Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022.0215.TCRM.Agenda.Packet       NOTICE OF MEETING REGULAR MEETING FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL A M E N D E D 02/14/2022    Mayor Ginny Dickey Vice Mayor Alan Magazine Councilmember Gerry Friedel Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski Councilmember Peggy McMahon Councilmember Mike Scharnow Councilmember David Spelich    TIME:5:30 P.M. – REGULAR MEETING WHEN:TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2022 WHERE:   FOUNTAIN HILLS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 16705 E. AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINS, FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ Councilmembers of the Town of Fountain Hills will attend either in person or by telephone conference call; a quorum of the Town’s various Commission, Committee or Board members may be in attendance at the Council meeting. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9, subject to certain specified statutory exceptions, parents have a right to consent before the State or any of its political subdivisions make a video or audio recording of a minor child. Meetings of the Town Council are audio and/or video recorded and, as a result, proceedings in which children are present may be subject to such recording. Parents, in order to exercise their rights may either file written consent with the Town Clerk to such recording, or take personal action to ensure that their child or children are not present when a recording may be made. If a child is present at the time a recording is made, the Town will assume that the rights afforded parents pursuant to A.R.S. §1-602.A.9 have been waived.    REQUEST TO COMMENT The public is welcome to participate in Council meetings. TO SPEAK TO AN AGENDA ITEM, please complete a Request to Comment card, located in the back of the Council Chambers, and hand it to the Town Clerk prior to discussion of that item, if possible. Include the agenda item on which you wish to comment. Speakers will be allowed three contiguous minutes to address the Council. Verbal comments should be directed through the Presiding Officer and not to individual Councilmembers. TO COMMENT ON AN AGENDA ITEM IN WRITING ONLY, please complete a Request to Comment card, indicating it is a written comment, and check the box on whether you are FOR or AGAINST and agenda item, and hand it to the Town Clerk prior to discussion, if possible. TO COMMENT IN WRITING ONLINE : Please feel free to provide your comments by visiting  https://www.fh.az.gov/publiccomment and SUBMIT a Public Comment Card by 3:00 PM on the day of the meeting . These comments will be shared with the Town Council.         NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the Town Council, and to the general public, that at this meeting, the Town Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the Town's attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).        1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Dickey     2.MOMENT OF SILENCE     3.ROLL CALL – Mayor Dickey     4.REPORTS BY MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND TOWN MANAGER     A.RECOGNITION: Stellar Students of the Month for January 2022     B.RECOGNITION: Outgoing Planning and Zoning Commissioner Jessie Brunswig.    C.PROCLAMATION: Declaring February 25, 2022, as National Skip the Straw Day.    D.PROCLAMATION: Declaring February 12, 2022, as Sally Atchinson Day.    5.SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES/PRESENTATIONS     A.PRESENTATION: Republic Services Grant Awards to Fountain Hills Nonprofit Organizations.    6.CALL TO THE PUBLIC Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the agenda. Any such comment (i) must be within the jurisdiction of the Council, and (ii) is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during Call to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion of the Call to the Public, individual councilmembers may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or (iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Council agenda.     7.CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, noncontroversial matters and will be enacted by one motion of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all recommended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a councilmember or member of the public so requests. If a councilmember or member of the public wishes to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda, he/she may request so prior to the motion to accept the Consent Agenda or with notification to the Town Manager or Mayor prior to the date of the meeting for which the item was scheduled. The items will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.        Town Council Regular Meeting of February 15, 2022 2 of 4   A.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022.      B.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Resolution 2022-04, abandoning the entirety of a 30 foot Public Alley located within Block 1 of Fountain Hills Plat 302-A (Book 164 of maps, Page 43, MCR), adjacent to Lots 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14 and 15; including a finding of de minimis value.     C.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: approving a Special Event Liquor License application for the Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce for a beer garden in conjunction with the Fountain Festival of Arts and Crafts FOUNTAIN HILLS DAY on Saturday,  February MARCH 26, 2022.     D.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Liquor License Application for Bashas' #47, located at 16605 E. Palisades Boulevard, Fountain Hills, Arizona, for a Series 9 Liquor Store license.      E.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION:  approving a Special Event Liquor License application for Valors on 8th for a beer garden in conjunction with the Mountain 2 Fountain on March 6, 2022.     8.REGULAR AGENDA     A.PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Regarding Ordinance 21-17, amending Chapter 10, Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts, Section 10.04, General Provisions, to add design standards for single-family dwellings.     B.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION: Community Center and Special Event Fee Waiver Policy.     C.DISCUSSION WITH POSSIBLE DIRECTION relating to any item included in the League of Arizona Cities and Towns’ weekly Legislative Bulletin(s) or relating to any action proposed or pending before the State Legislature.     9.COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION to the TOWN MANAGER Item(s) listed below are related only to the propriety of (i) placing such item(s) on a future agenda for action, or (ii) directing staff to conduct further research and report back to the Council.     10.ADJOURNMENT      Town Council Regular Meeting of February 15, 2022 3 of 4 Town Council Regular Meeting of February 15, 2022 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted in accordance with the statement filed by the Town Council with the Town Clerk. Dated this / tday of Yi 2022. 'a -'Sdp Elizabeth in, MMC,Town Clerk The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities.Please call 480-816-5199(voice)or 1-800-367-8939(TDD)48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain agenda information in large print format.Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the Council with this agenda are available for review in the Clerk's Office.       CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF NOTICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing notice was duly posted in accordance with the statement filed by the Town Council with the Town Clerk. Dated this ______ day of ____________________, 2022. _____________________________________________  Elizabeth A. Klein, MMC, Town Clerk   The Town of Fountain Hills endeavors to make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Please call 480-816-5199 (voice) or 1-800-367-8939 (TDD) 48 hours prior to the meeting to request a reasonable accommodation to participate in the meeting or to obtain agenda information in large print format. Supporting documentation and staff reports furnished the Council with this agenda are available for review in the Clerk's Office.    Town Council Regular Meeting of February 15, 2022 4 of 4 ITEM 4. C. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Reports                  Submitting Department: Administration Prepared by: Angela Padgett-Espiritu, Executive Assistant to Manager, Mayor/Council Staff Contact Information: Angela Padgett-Espiritu, Executive Assistant to Manager, Mayor/Council Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  PROCLAMATION: Declaring February 25, 2022, as National Skip the Straw Day. Staff Summary (Background) Mayor Dickey will be proclaiming February 25, 2022, as National Skip the Straw Day. Attachments Proclamation - National Skip the Straw Day  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Director David Pock 02/07/2022 04:34 PM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/07/2022 04:41 PM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 07:17 AM Form Started By: Angela Padgett-Espiritu Started On: 02/07/2022 03:53 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  ITEM 4. D. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Reports                  Submitting Department: Administration Prepared by: Angela Padgett-Espiritu, Executive Assistant to Manager, Mayor/Council Staff Contact Information: Angela Padgett-Espiritu, Executive Assistant to Manager, Mayor/Council Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  PROCLAMATION: Declaring February 12, 2022, as Sally Atchinson Day. Staff Summary (Background) Mayor Dickey will be proclaiming February 12, 2022, as Sally Atchinson Day in Fountain Hills.  Attachments Proclamation - Sally Atchinson Day  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Director David Pock 02/07/2022 04:34 PM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/07/2022 04:41 PM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 07:17 AM Form Started By: Angela Padgett-Espiritu Started On: 02/07/2022 03:47 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  ITEM 5. A. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Public Appearances/Presentations                   Submitting Department: Administration Prepared by: Eric Prochnow, Econ. Dev. & Tourism Specialist Staff Contact Information: Eric Prochnow, Econ. Dev. & Tourism Specialist Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  PRESENTATION: Republic Services Grant Awards to Fountain Hills Nonprofit Organizations. Staff Summary (Background) The Town of Fountain Hills and Republic Services have worked in close partnership for a number of years to provide non-profit organizations with grant funding to support Fountain Hills-based  nonprofit organizations. The grant program funds projects/programs that encourage stewardship of the environment, enhance the natural beauty of the town, provide public enjoyment, support healthy lifestyles and human services, and provide educational opportunities.  A total of ten grant applications were reviewed by a grant panel based primarily on the impact of the proposed grant projects on the community and how it addresses human and environmental challenges and opportunities. Based on a number of competitive and impactful applications, the grant panel had the difficult task of scoring, evaluating, and making decisions on how the $10,000 grant fund would be disbursed between organizations. The five organizations being awarded grant funding from Republic Services are as follows:  Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Scottsdale (McKee Branch) - $3,500 Fountain Hills Youth Substance Abuse Prevention Coalition - $3,500 Fountain Hills Dark Sky Association - $1,000 Fountain Hills Theater - $1,000 The Matthew Community at Church of the Ascension - $1,000 The Town of Fountain Hills greatly appreciates the partnership with Republic Services in providing grant funding to our community-based organizations.   Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Director David Pock 02/03/2022 08:41 AM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/03/2022 10:11 AM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/04/2022 10:50 AM Form Started By: Eric Prochnow Started On: 02/02/2022 03:28 PM Final Approval Date: 02/04/2022  ITEM 7. A. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Consent                  Submitting Department: Administration Prepared by: Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk Staff Contact Information: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022.  Staff Summary (Background) The intent of approving meeting minutes is to ensure an accurate account of the discussion and action that took place at the meeting for archival purposes. Approved minutes are placed on the Town's website and maintained as permanent records in compliance with state law. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle N/A Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022. SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022.  Attachments Minutes  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 10:54 AM Form Started By: Elizabeth A. Klein Started On: 02/08/2022 08:29 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL FEBRUARY 1, 2022            1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Mayor Dickey    Mayor Dickey called the Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Town Council held February 1, 2022, to order at 5:30 p.m.   2.MOMENT OF SILENCE    A Moment of Silence was held.   3.ROLL CALL – Mayor Dickey Present: Mayor Ginny Dickey; Vice Mayor Alan Magazine; Councilmember Peggy McMahon; Councilmember Gerry Friedel; Councilmember Mike Scharnow (telephonically); Councilmember David Spelich; Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski Staff Present: Town Manager Grady E. Miller; Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson; Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Klein 4.REPORTS BY MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND TOWN MANAGER    Councilmember Friedel reported that he attended the GPEC Economic Trends session where he learned that Arizona has regained 124% of those jobs lost during the pandemic. He said that it struck him funny since every business is looking for employees. He said that interest rates have little to do with the price of homes; it has more to do with the need and that is what is driving up the prices. Councilmember Grzybowski reported that she attended the GPEC Board of Directors Meeting, the State of the Town, the Healthy Cities Webinar, review of the GPEC Economic Trends Regional Report, and the legislative call with the League of Arizona Cities and Towns. She said that, once again, it feels like the state is trying to tell them how to spend their money, and do not know how to instill their own zoning codes. Some legislators have had council positions previously, and perhaps they should question what they are doing to benefit cities and towns. She reminded everyone that on Saturday they will be holding a skate competition at the Skate Park and Saturday night will be the Teen Community Center Takeover. Vice Mayor Magazine said that he has been railing for years now on the priorities in decision-making by the state legislature. Every time they meet he holds his breath.      