U
0
d
0
:?
ca
0
rn
�.Y
d
a>)
0
L
a>)
0
UY
a)
Q
0
L
0
UY
m
V
~
°
200072
o
0
0
—
0
0
0—_
C
Y
O
o
000
0
o
a
Cl)co
W
cc
N
a)mm
OYL
.�
c
0)W
O
.0
U)—
n1�m
fd
CC
•�
0
0
CC
0
y
ldm=
C
0y
c0
N
c0m
c0
¢
W
W
O
N
V)
0)
ca
Q7
N
N
i
E
UYYY
N
w
0
CC
co
_
C
C
°_
C
_
N
C
_
0
yYYY
o
(0
(0
f0
O
dQQ
O
o
U)
01
m
m
mr
L
QN
•0
N
t
5
N
d
t
aF
5,
N
°�_
L
N
N
W
Z'
Z
Oaaa
a�
a�
0mcn—m
Z
Z
C
C
N
y
��
>La
d
as
CO
z°
3
5
�ry
j
3
v
m
v
m
U
y
Y
3
0
0
.�
0
0
U
3
o
iA
rn
.�
C7
3
o
V
¢—
:°
—
;°
0
-�
5
:°
:�
o
o
c
3>>>
L
o=
ULLF-U�C�LL
L
0
0
0=
O
—i
O
N
Q
:Q
��JJ
=
O
UY�LLU
._
2
0
z
W
Z
mmmmLLLLLLLLm¢ZZUYLL�LLLLLL60
O
Z
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
i0
N
O
._
2
0
0
0
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
D
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
M
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
W
N
0
N
0
O
O
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
O
O
O
O
r
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
W
F-
a6�oa�oo)rccMMa5izz
OMet
lnn0
O
F
aarnrn�CCC��O)�OrrMst�
G
n
n
n
n
:
N
N
N
N
n
N�
n
n
N
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n^
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
W
T
cc$
T
a)
Z
O
>
ro
ca
>
T
>,
>'
n3
TT>,�
ca
O
T>'T
O
O
O
T�
cc
TT
O
c0
Z
>
Q
TTTT
0f
a)
m
0
U)
T
>,
T
TT>1
N
t0
t0
t0
a)
Co
'O
ca
'O
>'
O
Q
Q
03
'O
R1
�
c0
U
y
T
'�
'O
ca
O
C
N
f�/�)
"�
N
a)
C
f/)
J
Q
G
'O
'O
'O
'O
0
C
a1
'O
f0
'O
(C
'O
N
'O
N
'O
y
'O
(�
C
-O
'O`
f6
ca
'O
N
-
(a
fa
N
N
7
C
N
a)
7
03
7
7
N
a)
'6
0
7
7
7
la
V)
a)
a
0
7
Y
O
Q)
(�
a)
N
a)
C)
a)
N
N
-O
0
C
7
C
7
C
7
N
7
a)
7
Q)
7
Q)
0
7
L
7
L
O
i0
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
la
0
7
L
U-0U)
la
fa
7
�F-F-mF
L
L
7
�
L
F-fn
03
7
F-
O
F-
7
F-
7
F-
F-
7
F-
InWW
F-
F-
F-
F-
.
F-
F-lnfnmfnm
M
0
O
0
O
0
lA
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
N
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(O
O
o
O
0
O
0
O
0
M
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
6
OD
h
M
0
M
O
r
6
4
66
0
0 0
O
CO
N
cn
O
6
6
O
M
O
n
0
0
0
In
a0
N
O
J
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
Q
r
O
to
N
M
n
n
n
It
is
c0
M
_
(A
M
O
In
is
v)
(O
vi
M
0
F
E9
FA
Efl
EA
is
EA
FA
EA
FA
F
d9
69
)n
fA
%
is
vgi
n
to
(»
M
Ef)
V3
6%
(f?
FA
v)
to
is
is
(0
f»
Ffl
is
H%
O
O
to
6s
Efl
69
6s
L
O
o
0
M
m
(3i
Es
is
000
O
N
O
000
O
O
O
00
O
O
0
O
N
00
O
O
co
O
G
0
Lq
C
O
Mr-LO
%u9
MOn
Ffl
(&69
MN
is
co
FA
N
to
MN
6sco
N
Q
FA
0
U.U.
