HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.1102.TCRM.Agenda.Packet
NOTICE OF MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL
Mayor Ginny Dickey
Vice Mayor Alan Magazine
Councilmember Gerry Friedel
Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski
Councilmember Peggy McMahon
Councilmember Mike Scharnow
Councilmember David Spelich
TIME:5:30 P.M. – REGULAR MEETING
WHEN:TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2021
WHERE:
FOUNTAIN HILLS COUNCIL CHAMBERS
16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ
Councilmembers of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a quorum of the
Town’s various Commission, Committee or Board members may be in attendance at the Council meeting.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions, parents have a
right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions make a video or audio recording of a minor child.
Meetings of the Town Council are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result, proceedings in which children are present
may be subject to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise their rights may either file written consent with the Town
Clerk to such recording, or take personal action to ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may
be made. If a child is present at the time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents
pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9 have been waived.
REQUEST TO COMMENT
The public is welcome to participate in Council meetings.
TO SPEAK TO AN AGENDA ITEM, please complete a Request to Comment card, located in the back of the Council
Chambers, and hand it to the Town Clerk prior to discussion of that item, if possible. Include the agenda item on which
you wish to comment. Speakers will be allowed three contiguous minutes to address the Council. Verbal comments
should be directed through the Presiding Officer and not to individual Councilmembers.
TO COMMENT ON AN AGENDA ITEM IN WRITING ONLY, please complete a Request to Comment card, indicating it is a
written comment, and check the box on whether you are FOR or AGAINST and agenda item, and hand it to the Town
Clerk prior to discussion, if possible.
TO COMMENT IN WRITING ONLINE: Please feel free to provide your comments by visiting
https://www.fh.az.gov/publiccomment and SUBMIT a Public Comment Card by 3:00 PM on the day of the meeting .
These comments will be shared with the Town Council.
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Town Council, and to the general public, that at
this meeting, the Town Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice
and discussion with the Town's attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S.
§38-431.03(A)(3).
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Dickey
2.MOMENT OF SILENCE
3.ROLL CALL – Mayor Dickey
4.REPORTS BY MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND TOWN MANAGER
A.A PROCLAMATION Declaring November 11, 2021, as Veterans Day.
B.RECOGNITION of Stellar Students of the Month for October.
5.SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES/PRESENTATIONS
6.CALL TO THE PUBLIC
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the
agenda. Any such comment (i) must be within the jurisdiction of the Council, and (ii) is subject to reasonable
time, place, and manner restrictions. The Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised
during Call to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the
conclusion of the Call to the Public, individual councilmembers may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to
review a matter, or (iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Council agenda.
7.CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, noncontroversial matters and will be
enacted by one motion of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all
recommended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a councilmember or member of the public so requests. If a councilmember or member of the public
wishes to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda, he/she may request so prior to the motion to accept the
Consent Agenda or with notification to the Town Manager or Mayor prior to the date of the meeting for
which the item was scheduled. The items will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its
normal sequence on the agenda.
A.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of the minutes of the Joint Work
Session with the Fountain Hills Sanitary District Board of October 12, 2021; the Special
Meeting of October 19, 2021; and the Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021.
Town Council Regular Meeting of November 2, 2021 2 of 4
B.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Liquor License
Application for Sylvester's Bistro & Wine Bar, located at 16726 El Pueblo Boulevard #B,
Fountain Hills, Arizona, for a Series 12 (Restaurant) license.
C.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Liquor License
Application for Fountain View Village, located at 16455 E. Avenue of the Fountains,
Fountain Hills, Arizona, for a Series 12 (Restaurant) license.
D.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Resolution 2021-34, abandoning the 10' Public
Utility and Drainage Easement along the north side of 13010 N Mimosa Drive
E.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Final Plat for Adero Canyon Phase II Parcel 4, a
subdivision containing 33 lots and 8 tracts in the Adero Canyon PAD.
F.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: approving the Second Amendment to
Professional Services Agreement 2021-005 with A&H Painting, Inc. and associated budget
transfers.
8.REGULAR AGENDA
A.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Ordinance 21-13 amending
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Sections 6.02, Definitions, Section 6.07,
General Regulations, and Section 6.08, Sign Requirements and Allowances.
9.COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION to the TOWN MANAGER
Item(s) listed below are related only to the propriety of (i) placing such item(s) on a future agenda for action,
or (ii) directing staff to conduct further research and report back to the Council.
10.ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE
Town Council Regular Meeting of November 2, 2021 3 of 4
Town Council Regular Meeting of November 2,2021 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted in accordance with the statement filed
by the Town Council with the Town Clerk.
Dated this 6121 day of 4C..t �> ,2021.
r- .� �-
, yi.
Elizabeth A. KI-. . MC,Town Clerk
The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities.Please call 480-816-5199(voice)
or 1-800-367-8939(TDD)48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain
agenda information in large print format.Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the Council with this agenda are available
for review in the Clerk's Office.
ITEM 4. A.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Reports Submitting Department: Administration
Prepared by: Angela Padgett-Espiritu, Executive Assistant to Manager, Mayor/Council
Staff Contact Information: Angela Padgett-Espiritu, Executive Assistant to Manager,
Mayor/Council
SPECIAL PUBLIC APPEARANCES/PRESENTATIONS (Agenda Language): A
PROCLAMATION Declaring November 11, 2021, as Veterans Day.
Staff Summary (Background)
Mayor Dickey will be proclaiming November 11, 2021, as Veterans Day.
We are pleased and honored to pay tribute on this day to the dedicated veterans who have served this
great nation with such distinction, both in peacetime and in war; and urge citizens to honor veterans
and commit themselves to unity and the preservation of our liberties.
Attachments
Signed Veteran's Day Proclamation - November 2021
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Director David Pock 10/12/2021 01:08 PM
Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 10/13/2021 09:04 AM
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/13/2021 10:51 AM
Form Started By: Angela Padgett-Espiritu Started On: 10/12/2021 08:39 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/13/2021
ITEM 7. A.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Consent Submitting Department: Administration
Prepared by: Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
Staff Contact Information:
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language): CONSIDERATION AND
POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of the minutes of the Joint Work Session with the Fountain Hills Sanitary
District Board of October 12, 2021; the Special Meeting of October 19, 2021; and the Regular Meeting
of October 19, 2021.
Staff Summary (Background)
The intent of approving meeting minutes is to ensure an accurate account of the discussion and action
that took place at the meeting for archival purposes. Approved minutes are placed on the Town's
website and maintained as permanent records in compliance with state law.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
N/A
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
Staff recommends approving the minutes of the Joint Work Session with the Fountain Hills Sanitary
District Board of October 12, 2021; the Special Meeting of October 19, 2021; and the Regular Meeting
of October 19, 2021.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to approve the minutes of the Joint Work Session with the Fountain Hills Sanitary District Board
of October 12, 2021; the Special Meeting of October 19, 2021; and the Regular Meeting of October 19,
2021.
Attachments
2021.1012.JWS
2021.1019.TCSMES.Minutes
2021.1019.TCRM.Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/25/2021 06:00 PM
Form Started By: Elizabeth A. Klein Started On: 10/25/2021 05:15 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/25/2021
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION
OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL
AND THE FOUNTAIN HILLS SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD
OCTOBER 12, 2021
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Dickey
Mayor Dickey called the Joint Work Session of October 12, 2021, to order at 5:30 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL – Mayor Dickey
Present: Mayor Ginny Dickey; Councilmember Mike Scharnow; Councilmember Gerry
Friedel; Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski; Councilmember Peggy
McMahon
Absent: Vice Mayor Alan Magazine; Councilmember David Spelich
Staff
Present:
Town Manager Grady Miller; Town Attorney Aaron Arnson; Acting Town Clerk
Angela Padgett-Espiritu
Fountain Hills Sanitary District Board Members Present: Vice Chairman Bob Thomson,
Board Member Tammy Bell, Board Member Jerry Butler
Fountain Hills Sanitary District Board Members Absent: Chairman Michael Maroon and
Board Member Gregg Dudash
Fountain Hills Sanitary District Staff Present: District Manager Dana Trompke, P.E. and
District Attorney Dan Jones.
3.DISCUSSION regarding Value of Intergovernmental Agreement between Town of Fountain
Hills and Fountain Hills Sanitary District.
Mr. Miller said that he had included a copy of the current Intergovernmental Agreement for
everyone's information. Mayor Dickey said that there has been some questions in the past,
but they are all serving the same constituents.
Mr. Miller and Ms. Trompke briefly reviewed the agreement. Mayor Dickey asked if either
side was looking to make changes. Mr. Miller said that since they have had the restroom
facilities built at Fountain Park, the Town is paying the cost of operations and maintenance.
Ms. Trompke noted some quick figures, such as the District provides sewer service for 12
different buildings/services at an approximate expense of $10,600 per year. They provide
reclaimed water delivery of an average of 110,000,000 gallons per year, or approximately
$125,000 per year. This is all a total cost savings of $135,600 per year.
Mr. Miller review some examples of unmeasurqable efforts involving coordination and
working well together: reclaimed water delivery and timing at three parks, overseeding, etc.;
Coordinating repair activities at well facilities within Fountain Park; Collection system staff
and Public Works/Streets staff fen coordinate on construction activities in ROWs, sewer
service repairs and major roadway repairs; Coordination of wash cleaning and repair
activities; and District staff euqipment helping clean up clogged storm draings in a pinch
and used a crane to life statues.
4.DISCUSSION regarding joint District-Council working group to develop strategies to reduce
sodium pollution.
Member Butler said that his comments are he has not shared them with anyone. He first
wanted to recognize Mayor Dickey and Chairman Maroon for creating the committee,
stating it was a long time coming. He thanked the members of the Committee, Board
Member Tammy Bell and Councilmembers Sharron Grzybowski and Mike Scharnow, along
with the Town Manager and Dana Trompke. He said that they have had two previous
meetings at which time discussion was held on possibly having the District buy potassium
chloride in bulk to sell to residents needing to replace their systems.
He said that the issue is that the Town has hard drinking water, so there are a lot of water
softeners. The sodium chloride used in those softeners causes the sodium levels to shoot
up in the wastewater. During their meetings that discussed how to reduce the sodium
chloride, perhaps through a rebate program or banning the use of it. However, "mandate"
is not a nice word for many residents.
From those discussions the Town's PIO created an article, similar to what was included in
the Town's newsletter. At their third meeting, they were going to review public comment, but
the public did not speak up. Some letters went to Fountain Hills Times and Facebook, but,
to date, the District has not received any phone calls.
As a retired engineer, he said that 85% of the drinking water in the US is considered hard
water. Drinking water begins with an amount of sodium around 100 ppm. After everyone
disposes of their waste, once it gets to the Sanitary District, it contains around 250 ppm.
They estimate that 70% of all water softeners use sodium chloride. Each 40 pound bag of
sodium chloride contains 15 pounds of salt. The wastewater is used primarily for golf
courses and parks. The bottom line is that the sodium in the wastewater is not a town hall
problem, nor is it the Sanitary District's problem; it is a community problem.
He said that there is technology to correct this, but it is very expensive ($20 million) and
would increase operations and maintenance by 10%. The money to pay for such
equipment would have to come from the residents. He said that it is clear that residents
want soft water and sodium chloride is their choice. Hopefully over time people will switch.
Councilmember Scharnow said that was a good summation. It is not a simple solution. He
said that he is all in favor of a public awareness campaign, but unless people are directly
impact, he would still like to consider a rebate program. Councilmember Grzybowski said
that last week in the Leadership Academy after the tour of the sanitary district, they were
dumbfounded.