Vice Mayor Magazine said that he did not want to do anything inappropriate, so he conferred with the Town Attorney. He then asked the Mayor for a point of personal privilege, for which she allowed. He said that there is an issue of deep concern to him and he feels compelled to speak out. At the last meeting they had a unity pledge—a non discrimination pledge by the town which includes that they as a town do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion and so on. In that context he wanted to note that January 27 was National Holocaust Remembrance Day. He said that if they have seen the news, they will know that Jews make up 2.4% (7.6 million people) of the country’s population. Just 2.4%, yet the amount of antisemitism has risen to the highest level in decades. It includes synagogues being set on fire and attacks against individuals. Last week an elderly woman spat on an 8 year old child outside a synagogue simply because the child was Jewish. Last weekend it was discovered that dozens of swastikas were drawn on pillars around the exterior of Union Station in Washington D.C. Sunday’s New York Times reported, “A school board in Tennessee voted unanimously to ban Maus, a Pulitzer Prizewinning graphic novel about the holocaust from being taught in classrooms. Yesterday the American Library Association reported that it received “an unprecedented 330 reports of book challenges last year." Legislatures throughout the country are considering banning some books—including the Arizona House Education Committee. He asked where it led. Some people are likening COVID protections like masks to the holocaust; right wing Nazi sympathizers marched through the streets of Charlottesville; Gorge Soros, a Hungarian Jew, has been vilified because he financially supports Jewish causes. He said that he wanted to make very clear that he knew of no incidents in Fountain Hills. But, Scottsdale has had its share of problems and they could be next. He said that he realizes that lots of groups suffer from discrimination. But, the amount of discrimination against Jews has reached a crescendo not seen in this country in many years. He was glad that his parents, who were founders with other families, of a synagogue outside Boston were not alive to witness this. He said the situation is so heinous, that he felt a moral imperative to speak out. He thanked the Mayor for the opportunity.    Mayor Dickey said that she heard similar issues raised on the news today, and she thanked Vice Mayor Magazine for his leadership. She thanked staff for their work on the recent State of the Town, and also thanked those that attended. She said that she was glad to hear that Councilmember Grzybowski attended the Healthy Cities Webinar. She attended the Volunteer Expo, which is always a nice, positive event. She was glad to see some of the great organizations in action from throughout the town. Councilmember Scharnow said that he had a Valley Metro Board Meeting two weeks ago, and they continue their search for a CEO and CFO. He also attended the Kiwanis blood drive and Volunteer Expo, which he said is always uplifting. Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 2 of 13 He wrote the area legislators about the enabling legislation extending Prop 400, the half-cent sales tax for continuing transportation needs within the state. He is attending a conference in Washington D.C. with the Drug Prevention Coalition and hopes to meet with Representative Schweikert. He said that the main point of the conference is the best drug prevention tool is local control.   A.RECOGNITION : Outgoing McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission Member Tom Barberic    Mayor Dickey said that Mr. Tom Barberic was unable to attend the meeting this evening, but they wanted to recognize Mr. Barberic, who was appointed to the McDowell Mountain Preservation Commission by the Town Council in January 2009. She said Tom has been a pragmatic voice and critical thinker in regards to trail development, public access, and sustainability. He has offered his time and talents in policy development as well as hands-on trail building and maintenance. His dedication and ardent support to the Commission and the Town of Fountain Hills has been evident by his many hours of volunteer service and is sincerely appreciated by the Council, his fellow Commissioners, and all the Town’s residents.   5.SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES/PRESENTATIONS   A.PRESENTATION: Monthly Report by Capt. Kratzer with Maricopa County Sheriff's Office    Captain Kratzer said that he wanted to provide an update on recent "smash and grabs" occurring in town. He said that there have been eight car break-ins in the last three weeks, and the MO is the same. All eight have occurred on Thursday or Friday afternoon, and all but one was in a business parking lot. He said that in three of the instances, a dark-colored, four-door sedan was identified, possibly a Kia or Chevy Malibu. He said that with one of the cases, a Tesla's camera got a video of the suspect and one of the detectives identified him as an investigative lead. They do have some evidence submitted for fingerprints. In three or four of the cases, credit cards taken were used immediately at Target and Walgreens. He reminded everyone to keep any valuables out of sight in their vehicles. Captain Kratzer also reported on traffic enforcement since his last report. In that time frame they have reiterated to the department to focus of speed and stop sign violations. Within that time frame they have had 242 traffic stops. He said that 160 were for speeding, with 4 for criminal speed citations. They added enforcement at the Palisades/Shea intersection and had 23 citations written for turning right on red. He said that Town staff is working on a strategy for that intersection. Once it is complete they will bring it to Council. Kudos to Justin. Mayor Dickey thanked Captain Kratzer, noting that she has seen a lot more presence around.   6.CALL TO THE PUBLIC Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 3 of 13 6.CALL TO THE PUBLIC Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted (not required) on matters NOT listed on the agenda. Any such comment (i) must be within the jurisdiction of the Council, and (ii) is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during Call to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action. At the conclusion of the Call to the Public, individual councilmembers may (i) respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or (iii) ask that the matter be placed on a future Council agenda.    