O
O
O
O
O
O
(n
n
rn
O
o
U
w
is
6s
0000000000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f.uu000LrWoO
)n
W
ouioO
',0.
"1
n)n
o
0it0LO0
't
M
LO
LnLO0L000
LOfM
0
06u
6uino
0
Z
000000000
%
to
%
H9
C4
to
69
69
%
WfO
f
A
Ns;;
sMtA
6fs
iito
s
A
w
2
a
�
6
¢
W
O
v
r0It
O
W
00
0
O
W
N
00
n)n
N
Mrs
IT
O
O
N
Cl)
O
(O
O
W
M
rN
O
CO
)nry
to
N
a0
Cl)
Cl)
O
n
00
n
O
nr
Mn
)
n
ao
V
Cl)
N
N
ZV
Q
G
Z
�
Z
ui
QQ
O
O
O
O
O
ON
O
OCac�
ON
O
.6
CM
.6
N�
N
N
O
06
at
0606r
CC
ccir
Er
of
at
cc0i�
—
ccccx
1-r(Eao�
r�mo
N
E
r
CO
N
Cl)
ArEMC
Cl)
o8
M
C
�
)
yu
Er
y
N
U
U
U
OocoEE0EE
rfEan�
Ec
pO
E
i
opE0
0
Cu,
a
—
�
9
o
O
C
O
o
=
ccO
r
'E
0oO
y
O
w
c=—
w
wOO
iUy�6'�mcm
na
�°a�—
oMC
oa)iomoo�ood(o�ooaa@
or000a
�m=
C7M—mco
cm5cncaca
(nM
M
M0WdoM
OHMUmUoUUCacoNt
Z
z
W
w
W
r
>
W
O
o
W
_m
cEcm
U
N
O
o
y
a
o
y
aa)
z
E
E
a)
rnC
cm
c
`°
ai
i
¢
v
O
i
`o
m
me
oo
0)>>>
E
m
g
m
>>>
>
LL
U
rncco'M
YM
f-
ZO
a
>'
CLL
(
m
WM.>
a)
Coo�
'c
-
a
C
w'2
U
W
L
W
N
O
E
E
E
S
C¢
d��
u)
E
E
E
E
0
w
Z
p
p
O
E
0
a)
N
()
N
d
ro
O
a
iC
O
Y
n-a�m�EEE
r
O)
O)
N
o0Lodc0000
a)
as
O
a)
Q
Ox�'�
o
EL2—
o
m
W
o
o
co
a)
,ca
LOUUU
cr
w
O
O
O
a
p
T
co-0coX
-
00000
0
0
0
0
a
Zw—
0
c
:3
o
U)cc-2
a)
my
CD
y
N
¢
:�
m
n
'
r
a)
E
a)
E
co
�;
Y
Y
Y
U
O
O
O
E
a)
E
a)
E
m
O
Y
O
Y
rn
Y
rn
Y
—
F
V
C
C
p
O
U
T
a)
Z
•-
co
O
N
O.
CO
O
m
co
O
p
a
a)
o)
O
c
(o
m
a
a3
a�
cv
m
co
m
p
U)
N
rn
'�
CC
COCISCoco
O
N
N
N
N
V-
Z
w
7
o
o
U
E
N
ccO
n.
vcn
m
(n
3
m
�
E
c>>
a
N��
Naan
?