Mayor Dickey said that it is not just the Town's issue; it's everywhere. She said, only half
kiddingly, that they need some potassium chloride lobbyists. Member Butler said that they
did not talk about going to the legislature because of the word "mandate."
Councilmember McMahon said that pollution is a strong word. They are educating the
community, but perhaps they should encourage the realtors and builders to change their
Joint Work Session of October 12, 2021 2 of 5
systems. They should have multiple campaigns. Member Butler said that he thought it
would take time, through word of mouth.
Member Bell said that they have seen in the history of Fountain Hills the impact of
volunteers. She would like to see the residents get more involved, and get a larger
committee going, expanding their efforts.
Councilmember Friedel said that he liked the idea of a rebate. He asked if they had any
way to gauge how many systems have been switched over. Member Butler said that he did
not know of any recording of that information.
Councilmember Scharnow asked if MAG (Maricopa Association of Governments) was
tapping into this issue some. Mr. Miller said that there has been some talk, but it has not
gone anywhere. He did think it will come up with them when they are discussing water
quality. Councilmember Scharnow said that he thought it would be a good idea for MAG to
take this on.
Councilmember Scharnow said that they were trying to spread a similar message of not
flushing unused medicines into the system. He said that their campaign has been working
to reduce the amounts.
Member Bell said that they have never required permits for water softeners. The only way
to acquire that information would have been through a permitting process.
Mayor Dickey said that they should set a goal. She asked about encouraging the use of
potassium chloride. She said that it is not the cure-all, but it is a step in the right direction.
5.DISCUSSION regarding Well 1 control building location and improvements at Fountain Park.
Ms. Trompke said that they recently installed the two restroom facilities at Fountain Park,
which also housed the District's equipment. They need to do the same thing with Well 1
which is located in the Great Lawn area where a lot of activities take place. She said that
they do not need a bathroom and do not want a building. They want to be able to get
vehicles in to the site without having to cross major pedestrian routes. She is working with
Town staff to find the best approach.
Mr. Miller said that he was very appreciative of Ms. Trompke. He was concerned with the
location as well. The Town is willing to do what they can to help. Member Thomson said
that he appreciated that help.
6.DISCUSSION regarding proposed Fountain Lake improvement projects and future timing.
Mr. Miller said that he had included a copy of the Black & Veatch report for information only.
He said that it indicates that they may have another five to ten years left on the liner, but
they wanted to let the District be aware that this project will be programmed in the future.
He said that Black & Veatch reached out to Ms. Trompke and her staff, and they were able
to provide some good information.
He said that at one point he and Ms. Trompke had discussed a storage system, and they
are now looking to have that in place within two years.
Joint Work Session of October 12, 2021 3 of 5
Mayor Dickey said that she appreciate all of their work, and with the Rescue funds the
Town has been able to put some funds away to help fund these improvements.
Mr. Miller said that the storage system would be treated water from the Sanitary District,
but it would not have the build up of sodium that occurs over time.
Councilmember Grzybowski asked about chemicals used to treat the water and its impact
on fish and birds. Mr. Miller said that the chemicals are used to stop algae. They would be
consulting with engineers. Councilmember Grzybrowski that is important to residents.
Member Butler directed a comment to Mr. Burns, noting that he had made a comment that
the drinking water in Fountain Hills has about 100 ppm, the wastewater has about 250 ppm
and the lake has around 600 ppm. But, it all varies; those numbers are not set in concrete.
7.DISCUSSION regarding coordination of wash maintenance in areas of District utility
easements.
Mr. Miller said that this issue has come up in the past--brought up by both Councilmember
Friedel and Councilmember Spelich. He said that he and Ms. Trompke have addressed it,
and he believes that the District is doing the best it can that the vegetation is not eliminated.
It did happen, and some of it was bottlebrush. They do a lot of organization between staff
and the District, but a lot of the utility easements are right in the washes.
Ms. Trompke said that the original planner constructed a sewer system that was
cost-effective. There are 209 miles of gravity sewer lines, but only 9 miles are located in
washes. The rest are in right-of-way or other utility easements. She said that they do have
to get in and have to clean quickly. Her understanding is that they do not remove large
trees. They generally have an easement and do coordinate.
Mr. Miller said that while vegetation is important, the bigger issue is the long-term parts of
the stormwater system, where homes are getting dangerously close to the washes. He said
that the Maricopa County Flood Control District currently has a study going on to evaluate
all washes and dams. They will be working with the Public Works Director to ensure they
have a presentation before Council. He said that they have just started seeing some of the
underlying issues with the past storm season.
Ms. Trompke noted that there is balance between keeping vegetationiand fire hazards.
Councilmember Friedel said that in the past the road and wall was seeded to help keep
them in place. The wash is now seven feet closer to his house. He believes that the
neighborhood is being put at risk.
Mr. Miller said that the Town will continue to work with the District and bring something to
Council shortly.
Councilmember Scharnow said that the Flood Control Study will be great; there is a
constant battle between maintenance and fire mitigation.
Councilmember Friedel noted, going back to the sodium issue, that perhaps they should be
letting the public know when the numbers go down, to show the public that they are working
on the issue. Member Butler said that the numbers vary monthly. Mr. Trompke said that it is
Joint Work Session of October 12, 2021 4 of 5
something they measure regularly, but it would be very slow.
8.ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski, SECONDED BY Councilmember Gerry
Friedel to adjourn.
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
The Joint Meeting of the Fountain Hills Town Council and Fountain Hills Sanitary District
Board held October 12, 2021, adjourned at 6:38 p.m.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
____________________________
Ginny Dickey, Mayor
ATTEST AND PREPARED BY:
______________________________
Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
Joint Work Session of October 12, 2021 5 of 5
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL
OCTOBER 19, 2021
1.CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Dickey
Mayor Dickey called the Special Meeting (Executive Session) of October 19, 2021, to order at
4:30 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL – Mayor Dickey
Present: Mayor Ginny Dickey; Councilmember Mike Scharnow; Councilmember Gerry
Friedel; Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski
Absent: Councilmember David Spelich; Councilmember Peggy McMahon; Vice Mayor Alan
Magazine
Staff
Present:
Town Manager Grady E. Miller; Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson
3.RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
MOVED BY Councilmember Mike Scharnow, SECONDED BY Councilmember Sharron
Grzybowski to recess into Executive Session.
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
4.EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Fountain Hills Town Council recessed into Executive Session at 4:30 p.m.
A. Discussion or consideration of employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion,
dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee or employee of any
public body, except that, with the exception of salary discussions, an officer, appointee or
employee may demand that the discussion or consideration occur at a public meeting. The
public body shall provide the officer, appointee or employee with written notice of the executive
session as is appropriate but not less than twenty-four hours for the officer, appointee or
employee to determine whether the discussion or consideration should occur at a public meeting,
pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1).
i.Annual Review of Town Manager
5.ADJOURNMENT
The Fountain Hills Town Council reconvened into Open Session at 5:24 p.m. at which time the
Special Meeting of October 19, 2021, adjourned.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
____________________________
Ginny Dickey, Mayor
ATTEST AND PREPARED BY:
______________________________
Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
Town Council Special Meeting of October 19, 2021 2 of 2
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL
OCTOBER 19, 2021
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Dickey
Mayor Diickey called the Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021, to order at 5:32 p.m. and
led the Town Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
2.MOMENT OF SILENCE
A Moment of Silence was held.
3.ROLL CALL – Mayor Dickey
Present: Mayor Ginny Dickey; Councilmember Mike Scharnow; Councilmember Gerry
Friedel; Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski
Absent: Vice Mayor Alan Magazine; Councilmember Peggy McMahon; Councilmember
David Spelich
Staff
Present:
Town Manager Grady E. Miller; Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson; Town Clerk
Elizabeth A. Klein
4.REPORTS BY MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND TOWN MANAGER
Town Manager Grady Miller said that the Mayor will be reading a proclamation in a few
minutes, but he wanted to say how proud he is to work for Fountain Hills. He said that
their employees do a great job of providing services to the residents, and part of the
reason for the proclamation is to recognize the employees. He said that on Thursday
Town employees will receive a boxed lunch as a thank you for their service.
Councilmember Grzybowski said that they had subcommittee interviews for
boards/commissions, and she encouraged residents to keep an eye on the Town's
website. She said that it was a great opportunity for them to be involved in the community.
She said that they held a Make a Difference Day committee meeting and participants can
start picking up their t-shirts tomorrow between 8 AM and 4 PM at the Community Center.
She reported that the Bioliphic Committee met yesterday and they had given a
presentation to the Community Services Advisory Commission in September. They are
looking for volunteers and sponsors. Early next year they will present to the Town Council.
Mayor Dickey said that in the past the Make a Difference Day activities would begin with a
gathering at Golden Eagle Park, but due to COVID, they will be going straight to the work
sites. She did a short video, with the help of Paul and Kim, on the program.
Mayor Dickey reported that last week they held a joint meeting with the Fountain Hills
Sanitary District Board and talked about salt and other improvements at the lake, the well,
washes, etc.
She said that Tom Belshe, Executive Director of the League, had invited mayors and
councils to the open house at the Mesa LDS Temple.
She said that the League did a webinar on redistricting, and she has shared the link and
draft maps with the Council. She said that they are asking for input from the public.
A.PROCLAMATION: Declaring October 17 - 23, 2021, as Arizona Cities & Towns Week.
Mayor Dickey read a proclamation proclaiming October 17-23, 2021, as Arizona Cities
and Towns Week.
5.SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES/PRESENTATIONS
A.PRESENTATION: Monthly Report by Captain Kratzer of the Maricopa County Sheriff's
Office.
Captain Kratzer of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office gave a monthly update, noting
that with ten months' worth of statistics since the Safety Corridors went into effect, they
have had a total of 2,345 traffic stops. Of those, 49% have occurred on Saguaro and
Palisades. He said that with added enforcement and requests of deputies to be visible, he
is satisfied with those efforts. He said that of the 49%, 70% were on Saguaro and 30%
were on Palisades.
He said that at one time they talked about having zero tolerance, but he had concerns with
that taking away the authority of the deputies. People are warned before they get a ticket.
That percentage is Citations 70% and Warnings 30%. That is higher than the typical
average because they are enforcing it more strictly. A large majority of that is for speed
(80%) with numerous criminal charges, which is 25 mph over the speed limit. They have
also had citations for driving on a suspended license, and stop sign violations, particularly
around the fountain.
For upcoming events, they will be involved with the Fountain Hills Cares event, where the
Community Outreach staff from Maricopa County will be in attendance, and also they
have the Prescription Drug Take Back event, which is the same day as Make a Difference
Day, from 10 am to 2 pm right outside Town Hall. Councilmember Scharnow noted that
the Drug Coalition will have a few out helping them as well.
Mayor Dickey conveyed condolences to the Sheriff's Office for the recent loss of Deputy
Juan Ruiz. She said that they all mourn with them. It was such a waste and tragedy, and
she appreciated Captain Kratzer being at the meeting this evening.
Mayor Dickey thanked Captain Kratzer for the statistics. She said that the Pedestrian and
Traffic Safety Committee has talked about increasing fines, and they will continue those
discussions. She said that they appreciate all that the Sheriff's Office has been doing.
Captain Kratzer said that there have been some concerns voiced about the 9-1-1 system.
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 2 of 10
He said that he cannot answer the technical questions, but if someone has an issue, they
should call him and he can contact those with the answers. He said that in Queen Creek
they had a 5-10 minute presentation given on dispatching, but if they were not interested
in that, perhaps they could put something together and place it on the Town's website. He
said that there is some confusion when someone calls in it sounds like a fax machine, but
that is the equipment for the hearing impaired.