Mayor Dickey reviewed the purpose of Call to the Public. She said that for those watching at home, it is not clear that Council can receive comments on items not on the agenda, but they are not permitted to respond to them, other than to address derogatory comments at the end of Call to the Public, because the public would not have notice of what was going to be discussed. To do so would be a violation of the open meeting law. The following individuals addressed the Council regarding a recent incident involving Councilmember Peggy McMahon and Vice Mayor Alan Magazine, and circulation of petitions at Pearl Nutrition. • Tim Spielbusch, owner of Pearl Nutrition • Mark Biermann • Hannah Toth Comments included: • On Tuesday, January 25, Peggy McMahon entered his business, Pearl Nutrition, and seeing that petitions were on the counter, she asked whether he allows anyone to put their petitions out. He responds "if they're a client of mine, absolutely". She then left. • On Wednesday January 26, Vice Mayor Alan Magazine entered Pearl Nutrition, and identified himself, stating that Councilmember McMahon had told him about the petitions and he was going to take pictures of them. He demanded that the petitions be taken off of the counter, stating that it was "illegal" if the candidate is not present. • He felt bullied and threatened. • He notified the candidates about these encounters. • He will be filing an ethics complaint for violation of 8.3, 8.4, 8.6 and 8.8 of the Town's Ethics Policy. • As Town Council, they should not allow this to happen; it is a negative mark on the residents and business owners. • They expect the Vice Mayor and Councilmember McMahon to not intimidate businesses. • This action was interference with an election. They called the county right away and was told it was permitted. • There is a need to have the Planning and Zoning Commission meetings televised to keep the residents informed. Crystal Cavanaugh, Fountain Hills, said she understands the hurdles faced by the Town in addressing the sober living houses, but there is so much more they can do. She said that someone has been buying up lots along Fountain Hills Blvd. through MCO Realty. She asked where the transparency was. They need ordinances and oversight, and need to schedule a special meeting to address the issue. Ed Stizza, Fountain Hills, stated there were serious holes and the Town Council is the only line of defense they have. Everyone needs to get on the same page. With regard to the item on the agenda, they need to be on top of the Park Place project. He asked the Town Council and staff to do everything they can to protect everything within the town. He has Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 4 of 13 not heard any discussion about the crosswalk and the detox facility issue is a growing problem. Ronald Rich, Fountain Hills, voiced concern with the recent articles in the newspaper regarding sodium in the water and encouraged the Town Council to address the issue collaboratively with the Sanitary District to find solutions. Mayor Dickey noted that the Town and Sanitary District have created a task force to address the sodium issue. She said that Councilmembers Grzybowski and Scharnow sit on the committee, along with members from the Sanitary District, and they are meeting regularly. She thanked Mr. Rich for his comments. Mayor Dickey reported that the Town is working on having Planning and Zoning Commission meetings streamed in the future. Vice Mayor Magazine said that the amount of exaggeration from the individuals speaking against him was stunning. He did not have a camera; his phone was in his pocket. He was not bullying, and his voice was modulated. He wanted them to know that he believed the petitions were illegal. He asked that they do file a complaint. Councilmember McMahon said that the three people that spoke were rude and underhanded; they spread lies and were without merit. She walked in there in good faith, ordered, and saw the petitions. She asked if they allowed other petitions. She spent $48, and for the candidates to take this opportunity to disparage her--shame on them. She said that the lies and conspiracy theory are absolutely false, and she expected an apology. Mayor Dickey said that the process they are taking regarding detox and sober living facilities is the same process they use for every other ordinance. She did not understand the comments being made about their lack of action. On February 14, 2022, they will discuss the issues at the Planning and Zoning Commission, and then it will come to the Town Council. They are working through the process they follow each time with a code change.   7.CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, noncontroversial matters and will be enacted by one motion of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all recommended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a councilmember or member of the public so requests. If a councilmember or member of the public wishes to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda, he/she may request so prior to the motion to accept the Consent Agenda or with notification to the Town Manager or Mayor prior to the date of the meeting for which the item was scheduled. The items will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.    MOVED BY Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski, SECONDED BY Councilmember David Spelich to approve Consent Agenda Items 7-A and 7-B.  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed - Unanimously   A.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of the minutes of the Special Meeting of January 18, 2022, and the Regular Meeting of January 18, 2022, and the Special Meeting of January 19, 2022.      Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 5 of 13 B.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approving a Special Event Liquor License application for the Dark Sky Association for a beer garden in conjunction with the Dark Sky Festival on March 26, 2022.      8.REGULAR AGENDA   A.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Artistic Land Management Landscaping, Inc. Contract 2022-057       Mr. Miller said that the Parks Superintendent would give a brief staff report. Parks Superintendent Kevin Snipes said that they were before Council two years ago doing the same thing. They have had many difficulties with the contractor they selected at that time. The contractor sent a 30-day notice to the Town, just as the Town was looking for a new one. The Town received proposals from two vendors, and after review and scoring by a four-person panel, they were recommending Artistic Landscape Management. He said that the scoring is based on general information and qualifications required to work with municipalities, such as key positions being Arizona certified land professionals, Arizona certified arborists, nursery professionals, etc. to make sure they have qualified candidates coming in. Pricing is one area on which they grade. They were recommending Artistic Landscape Management at a contract amount of $492,233, with $50,000 for any supplemental work that may be needed, for an amount of $542,232 per year for five years. Mr. Miller said that the last company was considered one of the largest in the country. They were very low priced, but the low bid does not always come in with the best service. In this case, they were not able to keep up and the Town received numerous complaints. Mayor Dickey asked if they also take care of irrigation. Mr. Snipes said that they take care of the rights-of-way and open space and the Town staff takes care of irrigation in the parks and Town Hall campus. He said that they are constantly fighting problems with the reclaimed water, especially at Fountain Park. They are going through the Town Hall campus now and checking for meters overflowing.    