Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002.0815.TCREM.Packet
o a that is Asv'" NOTICE OF REGULAR AND EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL Mayor Jon Beydler Councilman Rick Melendez Councilman Mike Archambault Vice Mayor Leesa Fraverd Councilman John Kavanagh Councilwoman Kathy Nicola Councilwoman Susan Ralphe WHEN: THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2002 TIME: 5:00 P.M. (the Council will meet in executive session from 5:00 to 6:30 p.m. at which time the regular session will begin) WHERE: COMMUNITY CENTER 13001 NORTH LA MONTANA DRIVE (*PLEASE NOTE ADDRESS CHANGE) RULES FOR ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL — ADOPTED 1118190 It is the Council's desire to hear public comment on agenda items. As it is important to maintain order during the meeting, please adhere to the following rules of order if you wish to speak: 1.) All citizens wishing to speak must first be recognized by the Mayor. 2.) The Mayor will not call for public comment on an item until after a motion has been made and seconded and the Council has had adequate opportunity to discuss the item. 3.) Please stand, approach the microphone and state your name and address after being called on to speak. 4.) All comments must be directed to the Mayor. 5.) TIME LIMIT — THREE (3) MINUTES PER PERSON PER ITEM. 6.) Statements should not be repetitive. 7.) Persons or groups wishing to make longer presentations should see the Town Clerk prior to the meeting. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL — Mayor Beydler 1.) Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03.A.3, AND A.R.S. §38-431.03.A.4, VOTE TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR: Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the attorney or attorneys of the public body, specifically personal liability of council members; AND Discussion or consultation with the attorneys of the public body in order to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the public body's position regarding contracts that are the subject of negotiations, in pending or contemplated litigation or in settlement discussions conducted in order to avoid or resolve litigation, specifically mediation, appeal and the need for a Settlement Attorney to review a proposed settlement agreement as all relate to Hoffman/Robinson/Knapp vs. Town, et al.; 2.) RETURN TO REGULAR SESSION CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE TO THE FLAG — Mayor Beydler • INVOCATION — Councilwoman Nicola ROLL CALL Town of Fountain Hills Page 1 of 3 Last printed 08/14/02 2:03 PM Consent Agenda: All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine, non -controversial matters and will be enacted by one motion and one roll call vote of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all -,commended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a .'ouncilmember or member of the public so requests. If a Councilmember or member of the public wishes to discuss an item on the consent agenda,, they may request so prior to the motion to accept the consent agenda. The item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. *1.) Consideration of APPROVING THE MEETING MINUTES of July 29 and August 1, 6 and 9, 2002. *2.) Consideration of the PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT for "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. Case number S2002-19. *3.) Consideration of a PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT for "The La Montana Condominiums", a 15-unit multiple family project located at 16734 La Montana Drive, aka Plat 102, Block 3, Lot 9A, Case Number S2002- 23. *4.) Consideration of ORDINANCE 02-11, levying upon the assessed valuation of the property within the Cottonwoods Maintenance District subject to taxation, a certain sum upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of valuation sufficient to raise the amount estimated to be required in the annual budget, to provide funds for maintenance of certain pedestrian areas, parking and parkways, all for the fiscal year ending the 30`s day of June, 2003. *5.) Consideration of RESOLUTION 2002-32 abandoning whatever right, title, or interest the Town has in a portion of the existing 8' electric easement, the 20' effluent line easement, and a 25' wide public utility and drainage easement within the Four Peaks Plaza Plat boundary as recorded in Book 568 of Maps, Page 39 Records of Maricopa County, Arizona EA2002-16. *6.) Consideration of RESOLUTION 2002-33 abandoning whatever right, title, or interest the Town has in certain public utility and drainage easements located at the southerly and easterly property lines of Lot 23, Block 4, Plat 431 (15219 N. Wiley Drive) as recorded in Book 151 of Maps, Page 43 Records of Maricopa County, Arizona - EA2002-14. Michael and Marilyn Grudier *7.) Consideration of RESOLUTION 2002-34 abandoning whatever right, title, or interest the Town has in certain public utility and drainage easements located at the northeast and northwest property lines of Lot 36, Block 1, Plat 505D (16673 N. Boxcar Drive) as recorded in Book 158 of Maps, Page 41 Records of Maricopa County, Arizona - EA2002-15. Ted and Debra Donatoni *8.) Consideration of ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION to accept the proposal for the Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan submitted by Premier Engineering and complete a contract for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 for fiscal year 2002-03. 9.) UPDATE by Councilman Rick Melendez on the North East Advocacy Center located in Scottsdale. 10.) Discussion with possible action regarding MEDIATION. 11.) Discussion and possible action on a MOTION TO HIRE A SETTLEMENT ATTORNEY for purposes of reviewing a proposed Settlement Agreement involving Hoffman/Robinson/Knapp V. Town of FH. 12.) Discussion and possible action on a MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE APPEAL of a portion of the ruling in the case known as Knapp V. Town of Fountain Hills. 13.) Discussion and possible action on a COUNCIL CONSTITUENT SERVICES budget line item. 0 714.) UPDATE regarding the printing of the Compass publication, with possible direction to staff on implementing cost reduction measures. (This item was continued from the 8/l/02 council meeting.) Town of Fountain Hills Page 2 of 3 Last printed 08/14/02 2:03 PM 15.) Consideration of the PRELIMINARY PLAT for the 9-lot, 11.104± acre, Sierra Madre Estates, Phase I, located along the northwest side of Sierra Madre Drive, southwest of Golden Eagle Boulevard, Case Number S2001-16. 016.) PUBLIC HEARING on a request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow Fry's Food and Drug, located at 14845 E. Shea Boulevard, to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow a change of store operating hours to S:QQ a.m. until 11:00 p.m. Case number SU2002-05. 17.) Consideration of a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow Fry's Food and Drug, located at 14845 E. Shea Boulevard, to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow a change of store operating hours to 5:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. Case number SU2002-05. 18.) PUBLIC HEARING to receive public comments on a request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow a wireless communications facility, consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug mounted antennas, at Fountain Hills High School, located at 16100 E. Palisades Boulevard, Case Number SU2002-01. 19.) Consideration of a recommendation to Town Council on a request for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT to allow a wireless communications facility, consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug mounted antennas, at Fountain Hills High School, located at 16100 E. Palisades Boulevard, Case Number SU2002- 01. 20.) Consideration of ORDINANCE 02-12, levying upon the assessed valuation of the property within the Town of Fountain Hills, subject to taxation a certain sum upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of valuation sufficient to raise the amount estimated to be required in the annual budget, to provide funds for bond redemptions, for the purpose of paying interest upon bonded indebtedness; all for the fiscal year ending the 30th day of June, 2003. 21.) Consideration to approve a CUT/FILL WAIVER for Eagle Mountain Parcel 13, Lot 33, aka 15117 Camelview Drive, Case Number CFW2002-2. 22.) CALL TO THE PUBLIC AND ADJOURNMENT. Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431 -01 (G), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters not listed on the agenda but must be within the jurisdiction of the Council. All comment is "subject to reasonable time, space and manner restrictions" and the Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during call to the public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and Legal action. At the conclusion of the call to the public, individual Council members may respond to criticism, ask staff to review a matter of ask that a matter be out on a future aaenda. DATED this 14th day of August, 2002 Cassie B. Hansen, Director of Administration/Town The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call 837-2003 (voice) or 1-800-367-8939 (TDD) 48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in this meeting or to obtain agenda information in large print format. Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the council with this agenda are available for review in the Clerk's office. Town of Fountain Hills Page 3 of 3 Last printed 08/14/02 2:03 PM TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MEMORANDUM TO: The Town of Fountain Hills City Council FROM: Denise Ruhling, Planner ��- THROUGH: Jesse Drake, Interim Community Development Director DATE: August 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Consideration for approval of a Preliminary/Final Plat for "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat This request by La Strada Villas L.L.P. is for approval of Preliminary/Final plat for "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. Please see attached Staff Report for further information. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS AWN STAFF REPORT August 9, 2002 CASE NO: S2002-19 LOCATION: Preliminary/Final Plat "Tokpela" Lot 1 aka 13600 North Fountain Hills Boulevard REQUEST: Consider approval of a Preliminary/Final plat for "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. CASE MANAGER: Denise Ruhling, Planner DESCRIPTION: OWNER: La Strada Villas L.L.P. APPLICANT: La Strada Villas L.L.P. EXISTING ZONING: "R-4" Multi -Family Residential EXISTING CONDITION: Vacant land LOT SIZE: 408,550.93 sq ft or 9.38 acres SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: NORTH: Four Peaks Vista Condos; zoned "R-4" SOUTH: Lutheran Church; zoned "R-4" EAST: La Vida Buena Condos; zoned "R-4" WEST: Villa De Este Condos/Arrow Wash; zoned "R-4" SUMMARY: This request by La Strada Villas L.L.P. is for approval of Preliminary/Final plat for "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. This plan conforms to the concept plan approved in February of 2002 with the exception of trash pick up. The applicant is requesting approval of a sixty (60)-unit condominium project in a R-4 zoning district. The irregularly shaped lot accommodates the sixty units in eleven buildings arranged along a private gated drive. Non -disturbance areas have been identified and placed on the steeper portions of the site. Resident access will enter and exit the development from Fountain Hills Boulevard on the east. The west -side gate will be used for emergency and sanitation access. Minimum unit size is 1,457 sq. ft. maximum unit size is 2,012 sq ft. Parking provided is 137 spaces, or 2.28 spaces per unit and meets all ADA code requirements. TOFH requirements for parking are 135 spaces, or 2.25 spaces per unit. Total lot coverage equals 79,443 sf or 19.4%, well within the allowable maximum coverage of 50%. EVALUATION: The application conforms to the TOFH zoning ordinance requirements for multi -family housing; including, setbacks, lot coverage, open space, and parking. The application conforms to the approved concept plan with the exception of trash pick up. The approved concept plan showed community dumpsters, this plan allows for individual resident containers and pick up by sanitation trucks entering and exiting on Mountainside Drive, as well as Fountain Hills Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed Preliminary/Final Plat is in compliance with the regulations of The Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their August 8, 2002, meeting and recommends approval and staff recommends approval of the Preliminary/Final Plat S2000-19 "La Strada Condominiums" a subdivision of Lot 1, Tokpela Final Plat. N k PBA 1/02 L 0-4 The Town of Fountain Hills For Official Use Only COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Case Manager: Fountain Hills, Arizona APPLICATU Area Specific Plan or Change Preliminary Plate /,,dy� General Plan Amendment Cut/Fill Waiver Plan of Development Special Use Permit Zoning Change SU Comprehensive Sign Plan Variance HPE Change or Abandonment NATURE OF THE REQUEST: 16 PROJECT NAME Mrs. Applicant: Day Phone Mr. Ms. Address: City: State: Zip: Mrs. Owner: 44 Day Phone -Mo" M r. Ms. Address: )nI07 0• � � �� fQ� City: State: Zip: g Y If app/ication is be� ing �6rnitted b}� soleone other than the owner of the property under consideration, the section be/ow must be completed, SIGNATURE OF OWNER` — DATE 4-!1, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE �/ �� TO FILE THIS APPLICATION. Please Print Subscribed and sworn before me this day of _ , 20 0� My Commission Exp�i N Public -111 MyC"n.Ex*AMY r-Auerf1.2iK5r K It ( U 6o 0 00 FILING DATE: FEE PAID: ' L ACCEPTED BY: (See Fee Schedule) Application C, o 0 Page 2 of 7 ClVQi rG( �� / !� -�k,Cas@ Number Zoo 2- /y PBA 1 /02 The Town of Fountain Hills LEGAL DESCRIPTION Flo -e/ Plat Name Block Lot PROPERTY ADDRESS l311m) 4/� #Ak5 41�1 PARCEL SIZE (Acres) �- 3e ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER NUMBER OF UNITS PROPOSED TRACTS — - EXISTING ZONING: !� ¢ PROPOSED ZONING TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MAY 0 8 2002 COMMUN/Ty DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Application Page 3 of 7 Case'Nurh �, 9ae9-crc (ow> .q1 n91-�cra (091) '• a31 99ZS9 VNOZIaV SIIIH NIV1Nnp!il.'� 10Z 311nS '3Av M31AHavd 3 91L 91 4 'AxmmVNrw * orauamoNa ; ,o- IVld IVNIJ a8YAMOS S111H NIV1Nn0!E'N009'Cjbl3dN01M U. 0 wnINIWOONOJ VOVHIS Vl ff a a Lb r _48 yak e• $ ii dg ppY �pD q fr Rip (j $ ^pb I U �yi Ly �1 Fd�{iP� '� b-fit tl]5igr 1. P�A {9i �• 1.z Y'e9 � � q3 sib3q2 a^` 3���b�siC �i E p D d iy 4i 6•p Zr I L :id } a a+i�� ese " E SAS ii A •Y b� C V m U W 0 Y� N � 'i- ,o I 0 J<� Qi4, �[ 0� 0 O < p ?'3 ai9 — Ail Ln x; sf Q - OJ • _ • .. . •, :.• Q a .. • .. a .. ..- O o m 0000 m 0000 O U t� o Q 9$ a: 9c_ 19 u, _! 91 1c is �, $>f iA 89 Is •..... ... _.. ... .,1 •.. 0 C, J m m a e m 0 m V �� If� �� �� N �71 1.i ■i i� M o m J � m 0(a 0 a m e(a a 8 m 31 J < M .Nt O?z b_ ~O - IL � 9F^�71Q • 3a� --- � 'Z3 gum o E Juan �V u o i C o c Y�• Yp •ie6 aaaaaa�a is _a _��� •gooiYYY 0 5f.nb$6:� z F& n ng f<-£��.Y ✓3 ` fi E i � E,' E y 4 Y _Yp ' •- $ 2:S E L "� 9_ E_ S E A g d 8 a E E E A 5 i• = 3 a oo�a=eM N �f3; K= aE�b: $ a :�9a�bEbeg :7 �:„• i o bi '^= Ye~Z3 $s� gg 8.=t8 ix Hs°� �_ c r 3( 1m Y C E ta4.' �� � o g 3 5 g3gb gg � � ° r g @ § :bad EN' a? �py��' � ;� �� 4 mab�r `YES - re b r p _ z E ry y J § b���Y 8 -� Y 4�Vb?i7b=9_'_ s=Z8m7 93 Lt`2Se 2` a e3'� a y$: d5 :Mb a *e '- �' z a� a a o3c:cc3cab 3J8Sa.-a . age �e€:: VJ � J Z J W EE _N Z O 9 H N 00 O a O o Q =r C H O U )au jsansnojX�iobjuoujp :I!ow-o 9999-cw (o9.) oI s.91-cro (090 - toz 31InS '3AV M3y\NNVd '3 9 IL= xi 'r1'Tyl'1►1iM130YNYN * ONtli31�UO/�Ni� 1n0Avl 11Nn - ivld 1v N1! Hay 08Vn3inos SIIIH NIV1Nf10! 'N 009i1 Ol t 101 V13dN01 ' a 10 wnlNIWOONOO VOrli1S Vl ff a Lai /.Js]e Lr0 M _.._.._VNU L eggs-ag (090 x0s uOVL :1iow-a 51N3n35V3 - lVld IYNU OHV�31�108 SIIIH NIYl Nf10� 'N 009C1 aaaa-cra (oat) •ol swl-csa (oa.) 992s9 VNOZIdV 'SIIIH NIY1Nf10� 0310N SV = LA toz 301S 3AV M31nHaYd 3 91[91 � 3 `4 ` Har�,� Nao" l 101 b'13dZI U. O JT'llii•IiOYNrw r OMUR IONi ,o-lo-so H2lV F )�3 V V �9jN1IW Wf1INIW04N0� VaY!!1S Vl S a n , o.war+o.n .rrovrn• .e ee.i I�or..w \ � e '•' .., $'&4 �/ rye. � Q o �Vile 41 •i" - r . �0pll 9=s rl�4r Y� •f \ \�� ..� - '�zl'y � .``' .•l•ryq,� x asp *.{gy ''Ry ql pBeJELL ep a. ar K $ .fll(l y'y� I/•, ` , J J • .toj= x \`, �= C: (3Rx ,•r�'fli• 4 . 6i 4,lPh•' 1 r / Vk, a O Z\`'\ fit' •q i� � r�I R! U - j'Z • eye/ �Si ��q a�_ i } i ` 8 Y, y �� •J i �lpt6t rs5 ` � Jf �1•• 7 \ �, Y A s kz=se 'x ^a s w .A Uk }. �r � V ..lj� x s Si a - ¢- `\_ 3 Itse1. 00 � R s r ie k b �yt�- nre.y j 0C�C�tr�0C7GC1� J v0C7C 15, cr, wuwusn n•a o. Is u lca..s 00 notx,awo6luowD :pow -a $NVId aI1 - IVId IVMJ Oavn31nOB SIIIH NIV1N()0! 'N 009f1 9999-ct9 (oBi•) COI sf91-tfC (OHs) OXON SV O! 99Z99 VNOZIUY 'SIIIH NIV1NnOd 107Z '13lNI�nS7i'3OAVV NMV3171n A*bvOdNI'tl3 39lZ91 t 101 Vl3dN01 LL ION3 O w-IO-90 HaYA�GW09iN0NW wn)NiwoaNOO VOVais VI g `r1 I� c •OO LL - A +---oorz---- J"-8 u-----; E 777 LAC + u SCTL us3 Oil � y .a7KCZ naVrao� � �� $ >s oc s -t om I n c •. oo a °p cv- -- - -- -- - --- mo+oo� 0o tt ccTL m Y .y rr Tt CC6 i_ �i Q Z Q _ J Of O Y O Q J J U— �J�l Z > j W n w Li �o Z Q J Q' O O Q J J W C J j p W — I-J m m W ui s (n' z Q J d Z Q lain Isa.sriDL.(jawo6ju9wp -pow-a 9999-tC9 (099) °w Mi-au (099) 99ZS9 VNOZI8V 'SIIIH NIV1NnOd 90Z 311nS '3AV M31AHdvd '3 91191 A�GWMLNIIWLv �-n °L+awaovNvw * o�aua�woNa SNrld bOOU - 1y1d IVNIJ 0dvn31nO8 SIIIH NIV1N(103 N 009C1 ION sr' mdo ( 101 H13dN01 a O IW -to-90 Hav �• mINUUN00 VUVHIS V'i a o F- Of O O 0 � J I 9[ Z ~= --------------- — o 0 _ Q J J Iy ' CO J Z_ 41 En ck: I(— ------------ W CO ------------ 10 C?= I I tk 1 m �I^I-_�I^ °D ^Ih •.mil ^In�r9i^ I �'' 1 ��^' vN = H NN�!liINn� � 06O �hv'I �Nrt•li INn^lIl 1 C0OD�I�i�HV�0O�iII�IjI�. 11 i-LL H -Y-O 1 !H =�zUj2_ �y I .9a'9 LMITL o aCr M1� 1 oczz ar[ Y n 8g or9z GJ osz aaII - ----,sc¢----- .asrz .osz V 9s Y 0 , g ----------- 19 SZ �� � _- .a9 t9 8 .oczpYt �7 2 o © A. ti L'° °" J:u'Jsa.arel6 iawo6J uow0 :1!OW-a Sw Id a001! - lrld IVM1 OaVATWS SIIIH NIVINnO.1 N 009CI 9999-[f9 (O9s) a' S•Bl-Lf9 (O9f) 031ON SV B9ZS9 '30%vIV 'SIIIH -3 NfJ0! ( lO1 d�3dNOI U. ♦OZ 3tIf15 '3nv /A31nHavd '3 91[9t �• � -+� ' nao � �T'1Ni/�OYN11N OlYtli3NgNi i I0-Io-90� Hav Ax-q vng I wnw wniNiwoallo� vadals vi ff i�------ ------ C3 4D '1 �`oJo�R o " nv Z �z as ou•. Q _ I a • tY �J °• Od • b z Q F- �O 00 Q J J L.� CD I _Z ck� O O J C m L- Of ass u Z } O J <vv J U- Z i1f0 ^ I Q w :f[ OOIf nc m w < LJ lau lsa.s,*LA,awo6luo- :Ilow-a SN0NO3S - 1VId IV021tlN31nOG SIIIH NIVINnO! 'N 009CL —� 9999-Ls9 (00') •,I st91-L" (09t) " O31pN $V' /kN 99ZS9 VNOZIMV 'SIIIH NIVJNf10.! ( 101 dl3dN01 LL YOZ 31,nS 3AV M3AX8Vd '3 91L91 y' 41 >t ^' NMo' �-n -'1�N3i(Aiorlirnw *' uwaaangtta 3 to-10-90 Hatl - Wl11NIWOUN00 corals rl g a FM Sy M.�R 3 O r s z C, d _J m q G CD J O Q J L I I 1aulsa.s�1.�•a wo61uow0 :I!ow-a 9999-Lr9 (091) •a s�91-cr9 (07 031c 9 9Z99 tlNOZIbY 'SIIIH WIN nO! ' 10Z 31 nS '3Atl M3Ul4atld '3 91L91 �T *MQV420YNIIM V ONIUMMIDNi� t. ; 10_ AQJY q ❑ LLIwD V /�b I .arm�w. •a awe O l�Gr� SNOU33S - lvld WNI! 06rAMOB SIIIH NIVINf10! 'N 009f1 sr a I V. ( 101 V13dN01 a O -90' NaY vinlNIWOONOO vnvm i S Vl $ m f— O ¢ J 110 °x _ tau Isarcroldjawo6luowp :Pow -a ev9Q-av (Do,) .a, s.al-cto (09+) 99ZS9 VNOZIN SIIIH NO"..3 ' ♦OZ' 311nS '3AV M3UNMtlVd 3 9Q9I 3 tj � n '1NHN130VNY11 T OwIp1umno i V V ❑ JJ.J V A63 ❑ W NO1103S - IVId IVNId O8VA3lnOS SIIIH NIVINnOj "N 009CI .r— ( 101 V13d)401 a ryas �.a. _ O -90 Huy wnipawonNon vnvm S V-1 g a f- 0 Q J L ��TAIN a — a �• ,,: 191 �,bat is AT+"" DATE: TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: TOWN of FOUNTAIN HILLS Community Development Department MEMORANDUM August 7, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and Town Council Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner 1`� Case # S2002-023; Preliminary and Final Plat for "The La Montana Condominiums"; located at 16726 E. La Montana Dr.; aka. Lot 9a, Block 3, Plat 102. This is a request by David Vidalin, to condominiumize a 15-unit multiple family project with a common pool amenity. Staff recommends approval of this preliminary and final plat. Please see the attached staff report for detail regarding this request. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (480) 816-5138. 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS sow PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION & STAFF REPORT August 15, 2002 CASE NO: S2002-023 LOCATION: 16726 E. La Montana Dr.; aka. Lot 9a, Block 3, Plat 102 REQUEST: Consider the Preliminary and Final Plat for "The La Montana Crossing Condominiums", a 15-unit condominium project. PROJECT MANAGER: DESCRIPTION: Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner OWNER: David Vidalin APPLICANT: David Vidalin EXISTING ZONING: "R-3" EXISTING CONDITION: Undeveloped lot LOT SIZE: 46,401 square feet SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: NORTH: Cambria court Condominiums and undeveloped lot; zoned "R-3" SOUTH: Shopping Plaza; zoned "C-2" EAST: Northstar Condominiums; zoned "R-3 WEST: The Crossings Commercial Shopping Plaza; zoned "C-2 P.U.D." SUMMARY: This request is for approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for "La Montana Crossing Condominiums" Declaration of Condominium, which subdivides cubic airspace, and is not a land sell project. Due to the simplicity of this request and the fact that this project has limited off -site public improvements, a "fast track" process is being allowed. The owner, David Vidalin, has chosen to convert a 15-unit multiple family residential complex and record a Declaration of Condominium to sell the units individually. The units will have a maximum livable area of 1,372 square feet, a minimum livable area of 1,096 square feet and a covered patio. Each unit will have two designated parking spaces on -site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of S2002-023; Preliminary and Final Plat "The La Montana Crossing Condominiums". R, TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VDOMINIUMPL�4TAPPtCrAT1QN:�r,, Date Filed Fee Paid ,40 or a Condominium Name N, Condominium Address f 4 Legal Description of Lot/Parcel Being Platted Plat 14902 Parcel Size o •oGs , Number of fracts A JF nve- General Plan Land Use Desi nation *, e Density Requested (Dwellingfunits Per Acre) Applicant 1Add I Ires /0 wG j y MOW C/1 , 5- i . Owner Lle Address Attachments (Please list) _ i- r. /� -f- Accepted By C Block 3 Lot(s) Number of Units 'frs Zoning �-3 City City �M Icok)40*1 0- X"& A44.1 Signature of Owner I HERBY AUTHORIZE (Please Print) TO FILE THIS APPLICATION. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of Notary Public TOWN OF FOUNTAI ORT'ssion Expires J U N 2 4 2002 COMMUNITY Day Phone Vo '.5/0 64111 1 Zip .cam Day Phone ST Zip Date ��•�/- Off. ,19 DEPARTMEN TFH Case Number Fee Schedule Attached ^+ i r 1 4 E 3 .pyyy n 951 a t E low 0,101 5 e 5� ,ie+e9Xiji !j 5 51�1�H�1 Ua�i°}!,Ili !1s1�s�1 i J = N zcm H N Z Z u' �o N cc Q za Vr 00 U Q W 8J n � r r.— I ccccceecr eeccccccr e c tuttttu tttuttu t t 4R444g4� 44!l44�E1 � i 1 MUM! offiffif! :Illul � Illnll � § j 5555555 + 5555555 � � d d !I ME i Im .10 1 +� z ao o � 0 cn a z o�\ r D so � o :\ z - i cr O — �5 a o n$ n n g3� ri of � of o 0 00 o f� o �7 o y N D t z N N t Z F r) z O D Z i O 0 7 cli t _p5 Z 1✓ O i— EL f' HH ,Z '.J.A N zz r t r 00 , PI) Pon» z N t r 7 j \ �\ t � N O N �. tt � Z Z z z i\ NN 77 N r t y .00 6 ,00.6 _ R � � b R 6 III .01 � s � I ! I Itl � � �9y � ei g n o r°Pi °ri M of of 00 ORDINANCE NO.02-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, ASSESSING UPON THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS AND PARCELS WITHIN THE COTTONWOODS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH PARCEL IN THE DISTRICT SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN PEDESTRIAN AREAS, PARKING AND PARKWAYS, ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2003. WHEREAS, the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Sections 48-574 and 48-575 allow for the assessment of maintenance charges upon the lots and parcels within an improvement district and such assessments to be collected in the manner and by the officers provided by law for the collection and enforcement of general taxes; and WHEREAS, Maricopa County is the assessing and collecting authority for the Town of Fountain Hills, the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the County Assessor and the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County, Arizona; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. There is hereby levied on each lot and tax parcel listed in the attached Exhibit A within the corporate limits of the Town of Fountain Hills Cottonwoods Maintenance District the amount listed on such Exhibit A for the purpose of providing maintenance for certain pedestrian areas, parking and parkways for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003. SECTION 2. Failure by the county officials of Maricopa County, Arizona, to properly return the delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in the same, or any irregularity in any proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or invalidate any title conveyed by any tax or foreclosure deed; failure or neglect of any officer or officers to timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them, shall not invalidate any proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto, the validity of the assessment or of the judgement of sale by which the collection of the same may be enforced, shall not affect the lien of the Town of Fountain Hills upon such property for the delinquent assessment unpaid thereon, and no overcharge as to part of the assessment or of costs shall invalidate any proceedings for the collection of assessments or the foreclosure; and all acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure. SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTW) by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this day of N IA!� u O— , 2002. ATTEST: Cassie B. Hansen, Director of Administration/Town Clerk REVIEWED BY/APPROVED AS 19 FORM: William E. Farrell, Acting iSTV0hr Attorney EXHIBIT A Lot No. Tax Parcel No. Amount to be Levied* 1 176-03-923 $57.15 2 176-03-924 $57.15 3 176-03-925 $57.15 4 176-03-926 $57.15 5 176-03-927 $57.15 6 176-03-928 $57.15 7 176-03-929 $57.15 8 176-03-930 $57.15 9 176-03-931 $57.15 10 176-03-932 $57.15 11 176-03-933 $57.15 12 176-03-934 $57.15 13 176-03-935 $57.15 14 176-03-936 $57.15 15 176-03-937 $57.15 16 176-03-938 $57.15 17 176-03-939 $57.15 18 176-03-940 $57.15 19 176-03-941 $57.15 20 176-03-942 $57.15 21 176-03-943 $57.15 22 176-03-944 $57.15 23 176-03-945 $57.15 24 176-03-946 $57.15 25 176-03-947 $57.15 26 176-03-948 $57.15 27 176-03-949 $57.15 28 176-03-950 $57.15 29 176-03-952 $57.15 30 176-03-953 $57.15 31 176-03-953 $57.15 32 176-03-954 $57.15 33 176-03-955 $57.15 34 176-03-956 $57.15 35 176-03-957 $57.15 36 176-03-958 $57.15 37 176-03-959 $57.15 38 176-03-960 $57.15 39 176-03-961 $57.15 40 176-03-962 $57.15 41 176-03-963 $57.15 Lot No. Tax Parcel No. Amount to be Levied* 42 176-03-964 $57.15 43 176-03-965 $57.15 44 176-03-966 $57.15 45 176-03-967 $57.15 46 176-03-968 $57.15 47 176-03-969 $57.15 48 176-03-970 $57.15 49 176-03-971 $57.15 50 176-03-972 $57.15 51 176-03-973 $57.15 52 176-03-974 $57.15 53 176-03-975 $57.15 54 176-03-976 $57.15 55 176-03-977 $57.15 56 176-03-978 $57.15 57 176-03-979 $57.15 58 176-03-980 $57.15 *such sum may be paid in two installments, along with such parcel's other taxes /jb Chron 164 O�IyTAI1V p a �• tsrto that is A Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS Public Works Department Engineering Division MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council FROM: Jim Leubner, Senior Civil Engineen�L REVIEWED: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public WO DATE: August 8, 2002 RE: Easement Abandonment 2002-16; Resolution 2002-32 Four Peaks Plaza includes: • Eight (8') Foot Electric Easement • Twenty (20') Foot Effluent Line Easement • Twenty -Five (25') Foot Public Utility and Drainage Easement MCO Properties Tkis item on the Town Council's agenda is a proposal to abandon a portion of the existing 8 foot Electric Easement, and also the 20 foot Effluent Line Easement and the 25 foot wide Public Utility and Drainage Easement within the Four Peaks Plaza Plat. It is important to note that these easement abandonments were required as stipulations of approval for both the Four Peaks Plaza Preliminary Plat (October 2000) and the Final Plat (June 2001). These easement abandonments are necessary for the completion and approval of the Four Peaks Plaza project. Exhibit "A" shows those easements to be abandoned and/or retained. The Public Works Department/Engineering Division has reviewed the site to ascertain any drainage issues in addition to the Town's general interest in the easements. It is the professional opinion of the Engineering Division that there is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easements proposed to be abandoned. The recently constructed Laser Channel and associated drainage easement have replaced the prior drainage easement and has been approved by Town staff and also FEMA (Flood Emergency Management Association). All affected utility companies have been notified of these abandonment proposals and have approved all of the various easement abandonments. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2002-32. att: Exhibit "A" 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 k. When recorded, return to: Public Works Department/ Engineering Division Town of Fountain Hills P.O. Box 17958 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269 RESOLUTION 2002-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA ABANDONING WHATEVER RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN, A PORTION OF THE CERTAIN EIGHT (8') FOOT ELECTRIC EASEMENT, THE TWENTY (20') FOOT EFFLUENT LINE EASEMENT AND THE TWENTY-FIVE (25') FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE FOUR PEAKS PLAZA "FINAL PLAT", FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 568 OF MAPS, PAGE 39, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, as the governing body of real property located in the Town of Fountain Hills, may require the dedication of public streets, sewer, water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights -of -way within any proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills has the authority to accept or reject offers of dedication of private property by easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful means; and WHEREAS, All present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona as follows: SECTION 1. That a portion of the certain eight (8') foot electric easement, the twenty (20') effluent line easement and the twenty-five (25') foot public utility and drainage easement; as shown in Exhibit "A"; as recorded in book 568 of maps, page 39 records of Maricopa County, Arizona; are hereby declared to be abandoned by the Town of Fountain Hills. Certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -lot drainage runoff. The property owners of the Four Peaks Plaza Project are required to pass the developed flows generated by the upstream lots and streets across their property. SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in no way attempts to affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or assert any right resulting therefrom or existing previous to any action by the Town. Resolution 2002-32 Page 1 of 2 PASS FAIL,,��--���5"d,- MOTION �+►'C.am &A -I ♦- SECOND - te-0 n}+4, COUNT 7—O r PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August 2002. ATTEST: \LJ Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: Interim Town M ager L: L FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HII.LS William E. Farrell, Town Attorney Resolution 2002-32 Page 2 of 2 CI SAGLE 20 1 t i 1 i r !)1 r s i i r /Ac pal r ��•- MI /gyp LANp S � Ie�o►� \M A tF,yo��i i IIIIMt � aEi�c 33321 J' DOE P.41CHf, EL J. 0 ,p0 NO1 n PUM 1ER I Chron R Il o��'TAINl ao �� Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS a Public Works Department � MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council , FROM: Art Candelaria, Civil Engineer � REVIEWED: Randy Harrel, Town Enginee�, 1. �9 r\l THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public W�ks DATE: August 9, 2002 RE: Easement Abandonment 2002-14; Resolution 2002-33 15219 N. Wiley Drive Plat 431, Block 4, Lot 23 Michael and Marilyn Grudier This item on the Town Council's agenda is a proposal to abandon the ten (10) foot public utility and drainage easements located at the southerly and easterly property lines of Lot 23, Block 4, Plat 431, (15219 N. Wiley Drive) as shown in Exhibit "A". The property owners of Lot 23 desire the assurance that any future improvements made to the lot will not be infringed upon by the construction of utilities. Staff has received no comments to date from the adjacent property owners. The westerly 20' of the southerly 10' public utility easement will be retained for existing and potential future utility boxes. The Engineering Department has reviewed the site to ascertain any drainage issues in addition to the Town's general interest in the easement. It is the professional opinion of the Engineering Department that there is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easement proposed to be abandoned, with the understanding that certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to - lot drainage runoff. The property owners of Lot 23 are required to pass the developed flows generated by the upstream lots across their property. All affected utility companies have been notified of this abandonment proposal and have approved of the proposed abandonment of this public utility easement. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2002-33. lib att. Cc: Michael & Marilyn Grudier B. Seimon P. Gonvers M/M Broznak EA2002-14; Res. 33 Plat 431, Blk 4, Lot 23 (15219 N. Wiley Dr.) Grudier 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain F ills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 When recorded, return to: Engineering Department Town of Fountain Hills P.O. Box 17958 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269 RESOLUTION 2002-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA ABANDONING WHATEVER RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN A PORTION OF THE CERTAIN TEN (10') FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOT 23, BLOCK 4, OF PLAT 431, FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 151 OF MAPS, PAGE 43, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, as the governing body of real property located in the Town of Fountain Hills, may require the dedication of public streets, sewer, water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights -of -way within any proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills has the authority to accept or reject offers of dedication of private property by easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful means; and 4 WHEREAS, All present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona as follows: SECTION 1. That a portion of the certain ten (10) foot public utility and drainage easements, located along the southerly and easterly property lot lines of Plat 431, Block 4, Lot 23, Fountain Hills, Arizona; as shown in Exhibit "A"; as recorded in book 151 of maps, page 43 records of Maricopa County, Arizona; are hereby declared to be abandoned by the Town of Fountain Hills. Certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -lot drainage runoff. The property owners of Lot 23 are required to pass the developed flows generated by the upstream lots across their property. SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in no way attempts to affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or assert any right resulting there from or existing previous to any action by the Town. Resolution 2002-33 Page 1 of 2 7 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15'' day of August, 2002. ATTEST: Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk REU�EWED BY: 4TIntenim—TownManager FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS William E. Farrell, Town Attorney Resolution 2002-33 Page 2 of 2 Chron 139 o � that is Ate'" Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS Public Works Department MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council FROM: Art Candelaria, Civil Engineer } L REVIEWED: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer�(� i THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public W DATE: July 30, 2002 RE: Easement Abandonment 2002-15: Resolution 2002-34 16673 N. Boxcar Drive Plat 505D, Block 1, Lot 36 Ted & Debra Donatoni This item on the Town Council's agenda is a proposal to abandon the ten (10) foot public utility and drainage easements located a the northeast and northwest property lines of Lot 36, Block 1, Plat 505D, (16673 N. Boxcar Drive) as shown in Exhibit "A". The property owners of Lot 36 desire the assurance that any future improvements made to the lot will not be infringed upon by the construction of utilities. Staff has received no comments to date from the adjacent property owners. The southwest 20' of the northwest 10' public utility easement will be retained for existing and potential future utility boxes. The Engineering Department has reviewed the site to ascertain any drainage issues in addition to the Town's general interest in the easement. It is the professional opinion of the Engineering Department that there is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easement proposed to be abandoned, with the understanding that certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to - lot drainage runoff. The property owners of Lot 36 are required to pass the developed flows generated by the upstream lots across their property, All affected utility companies have been notified of this abandonment proposal and have approved of the proposed abandonment of this public utility easement. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2002-34. /jb att. Cc: Ted & Debra Donatoni 4W Mr. Miceli & Ms. Sambora M/M Howell N/M Melucci EA2002-15; Res. 34 Plat 505D, Blk 1, Lot 36 (16673 N. Boxcar Dr.) Donatoni 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 11 When recorded, return to: Engineering Department Town of Fountain Hills P.O. Box 17958 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269 RESOLUTION 2002-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA ABANDONING WHATEVER RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN A PORTION OF THE CERTAIN TEN (10') FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ALONG THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST LOT LINES OF LOT 36, BLOCK 1, OF PLAT 505D, FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 158 OF MAPS, PAGE 41, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, as the governing body of real property located in the Town of Fountain Hills, may require the dedication of public streets, sewer, water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights -of -way within any proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills has the authority to accept or reject offers of dedication of private property by easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful means; and WHEREAS, All present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona as follows: SECTION 1. That a portion of the certain ten (10) foot public utility and drainage easements, located along the northeast and northwest property lot lines of Plat 505D, Block 1, Lot 36, Fountain Hills, Arizona; as shown in Exhibit "A"; as recorded in book 158 of maps, page 41 records of Maricopa County, Arizona; are hereby declared to be abandoned by the Town of Fountain Hills. Certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot -to -lot drainage runoff. The property owners of Lot 36 are required to pass the developed flows generated by the upstream lots across their property. SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in no way attempts to affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or assert any right resulting there from or existing previous to any action by the Town. Resolution 2002-34 Page 1 of 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15`h day of August 2002. ATTEST: (414A Cassie B. Hansen, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: terim Town Mana e i � .1 FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ARVZkOVED AS TO FORM: 57Z William E. Farrell, Town Attorney Resolution 2002-34 Page 2 of 2 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Town Council THROUGH: Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager FROM: Jesse Drake, AICP J D Interim Director of Community Development DATE: August 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Consideration of ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION to accept the proposal for the Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan submitted by Premier Engineering and complete a contract for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00 for fiscal year 2002-03. The Fountain Hills McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission met on August 6, 2002 to open and review the proposals for the Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan that had been received in response to a Request For Proposal that had been sent out in June to three design firms. As a part of the proposal process, members of the Preservation Commission and staff had participated in site visits with the candidate firm representatives. All of the design firms receiving an RFP responded to the request for proposal. One firm's proposal did not meet the criteria outlined in the RFP. Of the two qualified candidates, the Preservation Commission voted to recommend awarding the project to Premier Engineering. A copy of the proposal is attached. Proposal Analysis: Firm Name Met Proposal Proposed Criteria? Fee Premier Engineering yes $15,250-$21,000 Douglas Architecture & Planning yes $25,000-$48,000 Dibble & Associates no none submitted July 22, 2002 Jesse Drake Interim Director Community Development 16836 East Palisades Blvd., Bldg. C Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 RE: Request for Proposals Fountain Hills McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan Dear Ms. Drake: ENGINEERING CORPORATION Premier Engineering Corporation (Premier) is very pleased to respond to your request for proposal for Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan. Our Team's specialization in open space, trails, park and recreation planning, environmental resources, and design projects enables us to understand and effectively respond to the specific issues associated with this type of project. We have selected Roberts/Jones Architects, Inc. as our Team member based on their individual expertise and commitment to product excellence, environmental sensitivity, and ability to assist us in meeting the architectural needs of the citizens of Fountain Hills for this unique and environmentally sensitive project. The Premier Team has proven experience and dedication to meet the needs of our clients, while providing fresh perspective and innovative solutions. Significant factors, which we believe make our Team uniquely qualified for this special project include: + Proven approach to desert open space design and landscape planning. + Project specific public participation programs focused on public need and acceptance. + Trail and recreation design specialist. + Utilization of leading edge technologies for effective modeling and analysis of influencing factors. + Award winning recognition for excellence in desert planning and design. We appreciate your review of our qualification and are eager to begin work on this important project. The Premier Team welcomes the opportunity to discuss our qualifications and approach in greater detail. Please call us if we can provide clarification or be of further assistance. Sincerely, Premier Engineering Corporation Je in , RLA, ASLA .ncipal Dean A. Chambers, RLA, ASLA Project Manager 1600 W. Broadway Road, Suite 165 • Tempe, AZ 85282 • (480) 829-6000 • Fax (480) 829-6016 n1", MISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter Firm Section FirmOverview............................................................................................................... 1 FirmCapacity...................................................:.............................................................1 Past Performance Key Abilities Relevant Experience Team Section = DesignPhilosophy.......................................................................................................... 1 OrganizationChart .......................................................................................................... 2 . Resumes............................................................................. ................. 3 { Experience Section ProjectDescriptions....................................................................................................... 1 Potential Solutions Site Plan DesignIdeas ................................................................................. .............................. 2 FeeEstimate.................................................................................................................. 1 kT . - i Table of Contents Page i ENOINEERINO GORPORA.TION Firm ap Ir � '"� �„�; • .. ;e'er i {. -<q'1 �' • 1, .y � t _. i ram• "."L. ><. C ,yam t }'x yam' �' �. .�`. .•` j' l r�., .�,/Tti�;lj/s� yy\+ �S ,f ..'a -" j•, r..l '*}"ys'}F^g3�'r.• ' - �L f � , �'�t T �. M fir• ` �'� i.'J•'� • f � �) �. �- ..T �i1 'a •t r is „t + -� o- + '� • •� : xi ,� c 3 r ,�a ti [ r . . , "•i L s - F ,� ' ;IR � f•' ys'�Q^tyty,Jt y>�1�f�'� �•!�y tj -�" p'� r � t•�� '� �..',r'� k' '� fir•.. � 't{. , f� I}•.� . d�ll F J Z• . %� �ty.+2�..,'i!. `t; r IV t. , i t���' Y r � '`� , � .1• r _�'+-r lr.i1 '! ��isS�i�` "' -�•r ,r' - •�� ��cs : 1- DY .'f �Fi MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDS CAPE PLAN 11 N.Z;;% FIRM OVERVIEW Premier Engineering Corporation (Premier) was founded in 1995. Today with principals experienced in the fields of landscape architecture, civil engineering, structural engineering, and water resources engineering, Premier is truly a multi -disciplined firm capable of completing large-scale public works projects with in-house capabilities. Since our inception, Premier has been commissioned for more than 270 contracts. Last year alone Premier was responsible for more than 3.5 million dollars in design fees for the public sector. We owe our success thus far to the high level of client confidence in the excellent performance of Premier. We take pride in our responsiveness to the needs of the clients, our adherence to the project schedule and budget and our reasonable fee estimates. With a full time staff of 31, Premier is one ofthe largest multi -discipline M/DBE firms in the valley. Our staff level includes 13 registered professionals (4 Registered Landscape Architects), 9 design professionals, 4 CADD designers and 5 administration personnel. The majority of our experience has been gained through the completion of public works projects for local governmental agencies which include the Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department, Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT), Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC), Town of Queen Creek, cities of Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, Tempe, Peoria, Goodyear, Casa Grande, and Glendale; Pinal County, and Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). Our Landscape Architectural Department consists of 10 professionals with a combined experience of over 90 years. During the past year, the landscape architectural staff was responsible for the design of close to one million dollars and over ten million dollars in related construction activities. The well-rounded and creative staff at Premier has the unique ability to design projects that are able to be implemented without sacrificing creativity. Because Premier's principals are "hands-on" working project managers, Fountain Hills is assured that its project will receive close attention to detail and responsive service that is often lacking in larger firms that have a multi -level chain of command to work through to complete a project. Premier is able to provide Fountain Hills with high -quality services performed by experienced professionals within budget and schedule requirements. FIRM CAPACITY Premier has the personnel, resources and financial capabilities to initiate and complete this trailhead design and landscape plan for the McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission in accordance with your time schedule and with exceptional and unmatched quality. We have recently completed or will be completing projects for the cities of Phoenix, Peoria, and Casa Grande and the town of Queen Creek that have significantly freed up the landscape architectural staff, making them available for this project. PAST PERFORMANCE The Premier Team was selected based on skills, relevant experience, and sincere desire to contribute to this project. Premier has developed a long-term relationship with Roberts/Jones Architects, Inc. (Roberts/Jones) through their involvement on numerous projects. This will not be the first time that these Team members have worked together on a successful project. These Team members have experience delivering projects that are directly applicable in terms of scope and content. Experience with projects requiring the Firm Section Page 1 n,A�MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN `� - coordination of multiple disciplines and extensive public involvement is a speciality of Premier's Landscape Architecture Department. In addition, our Team possess the technical skills necessary to conduct a thorough analysis, identify operational concerns, opportunities and constraints for design, and develop effective implementation strategies. KEY ABILITIES Specific Team abilities to meet key project requirements: Desert Lands / Open Space Planning & Design - Sound planning and design methodologies for defensible planning implementation and design strategies. - Contextual project design. - "Ground Truth" field testing of design concepts in preliminary stages to confirm positive relationships with the desert environment. - Utilization of design techniques to reduce impacts to views and environment. Public Participation - Listen and incorporate public input into the master plan. - Use of interactive exercises to gain greater participation. Computer Modeling and Analysis - Development of concepts and design ideas utilizing 3-D Modeling as an analytical tool. Park Projects with Trail Systems & Parking - Over the past 5 years Premier's landscape architecture staff has completed 30 parks and recreation facilities with a value ofover 72 million - dollars in construction. Firm Section Page 2 ENGINEERING GORPORI.TION JyrtNn h,` v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN J Relevant Experience t F 2 to SaladoFao Environme s Corp or Engineers / City or Phoenix ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ �r V / N erramar city of Peoria ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ V / ✓ Tempe Trail Improvements City or Tealpe ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ V/ ✓ ✓ ✓ Steelen City of Phoenix ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Consolidated rai City or Chandler ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Scottsdale Trails as r City or Scottsdaie ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ e Creek RegionalArea itsRecreation Y rlcopa County ParksD.partal.11t ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Scottsdale Desert s Design e Ines City or Scottsdale ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ nsa Park City of Peoria ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ / ✓ Cholla Park�r City of Phoenix ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ V/ ✓ ✓ City of Phoenix s eserve n e City of Phoenix ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓Ed / Per Athletic Complex e City or Casa Grand. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ WO Toren of Queen Croat ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ un ers e Tosrn or Queen Crook ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Flardy Warner Athletic Complex City or toque ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ r e Park Torn or Queen Croat ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ / / ✓ 10wanis @ City of Peoria ,/ ,/ ✓ ,/ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Neighborhoodmprovemen ode crry or aland.ie ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ w River Kwanis e Y rleopa county Pub Dept. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ NDrth Campus e City of Casa Grande ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ / �r / �r Paiute @ Flood Control Dist. Yricopa CountyPeart ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ / V / Y Park @ City or Case Grande ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Recker& Thomas Roads Communitye t City or rose ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Rose Mofford Sports Complex City of Phoenix ,/ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Steeple!Peoria City ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ / / / Sundance @ City of Peoria ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ / / / nnya pe City o/ Peoria ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Sweetwater✓ City or Peoria is ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Tumbleweed Community✓ Cof Chandler ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓City West chandler Regional m plex e City or Chandler __ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ �V��NYaY LJ4r61 R114.i VI L wanl V Jdm Derz Finn Section Page 3 Team AI 54 i a •� � NOV VIC— t\ a `� i r � • 1 . i. , /= i � � aFr! � �+' L + r �4. �.�,+ � .R 4Y r'• ~� y, ..: c � to � �. s� r - �. �C. i �, 1 r r y t '�'7' � • r � � 9[ �. � . ,fit'""" •.� � �� a°. �,{g• k .F ,. •.�, 1, � +.r ,�.� �J'/' `. " � r� � ' •r• • ,.a �� �i r�y}� %. '} ,}� ♦ , � i - � - - r '?F••' ... '+xl 1*, '. - s. ." ''�! ? �. '' �` (fit t�� :'��, . • /"L� - t ~ '. •' _7`t}F#•�' ..'bi r �f L, A . �yYi'w,-a1. i+�' .- �� r�Y..A.i - . l� r �r r, �'-' - � ► +,y � 1 t1�• � r dL� '�'!�y •, �y? ��-�` ,�,i„•:.t �1"rMt. -:Ij'r }'�''-..' '•S`t+; IT /,. ..� •�,� �,+ c- •i^ - � .. l ice' t� ? r C� ;Z�r'.� ti%t { r ,. ♦ a. i� .. S 4,'► 1 ,\fet �^' r t. , i, �t� 1�•` 1 � -t4.1 �Vl T �.' T � • / f y� ���.,/ " rt•• � �.Il' :i Si 16 ' � F�1 ��,�' f�' � •+1F �`r'� � '• ^', � � � t c�' �'^ ✓ •,� '�`'Y,�r Sr'i�.{jyf� 1r�� (l , .3'� S,� ; •- r Z,I •tif Yi �r, a/ r i. 94 ` Y � ♦ -,'��� j�� jam` '+� l .T rZ+ � ,`jr� '�✓� iF3� J"•� ,�y,'sfi . i ./ ''r /T 1 •i ir. r�r a(: Via, `���1- �4Yril.�.y�� r� ti j�r,�'.��'�� •r" � �� ,vr �: �NTAIN yi `�. McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ,e DESIGN PHILOSOPHY The Sonoran desert is a unique and beautiful place with special requirements for living. Just as we tread lightly when we hike a scenic desert trail, we must also tread lightly with our constructed improvements. These improvements (trails, trailheads, comfort facilities, parking, roads, etc.) if planned for and designed correctly promise to enhance our interaction with the natural environment. There are significant examples throughout the valley where the "improvement" creates a negative effect to the environment (disturbed vegetation, scars, interrupted views, un-natural forms, noise, glare, etc.) degrading the desired natural experience. We believe in using our skills and experiences as designers to provide the most natural and enhanced environmental experience, enriching the lives of those who interact with the facility and site. We intend on utilizing our proven methods of design to execute this commission for the best possible product. These techniques include: Earth integrated sensitive siting of buildings, roads and other structures Native materials; stone, decomposed granite, vegetation Water harvesting Alternative and green building materials; rammed earth, gabion baskets, "eco" block, Rasta block, desert masonry, rust patina metal "Ground truth" field verification of design concepts prior to construction activities Minimum import/export of materials from site Low profile/massing of structures Native desert colors Protection of view -sheds onto and off of the site In the end the experience we have ofhiking the trail, hearing the crunch of the path under our boots, the smell of the creosote after a rain, the view to the mountains are the ultimate test of our endeavors. We intend to bring enjoyment to the souls of the future users of this facility while minimizing impacts to "mother earth's" soul in the process. Team Section Page 1 EN6INEERIN6 CORPOR..TIpN Y \v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ORGANIZATION CHART Planning / Landscape Architecture Jeff Velasquez, RLA Harry Woelzlein, RLA Rick Campbell, LAIT Kurt Montei, ALSA Patricia Butler, ASLA Premier Fountain Hills Project Manager Jeff Enpelmann, RLA ASLA Principal -in -Charge Premier Dean A. Chambers, RLA ASLA Project Manager Premier Civil / Drainage Jeff Holzmeister, P.E. Pat Fyie, P.E. Mike Luecker, P.E. Premier Team Section Page 2 Architecture Jonathan Peiffer, AIA Roberts/Jones Architects .iTA1.V y� MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN JEFF ENGELMANN, RLA PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE Jeff is a Principal of Premier Engineering Corporation with over 17 years of landscape EDUCATION architecture experience and has been involved in a wide variety of projects throughout BLA, Landscape Arizona Jeffprovides p management and guidance forproject design and plan preparation, Architecture 1983 client coordination to ensure information essential to our design services is responsive to Iowa State the required standards, and assists in the supervision of project development and office University AutoCAD Management administration. Jef's area ofexpertise is revegetation, master planning, recreation planning & Aut CAD and design and development of construction documents. He has been involved in numerous Professional 1988 Drainage Channel Enhancements, River Trails, Streetscapes, Park and Recreation Master CADD Institute Tempe, Arizona Plans, Construction Document development and public input process. In addition to the technical expertise of parks and recreation analysis, the majority of these projects have REGISTRATION also required public involvement, the development of construction cost estimates, and Landscape Architect benefit/cost analyses to determine the economic feasibility of a specific recreation plan. State of Arizona State of Missouri Jeff has managed and coordinated landscape architecture and recreation projects for State of Kansas various local public agencies. Relevant experience includes the following: Rio Salado Environmental Restoration; (Corp of Engineers/City of Phoenix) - Lead Landscape Architect for this five -mile project which includes field investigations, the preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. Premier is responsible for the Landscape Architectural planning, design and implementation. These services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities. Terramar Park; (City of Peoria) - Principal in Charge of this 25-acre parcel of land nestled in the far northwest valley. The site is very unique for an urban municipal park in that the site backs up to the native and undeveloped New River corridor and is composed of native undisturbed desert with the unique character of the Sonoran Desert and the site has several significant native wash corridors that traverse the site adding to the topographic and plant material diversity of the site. Premier was responsible for extensive public involvement with four public meetings attended on average at each meeting by over 100 citizens and the use of a general park survey to gather the pulse of the surrounding neighborhood. The result of this extensive input process is a park plan that is a balance of turf and open space, basketball courts, an urban skate park elements, extensive trail system, parking for up to 50 cars and a restroom. These elements were all designed to blend into the site and are all encompassed and wrapped around and through a preserved and enhance desert ecosystem including the protection and use of the native washes as significant features of the parks development. Team Section Page 3 ENGINEERING CORPORATION %" JAJN y� MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN b� Med JEFF ENGELMANN, RLA ` w PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE - CONTINUED New River Kiwanis Park; New River, AZ (Maricopa County Parks Department) -Premier provided professional services for park master planning for this 80-acre regional park in New River, Arizona. The park is part of the Maricopa County parks system. As Project Manager, Jeff's efforts include the master planning of this rugged mountain park. The park was master planned to accommodate a community center complex that will include a multi -generational facility, kitchen, senior center, gym, classrooms, weight room, and a family aquatic center. The park plan also includes separate areas for both a professional and therapeutic rodeo horse arenas with improved covered spectator seating, large corporate and individual picnic ramadas, extensive trail network, restroom buildings, overnight RV camping areas, tent camping areas, and a 300-person amphitheater. Estrella Mountain Regional Park; Goodyear, AZ (Maricopa County Parks Department) - Prc j ect Landscape Architect responsibilities included the development of the master plan and construction documents for this 3 million dollar park improvement located in Mancopa County. The improvements included developing construction documents for 2 lighted and fenced softball fields, restroom facility, large tot lot/adventure play ground area, new entry, new maintenance building, maj or road circulation patterns, and several new parking lots. The plans and documents were all completed on AutoCAD allowing the client the opportunity to review on screen the drawings and make changes as issues were discussed. Rillito RiverBicycle & Equestrian Trails; (City of Tucson) - Project Manager. His responsibilities included recreational facility master planning, cost estimating, specifications, facilitation at working group meetings, 1%W coordination with Pima County, and the Corps of Engineers, and construction document development ofthe trail facilities that spanned over 10 miles for both sides of the River and included: pedestrian plaza areas, equestrian staging areas, parking lots, utility extensions, restrooms, and 16 pedestrian bridges that both spanned the Rillito River itselfand the numerous tributaries that feed the river. The five million dollar project was recently completed and opened for public use. West Valley Recreation Corridor- Jeff served as the project manager for this extensive trail system project. His responsibilities included recreational facility master planning for the development of a trail system that would traverse the river corridor from the Waddel Dam following the alignment of the Agua Fria River to the Gila River a distance of well over 30 miles. The concept for a recreational trail along this corridor was developed for John F. Long Properties Inc. and established the design theme and approach that Mr. Long has since taken to the various Cities and Towns that line the corridor promoting the development of this recreational trail system. Portions of the project are currently under design by the surrounding communities and the concept is being adopted by those communities as open space in their planning and zoning endeavors. The original documents have assisted the adjacent communities in adopting rules and regulations for development of this open space associated with private and public development activities adjacent to the corridor. Arizona Canal Diversion Channel Recreational Development; (City of Glendale) - As Project Manager, Jeff's responsibilities included recreational facility master planning, cost estimating, specifications, facilitation at working group meetings, coordination with the City of Glendale Arizona, and the Corps of Engineers, and construction document development of the 3 mile section of recreational development that included: extensive pedestrian/bicycling and equestrian trails, active sports areas including volleyball and basketball courts, soccer Team Section Page 4 ENO�NEERINO GORPORIITION �rvun y� MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN JEFF ENGELMANN, RLA PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE - CONTINUED fields, fitness courses, picnic facilities, adventure play areas, interpretive gardens one specifically developed for the blind, and extensive pedestrian plazas that included restrooms, picnicking ramadas and hardscape areas. All of these enhancements were developed with the flooding potential of the channel inherent in their development, orientation and placement relative to the channel and the flow of water. This project has been recognized for design excellence by the Corps of Engineers. Tumbleweed Park Phase III; (City ofChandler) - Prc j ect Manager responsible for revising the master plan for this phase of the parks development and developing the final construction documents for this 80-acre community park located within the City of Chandler. The project tasks included the evaluation of the existing park master plan, development of a revised park master plan to accommodate the new features and functions associated with the parks usage, design and layout of a performance stage, large gathering areas for the annual Chandler Festival, Hardscape promenades to a central plaza, water features parking lots, electrical for lighting parking, walkways and the required grading, drainage and water & sewer extensions. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates. West Chandler Park; (City ofChandler) - Project Manager responsible for the master plan and developing the final construction documents for this 40-acre community park located within the City of Chandler. The project tasks included the master planning of the park, and design and layout of a three field softball complex, IL centrally located restroom/concessions building, maintenance building and storage area, soccer/football field, small pee -wee ball field overlays spectator seating for all of the ball fields, parking lots, electrical for lighting parking, walkways and the required grading, drainage and water & sewer extensions. Team Section Page 5 MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DEAN CHAMBERS, RLA `► PROJECT MANAGER Dean has the management skills to meet the design goals of the client while ensuring EDUCATION technical issues are address in an effective manner. BLA, Landscape Architecture, Minor in Dean has more than 20 years ofprofessional experience in master planning, site analysis, Geography 1980 programming, design guideline, facilitation ofpublic involvement and information programs Oklahoma State University and workshops, design development, construction documents and construction observation services for award -winning projects. He has served as project manager on REGISTRATION a variety of large-scale design projects specializing in open space. Landscape Architect State of Arizona Dean has directed teams on proj ects including master planning for parks and recreational State of Oklahoma facilities, corporate, industrial, commercial, and residential development. These projects required the organization and overall direction of multi -disciplinary tams including in- house disciplines and specialty consultants. Relevant key projects include the following: Tempe Butte Trail Improvements; (City of Tempe) - Project Landscape Architect responsible for the design of the trails system for Tempe Butte including construction drawings forphase one implementation. Trail alignments followed existing scars to minimize visual/grading impacts fragile on the vegetative cover. Guidelines developed for Papago Park were followed in developing seating areas, trail markers and trail furnishings (benches, walls, trash receptacles and signage). The lower butte trail was designed for the physically handicapped with upslope trail beds offering more challenge for experienced hikers. Emphasis was placed on future expansion of trails within Papago Park to respond to future developments along the Rio Salado and downtown Tempe along Mill Avenue. Trail alignments addressed critical areas ofdrainage, erosion, visual impact and subsequent revegetation of disturbed areas of the butte. Consolidated Canal Initial Feasibility Study; (City of Chandler) - Project Manager responsible for the preparation of the feasibility study determining the potential recreation and transit uses along the canal. The study defines the parameters for the project, including goals, issues, constraints, ideas and improvements. Some ofthe improvements include trailheads, interpretive centers, multi -use trails, signage, and lighting, drinking fountains and emergency call box. Cave Creek Regional Recreation Area; (Maricopa County) - Project Landscape Architect and overall project coordinator for Phases I and II of this 8500-acre county regional park. Facilities include off -site utilities extension, roads, hiking trails, trailheads, bikeways, drainage features, maintenance compound, development of family and group picnic facilities; 40 campsites; and seven comfort stations. Team Section Page 6 ENOINEERINp GORPpRATIpV �• MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DEAN CHAMBERS, RLA `- PROJECT MANAGER - CONTINUED Scottsdale Desert Parks Design Guidelines; (Scottsdale) - Project Manager coordinated with the City of Scottsdale to create the Desert Parks Design Guidelines project. This project established standards and objectives through which parks are to be created in order to capitalize upon the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and meet the needs of the growing metropolitan -Phoenix community. The Scottsdale Desert Parks Design Guidelines book is intended to assist in the evaluation of potential additional park sites, and provide guidance in the development of future recreational facilities. The book addresses the components of site selection and evaluation, site planning and design and development goals. Steele Indian School Park; (City of Phoenix) - Project Manager for a 75-acre park that has been a redevelopment of a historic Phoenix Indian School site. Park features will include the historic core, Native American garden, conservatory/ amphitheater, community linkages, and the Phoenix Green, promontory and neighborhood park. Apache Neighborhood Park; (City ofScottsdale) - Proj ect Manager for an eight -acre park that includes a playground, restrooms and ramadas. Services include Landscape Architecture, demolition, survey, civil, structural, mechanical/electrical engineering, architecture, irrigation and hardscape features. Lake Pleasant Regional Park Master Plan; (Maricopa County) - Project Landscape Architect for the finalizing development of a comprehensive master plan for this 24,500-acre regional park. Work included the review and evaluation of existing data, evaluation of the affected environment and natural resources within the park, and the review and evaluation of public opinion surveys. Also conducted open house presentations throughout the valley to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on developed plans. McCormick/Stillman Railroad Park; (City ofScottsdale) - Project Manager for the major renovations to the 23-year-old McCormick -Stillman Railroad Park in 1997. The project was designed to preserve the park's historic features and enhance use and activities. Improvements include a new shaded passenger platform for the 5/12th scale "Paradise and Pacific Railroad" that chugs over three trestles and a tunnel around the 30-acre park. A new entry greets visitors with the full-size static train display, a restored historic carousel and a new station building. The central plaza is a public green created to provide a center point within the park and space for special events. McCormick Railroad Park Master Plan; (City of Scottsdale) - Project Landscape Architect on the master plan for this 30-acre specialty park. Key components include the development and expansion of a plan that incorporates and elaborates on the thematic elements of the existing miniature railroad amusement rides. Solicitation of public input was essential and was achieved through the use of open public meetings, wall mapping sessions and children's workshops. Existing features and structures were evaluated for how they met the users' needs, maintenance costs and correlation to the railroad theme. Papago Park/Tempe Butte Design Guidelines; (City of Tempe) -Project Landscape Architect responsible for design guidelines for Papago Park and Tempe Butte, a desert open space in the center of the Tempe urban core. The guidelines determined elements of the park such as pedestrian circulation and nodes, structures, r. parking, security lighting, etc. In addition to specific design elements, the study addressed the impact of future Team Section Page 7 , , ENOINEERINO CORPORATION -T-TA,N 4 MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r �s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DEAN CHAMBERS, RLA �► PROJECT MANAGER - CONTINUED surrounding development such as the east Papago Freeway, Rio Salado and Tempe's downtown redevelopment. The study defined treatments for transition zones from the urban fringes to the Desert Park. Chofla Neighborhood park; (City ofScottsdale) - Landscape Architect responsible for the master planning and construction documents for this north Scottsdale neighborhood park. Key issues were protection of native desert areas on -site, interface between the park and the school, grading and preparation of ball fields, and management of runoffand drainage through the site. Construction administration services included review and inspection of grading court surfaces, volleyball, landscape planting, walks and hardscape, playground, restroom building and ramadas, and lighting. Williams Gateway Airport Streetscape, Signage & Landscape Master Plan; (City of Mesa) - Proj ect Manager responsible for the preparation of the landscape and streetscape master plan for Williams Gateway Airport to ensure a quality commercial and aviation facility. The master plan establishes guidelines promoting the image of the desert tech design theme, and identifies design criteria for the development of the entry, streetscape, tenant lots and public spaces. A comprehensive signage program was developed providing efficient circulation into and throughout the project, and effectively expressing the desert tech design theme through the materials and forms of the signs. Four Corners Monument; (AZ, CO, NM, UT) - Senior Associate for the redevelopment of the Four Corners Monument. This project included Native American Interpretive Center, new restroom buildings, vending booths, new monument design, plazas, parking lot, picnic areas, drought to learnt landscape and irrigation. This project also included coordination with the Federal Government, the four states involved, the Navajo Nation and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe. The Reserve at Apache Peak, Desert Mountain; (City ofScottsdale) - Project Landscape Architect for the entry monument, streetscape and revegetation of this exclusive custom lot subdivision. High Sonoran desert plant materials were salvaged and relocated on the site along with new plantings and seeding. Vee Quiva Casino; (Gila River Indian Community, AZ) - Project Manager responsible for the site design of the Vee Quiva Casino. The project is a Sonoran desert themed gaming center located on the Gila River Native American Community in central Arizona. Native desert revegetation of this site provided a healing from the impact of years of abuse, neglect and development. Roadways, parking, drainage corridors and basins along with buildings were sensitively sited and the native landscape restored to mitigate impacts. The central focal point is a sculptural "ruins" and desert "seep" located at the building entry. The design team worked with tribal artist who produced culturally significant baskets and pottery relating to the heritage of the Gila River NativeAmerican Community. Team Section Page 8 ENGINEERING GORVORATION �rru.v yi 'f MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION ti.. TRAILHEAD JEFF VELASQUEZ, DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN RLA PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION BS, Landscape Architecture 1994 Polytechnic University, Pomonz REGISTRATION Landscape Architect State of Arizona Team Section Jeff has more than 6 years of landscape architectural experience, working on a wide variety of projects for both private sector clients and public agencies. His experience includes design and construction management, large-scale park and open space master planning, entry monumentation and streetscape design for major planned community developments, recreational design, public participation, environmental restoration, and construction administration projects. A representative sampling ofkey projects include Rio Salado Environmental Restoration, Sky Harbor Airport's Mohave Parking Facility, streetscape and entry monumentation improvements for Del Webb's Sun City Grand and Sun City Summerlin, environmental restoration and public facility design for the five -mile Rio Salado project in Phoenix, the Pima Freeway Aesthetic Wall Enhancements in Scottsdale, streetscape and monumentation for Stetson Hills in north Phoenix, and construction administration for the recently -completed I-10/ 101 freeway interchange in the West Valley. Relevant experience includes the following: Rio Salado Environmental Restoration; (Corp of Engineers/City of Phoenix) - Landscape Architect for this five -mile project which includes field investigations, the preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. Premier is responsible for the Landscape Architectural planning, design and implementation. These services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities. New River Kiwanis Park; New River, AZ (Maricopa County Parks Department) - Project Designer responsible for master planning this 80-acre regional park in New River, Arizona. The park, which sits on beautifully lush hillside topography, is part of the Maricopa County Parks System. The efforts included the master planning of approximately $18 million of site amenities on this rugged mountain park. The site has been master planned to accommodate a community center complex which will include a multi -generational facility, kitchen, senior center, library, gymnasium, classrooms, weight room, family aquatic -enter, and a 400-person hillside amphitheater. The park design also includes separate ireas for both a professional and therapeutic rodeo arena with improved covered spectator Seating, a rodeo village center, little league baseball facilities, large corporate and individual ullside picnic ramadas, extensive trail network, restroom buildings, overnight RV camping Eone, equestrian staging nodes, and tent camping areas. kntonio Parkway Ballfields; Rancho Santa Margarita, CA (Rancho Santa Margarita Company) - Project Designer and Project Manager responsible for developing he final construction documents for this neighborhood park and Little League facility. Page 9 J�STAIN y� f!'c McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN JEFF VELASQUEZ, RLA `- PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - CONTINUED The project provided a unique opportunity, because it involved the design of the park and playfields as well as the landscape design for an adjacent school, major arterial streetscape, and a connected native bluff -top pedestrian/equestrian trail. The project tasks included the design and layout of three Little League baseball fields, children's play areas, a pedestrian walkway system, links to an adjacent elementary school, perimeter theme wall design, a centrally located restroom/concession building, all building, electrical, and encroachment pemutting, and electrical for Little League park fighting. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates. West Valley Recreation Corridor; Maricopa County, AZ (John F. Long Properties, Inc.) - This project involved recreational facility master planning for the development of a trail system that would traverse the Agua Fria River corridor from the Waddel Dam to the Gila River, well over a distance of 30 miles. The concept for a recreational trail along this corridor was developed for John F. Long Properties, Inc. and established the design theme and approach that Mr. Long has since taken to the various Cities and Towns that line the corridor, promoting the development of this recreational trail system. Portions of the project are currently under design by the surrounding communities and the concept is being adopted by those communities as open space in their planning and zoning endeavors. The original documents have assisted the adjacent communities in adopting rules and regulations for development of this open space associated with private and public development activities adjacent to the corridor. Rancho Del Mar Park; Mesa, AZ (City of Mesa) - Project Designer responsible for developing the final construction documents for this municipal park. The project tasks included the design and layout of basketball courts, children's play areas, hardscape design, pedestrian circulation, electrical for park lighting, and irrigation design. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates. Calbrisa Park; Peoria, AZ (City of Peoria) - Project Designer responsible for working with Mr. Engelmann on developing the master plans and final construction documents for this neighborhood park. The project tasks included the master planning of the park, public presentation, and the design and layout of park improvements. The plans included children's play areas, a pedestrian walkway system, links to an adjacent elementary school, and siting of elementary school habitat areas and restroom facilities. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates. Northpark Neighborhood Parks; Irvine, CA (The Irvine Company) - Project Designer responsible for developing the final construction documents for six neighborhood parks. The project tasks included the design and layout of hardscape and exterior wall theming, pool design, fountain design, centrally located restroom/ concession buildings, pedestrian walks, and electrical for park lighting. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates. Team Section Page 10 yrt�tx yi MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN HARRY WOELZLEIN, RLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION B.S., Landscape Architecture 1965 Michigan State University REGISTRATION Landscape Architect State of Arizona Team Section Harry spent more than 36 years at ADOT most recently in the Roadside Development Section as a Landscape Architecture Supervisor. His responsibilities included supervising design personnel and coordinating the work of the Landscape Architecture Unit, establishing work guidelines, carrying out Department policies for highway projects including erosion control, seeding, revegetation, landscaping and irrigation design, native plant salvage, architectural treatment of retaining and noise abatement walls, and topsoil salvage and re -use. As a Project Manager/Technical Leader for ADOT, Harry was also responsible for coordinating and monitoring the work of landscape architectural consultants on the State's interstate and primary routes, Maricopa Association of Governments freeways, and Transportation Enhancement Projects on a statewide basis. Harry has been preparing Design Concept Reports (DCR) for Premier's Landscape On -Call Contract withADOT. Harry has also been assisting Premier's landscape team on ADOT's I-10/I-17 Auxiliary Lanes project. ADOT projects designed and constructed include Interstate Safety Rest Areas and Roadside Parks on various routes and in various communities throughout the State including: Sacaton Rest Area on I- 10, Cedar Pocket Rest Area on 1-15, Parks Rest Area on I-40, Christensen Rest Area on I-17, Canoa Ranch Rest Area on I- 19. Roadside Parks include Father Kino Park in Nogales, a pocket park in Nogales, Miami Mining Park in Miami, Winslow Community Park in Winslow, Benson Historical Park and Fountain in Benson, Casa Grande Mini Park in Casa Grande, Prescott Founders Park on SR 89 in Prescott, City of Safford Rest Area and Visitor Center, City of San Luis International Border Rest Area. Native revegetation projects designed and constructed include: Interstate 10 from Ehrenberg — Quartzsite and on Interstate 10 from the South Phoenix City limits to Casa Grande. Page 11 Em MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN RICK CAMPBELL, LAIT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION B.S., Landscape Architecture 1993 California Polytechnic State University, San Lui, Obispo Team Section Rick has more than 6 years experience with design, site planning, recreational planning, construction documentation and observation. He has worked on a variety of projects for both private sector clients and public agencies, on the national, state and local levels as well as previously working for a firm that specialized in builder landscape packages for newly built subdivisions throughout the Phoenix Metropolitan area. Relevant experience includes the following: Sierra Heights; Mesa, AZ (Approx. 320Acres) - This project involved the development of a master -planned community for Lennar Communities Development in east Mesa. Rick was responsible for creating project design elements, streetscape landscaping, wall design, entry monumentation, signage, trail system, parks and open space design, irrigation design, and landscape construction documentation and specifications. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site. Gilbert Ranch; Gilbert, AZ (Approx. 640 Acres) - Gilbert Ranch is a mixed -use master - planned community in east Gilbert. Rick's responsibilities for the project included all of the streetscapes for the development, entry monumentation, wall plans, theme development, open space/park design, trail system that links the open space throughout the development and directional signage system that connects and directs the entire flow of traffic within the development. The work resulted in a complete set of construction documentation. Mesa Commons Trail and Landscape Project; Mesa, AZ (City of Mesa) - Lead Landscape Project designer responsible for assisting in the master planning efforts and in ?roduction of the final construction documents for this trail improvement and landscape idj acent to the Arizona Canal. The project tasks included the master planning of the available and varying right-of-way along the canal bank to include screening of a new wall that was under construction and continuation of the canal trail system. The services ncluded development of base information from as -built records and field measurements, ievelopment of the master plan, and final construction documents that included landscape ind irrigation plans. ;undance Park; Peoria, AZ (City of Peoria) - Lead Landscape Project Designer esponsible for developing the master plan, and design and layout of improvements for his neighborhood park located within the City of Peoria. Project tasks included the lesign of a new parking lot, trail system, multi -use fields, playground for several age ;roups, hard surface courts, landscaping, irrigation and linkages to the surrounding ieighborhoods and adjacent school. Page 12 JvNTA1N H�! Cl. MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION s TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN RICK CAMPBELL, LAIT �.. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - CONTINUED Neighborhood Improvements; (City of Glendale, AZ) - Rick was the Lead Landscape Designer for five neighborhood projects located in the City of Glendale. These projects involved meetings with each neighborhood association, developing the master plans, and final construction documents. These five projects were Santa Grande — Mary Silva Park improvements located at 45d' Avenue j ust south of Rancho Drive; Sahuaro Glenn — 63rd Avenue right-of-way landscape improvements; Wild Horse Ranch — right-of-way landscaping and entry - monument improvements on the north side of Sunnyside Drive from 591, Avenue east to 571 Avenue; Sunburst Farms — 51"Avenue right-of-way "Equestrian Trail" landscape design; and Santa Maria — right-of-way landscape design for the south side of Peoria Avenue from 53rd to 55th Avenues, the east side of 5511 Avenue from Mountain View Road to PeoriaAvenue, the west side of 53'd Avenue from just north of Heritage Elementary School to PeoriaAvenue, and the north side of Mountain View Road from 551 Avenue to j ust west of Heritage Elementary School. Project tasks included design and layout of streetscape improvements, entry monumentation, hardscape designs, drainage improvements, landscape and irrigation plans, and park design. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates. Master -Planned Communities; Rick provided complete landscape architectural packages for these private developments that included open space planning and design, recreation design, streetscape design, entry monumentation, and irrigation plans: Foothills Parcels 15C,D, & F, Phoenix, AZ Tatum Ranch, Carefree, AZ LMcDowell Mountain Ranch, Scottsdale, AZ Rancho Santa Fe, Avondale, AZ Clemente Ranch, Chandler, AZ Gilbert Ranch, Gilbert, AZ Highlands at Arrowhead Ranch, Glendale, AZ Mesquite Canyon, Mesa, AZ Boulder Creek, Mesa, AZ Mesa Northgrove, Mesa, AZ Sierra Heights, Mesa, AZ Cooper Commons, Chandler, AZ Kempton Crossing, Chandler, AZ Carino Estates, Chandler, AZ Kingswood Parke, Surprise, AZ Parkridge, Peoria, AZ Deer Village, Peoria, AZ Team Section Page 13 _ _ SyMN4, McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ... �%w KURT MONTEI, ASLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION BS, Landscape Architecture 1998 Arizona State University Team Section Kurt will provide experience in the preparation of complete and accurate construction documents. He will be responsible for the development of project elements, irrigation plan production, and landscape construction documentation. His past experience with desert landscaping plans and plan sheet layout and development will be a tremendous asset to our team. Kurt has worked on a variety of prof ects for both private sector clients and public agencies. Kurt's prior experience involves working for a firm that specialized in builder landscape packages for newly built subdivisions throughout the Phoenix metropolitan area. His work included extensive streetscape and entry monument production for these clients. Relevant experience includes the following: Rio Salado Environmental Restoration; (Corp of Engineers/City of Phoenix) - Landscape Architect for this five -mile project which includes field investigations, the preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. Premier is responsible for the LandscapeArrchitectural planning, design and implementation. These services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities. Terramar Park; (City of Peoria) - Project Manager of this 25-acre parcel of land nestled in the far northwest valley. The site is very unique for an urban municipal park in that the site backs up to the native and undeveloped New River corridor and is composed of native undisturbed desert with the unique character of the Sonoran Desert and the site has several significant native wash corridors that traverse the site adding to the topographic and plant material diversity of the site. Premier was responsible for extensive public involvement with four public meetings attended on average at each meeting by over 100 citizens and the use of a general park survey to gather the pulse of the surrounding neighborhood. The result of this extensive input process is a park plan that is a balance of turf and open space, basketball courts, an urban skate park elements, extensive trail System, parking for up to 50 cars and a restroom. These elements were all designed to blend into the site and are all encompassed and wrapped around and through a preserved end enhance desert ecosystem including the protection and use of the native washes as ;ignifrcant features ofthe parks development. inn Groves (320 Acres); Chandler, AZ (Continental Homes) - Kurt was responsible -or creating project design elements, streetscape landscaping, wall design, entry nonumentation, signage, trail system, parks and open space design, irrigation design, and landscape construction documentation and specifications. This project utilized Sonoran )lant species indigenous to the site. Page 14 ENOINEERIN6 CORPOR/�TION �; µTAN yI 4i MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN KURT MONTEI, ASLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - CONTINUED Mission Valley (640 Acres); Casa Grande, AZ (Private Development) - Kurt was responsible for creating the conceptual open space plan, project design elements, streetscape landscaping, wall design, entry monumentation, signage, trail system, parks and open space design, and landscape construction documentation and specifications. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site. Stetson Hills (750Acres); Phoenix, AZ (Del Webb) - Kurt was responsible for the native plant salvage and inventory plans, landscape design and final construction documents for parcels 12 and 13. The work resulted in a complete set of construction documents. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site. Carino Estates (450 Acres); Chandler, AZ (Shea Homes) - Kurt was responsible for the landscape design and final construction documents for this entire development. This project utilized Sonoran plant species indigenous to the site. New River Kiwanis Park Master Plan; (Maricopa County Parks Department) - Assisted in master planning this 80-acre regional park. The site has been master planned to accommodate a community center complex, a multi -generational facility, kitchen, senior center, library, gymnasium, classrooms, weight room, family aquatic center, and a 400-person hillside amphitheater. The park design also included separate areas for a professional and therapeutic rodeo arena with improved covered spectator seating, a rodeo village center, little league baseball facilities, large corporate and individual hillside picnic ramadas, extensive trail network, restroom buildings, overnight RV camping zone, equestrian staging, and tent camping areas. Team Section Page 15 ENQINEERINO GORPORI�TION Nt,u.v y a \v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN .WN PATRICIA BUTLER, ASLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION BLA, Landscape Architecture 2000 Arizona State University Geography 1993 C KEVIN WALLIN Patricia has been involved in landscape architecture, engineering, and estimating for the past 17 years. Patricia will be one of the key people involved in accurately developing the final master plan and construction documents into electronic format. Patricia has assisted Jeff Engelmann most recently on Mesa Grande Park in Mesa, Carr McNatt Park renovations in Casa Grande, and Sossaman Road Landscape Enhancements in Mesa. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT Kevin has been involved in landscape architecture, engineering, and cost estimating for the past 9 years. Within that period, he has honed his skills as both a designer and technician. He has extensive training and experience in the utilization ofAutoCAD, MicroStation and other Cadd software. Kevin assisted Jeff Engelmann on the O'Neil Park Renovations, Shamrock MHP, Sweetwater Estates, Olive Green Villas, Wild Horse Ranch, and El Caminito for the City of Glendale and Neighborhood Parks at Calbrisa, Sunnyslope, Windrose, Sundance, and Country Meadows Parks for the City of Peoria. Kevin also recently assisted in the production of the New River Kiwanis Park Master Plan for Maricopa County. Team Section Page 16 'STAIN & v MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN a.. ,%W yew n Mpd JEFF HOLZMEISTER, P.E. LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - DRAINAGE EDUCATION M.S., Water Resources Engineering, 1988 University of Kansas B.S., Civil Engineering, 1983 University of Kansas REGISTRATION Professional Engineei - Civil State of Arizona State of Nevada Team Section Jeff is a Principal of Premier Engineering Corporation with over 18 years of engineering experience and has been involved in a wide variety of proj ects throughout Arizona. Jeff provides management and guidance for project design and plan preparation, client coordination to ensure information essential to our design services is responsive and to the required standards, and he assists in the supervision of project development and office administration. Jeff's area of expertise is water resource engineering, requiring the analyses of surface water hydrology, open channel hydraulics, and sediment transport analyses. He has been involved in Drainage Master Plans, channel design, storm drain design and detention basin design services for local agencies and completed various on - site and off -site drainage facilities for the MAG freeway system. In addition to technical engineering analysis, the majority of these projects have also required the development of construction cost estimates, operation and maintenance plans, and benefit/cost analyses to determine the economic feasibility of a specific flood control or drainage plan. Jeff has managed and coordinated water resource projects with Fountain Hills, the FCDMC, MCDOT, ADOT and other local agencies. SR 87 from Shea Boulevard to McDowell Road; (ADOT) - Performed concept study for 51 drainage crossings for an 11-mile section of State Route 87. Design plans and specifications were prepared for this stretch from Mesa to Fountain Hills. Deer Valley Road Bridge over New River, Peoria, AZ (MCDOT) - Mr. Holzmeister is currently serving as Project Engineer for the Deer Valley Road Bridge project. He will be responsible for developing design alternatives for the proposed New River crossing. Design alternatives will include at -grade crossing, RCBC, and bridge. It is anticipated that a drop structure will be required for the project. Mr. Holzmeister will be responsible for the hydraulic analysis and sediment transport analysis for the project He will coordinate the design with the FCDMC, MCDOT, City of Peoria, City of Glendale, and private citizens. The design alternatives will integrate river alignments, trail systems, and architectural treatments recommended in the Middle New River Watercourse Master Plan. Upper Indian Bend Wash Regional Drainage and Flood Control Plan; (City of Scottsdale, City ofPhoenix, FCDMC, ADOT, COE, SLD) - Project included extensive HEC-1 modeling to develop runoff hydrographs for both existing and forecast future conditions. Hydrologic information was used to develop concept plans for a composite drainage system consisting of open channels, storm drains, detention basins, building setbacks, elevation pads, and reserved floodplain areas for the area north of the CAP. The study served as a foundation for development of the Desert Greenbelt and ADOT freeway system in north Phoenix and Scottsdale. Page 17 MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN JEFF HOLZMEISTER, P.E. `'�► LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - DRAINAGE - CONTINUED Tierra Norte, Sweetwaterphwe, and Steeple Hill Parks; (City ofPeoria) - Premier Engineering was responsible for developing the master plans and the final construction documents for these three pocket parks located within the City of Peoria. The project tasks included the master planning of each park, public involvement process at Tierra Norte, and design and layout of basin improvements at each of these three parks. The improvements to these existing sites included concrete walkways, picnic ramadas, new turf areas for open play, and drainage improvements into each of the facilities. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates developed throughout the design process. Mr. Engelmann has been retained by the City of Peoria to assist in construction observation of these three projects. Kiwansis Park Improvements; (City ofPeoria) Premier Engineering was responsible for developing the master plans and the final construction documents for this neighborhood park located within the City of Peoria. The project tasks included the master planning of the park, and design and layout of park improvements. The improvements to this existing site included concrete walkways, linkage to existing picnic ramadas, new playground equipment, lighting of facilities, and a new restroom building. Included with the plans were specifications and associated cost estimates developed throughout the design process. North Scottsdale General Plan; (City ofScoltsdale) - Project included extensive HEC-1 modeling to develop runoffhydrographs for both existing and forecast future conditions. Hydrologic information was used to develop concept plans for a composite drainage system consisting of open channels, storm drains, detention basins, building setbacks, elevation pads, and reserved floodplain areas for the area north of the CAP. The study served as a foundation for development planning in north Scottsdale. Grading and Drainage Experience: Rose Garden Estates; Fleet -Fisher Engineering Rim Top Ranch Mogollon Ranch; Fleet -Fisher Engineering 130' Street / Turquoise (Black Mountain Estate); Fleet -Fisher Engineering Troon Canyon Resort; Fleet -Fisher Engineering Sonoran Ridge Estates; Fleet -Fisher Engineering Granite Mountain Ranch (1441' Street / Lone Mountain Road; Fleet -Fisher Engineering Marble Mountain Ranch; Fleet -Fisher Engineering US Army Yuma Proving Grounds; Jason Associates Appaloosa Meadows, Phase 2; Kelly/Wise Engineering Mountain View Mobile Home Park; Kelly/Wise Engineering Luke Ranch 40 Acre Development; Makai Developers Village at South Mountain Drainage Study; Makai Developers Team Section Page 18 McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD _4 PAT FYIE, P.E. DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - CIVIL EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering 1972 University of Illinois REGISTRATION Professional Enginee - Civil State of Arizona State of Alabama State of Illinois State of Mississippi State of Tennessee State of Utah Pat has more than 29 years of experience in management, planning, and design of transportation, public works, and land development projects. His experience includes 8 years as the Public Works Administrator/County Engineer for Hamilton County, Tennessee, where he was responsible for a staff of 200 and the overall operations of the Public Works Division, which consists of Highways, Building Inspection, Sanitation, Engineering, and General Services. His experience with transportation projects includes airport facilities, highways, traffic systems, and land development. Pat also has extensive experience in analysis of river mechanics at highway crossings; designs for detention basins, storm drains, open channels, drop structures, and other drainage improvements; and supervision and coordination of surveying and planning for land development for residential, commercial, and industrial uses; transportation; water distribution; and wastewater systems. 10'i Street Area Streetscape; Chattanooga, TN (City of Chattanooga) - Design of 1,945 linear feet (LF) of streetscape in Phases I and II and 1,790 LF in Phases III and IV. Project consisted of sidewalk pavers, pedestrian lights, curbs, trees and other related improvements. Brainerd Road Streetscape; Chattanooga, TN (City of Chattanooga) - Design of 700 LF of streetscape including concrete sidewalks, curbs, pedestrian lights, trees and street resurfacing. Santan Freeway (202L) from Arizona Avenue to Gilbert Road; Chandler, AZ (F,a-thtech/AD07) - As Drainage Engineering Manager Pat was responsible for developing on -site hydrology for use in the design of a 150 cfs. pump station. Other responsibilities included the determination of storage facilities, wet well configuration and pump selection. Outer Loop Project; Phoenix, AZ (ADOT) - Project drainage engineer for the 52-mile Outer Loop Project. Responsible for development of hydrology, drainage design concepts, alternative systems, and final design and specifications. Prepared analysis ofriver mechanics at highway crossing of several waterways, designed detention basins, storm drains, open channels, drop structures, and other improvements. 24" Water Transmission Main — Kyrene Road to the Roosevelt Water Production Facility; Chandler, AZ (City ofChandler) - As Project Manager Pat was responsible for preparing the plans and specifications for this water transmission main on the Frye Road Alignment from Kyrene Road to the Roosevelt Water Production Facility with connections to the existing water distribution system. This water transmission main will help meet increasing water demands in Chandler. Team Section Page 19 `vrt,ux y� 4, McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION ` a TRAILHEAD r PAT FYIE, P.E. DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN `r.. LEAD PROJECT ENGINEER - CIVIL - CONTINUED Tumbleweed Park Phase III; Chandler, AZ (City of Chandler) - Pat was the Civil Engineering Manager responsible for design and coordination of side grading, drainage, paving, and utilities including the preparation of associated construction documents. Tumbleweed Park is a 190-acre park located on the southwest corner of Germann and McQueen Roads. Amenities that will be designed in Phase III include the extension of the internal roadway, a stage area, sidewalks, large group picnic areas, restroom, parking areas, lighting and landscaping. Premier was responsible for the design and development of construction documents for this phase of the park. Public Works Director, Chattanooga, TN (Hamilton County Government) - Responsible for overall operations of the Public Works Division, which consists of the Highway, Building Inspection, Sanitation, Engineering, and General Services departments. The Highway Department maintains approximately 900 miles of streets and highways. Codes and zoning enforcement are the primary functions of the Building Inspections Department. Operation of the county landfill facilities, transfer stations, and collection service to county facilities are provided by the Sanitation Department. Subdivision construction project management and other engineering services are provided by the Engineering Department. The General Services Department is responsible for custodial services, back -tax and surplus property management, and contracted services. Team Section Page 20 ENOINEERINO CORPORATION ,• MIcDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN MIKE LUECKER, P.E. PROJECT ENGINEER - CIVIL & DRAINAGE EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineerinc 1994 University of Missouri, Columbia REGISTRATION Professional Engii - Civil State of Arizona State of Kansas Team Section Mike has more than 7 years of experience in the study and analysis of detention basins, drainage systems, and developing HEC-1, HEC-2, and HEC-RAS computer models for the numerous watercourses throughout Arizona and Kansas. Mike has also had design experience in the preparation of roadway construction plans, incorporating data collection, field surveys, utility coordination, horizontal alignment, water, sewer and storm drain design and water and wastewater treatment facility design. Relevant experience includes: SR 101L Pima Freeway from Pima to Scottsdale Roads; Scottsdale, AZ (HDR /AD07) - As Design Engineer, provided on -site drainage services for the Pima to Scottsdale Road section, which required extensive coordination between ADOT, the City of Scottsdale, and the Corps of Engineers. Design of the on -site drainage system was significantly impacted by the City of Scottsdale detention basin design (Desert Greenbelt). Performed an in-depth review of the Desert Greenbelt Detention Basin report and plans in order to complete their design in accordance to the established criteria. Major tasks included hydrologic analyses, inlet design, storm drain analyses, and culvert analyses. Premier prepared construction documents, quantity and cost estimates for the project. North Campus Park Improvements; Casa Grande, AZ (City of Casa Grande) - Resident Observer responsible for general contract administration, reviewing and approving pay requests, shop drawings and change orders, observation of the work and providing design clarifications/modifications as needed during construction. Design Engineer for sanitary sewer located at this park. He prepared plans for approximately 800 LF of sanitary sewer. Ed Hooper Park Softball Facility; (City of Casa Grande) - Design engineer for the septic system of a 100-acre sports complex composed of four softball fields, and a building which accommodates restrooms, concessions area and maintenance equipment storage. He prepared plans and specifications for septic system with a design flowrate of 800 gallons per day. Granite Mountain Development; Maricopa County, AZ (Fleet Fisher) - Performed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for several unnamed washes in Maricopa County. The project required design of over fifty culvert crossings, floodplain delineation, and determination of finished floor elevations. Upon completion of the analysis, a drainage report, quantity and cost estimates were prepared. SR 89A; Cornville, AZ (Entranco /ADOT 97-83) - Major tasks consisted of hydrologic analysis and design of 46 culvert crossings and performing hydraulic analysis for 38 culvert crossings, within the 9-mile project limits near Sedona. Upon completion of the analysis, prepared the Initial and Final Drainage Report, discussing existing drainage problems, identifying possible solutions and developing drainage improvements. Page 21 ENOINE...N. CORPORATgN vNiA�N yi `<l McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN JONATHAN I. PEIFFER, AIA, NCARB LEAD PROJECT ARCHITECT (ROBERTS/JONES) EDUCATION B.A., Architect, 1992 Ball State Universitl B.S., Environmental Design, 1992 Ball State Universiq REGISTRATION Architect State of Arizona NCARB Certificate Team Section Jonathan Peiffer, a principal with RobertslJones Associates, has been active with the firm for nearly 10 years, starting as an intern. His work experience has ranged from public works, religious facilities, custom homes and planning, to commercial facilities. In addi- tion to his work experience with RobertslJones, Jonathan spent one year at Cella Barr Associates working on construction administration and ADA improvements for ADOT Rest Areas and the design of railroad themed details at McCormick Railroad Park. By the nature of many of these design challenges, creative thought and a high level of com- munication with the client has been required from project conception to project comple- tion. Jonathan enjoys many different responsibilities in the firm. In addition to design and man- agement, he makes office technology decisions, photographs completed projects, and has been instrumental in incorporating sustainable design practices into project specifica- tions. All of these roles have contributed to a firm commitment of constant improvement in providing the highest quality design services. Public Works • Apache Park, Scottsdale —Principal Architect • Sunset Point Rest Area Accessible Restroom Building—ProjectArchitect • Matazal Rest Area Construction Administration —With Cella Barr Associates • ADA Rest Area Improvements — With Cella Barr Associates • McCormick Railroad Park, Scottsdale — With Cella Barr Associates Religious • Gold Canyon United Methodist Church, Gold Canyon —PrincipalArchitect • Esperanza Lutheran Church, Phoenix — Principal Architect • Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church, Fountain Hills — ProjectArchitect • Pinnacle Presbyterian Church, Scottsdale — Green Specifications Writer Residential Brownstone at Hyde Park, Tempe — Principal Architect Norman Residence, Payson — ProjectArchitect Braucher Residence, Scottsdale — Project Manager McQuillan Residence, Scottsdale — Project Manager Historic Preservation I• Coronado Neighborhood Heritage Grant - Principal Architect • Laird & Dines Building, Tempe — Design Team Member Page 22 ENOINEERINO CORPORATION DESIGN EXCELLENCE is our focus Roberts I Jones Associates, Inc., since its inception in 1983, has consistently created award winning projects based on the philosophy of fully ad- dressing the client's needs in a site sensitive approach while maintaining he highest ideals of architectural design. We are dedicated to excel- lence in our practice of architecture by contributing to the building of a humane, and environmentally conscious setting. the TEAM APPROACH to design Our firm fully embraces and practices a team approach to design. Working closely with all members of the team we are adept at assisting with the continual decision -making process of design by way of team consensus, and maintaining a consistent focus on our client's needs and project goals. SUSTAINABILITY is integral to our design process As stewards of the environment, our team firmly believes that we should do as much as is practically possible to preserve our environment. We look at every project with the goal of shifting building practices toward sustainable approaches that conserve not only energy, water and other natural resources, but also preserving the environment and promoting a quality of life that is enduring over time. a high level of TECHNICAL EXPERTISE The use of appropriate technology is an important component in how we produce our work. All members of our firm utilize the latest technolo- gies available to provide maximum flexibility and speed in exploring alternate design solutions for our clients. We consistently produce designs that are completed on time and yield projects that are within the con- struction budget. our FIRM HISTORY Jim Roberts has been practicing architecture since 1974 when Jim and his former partner David Jones started their architectural careers with George Christensen. After a three year period as partners with George, Jim and Dave created the firm of in Roberts l Jones Associates. In August of 1993, David left Roberts l Jones to return .to his home in South Dakota. In 1999 Ray Eynon, Jonathan Peiffer and Troy Vincent were made share- holders of the firm. Roberts l Jones Associates has grown to include a staff of ten highly qualified individuals and enjoys a reputation of a highly creative and ward -winning design team. Presently, the concept of a team ap- proach to design, developed over the past several years, continues to provide our clients with a high degree of personal service while offering the combined talents of the design team to each project. AAA RaCMbIJonM AHa1.Ya1M, M1C. braucher residence desert mountain scottsdale, arizona :4& A linear plan was developed that followed the contours of the site to minimize cut and fill while acheiving the goal of separating the internal functions of the residence. Over 2000 survey points were taken to properly fit the patio and pool into the existing boulders along an active wash. The completed residence successful acheived the owner's goal for a unique desert design that relates to its site. Completion Date: 1995 This private residence, located in the desert mountain development of Scottsdale, presented a challenging design problem to fit the 3500 residence and outdoor patio areas on a site with several natural features. The plan of the residence was based upon minimum impact to the existing site, working with prominent views, and preserving natural site amenities in place. • RUDMSIJonw M�otlaln, Int. Iloyd residence desert mountain scottsdale, arizona Boulders on site located in the interior portion of the residence were made interior features and transi- tional peices between the living room and dining room and to the exterior. �,dverall, the residence is a proportioned blending of natural and human made materials that makes this structure a part of its desert surroundings. The Lloyd Residence is located at the base of Rose Quartz in the subdivsion named after this unique site feature of Desert Mountain. Devel- opment of this hillside residence presented several design challeges that were overcome through the design process. Existing promi- nent landscape and boulders were preserved in place while the residence took full advan- tage of the prominent views to the south and the north. Completed in 2000, this residence continues the tradition of desert sensitive design that has been a hallmark of the firm since its inception. AAA RaO�rpiJanw /usotlMa, Inc. pinnacle presbyterian church - phase I scottsdale, arizona Nir:ars ago, Roberts I Jones had the opportunity to st this growing congregation in developing its initial master plan. The first phase of the project consisted of a chapel and the first classroom wing. The 300 seat chapel actually functioned as the Sanctuary until December of 2001 when the final phase of the master plan was completed. Located on a 20 acre desert site in North Scottsdale, this first phases of the project took a sensitive approach to the context and full advan- tage of the natural features of the site including views, native plant materials and the existing washes. This initial phase set in motion a standard of design and integration to the site which ulti- mately resulted, through five phases, in a beautiful, sustainable campus for its users. Client Contact: Dr. Larry Corbet, Pastor Pinnacle Presbyterian 25150 North Pima Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 480.585.9448 Completion Date: 1993 AA • MaCwUlJanw bwdMw, Me. Experience � 'i�` :ti � !.