Mr. Miller said that if there is a specific incident or call for service, they can have that
looked into and any mitigating circumstances.
B.PRESENTATION: Town of Fountain Hills New Website Look
Bo Larsen, Fountain Hills Community Relations Manager, gave a brief review of the
Town's new website look. He noted that there is a new web address for the Town,
www.fountainhillaz.gov. He said that the old address will still work for now, but this is
being done for security reasons. He thanked those on staff that helped view websites
from all over the country and gave them ideas for making the site better.
Councilmember Grzybowski said that she thought it looked fantastic. She liked the colors
and said it was easy to read. Mayor Dickey said that she agreed; she appreciated all of
the work that went into it.
C.RECOGNITION : Outgoing Board/Commission Members
Mayor Dickey read a statement on each of the following commissioners, and thanked
them for their service. She then presented a Certificate of Appreciate to each:
John McHugh, Strategic Planning Advisory Commission (not present)
Carol Carroll, Sister Cities Advisory Commission
Tom Aielllo, McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission
6.CALL TO THE PUBLIC
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the
agenda. Any such comment (i) must be within the jurisdiction of the Council, and (ii) is subject to reasonable
time, place, and manner restrictions. The Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during
Call to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion of
the Call to the Public, individual councilmembers may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or
(iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Council agenda.
None
7.CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, noncontroversial matters and will be
enacted by one motion of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all
recommended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a councilmember or member of the public so requests. If a councilmember or member of the public
wishes to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda, he/she may request so prior to the motion to accept the
Consent Agenda or with notification to the Town Manager or Mayor prior to the date of the meeting for which
the item was scheduled. The items will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda.
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 3 of 10
MOVED BY Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski, SECONDED BY Councilmember Mike
Scharnow to approve Consent Agenda Items 7-A through 7-H.
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
A.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of the minutes of the Regular
Meeting of September 21, 2021, and the Regular Meeting of October 5, 2021.
B.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Community Foundation for a beer and wine garden in
conjunction with the Flutter at the Fountain event held on November 5 and 6, 2021.
C.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Theater, Inc. for alcohol in conjunction with the Fountain
Hills Theater, Inc. for Opening Night on November 5, 2021.
D.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Theater, Inc. for alcohol in conjunction with the Fountain
Hills Theater, Inc. for Opening Night on December 3, 2021.
E.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Theater, Inc for alcohol in conjunction with the Fountain
Hills Theater, Inc., for Opening Night on January 7, 2022.
F.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Theater, Inc. for alcohol in conjunction with the Fountain
Hills Theater, Inc. for Opening Night on January 28, 2022.
G.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Theater, Inc. for alcohol in conjunction with the Fountain
Hills Theater, Inc. for Opening Night on March 18, 2022.
H.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License
application for the Fountain Hills Theater, Inc. for alcohol in conjunction with the Fountain
Hills Theater, Inc. for Opening Night on April 15, 2022.
8.REGULAR AGENDA
A.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Appointments to the Board of Adjustment,
Community Services Advisory Commission, McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission,
Sister Cities Advisory Commission, and the Strategic Planning Advisory Commission.
MOVED BY Councilmember Mike Scharnow, SECONDED BY Councilmember Gerry
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 4 of 10
MOVED BY Councilmember Mike Scharnow, SECONDED BY Councilmember Gerry
Friedel to appoint the following:
Board of Adjustment
10/31/24
10/31/22
Jeremy Smith
Erik Hansen
Community Services Advisory Commission
04/30/24
Craig Rudolphy
McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission
10/31/24
10/31/24
10/31/24
Scott Grzybowski
Bill Craig
Brian Jennings
Sister Cities Advisory Commission
10/31/24
10/31/24
10/31/24
Lisa Ristuccia
Bev Tall
Zarrin Caldwell
Strategic Planning Advisory Commission
04/30/22
Bernie Hoele
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
B.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Acceptance of public art concept
for Keystone Homes - The Havenly Fountain Hills development.
Community Services Director Rachael Goodwin said that the developer and artist are at
the meeting this evening. She said that the general concept is shown in the packet and
they also had a model to show the Council. She said that this project does meet the 1/2%
as outlined in the Public Arts Policy.
Jeff King, representing Keystone Homes, came forward with the model and said they are
pleased to be part of the community. He said that it has gone well so far working with
John Wesley and the engineering staff. He said that the part of the process of public art
was new to them, but Ms. Goodwin walked them through the process. They went out to
six different artists and selected Craig Randich. He said that what is being proposed fits
well with their community, both architecturally and durability-wise, and includes the
shadow play around the plantings.
Mr. Randich came forward and said that the model is based off of taking the fountain and
turning it upside down. It has to do with shadows on the ground and the sculpture.
Councilmember Scharnow said that some of the photos in the packet included canvas. He
asked if this piece would include canvas over it. Mr. Randich said that it was designed
without the fabric, but he is open to the idea of having canvas to add more shade factor.
Councilmember Scharnow said that it also mentioned it would have a rusticated surface.
He said that Scottsdale has put up bus stops along Shea with that type of material, and it
tends to leave discoloration on the sidewalk. Mr. Randich said that there would most likely
be some rust happening, Mr. King noted that there will be decomposed granite under the
structure so it would not affect the sidewalk.
Councilmember Grzybowski said that she loves the concept of useable art. She said that
as a general rule she is not a fan of public art on private space, but in this case, it is not
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 5 of 10
hidden from the public so everyone can use it. Mayor Dickey noted that one of the rules is
that it has to be accessible for the public.
MOVED BY Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski, SECONDED BY Councilmember Mike
Scharnow to accept the public art application for the sculpture and authorize it to be
installed at the designated location at The Havenly.
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
C.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Resolution 2021-32 approving Amendment
Two to the Intergovernmental Agreement with Maricopa County relating to the
maintenance, improvement and management of outdoor recreation opportunities in the
McDowell Mountain Preserve and McDowell Regional Park.
Ms. Goodwin said that this allows the Town to cooperate with the adjacent McDowell
Mountain Park which is good since they have adjoining trails and can coordinate
maintenance.
Councilmember Scharnow said that he thought this was very good. He loves this kind of
working together, and it works in with the Master Plan approved last year and is not
duplicating efforts.
MOVED BY Councilmember Gerry Friedel, SECONDED BY Councilmember Sharron
Grzybowski to adopt Resolution 2021-32 approving Amendment Two to the
Intergovernmental Agreement with Maricopa County.
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
D.CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION: Options for possible amendment to Section
11-1-7, Noise, of the Town Code.
Mayor Dickey said that they started this conversation a month or so ago. Mr. Miller said
that the Town Council was questioning why they were making changes; it appeared that
the Council was leaning toward maintaining status quo. He said that Mr. Wesley will be
leading the discussion, but the Town Prosecutor was unable to attend the last meeting,
and he was joining them tonight via telephone to answer some questions. Mr. Wesley
said that the Town Prosecutor, Mark Iacovino, and Captain Kratzer would be able to
answer the questions best. He said that the prior recommendation was to eliminate the
decibel approach because that approach has been a challenge for the officers and the
court.
Mr. Iacovino said that he has gone back and redid some of his research on what various
communities use. He said that he checked 13 different cities. Paradise Valley, Cave
Creek and Sedona use the decibel method, but Sedona has dedicated staff managing
their noise ordinance. Four others use a combination of decibel and "unreasonable noise"
and the others use just the "unreasonable noise."
He said that noise is an important issue in Fountain Hills. They have had two different
noise ordinances as there are two approaches to enforcing unwanted noise--the decibel
limit and the "unreasonable noise" approach. Talking about decibel limits has an appeal
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 6 of 10
because it is an objective standard. Unfortunately, it is not nearly that simple. There are
two primary problems using decibel limits. First is the ambient noise. When a deputy goes
out to a site, the meter is not just registering the noise from the party down the street. It is
also registering traffic, wind, insects, air conditioner compressors, etc. and that ambient
noise level can be significant. The problem is there is no way to separate the ambient
noise from the offending noise. The other problem is that the decibel level from any noise
source will be very different depending on the location of where you take the reading. The
terrain, vegetation, lack of vegetation, buildings, sound reflective surfaces nearby, wind
direction and strength, humidity and temperature all play a part. He said that he is not an
advocate for an ordinance based on decibel.
Mr. Iacovino said that going with the "unreasonable noise" standard is much more
workable. It takes into account the hour of the day, location, day of the week, etc. It is a
definition they have used in disorderly conduct statutes. He would strongly advocate an
ordinance that is based on the "unreasonable noise" standard rather than decibel levels.
Councilmember Scharnow said that he was one that originally questioned the
recommendation, but Mr. Iacovino has enlightened them. Mr. Iacovino said that the
ambient noise argument is what defense attorneys use to get people off the hook. If he
was representing someone for noise, his first question would be when it took place and
where, and what the ambient noise level was. The officer is going to say they do not know
and that will be the end of the case.
He said that Cave Creek is one of the based on decibels. He was a prosecutor there for
many years and last week he spoke with Adam Stein who said that it is unenforceable
because the ambient noise levels are so high.
Councilmember Scharnow said that they do not want something on the books that does
not do anything. He asked Mr. Iacovino if the chances were better if they cited under the
"unreasonable noise" standard. Mr. Iacovino replied that they had a much greater chance
for success with that standard.
Councilmember Grzybowski said that she is also one of the ones hesitant to not include
the decibel reading, but Mr. Iacovino did a great job of explaining it. She said that there is
a strong inclination for subjective and objective, she understands. The problem she has is
with "reasonable;' there is nothing objective about "unreasonable."
Mr. Iacovino said that there are many laws that require reasonable efforts or require
actions such as "reasonable." He said that using a "reasonable" standard objectifies
different types of analyses. At some point, they have to put some faith in a judge that is
going to hear a case. That is the flip side of the argument. With the use of "unreasonable,"
they take into account all the various factors. What is reasonable at 8 AM is not the same
at 2 AM, or on weekends versus week days. The "unreasonable noise" standard allows
the judge to take all of those circumstances into account. He said that he understood the
hesitation, but it is the best they can reasonably do.
Mr. Arnson said that he was hesitant coming into this discussion as he was questioning
why they were making changes, but Mr. Iacovino has made him a believer with the
research he has done. He echoed what Mr. Iacovino said about "reasonable" as from day
one in school talking about tort and negligence, they use the "reasonable person" with
respect to legal standards. There is no one test that can work for every situation.
Mayor Dickey said that a concern brought up last time had to do with any kind of
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 7 of 10
electronic music, and duration. She asked if those issues are brought into the argument in
considering reasonable versus unreasonable. And, she asked if it had to be measured
when it is happening.
Mr. Wesley said that he pulled up one of the ordinances, and there are 14 different criteria
to help determine "unreasonable" such as volume, intensity, usual/unusual, proximity,
time of day, etc. and a lot of those factors can be considered in making the determination.
Mr. Iacovino said that they could adopt some guidelines, but ultimately they want
something simple and as straight forward as possible. He said that they need to balance
those two concerns.
Town Clerk Elizabeth Klein noted that two written comment cards were received. One
from Betsy LaVoie, Director of the Chamber of Commerce, who was opposed to doing
away with the decibel standard. The other from James Ruff, who supported staff's
recommendation to do away with it.
Councilmember Scharnow said that it is hard to say what they want. Staff should come up
with something and they can go from there. They need to rely on the experts and
professionals in terms of advice.
Mr. Miller said that they heard from the subject experts, and the Town's counselor. He
said that they also had some minor housekeeping they were doing to the previous
ordinance, so they will come back with an ordinance that encompasses what has been
discussed. He said that they will remove the decibel levels, and will have a staff
presentation.