MOVED BY Councilmember Gerry Friedel, SECONDED BY Councilmember Sharron Grzybowski to approve a multi-year contract (Contract 2022-057) with Artistic Land Management Landscaping Inc. in an annual amount not to exceed $542,233.  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed - Unanimously   Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 6 of 13        B.CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION to provide staff with direction on requested amendments to the Park Place Development Agreement.       Development Services Director John Wesley, attending telephonically, gave a brief presentation which addressed: N-Shea, the developer of Park Place, is ready to move forward with the additional phases of this development. The project has a development agreement that was approved by the Town Council on June 16, 2016. That development agreement includes four provisions that the developer is now requesting to modify. Those changes include: Reducing the total number of parking spaces in the "New Town Parking Lots" from 130 to 103 Amending the ratio of residential space to commercial space from 10:1 to 12.4:1 Allowing for four stories of residential use in Building B Allowing building E to have ground floor residential uses Vice Mayor Magazine asked if the 54' height was by right. Mr. Wesley said that the Town Code has a maximum height of 40'; however 54' was given through the original development agreement. Mr. Bart Shea said that he submitted a full concept plan to Planning and Zoning. He was not sure how they took that submittal to just the site plan approval, and he does not believe he needs any amendments. He said that some of the issues Mr. Wesley brought up were established in the development agreement. Residential on the bottom floor was allowed for Sections 2 and 3; they could not have commercial on B and F. That was a give. They wanted to save the commercial for the corner. The Town dictated where they started commercial. He does not believe they need to modify the development agreement because staff is not taking into account the minor General Plan Amendment approved previously. He said that they want to lose the commercial on the bottom floor because they cannot lease the commercial they currently have. He personally put in $80,000 so a tenant could move into the building. He said that he did not know how they got here. He submitted a plan for Planning and Zoning Commission and Council, without amendments. Staff felt these were amendments needed. He had to force a meeting with Mr. Miller and Mr. Wesley, and that is when he found out they were on the agenda. He said that the memo from staff is completely not normal. Normally, he would submit a set of plans and staff redlines them. He received redlines and staff had changed the entrance on the corner to add another entrance, flipping the parking around. Mr. Shea then reviewed the plans, noting that they would repaint the current Park Place to match this portion of the development, but they will not do Morning Star. He said that they should withdraw the amendments and run through the normal channels to get before Council. Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 7 of 13 Mr. Miller said that staff's viewpoint, and legal opinion, is that the items being requested required an amendment to the development agreement to allow them to do what was being requested. He said that in other cities, they may have a PAD and based on market conditions, things can change, but this development agreement outlined every building the way it was to be built. Mr. Shea said that would be true, as read, but that is not his interpretation. He said that they have to take into account there was a minor General Plan Amendment specifically in this area. Mr. Shea asked if they would not submit the development agreement to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Arnson said that the site plan would go through Planning and Zoning Commission. The issue as Mr. Wesley identified some of the details of the site plan are not consistent with the development agreement. Councilmember Spelich said he was confused. The developer is saying he did not agree with the amendments and want them pulled. If that is the case, he asked why they were still there. Mayor Dickey said that the developer is determining that it does not require an amendment to build as shown on the site plan; staff and legal counsel believe that amendments are required. Vice Mayor Magazine asked if some of the bottom floors were below grade. Mr. Shea said that they were inside Building E. Vice Mayor Magazine asked if they were not concerned they may get another flood. Mr. Shea said that they spent $2 million to put in underground parking; they are not worried about that. Mr. Shea then introduced Ken Okamoto, Button Capital, who is a partner on the next two phases. Mr. Okamoto said that they purchased Park Place in April a couple of years ago and they have become members of the community. They are not simply absentee owners. They have done their best to try and grow the businesses there to be supported by the residents. He said that in the last 1 1/2 years they have had 18% of the retail occupied. It is very tough; the hardest he has ever seen. They also own commercial property in Phoenix, but they have had no problem getting tenants there. Here, they have had to subsidize tenants to pay for a lot of improvements to get them in there. He said that it is not viable to bring in a lot of retail within the next 15 years. Mr. Okamoto said that when this was conceived they envisioned work force housing, with studio housing on the back. Through them owning Park Place, they found that what most people want are two bedroom units, and that is what they are trying to provide. He said that he did not think staff had a problem with four floors, as long as it was tasteful. They are aware of the ugly color on the original buildings; once they paint everything they will be consistent. He said they can change plans to meet parking requirements. They also have to look at the economic reality of the situation. They are in this for serving what residents want. By reducing the number of retail, they will strengthen the core of what they do have. He has been doing development in California, and the concept is implied in most agreements. They have to look at the agreement and what was intended. Mr. Shea's view is that it Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 8 of 13 requires substantial compliance. He said they are willing to go through the process. In terms of getting to the finish line, they would like to get