�.• {do-^ 4 .{, i t �'� •�I� �� iL lo ��� � t � F. ,err►-•r-„ _ ,�zv- ,. ter. _ - r �?�t ` ' •.a � _:: kr` �' � �. �T}� •``, ��•� Aw c iJ `:1 FAT ai". 1 rf t � t Z . _. t.,.r. � .. -�'1. .. ,_ �. �t'i-(i: ♦ l� 3 � ��' � ;Yf' Y ✓r�'r fi r. � � �.i y � �' Jo-.q;,:.' •+� R ' '.l f• r : i♦ Yc. �1 v �s�s, hit " i � fT �i L '.l�'`r y• '"..•k„.. ♦.. to% . `.j1 j�'�� ,�6,',•* �lKj.'Gt _ ' 4'L'a1r' F�. c��,v. Y rrs '�` .� r.i'. it e ' r* :. �r'S} JWvC or A•.fit.*[ r..L�" J r� .. - A� ,t.2,+•/�yyY��C�Jy,?s ,va c 'j`(`�1t- .�. � Ys �.i'Y` '.� r ` `� / . �� }� M �ar .w J> �r'r.ly';�f�'' �F� �J�� •i • � . <�, Y < : ��, ''` 1 n 4}�p� 's - f ..'i:. �✓ ,0' ; , , Y�_ � i ., f ♦, t� f . A.�- • ♦ry r .+,�,�s r r rl � !'F P` i✓a ,' .. r '; ,;; t� .r�Li.' � `i_/'��/J `Yv '. � a C�a''`t ' 1. ,t�," ///J(( i yyy�u,�,,{ry .: ` sM±: •, t � sY r � v i s a� .. t,• 1, �� r i ..f 'i:r y..�^'� -*•� I� � .;�. `� i�� • y /.`' T�- '�' t♦ _ •<� ly �. Y `IG�-� ( rig'. 'A;• i)\ �! '�• 1Y;� '`:Irt •� '�•=^; fit: �7t � •>, �: 4 �► 'RY i � i / •7. TAF ':i 1 �_✓.. tlrS Ytr'� � -� 'f n +? M ...5 YZ.: � y �. , ti; ' �•. � � . p 'sy�' w i�� t��; ptir Y/ '. 7/ 2:- r ;;i •.`. � �4 "�� ,� ' r. �:. .r �) ' � , j .fib ,, �! 3 �s3,; •t��./ j r r SY' ,r. ♦ 1• ���J I: l� 1 y� r. i- �r��t- "*�'^'�'��� '��o- �^}: s t'� ,fir, / srj ►i `' i'IC'.i'.a ... ,r. .N yi °�NIMMcDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r S TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE APE PLAN A.s All PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS The Premier Team is skilled in planning and conservation techniques for desert open space and contextual project theming for projects thoughtfully integrated into the Sonoran Desert environment. The following are a few of the successful projects completed by our Team, which are most relevant to this Trailhead Design and Landscape Plan project. These projects have been completed on time and within budget. Project: Rio Salado Environmental Restoration Client: Corp of Engineers / City of Phoenix Contact: Walt Khsler Phone: (602) 534-2160 Construction Cost: $88 Million Dates of Service: 2001 - 2005 Relevant Features: Trails, Trailheads, Parking, Restroom Building, & Environmental Restoration This five -mile project included field investigations, the preparation of a Design Documentation Report (DDR) and Final Design Material consisting of contract drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and design analysis. The above design material shall be prepared with sound engineering and environmental considerations, engineering criteria (federal, state and local), USACE policy, applicable environmental regulations for the State of Arizona regarding development of landfill sites and NPDES permitting requirements applicable to the discharge of groundwater to the salt river. Premier is responsible for the Landscape Architectural planning, design and implementation. - These services include Habitat Restoration, Wetlands, Trails, Trailheads, Public Areas/Overlooks and Aesthetic treatments for all facilities. Project: TerramarPark Client: City of Peoria Contact: Kirk Haines Phone: (623) 773-7120 Construction Cost: $2 Million Dates of Service: 2001 - 2004 Relevant Features: Trailhead, Restroom, Desert Preservation, Parking, Master Plan, & Public Participation Terramar Park is a 25-acre parcel of land nestled in the far northwest valley within the City of Peoria. The site was selected by the City of Peoria for development into a neighborhood park for the northwest valley residence of this fast growing metropolitan area. The site is very unique for an urban municipal park in that the site backs up to the native and undeveloped New River corridor and is composed ofnative undisturbed desertwith the unique character of the Sonoran Desert and the site has several significant native wash corridors that traverse the site adding to the topographic and plant material diversity of the site. Premier was hired to consult with the neighborhood and the City of Peoria staff in the master planning of this desert park site. This effort included extensive public involvement with four public meetings attended on average at each meeting by over 100 citizens and the use of a general park survey to gather the pulse of the surrounding neighborhood. The result of this extensive input process is a park plan that is a balance of turf and open space, basketball courts, an urban skate park elements, extensive trail system, parking for up to 50 cars and a restroom. These elements were all designed to blend into the site and are all encompassed and wrapped around and through a preserved and enhance desert ecosystem including the protection and use of the native washes as significant features of the parks development. Experience Section Page 1 `W ni_,o MISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN N�� Project: Tempe Butte Trail Improvements (Individual Experience of Dean Chambers) Client: City of Tempe Contact: Jim Bond Phone: (480) 350-8897 Construction Cost: $250,000 site. Park features will include the historic core, Native American garden, conservatory/ amphitheater, community linkages, and the Phoenix Green, promontory and neighborhood park. Dates of Service: 1990 Relevant Features: Trail, Trailhead, Overlook, Desert Preservation, Native Materials, & Master Plan Design Guide Project Landscape Architect responsible for the design of the trails system for Tempe Butte including construction drawings for phase one implementation. Trail alignments followed existing scars to minimize visual/grading impacts on the fragile vegetative cover. Guidelines developed for Papago Park were followed in developing seating areas, trail markers and trail furnishings (benches, walls, trash receptacles and signage). The lower butte trail was designed for the physically handicapped with upslope trail beds offering more challenge for experienced hikers. Emphasis was placed on future expansion of trails within Papago Park to respond to future developments along the Rio Salado and downtown Tempe along Mill Avenue. Trail alignments addressed critical areas of drainage, erosion, visual impact and subsequent revegetation of disturbed areas of the butte. Project: Steele Indian School Park (Individual Experience of Dean Chambers) Client: City of Phoenix Contact: Jim Barke Phone: (602) 534-1870 Construction Cost: $14 Million Dates of Service: 1996 - 2001 Relevant Features: Trailhead, Trails, Desert Restoration, Restrooms, Parking, Interpretive Signage/Exhibits, & Native Materials Project Manager for a 75-acre park that will be a redevelopment of a historic Phoenix Indian School Project: Consolidated Canal Trail (Individual Experience of Dean Chambers) Client: City of Chandler Contact: Dave McDowell Phone: (480 0 786-2786 Construction Cost: $6.8 Million Dates of Service: 1998 Relevant Features: Trails, Trailhead, & Master Plan Project Manager responsible for the preparation of the feasibility study determining the potential recreation and transit uses along the canal. The study defines the parameters for the project, including goals, issues, constraints, ideas and improvements. Some of the improvements include trailheads, interpretive centers, multi -use ttmK signage, and lighting, drinking fountains and emergency call box. Project: Scottsdale Multi -Use Trails Master Plan (Individual Experience of Dean Chambers) Client: City of Scottsdale Contact: Scott Hameilton Phone: (480) 312-7722 Construction Cost: N/A Dates of Service: 2001 - 2002 Relevant Features: Trails, Trailhead, & Public Participation Dean Chambers is part of a Team providing planning and public involvement services for a comprehensive plan on Scottsdale's unpaved, multi -use trails. This Team oversees a multi -disciplinary team of landscape architects, planners, equestrian specialist and public Experience Section Page 2 ENGINEERING GORPORATI C�,:,_) N COMMISSION CAPE PLAN involvement specialist whose purpose is to update the City's system of over 300+ miles of trails, study the feasibility of implementing a new system of neighborhood trails and establish priorities for future acquisition, development and management. The project has identified a vision, themes and goals which promote the linkage of trails to other non -vehicular modes, thereby stressing both recreation and transportation. The Team will apply and modify, as necessary, the City's existing Trails Standards and Project: Scottsdale Desert Parks Design Guidelines (Individual Experience of Dean Chambers) Client: City of Scottsdale Contact: Gary Myer Phone: (480) 312-7722 Construction Cost: N/A Dates of Service: 2000 Relevant Features: Trails, Trailhead, Master Plan, & Desert Integrated Design Policies and will identify signature trails that will enhance Scottsdale's economy, culture and quality of life. An extensive public involvement process includes focus groups, a statistical survey, a website, newsletters, a Charrette, open houses and presentations before the City's Parks & Recreation, Transportation, Preserve and Planning Commissions and the City Council. Project: Cave Creek Regional Recreation Area (Individual Experience of Dean Chambers) Client: Maricopa County Parks Dept. Contact: Bill VanAnsdal Phone: (602)503-8675 Construction Cost: $3.5 Million Dates of Service: 1990 - 1996 Relevant Features: Trails, Trailheads, Parking, Signage, Restrooms, Desert Restoration/ Preservation, & Native Materials Dean served as Project Planner/Landscapew Architect for the master plan development and construction document preparation ofthis 2,500-acre regional desert park. The park is located in a mountainous desert setting and preservation of the natural features and wildlife was a primary concern. Site analysis of this desert mountain park included research into the vegetation, drainage and wildlife patterns, evaluation of archaeology found on the site and programming user needs. Dean created, in conjunction with the City of Scottsdale, the standards and objectives through which parks are to be created in order to capitalize upon the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert and meet the needs of the growing community. The guidelines are intended to assist in the evaluation of potential park sites and provide guidance in the development of future facilities. Project: Tumbleweed Community Park Client: City of Chandler Contact: Aaron Woodward Phone: (480) 782-2754 Construction Cost: $4,000,000 Dates of Service: 6/01- Current Relevant Features: Amphitheater Area, Extensive Trail System, Restrooms, Parking Lot, & Utility Extensions Premier provided the master planning design and development of construction documents for the Phase III portion of this community park. The improvements include the development of an open stage/ amphitheaters area that will accommodate the City's Ostrich festival, which is the City's largest organized event drawing hundreds of thousands of visitors each year. The park is also being designed to serve as a regional park with picnicking, restrooms, extensive trail system, historic farm recreations, and a future train museum. Premier is also incorporating parking lot, utility extensions and drainage improvements to this regional and community park. Experience Section Page 3 MT . JvtiTA1.Y y�! ��f MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r ." TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN Project: Peart Park Client: City of Casa Grande Contact: JerrySullivan Phone: (520) 421-8677 Construction Cost: $1,500,000 Dates of Service: 2001 Relevant Features: Amphitheater Area, Extensive Trail System, Restrooms, & Preservation of Landscape Premier provided master planning in cooperation with the community of an i existing historic 15-acre j 4 , ark. The improvements P included adding a space for social and civic events a small stage/ '. amphitheater, extensive trail system, restroom facilities, and linkages to the library and City Hall. The existing flood irrigation system was to remain and designed to accommodate the changes being proposed, and to incorporate a spray irrigation system (W in areas that would no longer be served by the flood irrigation. Preservation of the large eucalyptus trees that inhabit the park was one of the highest priorities. Project: Recker & Thomas Roads Community Park Client: City of Mesa Contact: Viesturs (Vic) Kalva Phone: (480) 644-2508 Construction Cost: $12,000,000 Dates of Services: 6/99 — 2/00 Relevant Features: Roadway Design, Multi -Use Trail System, Restrooms, & Parking Lots Premier provided master planning services for this new 140-acre community recreational complex. The planned improvements included four lighted and fenced youth baseball fields, restroom/concession facility, large tot lot/adventure play ground area, new entry, new maintenance building, major road circulation patterns, extensive pedestrian multi -use trails and several new parking lots. The master plan also includes the layout for three championship soccer fields, associated restroom/concessions buildings, and parking and pedestrian circulation within that area of the park. The park included community park aspects that included volleyball, basketball, skate park, and associated 300-car parking lot. This site included room for expansion into a community center complex that would include a multi -generational facility, gym, classrooms, weight room, and possibly an aquatic center. The park is awaiting voter approval for future development. Project: New River Kiwanis Park Client: Maricopa County Parks Dept. Contact: Ken Mouw Phone: (602) 506-4739 Construction Cost: $18,000,000 (estimated) Dates of Services: 6/00 —11 /00 Relevant Features: Hill Side Topography, Amphitheater Area, Extensive Trail System, & Retroom Premier provided master planning services for this 80-acre regional park in New River, Arizona. The park, which sits on beautifully lush hillside topography, is part of the Maricopa County Parks System. The master plan included approximately $18 million of site amenities and a community center complex, which includes a multi - generational facility, kitchen, senior center, library, gymnasium, classrooms, weight room, family aquatic center, and a 400-person hillside amphitheater. The park design also included separate areas for both a professional and therapeutic rodeo arena with improved covered spectator seating, a rodeo village center, little league baseball facilities, large corporate and individual hillside picnic ramadas, extensive trail network, restroom buildings, overnight RV camping zone, equestrian staging nodes, and tent camping areas. Experience Section Page 4 . . ENGINEERING CORPORATION Potentia Solutions � � w f -�• > _ e._ Y"�y yY+"y }a ,_ � I a ,r �',,,L�ii �°�,y, r , � \, � 1 � t .,r ::i, a �f.i":�'r:, � �1% r ��;: �,r.�,..•, xLL-I �„ �,°',y�,',�-.- :. rr -r �,'�:-4 '�.c .� �� r ; r'� . ♦ ,-. ��1t +. _(�d� M!''�SL�.`:�' �- �,j r Y��.. 'y :''z'�c-•+, .t'�, Yu$�..a,,y`-„ : y i>xt .w .8 • y' e•r"�,ir ,�"i1 `i dim.' is'`�•• >ti a � 'r'1"}5 ts^'7� R" �,. iI' pyy�� � t� +x �. t� .. Kam•, �� �...y S'"S`•i bs ' •• f,i"�' '� � �� S'�•�a _ ' iNZ ira �-► r _ iF 5'•'t '� �.. a ��,v :t l • i s r �F � P�* rp,-�, _t 'ti� t ::� � 'ter ,r•"F,-d4s ♦ rs . •� ice' ; �tr� J:��g �geyr � �.�'2S�i'ir''�".' .ia!� -AA-a ?r . �.. :,� i�i lw� r h � 4�'' a y _.* Sag.•• Y�a{,'�1. 0. RJ � ` _���. '-n..�1� S K ♦ '`1iiL A tj •.,; r��� ,;.'1"rv:- - .� .� f� �.. ,,,1 � •' •4. ' � � � y 1 � - I�Ny"�a yq:F ,'� rt� 1�Wi i }_'r Y� ♦ 1 ✓r �1= ` ><�� L"IR w,�'�'��i/�il'�`� .� � y ,•�.r..� �� , * ., eC'^'T,� •• ,ems r ac• +( 4. y'pra Iff' ^,5. ~ .•�� • : - ti', AVA 1, i -. ,} ~iyti �y .. ' '•� .r S P•`•ti •� ''t•�Y «� � y�,`�°'"7J�t�„ �'4 '`�`� �.�a� •',,.rS A � A�'!� ..'i�M ,�'. ,.Z �6p,. ,� � i y- ,off ;� � `. !" '� ` ^'++c '�� \ �• �' �, r •-1, �'' � 4 J��� J ; .�7�r R • 'r "�i�".�"r.'�•3rt': <;r? �,�r , t 1 ,�� d, y� i_ •r �'� AGE.,. - J � ti ! y { � ��.-Ty.w �"�r.� s\ �a i `� `� Inc fiI � � 'h� ya � . ' t, f ?�' M1+` .!���; � t to � .P � �� � t .., � M . • • tir• � r 14� . 'r . � •'� a `> yp� RR��t4l 1�,f' •I , 'ice •�J ( �:,•t _ ,'�� � d ws���� ♦ , e t�pv�t�3F .`.� '!F( 1 11 / 1jl ( � ��/y��J�', a'p c �' • 1 r}`Nal \ ��C'l.. .1�YI :�•i •7 Y I�4 a( .\, rc.. i i. ,. :�TF .F�f _ _. a•�'.!��•}[•.1_'.._ _ - __ i. L/t1Y.r'_� �. 11 F R� ktfkv lik Ilk"Ag odd Exit Set i�tif& *rA" Spa ces, LW A'A"o.W Into Saddle4M Screened by Hills, rade .,pnd Adsbc Ston4 Wills (Ruint fjlcby Fully A&*1:96y t-im " J. ", 1p -ow v / fj I 8tfS'PaNi)i;7ov&&v; -.j r. X0 4R" -14 NL 9b _!r -4 Y14 u r me re "e t-� ��t �'. _ ..._. = ; r. r� `ice i��'�t'�'1 :. dt`!S� 4AA � i 11 .. ow;ftirkir4a .4. 0 4 Hill 4— Ruld ww) i W ik vo A" n U -- 1 3 . 4rr14 -r f— . , I . C , I * ! ' t eX71 J At ierFf. �.v 7" ' 10 At -Z aT�N y� MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 1%WW 14 DESIGN IDEAS Site • Capture and emphasize natural viewpoints. Ideas: 360 degree overlook, view frame wall, - siting of overlook/view points, road alignment " • Shade pedestrian access points • Shade seating/picnic area • Earth integrated buildings, entry markers, walls, ramadas • Low profile and shielded lighting to reduce view from off -site i • Provide interpretive materials at overlook • Desert ethic stories etched into materials • Give meaning to facility location. Ideas: tell a story, create look of an ancient native ruins, facility becomes part of the draw, celebrate the desert Materials • Buildings, walls, roofs to be of native materials and colors blending with the natural desert m environment. Ideas: native stone, rammed earth, gabion baskets/native rock, rusticated stained concrete, rust patina metal, etc. • Utilize native and dark colors to reduce glare and visual impact • Scale and mass materials to surrounding environment • Native materials for functional uses. Ideas: stone bollards, stone cairns or trail markers, etched stone/concrete signage, stacked stone walls, specimen plant as sculpture • Use alternative paving materials for roads, emergency access and trails rusticated stained concrete, "eco" block, stabilized J decomposed granite, earth-crete, exposed aggregate Building • Set building and ramada into hillside to reduce mass and visual impact • Reduce building mass by breaking horizontal and vertical planes • Site building and road on existing disturbed areas • Orient/site building with environment as driving program factor Grading • Split road section to reduce cut/fill requirements and visual impact • Utilize split and varied road profile to reduce impacts Potential Solutions Page 2 M err ux y� <<� MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r " TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN • Lower parking lot and road where possible to reduce visual imp • Minimize parking areas into smaller pods for reduction in grad. • Provide natural surface/textural retaining walls in cut/fill areas • Maximum retaining wall height not to exceed 4 feet to reduce visual impact • Provide as many accessible access points, trails, parking to enhance user experience • Create water -harvesting areas to collect water from impervious surfaces and utilize for vegetative supplemental water • Stain cuts with environmentally sensitive materials to reduce visual impact Vegetation • Use native materials indigenous to site • Minimize areas of construction and grading disturbance to maintain existing vegetation • Utilize native seed mix methods for revegetation to reduce or eliminate need for irrigation system • Interpretive and educational opportunities with native plant specimens lar WaIIJPl-tinge Entry Drive Put Si gn FT El Potential Solutions Page 3 ENGINEERING CORPORATION e Fee Estimate 1 ,a 5•. � art.:• �� �� a ��` � _ c h J " -� ohs •��� rri�' ..3,.� �T AI ��1�f ,�f 3'i � ;.r f , A-• �tt'L1�•n ,sue / � f, s 1;/,. .' . 1 •�� �'_. .. K L -r� _`�,t � �`r� .�_4 ` � ,. 1 •,� •"� � � r, ? _I .�, �,f �w ` -'s •y J` �w *.r �• t.�'ov lot `� ,,,,tQ ' 3SRSf' - +'it` • •' It t .! �'� •.!� + .k �:c•. �y a • � 'ky � r � td . � � 1 j law Oki �r � _��` �`., � .� •` r FYI L``I � �� h J n 1 , ¢ S .�'�}�'' • . � �� 1 •�3� t • ,i ,� << �/r, / � 4+i14x4� t'/„�. a " � �,S ,� � . 1 t 1�\ � . � Z..a1l ja r `S �` �, �.. 'wv I i ; _ fi •r S. >• `r? q'd -r. .` + ,'`{�:,� .r't N011 It ;� '��4 �• � �► 4_ t', .,�,r •_.,• � �- fay. �• t♦ ,. ZA t .. ' +.�.. ti h- .K {-;�" ij' f �. 1. •� � �. �'"r-')CEN' �i'� �'t . � � ^� I E � ..ta►' l �� ; r, � , i^ `y ' � a+ n '• AJ i`'-�u;"rC .71d1� ' t' .,t � \ i� '� 1 ` e /`r• ♦ dyf ,f '�, '� , .1 ✓ - •:�,�• t%� �' �, " r fi�� „GIs, r u, rD {,�'• t, 'i 4`'i rS�•`, , ,� ;���(« ' '' to t OF 1 - . +1., � �+ �I'�•4+• i t j ,ys✓�-'•xi�� � "�t�.' ,. j • �wt�;:c.�• `-- +�+.�� �J ��•?• •``�1��f 1,14���"l{ i+'S� t�M v 'f �.y1`� •:a ~i!^-f`?p, '�' r} a� � s•+"� ,, �4e' . ' , •- *ram"'.h', �D Pq f. . E N•.. j NTAINy� ',• MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN PRESERVATION COMMISSION r5 TRAILHEAD DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN �rM AnaN FEE ESTIMATE No. Description of Tasks: 1.0 Inventory & Analysis 1.1 Project Brefing 1.2 Data Gathering Review 1.3 Site Inventory Existing Conditions 1.4 Site Analysis/Opportunities & Constraints 1.5 Prong Session Task 1.0 Sub -Total 2.0 Develop Plan Alternatives 2.1 Generate Alternative Concepts 2.2 Work Session w/ Staff/Preservation Commission 2.3 Cost Analysis 2.4 Test Alternatives 2.5 Work Session w/ StafllPreservation Commission Task 2.0 Sub -Total 3.0 Preliminary Master Plan 3.1 Refine Selected Alternative 3.2 Prepare Preliminary Plan 3.3 Cost Estimate Present Preliminary Master Plan & Cost to 3.4 StafllPreservation Commission Task 3.0 Sub -Total $ 2,500 to $ 3,500 to $ 3,500 to 4.0 Final Master Plan 4.1 Final Master Plan 4.2 Comprehensive Presentations to Staf]VTown Council Task 4.0 Sub -Total $ 3,000 to 5.0 Rough Grading Plan 5.1 Rough Grading Plan Task 5.0 Sub -Total $ 2,500 to Total �1 1 4200 4200 4500 3600 Sub -Total (Dollars) $ 15,000 $ 20,000 Estimated Expenses: Printing. Milage $ 250 to 1000 Total S 15,250 to $ 21,000 Fee Estimate Page 1 ENOINEERINO CORPORATION August 15, 2002 Interofice Memo To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL From: CASSIE HANSEN, DIRECTOR OF ADMINIST ION Date: 8/ 15/ 2002 Re: COUNCIL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS Staff has been requested to prepare some information on past council expense reimbursements to assist with the agenda item regarding constituent services that appears on the 8/15/02 agenda. The preliminary request was for reimbursements made to individual council members for the last four years including names, dates, purpose and amounts. Reimbursement checks are paid to individuals from the general ledger as opposed to accounts payable and are done manually. Detailed information is not available from the computer entry and can only be found by pulling actual requisitions and receipts. Staff pulled this detailed information on reimbursements that were made directly to council members and charged to the Mayor Council budget. These reimbursements can be found on the Mayor and Council Expense Reimbursements June 1998 — June 2002 report, attached. Additional information was requested to include funds expended from the Administration Department as well as the Mayor Council budget. It was to also include funds not necessarily reimbursed to individual council members, but funds expended to vendors on behalf of council members, i.e. airfare. To provide the most information in an �ditious manner, staff has run and attached ledger reports for both the Administration and Mayor Council kugets under account code 6548 Travel. This is the account that covers expenses including actual travel costs, mileage reimbursement, business meals, lodging, etc. It would be very time consuming for staff to pull all of the requisitions and receipts for all the general ledger expenses in the Administration Department for the last four years. Although not detailed, the ledger report provides the payee and an abbreviated transaction description. Staff has tried to highlight those expenditures made on behalf of council members from the Administration budget. A software conversion took place during fiscal year 1998/99. The ledger reports from that year are only available in the old format and show no detail, thus, they have not been included. Budget summary sheets have been included for the Mayor Council budgets for the last three fiscal years. They show what was budgeted and what was actually spent for line items such as Travel. Each Summary Report page has the Expenditure Journal page attached for 6548 Travel. The YTD Actual on the Summary Report page should match the sum of the General Ledger and Account Payable columns on the Expenditure Journal page. Reimbursements to council members appear in the General Ledger column. Expenditures made to vendors on behalf of council members appear in the Account Payable column. Although the ledger reports do not contain the detail of the Expense Reimbursement report, they provide information regarding both reimbursements made to council members from the Administration Department as well as expenditures made on their behalf. If the Council would like detail on any specific expenditure, staff would be happy to pull the historical documentation as required. The combined totals, including personal reimbursements and payments to vendors from both the Administration and Mayor Council budget, are summarized below: 1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002 $1,111.88 $943.46 $2,390.21 Page 1 of 1 Mayor and Council Expense Reimbursements June 1998 - June 2002 DATE INDIVIDUAL PURPOSE AMOUNT Four books to be give to the Kasterlee (Sister City) representative traveling with Mayor 11 /2/ 1999 Sharon Morgan Otten. $57.62 5/24/2000 Sharon Morgan Frame for pictures in the Court entry. $12.84 8/31 /2000 Sharon Morgan Frames for the Kasterlee photos. _ $304.50 Lunch at League conference. Breakfast meeting with Randall Gnant and Vice Mayor Sharon Hutcheson. Expenses for Sister Cities 9/13/00-10/3/00 Sharon Morgan visit - hotel, meals and taxi. $203.24 Lunch meetings regarding Plat 208 and lunch 10/ 19/00-11 / 14/00 Sharon Morgan for Sister City guests. $123.69 Lunch meeting regarding Mayor's Council for 3/ 1 /2001 Sharon Morgan Economic Development. $33.94 03/02/01-03/30/01 Susan Ralphe Mileage reimbursement for MAG forum series. $50.71 4/4/2001 Sharon Morgan Breakfast with President Pattea. $18.03 Flowers for Vice Mayor Wyman's 50th Wedding anniversary presented at the Council 6/21/2001 Sharon Morgan meeting. $32.13 11 / 16/2001 Sharon Hutcheson Dinner at League conference. $24.96 National League conference reimbursement - 12/5/2001 Sharon Morgan hotel, meals and taxi. $1,040.14 1 / 14/2002 Susan Ralphe Mileage to Luke AFB for elected officials event. $40.51 Sister Cities lunch meeting and Chamber 2/6/02 & 2/25/02 Sharon Morgan breakfast. $189.66 Meeting with Vice Mayor John Kavanagh, Sharon Hutcheson, and former Council 2/27/2002 Sharon Morgan Member M. Wiggishoff. $73.69 4/ 17/2002 Sharon Morgan Sister City conference supplies and food. $471.47 Framed pieces presented at the Alan 4/22/2002 Sharon Morgan Cruikshank dinner. $83.08 Meeting with the Scottsdale Police Chief - 5/31 /2002 Rick Melendez lunch and mileage. 1 $79.30 k Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 -General Fund 050 - General and Administrative 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000 GL Document Effective Function Code Name Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 Bank of America 113954 GILBERT COUNCI... 0.00 223.74 3/31/2000 10 6548 Bank of America 5113APR MAYOR'S CUP 0.00 105.00 4/30/2000 10 6548 Bank of America 5113/JU... TRAVEL EXPENSE 0.00 21.37 6/30/2000 10 6548 Basha's 1591640 FOOD/EXEC SESS... 0.00 29.47 6/29/2000 10 6548 Basha's 1591537 REFRESHMENTS 0.00 25.47 5/31/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 44566 EXPENSE REIMB... 60.45 0.00 4/1/2000 10 6548 Bev Bender 42364 Expenses 9.75 0.00 9/1/1999 10 6548 Bev Bender 43566 Mileage 82.55 0.00 1/4/2000 10 6548 Bev Bender 41836 Mileage Reimburse... 39.00 0.00 11/1/1999 10 6548 BEV BENDER 45093 MILEAGE/EXPEN... 65.50 0.00 6/1/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 45320 MILEAGE/EXPEN... 89.44 0.00 6/30/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 44823 MILEAGE/REFRE... 56.55 0.00 5/1/2000 10 6548 Bev Bender 42614 Reimbursement 80.86 0.00 10/l/1999 10 6548 BEV BENDER 43874 TRAVEL/EXPENS... 103.54 0.00 2/l/2000 10 6548 Cassie Hansen 43274 Mileage Reimburse... 23.40 0.00 12/1/1999 10 6548 Cassie Hansen 42578 Reimbursement LQo fv;- 235.24 0.00 10/l/1999 10 6548 Deb Feller 42612 Mileage 25.35 0.00 10/1/1999 10 6548 Debbie Feller 41848 Mileage 26.98 0.00 11/1/1999 10 6548 Don Thumith 42618 Mileage 14.43 0.00 10/1/1999 10 6548 Don Thumith 43565 Mileage 24.05 0.00 1/4/2000 10 6548 DON THUMITH 44834 MILEAGE 42.90 0.00 5/l/2000 10 548 ENTERPRISE REN... D523767 Van Rental/League ... 0.00 75.24 9/20/1999 10 6548 FOUNTAIN HILLS... 5561 DELIVERY SERVI... 0.00 17.00 4/30/2000 10 6548 FOUNTAIN HILLS... 5704 DELIVERY SERVI... 0.00 31.00 5/31/2000 10 6548 Ftn Hills Chamber o... 43890 CHAMBER GALA 320.00 0.00 2/l/2000 10 6548 Jane E Robinson 42359 Mileage 5.53 0.00 9/1/1999 10 6548 JOAN DORAN 44588 TRAVEL REIMBU... 17.88 0.00 4/l/2000 10 6548 JOAN DORAN 44300 TRAVELMILEAGE 17.87 0.00 3/l/2000 10 6548 John Wyman 42579 Reimbursement 161.38 0.00 10/1/1999 10 6548 Judy Hertrich 42586 Mileage 9.43 0.00 10/1/1999 10 6548 Judy Hertrich 43568 Mileage 19.18 0.00 1/4/2000 10 6548 Judy Hertrich 41862 Mileage 9.10 0.00 11/1/1999 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 44824 MILEAGE REIMB... 34.29 0.00 5/l/2000 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 44261 REIMBURSEMENT 19.50 0.00 3/l/2000 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 43864 REIMBURSEMENT 23.34 0.00 2/l/2000 10 6548 Linda Lemmen 42360 Mileage/Expenses 56.78 0.00 9/1/1999 10 6548 MICHAEL CICCA... 44286 MILEAGE 18.85 0.00 3/l/2000 10 6548 MICHAEL CICCA... 44573 MILEAGE REIMB... 25.03 0.00 4/1/2000 10 6548 MICHAEL CICCA... 43298 MILEAGE REIMB... 21.13 0.00 12/1/1999 10 6548 MICHAEL CICCA... 44245 REIMBURSEMEN... 55.51 0.00 3/l/2000 10 6548 PAUL NORDIN 45107 EXPENSE REIMB... 22.82 0.00 6/l/2000 10 6548 Paul Nordin 42349 Travel Reimbursem... 55.88 0.00 9/1/1999 10 6548 Pen Mower 42621 Reimbursement 64.93 0.00 10/1/1999 10 6548 PEN MOWER 43900 REIMBURSEMEN... 70.57 0.00 2/l/2000 10 6548 POMAS RISTORA... 608700 Accounts Payable I... 0.00 53.45 1/30/2000 10 6548 SUE DEGLER 44821 REFRESHMENTS/... 6.22 0.00 5/l/2000 10 6548 SUSAN DEGLER 45099 MILEAGE 16.57 0.00 6/l/2000 10 6548 SUSAN GRIGGS 45094 MILEAGE 13.33 0.00 6/l/2000 10 3548 Susan Griggs 42585 Mileage 12.35 0.00 10/1/1999 10 Date: 8114/02 10:41:21 AM Page. 1 GL Code 6548 6548 6548 6548 6548 6548 6548 6548 6548 Total 6548 Name Susan Griggs SUSAN GRIGGS SUSAN GRIGGS Susan M Degler Vendor: Vendor: Vendor: Vendor: Wallace B Hudson Report Total Date: 8/14/02 10:41:21 AM Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 - General Fund 050 - General and Administrative 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000 Document Effective Function Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 41868 Mileage Reimburse... 13.66 0.00 11/1/1999 10 44574 MILEAGE REIMB... 8.13 0.00 4/1/2000 10 43887 MILEAGE REIMB... 13.98 0.00 2/l/2000 10 42366 Reimbursement 27.32 0.00 9/1/1999 10 42107 Mileage 39.97 0.00 7/31/1999 10 41886 Reimb. S.F. Legal C... 512.14 0.00 11/1/1999 10 41883 Reimburse Mileage ... 12.77 0.00 11/1/1999 10 41878 Reimburse Supplies... 39.00 0.00 11/1/1999 10 42580 Reimbursement 123.04 0.00 10/1/1999 10 2,847.47 581.74 16.r Total 99999 - No Title 2,847.47 581.74 Total 999 - No Title 2,847.47 581.74 Total 050 - General and 2,947.47 581.74 Administrative Total 01 - General Fund 2,847.47 581.74 2,847.47 581.74 Page: 2 Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 - General Fund 050 - General and Administrative 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title kr, From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001 GI, Document Effective Function Code Name Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 JV 10-00... Corr Coding/Nordin... (290.00) 0.00 10/31/2000 10 6548 CR0228-... PN Travel Reimbur... (354.00) 0.00 2/28/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... Credit card charges 0.00 169.62 11/16/2000 10 6548 Bank of America 46631 CREDIT CARD C... 44.52 0.00 12/1/2000 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... February charges 0.00 640.50 2/28/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... June charges 0.00 179.00 6/30/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... March charges 0.00 47.42 3/31/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... November charges 0.00 58.95 11/30/2000 10 6548 Basha's 1672216 Lunch for admin me... 0.00 35.67 11/30/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 45605 EXPENSE REIMB... 98.84 0.00 8/1/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 48007 EXPENSE REIMB... 45.29 0.00 5/1/2001 10 6548 BEV BENDER 45832 MILEAGE 37.05 0.00 9/1/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 46071 MILEAGE REIMB... 64.35 0.00 10/1/2000 10 6548 BEV BENDER 47176 MILEAGE REIMB... 85.15 0.00 2/1/2001 10 6548 BEV BENDER 48845 MILEAGE REIMB... 37.94 0.00 6/29/2001 10 6548 BEV BENDER 46114 REIMBURSEMEN... 37.05 0.00 10/10/2000 10 6548 CASSIE HANSEN 46637 EXPENSE REIMB... 96.01 0.00 12/1/2000 10 6548 CASSIE HANSEN 48565 EXPENSE REIMB... 16.21 0.00 6/1/2001 10 6548 CASSIE HANSEN 45820 MILEAGE 15.92 0.00 9/l/2000 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 47229 EXPENSE REIMB... 32.50 0.00 2/1/2001 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 47492 EXPENSE REIMB... 31.74 0.00 3/1/2001 10 548 CHARISSA VERD... 48825 MILEAGE 41.05 0.00 6/29/2001 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 45801 MILEAGE 10.08 0.00 9/l/2000 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 46639 MILEAGE EXPEN... 12.03 0.00 12/1/2000 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 45583 MILEAGE REIMB... 15.28 0.00 8/l/2000 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 46067 REIMBURSEMEN... 7.15 0.00 10/1/2000 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 46116 REIMBURSEMEN... 16.90 0.00 10/10/2000 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 46917 REIMBURSEMEN... 12.35 0.00 l/l/2001 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 47768 TRAVEL EXPENS... 15.53 0.00 4/1/2001 10 6548 Charissa Verdugo 46348 Travel expense reim... 41.28 0.00 11/1/2000 10 6548 CHARLES FLECK 47187 EXPENSE REIMB... 32.57 0.00 2/1/2001 10 6548 CHARLES FLECK 46640 MILEAGE EXPEN... 43.75 0.00 12/1/2000 10 6548 CHARLES FLECK 46918 REIMBURSEMEN... 59.02 0.00 l/l/2001 10 6548 CHARLIE FLECK 46115 REIMBURSEMEN... 40.52 0.00 10/10/2000 10 6548 Daybreak Travel 0048501 Air fare for confere ... PO&II 0.00 290.00 9/30/2000 10 6548 JAMES WILLERS 48050 EXPENSE REIMB... 21.96 0.00 5/1/2001 10 6548 JOAN DORAN 48558 EXPENSE REIMB... 43.47 0.00 6/1/2001 10 6548 JOAN DORAN 48820 MILEAGE 21.74 0.00 6/29/2001 10 6548 JOAN MCINTOSH 47472 EXPENSE REIMB... 67.29 0.00 3/1/2001 10 6548 JOAN MCINTOSH 45598 TRAVEL REIMBU... 33.49 0.00 8/I/2000 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 45364 MILEAGE 50.25 0.00 7/3/2000 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 46929 TRAVEL EXPENS... 58.05 0.00 1/1/2001 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 47740 TRAVEL EXPENS... 29.24 0.00 4/1/2001 10 6548 JULIE GHETTI 48023 EXPENSE REIMB... 60.92 0.00 5/1/2001 10 6548 MICHAEL CICCA... 46659 MILEAGE EXPEN... 19.50 0.00 12/1/2000 10 6548 NANCY KNIHNIS... 48569 EXPENSE REIMB... 21.05 0.00 6/1/2001 10 6548 NANCY KNIHNIS... 48819 MILEAGE 21.05 0.00 6/29/2001 10 6548 PAUL L NORDIN 45833 EXPENSE REIMB... 14.44 0.00 9/1/2000 10 t i548 PAUL NORDIN 48578 EXPENSE REIMB... 