Councilmember Friedel said that the music was a good point. The Town does its best to
comply with special events. There is a reason why they have to end at a certain time, so
those around Fountain Park are not disturbed.
Councilmember Grzybowski said that there are quite a few business owners watching. As
hard as it is to see subjective versus objective and "reasonable" Mr. Arnson has eased
her mind, and Captain Kratzer did not support the decibel reading. She believed that she
would go with what the subject matter experts recommend.
E.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Ordinance 21-13
amending Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Sections 6.02, Definitions,
Section 6.07, General Regulations, and Section 6.08, Sign Requirements and Allowances.
(ACTION TO BE TAKEN TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO NOVEMBER 2,
2021, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING)
Mayor Dickey opened the Public Hearing. She said that they need a robust discussion on
this issue and since they are missing three members from the meeting this evening she
would like to continue it.
MOVED BY Councilmember Gerry Friedel, SECONDED BY Councilmember Mike
Scharnow to continue the Public Hearing to November 2, 2021.
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 8 of 10
F.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving One Arizona Distribution of
Opioid Settlement Funds Agreement.
Mr. Arnson said that the staff report gives a full summary of this item, but last year the
Town Council approved entering into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the
opioid issue. Fourteen states joined in, including the State of Arizona. This is the next step
that updates the terms of the MOU addressing the mechanisms for payment and executes
two final agreements. He said that everything needs to be executed on or before January
2 of next year. They are looking at $549 million for the State's share of the settlement,
and of that there is a 44% state / 56% cities and towns split, based on population. He said
that the payments will be on a rolling basis in April of next year. The amount of payment
will depend on the number of municipalities that sign onto it and payment of attorneys
fees. Mr. Pock figured out the Town's amount to be around $1.2 to $1.3 million. The funds
are to be used for public health and safety related issues, primarily opioids.
Mr. Miller said that one of the issues they will need to identify is how to use that money. At
the Council Retreat next February they will talk about different options for its use.
Councilmember Scharnow said that he did not see population in any of the criteria. Mr.
Arnson said that he has not been directly involved, but they have to use some objective
factors, and he would assume it would be based on population.
9.COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION to the TOWN MANAGER
Item(s) listed below are related only to the propriety of (i) placing such item(s) on a future agenda for action, or
(ii) directing staff to conduct further research and report back to the Council.
Councilmember Friedel said that in the past couple of days he was approached by
citizens who mentioned that the Town used to have a recycling program. He asked if that
was something they wanted to get back into. Mr. Miller said that they do now have
curbside recycling, but he would look into it further and report back to the Council.
10.ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY Councilmember Gerry Friedel, SECONDED BY Councilmember Sharron
Grzybowski to adjourn.
Vote: 4 - 0 Passed - Unanimously
The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Town Council held October 19, 2021,
adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
____________________________
Ginny Dickey, Mayor
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021 9 of 10
ATTEST AND PREPARED BY:
______________________________
Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular
Meeting held by the Town Council of Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on the 19th day
of of October, 2021. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present.
DATED this 2nd day of November, 2021.
_________________________________
Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
Town Council Regular Meeting of October 19, 2021
10 of 10
ITEM 7. B.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Consent Submitting Department: Administration
Prepared by: Kukkola Sonia, Financial Services Technician
Staff Contact Information: David Pock, Finance Director
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language): PUBLIC HEARING,
CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Liquor License Application for Sylvester's
Bistro & Wine Bar, located at 16726 El Pueblo Boulevard #B, Fountain Hills, Arizona, for a Series 12
(Restaurant) license.
Staff Summary (Background)
The purpose of this item is to obtain the Town Council's recommendation regarding a liquor license
application submitted by Paul Sylvester Evans, owner of Sylvester's Bistro & Wine Bar, for submission to
the Arizona Department of Liquor. Staff reviewed the liquor license application and found that it is in full
compliance with Town ordinances.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
A.R.S.§4-201; 4-202;4-203 &4-205 and R19-1-102 and R19-1-311.
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
Staff recommends approval of the liquor license application.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to approve a series #12 liquor license application for Sylvester's Bistro & Wine Bar.
Attachments
Liquor License Application
Departmental Recommendation
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Director David Pock 10/20/2021 07:05 AM
Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 10/20/2021 03:40 PM
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/22/2021 01:59 PM
Form Started By: Kukkola Sonia Started On: 10/19/2021 04:08 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2021
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE MEMO
TO: (as applicable)
• Streets Division
• Fire Department
• Building Division
• Community Services
• Development Services
• Law Enforcement
• Licensing
DATE: 10/7/21
FR: Sonia Kukkola,
Financial Services Technician
RE: Liquor License Application
Attached is a Liquor License Application for staff review.
Review the application, then mark or sign, indicating staff’s recommendation for approval (with or
without stipulations) or denial.
If staff’s recommendation is to deny and/or there are stipulations for approval, please attach a memo
that specifies the reasoning and the memo will be forwarded on to the Town Council for their
consideration of this application.
Name of Organization: Sylvester’s Bistro & Wine Bar, 16726 El Pueblo Blvd, Fountain Hills AZ 85268
Applicant: Paul Evans
Date(s) of Event: N/A
Date Application Received: 09/08/21 Town Council Agenda Date: 11/2/21
STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION:
Department/Division Staff Member Approved Denied N/A
P & Z John Wesley X
Community Services Linda Ayres X
Building Safety Peter Johnson X
Fire Department Dave Ott X
Law Enforcement Larry Kratzer X
Licensing Sonia Kukkola X
Street Department Jeff Pierce X
Attach report for denial or any recommendation requiring stipulations.
ITEM 7. C.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Consent Submitting Department: Administration
Prepared by: Kukkola Sonia, Financial Services Technician
Staff Contact Information: David Pock, Finance Director
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language): PUBLIC HEARING,
CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Liquor License Application for Fountain View
Village, located at 16455 E. Avenue of the Fountains, Fountain Hills, Arizona, for a Series 12 (Restaurant)
license.
Staff Summary (Background)
The purpose of this item is to obtain the Town Council's recommendation regarding a liquor license
application submitted by Andrea Dahlman Lewkowitz, agent of Fountain View Village, for submission to
the Arizona Department of Liquor. Staff reviewed the liquor license application and found that it is in full
compliance with Town ordinances.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
A.R.S.§4-201; 4-202;4-203 &4-205 and R19-1-102 and R19-1-311.
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
Staff recommends approval of the liquor license application.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to approve a series #12 liquor license application for Fountain View Village.
Attachments
Liquor License Application
Departmental Recommendation
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Director David Pock 10/20/2021 07:08 AM
Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 10/20/2021 03:40 PM
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/22/2021 02:01 PM
Form Started By: Kukkola Sonia Started On: 10/19/2021 05:19 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2021
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
INTER OFFICE MEMO
TO: (as applicable)
• Streets Division
• Fire Department
• Building Division
• Community Services
• Development Services
• Law Enforcement
• Licensing
DATE: 10/7/21
FR: Sonia Kukkola,
Financial Services Technician
RE: Liquor License Application
Attached is a Liquor License Application for staff review.
Review the application, then mark or sign, indicating staff’s recommendation for approval (with or
without stipulations) or denial.
If staff’s recommendation is to deny and/or there are stipulations for approval, please attach a memo
that specifies the reasoning and the memo will be forwarded on to the Town Council for their
consideration of this application.
Name of Organization: Fountain view Village , 16455 E. Ave of the Fountains, Fountain Hills AZ 85268
Applicant: Andrea Dahlman Lewkowitz
Date(s) of Event: N/A
Date Application Received: 09/28/21 Town Council Agenda Date: 11/2/21
STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION:
Department/Division Staff Member Approved Denied N/A
P & Z John Wesley X
Community Services Linda Ayres X
Building Safety Peter Johnson X
Fire Department Dave Ott X
Law Enforcement Larry Kratzer X
Licensing Sonia Kukkola X
Street Department Jeff Pierce X
Attach report for denial or any recommendation requiring stipulations.
ITEM 7. D.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Consent Submitting Department: Public Works
Prepared by: David Janover, Town Engineer
Staff Contact Information: Justin Weldy, Public Works Director
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language): CONSIDERATION AND
POSSIBLE ACTION: Resolution 2021-34, abandoning the 10' Public Utility and Drainage Easement along
the north side of 13010 N Mimosa Drive
Staff Summary (Background)
This is a proposal to abandon the pre-incorporation 10' Public Utility and Drainage Easement along the
northern property line of Plat 602-B, Block 2, Lot 30 (13010 N Mimosa Drive). Mr. Conner Teich, the
applicant of this request, plans to shift the existing retaining rock wall further north and elevate the
grade within the existing easement, so he can utilize more of the side yard of the property.
Staff has reviewed the site to determine potential on-site drainage issues in addition to the Town's
general interest in the easement. There is no need for the Town to retain the drainage easement
proposed to be abandoned, with the understanding that the owner of the lot is required to pass the
developed flows generated by the upstream lots across their property. All public utilities have approved
the abandonment of this easement.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
N/A
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2021-34.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to adopt Resolution 2021-34.
Attachments
Vicinity Map
Exhibit A: Survey
Aerial Photo Map
Res 2021-34
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Klein 10/14/2021 10:15 AM
Development Services Director John Wesley 10/14/2021 10:22 AM
Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 10/14/2021 03:26 PM
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/18/2021 08:10 AM
Form Started By: David Janover Started On: 10/11/2021 07:40 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/18/2021
BEELINE
H
W
Y
SHEA BLVDPALISADES BLVDSAGUARO BLVD SAGUARO BLVDPALISA
D
E
S
B
L
V
D
PALISAD
E
S
B
L
V
D
SA
G
U
A
R
O
B
L
V
DFOUNTAIN HILLS BLVDMcDOWELL MO
U
N
T
A
I
N
R
D
FOUNTAIN HILLS BLVDSUNRIDGE DREL
L
A
G
O
B
L
V
D
AVENU
E
O
F
T
H
E
FOUNT
A
I
N
S
PANORAMA DRFIREROCK
COUNTRYCLUB DREAG
L
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
PKW
YCRESTVIEW DRPALO
M
I
N
O
B
L
V
D
SIERRA M
A
D
R
E
GRANDE BLV
D
G
O
L
D
E
N
E
A
G
L
E
B
L
V
D
E
AG
L
E
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
E
A
G
L
E
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
VICINITY MAP
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
NORTH
SCALE: 1" = 3500'All that i s A r i z o naFOU N T A IN H
I
L
LSTOWN OFINC. 1989TOWN HALL
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SCOTTSDALE
McDOWELL MOUNTAIN PARK
FORT McDOWELL YAVAPAI NATIONSALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
TOWN BOUNDARY
SCOTTSDALE
13010 N
MIMOSA DR
EA: 2021-16
EXHIBIT "A"TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLSEASEMENT ABANDONMENTLOT 30
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Ari
zon
a
F
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989ZONING: R1-10JERICHO DRLOT 30LEGEND:LOT 31MIMOSA DR
PHOTO MAP2020 AERIAL1780ABANDON10'X120.9'P.U.E. & D.E.TRACT B17701778177617741772EA 2021-16
RESOLUTION 2021-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN
HILLS, ARIZONA, ABANDONING WHATEVER RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT
HAS IN THE PRE-INCORPORATED 10’ PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE
EASEMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PLAT 602B BLOCK 2,
LOT 30 (13010 N MIMOSA DRIVE) FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AS RECORDED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, RECORDED IN BOOK 166 OF MAPS, PAGE 32
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”), as the governing body
of real property located in the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town”), may require the dedication of public streets,
sewer, water, drainage, and other utility easements or rights-of-way within any proposed subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has the authority to accept or reject offers of dedication of private property by
easement, deed, subdivision, plat or other lawful means; and
WHEREAS, all present utility companies have received notification of the proposed abandonment.