this built so they can meet the demands. There is hardly anything to rent. He then introduced Wade Felkins, architect, who came forward and said he has been in the area since 1973. He said they have had challenges along the way, and there have been areas where they have compromised. Mr. Arnson said that he located the 2016 resolution adopting the minor General Plan Amendment. He said that it changed densities, but did not mention number of floors. He does not see how it changes anything. Mayor Dickey reviewed the various residential projects throughout town. She still looks back at the Downtown Area Specific Plan by Swayback. The intent is to be their downtown. While she is glad they have people living there now, to her at that time, she would not have wanted residential on the corner. She is inclined to support "no residential" on the first floor. They have to live with the 54', but she would not want to see that expanded. Staff had concerns with the reduced parking, and she has issues as well. Mr. Shea said, with regard to parking, they would lose some of the walkway on the town parcel; they can reduce the grass and increase the parking. Those are things they would normally address in a development agreement. The following individuals then addressed the Council regarding the project: • Larry Meyers • Greg Johnson • Tammy Doss • Betsy LaVoie • Stan Connick • Sandi McGee • Jenny Willigrod, Public Art Committee • Dori Wittrig • Art Tolis • Jay Schlum • Cecil Yates • Ed Stizza Comments included: • He told them so. • He visited the Strategic Planning Advisory Commission meeting and all the strategic plans are written to have the same general theme--natural beauty, vibrant downtown, bring in young people, outdoors. The Strategic Plan consists of the great dreams of Fountain Hills. The only people getting in the way is the staff and government. • In 2016, he told then Mayor Cavanagh that this development was not vibrant. He had a great plan, but could not finance it. • When they give up on a dream, they are finished. They gave up on that piece of land. With the existing building it is the end of the vibrant dream. • He asked the Council to do the best they can to keep whatever is left from the bad decision made in 2016. • He agreed with the Mayor. Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 9 of 13 • When it was first built, he thought the concrete was supposed to be finished. Not a major issue, but if they are going to the next phase it should be addressed. • If memory serves him, they owed $800,000 in building permits, but it went from one lawyer's office to another. • There was an issue with property on the other side of this area with overspray on the windows. Will that issue be dealt with? • Has been a homeowner in Fountain Hills since 2016. • She sold a very large home to buy a condo that will face this building. They heard they were getting a Kierland Style development, but then it was built. They figured they would take advantage of that and tried to open a business, but it was rejected because the residential density had not been built out. She has been waiting for the rest of the commercial to be built so she could open underneath, but now she is hearing it will be residential. • As far as removing any of the art walk to put in additional parking, that would affect her. • Asked the Council to consider making no changes to this and stay with first floor commercial. • Due to the shortage in housing and availability of commercial space, rentals would be impactful. The staffing shortage is directly related to this. • Businesses need local support in rental housing for job retention. • Along with the success of Havenly, this responsible development would be an added benefit. • She thanked the developers for choosing Fountain Hills. • He is a local architect. He thought they wanted commercial on the corner, but in talking with someone, he questioned whether they really want another Gilbert with intense activity. • Mr. Shea has proven himself; with the positiveness that he has given the community, he could not thank him enough. • She is past Theater Board President and wanted to make them aware that Bart Shea has been a long-time valued donor. • His support and contributions have been given without recognition. • The amount of time, construction and funding he has provided to the theater is over $50,000 • Is on the new Public Art Committee and they are looking forward to working with Bart; they have worked well together in the past. • She also worked with Bart as past president of FHCCA, and he was involved with volunteering hours and materials for the community garden. • Let this move forward. Reminded everyone that the community was conceived to be 72,000 residents; it has been reduced to less than half that and there is too much commercial. • The responsibility of Council and staff is to be fair with Mr. Shea. Right now, this process has been far from fair. He spoke with Mr. Shea last week and the vast majority of what is being discussed should have been discussed in executive session, but Mr. Shea was not invited into the executive session. • This process could cost the developer money and investor relations. Being fair is critical. This process is out of line. • Most people he speaks with that are new to town go downtown and say, "this is coming along." • Over the last 15 years they have seen things change. • Some say the downtown is way too big, they need more residential. • He is excited for another 188 units. • Encouraged staff and leaders to be engaged. • As the market changes, they need to change with it. • The project started with the development agreement; it was only done to get the first Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 10 of 13 project pushed through. • The development agreement expires June 1, 2022. If that is the case, they should try to do the best development and use of land. • A lot of people did not want the first development with Park Place. • Let the development agreement expire and start over. Town Clerk Elizabeth Klein noted that two written comments were also submitted: Randall Doss - against the proposal; Don Hervey, Commander for the VFW Post 7507 - in support of the proposal. Vice Mayor Magazine said that units at Park Place are fairly expensive. He asked how they square that with the need for workers in restaurants. Ms. Wittrig replied that there are others in the community with better credit ratings. If there are more rentals, they would be able to move into Park Place and other areas, freeing up some of the lower end rental housing for the work force. Mayor Dickey said that it is not like they are saying they do not want more residential. There are three more projects on line ready to be completed providing more housing. This is the prime avenue in town. There are other reasons, aside from housing, that businesses are struggling for workers. Mayor Dickey said that the first thing established was the proper and only legal way to go forward. There has been plenty of discussion with staff and Mr. Shea. She said that they have followed this process with every project. Councilmember Grzybowski thanked Ms. Wittrig and Mr. Yates for their statistics. She said that she loves the concept of residential only. One of the biggest complaints they get is how much vacant commercial