32.87 0.00 6/1/2001 10 Date: 8/14/02 10:41:37 AM Page. 1 i Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 -General Fund 050 - General and Administrative 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001 GL Document Effective Function Code Name Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 PAUL NORDIN 48040 EXPENSE REIMB... 22.71 0.00 5/1/2001 10 6548 PAUL NORDIN 47214 EXPENSE REIMB... 26.08 0.00 2/1/2001 10 6548 PAUL NORDIN 47473 EXPENSE REIMB... 260.05 0.00 3/1/2001 10 6548 PAUL NORDIN 46933 LUNCH EXPENSE... 58.01 0.00 1/l/2001 10 6548 PAUL NORDIN 46052 REIMBURSEMEN... 78.59 0.00 10/1/2000 10 6548 PAUL NORDIN 46109 REIMBURSEMEN... 105.24 0.00 10/10/2000 10 6548 PETTY CASH 48833 PETTY CASH REI... 4.57 0.00 6/29/2001 10 6548 PETTY CASH 47474 REIMBURSE PET... 27.68 0.00 3/1/2001 10 6548 Petty Cash 46619 Reimburse Petty Cash 27.78 0.00 11/20/2000 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 46118 REIMBURSEMEN... 23.24 0.00 10/10/2000 10 6548 SUSAN DEGLER 48014 EXPENSE REIMB... 25.87 0.00 5/1/2001 10 6548 SUSAN DEGLER 47725 TRAVEL EXPENS... 30.49 0.00 4/1/2001 10 6548 SUSAN DEGLER 46939 TRAVEL EXPENS... 22.75 0.00 1/1/2001 10 6548 SUSAN GRIGGS 47195 EXPENSE REIMB... 24.84 0.00 2/1/2001 10 6548 SUSAN GRIGGS 46679 MILEAGE EXPEN... 22.75 0.00 12/1/2000 10 6548 SUSAN RALPHE 47483 EXPENSE REIMB... 71.57 0.00 3/1/2001 10 6548 THE CLUB AT CO... 110 Luncheon for East ... 0.00 555.82 9/30/2000 10 Total 1,673.62 1,976.98 6548 Total 99999 - No Title 1,673.62 1,976.98 Total 999 - No Title 1,673.62 1,976.98 Total 050 - General and 1,673.62 1,976.98 Administrative Total 01 -General Fund 1,673.62 1,976.98 Report Total 1,673.62 1,976.98 Date: 8/14/02 10:41:37 AM Page: 2 M Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal O1 - General Fund 050 - General and Administrative 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/2001 Through 6/30/2002 GL Document Effective Function Code Name Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 Andy Odendahl 52054 Expense reimburse... 51.10 0.00 6/27/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0198366... April charges 0.00 112.18 4/30/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223506... August charges 0.00 37.42 8/31/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... December charges 0.00 69.29 12/31/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0198366... February charges 0.00 75.24 2/28/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... February charges 0.00 83.37 2/28/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... January charges 0.00 78.08 1/31/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... July charges 0.00 50.81 7/31/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0198366... June charges 0.00 31.67 6/30/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0198366... March charges 0.00 171.59 3/31/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223506... March charges 0.00 121.77 3/31/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... March charges 0.00 81.50 3/31/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0198369... May charges 0.00 204.81 5/31/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... November charges 0.00 389.98 11/30/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 1022350... October charges 0.00 34.34 10/31/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... October charges 0.00 41.93 10/31/2001 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... September charges 0.00 456.13 9/30/2001 10 6548 BEV BENDER 49119 EXPENSE REIMB... 19.32 0.00 8/1/2001 10 6548 BEV BENDER 51281 EXPENSE REIMB... 53.29 0.00 4/l/2002 10 6548 Bev Bender 52040 Expense reimburse... 76.65 0.00 6/27/2002 10 6548 BEV BENDER 51556 MILEAGE REIMB... 31.76 0.00 5/1/2002 10 548 BILL FARRELL 49337 EXPENSE REIMB... 32.50 0.00 9/1/2001 10 6548 CASSIE HANSEN 50489 EXPENSE REIMB... 161.42 0.00 l/1/2002 10 6548 CASSIE HANSEN 51829 EXPENSE REIMB... 58.55 0.00 6/l/2002 10 6548 CASSIE HANSEN 49344 EXPENSE REIMB... 62.84 0.00 9/1/2001 10 6548 CHARISSA VERD... 49909 EXPENSE REIMB... 42.78 0.00 11/l/2001 10 6548 JOAN MCINTOSH 50502 EXPENSE REIMB... 10.35 0.00 l/l/2002 10 6548 Joan McIntosh 48868 Seminar expenses re... 37.49 0.00 7/1/2001 10 6548 JOHN WYMAN 49910 EXPENSE REIMB... 57.67 0.00 11/1/2001 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 50491 EXPENSE REIMB... 32.43 0.00 1/l/2002 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 49880 EXPENSE REIMB... 32.09 0.00 11/1/2001 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 49342 EXPENSE REIMB... 71.42 0.00 9/1/2001 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 49588 EXPENSE REIMB... 18.98 0.00 10/1/2001 10 6548 JUDY HERTRICH 51832 EXPENSE REIMB... 48.57 0.00 6/1/2002 10 6548 Judy Hertrich 52044 Expense reimburse... 5.12 0.00 6/27/2002 10 6548 MIKE CICCARONE 49872 EXPENSE REIMB... 21.39 0.00 1 l/l/2001 10 6548 MIKE CICCARONE 49331 EXPENSE REIMB... 12.08 0.00 9/1/2001 10 6548 NANCY KNIHNIS... 50182 MILEAGE REIMB... 37.95 0.00 12/1/2001 10 6548 PETTY CASH 49896 PETTY CASH REI... 7.00 0.00 l l/l/2001 10 6548 PETTY CASH 51037 REIMBURSE PET... 17.54 0.00 3/1/2002 10 6548 ROY R. PEDERSON 51306 ACTING TOWN M... 24.36 0.00 4/l/2002 10 6548 ROY R. PEDERSON 52052 Expense reimburse... 33.05 0.00 6/27/2002 10 6548 ROY R. PEDERSON 51036 EXPENSE REIMB... 44.56 0.00 3/l/2002 10 6548 ROY R. PEDERSON 51846 TOWN MGR SER... 22.80 0.00 6/1/2002 10 6548 SUE STEIN 51589 EXPENSE REIMB... 100.89 0.00 5/1/2002 10 6548 SUSAN GRIGGS 51024 EXPENSE REIMB... 14.44 0.00 3/l/2002 10 6548 SUSAN STEIN 51041 EXPENSE REIMB... 39.50 0.00 3/l/2002 10 6548 Susan Stein 52059 Expense reimburse... 31.28 0.00 6/27/2002 10 i548 SUSAN STEIN 49901 EXPENSE REIMB... 30.71 0.00 1 l/1/2001 10 Date: 8/14102 10:40:58 AM Page: 1 GL Code Name Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 - General Fund 050 - General and Administrative 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/l/2001 Through 6/30/2002 Document Effective Function Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 WALLACE HUDS... 51295 EXPENSE RERAB... 135.23 0.00 4/1/2002 10 Total 1,477.11 2,040.11 6548 Total 99999 - No Title Total 999 - No Title Total 050 - General and Administrative Total 01 -General Fund Report Total k4.. Date: 8/14/02 10:40:58 AM 1,477.11 2,040.11 1,477.11 2,040.11 1,477.11 2,040.11 1,477.11 1,477.11 ,5 -7 1 1) fldfl t t 2,040.11 Page:2 Account ... Account Title 5200 Wages and Salaries 5201 Employer FICA Expense 5202 Unemployment Insurance Ex.... 5207 Worker's Compensation Exp... 5915 Elections Expense 6501 Advertising/Signage 6503 Community Outreach Progra... 6520 Office Supplies 6548 Travel Expense Total 999 - No Title Total 99999 - No Title Total 020 - Mayor and Town Council Total 01 - General Fund Report Total Town of Fountain Hills Summary Expenditure Budget Report 01 -General Fund 020 - Mayor and Town Council 99999 - No Title 999 - No Title From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000 Percent Total Budget Current Period... YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Budget Vari... Remaining 26,400.00 26,400.00 26,400.00 0.00 73.17% 2,019.60 2,019.60 2,300.00 280.40 74.14% 7.83 7.83 200.00 192.17 99.22% 207.68 207.68 100.00 (107.68) 70.75% 26,168.26 26,168.26 33,000.00 6,831.74 72.31% 13,092.43 13,092.43 8,500.00 (4,592.43) 55.62% 8,155.64 8,155.64 11,000.00 2,844.36 34.75% 4,439.52 4,439.52 3,500.00 (939.52) 57.72% 815.00 815.00 0.00 (815.00) 94.91% 81,305.96 81,305.96 85,000.00 3,694.04 69.99% 81,305.96 91,305.96 85,000.00 3,694.04 69.99% 81,305.96 81,305.96 85,000.00 3,694.04 69.99% 81,305.96 81,305.96 85,000.00 3,694.04 69.99% 81,305.96 91,305.96 85,000.00 3,694.04 84.99% —ro a_ -k -I�ro v ck &1-tN 6 e 4 )) i l 1. S S- Date: 8/14/02 10:41:44 AM Page: 1 GL Code 6548 Total 6548 Name Report Total Bank of America Date: 9/14/02 10:40:22 AM Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 - General Fund 020 - Mayor and Town Council 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/1999 Through 6/30/2000 Document Effective Function Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 5113/JU... KASTERLEE TICK... 0.00 815.00 6/30/2000 10 0.00 815.00 Total 99999 - No Title Total 999 - No Title Total 020 - Mayor and Town Council Total 01 -General Fund 0.00 815.00 0.00 815.00 0.00 815.00 0.00 815.00 0.00 815.00 Page: 1 Town of Fountain Hills Summary Expenditure Budget Report 01 - General Fund 020 - Mayor and Town Council 99999 - No Title 999 - No Title From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001 Percent Total Budget Account ... Account Title Current Period... YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Budget Vari... Remaining 5200 Wages and Salaries 35,200.00 35,200.00 36,000.00 800.00 51.11% 5201 Employer FICA Expense 2,692.80 2,692.80 2,755.00 62.20 51.13% 5202 Unemployment Insurance Ex... 121.95 121.95 400.00 278.05 84.76% 5207 Worker's Compensation Exp... 241.94 241.94 305.00 63.06 60.34% 5915 Elections Expense 7,845.44 7,845.44 25,500.00 17,654.56 87.24% 6501 Advertising/Signage 6,028.50 6,028.50 10,000.00 3,971.50 71.29% 6503 Community Outreach Progra... 300.00 300.00 1,000.00 700.00 80.00% 6505 Conferences 1,800.00 1,800.00 1,500.00 (300.00) 28.00% 6508 Dues & Publications 48.30 48.30 750.00 701.70 94.92% 6520 Office Supplies 2,549.28 2,549.28 3,500.00 950.72 63.58% 6531 Printing 613.32 613.32 0.00 (613.32) (100.00%) 6548 Travel Expense 848.65 848.65 3,000.00 2,151.35 94.70% Total 999 - No Title 58,290.18 58,290.18 84,710.00 26,419.82 69.22% Total 99999 - No Title 58,290.18 58,290.18 84,710.00 26,419.82 69.22% Total 020 - Mayor and 58,290.18 58,290.18 84,710.00 26,419.82 69.22% Town Council Total 01 -General Fund 58,290.18 58,290.18 84,710.00 26,419.82 69.22% Report Total 58,290.18 58,290.18 84,710.00 26,419.82 84.61% �o+ C, L --f—rdw (_k .bo4-\ ck e P -b 4 9 y 3- Y to Daze: 9/14/02 10:41:33 AM Page: 1 Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 - General Fund 020 - Mayor and Town Council 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/2000 Through 6/30/2001 GL Document Effective Function Code Name Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 JV 12-00... Corr Coding/Reimb... 123.69 0.00 12/15/2000 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... March charges 0.00 19.74 3/31/2001 10 6548 Daybreak Travel 45574 MAYOR SHARON... 349.96 0.00 8/l/2000 10 6548 FIREROCK COUN... 10171unch Lunch w/ Rep. Mar... 0.00 49.34 9/30/2000 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 47752 EXPENSE REIMB... 33.94 0.00 4/l/2001 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 48038 EXPENSE REIMB... 18.03 0.00 5/1/2001 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 46118 REIMBURSEMEN... 203.24 0.00 10/10/2000 10 6548 SUSAN RALPHE 48042 EXPENSE REIMB... 50.71 0.00 5/1/2001 10 Total 779.57 69.08 6548 Total 99999 - No Title 779.57 69.08 Total 999 - No Title 779.57 69.08 Total 020 - Mayor and 779.57 69.08 Town Council r Total 01 - General Fund 779.57 69.08 Report Total L Date: 9/14/02 10:40:33 AM 779.57 69.08 Page: 1 Town of Fountain Hills Summary Expenditure Budget Report 01 - General Fund 020 - Mayor and Town Council 99999 - No Title 999 - No Title From 7/1/2001 Through 6/30/2002 Percent Total Budget Account ... Account Title Current Period... YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Budget Vari... Remaining 5200 Wages and Salaries 35,000.00 35,000.00 36,000.00 1,000.00 2.78% 5201 Employer FICA Expense 2,677.50 2,677.50 2,755.00 77.50 2.81 % 5202 Unemployment Insurance Ex... 127.32 127.32 400.00 272.68 68.17% 5207 Worker's Compensation Exp... 353.71 353.71 305.00 (48.71) (15.97%) 5915 Elections Expense 36,201.45 36,201.45 36,000.00 (201.45) (0.56%) 6501 Advertising/Signage 23,481.97 23,481.97 11,000.00 (12,481.97) (113.47%) 6503 Community Outreach Progra... 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 100.00% 6505 Conferences 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 (200.00) (20.00%) 6508 Dues & Publications 0.00 0.00 200.00 200.00 100.00% 6520 Office Supplies 957.18 957.18 3,500.00 2,542.82 72.65% 6531 Printing 113.09 113.09 0.00 (113.09) (100.00%) 6548 Travel Expense 2,332.54 2,332.54 13,000.00 10,667.46 82.06% Total 999 - No Title 102,444.76 102,444.76 104,660.00 2,215.24 2.12% Total 99999 - No Title 102,444.76 102,444.76 104,660.00 2,215.24 2.12% Total 020 - Mayor and 102,444.76 102,444.76 104,660.00 2,215.24 2.12% Town Council Total 01 - General Fund 102,444.76 102,444.76 104,660.00 2,215.24 2.12% Report Total 102,444.76 102,444.76 104,660.00 2,215.24 51.06% I Date: 8/14/02 10:41:20 AM Page: 1 Town of Fountain Hills Expenditure Journal 01 - General Fund 020 - Mayor and Town Council 999 - No Title 99999 - No Title From 7/1/2001 Through 6/30/2002 GL Document Effective Function Code Name Number Transaction Descrip... General Ledge... Account Paya... Date Code 6548 Bank of America 0223506... June charges 0.00 58.58 6/30/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... June charges 0.00 42.28 6/30/2002 10 6548 Bank of America 0223511... September charges 0.00 221.95 9/30/2001 10 6548 PHIL'S FELLING S... 051602c... Dinner for 05/16/02... 0.00 90.00 6/30/2002 10 6548 Rick Melendez 52057 Expense reimburse... 79.30 0.00 6/27/2002 10 6548 SHARON HUTCH... 50180 EXPENSE REIMB... 24.96 0.00 12/1/2001 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 50504 EXPENSE REIMB... 1,040.14 0.00 l/l/2002 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 51031 EXPENSE REIMB... 189.66 0.00 3/1/2002 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 51302 EXPENSE REIMB... 73.69 0.00 4/l/2002 10 6548 SHARON MORGAN 51582 EXPENSE REIMB... 471.47 0.00 5/l/2002 10 6548 SUSAN RALPHE 50753 EXPENSE REIMB... 40.51 0.00 2/l/2002 10 Total 1,919.73 412.81 6548 Total 99999 - No Title 1,919.73 412.81 Total 999 - No Title 1,919.73 412.81 ® Total 020 - Mayor and 1,919.73 412.81 Town Council Total 01 -General Fund 1,919.73 412.81 Report Total 1,919.73 412.81 kw Date: 8/14/02 10:40:46 AM Page: 1 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MEMO To: Mayor and Town Council Through: Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager From: Mark C. Mayer, Director Parks and Recreation Department Date: July 26, 2002 Subj: Printing of the Compass and Just 4 Teens Publications BACKGROUND: The Compass is the Town's major means of distribution of information to residents, and is printed and mailed to residents every two months. Over the years and at Council's direction the document has evolved from a few pages, specific to the Parks and Recreation Department, with no color, to a twelve -page publication that now includes information from various other departments and other community organizations. These organizations are typically the local School District, the Senior Center, and the Fountain Hills branch of the county library. These organizations have not contributed to the cost of printing and distributing the Compass in the past. The cost of printing the Compass and the Just 4 Teens publications is bid and is renewable for up to three years with adjustments annually, based on the Consumer Price Index. We are currently in the third and final year of renewal. Staff approached the Council at the June 20, 2002, meeting with a request for approval of the renewal amount. Council approved the request but asked that the Department research methods to reduce the cost. Staff agreed to provide a report back to the Council regarding the steps that could be taken to reduce costs. PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Staff _ researched three methods to reduce the cost of printing the Compass. They included utilizing a lesser grade of paper, reducing the number of pages currently printed from twelve to eight, and reducing the number of colors the document is printed in which are currently four. Each would reduce the cost to varying degrees as outlined below. Current Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 Option #4 Paper weight 80# 70# 80# 80# 70# Number of pages 12 12 8 12 8 Colors 4 color 4 color 4 color 2 color 4 color Annual Printing $45,092.51 $44,677.17 $34,009.23 $37,326.82 $33,593.89 Cost 0 Annual Savings $415.34 $11,083.28 $7,765.69 $11,498.62 ASK Staff, in preparing the various options, did contact the Seniors, School District, and the Library, regarding whether they would be willing to potentially cover the cost of including their information in each edition of the Compass, and of the two organizations that we have received responses back from, both declined due to budget constraints. Council may recall that the full amount requested in the budget of $56,500, including printing, the bulk mailing permit and postage, was previously approved. Of this amount $48,381.50 was for printing. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has concluded that Option #4, which would reduce the number of pages to eight, reduce the weight of the paper but keep the four-color option, is the best alternative. The four-color option gives us the full range of colors for printing. With Option #4 the combined reductions would result in a savings of $11,498.62, without significantly reducing the overall quality of the document. In addition, staff will be publishing the Just 4 Teens in-house. This will result in an additional annual savings of $3,288.99. Combined, these reductions to the Compass and Just 4 Teens will total an annual savings of $14,787.61, some 31%. Due to the time constraints of printing and mailing the August/September issue prior to the August 1 deadline, and with no Council meeting scheduled in July, staff pursued Option #4 with our printer for this edition. We will continue to include information from other Departments in the Compass, and on a space available basis, other organizations at no additional cost to them as we have in the past. r^1,un vftw a 4 �• esT 19,09 that is DATE: TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: TOWN of FOUNTAIN HILLS Community Development Department MEMORANDUM August 9, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and Town Council Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat Staff Report Update; Case #S2001-16 Town Council unanimously continued the above referenced agenda item from the July 2, 2002 Town Council Meeting to the August 15, 2002 Town Council Meeting. The purpose of this memorandum is to update the Town Council on the issues and concerns surrounding this preliminary plat request, as directed by the Council at the July 2, 2002 Town Council Meeting. The Town Council's concerns along with Staff's responses are as follows: 1) Request for an independent Traffic Study to be prepared on the Town's behalf for the traffic and site line concerns presented by the public. Response: Please find attached, the request from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, for an independent Traffic Study to be performed by Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated July 10, 2002. Please also find attached, the Traffic Study and recommendations prepared by Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated August 9, 2002, and the memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 8, 2002, regarding Traffic Accident Evaluation for Sierra Madre. 2) Request for traffic speed enforcement and report by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. Response: Please find attached, the Traffic Enforcement Study prepared by Captain Scott Penrose of the Fountain Hills Sheriff s Office, dated August 5, 2002. 3) Request to provide the Sanitary District requirements for the proposed sewer pump lift station as they pertain to ADEQ and other governmental agency regulations. 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 Response: Please find attached, a letter from Ronald Huber, dated July 15, 2002. 4) Future Trail Plan as specified by the General Plan, adopted by Town Council on June 20, 2002. Response: The 2002 Adopted General Plan does not propose a future trail within Ashbrook wash, north of Sierra Madre Drive. A vote of the Town electors is required for the development within this Town -owned wash. 5) Request for the developer or the developer's representative to provide a written position on the wash development issues. Response: As the preliminary plat shows, there will not be any development activity, including drainage structures, within the Town -owned wash. Please find attached, a written position on the "wash issues", from Bob Sternfels, dated July 17, 2002. 6) Request for the Public Works Department to provide landscape maintenance of the vehicular site lines within the Sierra Madre Right -of -Way along the "Sierra Madre Estates" property frontage. Response: Please find attached, memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 1, 2002, regarding Maintenance of Medians. It has been verbally communicated to Staff that representatives from MCO Properties will be attending the August 15, 2002 Town Council Meeting, as requested by Town Council. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (480) 816-5138. Attachments: • Letter from Randy Harrel to Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated July 10, 2002 • Traffic Study prepared by Burgess & Niple, Inc., dated August 9, 2002 • Memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 8, 2002, regarding Traffic Accident Evaluation for Sierra Madre. • Traffic Enforcement Study prepared by Captain Scott Penrose, dated August 5, 2002 • Letter from Ron Huber, Sanitary District General Manager, dated July 15, 2002 • Letter from Bob Sternfels, dated July 17, 2002 • Memorandum from Randy Harrel, Town Engineer, dated August 1, 2002, regarding median maintenance along Sierra Madre Drive. • July 2, 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission and Staff Report (Town Council Packets only) 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS Ii N PO Box 17958 Fountain Hills AZ 85269 480-816 -5112 1�"�p,• FAX 480-837-1404 that LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Larry Woodlan/Burgess & Niple From: Randy L. Harrel, P.E., L.S. I Date: July 10, 2002 Re: Proposal for review of traffic features and sightlines for Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision Copy To: Tom Ward Art Candelaria Bill Farrell Sintra Hoffman Honorable Mayor & Council Jesse Drake Dana Burkhardt Ms. Janice Abramson North Heights POA 15411 N. Tepic Lane Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 Transmittal to L. Woodlan 7-10-02.doc SM Estates Traffic -Civil Engr Review.doc Page 1 of 2 Chron 130 w Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS % " 1 Off. Public Works Department Engineering Division 4atis July 5, 2002 Consultant Review Traffic/Civil Engineering Sierra Madre Estates -Phase I Subdivision (S2001-16) Back rground Sierra Madre Estates -Phase I is a proposed subdivision in the northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills, consisting of nine, one -acre lots. Lots 1-2 and 3-4 will access Sierra Madre Drive through two joint access driveways (and are required by stipulation to have on -site turnarounds, so that they will have pull -forward access onto Sierra Madre Drive), Lots 5-9 will access a new hillside -local classification roadway --Princess Drive --which will intersect Sierra Madre Drive about 400' west of Golden Eagle Boulevard, an existing major collector roadway. On July 2, 2002, the preliminary plat was continued by the Town Council until their August 15, 2002 meeting to allow time for an independent professional traffic engineering review of the traffic kw features of this subdivision, especially regarding the following items: F,vnluntion Evaluate the appropriate design speed for street/driveway intersections. Note that: • Existing Sierra Madre Drive roadway design speed - 25 mph • Existing Dove Drive/Sierra Madre Drive intersection design speed - 30 mph • Other existing Sierra Madre Drive street and driveway intersections - unknown; most predate the Town and were not calculated; many believed to rate at less than 25 mph. • Recent traffic/speed counts near Dove Drive: Volume 1367 vpd 15%-ile speed 29 mph 50%-ile speed 34 mph 85%-ile speed 39 mph • Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance requirements (Exhibit 16) vs. 2000 AASHTO GDHS requirements. • Review developer's plan/profile's grading adequacy to provide the needed street/driveway sight distance. • Calculate the required sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre onto the Lot 3-4 driveway G( DHS Case F), and evaluate whether it is met. o Residents have reported measuring the available sightline at 250'. o Staff calculated sight distance available is 290'. o Staff calculated sight distance required is 220'. 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 SM Estates Traffic -Civil Engr Review.doc Page 2 of 2 Chron 130 • Evaluate allowing Princess Drive to intersect Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve: o Subdivision Ordinance Section 305.D.7, states: ...Intersections on the inside of a horizontal curve on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer (See Exhibit 13). o Subdivision Ordinance Exhibit 13, which illustrates prohibited intersections. • Other critical traffic issue(s)... ? Deliverables • Advise staff of any additional field data, plans, and/or traffic counts needed. • One field review on -site with Town staff. • Prepare letter concerning the above evaluation items. Submit by August 12, 2002. • Attend 8/15/02, 6:30 PM Council meeting to discuss. Price • Lump sum. 0 Attachments (to follow) • Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat sheets • Subdivision Ordinance • Sightline drawings by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers, 15 pages • Left turn from Sierra Madre sightline drawing by Town at SME Lots 3-4 driveway • Town's Sightline criteria o Intersection sight triangle o Roadway sight triangle o Sight distance requirements (from Subdivision Ordinance) o Height of landscaping (Title ??) o Letter from R. Harrel to Greg Bielli re Eagle Ridge North and Eagle's Nest ISD and SSD dated 6/10/02 • Cover sheet from Sierra Madre Drive (25 mph design speed) • Paving plan for Dove Drive @ Sierra Madre Drive (30 mph design speed) • 6/4/02 memo from R. Harrel to D. Burkhardt re traffic speed/volume counts on Sierra Madre near Dove Drive 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 BURGESS & NIPLE Mr. Randy Harrel, PE, LS Town of Fountain Hills PO Box 17958 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 August 9, 2002 Re : Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision Traffic Engineering Review Dear Mr. Harrel: Burgess & Niple,Inc. 5025 East Washington Street This writing is in regards to the Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision proposed in the Suite 212 northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills consisting of nine, one -acre lots. Lots one and two Phoenix, AZ 85034 and lots three and four will access Sierra Madre Drive through two joint access driveways. 602 244.8100 Lots five through nine will access a new hillside -local classification roadway called Fax 602 244.1915 Princess Court that intersects Sierra Madre Drive west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. We have completed the following as requested by the Town: 1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for strealdrive intersections. 2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001 American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements. 3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and Town required streeddriveway sight distance. 4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO and Town requirements. 5. Evaluate Princess Court intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve. The following is a list of reference materials utilized during this review: ➢ Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat sheets ➢ Town of Fountain Hill's Subdivision Ordinance ➢ Sightline drawings by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers ➢ Left turn from Sierra Madre sightline drawing by Town at lots 3-4 driveway ➢ Town's intersection sight triangle ➢ Town's roadway sight triangle ➢ Town's sight distance requirements from Subdivision Ordinance ➢ Town's restrictions and pruning requirements within the sight triangle ➢ Letter regarding intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance for Eagle Ridge North and Eagle's Nest ➢ Record drawings of Sierra Madre Drive ➢ Paving plans for Dove Drive and Sierra Madre Drive intersection 9 1 August 9, 2002 Page 2 ➢ Memorandum g re ardin trafficspeed/volume eed/volume counts for Sierra Madre g Drive near Dove Drive ➢ Roadway functional classification system and transportation traffic counts exhibit from the 2002 General Plan ➢ 2001 AASHTO GDHS Also included later in this writing, are the following from the Town's Subdivision Ordinance: ➢ Table 1 — Road Standards Table ➢ Exhibit 6 — Limited Collector Road Typical Section ➢ Exhibit 7 — Minor Collector Road Typical Section ➢ Exhibit 16 — Sight Distance Requirements 1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for street/drive intersections. Design speed is a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway. The design speed should be a logical one with respect to the topography, anticipated operating speed, the adjacent land use, and the functional classification of the roadway. The design speed should fit the travel desires and habits of most drivers expected to use a particular facility. A consideration in selecting a design speed is the average trip length. The longer the trip, the greater the driver's desire to use higher speeds. Lower design speeds are generally applicable to local and collector streets through ® residential areas. They are also applicable to roads with winding alignment in rolling or mountainous terrain or where environmental conditions dictate. High design speeds are generally applicable to roads in level terrain or where environmental conditions are favorable. In evaluating the appropriate design speed for the street/drive intersections, several items were taken into consideration. The first includes the original design speed for Sierra Madre Drive. Based upon record drawings provided by the Town, the roadway design speed for Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to Montezuma Boulevard was 25 miles per hour (mph). Even though the design speed listed was 25-mph, most of Sierra Madre Drive may meet a much higher design speed. The second item is the 30-mph intersection design speed of Dove Drive with Sierra Madre Drive located across from lot number 8 of the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision. The other existing street and driveway intersection design speeds along Sierra Madre Drive are unknown. The last item is the recent measured traffic speed taken near Dove Drive on May 29, 2002 through June 2, 2002. The 85"' percentile operating speed was found to be 41-mph. Operating speed is the speed at which drivers operate their vehicles during free flow conditions. The 85"' percentile speed is usually the speed range used by most drivers, and it is the most frequently used means to measure operating speed associated with a particular location. It is desirable that the running speed of a large proportion of drivers be lower than the design speed. Speeds on roadways are governed by such factors as posted speed limits and turns into and out of driveways and intersections. The addition of driveways and streets will typically Burgess & Niple N Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 3 cause drivers to decrease their speeds. With the addition of the proposed driveways and street, one would expect to see a decline in the existing 85"' percentile speed. Sierra Madre Drive is approximately 1 mile long. Recent traffic counts taken 300 feet east and west of Dove Drive indicate that the two-way average daily traffic is 1,367 vehicles per day. Based upon Table 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance, these items would most closely resemble a minor collector. The existing roadway cross section of Sierra Madre Drive is similar to both a limited collector road (exhibit 6) and a minor collector road (exhibit 7). The minimum design speed for these cross sections are 25-mph and 30-mph respectively. The 2002 Town of Fountain Hills General Plan classifies Sierra Madre Drive as a minor collector. Per the Town's Subdivision Ordinance, the minimum roadway design speed for a minor collector is 30-mph. Normally the design speed selected to determine the various geometric design features would be based upon the topography, the adjacent land use, the functional classification of the roadway, and the anticipated operating speed. In this case, the measured operating speed cannot be ignored. The data obtained by the Town indicates that vehicles are operating at a speed closer to 40-mph. It is appropriate to use a 40-mph design speed to determine the intersection sight distances for the new driveways and Princess Court off Sierra Madre Drive. 2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001 American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements. Sight distance is the length of the roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. The available sight distance on a roadway should be sufficiently long to enable a vehicle traveling at or near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. We have reviewed the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance requirements (Exhibit 16) versus the 2001 AASHTO GDHS requirements for passenger cars. The following values listed are the minimum design intersection sight distance requirements per the 2001 AASHTO GDHS, and the Town's Subdivision Ordinance and are as follows: Town AASHTO Town AASHTO (30 mph) (30 mph) (40mph) (40 mph) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Lots 1 and 2 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 380 335 580 445 Right turn from the driveway 380 290 580 385 Lots 3 and 4 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 380 365 580 490 Right turn from the driveway 380 290 580 385 Princess Court Left turn from Princess Court 380 365 580 490 Right turn from Princess Court 380 290 580 385 August 9, 2002 Page 4 As can be seen above, the Subdivision Ordinance's sight distance requirements for g passenger cars is more than required by the 2001 AASHTO GDHS for each case. 3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and Town required street/driveway sight distance. The developer's plan/profile's grading for the above referenced street/driveway sight distances were reviewed and were compared to the AASHTO requirements for a 40-mph design speed and are as follows: Available/ AASHTO Provided Required (feet) (feet) Lots 1 and 2 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 500 445 Right turn from the driveway 380 385 Lots 3 and 4 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 380 490 Right turn from the driveway 380 385 Princess Court Left turn from Princess Court 380 490 ® Right turn from Princess Court 266 385 The available sight distance for a left turn from the lots 1-2 driveway is 500 feet. This meets the AASHTO requirements based upon a 40-mph design speed. For right turns from the driveway, no grading was needed in order to obtain the 380-foot sight distance. In order to provide the minimum 385-foot sight distance as required by AASHTO, grading. may or may not even be needed. For the lots 3-4 driveway, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already been shown may or may not even be needed to provide the minimum AASHTO sight distance requirements for a 40-mph design speed listed above. For the left turn from Princess Court, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already been shown will be needed to provide the minimum 490-foot sight distance listed above. For the right turn from Princess Court, the required AASHTO sightline distance of 385 feet ends in the intersection of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The alignment of this sightline intersects the existing north side curb and gutter just west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The area within this sight triangle shall be clear of any obstructions. Based upon a field visit and record drawings, the intersection sight distance can be obtained with the removal and or relocation of existing vegetation. Also, the developer is providing advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching the proposed Princess Court in each direction. Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 5 As shown on the previous page, the Town requires a minimum sight distance of 580 feet for a 40-mph design speed. The developer did not provide profiles indicating whether a 40-mph design speed can be met. The plans provided by the developer do meet the Town's 30-mph design speed. The 40-mph sight distance design speed should be analyzed. 4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO and Town requirements. We have calculated the required sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre Drive onto the lots 1-2 driveway, the lots 34 driveway, and Princess Court per the 2001 AASHTO GDHS to be 325 feet for each based upon a design speed of 40-mph. The driveway of most concern is the lots 3-4 driveway since it is located near a crest curve. The profile provided by the Town for this driveway shows an available sightline distance of 312 feet, and we concur. As a back check, we used the record drawings of Sierra Madre Drive to determine that the available sightline distance is at least 305 feet per AASHTO requirements. The lots 1-2 driveway and Princess Court meet the AASHTO minimum sight distance requirements for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive for a 40-mph design speed. The lots 3-4 driveway do not meet the AASHTO minimum 325-foot sight distance requirement for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive due to the existing roadway crest vertical curve. An advanced driveway approach warning sign for westbound vehicles approaching the proposed driveway must be installed. S. Evaluate Princess Drive intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve. As indicated in the Subdivision Ordinance, intersections on the inside of a horizontal curve on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer. Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to approximately 1,500 feet west is a divided roadway with landscaped median. From this location to almost 500 feet west, the roadway narrows from the aforementioned to two lanes. This is also the west end of the Sierra Madre Estates Phase 1 development. There is also one existing local street, Dove Drive, situated about 800 feet west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. It accesses residential properties on the south side of Sierra Madre Drive. The land along the north side of Sierra Madre is currently zoned residential and permits development. Management of driveway/street access to collectors is desirable. Access control should be used to reduce traffic congestion. Uncontrolled access will interfere with through traffic. The developer has combined driveways for lots 1-2 and lots 3-4 into two joint access driveways and has the driveways from lots 5 through 9 off of Princess Court. The developer has reduced the number of driveway entrances off of Sierra Madre Drive from nine to three. This reduces traffic congestion. The developer is also going to provide advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching eastbound and westbound proposed Princess Court. Burgess & Niple 09 Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 6 Our evaluation is that Princess Court entrance off of Sierra Madre Drive is preferred over having five driveway entrances. Princess Court can be located on the inside of a horizontal curve as long as the minimum sight distance is provided. If the minimum sight distance cannot be met, advanced warning signs must be installed on Sierra Madre Drive. As a final note, we recommend that the existing vegetation not only be relocated and/or removed to maintain the required sight distances, but also that the vegetation that does not require removal or relocating be maintained for years to come. This is for both the median and along the edge of roadway. Respectfully submitted, 17.4 P QJ Q�lession F a� 0ioa �Z\FtCAtF Patrick D. Osborne, PE o, �' 35799 c r` PATRICK D. Project Engineer OSBORNE Enclosures copy: Mr. Tom Ward, Town of Fountain Hills Larry Woodlan, PE Table 1 ROAD STANDARDS TABLE e Right -of- Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Reverse t n z Way 2-Way ADT Design Roadway Minimum Horizontal Curve Radius Speed Length Curve Length Tan ent' Hillside -Local 26' 40' 300' 20 MPH 1,500' 100, 100, 01 Local 321 50' 700 25 MPH 1,500' 200' 100, 0, Limited Collector 40 ' 82' 900 25 MPH 2,000' 200' 100, 0, Minor Collector 40' 60' 5,000 30 MPH 1 Mile 300' 150, Major Collector 56' 100, 7,000 35 MPH 2 Miles 500' 150, Minor Arterial 130' 22,000 45 MPH - ' 80' -incipal Arterial 160' 45,000 50 MPH -- ' 108' 46 Notes: Minimum length of tangent between curves in opposite directions (reverse cures). Reverse curves without tangent section between the curves are not permitted, except on local streets. Fourteen foot wide landscaped medians are required on limited collector roadways. 16 foot wide landscaped medians are required on major collector and minor arterial roadways. 20 foot wide landscaped medians are required on principal arterial roadways. All median widths are included in the pavement width as shown on the typical sections. Per the Town Engineer. October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-13 C� Exhibit 6 LIMITED COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION _JUJ < 0 m li Q < � W < 1 O U W W OJZ U1 mV)Cr z J a JOp W ZO N O !n < W W J U Con-2 < W <' In<w W O } J p am <�< 3�a oxV) O d O > w N !r w a N N a o 0 Q OW �p p - w� Jaa o0 00< o= �< V) r 0 w p < = O <a~w O O < w a wLu < W J < H � In Z F W In W a w X 0 X p wN w w �o m v> Ln a UJ00 ? z Z m J wa tO> J v > d < cn O Z Ln 2 Ci > Q O Li a w a z0 Za vpiW �< 0 M O O O ON��o a i� October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-16 3- Exhibit 7 MINOR COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION 0 n -7N/7 MI& �I Z a W Q J _Q U VI W � (n 1 W U a O @S U J " 21 Q J U w� U O D cr W O O Q 00 W U-L- N a >- mmZ QQW J j N 5 J w Q p O to cD W w N Qf _ 0 00� �t 00 Ln U Lj a � �a aaa D, 0 a October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-17 Exhibit 16 SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS 18' STREET ORI DER S EYE 10' ORII/EWA Y 4.25 FEET HIGH AREA MUST BE CLEAR OF SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS /nn l /AIT �z _ CENTER OF LANE (.. 5 FEET HIGH) D 04- D TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH) 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 D 240 300 380 470 580 710 840 CENTER OF LANE (3.5 FEET HIGH) 55 990 October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-27 Chron 163 O��'tAT11T I I N NOW 0 �3 b that is Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS Public Works Department Engineering Division MEMORANDUM 4 TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council ,I FROM: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer l t ✓� THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public Wootg* DATE: August 8, 2002 RE: Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision Traffic Accident Evaluation for Sierra Madre During the previous Council discussion regarding the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision, the issue of traffic safety along Sierra Madre was raised. Proposed safety measures at the new subdivision were as indicated on the Preliminary Plan Plat (and in the stipulations). Since then Staff has additionally reviewed the accident records for Sierra Madre Drive from 1990-2002, and we have compared those accidents to the accidents on SunRidge Drive since 1990. SunRidge Drive and Sierra Madre Drive are both collector roadways in the northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills. Sierra Madre is about half the length of SunRidge Drive, Sierra Madre Drive and SunRidge Drive each have a medianed section and an un- medianed section, and both have bike lanes. Traffic counts (counted in the year 2002, except as noted) are in the same range as follows: • Sierra Madre Drive @ SunRidge Drive (1997 count)- 800 vpd @ Golden Eagle Boulevard - 1500 vpd SunRidize Drive @ Golden Eagle Boulevard - 400 vpd @ Desert Canyon Drive (north leg) -1650 vpd @ Desert Canyon (south leg) - 2450 vpd @ Palisades Boulevard -3260 vpd Sierra Madre has a 25 mph posted speed limit (as set by the Road Districts), and SunRidge Drive has a 35 mph posted speed limit. Sierra Madre has had only 9 accidents in the last 12 years (1990-2002) as follows, whereas, SunRidge Drive has had 19 accidents since then (additionally, two parts of SunRidge Drive have only been open to traffic for only 3 and 6 years.) Sierra Madre Traffic Accident evaluation for Sierra Madre Drive.doc Page 1 of 2 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 Chron 163 TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS 0 Sierra Madre — 9 Total • @ Golden Eagle Boulevard — 512) • @ San Diego Circle — 3 (3) • @ San Tomas Place - 1 °" Accidents are since 1990. All of Sierra Madre, and 1/3 of SunRidge Drive (from Delgado Drive to Golden Eagle) were open to traffic in 1990. The remaining section of SunRidge Drive did not open until 1996 and 1998. (21 Sierra Madre or SunRidge Drive is a stopped street at this location. (31 Closer review indicates that two of these accidents on San Diego Circle were single vehicle accidents, which appeared to be related to construction on San Diego Circle itself, and didn't actually have any cause or effect from Sierra Madre. The above Golden Eagle/Sierra Madre accidents were at a stopped intersection and as of the San Diego Circle accidents are unrelated to Sierra Madre, there have only been two roadway accidents along Sierra Madre in 12 years -- a good record. In summary, Sierra Madre is a reasonably safe street as it currently exists, and can be expected to remain so after Sierra Madre Estates is constructed. /jb cc: Jesse Drake Dana Burkhardt Tom Ward Larry Woodlan/Burgess-Niple Art Candelaria Sierra Madre Traffic Accident evaluation for Sierra Madre Drive.doc Page 2 of 2 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE To: Sintra Hoffinan Town Manager From: Capt. Scott Memorandum Town of Fountain Hills I Fountain Hills SlZriff's Office Subject: Traffic Enforcement Study Joseph M. A,p.io, Sheriff Date: August 5, 2002 Introduction: On July 11 "', 2002 I was directed to provide a traffic safety study for the area of Sierra Madre Dr. west of Golden Eagle. This study would examine the elements of speed and safe driving . Study: The parameters of the study were as follows: The study was conducted during the hours of lam to 8pm seven days a week. The Sheriff s Office would use unmarked vehicles to enforce traffic laws. On all but two occasions, unmarked vehicles were used in an effort to appear less invasive due to the political climate of this street. In the area of Sierra Madre, enforcement vehicles were stationed at Dove Dr. Vehicles traveling over 10 mph were issued a warning while vehicles over 15 mph could be issued a citation. Enforcement action was divided into one -hour blocks with usually no more than one block per day. In order to keep spontaneity, some days went without enforcement action. A total of 16 days or approximately 16 hours were used for the Sierra Madre study. Comparison: A comparison street was used to add credibility to the Sierra Madre study. Sunridge Dr. was used for this comparison. Although Sunridge Dr is a 35 mph zone, this street was recommended by the Fountain Hills Traffic Engineering Department, due to the similar makeup it shares with Sierra Madre. Unmarked vehicles were also used and 11 days or approximately 11 hours were used for the Sunridge Dr. study. Enforcement vehicles were placed on Staghorn Dr. and Rhodes Ct. during this study. History: A three-year history of Sierra Madre Dr. and Sunridge Dr. shows at least 43 speeding citations for Sierra Madre Dr. and ten speeding citations for Sunridge Dr. Sierra Madre showed approximately 48 warnings for speeding, while Sunridge Dr. had 15. These figures include the recent study and all Marshal's Department statistics. L Findings: Total findings for the study revealed the following information. Average speed for Sierra Madre Dr. was 30.72 mph. Average speed for Sunridge Dr. was 37.55 mph. A total of 420 cars were recorded on Sierra Madre and 368 on Sunridge Dr. Although unmarked cars were used, it should be noted that as the study progressed the average speed seemed to decline. This could indicate that drivers had begun to notice that enforcement action that was taking place. This is quite common in traffic enforcement issues as word sometimes travels throughout the neighborhoods. Conclusion: This study was conducted in an effort to determine if a traffic safety hazzard was present on Sierra Madre Dr. Conclusions indicate that the average speed of 30.72 mph would not be considered excessive when determining traffic enforcement. I am, however, concerned that speeds of 49, 46, and 45 mph where documented. Therefore, while the average speed is not a concern, the Sheriffs Office will continue to enforce speed limits along Sierra Madre Dr. Other issues such as line of sight and parking will need to be addressed by the traffic engineers. Traffic Chart Sunridge Dr. Sierra Madre Speed Limit 35 mph 25 mph Total Vehicles 368 420 Average Speed 37.55 mph 30.72 mph + or — Speed Limit + 2.55 + 5.72 5 Highest Speeds 56951,48946946 49946945942942 Warnings Issued 12 35 Citations Issued 2 6 k LOUNTAIN HILLS SANITARY DISTRICT 16941 E. PEPPERWOOD CIRCLE ` FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ 85268-2901 (480) 837-9444 FAX (480) 837-0819 July 15, 2002 Randy Harrel, P.E. Town Engineer Town of Fountain Hills P. O. Box 17958 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269 Re: Sierra Madre Estates Dear Randy: This letter is written in response to your telephone conversation with me today concerning the Town Council's review of the Sierra Madre Estates plat prior to its approval or disapproval. The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) does not review sewer -related infrastructure plans in Maricopa County. That task has been formally delegated to the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD). The MCESD reviews plans simultaneously with the Fountain Hills Sanitary District (FHSD) after preliminary plats have been approved. MCESD reviews plans for conformance to minimum design standards (ADEQ Engineering Bulletin 11). They don't care if a sewer line is in a wash only that it is protected by damage due to scour from flow in the wash. FHSD's mimimum design standards are more stringent. Consequently, everything built within the District's boundaries are constructed to the higher standard. With respect to where and how Sierra Madre Estates is sewered, that decision is the authority of FHSD. There are a number of sewer options which are technically feasible, two of which are shown on the preliminary plat. The alternative presented by the developer which shows multiple lots being served by a pump station, while technically feasible, is not acceptable to either the District or MCESD. MCESD will not allow a pump station serving multiple lots to be operated by any entity other than the District. The District will not own and operate such a facility when there are other options. The evaluation of the other options will take place after preliminary plat approval. The Town Council would be wise to approve or disapprove the preliminary plat for Sierra Madre Estates based upon issues other than sewer since they do not have authority over sewer matters. Ultimately, if the Preliminary Plat is approved, the subdivision will require sewer approval from the District. The District's approval will be consistent with ordinances, laws and legal remedies available to it. Sincerely, Ronald D. Huber, P.E. General Manager /cjm LOUIS G. JEKEL ROBERT C. HOWARD, JR. ROBERT B. STERNFELS CH TINE E. PESTICCI'• DI _RADER OF COUNSEL ROBERT E. THOMSON JAMES E. MERRIMAN ••• Also admitted in California Also admitted in Connecticut'• Also admitted in Colorado and New York ••• Please reply to Fountain Hills office FOUNTAIN HILLS OFFICE Jekel. Howard & Sternfels, L.L.P. 16803 E. Palisades Boulevard Fountain Hills, Arizona 85268-3824 480 816-9985 fax 480 816-5342 r.sternfels@worldnet.att.net SCOTTSDALE OFFICE Jekel & Howard, L.L.P. 8283 N. Hayden Road, Suite 100 Scottsdale. Arizona 85258-2455 480 948-7060 fax 480 951-0463 PINNACLE PEAK OFFICE Jekel & Howard, L.L.P. 8900 E. Pinnacle Peak Road, Suite D-230 Scle, Arizona 85255-3622 480 948-7060 fax 480 951-0463 JEKEL, HOWAR 4TERNFELS, L.L.P. Attorneys at Law Wednesday, July 17, 2002 Dana Burkhardt Senior Planner Town of Fountain Hills 16836 E. Palisades Blvd. Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 Re: Sierra Madre Estates. Case Number S2001-16 Dear Dana: As I noted, the developer desires to comply with the law in every respect. As a result, here is the developer's response to the "wash issues." 1. Sewer Line. Conditioned upon the approval of preliminary and final plat, the developer will accept the sewer stipulations as written by staff. There appears to be other viable alternatives that may present a better solution than even alternative 2 as amended and therefore all parties (the Town, the developer and the Sanitary District) desire to keep the options open. At present the best solution may involve tying into the sewer line within the right of way. The developer's engineers are exploring this alternative now. Suffice it to say, however, that so long as prohibited by the wash ordinance, the developer will stay out of the wash. 2. Rip -Rap. Again, conditioned upon the approval of preliminary and final plat, the developer will accept staffs stipulations relativg to the w rip -rap. The developer amended it's plans to show that the rip -rap will be placed on its property and not in the wash. 3. Drain Pipe. Likewise, conditioned upon the approval of preliminary and final plat, the developer will accept staff s stipulations relative to the drain pipe. The developer amended it's plans to show that the drain pipe will be placed on its property and not in the wash. I trust this letter explains the developer's' position as you requested. If it does not, please give me a call. As you can see, it is the developer's goal to cooperate with you and your staff to create a beautiful addition to our Town in compliance with the law. ti 4 RBS/lnc cc: Bo Rajkovski Butch Larson Rytan LLC V.. Sincerely, 4611�1 Page 1 of 3 Chron 154 �.. a1111111 Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS % I �bo Public Works Department Engineering Division � is MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Coil 1 fw YEngineer��� FROM: Rand Harrel, Town THROUGH: Tom Ward, The Director of Public W DATE: August 1, 2002 RE: Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision Homeowners' Association Maintenance of Medians vs. potential turnover to the Town This letter addresses the question of whether a Developer/Homeowners' Association can or should maintain median and roadway frontage landscaping, versus Town maintenance as it relates to the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision. Sierra Madre Estates' preliminary plat stipulation #3 states: Provide a note on the Final Plat, as well as a recorded copy of the deed restrictions and the property owner's association by-laws, that would require each property owner to maintain their Right -of -Way frontage landscaping and vehicular sightlines, including the Sierra Madre median landscaping, in a manner that provides safe vehicular sight visibility as required by the Town Engineer. On Sierra Madre, the North Heights Property Owners' Association currently maintains the center median landscaping. At the proposed median -cut area, note 4 on page 6 of the Preliminary Plat appropriately indicates that at the proposed median reconfiguration: Acceptable reconstruction to be coordinated with North Heights Property Homeowners' Association Since 1995, the Town has normally accepted median landscape maintenance on public arterial and collector roadways (Sierra Madre is a public collector roadway) from a Developer or Homeowners' Association, subject to the following conditions: Receiving a request from that Developer or Homeowners' Association. Specific approval action of the Town Council (unless authorized in a previous Council action — such as a master plan, plat, rezoning, variance, etc). Correction of any deficiencies: landscape, ground cover, and irrigation. Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision HOA Maintenace of Median vs Potential turnover to the Town.doc 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 Page 2 of 3 Chron 154 Since 1995 the Town has gradually been requested to and has accepted landscape maintenance responsibility for most of the collector and arterial street median landscaping on public streets within the Town. However, the following public street medians are still currently maintained by Developer/Homeowner Associations: • Eagle Mountain Parkway (Shea Blvd to gate east of Summerhill Blvd) • Summerhill Blvd (Eagle Mountain Parkway to gate north of Mira Monte) • Palisades Blvd (Shea Blvd south to gate) • FireRock Country Club Drive (Shea Blvd to gate) • Shea Blvd (west of Technology Drive to west of Saguaro Blvd)131 • Technology Drive (north of Laser Drive to Shea Blvd)") • SunRidge Drive (Palisades Blvd to south of Delgado Drive) (2) • Desert Canyon Drive (full length) (2) • Siena Madre Drive (Golden Eagle Blvd to west of Dove Drive) • CopperWynd Drive (Palisades to west end; 3/4's of this is in Scottsdale) • Shadow Canyon Drive • Westridge Drive • Vista Drive • Avenue of the Fountains (Palisades to west of LaMontana)(3) • "Entrance" medians in front of gates — many locations • "Private" medianed roadways — many locations t'1 • "Local street" medians — many locations (1) (1) Based on consistency with previous Council actions. (2)Per Council approved "trade off of responsiblies". (3) Currently within the "initial" maintenance period. Developers must install their medians in accordance with the Town's Subdivision Ordinance, which states: 607-H Roadway Sight Lines. Landscaping materials proposed in or near right-of-way shall be approved at the discretion of the Town Engineer to ensure that roadway sight lines are maintained. Both Developers and Homeowners' Associations must maintain their median landscapes in accordance with the Town Code, which states: Section 11-1-8 It is unlawful for any person to maintain or allow any tree, hedge, billboard or other obstruction which prevent persons driving vehicles on public streets, alleys or highways from obtaining a clear view of traffic when approaching an intersection or pedestrian crosswalk. Frontage Landscaping Similarly, past staff recommendations and Town Council actions have consistently left frontage landscaping (between the street curb and the front yard or street side yard property line) with maintenance by the frontage property owner, in accordance with the above noted Town Code provisions. Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision HOA Maintenace of Median vs Potential turnover to the Town.doc 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 Page 3 of 3 Ctuon 154 The above long-standing Town "Policies" are consistent with the current recommended stipulations for the Sierra Madre Estates subdivision. /jb cc: Tom Ward Art Candelaria Jesse Drake Dana Burkhardt David Stepanek Sierra Madre Estates Subdivision HOA Maintenace of Median vs Potential turnover to the Town.doc 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 Sierra Madre T.E. Report.doc Chron 166 IL a � �• An 190 that is N Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS Public Works Department TO: Honorable Mayor and Council L� FROM: Randy L. Harrel DATE: August 9, 2002 MEMORANDUM RE: Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision Traffic Engineering Report Attached is the Traffic Engineering report of the above subdivision from Burgess & Niple, Inc. Staff is currently reviewing the report and will have analysis and evaluation comments available for the August 12th meeting. ME att. BURGESS & NIPLE Mr. Randy Harrel, PE, LS Re : Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision Town of Fountain Hills Traffic Engineering Review PO Box 17958 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 August 9, 2002 Dear Mr. Harrel: Burgess & Niple, Inc. 5025 East Washington Street This writing is in regards to the Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision proposed in the Suite 212 northwest quadrant of Fountain Hills consisting of nine, one -acre lots. Lots one and two Phoenix, AZ 85034 and lots three and four will access Siena Madre Drive through two joint access driveways. 602 244.8100 Lots five through nine will access a new hillside -local classification roadway called Fax 602 244.1915 Princess Court that intersects Sierra Madre Drive west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. We have completed the following as requested by the Town: 1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for streeddrive intersections. 2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001 American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements. 3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and Town required street/driveway sight distance. 4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO and Town requirements. 5. Evaluate Princess Court intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve. The following is a list of reference materials utilized during this review: ➢ Sierra Madre Estates Preliminary Plat sheets ➢ Town of Fountain Hill's Subdivision Ordinance ➢ Sightline drawings by Kirkham Michael Consulting Engineers ➢ Left turn from Sierra Madre Sightline drawing by Town at lots 3-4 driveway ➢ Town's intersection sight triangle ➢ Town's roadway sight triangle ➢ Town's sight distance requirements from Subdivision Ordinance ➢ Town's restrictions and pruning requirements within the sight triangle ➢ Letter regarding intersection sight distance and stopping sight distance for Eagle Ridge North and Eagle's Nest ➢ Record drawings of Sierra Madre Drive ➢ Paving plans for Dove Drive and Sierra Madre Drive intersection August 9, 2002 Page 2 ➢ Memorandum regarding traffic speed/volume counts for Sierra Madre Drive near Dove Drive ➢ Roadway functional classification system and transportation traffic counts exhibit from the 2002 General Plan ➢ 2001 AASHTO GDHS Also included later in this writing, are the following from the Town's Subdivision Ordinance: ➢ Table 1 — Road Standards Table ➢ Exhibit 6 — Limited Collector Road Typical Section ➢ Exhibit 7 — Minor Collector Road Typical Section ➢ Exhibit 16 — Sight Distance Requirements 1. Evaluate the appropriate design speed for street/drive intersections. Design speed is a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway. The design speed should be a logical one with respect to the topography, anticipated operating speed, the adjacent land use, and the functional classification of the roadway. The design speed should fit the travel desires and habits of most drivers expected to use a particular facility. A consideration in selecting a design speed is the average trip length. The longer the trip, the greater the driver's desire to use higher speeds. Lower design speeds are generally applicable to local and collector streets through residential areas. They are also applicable to roads with winding alignment in rolling or mountainous terrain or where environmental conditions dictate. High design speeds are generally applicable to roads in level terrain or where environmental conditions are favorable. In evaluating the appropriate design speed for the street/drive intersections, several items were taken into consideration. The first includes the original design speed for Sierra Madre Drive. Based upon record drawings provided by the Town, the roadway design speed for Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to Montezuma Boulevard was 25 miles per hour (mph). Even though the design speed listed was 25-mph, most of Sierra Madre Drive may meet a much higher design speed. The second item is the 30-mph intersection design speed of Dove Drive with Sierra Madre Drive located across from lot number 8 of the proposed Sierra Madre Estates Phase I Subdivision. The other existing street and driveway intersection design speeds along Sierra Madre Drive are unknown. The last item is the recent measured traffic speed taken near Dove Drive on May 29, 2002 through June 2, 2002. The 85`b percentile operating speed was found to be 41-mph. Operating speed is the speed at which drivers operate their vehicles during free flow conditions. The 85t' percentile speed is usually the speed range used by most drivers, and it is the most frequently used means to measure operating speed associated with a particular location. It is desirable that the running speed of a large proportion of drivers be lower than the design speed. Speeds on roadways are governed by such factors as posted speed limits and turns into and out of driveways and intersections. The addition of driveways and streets will typically Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 3 ® cause drivers to decrease their speeds. With the addition of the proposed driveways and street, one would expect to see a decline in the existing 85"' percentile speed. Sierra Madre Drive is approximately 1 mile long. Recent traffic counts taken 300 feet east and west of Dove Drive indicate that the two-way average daily traffic is 1,367 vehicles per day. Based upon Table 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance, these items would most closely resemble a minor collector. The existing roadway cross section of Sierra Madre Drive is similar to both a limited collector road (exhibit 6) and a minor collector road (exhibit 7). The minimum design speed for these cross sections are 25-mph and 30-mph respectively. The 2002 Town of Fountain Hills General Plan classifies Sierra Madre Drive as a minor collector. Per the Town's Subdivision Ordinance, the minimum roadway design speed for a minor collector is 30-mph. Normally the design speed selected to determine the various geometric design features would be based upon the topography, the adjacent land use, the functional classification of the roadway, and the anticipated operating speed. In this case, the measured operating speed cannot be ignored. The data obtained by the Town indicates that vehicles are operating at a speed closer to 40-mph. It is appropriate to use a 40-mph design speed to determine the intersection sight distances for the new driveways and Princess Court off Sierra Madre Drive. 2. Review the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance vs. the 2001 American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (GDHS) requirements. Sight distance is the length of the roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. The available sight distance on a roadway should be sufficiently long to enable a vehicle traveling at or near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. We have reviewed the Subdivision Ordinance's intersection sight distance requirements (Exhibit 16) versus the 2001 AASHTO GDHS requirements for passenger cars. The following values listed are the minimum design intersection sight distance requirements per the 2001 AASHTO GDHS, and the Town's Subdivision Ordinance and are as follows: Town AASHTO Town AASHTO (30 mph) (30 mph) (40mph) (40 mph) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Lots 1 and 2 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 380 335 580 445 Right turn from the driveway 380 290 580 385 Lots 3 and 4 Driveway _ Left turn from the driveway 380 365 580 490 Right turn from the driveway 380 290 580 385 Princess Court Left turn from Princess Court 380 365 580 490 Right turn from Princess Court 380 290 580 385 Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 4 As can be seen above, the Subdivision Ordinance's sight distance requirements for passenger cars is more than required by the 2001 AASHTO GDHS for each case. 3. Review the developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and Town required street/driveway sight distance. The developer's plan/profile's grading for the above referenced street/driveway sight distances were reviewed and were compared to the AASHTO requirements for a 40-mph design speed and are as follows: Available/ AASHTO Provided Required (feet) (feet) Lots 1 and 2 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 500 445 Right turn from the driveway 380 385 Lots 3 and 4 Driveway Left turn from the driveway 380 490 Right turn from the driveway 380 385 Princess Court Left turn from Princess Court 380 490 Right turn from Princess Court 266 385 The available sight distance for a left turn from the lots 1-2 driveway is 500 feet. This meets the AASHTO requirements based upon a 40-mph design speed. For right turns from the driveway, no grading was needed in order to obtain the 380-foot sight distance. In order to provide the minimum 385-foot sight distance as required by AASHTO, grading. may or may not even be needed. For the lots 3-4 driveway, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already been shown may or may not even be needed to provide the minimum AASHTO sight distance requirements for a 40-mph design speed listed above. For the left turn from Princess Court, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already been shown will be needed to provide the minimum 490-foot sight distance listed above. For the right turn from Princess Court, the required AASHTO sightline distance of 385 feet ends in the intersection of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The alignment of this sightline intersects the existing north side curb and gutter just west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The area within this sight triangle shall be clear of any obstructions. Based upon a field visit and record drawings, the intersection sight distance can be obtained with the removal and or relocation of existing vegetation. Also, the developer is providing advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching the proposed Princess Court in each direction. Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 5 As shown on the previous page, the Town requires a minimum sight distance of 580 feet for a 40-mph design speed. The developer did not provide profiles indicating whether a 40-mph design speed can be met. The plans provided by the developer do meet the Town's 30-mph design speed. The 40-mph sight distance design speed should be analyzed. 4. Review the sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre onto the lot 3-4 driveways and evaluate whether it meets the AASHTO and Town requirements. We have calculated the required sight distance for the eastbound to northbound left turn from Sierra Madre Drive onto the lots 1-2 driveway, the lots 3-4 driveway, and Princess Court per the 2001 AASHTO GDHS to be 325 feet for each based upon a design speed of 40-mph. The driveway of most concern is the lots 3-4 driveway since it is located near a crest curve. The profile provided by the Town for this driveway shows an available sightline distance of 312 feet, and we concur. As a back check, we used the record drawings of Sierra Madre Drive to determine that the available sightline distance is at least 305 feet per AASHTO requirements. The lots 1-2 driveway and Princess Court meet the AASHTO minimum sight distance requirements for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive for a 40-mph design speed. ® The lots 3-4 driveway do not meet the AASHTO minimum 325-foot sight distance requirement for left turns from the Sierra Madre Drive due to the existing roadway crest vertical curve. An advanced driveway approach warning sign for westbound vehicles approaching the proposed driveway must be installed. 5. Evaluate Princess Drive intersecting Sierra Madre on the inside of a curve. As indicated in the Subdivision Ordinance, intersections on the inside of a horizontal curve on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer. Sierra Madre Drive from Golden Eagle Boulevard to approximately 1,500 feet west is a divided roadway with landscaped median. From this location to almost 500 feet west, the roadway narrows from the aforementioned to two lanes. This is also the west end of the Sierra Madre Estates Phase 1 development. There is also one existing local street, Dove Drive, situated about 800 feet west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. It accesses residential properties on the south side of Sierra Madre Drive. The land along the north side of Sierra Madre is currently zoned residential and permits development. Management of driveway/street access to collectors is desirable. Access control should be used to reduce traffic congestion. Uncontrolled access will interfere with through traffic. The developer has combined driveways for lots 1-2 and lots 3-4 into two joint access driveways and has the driveways from lots 5 through 9 off of Princess Court. The developer has reduced the number of driveway entrances off of Sierra Madre Drive from nine to three. This reduces traffic congestion. The developer is also going to provide advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching eastbound and westbound proposed Princess Court. Burgess & Niple CJ ra Burgess & Niple August 9, 2002 Page 6 Our evaluation is that Princess Court entrance off of Sierra Madre Drive is preferred over having five driveway entrances. Princess Court can be located on the inside of a horizontal curve as long as the minimum sight distance is provided. If the minimum sight distance cannot be met, advanced warning signs must be installed on Sierra Madre Drive. As a final note, we recommend that the existing vegetation not only be relocated and/or removed to maintain the required sight distances, but also that the vegetation that does not require removal or relocating be maintained for years to come. This is for both the median and along the edge of roadway. Respectfully submitted, Patrick D. Osborne, PE Project Engineer Enclosures copy: Mr. Tom Ward, Town of Fountain Hills Larry Woodlan, PE Q�9tesslona/per ioa \rICA77, 35799 ° PATRICK D. cc OSBORNE t Table 1 ROAD STANDARDS TABLE Street Type Minimum Maximum Minimum Reverse Right -of- Maximum Minimum (Pavement Way' 2-Way ADT Design Roadway Radius Horizontal Curve Width) Speed Length Curve Length Tangent' Hillside -Local 40' 300' 20 MPH 1,500' 100, 100, 0' 26' Local 50' 700 25 MPH 1,500' 200' 100, 0' 32' Limited Collector 82' 900 25 MPH 2,000' 200' 100, 0' 40 ' Minor Collector 60' 5,000 30 MPH 1 Mile 300' 150' 40' Major Collector 100' 7,000 35 MPH 2 Miles 500' 150' 56' Minor Arterial 130' 22,000 45 MPH -- 80' opal Arterial 160' 45,000 50 MPH ' 108' 3 Notes: Minimum length of tangent between curves in opposite directions (reverse cures). Reverse curves without tangent section between the curves are not permitted, except on local streets. Fourteen foot wide landscaped medians are required on limited collector roadways. 16 foot wide landscaped medians are required on major collector and minor arterial roadways. 20 foot wide landscaped medians are required on principal arterial roadways. All median widths are included in the pavement width as shown on the typical sections. Per the Town Engineer. October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-13 11 04 Exhibit 6 LIMITED COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION Qz'O 2m Q October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-16 i 0 Exhibit 7 MINOR COLLECTOR ROAD TYPICAL SECTION -7N/7 M/Zl �f z Q Q An _Q 11 Li N " < 0 a J � m Q J H Q f] V W V N F K W 0 O Q of 00ui W W W 1 Ql m z ~ Q Q ui J O Z Z j J W Q O O O W ~ (N W OLi Uj O Li Uj W > > O 60 m O O W d to V U 0a aaa \.< �. V O O O �m ti O Ir October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-17 Exhibit 16 SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS IS' 5TRFFT �rl c Ef SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS CENTER OF LANE (.. 5 FEET HIGH) 11 TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH) 20 25 3O 35 40 45 50 55 D 240 JOO 380 470 580 710 840 990 Eq October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-27 . 08/15/02 10:23 $480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 001/007 0 JORDEN BISCHOFF MCGUIRE &ROSE P.L.C. LAW OFFICES FACSIMILE COVER SHEET RECEIVING PARTY TO: Sue Stein FROM: Douglas A. Jorden DATE: 8/15/2002 FIRM NAME Town of Fountain Hills TIME: 10:02 AM FILE NO: 7650.001 7272 E. INDL4N SCHOOL RoAD, Sutra 205 ScoTTsD,kLF, AR1z0NA 85251 TELEPHONE: 480-505-3 900 FACSrMILE: 4 80-505-3 901 DOUGLAS A. JoxDEN DiRzcr L xE: 480-505-3909 e-mail: atty@azlanduse.cam FACSIMILE NUMBER 480-837-3145 We are transmitting 7 page(s), including this cover page. Please call (480) 505-3900 to acknowledge receipt of this facsimile or to report transmission failure. COMMENTS: Sue Please put a copy of Mr. Jorden's letter in each Council member's box and distribute to staff members listed as carbon copies. Thank you for your help. Tammy Original ®will not follow. Original will follow by ❑ regular mail ❑ overnight mail ❑ messenger. Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from the nature of the transmittal, the information contained in this facsimile message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error or are not sure whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U. S. Postal Service. Thank you. 08/15/02 10:23 %Y480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF 12002/007 7272 E. INDIAN SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 205 JORDEN SCOTTSDALE, ARUONA 85251 B I S C H O F F TELEPHONE: 480-505-3900 FACSIM i LE: 4 80-5 05-3 901 M C G U I R E DOUGLAs A. JORDEN & RosE P.L.C. DIRECT I.1NE: 480-505-3909 o-mail: atryCdAzlanduse.com LAW OFFICES August 15, 2002 Mayor Jon Beydler Town Council Town of Fountain Hills 16836 E. Palisades Blvd. Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 Re: Siena Madre Estates — Phase I Preliminary Plat Dear Mayor and Council: I represent Bob Prather and Janice Abramson, who reside on Siena Madre Drive and Tepic Lane located to the west of a proposed subdivision known as Sierra Madre Estates — Phase 1 (the "Proposed Subdivision"). Ms. Abramson and Mr. Prather both travel on Sierra Madre Drive on a daily basis and have a personal interest in the safety conditions of that road. Because the preliminary plat for the Proposed Subdivision does not comply with the Subdivision Ordinance of the Town of Fountain Hills (the "Subdivision Ordinance"), we urge the Town Council to either send this matter back to the Planning and Zoning Commission or to deny the request for approval of the preliminary plat. The balance of this letter will explain the reasons for this request. ALL SUBDIVISIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE The Subdivision Ordinance, Section 205.C. 5, 6, 7 sets forth the criteria for the Council to use in deciding whether to approve, conditionally approve or deny a preliminary plat: 5. The Town Council shall consider the preliminary plat and the Subdivision Technical Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission requirements and recommendations. If satisfied that all objectives and requirements of this Ordinance have been met, the Town Council may approve the preliminary plat and make a notation of the Town Council's approval on the copy retained in the permanent Town Council file. 6. If the plat is generally acceptable, but requires minor revisions, the Town Council may conditionally approve the preliminary plat and the required 08/15/02 10:24 $480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 003/007 Mayor and Town Council Town of Fountain Hills Sierra Madre Estates August 15, 2002 Page 2 revisions will be noted in the minutes of the meeting. At the direction of the Town Council, the plat may be approved subject to the revisions in accordance with the stated conditions. 7. If all of the objectives and requirements of this Ordinance have not been met, the Town Council may deny the preliminary plat. (emphasis supplied) This same mandate that all subdivisions abide by the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance is restated in Subdivision Ordinance Section 301, which states: The purpose of subdivision regulation is to create functional, attractive developments, minimize adverse impacts on the community, and to ensure that future subdivisions will conform to the community's expectations. To accommodate this purpose, all subdivision plats shall conform to the following standards which are designed to result in a well -planned community without adding unnecessarily to development costs. (emphasis supplied) It is clear beyond argument that if a proposed subdivision plat does not meet ordinance requirements, the Town lacks the ability to approve that plat. THE TOWN LACKS THE DISCRETION TO CHANGE THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE'S SPECIFIC SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 305 of the Subdivision Ordinance sets forth the design criteria for streets. Subsections 7 and 9 of Section 305.D. are important to the current issue, they state: 7. Street intersections with more than four legs and Y-type intersections where legs meet at acute angles shall be prohibited. Intersections on the inside of horizontal curve on arterial, collector, or local streets shall be avoided, unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer (See Exhibit 13). 9. All street intersections shall be designed to meet minimum sight distance visibility requirements (See Exhibit 16). (emphasis supplied) 08/15/02 10:24 *&480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 004/007 Mayor and Town Council Town of Fountain Hills Sierra Madre Estates August 15, 2002 Page 3 The importance of the highlighted language in Subsection 7 is that the Subdivision Ordinance allows the Town Engineer to make exceptions to certain requirements. With respect to the Proposed Subdivision, the intersection of Princess Drive and Sierra Madre Drive is on an inside curve. Thus, the Proposed Subdivision would not be allowed "unless otherwise approved by the Town Engineer," which is obviously the case in this instance. In contrast, Subsection 9 requiring specific sight distances allows no such flexibility and refers to Exhibit 16 for the required minimum sight distance. A copy of Exhibit 16 is enclosed as Attachment No. 1. Exhibit 16 tells us that the appropriate minimum sight distance is a function of the traffic speed. The traffic speed counts performed by Town Staff (see Randy Harrell memo dated June 4, 2002), establishes that the 85`h percentile speed ranges from 38 to 45 miles per hour. The Town's consultant, Burgess & Niple, clearly states in its August 9 report to the Town that a 40-mile design speed is required.' The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 580 foot sight distance for the new intersections created by the Proposed Subdivision, and this distance cannot be changed by the Town. THE TOWN LACKS THE DISCRETION TO SUBSTITUTE AASHOTO REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS In its August 9 letter, Burgess & Niple seems to suggest that the appropriate sight distances should be based upon the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials ("AASHTO") Geometric Design of Highways and Streets ("GDHS'�. That suggestion fails to take into account the Subdivision Ordinance. As the Town Council has no ability to vary the explicit requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, the proper standard is not AASHTO, but what is explicitly required by the Subdivision Ordinance. In its August 9 letter, Burgess & Niple compares the sight distances provided by the developer to the AASHTO requirements and concludes that additional grading would be required to meet AASHTO. But, the Burgess & Niple letter fails to address what would be required to meet the Subdivision Ordinance. Attachment No. 2 to this letter is page 4 of the Burgess & Niple letter, modified to show the Town requirement (580 feet) and the sight distance deficiency. By way of example, consider the left turn from Princess Court. Attachment No. 2 shows that the developer has provided 380 feet of sight distance, AASHTO requires 490 feet (and more grading), and that the Subdivision Ordinance requires 580 feet. Thus, the plans for the Proposed Subdivision fail to meet ordinance requirements by 200 feet. This is just one example —see Attachment No 2 for more. it has been suggested that the warning signs are sufficient to remedy the sight distance deficiency. This is incorrect for at least two reasons. First, it is not allowed by the Subdivision Ordinance. Second, while warning signs such as the ones proposed may be appropriate for trying to make existing unsafe conditions safer, it is poor planning and poor policy to create a 1 Suggestions that a lower design speed be used are inconsistent with the facts and industry practice. 08/15/02 10:25 V480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF 2 005/007 Mayor and Town Council Town of Fountain Hills Sierra Madre Estates August 15, 2002 Page 4 new, unsafe condition and then attempt to remedy these newly -created conditions with warning signs. CONCLUSION I look forward to discussing this matter with you further this evening. I apologize for the delay in getting this letter to you, but since the Burgess & Niple report and other materials have only been recently released to the public, I'm sure that you appreciate that it took us time to consult with our own traffic engineer on these issues. Regardless of the timing, I believe that we all agree that the safety of existing and future town residents must be the Town's number one priority. What we ask is simple: the Town to follow its own Subdivision Ordinance. While the Town Council may ultimately decide to amend the Subdivision Ordinance to provide for less -safe sight distances, that is not the issue before the Town Council this evening. And, from a policy perspective, it is hard to understand why the Town Council would want to cut corners and ignore the Subdivision Ordinance simply to facilitate a particular configuration for this developer. Simply put, the Town Council is under no obligation to approve a plat that does not meet Town requirements. Indeed, the Town Council is obligated to not approve the plat. If that necessities the developer returning to the drawing board and losing a lot or two, or spending a bit more money, so be it. We do not quarrel with the notion that if a proposed subdivision meets all of the Town's requirements, then the subdivision should be approved. But, the rule should apply equally both ways. If the subdivision does not meet the Town's requirements, it should not be approved. Sincerely, Do 1 rden DAJ/tj h Enclosures cc (w/encl.): Sintra Hoffman Bill Farrell Tom Ward Randy Harrell Jesse Drake Bob Sternfels Bob Prather Janice Abramson f:\dati\wpdocs.daj\7650.001\Council lcncr 081502.doc 08/15/02 10:25 V480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF 1j006/007 18' STREET 10' DR/ VEWA Y CURB L INE CEO (3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Exhibit 16 SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS ORI VER S EYE U) >H K O -AREA MUST 8E CLEAR OF SIGHT 08STRUEIIONS _ ,__CENTER OF LANE (J. 5 FEET HIGH) October 3, 1996 Article III, Page 3-27 08/15/02 10:25 %Y480 505 3901 JORDEN BISCHOFF Z 007/007 August 9, 2002 Page 4 ATTACHMENT NO.2 As can be seen above, the Subdivision Ordinance's sight distance requirements for passenger cars is more than required by the 2001 AASHTO GDHS for each case. 3—Review t/se developer's plan/profile's grading for conformance with AASHTO and Town required street/driveway sight distance, The developer's plan/profile's grading for the above referenced street/driveway sight distances were reviewed and were compared to the AASHTO requirements for a 40-mph design speed and are as follows: Lots 1 and 2 Driveway Left turn from the driveway Right rum from the driveway Lots 3 and 4 Driveway Left turn from the driveway Right rum from the driveway Available/ �w�J Provided A6?u1reJ (feet) 500 590 380 s90 380 58d 380 Sfso AASHTO Def lrlelc/ Required (feet) 445 60 385 ZOD 490 Z o0 385 Zoo Princess Court Left turn from Princess Court 380 5:Fo 490 Z00 --�� Right turn from Prince s Court 266 526 � 385 - �1 0,5 % 510,Q}} /17 DAF ��?o�Z il 46E /A1 rt-�SKrro J The available sight distance for a left turn from the lots 1-2 driveway is 500 feet. This meets the AASHTO requirements based upon a 40-mph design speed. For right turns from the driveway, no grading was needed in order to obtain the 380-foot sight distance. In order to provide the minimum 385-foot sight distance as required by AASHTO, grading. may or may not even be needed. For the lots 3-4 driveway, the proposed plans show that grading is required in order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has -already been shown may or may not even be needed to provide the minimum AASHTO sight distance requirements for a 40-mph design speed listed above. For the left turn from Princess Court, the. proposed plans show that grading is required in order to obtain the required intersection sight distance. Additional grading to what has already been shown will be needed to provide the minimum 490-foot sight distance listed above. For the right turn from Princess Court, the required AASHTO sightline distance of 385 feet ends in the intersection of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The alignment of this sightline intersects the existing north side curb and gutter just west of Golden Eagle Boulevard. The area within this sight triangle shall be clear of any obstructions. Based upon a field visit and record drawings, the intersection sight distance can be obtained with the removal and or relocation of existing vegetation. Also, the developer is providing advanced warning signs for vehicles approaching the proposed Princess Court in each direction. Burgess & Niple TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MEMORANDUM TO: The Town of Fountain Hills Town Council FROM: Denise Ruhling, Plannef7ve-7— THROUGH: Jesse Drake, Interim Community Development Director DATE: August 15, 2002 SUBJECT: Request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow outdoor "deli" seating and a change of store operating hours to 5:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. Case number SU2002-05 This is a request to allow Fry's Food and Drug to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow a change in the store opening from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (making store hours 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.) at 14845 E. Shea Boulevard. See attached Staff Report for additional information. E* M TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT August 8, 2002 CASE NO: SU2002-05 LOCATION: 14845 E. Shea Boulevard "Eagle Mountain Tract C-3, a portion of parcel 1. REQUEST: This request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow outdoor "deli" seating and a change store operating hours to 5:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. PROJECT MANAGER: Denise Ruhling, Planner DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: W. Ralph Pew/Pew & Lake, P.L.C. OWNER: Fry's Food & Drug Stores EXISTING ZONING: "C-1" EXISTING CONDITION: Commercial LOT SIZE: 20.43 acres or 890,344 square feet SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: NORTH: Vacant Multi -Family; zoned M-1 and Residential existing homes; zoned ,%W "R 1-35" SOUTH: Firerock Golf Course existing; zoned "OSR" EAST: Firerock Driving Range existing; zoned "OSR" WEST: Firerock Golf Course existing; zoned "OSR" SUMMARY: This is a request to allow the applicant to provide outdoor seating for the existing deli and to allow a change in the store opening from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. (making store hours 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.). The existing facility is the major anchor for the shopping center a 237,675 square foot building with adjacent buildings to accommodate complimenting business. The site is 20.43 acres with lot coverage of 405,930 square feet or 45.5% (includes all proposed buildings) with allowable lot coverage of 534,206 square feet or 60%. Required parking, for entire site, is 332 spaces provided parking is 445 spaces. Required parking for Fry's only is 218 provided parking is 317. The proposed Outdoor seating will be approximately 200 square feet located on the south side of the building on the existing patio/sidewalk area. A proposed wrought -iron fence will enclose the area allowing ingress and egress to the seating area only from within the store. A proposed trellis will provide shading of the area. This proposal satisfies all ADA requirements for access to both the store and parking. EVALUATION: Per Section 12.04 Outdoor seating areas and Operation of commercial or professional activities M Guest House Case Number SU2002-04 between eleven p.m. and seven a.m. are subject to Special Use Permit in the C-1 zoning district. This property is buffered from residential housing by Firerock Golf Course (south, east and west) and Shea Boulevard (north). The nearest residence is located more than 400 feet from the lot line of the shopping center. The proposed outdoor seating is located more than 150 feet from the lot line and is completely contained upon the pad of the existing Fry's store. Hours of operation will not negatively impact the surrounding residential by creating significant noise or light intrusion. Approval of the operating hours will follow current trends of opening for other food stores in the Fountain Hills area. Currently Fountain Hills Basha's opens at 6:00 a.m. and Safeway at 5:00 a.m. The proposed seating area will provide a "sidewalk cafe" atmosphere to the deli area allowing residents the opportunity to enjoy a cup of coffee, bagel, donut or sandwich while relaxing or chatting with friends. The proposed operating hours will allow early morning shopping for those on their way to/from work or the early riser wanting to beat the heat or traffic. The proposed hours will not negatively affect traffic, just the opposite is likely with the convenience of early delivery hours easing truck traffic on the main roadways. The applicant has stated that a presentation was made at the Eagle Mountain Board of Directors June 2002 meeting and the Board voted to support the extended operating hours and outdoor seating. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their August 8, 2002, meeting and recommends approval and staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit for case number SU2002-05, "Fry's Food and Drug Store Outdoor Seating and Extended Operating Hours". Page 2 of 2 i �oJvT1IN gr, TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Date Filed n FFaepPaidC��� ,��yAccepted By � -1 -r Type of Special Use Requested Special Use Permit to allow a small butloor seating area adjacent to the Deli Department and to change the hours of operation to be 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. Address of Subject Property Zoning 14845 East Shea Boulevard, Fountain Hills, AZ $5268 Legal Description: Plat Block Lot(s) Eagle Mountain Tract C-3 A part of Parcel 1 Applicant Day Phone W. Ralph Pew/Pew & Lake, P.L.C. 480/461-4670 Address City ST Zip 10 Wpst Main Street Mesa AZ 85201 Owner Day Phone Fr 's Food & Drug Stores 623/907-1788 Address City ST Zip 9th Avenue Tolleson AZ 85353 Signature o ner I HERBY AUTHORIZE (Please Print) Date /j W. Ralph Pew/Pew & Lake, P.L.C. 6-4-02 TO FILE THIS APPLICATION. Subs eg and sworn before me this S- day of June 2XD9X.-• My Commission Expires 2dv Notary Public OFFICIALSEAL DESIREE FLORES Public - State of Arizona C-OD A I COPA COUNT Y Ye � N 4Notary 25 2003 Submittal Requirements (attach additional sheets): 1. Mailing labels (2 sets) with names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property and a map showing the 300 foot radius from which the names and addresses were derived. 2. 15 full size folded prints (preferably 24"X36") of the site plan showing minimum zoning requirements and the proposed development if the Special Use Permit is granted, as well as the exterior elevations. 3. 1 8.5" X 11" photostatic reduction of each of the above referenced exhibits. 4. Describe the proposed use, the operations of the use, and the facilities proposed for the land use. 5. A narrative describing any adverse impact the proposed land use may have on the surrounding properties and on the neighborhood and what steps will be taken to avoid these adverse impacts. TFH Case Number ree Schedule Attached wym Ur ruumAn r1U.- J U N 1 8 2002 Narrative Report Special Use Permit For Fry's Food and Drug Store located at Shea Boulevard and Eagle Mountain Parkway Fountain Hills, Arizona June 5, 2002 Fry's Food and Drug Store ("Fry's") respectfully requests that the Town of Fountain Hills approve a Special Use Permit for the recently opened Fry's at the corner of Shea Boulevard and Eagle Mountain Parkway to allow the following: 1. Authorization for a small (approximately 200 sq. ft.) outdoor seating area adjacent to the Deli/ Bakery portion of the Store. 2. Change in the hours of operation to allow the opening of the Store at 5:00am. Sections12.04 (C) and (D) of the Town's zoning code require the approval of a Special Use Permit by the Town Council for these uses. The request for outdoor seating is to allow an area approximately 200 sq. ft. in size to be located adjacent to the Deli/ Bakery area of the Store. This area will be surrounded by a wrought -iron fence so that the only ingress and egress to the seating area would be from within the store. The seating area will be covered with a trellis. The seating area will contain a few tables and chairs so that the customers can enjoy the outdoor seating atmosphere and relax while having coffee and other food items available at the Deli and Bakery. Since the opening of the Fry's store at this location, Fry's has determined that many of its customers prefer the early morning hours for an opportunity to complete food shopping and to pick up needed items. Some of Fry's customers, just like the customers at Basha's and Safeway within Fountain Hills, prefer early morning shopping. The Basha's in Fountain Hills opens at 6:00 a.m. and the Safeway opens at 5.-00 a.m. The two purposes for which the Special Use Permit is requested will not result in a condition on the property that would be inimical to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. In fact, providing for outdoor seating and the 5:00 a.m. opening will increase the comfort and convenience of residents in the area that shop at Fry's. There should be no negative or adverse impact resulting from a few people sitting outside the Deli/ Bakery area enjoying the atmosphere and relaxing while having coffee, bagels, pastries or a sandwich. The outdoor seating area will add a personal/ pedestrian element to the project. 5 �,t .)LC_-) — U 5 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS J U N 1 8 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPI�1E''-' DEPARTMENT Page: 2 Opening the store for customer service at 5:00 a.m. should not have a negative impact on individuals living or working in the area. The number of customers using the store between 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. is relatively small and consequently the traffic in and out of the site will be minimal. Between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. individuals coming to the site will not be creating significant noise or light intrusion into the residential areas in the vicinity of the Fry's store. The convenience of customers wanting to shop early in the morning or to pick up items before normal working hours should not be a problem or inconvenience to Property Owners in the area. The general welfare of the Town is not compromised or damaged in any way by allowing a small outdoor seating area and an opportunity for customers to begin shopping at 5:00 a.m. The store is not located immediately adjacent to any residential properties and consequently the potential for inconsistent or incompatible impacts are not present with this Special Use Permit request. M M "a' ■ I-- V W O CL LlJ O Q T- mZ(n rw doom NC� L6 v H m LtJ -1 Q0 u C�Q CL w f1 zCf) �( f.1 F- 0— ' m co J CJ z W O Cr (n U I- v Z Q w co Q w Q. Description: Maricopa,AZ Assessor Map 217.30 Page: 20 of 32 Order., 9 Comment: TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS J U N 18 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11MARICOPA COUNTY (0 In m £ N O � O tf.L �� rw�u•n•+ i •.aq a r i' y DI S6f"" Y-. ! wtRtyN01 Nf- MN ►Ml8 .0 g "' K 'O f #: . ..SI ( tl m a 3> !o im i „, N w m r m .. z ` I _ m m \ 't N z 1 N A m m 't � \ x m u 't i m L_.._.._.. I I I i N O OD M ASSESSOR'S OFFICE THE IMIII COPA COUNTY ASSES30W 3 OFFICE WINS NO CLAIM BILlITT'fA� NOF�I THEUSE OF TIE INFONMTION NEIIEON. m D a� r mm � s 3 r p n C frl Z 0 � N O D i . C •� A' roar .t ; .t '�.;r •, I T —� D� r_d:aSiYGFb.i i t ` ! ••AY1}fifi �D..t,P�IL"_••• 1 O O I to i-r D i .aL•�+iji i r • '1 m ti m m i D r i i "� ro ! ! O ��� N C ism (..,� mW Rl . 70 i �, _ r 1"?f '�rIF 77iY.M.'L `dT•,P.- 1 I I !zee } 'J Im V 'D (�OD D , zea ! _ �' I W Co 'I v-. � W D N �\ N -I .•tF$�t�m z �F ; ��. ; 1 � � 1 m r � � go Co 1 0,0 �. '�• m ,dt� D %1 a ! _ �•.� ,. z z o f .0 Z yzmj "• b Cb 1-m '.t /•,/'•l d•�` �.N� Q - i T W T v N m/ N m IJ a 2 �.•�•'a�I�'•• • 1 I Ui m I I ... m! ./•• 1 CD NL]t _-- j ,i �• I y Sr10..1 NPrS aff z —� Z Qi --.i m 1n �E n 0 pn Description: Maricopa,AZ Assessor Map 217.30 Page 3 of 32 Only Order. 9 Comment: `er'�I I 'ya^ f?2Fisa'Fi j TZS 'C 'li y�2�3� T NtlT�X3 ��ape F �E ems �� _►?� y�gb �, fig � �C%iYS X_. yqyC` ililildil R m 0 Z0-EI-90 1IV4113d 3sn IYOUS 801 a31lro'MS SV z < < 'S31V]:)OSSV (3731-d''O *m -1 CM/OV" V3� AVMMNd WLNrw 3 -ZV "T*' W z < LLJ IN3WdOI3A3G all 13SOd011d ce aIt < of z o CL Ply .6 0 rillb r D >si as uj a Rr R h� 1v .1 z OC 7.1 7.2 (8.)0 I I I i 1 yvrlpp.�7 [noL-lH��, 35 H Q�J 3'-9" +10� t.o. wall FRY 9S FOOD &DRUG FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA Project No: 991300 Date: 09 JUL 02 Sheet No: Drawn: M•L ^ I /_ I Checked: K.D.R. J KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC. 74DO EAST McDONALD DRIVE. • SUITE 101 • SCOTTSDALE, AZ. 85250 Phone:(480) 941-1440 Fax:(480) 948-1055 www.kdro.com +12�5'-0" t.o. parapet$ +113-4" t.o. eave +112-0" t.o. eave-F _ +110�' -10 b.o. beamY +110'-0" 141 t.o. column t.o. arch +100'-0" fin. floor TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS J U L 1 0 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN'i 7.1 7.2 8.0 I I +125'-0-0"� t.o. parapetY ------------------------ LAG' ERE o DD ELO _ +11�3-4�" t.o. eaveY +112-0-0" t.o. eaveY _ +110" �-10 b.o. beamY +110'-0" t.o. column t.o. arch +100'-0" fin. floor t IUJ —4 t.0. WOII TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILL J U L 1 0 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN' DEPARTMENT FRY 9S FOOD & DRUG FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA Project No: 991300 Date: 09 JUL 02 Sheet No: Drawn: M.L. ^ /_ �+ Checked: K.D.R. J KURT D. REED ASSOCIATES, INC. 7400 EAST McDONALD DRIVE. • SUITE 101 • SCOTTSDALE, Al 85250 Phone:(480) 941-1440 Fax:(480) 948-1055 www.kdra.com �1 J Ill 111. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Town Council FROM: Jesse Drake, Interim Director of Community Development Jb DATE: August 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Consideration of the Special Use Permit for "VoiceStream Wireless". This request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow a Wireless Communication Facility for VoiceStream Wireless consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug mounted antennas at the Fountain Hills High School, 16100s East Shea Boulevard. Please refer to the attached Staff report for additional details regarding this request. 11 A TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND STAFF REPORT August 15, 2002 CASE NO: SU2002-01 LOCATION: 16100 East Palisades Boulevard, aka Final Plat Fountain Hills High School. REQUEST: Consideration of a Special Use Permit to allow a wireless communication facility for "VoiceStream Wireless " consisting of an equipment structure and a replacement light pole with snug mounted antennas. PROJECT MANAGER: Jesse Drake, Interim Director of Community Development DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: Morris Mickelson/VoicesStream Wireless OWNER: Fountain Hills Unified School District EXISTING ZONING: "R1-43" EXISTING CONDITION: Fountain Hills High School SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: NORTH: Golden Eagle Park, zoned "R1-43" SOUTH: Single-family residential, zoned "R1-10" *_4W EAST: Fountain Hills High School, zoned "R-3" WEST: Single-family residential, zoned "R1-6A" SUMMARY: This request is for approval of a Special Use Permit to allow VoiceStream Wireless to construct a wireless communication facility consisting of a 20'W x 15'D x 10'H equipment shelter and a replacement light pole with attached snug -mounted antennas. VoiceStream Wireless proposes to construct a new equipment shelter behind the south end of the existing stadium bleachers, and provide an underground cable connection to a new light pole that will replace an existing pole. The equipment shelter will be constructed of concrete masonry blocks painted to the Fountain Hills High School specifications and will have a chain link roof covering the entire shelter. Access to the equipment shelter will be through a five-foot wide wrought iron gate containing view concealing wooden slats. A twenty -inch diameter ball field light pole is proposed to replace the existing sixteen -inch diameter pole at the south end of the bleachers. The new pole will be installed at the same height as the existing pole and will completely conceal the internal cabling to twelve new snug -mounted antennas. The existing lights will be removed and reinstalled on the new pole. The applicant is proposing to install two sets of six antennas, one set at a centerline height of 68 feet, one set at a centerline height of 75 feet. All antennas will be snug - mounted against the pole to improve their appearance. Access to the site is proposed on an existing service road that intersects with Golden Eagle Boulevard, just south of the Golden Eagle Park south parking lot. Although additional antennas could be mounted to the exterior of the pole, the capacity for co -location is limited due to of the diameter of the pole and the requirements of the internal cabling. AT&T Wireless has an existing wireless facility in approximately the same location. The AT&T shelter is behind the stadium bleachers on the north end, and the AT&T antennas are mounted on the adjacent northernmost light pole behind the stadium bleachers. The Fountain Hills Unified School District is in support of this application, and no complaints have been received during the required notice period. EVALUATION: The proposed wireless communication facility complies with general guidelines established in the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance regulations for Wireless Communications Towers and Antennas as stated in Chapter 17, Sectionl7.01. The proposed facility uses existing verticality, will minimize the total number of towers in the community, and is not visually intrusive. The proposal does not meet the ordinance requirement of a minimum 2000-foot separation between towers, however staff is recommending that the Council waive this requirement due to the limited existing verticality in the area. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this application on August 8, 2002, and staff recommends approval of SU 2002-01, "VoiceStream Wireless". IR M TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Date Fled I Fee Pal ( c> C' $$ U U JAccepted By Type of SpeclaNse Requested Wireless Communication Facility co -located on a High School Lightpole Address of Subject Property Zoning 16100 E. Palisades Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 R-3 Legal Description: Plat Block Lot(s) APN: 176-17-300J See attached description on drawings Applicant Day Phone Morris M.ickelson / VoiceStream Wireless 602 410-2210 Address 2601 W. Broadway Rd. City Tempe ST AZ I Zip 85282 Owner Day Phone Ft. Hills Unified School Dist. C/o VoiceStream Wireless 602 410-2210 Addres 1460 l N. Del Cambre city Hills ST AZ 85268 Signature of Owner 1-HERBY AUTHORIZE (Please Print) Date Morris Mickelson / VoiceStream Wireless See Attached Authorization 01-09-2002 TO FILE THIS APPUCATION. Subscribed and swam before me this day of 19 My Commission Expires Notary Public (Seal) Submittal Requirements (attach additional sheets): 1. Mailing labels (2 sets) with names and addresses of all property owners within 300 feet of the external boundaries of the subject property and a map showing the 300 foot radius from which the names and addresses were derived. 2. 15 full size folded prints (preferably 24"X36") of the site plan showing minimum zoning requirements and the proposed development if the Special Use Permit is granted, as well as the exterior elevations. 3. 1 8.5" X 11" photostatic reduction of each of the above referenced exhibits. 4. Describe the proposed use, the operations of the use, and the facilities proposed for the land use. 5. A narrative describing any adverse impact the proposed land use may have on the surrounding properties and on the neighborhood and what steps will be taken to avoid these adverse impacts. Fee Schedule Attached TFH Case Number _ � 1 � ti t �CC*-- N I f 1 p oWti NOR fit � g N —<— _ =MIT% I A"! g j S00 p •GZ� l�a.S9'psE M.S6,81lIS _> \ \ / / �'� l pp: . J o ggj h� 3m .4ZS9y\•. G L3 N 1y aro \ • j � c 9 i� CD1 liila! Eli < Q z U I I $ C,m l H a O = a� t a 18 1 1 rp a-311if a.o9\/" \\ zi 0' Spa �� ��F g'�• b o 4 V g O v Ell 0. qg� Z -a z 0 U W Z Z U: SO i N N it Ln S I I L.. tl .: A a � �a7 � a g g- a' F q S =� z � rzW V ,00 k �I- M N [ � 1 1 t In ;o �2 2 7< I r � =off f = 59 I .. fit$ ti C p r � _ Y I I I � 5 I I r - & f E I r / 0 ° r 1 & H z� 1 0 .001 .9L .09 a .o� O O O 00 O . 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council FROM: Julie A. Ghetti, CPA, Accounting Supervisor THROUGH: Sintra Hoffman, Interim Town Manager 11 RE: Ordinance No. 02-12 Tax Levy DATE: August 9, 2002 During the 2002-2003 budget process, the Council approved the Debt Retirement portion of the budget in the amount of $2,226,750. This amount allows for the payment of principal and interest on all outstanding Town bond issues. Of that amount, $1,390,000 was allocated for payment of the voter -approved General Obligation Bonds for the street paving project, the Lakeside open space, Library/Museum and the McDowell Mountain open space preservation bonds. The approval of Ordinance 02-12 is the final step in the budget process and authorizes the Maricopa County Finance Department to levy the appropriate property tax necessary to make the debt service payment for fiscal year 2002-2003. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 02-12. Note: Based on the final assessed property valuation of $270,602,866 the approximate tax rate per $100 of assessed value will be $0.5136 or $51.36 annually for a home with a secondary assessed value of $100,000. R ORDINANCE NO.02-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, SUBJECT TO TAXATION A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR BOND REDEMPTIONS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED INDEBTEDNESS; ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2003. WHEREAS, by the provisions of State law, an ordinance is required to set the property tax levy for fiscal year 2002-2003; WHEREAS, the County of Maricopa is assessing and collecting authority for the Town of Fountain Hills, the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the County Assessor and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Maricopa, Arizona; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. There is hereby levied on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of all property, both real and personal, within the corporate limits of the Town of Fountain Hills, except such property as may be by law exempt from taxation, a secondary property tax rate sufficient to raise the sum of $1,390,000 for the purpose of providing a bond interest and redemption fund for General Obligation Bond debt service for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003. SECTION 2. Failure by the county officials of Maricopa County, Arizona, to properly return the delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in the same, or any irregularity in any proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or invalidate any title conveyed by any tax deed; failure or neglect of any officer or officers to timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them shall not invalidate any proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto, the validity of the assessment or levy of taxes or of the judgement of sale by which the collection of the same may be enforced shall not affect the lien of the Town of Fountain Hills upon such property for the delinquent taxes unpaid thereon, and no overcharge as to part of the taxes or of costs shall invalidate any proceedings for the collection of taxes or the foreclosure; and all acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure. SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 15th day of August, 2002. ATT ST: Cassie Hansen, Director of Administration/Town Clerk REVWWED BY antra Hoffman, Acting o anager William E. Farrell, Town Attorney ORDINANCE NO.02-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, SUBJECT TO TAXATION A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE REQUIRED IN THE ANNUAL BUDGET, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR BOND REDEMPTIONS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING INTEREST UPON BONDED INDEBTEDNESS; ALL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2003. WHEREAS, by the provisions of State law, an ordinance is -required to set the property tax levy for fiscal year 2002-2003; WHEREAS, the County of Maricopa is assessing and collecting authority for the Town of Fountain Hills, the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the County Assessor and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Maricopa, Arizona; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION E There is hereby levied on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of all property, both real and _personal, within the corporate limits of the Town of Fountain Hills, except such property as may be by law exempt from taxation, a secondary property tax rate sufficient to raise the sum of $1,390,000 for the purpose of providing a bond interest and redemption fund for General Obligation Bond debt service for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003. SECTION 2. Failure by the county officials of Maricopa County, Arizona, to properly return the delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in -the same, or any irregularity in any proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or invalidate any title conveyed by any tax deed; failure or neglect of any officer or officers to timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them shall not invalidate any proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto, the validity of the assessment or levy of taxes or of the judgement of sale by which the collection of the same may be enforced shall not affect the lien of the Town of Fountain Hills upon such property for the delinquent taxes unpaid thereon, and no overcharge as to part of the taxes or of costs shall invalidate any proceedings for the collection of taxes or the foreclosure; and all acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure. SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 15th day of August, 2002. ATT ST: Cassie Hansen, Director of Administration/Town Clerk REVIEWED BY S' tra Hoffman, Actin Town Manager William E. Farrell, Town Attorney 0 w11 N o � � a ftT. ivo • that is An"" DATE: TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: TOWN of FOUNTAIN HILLS Community Development Department MEMORANDUM August 9, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and Town Council Sintra Hoffman, Acting Town Manager Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner Case # CFW2002-02; Fill waiver request for 15117 E. Camelview Drive, a proposed single-family residence. This is a fill waiver request for approximately 1.9 feet above the ten feet allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. At the August 8, 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of this fill waiver request. Please refer to the Staff Report for additional details regarding this request. The applicant is aware that this agenda item may be moved to the September 5, 2002 Town Council Meeting in an effort to maintain a timely Town Council Meeting on August 15, 2002. 