ENACTMENTS:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN
HILLS, as follows:
SECTION 1. That the certain public utility and drainage easement, located along the north property line of
Plat 602B Block 2, Lot 30, (13010 N Mimosa Drive) Fountain Hills, as recorded the Office of the County
Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Book 166 of Maps, Page 32, and as more particularly described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby declared to be abandoned by the
Town. Certain lots within this subdivision are subject to lot-to-lot drainage runoff. The property owner is
required to pass the developed flows generated by the upstream lots across their property.
SECTION 2. That this Resolution is one of abandonment and disclaimer by the Town solely for the
purpose of removing any potential cloud on the title to said property and that the Town in no way attempts to
affect the rights of any private party to oppose the abandonment or assert any right resulting there from or
existing previous to any action by the Town.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, this 2nd day of
November, 2021.
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO:
Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney
ITEM 7. E.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Consent Submitting Department: Development Services
Prepared by: Farhad Tavassoli, Senior Planner
Staff Contact Information: Farhad Tavassoli, Senior Planner
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language): CONSIDERATION AND
POSSIBLE ACTION: Final Plat for Adero Canyon Phase II Parcel 4, a subdivision containing 33 lots and 8
tracts in the Adero Canyon PAD.
Staff Summary (Background)
The Adero Canyon Phase II Planned Area Development (PAD) and the associated Preliminary Master
Plat was approved by the Town Council February 6, 2018. This PAD included Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and
10 of the original Adero Canyon PAD. The developer, Toll Brothers, has previously received approval for
final plats for Parcel 2 (Parcels 2A and 2B), Parcel 3, and for Parcels 5 and 6.
This request is for final plat approval for Parcel 4. The lots in this subdivision have access to Eagle Ridge
Drive via Sonora Crest. The preliminary master plat for Parcel 4 included contained 34 lots; one more
than is proposed by this final plat.
The layout for Parcel 4 has changed slightly from the preliminary plat. The changes have been made to
reduce the amount of cut and fill needed. The applicant has processed an administrative modification
to the PAD to address these changes. The final plats for Parcels 2A, 2B, 3, and 4 crossed the boundaries
of the original parcel lines. The preliminary plat for this combined area had 143 lots. The combined
final plats have 125 lots.
Staff has reviewed and approved the associated improvement plans for this final plat. This plat will be
signed and recorded following Town Council approval.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
Adero Canyon Phase II PAD
Subdivision Ordinance
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat for Adero Canyon Phase II Parcel 4.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to the Final Plat for Adero Canyon Phase II Parcel 4.
Attachments
Final Plat
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Development Services Director John Wesley 10/20/2021 04:32 PM
Form Started By: Farhad Tavassoli Started On: 10/20/2021 07:36 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/20/2021
Project:Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
Drawn by:
Reviewed by:w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o mT:480.503.2250 F:480.835.17991130 N. Alma School Rd, Suite 120|Mesa, AZ 85201ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4FOUNTAIN HILLS, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAA.G.
R.M.
18-594
of 6
FP01 FINAL PLAT 1
FOR
VICINITY MAP
A RE-PLAT OF PARCEL 4 OF "ADERO CANYON"
RECORDED IN BOOK 1220 OF MAPS, PAGE 28 OF MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS
LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, FOUNTAIN HILLS,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
DEDICATION FINAL PLAT
SHEET 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
"ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4"
ASSURED WATER SUPPLY
TOWN APPROVAL
APPROVAL
EPCOR RATIFICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
NOTES:
BASIS OF BEARING
ASSURANCE STATEMENT
SITE
SHEET INDEX
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
REGISTERE D L A ND S
U
R
V
EYORCERTIF I C ATE
N
O.53160
RAYMOND S.
MUNOZ III Da
te Signed 1 0 /14/2021ARIZONA , U .S .A.KEY MAP
SHEET 3
409
435
434
437
436
405
Tract F
410 411 412
413
416
415
414
417
419
418
420
Tract G
Tract H
431
432
433
430
Tract B
406
407
Tract C
408
Tract D
Tract A
Tract E
Tract E
Tract E
Tract E
Tract A
Tract
A
Tract
A
Tract A
Tract B
Tract E
SONORA CREST
Tract G
Tract H
60 0 60 120
scale feet Project:Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
Drawn by:
Reviewed by:w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o mT:480.503.2250 F:480.835.17991130 N. Alma School Rd, Suite 120|Mesa, AZ 85201ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4FOUNTAIN HILLS, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAA.G.
R.M.
18-594
of 6
FP02 FINAL PLAT 2REGISTERED L A ND S
U
R
V
EYORCERTIF I C ATE
N
O.53160
RAYMOND S.
MUNOZ III Da
te Signed 1 0 /14/2021ARIZONA , U .S .A.DETAIL 'A'
SETBACK NOTE:MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 3 OF 6LEGEND
401
402
403
404
417
419
418
420
422
421
423
424
431
432
433
430
429
428
427 426
425
Tract E
Tract E
Tract A
Tract ATract
A
Tract
A
Tract A
Tract B
Tract B
Tract E
Tract E
SON
O
R
A
C
R
E
S
T
CA
N
Y
O
N
V
I
E
W
L
A
N
E
EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE60 0 60 120
scale feet Project:Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
Drawn by:
Reviewed by:w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o mT:480.503.2250 F:480.835.17991130 N. Alma School Rd, Suite 120|Mesa, AZ 85201ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4FOUNTAIN HILLS, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAA.G.
R.M.
18-594
of 6
FP03 FINAL PLAT 3REGISTERED L A ND S
U
R
V
EYORCERTIF I C ATE
N
O.53160
RAYMOND S.
MUNOZ III Da
te Signed 1 0 /14/2021ARIZONA , U .S .A.EAGLE RIDGE DRIVES
O
N
O
R
A
C
R
E
S
T
SETBACK NOTE:
DETAIL 'B'MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 6LEGEND
409
435
434
437
436
405
Tract F
410 411 412
413
416
415
414
417
419
418
420
Tract G
Tract H
431
432
433
430
Tract B
406
407
Tract C
408
Tract D
Tract A
Tract E
Tract E
Tract E
Tract E
Tract A
Tract
A
Tract
A
Tract A
Tract B
Tract E
SONORA CREST
60 0 60 120
scale feet Project:Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
Drawn by:
Reviewed by:w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o mT:480.503.2250 F:480.835.17991130 N. Alma School Rd, Suite 120|Mesa, AZ 85201ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4FOUNTAIN HILLS, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAA.G.
R.M.
18-594
of 6
FP04 FINAL PLAT 4REGISTERED L A ND S
U
R
V
EYORCERTIF I C ATE
N
O.53160
RAYMOND S.
MUNOZ III Da
te Signed 1 0 /14/2021ARIZONA , U .S .A.SETBACK NOTE:MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 5 OF 6LEGEND
401
402
403
404
417
419
418
420
422
421
423
424
431
432
433
430
429
428
427 426
425
Tract E
Tract E
Tract A
Tract ATract
A
Tract
A
Tract A
Tract B
Tract B
Tract E
Tract E
SON
O
R
A
C
R
E
S
T
CA
N
Y
O
N
V
I
E
W
L
A
N
E
EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE60 0 60 120
scale feet Project:Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
Drawn by:
Reviewed by:w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o mT:480.503.2250 F:480.835.17991130 N. Alma School Rd, Suite 120|Mesa, AZ 85201ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4FOUNTAIN HILLS, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAA.G.
R.M.
18-594
of 6
FP05 FINAL PLAT 5REGISTERED L A ND S
U
R
V
EYORCERTIF I C ATE
N
O.53160
RAYMOND S.
MUNOZ III Da
te Signed 1 0 /14/2021ARIZONA , U .S .A.SETBACK NOTE:
LEGEND
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 4 OF 6
LOT AREA TABLE LOT AREA TABLE LOT AREA TABLE TRACT USE TABLELINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE
CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE
Project:Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
Drawn by:
Reviewed by:w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o mT:480.503.2250 F:480.835.17991130 N. Alma School Rd, Suite 120|Mesa, AZ 85201ADERO CANYON PARCEL 4FOUNTAIN HILLS, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAA.G.
R.M.
18-594
of 6
FP06 FINAL PLAT 6REGISTERED L A ND S
U
R
V
EYORCERTIF I C ATE
N
O.53160
RAYMOND S.
MUNOZ III Da
te Signed 1 0 /14/2021ARIZONA , U .S .A.
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
N/A
Staff Recommendation(s)
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No.2 to Professional Services Agreement 2021-005 with
A&H Painting, INC.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE to approve Amendment No.2 to Professional Services Agreement 2021-005 with A&H Painting,
INC. in the amount of $23,730 and approve any necessary budget transfers.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact:$23,730
Budget Reference:33
Funding Source:Facilities Replacement Fund
If Multiple Funds utilized, list here:N/A
Budgeted: if No, attach Budget Adjustment Form:
Attachments
Change orders
Professional Services Agreement
Budget Transfer
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Public Works Director (Originator)Justin Weldy 10/21/2021 04:12 PM
Finance Director David Pock 10/21/2021 05:35 PM
Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 10/22/2021 10:07 AM
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/22/2021 02:28 PM
Form Started By: Justin Weldy Started On: 10/19/2021 04:42 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2021
ESTIMATE
Date
7/23/2021
Estimate No.
072321-02
Name/Address
Town of Fountain Hills
16705 East Avenue of the Fountains
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
Ship To
Community Center
Interior Painting
A&H Painting, Inc.
PO BOX 10126
GLENDALE, AZ 85318
Ph: 602-439-1484 Fax 602-896-3057
www.aandhpainting.com
Terms
Net 30
Project Name / #
Drywall Rep
Contract #
TBC
Send Purchase order to:glenda@aandhpainting.com or fax (602)896-3057 Total
Subtotal
Sales Tax (0.0%)
Item Description Qty Rate Total
DRYWALL REPAIRS
SCOPE OF WORK:
Replace crooked drywall panels where surface is uneven - as needed, cut, retape, patch
and retexture to match existing as close as possible the joint tape lines currently visible.
AREAS INCLUDED: Areas next to doors where signs were removed, hallways walls
showing drywall joint tape lines, walls showing uneven surfaces (crooked panels)
COST:
Materials Materials 1 1,980.00 1,980.00
Labor Labor to complete this project 1 7,550.00 7,550.00
Thank you for the opportunity!!
$9,530.00
$9,530.00
$0.00
ESTIMATE
Date
9/21/2021
Estimate No.
092121-01
Name/Address
Town of Fountain Hills
16705 East Avenue of the Fountains
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268
Ship To
SEE DETAIL
A&H Painting, Inc.
PO BOX 10126
GLENDALE, AZ 85318
Ph: 602-439-1484 Fax 602-896-3057
www.aandhpainting.com
Terms
Net 30
Project Name / #
Cumminity
Contract #
TBC
Send Purchase order to:glenda@aandhpainting.com or fax (602)896-3057 Total
Subtotal
Sales Tax (0.0%)
Item Description Qty Rate Total
ADDITIONAL WORK AT COMMUNITY CENTER
Interior Painting WALL REPAIRS AT LOBBY AREA 1 7,700.00 7,700.00
SCOPE:
- Install thick plastic on entire Lobby floors to protect sealer recently applied
- Cut around and replace damaged drywall, patch all damaged drywall, apply 1 coat of
primer and 2 coats of paint.