space there is. She does have a problem with the parking issue. People drive in Fountain Hills. She would not be in favor of the amendment as proposed. Mr. Shea said that the parking ratio on units themselves meet the standards. The only reduction is parking on the town-owned lots. Councilmember Spelich said that he was not going to say much, but two former councilmembers have basically said the Council is not giving customer service and not being fair. It was no secret that when he ran for election, he was opposed to Park Place and a primary property tax; both of them were for. He is sitting in the chair because of decisions they made previously. For them to come to an open meeting and call the Council out is not right. Also, it seems like the majority of those speaking on Mr. Shea's behalf have some ties to real estate or have had previous dealings with the developer. Councilmember Scharnow said that he is in favor of completing development in the downtown area. He has been in town since 1983 and has been a proponent for growth. He voted for Daybreak. But, he agrees with Councilmember Spelich in terms of process. If Mr. Tolis had his way, they would be meeting behind closed doors. He has issues with the way things have been proposed. He backs staff and legal counsel. The clock started over a year ago; it is unfortunate that it has come this close to a deadline. If Mr. Shea feels he can proceed, more power to him. He backs staff and legal counsel. He cannot get behind the proposed amendments. Councilmember Friedel said that he agreed with Councilmember Scharnow; they have to back staff and Mr. Arnson. He said that with the four requests, it seems like a Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 11 of 13 brand-new plan. The TCCD requires them to have nonresidential and asked if they were going to change that again. He said he cannot get behind it because of that aspect. Vice Mayor Magazine said that he was vehemently opposed to the two buildings there. Bart is a nice guy and well meaning, but he has some of the same concerns. His vision was not to have more apartments on the ground floor. He still thinks that the problem of getting commercial in there is a sign of the times. Also, he just does not like the idea of ground floor apartments. Mayor Dickey said it was mentioned that they started talking about this a year ago; the Town has not delayed anything. She said that Mr. Shea helped craft the development agreement and now he is arguing with things he does not like in it. Mr. Shea said that he is going to withdraw all the amendments. He gave the Town a full concept plan and the Town redlined it. By the Town staff taking this through this process instead of submitting his plan, it has created problems with timing. Mayor Dickey said this was the process as recommended by staff. Mr. Shea said that this is the proper procedure for an amendment to the development agreement. He timely submitted plans and received redlines, and then they stopped. Mr. Wesley said that they received the site plan application in November, just before Thanksgiving and one week later than agreed to. They agreed to get it on the February 14, 2022, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the site plan on the second Council meeting in March. Mr. Miller asked if the process would be changed if the Council either rejects one or multiple requests with the development agreement amendments. Mr. Wesley said that if the Council votes this evening to not support the amendments to the development agreement, that would take away the ground floor residential from Building E in the site plan. Mr. Shea said that it is a Catch 22. Councilmember Spelich said that the applicant just said he wants all the amendments removed, so he asked why they were voting on anything. Mr. Arnson said that, ultimately, it is up to the Council. At this time, Mr. Shea formally withdrew the request to amend the development agreement. If staff has issues with the way the site plans are done, they can redline and he will address that before they get to Planning and Zoning.   C.DISCUSSION WITH POSSIBLE DIRECTION relating to any item included in the League of Arizona Cities and Towns’ weekly Legislative Bulletin(s) or relating to any action proposed or pending before the State Legislature.       Mayor Dickey said there are two bills that authorized Prop 400, 1356 was heard yesterday and passed 9-0 out of committee. The other one is to be heard tomorrow. The bill regarding membership dues did not pass 6-4; the Town's representative voted yes. The bill prohibiting school districts and municipalities from holding mail-ballot elections passed 4-3, but was double assigned to Education. They do not think there is as good of a chance. Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 12 of 13 Vice Mayor Magazine asked about the gun legislation. Mr. Arnson said that it has not been heard yet. Mr. Miller said that SB2375, urban revenue sharing, is on the Council may wish to take a position on.   9.COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION to the TOWN MANAGER Item(s) listed below are related only to the propriety of (i) placing such item(s) on a future agenda for action, or (ii) directing staff to conduct further research and report back to the Council.   10.ADJOURNMENT    MOVED BY Councilmember David Spelich, SECONDED BY Vice Mayor Alan Magazine to adjourn.  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed - Unanimously    The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Town Council held February 1, 2022, adjourned at 8:26 p.m.     TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ____________________________ Ginny Dickey, Mayor ATTEST AND PREPARED BY: ______________________________ Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Meeting held by the Town Council of Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on the 1st day of February, 2022. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 15th day of February, 2022. _________________________________ Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk Town Council Regular Meeting of February 1, 2022 13 of 13 ITEM 7. B. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Consent Submitting Department: Public Works Prepared by: David Janover, Town Engineer Staff Contact Information: Justin Weldy, Public Works Director Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Resolution 2022-04, abandoning the entirety of a 30 foot Public Alley located within Block 1 of Fountain Hills Plat 302-A (Book 164 of maps, Page 43, MCR), adjacent to Lots 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14 and 15; including a finding of de minimis value. Staff Summary (background) Town Staff held a pre-submittal meeting with a developer that is interested in constructing an RV storage facility at 12002 N Falcon Drive.  Along the rear of this property (the west side), is a 30-foot wide public alley that runs in a north/south direction.  This alley is adjacent to Lots 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14 and 15 as shown on the attached Exhibit A. The alley runs from the south side of 12002 N Falcon Drive (Lot 3), north to E Tioga Dr. The developer of 12002 N Falcon Drive wishes to construct a second driveway entrance at the southwest corner of the property.  