16836 East Palisades Boulevard, Building C — P.O. Box 17958 — Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 — (480) 837-2003 — FAX: (480) 837-1404 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT August 8, 2002 CASE NO: CFW2002-01 PROJECT MANAGER: Dana Burkhardt, Senior Planner REQUEST: Consideration of a fill waiver for a single family residence to permit a retained fill approximately 1.96 feet in excess of the ten foot maximum allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is located on Lot 33 of Eagle Mountain Parcel 13; aka 15117 E. Camelview Drive. DESCRIPTION: OWNER: APPLICANT: EXISTING ZONING: EXISTING CONDITION: LOT SIZE: Mike and Carol Silverberg Mike and Carol Silverberg "R 1- l0A" Undeveloped Lot 16,770.65 square feet SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: NORTH: Undeveloped residential lot, zoned "R1-10A" SOUTH: Undeveloped Salt River Pima Indian Community Property EAST: Undeveloped residential lot, zoned "R1-10A" WEST: Undeveloped residential lot, zoned "R1-l0A" SUMMARY: This is a request by Mike Silverberg for a 1.96 foot retained fill in excess of the ten (10) foot maximum allowed by Section 5.11 (C)(4) of the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance. The portion of the proposed fill in excess of ten feet is located under a portion of the rear patio and master bedroom, at the southeast corner of the proposed building. The total area of fill in excess of ten (10) feet is approximately 330 square feet in area, and approximately 13 cubic yards of fill. EVALUATION: Through the preliminary and final plat review process, the Eagle Mountain Parcel 13 subdivision lot design was found to be developable without the need of a variance, waiver, or any further discretionary approvals from the Town. Staff believes there are design options that can mitigate the need for a fill waiver from Town Council. The applicant could avoid the cut and fill waiver request by lowering the finished floor elevations of the home, which would not require the driveway slope to be increased. This option entails moving the two -car garage portion of the home approximately five feet to the east of the floor plan, aligning the front of the garage with the access from garage to the laundry room. With this realignment, the entire home may be shifted five feet to the west, up hill, to set on the seven -foot P & Z Commission and Staff Report CFW02-02 August 15, 2002 Page 2 sideyard setback line, which would reduce the maximum fill by one foot. By lowering the living room finish floor elevation by six inches (one additional step riser), and by lowering the patio finish floor by an additional six inches, the need for a fill waiver would be avoided. A combination of these suggestions, among other options, would be relatively unnoticeable to the property owner, and lower the overall building and wall heights without the need for a waiver. The primary difference between the alternative option presented by Staff in the evaluation and the proposed design would be noticeable from the rear of the property, where the two (2) six foot terraced retaining walls would be reduced by two feet. RECONEVIENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Town Council approval of CFW2002-02 with a 5-0 vote. E* PBA 1 /02 The Town of Fountain Hills COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I For Ue Case Mla alger: Only Fountain Hills, Arizona APPLICATION ._ Area Specific Plan or Change Preliminary Plat General Plan Amendment Cut/Fill Waiver Plan of Development Special Use Permit Zoning Change SU Comprehensive Sign Plan Variance HPE Change or Abandonment NATURE OF THE REQUEST: PROJECT NAME Mrs. Applicant:`` ,� �''""- ''� V ���"�� Day Phone Mr. _ Ms. Address: `�''S C. �E\,M�ct.a� v,c.� City: ESN �,�`� State: P-kZip: Mrs. Owner: Mr. Ms. Address: City: Day Phone State: Zip: If application is being submitted by someone other than the owner of the property under consideration, the section below mit be completed, SIGNATURE OF OWNER I HEREBY AUTHORIZE Please Print Subscribed and sworn before me this day of FILING DATE: Application Page 2 of 7 DATE TO FILE THIS APPLICATION. 20 My Commission Expires Notary Public hl 1 £) J FEE PAID: (See Fee Schedule) I you ACCEPTED BY: Case Number ool July, 2002 Cut and Fill Waiver Request: Subject Property: Proposed Residence for Mike and Carol Silverberg within the Eagle Mountain Community, at 15117 E. Camelback View, Lot 33, within Parcel 13. Brief Narrative below describes and offers the reason for the request: Description of the Property: As shown on an accompanying attached photo, Lot 33 fronts Camelback View (north), has adjacent lots on both sides (east and west), and faces the Salt River Pima Community territory at its rear (south). Camelback View is not a hillside street, but the street does slope along its length. As seen on the photo (or in the parcel 13 plan itself), Lot 33 is already the lowest lot on the street. At the street, Lot 33 progresses from a low point of 1600 feet above sea level at its front left corner, to 1609 feet at its front right corner. The lot is 16,700 sq ft.( 110 feet along the street, 150 feet +/- deep). Planned Home and Waiver Request Description: As a current resident of Eagle Mountain at 14739 E. Shimmering View for four years, we have been and continue to be committed to retaining the value and look of the community. This property at Camelback f View offers us an opportunity to build a modest "great room, single story" residence, much like our current house on Shimmering View, but one that can better accommodate our family needs (3143 sq ft vs. our existing 1875 sq ft). (Please see attached Camelback house and plot plan). The single story plan is important to us, hence the selection of a lot that offered that opportunity. We researched construction rules as best we could prior to purchase, hired Montgomery Engineering in Fountain Hills to try to position and set the resulting design consistent with all construction requirements, and wound up with a plan that is compliant in all regards, except that the "rear left corner" of the master bedroom will require 1 to 2 feet of fill beyond the 10 ft requirement, covering approximately 3% or 100 sq ft of the 3143 sq ft planned home. Please refer to the cross- hatched section provided. Steps already taken to avoid the need for the Waiver: With the help of Montgomery Engineering,: a) we've positioned the house favoring the high side of the lot - the right side - to the extent permitted (7 ft from the property line) b) we've lowered the home equal to the low point on the street, approximately 9 ft lower than the right corner of the property. This places the home approximately a full story in elevation below the house on lot 34, which is in turn approximately a full story below the house on lot 35. At this proposed elevation, a front, right side retaining wall at the street had to be introduced. That wall (see site plan) is already at the 6 foot level at its corner (maximum allowed at Eagle Mountain), - lowering the home any further would require a second wall, setting the house further back and essentially defeating its purpose. Also, at this elevation, the driveway already has 8.5 to 10% local grades to satisfy the drainage plan; and again, any further lowering would create greater unwanted entry grade changes. [In my opinion, a view of the street as currently proposed creates a pleasant terracing effect between all the homes on that side of the street; whereas any further lowering of the lowest home (mine) would simply make it look like its in a severe recess. We started out with the house at the midpoint of the street elevation span (1604.5 feet), and would up four feet lower to try to avoid the need for a waiver.] c) we've cut an original 3450 sq ft house down to 3143, in order to shorten it's depth, and move it as close to the street as practical, and therefore minimize construction at the lower left rear side of the lot. d) we've extended the exterior stucco finish on the left rear of the home to just above grade, to cover any unappealing foundation. e) we've introduced steps in the interior of the home and decking a total of four times from front to back, in order to stay consistent with the slight slope of the property. Any additional steps would be inconsistent with the single story concept we wanted at the onset, and need at our age. [As an aside, one reason we relocated from the East was to eliminate the daily steps associated with our two story colonial.] f) we've kept the height of the home, the pitch of the roof (4/12), and the height of the roof lines well within the guidelines of the Eagle Mountain homeowners association; and we've obtained homeowners approval of the design before approaching the town of Fountain Hills. With all of the above, we still find that approximately a 10 ft by 10 ft section of the left rear corner of the house, and an equal sq. footage on the covered deck just outside that bedroom, will require zero to two feet of fill beyond the 10 ft limit, "from original grade". I'm hopeful that given the setting of the lot on the street, its relationship to its higher neighbors, and the steps and sensitivity we've taken to minimize the issue, will all collectively yield a positive consideration of this request for the cut and fill waiver. Respectfully, Mike and Carol Silverberg 14739 E. Shimmering View Fountain Hills, AZ, 85268 480-816-6798 L 2uez ua zU oz„b:lBq, KEi RAC m *#mw 99 C'. ® �_ _- $2§ — -- ®— - ' a & k— --------- b_� G � --- 2k k _ _ e � c -- §§ L � %k 2 ■� ° n � \� ® --- siE ■■ .9 . � f.5 t I a ' 41 r 'A T7':i FVnT7qPP70 PC !9T 7nn'71?qT/±P m z9 739vd I 3\1 FVnT7qPP7q FP'qT 7r)n7 Or) T 1) n EANew Work as of 7-1-02\Betty\EAA 02- ; SRC Tract A.docPage 1 of 1 Chron 162 Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS Public Works Department Engineering Division MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town "uncil FROM: Randy Harrel DATE: August 8, 2002 RE: Notification of Acceptance Grant of Access Easement EAA 2002-07 Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Parcel D-North The SunRidge Canyon Community Association has granted an access easement in a portion of Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Final Plat D-North, located at the northwest edge of the Wildcat Court cul-de-sac bulb, adjacent to the SRP site. The existing dirt road access to the North Heights Dam crest is actually located in this area, instead of in the adjacent, legally platted 20' access easement (which is currently vegetated). If and when SRP actually builds their proposed electrical substation in the adjacent "SRP site", we will need to work out with SRP which easement/area the Town's dam access should be routed through. In accordance with our normal procedure, no Council action is required for a grant of an easement. This memo is merely for your information. B att. cc: Tom Ward Jim Leubner SunRidge Canyon Community Association (c/o Capital Consultants) Quinn Johnson/Suncor John Rezek/North Heights POA N E:Wew Work as of 7-1-02\Betty\SRC Grant of Easement --Tract A (NH Dam).doc When Recorded Return To: Town Engineer Town of Fountain Hills P.O. Box 17958 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269 GRANT OF EASEMENT The SunRidge Canyon Community Association, grantor, for good and valuable consideration, hereby grants to the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, grantee, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns a perpetual easement for the following purposes, namely:, An access easement on, over, under and across the ground embraced as described below and as depicted in Exhibit "A", situated in the Town of Fountain Hills, State of Arizona. That portion of Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Final Plat D-North, as recorded in Book 434, Page 50 MCR, and shown as being an SRP access easement; said portion being bounded by Lot 26; the Wildcat Court right-of-way; and the platted 20' access easement all within said SunRidge Canyon Parcel D-North; and also bounded by Parcel 2, and the SRP site of the SunRidge Canyon plat, as recorded in Book 406, Page 23, MCR. Grantor covenants that grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of this aforementioned tract or parcel of land; that grantor has good and lawful right to sell and convey it; and that grantor will warrant the title and quiet possession thereto against the claim of any person whatsoever. Dated this LL day of By: JL STATE OF ARIZONA ) County of Maricopa ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of 2002, by Vic_ M _1t.>A :51 rn She_ Notary Public My Commission Expire � IAL SEAL" R T "OFFICIAL SEAL" L. Hadder Andrea L. Hadder tic Arizona Notary Public -Arizona v Maricopa County County M Commission Ex ires 11/30 2002 { !res 11�30 2002 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUNRIDGE CANYON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION REGARDING GRANT OF EASEMENT WHEREAS, Article III of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the SunRidge Canyon Community Association (hereafter "the Association") designates the Association as the controlling entity for the Common Areas, and WHEREAS, Article II, Paragraph 6 of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Association specifically authorize the Association, acting through its Board of Directors, to grant easements over the Common Area for the installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities without the approval of the membership, and WHEREAS, the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona has requested a perpetual easement to allow maintenance access to the North Heights Dam, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by a majority of the Board of Directors of the SunRidge Canyon Community Association, to grant to the Town of Fountain Hills such easement on, over, under, and across ground described as follows and depicted in Exhibit A: • That portion of Tract A of SunRidge Canyon Final Plat D-North, as recorded in Book 434, Page 50 MCR, and shown as being an SRP access easement; said portion being bounded by Lot 26; the Wildcat Court right- of-way; and the platted 20' access easement all within said Parcel; and also bounded by Parcel 2, and the SRP site of the SunRidge Canyon plat, as recorded in Book 406, Page 23, MCR. RESOLVED this 25th day of July 2001, by the Board of Directors of the SunRidge Canyo Signed Jack McNutt, President On the 25th day of July 2002, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the County of Maricopa in the State of Arizona, personally appeared Jack McNutt, who acknowledged that he is the president of the Association and, being authorized to do so, subscribed and swore to the statements contained in this notice. 2L, Notary Public Tom, "OFFICIAL SEAL" Andrea L. HaddeJ2002 Nola ry Public -Arizona ,ice aricopa County rt� emr ssio; Ex Tres 1130 My Commission Expires: 0-- _ ,.�; TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ACCESS EASEMENT ACQUISITION EXHIBIT "A" SUNRIDGE CANYON PLAT "D-NORTH", TRACT "A" PLAT D-NORTH BOOK 434 / PAGE 50 SRP SITE (EXCEPTION TO FINAL PLAT OF SUNRIDGE CANYON LAND MCR BOOK 406, PAGE 23) Rf- S ,\f ICArF Goa / / , / TRACT 'A' 16545 o RANDY L. j0 HARREL 10' ELECTRIC $f°Si9,,,d ' \EASEMENT OCKET 16222\SU IDGE C YON PG 328 MCR -� / \ R CEL "D-NOMC OOK 434, PAG 0 EXISTING NEW OWN OF FOUNTAIN SRP ACCESS HILLS ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT 0.052 Acres 7 � Sb-NRIDGE CANYON so�8i ?.Cb PARCEL„2„ y �\ MCR BOOK 406, PAGE 23 N, ���. �� 25 EXISTING ®TowN p�� cEss ACCESS (oSE]AENT ACQUISITION EASEMENT \ 90 \ (C)/— COMPUTED DISTANCE AS EXISTING MEASURED PER PLAT D—NORTH, 1' VNAE \ MCR BOOK 434, PAGE 50. � EXISTING \ \ 8' PUE — \ TRACT 'A' SCALE: 1 "=40' TE: 6-18-02 27 \ \ 28 . k►. Chron 161 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Town ncil FROM: Randy Harrel, Town Engineer + ," THROUGH: Tom Ward, Director of Public Wor�B'I1 DATE: August 8„ 2002 RE: Grant of Easement (EAA2002-02) 16646 Laser Drive Plat 412A, Block 5, Lot 14 0.01 Acres (451 square feet total) Technology Drive and Laser Drive R.E. Monks Construction Company, LLC This proposed Grant of Easement Dedication by R. E. Monks Construction Company LLC, to the Town of Fountain Hills resulted from review and modifications to the Technology Drive road design. The existing right-of-way at the northwest corner of Laser Drive and Technology Drive was partially utilized to construct a 60-foot radius at the new street curb return. This road design change allows the long wheel -based heavy equipment vehicles to make a safe southbound to westbound turn onto Laser Drive from Technology Drive, The use of the existing right-of-way at this corner creates the need for this easement, which grants the Town permission to use this area (Exhibit B) for the purposes indicated. The Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the Civil Improvement Plans related to this project, which include the new curb return at the northwest corner of Laser Drive and Technology Drive. The Engineering Department approves this Grant of Easement. In accordance with our previous practice, no Council action is required for a grant of an easement. This memo is merely for your information. lib cc: R.E. Monks Construction Company, LLC Attachments GAEasement Memo\EAA02-02 R.E. Monks - Grant of Easement Staff Memo.doc When Recorded Return To: Town Engineer �.. Town of Fountain Hills P.O. Box 17958 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269 GRANT OF EASEMENT R.E. Monks grantor, for good and valuable consideration, hereby grants to the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, grantee, a municipal corporation, its successors and assigns, and to public utilities, a perpetual easement for the following purposes, only: Maintenance and repair of curb and gutter, signage, and overflow street drainage. on, over, under and across the ground embraced within the aforementioned plat as described in Exhibit "A" and as depicted in Exhibit "B", situated in the Town of Fountain Hills, State of Arizona. Grantor covenants that grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of this aforementioned tract or parcel of land; that grantor has good and lawful right to sell and convey it; and that grantor will warrant the title and quiet possession thereto against the claim of any person whatsoever. Dated this 61 day of 2002. By: STATE OF ARIZONA ) County of Maricopa ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BE before me this day of 200211by wiga OFFICIAL SEAL d / "� MARIBETH KLASEN Notary Public Notary Public - Swo o1 Anon My %R&=t s 23 ' 1' D 5 Subject: DEDICATION EXHIBIT Job No.: 81561097 PLAT 412—A w BLOCK 5 o LOT 14 0 w 1" = 40' PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL, SIGNAGE, 0 DRAINAGE AND REPAIR C� o O o —I o O o N POINT OF POINT OF R��opo U COMMENCEMENT BEGINNING o w _ N 90'00'00" E 110.00' — 2 LASER DRIVE 8211 SOUTH 48TH STREET PHOENIX. AZ 85044-5355 PH: (602] 438-2200 FAX: (602] 431-9562 - ENGINEERING . PLANNING . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . WATER RESOURCES . . SURVEYING . TRANSPORTATION . Q:\81561097\FIELDSUR\DWG\DED EXHIBfT.DWG Prepared BY: MJP Date 5/21 /01 Checked By: JAE Sheet No: 1 of 1 zoo [A ONI'9KILI[1SN00 DRIKV.LS 6096 T£b Z09 XV,4 OZ:ZT 211L ZO/TZ/40 Am LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED A PORTION OF LOT 14, BLOCK 5 OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ARIZONA FINAL PLATNO. 412-A AS RECORDED IN BOOK 158, AT PAGE 20 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14; THENCE NORTH 90000'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 14, A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF CURVATURE FOR A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 62.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00000'00" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 14, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE FOR A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90000'00", AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90000'00" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 14, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 258 SQUARE FEET OR 0.01 ACRES MORE OR LESS. I -A N D S!/ \\F�CATF� C9 �� U c O V 33321 O w MICI-iAEL J. :17 oPS PUMMERf/21/ �1 Q:\81561097\FIELDSUR\DOCS\LOT 14 ROW DED-LEGAL.DOC £00o �NI'9NILII1SN00 DFUNKIS 6096 T£b Z09 XVJ OZ:ZT Hf1J. ZO/TZ/SO MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR BEYDLER AND TOWN TOWN COUNCILMEMBERS �'" n ��6/✓ FROM: SUSAN STEIN, ASSISTANT C DATE: AUGUST 9, 2002 RE: WEEKLY ACTIVITY REPORT An e session will be held August 12, Monday evening, at 5:00 p.m. followed by a public meeting regarding Sierra Madre at 6:30 p.m. PLEASE NOTE: Dana's report, located in your council packet, contains relevant information for Monday's meeting and for Thursday's Council meeting. It appears that the retreat dates of October 4 and 5 will work for everyone. Unless we hear otherwise, these dates will be firmed up at the beginning of next week. George Cappannelli has been selected as facilitator, and he has agreed to provide his services pro bono. Should any of you like to view a videotape of Mr. Cappannelli's company, please see me. Tim Pickering has signed the employment agreement and the escrow agreement. His start date is September 16th. He plans to come to Fountain Hills once before his start date to house hunt. He and Stacey will be here from August 21-28 for that purpose. Tim plans to attend the League Conference during that time. The afternoon and early evening of Tuesday, September loth has been designated for the finalist candidate interviews for attorney services with councilmembers, and panel attorneys. Please mark your calendars. This meeting is anticipated to run for 5 hours (45 minutes for each interview and 15 minute break). I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that meeting rooms at Town Hall must be scheduled through the Town's scheduler to avoid conflicts and confusion. Should you wish to schedule a meeting in one of the meeting rooms, please designate the date/time/place of the meeting room and request to be included on the scheduler. R f Town staff held a public meeting on Wednesday with the Trevino Drive residents to listen to their concerns. This report was emailed to you under separate cover. Parks and Rec met with town veteran groups regarding the Veteran's Memorial. An estimate will be available within a few weeks. Planning for Sept. 11 memorial ceremonies have begun, and the groundbreaking for the Memorial has been planned for this date. Repairs to the aerators at Fountain Lake should be finalized next week, which will improve the current odor level that occurs seasonally. Several areas, including behind Plaza Fountainside, have been hydroseeded to promote turf growth. Tom Ward, Don Clark and Mark Mayer met with Ron Huber, Superintendent of the Sanitation District, regarding his desire to upgrade his current permit to distribute effluent water to various users. Currently effluent water is used at all of our parks except Four Peaks. Under the rules for the new permitting, each effluent user is required to submit their own permit to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality — Water Permits Section. Under the permit, signage must be erected that informs the public that the water being utilized on the site is effluent. Each of the parks that utilize effluent water has the appropriate signage. Mountain plat review is ongoing. Meetings are held bi-monthly with MCO to prioritize the parcels and keep up with their time schedule. The first submittal for Town center III will be submitted this month. Target is on track to open in October 2002. A press release will be seen in the Times next week regarding the completion of the Shea Blvd. microsurfacing and striping project, close to the Target grand opening. Recommendations from the Community Center Advisory Commission will be presented at the September 5th council meeting. Jim has revised his monthly usage report to more accurately reflect revenues and usage. Only 4 Saturdays out of the next 48 are still open, and more than 50% of those booked are for wedding receptions! Todd and Mary Schlosser met with the high school officials and reviewed security plans and responsibilities of the resource officers. There are 12 new video cameras installed to monitor 24-hour activity. Rural Metro's July report can be summed up as follows: Total calls 293, cancelled prior to arrival 18, emergency calls, 120, non -emergency 155. Average rsponse emergency calls, 00:03:18, Average response EMS calls only 00:03:14. Fire loss potential 0, actual fire loss, 0. Fire prevention activities, inspections 84, plan reviews 50, consultation/meetings 33, public education, 12 hours. Should you like a copy of the full report, please advise. O,��pIiN 91�t c � fsr. wag T 9��rbat iS �,tioo DATE: Town of FOUNTAIN HILLS Community Center MEMORANDUM August 9, 2002 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Town Council THROUGH: Sintra Hoffma i wn Manager FROM: James B. ill ommunity Center Director SUBJECT: Revised Monthly Activity Report The new version of this report separates the monthly activities by user categories rather than just a simple chronological listing of activities. The categories are the .. four different user groups we now have: Parks and Recreation; Non- Resident/Commercial; Resident/Non-Profit — Paid; Resident/ Non -Profit — No Payment. The purpose being to quantify the uses by each group and to see what percentage each contributes as it relates to usage, attendance and revenues. We have just completed this revision process for this new report and wanted you to see and review it. I think you'll find some interesting statistics such as of our usage, at least for July, is free, no revenues being generated. By next month, we want the report to allocate expenses as they relate to each different user group thereby giving us a much clearer picture of associated costs. I believe this will help to answer the questions and concerns of Council Member Melendez. Our Advisory Commission also believes this will be an excellent overview tool once the expense and revenue numbers are combined not only monthly but year to date as well. As I mentioned, we are in the process of refining the new report to make it a complete picture and as soon as it is finished, we will forward the new format to Council for your information and review. 13001 N. La Montana Dr. - Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 - (480) 816-5200 - FAX: (480) 837-4452 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 69V>6%6,3,F»6463E4t»69Vi 69 V9V9V5,Vo V9V9E»F»F»eq,E»E»f»cflv3vq� viiE»Env3E»vavq,E»v9F»t»6» F» O F- 0 O °dr 0 to m 0 o C O69 O LL O O y T) O � M /0 V 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 00 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 O O W O C C O V> O C O 6% O V3 O 63 O 69 O V). O V) O Vf C V! C V! O V9 O V! O 69 C V! O Vi O V) O V) C Vi O V) 0 V! 0 V3 0 Vi 0 V9 0 V! 0 V3 0 V3 0 to 0 63 0 Gq 0 Vj 0 69 0 V3 0 V) 0 V) 0 V! O V) 69 Vi 6F9 613,69 Q uj Q V W 00 N n ao O (D N r ao N ao M O N r Ln r N r CO N M r N M ao n N V r CO N w It r cm r 0 r n CO r 00 N n CO CO r O M c0 r co r n co N v O M O OD M� W C W Z LU Q ¢ N n i' N E N °0 r N oT E 0 N °r N N 'r O 0 N 'r N O N O J __ O F Q r�EEEEr�EEEEE0EENONvvMEEEEv,'tc\- cc O r r 0 O r r r r N ad w m O cn r r ar Q1 dvENNr�v N E o0 v O E � 0 0 0 0 E o o o o o o o 0 E E E E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E E E 0 0 0 E O E O E O Z J O O a? o m 0 w 0 m o m O O w o m 0 N 0 N 0 cn 0 w (A 0 m 0 m o O� o O O O o O O O m (A w rn N= O 0 O 0 =_ O 0 =_ 4 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 N O 6E 0 0 2 O O = m C O 0 m to ld N l0 U1 .5� _ C O 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 m p 0 c0 0_ �0 0 C=_ o 0 t0 __ m 0 N N m m m C_=== O 0 0 0 HIM m m == CO m C 0 m 2 m U U U U U m U U U U U U Y U U m U m m m m U Y U U m m m U m m U¢ m m U m MM y Z O IV W W Wr r r r- r r r r r r r r r r T- r r r r r r .- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Z LL W 0. C) Z C� Ci W Cc G m p LU C.)W N LT C XO O C XO C_ X cm C XO N 0) U_ O U U 2 0) Q G�� 7 co CO O N (m � m o m m [$ N m o� m 7 ._ O m C te 7 a) 0 m Y E c v�� t t d m •— tm �� m m U V O .� °3LrYrY'�Yr (� V U .. 'C V o OLUYrU io U L U o L •- �wYrUm 'C U 0_ L m U Lmm,_m L r m m 0 N r O o� m m U ac�oc� coN r o °c�-2 o r 0 m m � m O r U a�V�coV m ._ t O r L m m U) rn�mV� O L O) O amv'v y •C L U 'ca m v � m._ L U U aro._ C L U a�m 0naomoco 0to¢ci2a0U)¢U¢Ua.mU¢0toHU¢HamU¢E-YDu)YYHYd¢I- 0•mcaaocaco=mm ammmmm0comm OL CO (o 0. cnH co N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N OR N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 W r r M W 00 OD OD M O O M ! M i to � LO R n io n n a)� O O O O O Q o n n n � n i n n n n n n\\\\\\\\\ n n n n n n r n n n n Z, n I n I n N I n N I n N I!! n N n N n N C n N l n N i n N i� n N n N n N i n N i— n N n N n N i n M Q, n ca m y 0 cTo 0 T T coo y w m m at$ d s T Tm N N y T T TCC$ T T m T T T T T -C m m TC fm C C 0 m C O C O C O C O d ' 0 m O C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C,, 0 0 0 0. m O � C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 -m0-0 N o 0 0 O 2 0 0 IL��2m L`L U)2mm m: LL cn��2���F->>�LL cn 222> >O H N O O N A O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 000000000 o n o cn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M IT M � M w � W N � N W 0V v ap W vQ M 4 CO M 00 O tt O E9 O O 6si O 69 In 6 In 6 a0 MIn 6 6 6 6 � (a— 6 4 N Fa- 69 E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 69 6ii 69 — b9 E9 69 69 69 6!9 69 O 6A 69 E9 V9 69 69 Efl Efl 69 69 69 69 69 VE9 0 F- 69 � F• O O QN m m f9 O O O l0 O O O O C LL LL fA to O O O 00 N E9 Or N 2 _N E9 E9 E9 E9 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O O O O O O 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 F Z 0 W 0 CO 0 V 0 M 0 0 00 0 00 0 O W 117 N O lq N 0 00 0 In 0 [t 0 qt 0 CO 0 l° O V lA r O In W O In u O O Efl O E9 0 O IA In O In M H9 W N 00 v U') W E9 69 69 E9 6A 69 69 69 E9 r2 69 r 69 69 69 69 60 6J9 r _ W fA 69 6A 69 r(f? 69 69 (fl 69 69 V! ¢ ¢613 W O O r N N CO N lA M 00 r Ifi Cl) CO M W r 60 O M N r n 09 M n V a r 00 M v r O V O N O M W n N M v M W �t N r W le O � 00 V VZ M Q Q 0 z C z a a E E E E E ° z o o ca °o g cg O O Nr r ¢¢ ¢ ¢ r ca r H a Cl) N E r M r E r r O o M NrNN E E E E M rrN E E E M F a r M r M E m a) E E a) o a) o N y E° N M a) 0 yr E cn y E E M v O E o o m E o 0 `m c`o E o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 E 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 E 0 v OJ c° E c E 0 o E E O o° E 0 c° o E o o °°° E o° E ° J 0 y E 0 E E c° 0 ai vNi N 0 v0i v0i ai � 0 ,E 2 y 0 1 (/) C C 'E u. C° C y O y. as co 0o�0�0�ac0ca��0ca�a� a�ma�mc°�cid000mc°o�ao��oi°o�a mUcnm0cncn0m000Um0UUm (Am6AmUoo0YUUch50C3 Um0Ym F ao H z W z w W r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r U. O U. O J a cm N m N t G a U c c c c c '� a ¢ •LU � '� '� O Oa N 0) C Y Y U. L ` L U L ` (0 °' ca °' L 2 L 2 L ~ O V� N � C > > S-C 0) F- a L L L ° °Q O L L L W co Q� 07 C Q Co y O Co '+C-.. f0 N W Z Quo �c O O-°UUU > WzCO F- d Com N a O =mc p 7 7 c d ma) N m` J > W O a) O a) O O = O oEEE W = i ° 0 `� ` Q ? a E E E a) i io iu C7 U E E E° G a) Y 0 U 0 d 0 :? ca 0 rn �.Y d a>) 0 L a>) 0 UY a) Q 0 L 0 UY m V ~ ° 200072 o 0 0 — 0 0 0—_ C Y O o 000 0 o a Cl)co W cc N a)mm OYL .� c 0)W O .0 U)— n1�m fd CC •� 0 0 CC 0 y ldm= C 0y c0 N c0m c0 ¢ W W O N V) 0) ca Q7 N N i E UYYY N w 0 CC co _ C C °_ C _ N C _ 0 yYYY o (0 (0 f0 O dQQ O o U) 01 m m mr L QN •0 N t 5 N d t aF 5, N °�_ L N N W Z' Z Oaaa a� a� 0mcn—m Z Z C C N y �� >La d as CO z° 3 5 �ry j 3 v m v m U y Y 3 0 0 .� 0 0 U 3 o iA rn .� C7 3 o V ¢— :° — ;° 0 -� 5 :° :� o o c 3>>> L o= ULLF-U�C�LL L 0 0 0= O —i O N Q :Q ��JJ = O UY�LLU ._ 2 0 z W Z mmmmLLLLLLLLm¢ZZUYLL�LLLLLL60 O Z O m O O O O O i0 N O ._ 2 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N D N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 M 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 W N 0 N 0 O O N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 O O O O r N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 W F- a6�oa�oo)rccMMa5izz OMet lnn0 O F aarnrn�CCC��O)�OrrMst� G n n n n : N N N N n N� n n N n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n^ n n n n n n n n n n n n n n W T cc$ T a) Z O > ro ca > T >, >' n3 TT>,� ca O T>'T O O O T� cc TT O c0 Z > Q TTTT 0f a) m 0 U) T >, T TT>1 N t0 t0 t0 a) Co 'O ca 'O >' O Q Q 03 'O R1 � c0 U y T '� 'O ca O C N f�/�) "� N a) C f/) J Q G 'O 'O 'O 'O 0 C a1 'O f0 'O (C 'O N 'O N 'O y 'O (� C -O 'O` f6 ca 'O N - (a fa N N 7 C N a) 7 03 7 7 N a) '6 0 7 7 7 la V) a) a 0 7 Y O Q) (� a) N a) C) a) N N -O 0 C 7 C 7 C 7 N 7 a) 7 Q) 7 Q) 0 7 L 7 L O i0 C 7 C 7 C 7 C 7 la 0 7 L U-0U) la fa 7 �F-F-mF L L 7 � L F-fn 03 7 F- O F- 7 F- 7 F- F- 7 F- InWW F- F- F- F- . F- F-lnfnmfnm M 0 O 0 O 0 lA 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 M 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 6 OD h M 0 M O r 6 4 66 0 0 0 O CO N cn O 6 6 O M O n 0 0 0 In a0 N O J 0 0 0 O O O O O Q r O to N M n n n It is c0 M _ (A M O In is v) (O vi M 0 F E9 FA Efl EA is EA FA EA FA F d9 69 )n fA % is vgi n to (» M Ef) V3 6% (f? FA v) to is is (0 f» Ffl is H% O O to 6s Efl 69 6s L O o 0 M m (3i Es is 000 O N O 000 O O O 00 O O 0 O N 00 O O co O G 0 Lq C O Mr-LO %u9 MOn Ffl (&69 MN is co FA N to MN 6sco N Q FA 0 U.U. O O O O O O (n n rn O o U w is 6s 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f.uu000LrWoO )n W ouioO ',0. "1 n)n o 0it0LO0 't M LO LnLO0L000 LOfM 0 06u 6uino 0 Z 000000000 % to % H9 C4 to 69 69 % WfO f A Ns;; sMtA 6fs iito s A w 2 a � 6 ¢ W O v r0It O W 00 0 O W N 00 n)n N Mrs IT O O N Cl) O (O O W M rN O CO )nry to N a0 Cl) Cl) O n 00 n O nr Mn ) n ao V Cl) N N ZV Q G Z � Z ui QQ O O O O O ON O OCac� ON O .6 CM .6 N� N N O 06 at 0606r CC ccir Er of at cc0i� — ccccx 1-r(Eao� r�mo N E r CO N Cl) ArEMC Cl) o8 M C � ) yu Er y N U U U OocoEE0EE rfEan� Ec pO E i opE0 0 Cu, a — � 9 o O C O o = ccO r 'E 0oO y O w c=— w wOO iUy�6'�mcm na �°a�— oMC oa)iomoo�ood(o�ooaa@ or000a �m= C7M—mco cm5cncaca (nM M M0WdoM OHMUmUoUUCacoNt Z z W w W r > W O o W _m cEcm U N O o y a o y aa) z E E a) rnC cm c `° ai i ¢ v O i `o m me oo 0)>>> E m g m >>> > LL U rncco'M YM f- ZO a >' CLL ( m WM.> a) Coo� 'c - a C w'2 U W L W N O E E E S C¢ d�� u) E E E E 0 w Z p p O E 0 a) N () N d ro O a iC O Y n-a�m�EEE r O) O) N o0Lodc0000 a) as O a) Q Ox�'� o EL2— o m W o o co a) ,ca LOUUU cr w O O O a p T co-0coX - 00000 0 0 0 0 a Zw— 0 c :3 o U)cc-2 a) my CD y N ¢ :� m n ' r a) E a) E co �; Y Y Y U O O O E a) E a) E m O Y O Y rn Y rn Y — F V C C p O U T a) Z •- co O N O. CO O m co O p a a) o) O c (o m a a3 a� cv m co m p U) N rn '� CC COCISCoco O N N N N V- Z w 7 o o U E N ccO n. vcn m (n 3 m � E c>> a N�� Naan ? ���3 Eaaaa co G N �'>� Co co o o a) o 0 o 3 7 o o o L o o o o Z O d CO) o o co 2 a) o o 3 o LLmLL.a Z o m -,711 2 3 Y>adaoLLU- LL a) LLmoCcnxcncnadaULLLLLLLLmoc Z O cOo z 0 z �¢F-HwLLCOCC¢x O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O M O M O N O N O N o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N O N O O N O N O N O O O N O LL,N co ao ao O)OOO MM4�)n )n co (OnnaO co ao aoOO H Nc\O)OOO��r of N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ni N N N N N N M M f Q o n n n n n ni nni nnnni nni i nni nr�i nni �ni nni�:i n w nnn n G m ca W co co a) } T T T T faA cT6 cTo cTE T (o T (o T co TTTO T T ns N cTo cC co co •p (To -p T T T T co (To J } p (To t0 c6 N C can C can Caaa to a7 co O���y0-0" >>>�����a�w wm�ggaaaacn(n co co co nsaa Q aaa hwmaaa(nv,� m d a) a) a) c �F-F d a) d a) >� > > �F-iL > (CO n(ofofn(nfnF-F->�F-�U-U-Wfn(nfnWWf c c c a) a) >� > > > o g c c c c m - d � >a) >a) a) N O O N 0) IM M N O O N 00000000000 O O O o O o O O o O o 0 to M o o 0 CM 0 M 0 N 0 0 J O V:i O 69 O 69 O FA O 69 O 69 O 6-i O 69 O EO O EA O 69 69 J F J O M CO O O F O 0609, O O CO � O 00 C 0 0 0 0 0 rn Q O O 00 O 00 m m m v 0000 0 p O p On 00000 Ooocov 0 o O O LL Cl) O LL o o o 00 LL 64 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O U O V O 0 o 000 0 o O O EA Lo LO 69 Lo 0 0 0 0 ci 0 O O O OOOOOOOOOO O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 OCD 0 0 No 0 0 0 F Z 0 EA 0 69 0 6l> 0 69 0 EA 0 64 0 69 0 V9, 0 6% 0 69 0 69 O fA F Z O_ Z O I- N O O W W N W 2 N h O 661 W 00 tn Cl) OV M�00000 N W n W o 0 0 0 0 V 0 U Z 000 M 0^ ORO pC 0 - V,ZN O QQ Q O O O O O c Q N U U r NEnCs rE OccE O M O O O E O N nCEs JC 0D 0) O wc C13 -Ei = (j Q0U UE� U)Co0U)U)cC4 UUc 02 Fy,. F 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z r Z o rrM -r 00 W W W W M M Cl)c; Lri LL O LL O LL O * E m rn 0 d rn y c c d m W Z p) ._ co CA c' CC_ a> E a) E a)2 > W w�[Co �� E� E� E U O �?'��°'EE00 > — Win¢ o�� o Cm c O ? a ca m¢ o ¢ LL R p C N O C O C d t6�J=W U U L X U (n L X U V w aLU� O. .0 o 2 r� r � a Z cncncnCCaILaQU¢a z O Z ma E E W N 0 N 0 N 0 92�� N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 �2,2m0 N 0 N 0 N 0 F-MQOMCOCO00C���00 N N N N M H N o n n i i n i n n n i n Z o Uaa W C] N > J — •• c d O Z_ O Z <n >. C '2 '2OL 'UO` 'Op 'WO y C C Q Q N 'O O lE N (C O N N O 7 0 a O .O d cncncnHF 7 L 2�32H H azccm