** We need 3 days to complete this work.
Interior Painting ADDITIONAL PAINTING: Lobby reception half wall to be painted in brown and trade
damages touch ups in several areas
1 950.00 950.00
Thank you for the opportunity!!
$8,650.00
$8,650.00
$0.00
1
Contract No. C2021-005.2
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
AND
A & H PAINTING, INC.
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (this
“Second Amendment”) is entered into upon execution, between the Town of Fountain Hills, an
Arizona municipal corporation (the “Town”) and A & H Painting, Inc., a(n) Arizona corporation
(the “Consultant”).
RECITALS
A. The Town and the Consultant entered into a Professional Services Agreement (the
“Agreement”), dated August 24, 2020 for the Consultant to provide painting
services (the “Services”).
B. The Town and the Consultant amended the Agreement via Amendment No. 1,
(“First Amendment”) dated May 4, 2021, to (i) extend the term of the Agreement,
(ii) provide for compensation, and (iii) edit the scope. All capitalized terms not
otherwise defined in this Second Amendment have the same meanings as contained
in the Agreement.
C. The Town and the Consultant desire to enter this Second Amendment to amend the
Agreement to provide for compensation to the Consultant for the Services.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing introduction and recitals, which
are incorporated herein by reference, the following mutual covenants and conditions, and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Town and the Consultant hereby agree as follows:
1. Compensation. The Town shall pay Consultant an amount not to exceed $23,730
for the Services, resulting in an increase of the cumulative contract amount from $134,340 to
$158,070.
2. Effect of Amendment. In all other respects, the Agreement is affirmed and ratified
and, except as expressly modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.
2
3. Non-Default. By executing this Second Amendment, the Consultant affirmatively
asserts that (i) the Town is not currently in default, nor has it been in default at any time prior to
this Second Amendment, under any of the terms or conditions of the Agreement and (ii) any and
all claims, known and unknown, relating to the Agreement and existing on or before the date of
this Second Amendment are forever waived.
5. Conflict of Interest. This Second Amendment t and the Agreement may be
cancelled by the Town pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-511.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
10/21/2021 17:32 |TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS |P 1
DPock |BUDGET AMENDMENTS JOURNAL ENTRY PROOF |bgamdent
LN ORG OBJECT PROJ ORG DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION PREV BUDGET AMENDED
ACCOUNT LINE DESCRIPTION EFF DATE BUDGET CHANGE BUDGET ERR____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
YEAR-PER JOURNAL EFF-DATE REF 1 REF 2 SRC JNL-DESC ENTITY AMEND
2022 05 2 11/02/2021 BUA CC PAINT 1 8
1 FRAD 6280 FACILITIES REPLACEMENT ADMIN PAINTING 80,000.00 23,730.00 103,730.00
610-40-30-303-000-0106-6280- FR GENAD 11/02/2021
2 GENAD 7010 GENERAL GOVERNMENT ADMIN CONTINGENCY 5,359,143.00 -23,730.00 5,335,413.00
100-10-15-110-100-0106-7010- TO FRAD 11/02/2021
** JOURNAL TOTAL 0.00 Z
ITEM 8. A.
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: 11/02/2021 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting
Agenda Type: Regular Agenda Submitting Department: Development Services
Prepared by: John Wesley, Development Services Director
Staff Contact Information: John Wesley, Development Services Director
Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language): PUBLIC HEARING,
CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Ordinance 21-13 amending Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6,
Sign Regulations, Sections 6.02, Definitions, Section 6.07, General Regulations, and Section 6.08, Sign
Requirements and Allowances.
Staff Summary (Background)
Following several work sessions in early 2021, the Council approved the new Sign Regulations (Chapter
6 of the Zoning Ordinance) on May 18, 2021. During the review by the Council there was significant
discussion regarding allowing temporary signs, specifically A-frame, T-frame, post and board, yard, and
residential directional signs, in the public right-of-way. In the final version of the ordinance, the Council
voted to not allow these types of signs in the right-of-way. In follow-up to that vote, however, the
Council acknowledged this as an issue that should have further review and directed staff to explore
options to address concerns raised by Councilmembers and the pulbic and propose possible
amendments.
To address the situation, staff has:
Explored and listed the actual differences in the previous and new ordinance to see clearly what
has changed.
Further reviewed the commercial and industrial areas in the Town to see where there may be
challenges for businesses to place temporary signage on private property (maps attached)
Met twice with two separate focus groups (one business and one real estate) to seek input
regarding the challenges presented by the new ordinance and discussion regarding possible
amendments.
The action of the Town Council to not allow temporary signs in the right-of-way was an effort to provide
a sign ordinance that is consistent with the Findings and Purpose statements in Section 6.01 of the Sign
Regulations. Several of these statements mention the need to protect the health and safety of the
Town by reducing distractions and obstructions along roadways and avoiding visual clutter while still
providing a means of communication in the Town. In considering possible amendments, staff kept in
mind the intent of the ordinance and the initial decision from the Council to not allow these signs in the
right-of-way, and has sought the minimum modifications that could be considered to address the
concerns expressed while still maintaining the safety and aesthetics of the community.
Following are the possible changes staff has identified to the Sign Regulations in an effort to balance
these competing interests. Included with each section are comments and alternative recommendations
from the Planning and Zoning Commission, if any.
Section 6.02
One of the concerns with regard to the ordinance is for businesses in zero setback situations where the
building is brought to the property line along the street. In those situations, there is nowhere to put a
temporary sign except in the right-of-way. This condition occurs primarily in the Town Center area
where we have the Town Center Commercial District and the Planned Shopping Plaza Overlay District.
This area was designed to be a primarily pedestrian-oriented commercial area. In these types of
locations, communities tend to have more pedestrian activity and vehicle speeds are typically lower.
A-frame and T-frame signage is often considered appropriate and a part of the urban fabric of these
locations.
As shown by the mapping that has been done of the Town, most of the commercial areas throughout
the town have room between any parking lots and buildings and the front property line. This is because
of the setback requirements in the zoning ordinance. While there are some exceptions in the older
parts of town, they are limited.
In order to allow A-frame and T-frame signs in the Town Center area where it is appropriate, while still
limiting the use of the right-of-way in other areas, staff is proposing an amendment to Section 6.02,
Definitions, to define a Town Center Pedestrian Area. The proposed wording for this amendment is:
TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA: THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA IS DESIGNATED AS SHOWN
IN THE FIGURE BELOW.
This defined area will be referenced in a modification to Section 6.08 A. 1. d. to allow A-frame and
T-frame signs in the right-of-way in this area.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of this section as presented.
Section 6.07
Through the discussion following Council approval of the new ordinance, it was noted that the total
prohibition on signs in the right-of-way would impact directional signage that has previously been
approved and used in association with large town events.
Section 6.07 of the Sign Regulations addresses a variety of general topics associated with the location
and maintenance of signs. Section 6.07 B. gives general regulations on allowed sign locations and lists
prohibited locations for signs. To address this topic, staff is proposing the following amendment to
Section 6.07 B. 2. Prohibited Locations:
a. Within, on, or projecting over the right-of-way, including within center medians, unless
specifically provided for in this Sign Ordinance, OR AS ALLOWED THROUGH TOWN APPROVAL OF
A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT.
To avoid confusion whether signs would be allowed in side medians versus center medians, staff is also
recommending the word "center" be removed in this section so it is clear it applies to all medians.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approvla of this section as presented.
Section 6.08 A. 1. d.
Section 6.08 provides all the specific regulations for each sigh type. Subsection A. 1. addresses A-frame
and T-frame signs, and d. provides the specific regulations related to location. The proposed
amendment to this section are as follows:
d. Location. Shall not be used as an off-premiseSITE sign, except when used as a residential
directional sign or as provided below:
i. On property held in common by members of a property owners association OR
ii. OOn property owned by the business owner’s landlord, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY
DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
ii. AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D.
III. Along a public street subject to:WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA,
MAY BE LOCATED IN THE TOWN RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE BUSINESS PROVIDED:
1. Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or sidewalk, or
in any median ;
2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area;
3. Shall not be located in a manner that poses a traffic vision hazard.; AND,
4. SHALL not BE located within a public right-of-wayAT LEAST THREE (3) FEET
FROM ANY CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
This amendment will allow these signs in the right-of-way in the defined Town Center Pedestrian Area
and as allowed in Section 6.08 D. for residential directional. This addresses most of the concerns
expressed in the focus groups.
As part of the discussion of this topic, it has been pointed out that another sign type available is a
Projecting sign, a permanent sign which projects out from and perpendicular to a building face. These
can be more visible to the traveling public when the building is close to the street. The ordinance
currently allows this sign type and requires approval of an encroachment permit should the sign
overhang a public right-of-way. A suggestion was made that the Town process and approve a blanket
encroachment permit for the Town Center Pedestrian Area that would allow an individual
property/business owner to receive approval of such a sign, subject to meeting the code requirements,
without having to individually apply for the encroachment permit.
There was concern expressed in the focus groups regarding not allowing these signs on a public
sidewalk. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed this topic. They recognized an issue,
particularly along Avenue of the Fountains, where it will often not be possible to use these signs
because the entire area from the building to the curb is a sidewalk. The Commission's vote to
recommend approval of the text changes included an amendment to this section to allow signs on the
sidewalk. This change can be accomplished by modifying the list above to read as follows:
1. Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or sidewalk, or in any median ;
2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area;
3. Shall not be located in a manner that poses a traffic vision hazard;
4. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON A PUBLIC SIDEWALK UNLESS THERE IS AT LEAST 6’ OF CLEAR
PASSAGE AROUND AT LEAST ONE SIDE AND THE SIGN OWNER PROVIDES THE TOWN AN
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WITH REGARDS TO THE SIGN; AND,
5. SHALL not BE located within a public right-of-wayAT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM ANY
CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
Section 6.08 A. 12. d.
This section of the ordinance provides the standards for Post and Board signs. This sign type is allowed
in all zoning districts and, historically, has been used primarily to advertise properties "For Sale" and
"For Lease". The previous ordinance did not allow them in the right-of-way but, due the constraints on
some properties, had historically been allowed. Unlike A-frame signs that are easily moved, they can
become semi-permanent and are not moved on a daily basis. Therefore, if one is improperly located
there is time to work with a property owner to adjust a location. Further, there is some concern with
locating these signs in the right-of-way due to buried utilities.
The proposed modification to the ordinance would continue to require the signs to be place on the
private property, but allows approval of exceptions by the Town Engineer through an encroachment
permit in two situations: in commercial and industrial areas where the building placement does not
allow room for one on-site and in cases where the sign would not be visible from the street due to the
topography. The specific suggested code language is:
d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way.
I. SHALL NOT BE USED AS AN OFF-SITE SIGN, EXCEPT ON PROPERTY HELD IN
COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY
OWNED BY THE BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED
PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. HOWEVER, IN
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE BUILDINGS ARE BUILT TO THE
PROPERTY LINE OR IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT WHERE TOPOGRAPHY LIMITS VISIBILITY
BEHIND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT MAY BE REQUESTED TO
ALLOW SIGN PLACEMENT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ALL PORTIONS OF THE
SIGN STRUCTURE AND SIGN FACE ARE AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR
EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND DO NOT OVERHANG A SIDEWALK.
Note that there is one additional change being provided to this section. Similar to the A-frame signs,
these signs could be placed in locations which are not at the business location, but should not be
considered to be off-site signs. An example would be an office condominium complex that needed to
advertise one of the units be available for sale or lease. The post and board sign would likely not be
placed on the individual unit location but at another location within the condominium where it would be
visible from the street. The ordinance as adopted did not specifically cover this type of placement like it
does for the A-frame signs. The first added section in the revision addresses this issue.