���3
Eaaaa
co
G
N
�'>�
Co
co
o
o
a)
o
0
o
3
7
o
o
o
L
o
o
o
o
Z
O
d
CO)
o
o
co
2
a)
o
o
3
o
LLmLL.a
Z
o
m
-,711
2
3
Y>adaoLLU-
LL
a)
LLmoCcnxcncnadaULLLLLLLLmoc
Z
O
cOo
z
0
z
�¢F-HwLLCOCC¢x
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
M
O
M
O
N
O
N
O
N
o
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
O
N
O
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
LL,N
co
ao
ao
O)OOO
MM4�)n
)n
co
(OnnaO
co
ao
aoOO
H
Nc\O)OOO��r
of
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ni
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
f
Q
o
n
n
n
n
n
ni
nni
nnnni
nni
i
nni
nr�i
nni
�ni
nni�:i
n
w
nnn
n
G
m
ca
W
co
co
a)
}
T
T
T
T
faA
cT6
cTo
cTE
T
(o
T
(o
T
co
TTTO
T
T
ns
N
cTo
cC
co
co
•p
(To
-p
T
T
T
T
co
(To
J
}
p
(To
t0
c6
N
C
can
C
can
Caaa
to
a7
co
O���y0-0"
>>>�����a�w
wm�ggaaaacn(n
co
co
co
nsaa
Q
aaa
hwmaaa(nv,�
m
d
a)
a)
a)
c
�F-F
d
a)
d
a)
>�
>
>
�F-iL
>
(CO n(ofofn(nfnF-F->�F-�U-U-Wfn(nfnWWf
c
c
c
a)
a)
>�
>
>
>
o
g
c
c
c
c
m
-
d
�
>a)
>a)
a)
N
O
O
N
0)
IM
M
N
O
O
N
00000000000
O
O
O
o
O
o
O
O
o
O
o
0
to
M
o
o
0
CM
0
M
0
N
0
0
J
O
V:i
O
69
O
69
O
FA
O
69
O
69
O
6-i
O
69
O
EO
O
EA
O
69
69
J
F
J
O
M
CO
O
O
F
O
0609,
O
O
CO
�
O
00
C
0
0
0
0
0
rn
Q
O
O
00
O
00
m
m
m
v
0000
0
p
O
p
On
00000
Ooocov
0
o
O
O
LL
Cl)
O
LL
o
o
o
00
LL
64
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
O
U
O
V
O
0
o
000
0
o
O
O
EA
Lo
LO
69
Lo
0
0
0
0
ci
0
O
O
O
OOOOOOOOOO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
OCD
0
0
No
0
0
0
F
Z
0
EA
0
69
0
6l>
0
69
0
EA
0
64
0
69
0
V9,
0
6%
0
69
0
69
O
fA
F
Z
O_
Z
O
I-
N
O
O
W
W
N
W
2
N
h
O
661
W
00
tn
Cl)
OV
M�00000
N
W
n
W
o
0
0
0
0
V
0
U
Z
000
M
0^
ORO
pC
0
-
V,ZN
O
QQ
Q
O
O
O
O
O
c
Q
N
U
U
r
NEnCs
rE
OccE
O
M
O
O
O
E
O
N
nCEs
JC
0D
0)
O
wc
C13
-Ei
=
(j
Q0U
UE�
U)Co0U)U)cC4
UUc
02
Fy,.
F
0
0
0
0
0
Z
Z
r
Z
o
rrM
-r
00
W
W
W
W
M
M
Cl)c;
Lri
LL
O
LL
O
LL
O
*
E
m
rn
0
d
rn
y
c
c
d
m
W
Z
p)
._
co
CA
c'
CC_
a>
E
a)
E
a)2
>
W
w�[Co
��
E�
E�
E
U
O
�?'��°'EE00
>
—
Win¢
o��
o
Cm
c
O
?
a
ca
m¢
o
¢
LL
R
p
C
N
O
C
O
C
d
t6�J=W
U
U
L
X
U
(n
L
X
U
V
w
aLU�
O.
.0
o
2
r�
r
�
a
Z
cncncnCCaILaQU¢a
z
O
Z
ma
E
E
W
N
0
N
0
N
0
92��
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
�2,2m0
N
0
N
0
N
0
F-MQOMCOCO00C���00
N
N
N
N
M
H
N
o
n
n
i
i
n
i
n
n
n
i
n
Z
o
Uaa
W
C]
N
>
J
—
••
c
d
O
Z_
O
Z
<n
>.
C
'2
'2OL
'UO`
'Op
'WO
y
C
C
Q
Q
N
'O
O
lE
N
(C
O
N
N
O
7
0
a
O
.O
d
cncncnHF
7
L
2�32H
H
azccm