The Planning and Zoning Commission had some discussion regarding this section and questioned why
these types of signs could not be allowed in the right of way. Consideration was given to the fact there
are relative few of these signs, they are usually installed by companies that are from out of town and
will not be familiar with our ordinances or where a property line is, the traditional nature of these types
of signs being placed close the street for visibility, and the hazard that can come from having someone
trying to read such a small sign if placed far from the street. The Commission's vote to recommend
approval of the text changes included an amendment to this section to change the wording in II to allow
signs on the public right of way in all situations. The Commission's recommended language is:
ii. MAY BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ALL PORTIONS OF THE SIGN
STRUCTURE AND SIGN FACE ARE AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF ANY
STREET OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT AND DO NOT OVERHANG A SIDEWALK.
Section 6.08 A. 17. d.
This section of the ordinance provides standards for Yard signs. This sign type is allowed in all zoning
districts and, historically, has been used primarily to advertise open houses and yard sales, but has also
been used as a contractor signs. This sign type has, historically, not been used as much as A-frames for
advertising businesses.
The second portion of this ordinance modification leaves in place the provision these signs are not
permitted in the right-of-way, except when used as a Residential Directional Sign. This then refers to
Section 6.08 D. which provides the standards for this sign type. The specific suggested code language is:
d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way.
I. ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY OWNER’S
ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BUSINESS OWNERS LANDLORD, BUT
NOT WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, EXCEPT WHEN USED
AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D.
Note that there is one additional change being provided to this section. Similar to the A-frame signs,
these signs could be placed in locations which are not at the business location, but should not be
considered to be off-site signs. An example would be a dwelling unit in a condominium complex that
needed to advertise one of the units be available for sale or lease. The yard sign used for an open
house would likely not be placed on the individual unit location but at another location within the
condominium where it would be visible from the street or parking area. The ordinance as adopted did
not specifically cover this type of placement like it does for the A-frame signs. The first added section in
the revision addresses this issue.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this modification as presented.
Section 6.08 D.
This section of the ordinance provides standards for Residential Directional signs. This sign type is
allowed in residential zoning districts and along streets leading to the activity advertised on the sign.
Most often these signs are used to advertise open houses and garage sales, but could be used for any
type of activity occurring in a residential neighborhood. Item 1 under this section provides the zoning
districts where the sign type is allowed and Item 2 provides the number (1 on the property and up to 5
providing direction). Item 3 states the signs cannot be placed in the right-of-way.
Council has had a lot of concern about this sign type given the frequent abuse of the regulations in the
past regarding placement and, given the Reed decision, that lack of ability to regulate the message on
signs. Given the typical purpose for which this sign type is used (open house and garage sales) it would
be a challenge to expect individuals to approach homeowners about placing a sign on their property and
a possible annoyance to the homeowners to be regularly approached about having signs on their
property. It is also often a challenge to know where the right-of-way line is on a specific property which
creates a problem for both the person placing a sign and for code enforcement staff.
The proposed amendment seeks to find a compromise position that allows for the placement of this
sign type in the right-of-way to serve their primary intended use while still maintaining some limitation
to meet the purpose of the ordinance. The specific suggested code language is:
3. Shall not be located within the public right-of-way ASSOCIATED WITH SHEA BOULEVARD
AT ANY TIME, BUT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OF ANY OTHER STREET
BETWEEN THE HOURS OF OFFICIAL SUNRISE AND OFFICIAL SUNSET ON FRIDAYS, SATURDAYS,
AND SUNDAYS. WHEN LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE PLACED AT LEAST THREE (3)
FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
With this language, on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday's Residential Directional signs could be place in the
right-of-way on any street, except Shea Boulevard, between official sunrise and official sunset each day.
Any other day of the week these signs would need to be on private property.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this modification as presented.
Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle
Zoning Ordinance Chapter 6, Sign Regulations
Risk Analysis
N/A
Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s)
The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed possible modifications at their regular meeting on
August 9 and then considered the specific options for ordinance amendment at a public hearing held on
September 13. There were no citizens present to speak at the September 13 hearing. Following
discussion of each item, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approve of the text
amendments with the modifications as outlined above.
A version of the ordinance as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission is attached.
Staff Recommendation(s)
Two ordinances are attached for Council consideration. One is the ordinance as recommended by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. The other is the ordinance as it was drafted and presented to the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Based upon staff understanding of the competing interests involved in this section of the sign
ordinance, the staff ordinance presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission represents changes
that could be made which maintain, to a significant degree, the desires and goals of the Council while
allowing some increased flexibility in the use and location for temporary signage.
Staff can support any or all of the changes contained in either of the attached ordinance.
SUGGESTED MOTION
MOVE TO adopt Ordinance 21-13. (The Council will need to specify which [P&Z Commission
recommendation or staff draft ordinance] ordinance is being adopted.
Attachments
Ord 21-13 Commission Rec.
Ord 21-13 Staff Rec.
Areas for Temp Signs
Map
Comparison
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Development Services Director (Originator)John Wesley 10/05/2021 09:56 AM
Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 10/05/2021 11:42 AM
Town Manager Grady E. Miller 10/12/2021 08:25 PM
Development Services Director (Originator)John Wesley 10/13/2021 07:51 AM
Form Started By: John Wesley Started On: 09/16/2021 07:54 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/21/2021
ORDINANCE NO. 21-13 (Commission Recommended)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 6, SIGN REGULATIONS, SECTION 6.02,
DEFINITIONS, ADDING A DEFINITION OF TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN
AREA, SECTION 6.07 B. 2. a, ADDING AN EXCEPTION FOR SIGNAGE FOR
TOWN APPROVED SPECIAL EVENTS, AND SECTIONS 6.08 A. 1, 12, 17, AND
6.08 D. 3 AMENDING REGULATIONS RELATED TO A-FRAME AND T-FRAME,
POST AND BOARD, YARD, AND RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”) adopted
Ordinance No. 93-22 on November 18, 1993, which adopted the Zoning Ordinance for the Town
of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and
WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to amend Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.02,
Definitions, adding a definition of town center pedestrian area, Section 6.07 B. 2. a., adding an
exception for signage for town approved special events, and Sections 6.08 A. 1, 12, 17, and 6.08
D. 3. amending regulations related to a-frame and t-frame, post and board, yard, and residential
directional signs; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-
462.04, public hearings regarding this ordinance were advertised in the August 25 and September
1, 2021 editions of the Fountain Hills Times; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on
September 13, 2021, and by the Town Council on October 19, 2021, and November 2, 2021.
ENACTMENTS:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows:
SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.02, Definitions, is
hereby amended to add the following definition:
TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA: THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA IS
DESIGNATED AS SHOWN IN THE FIGURE BELOW.
ORDINANCE 21-13 (Commission Rec.) Page 2
SECTION 3. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.07B.2.a. is hereby
amended as follows:
a. Within, on, or projecting over the right-of-way, including within center medians,
unless specifically provided for in this Sign Ordinance, OR AS ALLOWED
THROUGH TOWN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT.
SECTION 4. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08A.1.d. is hereby
amended as follows:
d. Location. Shall not be used as an off-premiseSITE sign, except when used as a
residential directional sign or as provided below:
i. On property held in common by members of a property owners association
OR
ii. OOn property owned by the business owner’s landlord, BUT NOT WITHIN
ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
ii. AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION
6.08 D.
ORDINANCE 21-13 (Commission Rec.) Page 3
III. Along a public street subject to:WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER
PEDESTRIAN AREA, MAY BE LOCATED IN THE TOWN RIGHT-OF-
WAY ADJACENT TO THE BUSINESS PROVIDED:
1. Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or
sidewalk, or in any median;
2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area;
3. Shall not be located in a manner that poses a traffic vision hazard.;
4. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON A PUBLIC SIDEWALK UNLESS
THERE IS AT LEAST 6’ OF CLEAR PASSAGE AROUND AT
LEAST ONE SIDE AND THE SIGN OWNER PROVIDES THE
TOWN AN INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WITH REGARDS
TO THE SIGN; AND,
5. SHALL not BE located within a public right-of-wayAT LEAST
THREE (3) FEET FROM ANY CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
SECTION 5. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08A.12.d. is hereby
amended as follows:
d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way.
I. SHALL NOT BE USED AS AN OFF-SITE SIGN, EXCEPT ON
PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY
DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
II. MAY BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED ALL
PORTIONS OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE AND SIGN FACE ARE AT
LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF ANY STREET
OR DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT AND DO NOT OVERHANG A SIDEWALK.
SECTION 6. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08A.17.d. is hereby
amended as follows:
d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way.
I. ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY
DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
EXCEPT WHEN USED AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS
PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D.
SECTION 7. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08D.3. is hereby
amended as follows:
3. Shall not be located within the public right -of-way ASSOCIATED WITH SHEA
BOULEVARD AT ANY TIME, BUT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY OTHER STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF
OFFICIAL SUNRISE AND OFFICIAL SUNSET ON FRIDAYS, SATURDAYS,
AND SUNDAYS. WHEN LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE
ORDINANCE 21-13 (Commission Rec.) Page 4
PLACED AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF
PAVEMENT.
SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 9. In accordance with Article II, Sections 1 and 2, Constitution of Arizona, and the laws
of the State of Arizona, the City/Town Council has considered the individual property rights and
personal liberties of the residents of the City/Town and the probable impact of the proposed
ordinance on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent before adopting this ordinance
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona , this
2nd day of November, 2021.
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO:
Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney
ORDINANCE NO. 21-13 (Staff Recommended)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 6, SIGN REGULATIONS, SECTION 6.02,
DEFINITIONS, ADDING A DEFINITION OF TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN
AREA, SECTION 6.07 B. 2. a, ADDING AN EXCEPTION FOR SIGNAGE FOR
TOWN APPROVED SPECIAL EVENTS, AND SECTIONS 6.08 A. 1, 12, 17, AND
6.08 D. 3 AMENDING REGULATIONS RELATED TO A-FRAME AND T-FRAME,
POST AND BOARD, YARD, AND RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”) adopted
Ordinance No. 93-22 on November 18, 1993, which adopted the Zoning Ordinance for the Town
of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and
WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to amend Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.02,
Definitions, adding a definition of town center pedestrian area, Section 6.07 B. 2. a., adding an
exception for signage for town approved special events, and Sections 6.08 A.1, 12, 17, and
6.08D.3. amending regulations related to a-frame and t-frame, post and board, yard, and
residential directional signs; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-
462.04, public hearings regarding this ordinance were advertised in the August 25 and September
1, 2021 editions of the Fountain Hills Times; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on
September 13, 2021, and by the Town Council on October 19, 2021, and November 2, 2021..
ENACTMENTS:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows:
SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.02, Definitions, is
hereby amended to add the following definition:
TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA: THE TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA IS
DESIGNATED AS SHOWN IN THE FIGURE BELOW.
ORDINANCE 21-13 (Staff Rec.) Page 2
SECTION 3. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.07B.2.a. is hereby
amended as follows:
a. Within, on, or projecting over the right-of-way, including within center medians,
unless specifically provided for in this Sign Ordinance, OR AS ALLOWED
THROUGH TOWN APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT.
SECTION 4. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08A.1.d. is hereby
amended as follows:
d. Location. Shall not be used as an off-premiseSITE sign, except when used as a
residential directional sign or as provided below:
i. On property held in common by members of a property owners association
OR
ii. OOn property owned by the business owner’s landlord, BUT NOT WITHIN
ANY DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
ii. AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS PROVIDED IN SECTION
6.08 D.
ORDINANCE 21-13 (Staff Rec.) Page 3
III. Along a public street subject to:WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER
PEDESTRIAN AREA, MAY BE LOCATED IN THE TOWN RIGHT-OF-
WAY ADJACENT TO THE BUSINESS PROVIDED:
1. Shall not be located on the paved portion of any public street or
sidewalk, or in any median;
2. Shall not be located within a designated parking or loading area;
3. Shall not be located in a manner that poses a traffic vision hazard.;
AND,
4. SHALL not BE located within a public right-of-wayAT LEAST
THREE (3) FEET FROM ANY CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
SECTION 5. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08A.12.d. is hereby
amended as follows:
d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way.
I. SHALL NOT BE USED AS AN OFF-SITE SIGN, EXCEPT ON
PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY
DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF WAY.
HOWEVER, IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
WHERE BUILDINGS ARE BUILT TO THE PROPERTY LINE OR IN ANY
ZONING DISTRICT WHERE TOPOGRAPHY LIMITS VISIBILITY
BEHIND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT MAY BE
REQUESTED TO ALLOW SIGN PLACEMENT WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY PROVIDED ALL PORTIONS OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE AND
SIGN FACE ARE AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR
EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND DO NOT OVERHANG A SIDEWALK.
SECTION 6. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08A.17.d. is hereby
amended as follows:
d. Location: Shall not be located within the public right-of-way.
I. ON PROPERTY HELD IN COMMON BY MEMBERS OF A PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
BUSINESS OWNER’S LANDLORD, BUT NOT WITHIN ANY
DESIGNATED PARKING OR LOADING AREA.
II. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
EXCEPT WHEN USED AS A RESIDENTIAL DIRECTIONAL SIGN AS
PROVIDED IN SECTION 6.08 D.
SECTION 7. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sign Regulations, Section 6.08D.3. is hereby
amended as follows:
3. Shall not be located within the public right -of-way ASSOCIATED WITH SHEA
BOULEVARD AT ANY TIME, BUT MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ANY OTHER STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF
OFFICIAL SUNRISE AND OFFICIAL SUNSET ON FRIDAYS, SATURDAYS,
AND SUNDAYS. WHEN LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, SHALL BE
ORDINANCE 21-13 (Staff Rec.) Page 4
PLACED AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET FROM THE CURB OR EDGE OF
PAVEMENT.
SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 9. In accordance with Article II, Sections 1 and 2, Constitution of Arizona, and the laws
of the State of Arizona, the City/Town Council has considered the individual property rights and
personal liberties of the residents of the City/Town and the probable impact of the proposed
ordinance on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent before adopting this ordinance
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this
2nd day of November, 2021.
FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO:
Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk
REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney
Southwest corner of Palisades and La Montana
Right of Way line
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Right of Way Line
Distance between Right of Way
and parking area approximately
4’.Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Right of Way Line
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Right of Way Line
Very little room for temporary sign.
Could consider permanent projecting sign or
additional wall signage.
Right of Way Line
Very little room for temporary sign.
Could consider permanent projecting sign.
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Southeast corner of Glenbrook and Fountain Hills Blvd
Area where A-frame, Post and
Board, and Yard signs are
permitted
Approximately 4’
Northeast corner of El Pueblo and Fountain Hills Blvd.
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Saguaro Blvd. from Bond to Rand
Area where Post and Board and Yard
signs are permitted
A-frames only for Residential Directional
Sign
Area where A-frame, Post and Board,
and Yard signs are permitted
Approximately 8’ between
parking and right of way
TOWN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AREA
A
ll that is A r i z o n aFOU N T A IN HI
L
LSTOWN OFINC. 1989VERDE RIVER DRPARKVIEW AVE
LA MONTANA DRSAGUARO BLVDPALISADES BLVD
AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS
Pedestrian Area
* New (current) ordinance provisions approved by Council in May; based on no temporary signs in the right of way.
** These are the proposed modifications as recommended by staff and P&Z. Highlighted blank boxes mean no modifications have been
proposed for those provisions. Additional modifications may be proposed by the Council to address allowing some temporary signs in the right
of way.
Comparison of Old and New Sign Ordinances with regards to some temporary signs
Old Ordinance New (Current) Ordinance* Proposed Modifications**
A-frames A-frames A-frames
Where allowed: Where allowed: Where allowed:
Commercial, Industrial, Churches Commercial, Industrial, Residential
for non-residential uses and as a
residential directional sign
At least 1-foot behind curb/edge of
pavement; not on sidewalk, in parking
space, or median
Not in ROW, on a sidewalk, parking
space, or median
In ROW in designated Town Center
Pedestrian area or when used as a
Residential Directional sign;
Not on a sidewalk – staff recommendation
On a sidewalk in the Pedestrian area with
minimum 6’ clearance – P&Z
recommendation
Not in the Shea ROW Not in the Shea ROW
When displayed: When displayed: When displayed:
7:00 am to 9:00 pm No limit
“Sunset” provision: “Sunset” provision: “Sunset” provision:
No A-frames anywhere after
December 31, 2020
No sunset provision
Number: Number: Number:
One per street front One per business
Contractor, Future Development, Real
Estate
Post and Board Post and Board
Where allowed: Where allowed: Where allowed:
Contractor – on a construction site;
not in ROW
All zoning districts, not in ROW All zoning districts
* New (current) ordinance provisions approved by Council in May; based on no temporary signs in the right of way.
** These are the proposed modifications as recommended by staff and P&Z. Highlighted blank boxes mean no modifications have been
proposed for those provisions. Additional modifications may be proposed by the Council to address allowing some temporary signs in the right
of way.
Old Ordinance New (Current) Ordinance* Proposed Modifications**
Future Development – undeveloped
property prior to issuance of a building
permit; not in ROW
Permit to allow in ROW when building
brought to street or topography does not
allow visibility – staff recommendation
In the ROW – P&Z recommendation Real Estate – on property for sale,
lease or rent; not in ROW
Number: Number: Number:
Contractor – one per lot One per street front
Future Development & Real Estate –
one per street front
Garage Sale, Open House Residential Directional Residential Directional
Where allowed: Where allowed: Where allowed:
1-foot behind curb/edge of
pavement; not on sidewalk or
medians; Garage sale may not be
attached to utility pole, light pole,
street sign, etc.
On private property On private property any day; in ROW
(except Shea) on Friday, Saturday, Sunday
from official sunrise to official sunset;
3’ behind the curb/edge of pavement
Garage Sale – not in Shea ROW;
Open House – not within 150’ of
Shea ROW
Number and Separation: Number and Separation: Number and Separation:
Not more than 5 signs for one
location
One on the property and maximum
of 5 leading to the property – 6 total
Garage sale – 300’ separation
between signs bearing same or
similar message;
Open House – 100’ between signs
advertising the same location
No specific separation standards in
single residence zones; max. 2 temp
signs per street front per lot.
* New (current) ordinance provisions approved by Council in May; based on no temporary signs in the right of way.
** These are the proposed modifications as recommended by staff and P&Z. Highlighted blank boxes mean no modifications have been
proposed for those provisions. Additional modifications may be proposed by the Council to address allowing some temporary signs in the right
of way.
Old Ordinance New (Current) Ordinance* Proposed Modifications**
When displayed: When displayed: When displayed:
Garage sale – sunrise to sunset No limits No limits on private property; weekends in
ROW (except Shea), from official sunrise to
official sunset
Sign type: Sign type: Sign type:
Technically A-frame not allowed by
code, but have been by practice
A-frame and Yard signs
Banners, Balloons, & Pennants Banners and Balloons Banners and Balloons
Where allowed: Where allowed: Where allowed:
Commercial, Industrial, Lodges,
Churches
Commercial, Industrial, non-
residential in residential zones
Long list of location parameters, not in
ROW
Kept same location parameters
except removed limitation on
banners being between 4’ – 20’ from
main building entrance; removed
limitation on aggregate area; not in
ROW
When displayed: When displayed: When displayed:
30-days with permit for specific uses 30-days per year, no limit on
purpose; additional time through
TUP
Two 7-day periods per month for
unspecified uses
Balloons – 12 hours during one day
event
“Sunset” provision: “Sunset” provision: “Sunset” provision:
No banners, balloons, pennants
anywhere after December 31, 2020
No sunset provision
* New (current) ordinance provisions approved by Council in May; based on no temporary signs in the right of way.
** These are the proposed modifications as recommended by staff and P&Z. Highlighted blank boxes mean no modifications have been
proposed for those provisions. Additional modifications may be proposed by the Council to address allowing some temporary signs in the right
of way.
Old Ordinance New (Current) Ordinance* Proposed Modifications**
Number: Number: Number:
One banner per business One banner per occupancy
(business)
Number of balloons not specified No limit on number of balloons
Some changes to permanent signage:
Increased wall sign area allowance from 1 sq. ft./ft. of frontage to 1.5 sq. ft.
Eliminated aggregate sign area maximum
Added option for multiple monument signs with more than 300’ of frontage
Amended the Sign Plan option to allow for increases in height and size of signs
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Ari
zo
n
a
F
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989Shea BlvdF
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
H
i
l
l
sBl
v
d
S
a
g
u
a
r
o
B
l
v
d SaguaroBlvdPal
isadesBlvd
Vicinity MapCommercial&IndustrialTemporary Signagealong the propertyfrontage &right-of-wayMAP #112345567891011
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDSHEA BLVDSHEA BLVDEagle MountainVillage Market PlaceFireRock CountryClubEAGLEMOUNTAINPKWYFIREROCKCOUNTRYCLUB DRMAP 1DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Ari
zon
a
F
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989SHEA BLVDSA
G
U
A
R
O
B
L
V
D Target CenterCircle KIndustrialFHMedical CenterCOMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 2DRAFTDESIGNATED FLOODPLAINAREA, SIGNS IN THESEAREAS COULD BEPROBLEMATIC AND MAY NOTBE ALLOWED.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989SAGUARO BLVDTarget CenterIndustrialIndustrialCOMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 3DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989SHEA BLVDSAGUARO BLVD
TSCWendy'sCircle KDenny'sWelcomeCenterM
O
N
T
E
R
E
Y
D
R
COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 4DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989S
A
G
U
A
R
O
B
L
V
DAMHURST DRINDIAN
W
E
L
L
S
D
RDesert CanyonGolf CourseKINGSTREE BLVDNICKLAUS DRA
L
L
E
Y
Plat 202Plat 202COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 5DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989Desrt Vista ParkSAGUARO BLVDCOMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 6DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989PlazaFountainsideSAGUARO BLVDFountain ParkFHSDCOMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 7DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989Plat 208Plat 208BashasCivicCenterFountain ParkPALISADES BLVDSAGUARO BLVD
COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 8DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989Plat 208BashasCivicCenterSafewayThe HeavenlyThe EnclavePALISADES BLVDFOUNTAIN HILLS BLVD
COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 9DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989SAGUARO BLVDMedical CenterPlat 208BashasPALISADES BLVDPlat 208COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 10DRAFT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Arizo
n
aF
O
UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF
INC. 1989FOUNTAIN HILLS BLVD
GLENBROOK BLVDEL PUEBLO BLVDIVORY DRALLEYALLEY Plat 430Plat 106COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIALTEMPORARY SIGNAGEALONG THE PROPERTYFRONTAGE &RIGHT-OF-WAYAREA WHERE A-FRAME, POSTAND BOARD, AND YARDSIGNS ARE PERMITTEDMAP 11DRAFT