A driveway entrance at this location can not be constructed safely with the existing geometry of the alleys.  After a thorough review, the Town has determined that the entire 30-foot public alley that extends from E Tioga Drive on the north side, to the existing alley just south of Lots 3 and 12, is not needed, and so it may be abandoned.  The following easements will be retained over the full abandoned alley right-of-way:  Public Utility Easement Drainage Easement Since a Public Utility Easement is being maintained over the abandonment area, all utility companies have not been contacted for their approval of this abandonment. The Town sent a letter dated December 23, 2021 to all property owners having frontage on the alley to be abandoned, advising them that the Town no longer requires the alley for its use as right-of-way, and that they will each acquire 15 feet along the rear of their respective properties.  As owners, they will each be responsible for maintenance of their newly acquired property, and the Town will no longer be responsible for said maintenance.  Each of the owner letters were accompanied by an Exhibit, highlighting the portion of the alley they would be acquiring. The letters are included as an attachment to this Staff Report. State Law requires the Council to make a finding of "de minimis value" to abandon a right-of-way, so that has been included in the approval motion language. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle N/A Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of abandonment of the entirety of this public alley, subject to the following stipulation:  Retain easements as indicated in Exhibit A (Public Utility and Drainage Easements) SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to adopt Resolution 2022-04, including a finding of de minimis value. Attachments Vicinity Map  Exhibit A: Alley ROW Abandonment  Aerial Photo Map  Res. 2022-04  Owner Letters with Exhibits  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Town Clerk David Janover 01/27/2022 09:33 AM Town Engineer (Originator)David Janover 01/27/2022 09:55 AM Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Klein 01/27/2022 10:40 AM Public Works Director Justin Weldy 02/07/2022 08:08 AM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/07/2022 08:45 AM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 07:16 AM Form Started By: David Janover Started On: 01/20/2022 04:46 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  BEELI N E H W Y SHEA BLVDPALISADES BLVDSAGUARO BLVD SAGUARO BLVDPALI S A D E S B L V D PALISA D E S B L V D S A G U A R O B L V DFOUNTAIN HILLS BLVDMcDOWELL M O U N T A I N R D FOUN T AI N HI L L S B L V DSUNRIDGE DREL L A G O B L V D AVE N U E O F T H E FOU N T A I N S PANORAMA DRFIREROCK COUNTRYCLUB DRCRESTVIEW DRSIERR A M A D R E GRANDE B L V D GO L D EN E AG L E B L VD EAGLE R IDGE DR E AG L E R IDG E D R TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS NORTH SCALE: 1" = 3500'All that i s A r i z o naFOU N T A IN H I L LSTOWN OFINC. 1989TOWN HALL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SCOTTSDALEMcDOWELL MOUNTAIN PARK FORT McDOWELL YAVAPAI NATIONSALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY TOWN BOUNDARY Plat 302-A Alley R-O-W Abandonment VICINITY MAP FOUNTAIN HILLS AZ, PLAT NO. 302-A ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT EXHIBIT "A" TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT R-O-W AREA = 20,279 SF or 0.47 AC 15' NOTE: 15' 15' 15' ALLEY ABANDONMENT AREAS DEVELOPMENT SERVICESAll that is Ari zon a F O UNTAIN HILLST O W N OF INC. 1989ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAYTO BE ABANDONEDLOT 14PANORAMA DRLOT 13LOT 152021 AERIAL PHOTOFOUNTAIN HILLSARIZONA PLAT NO.302-A, BLOCK 1,LOTS1,2,3,12,13,14&15ALLEYRIGHT-OF-WAYABANDONMENTTIOGA DRFALCON DRALLEY ALLEYENTERPRISE DR ALLEY COL O N Y D R AL L E Y COLO N Y W A S H FALCON DR LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 12ALLEYRIGHT-OF-WAYABANDONMENTAREALEGEND: RESOLUTION 2022-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO A.R.S § 28-1901 ET. SEQ. ABANDONING ALL RIGHT, TITLE, OR INTEREST IT HAS IN THE 30’ PUBLIC ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED WITHIN BLOCK 1 OF FOUNTAIN HILLS PLAT 302-A, AS RECORDED IN THE BOOK 164 OF MAPS, PAGE 43 OF THE RECORDS OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER WHICH HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE NO LONGER NECESSARY RECITALS: WHEREAS, A.R.S § 28-1901 et. seq. provides for the disposition of unnecessary public roads; and WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Fountain Hills is the governing body of the Town. ENACTMENTS: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA as follows: SECTION 1. That the 30’ public alley located within Plat 302-A, Block 1, adjacent to Lots 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 14 and 15, as recorded in Book 164, Page 43, Maricopa County Recorder Records as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby declared to be no longer necessary for public use as a right-of-way. SECTION 2. That the Council determines this property can best be used to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the adjacent property owners and the citizens of the Town and therefore declares that the value of the property is de minimis and that no compensation is required from the adjacent property owners pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-1902.A.3 and § 28-1902.A.5. SECTION 3. That upon recordation of this resolution in the office of the Maricopa County Recorder, title to 15’ as depicted in Exhibit A shall vest in the owners of record of the adjacent property as determined by the records of the Maricopa County Recorder on the day of recordation, subject to the easements retained. SECTION 4. That a public utility easement and drainage easement shall be retained as shown in Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, this 15th day of February, 2022. FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO: Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2022-04 PAGE 2 REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arson, Town Attorney ITEM 7. C. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Consent                  Submitting Department: Community Services Prepared by: Linda Ayres, Recreation Manager Staff Contact Information: Rachael Goodwin, Community Services Director Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: approving a Special Event Liquor License application for the Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce for a beer garden in conjunction with the Fountain Festival of Arts and Crafts FOUNTAIN HILLS DAY  on Saturday, February MARCH 26, 2022. Staff Summary (Background) The purpose of this item is to obtain the Council's approval regarding the Special Event Liquor License application submitted by Jill Haislip, representing the Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce for submission to the Arizona Department of Liquor. The applicant and Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce are keenly aware that the final issuance of a liquor license as well as approval to hold the Fountain Hills Day on March 26, 2022, is contingent upon the state, county, and local ordinances and guidelines as it relates to public health and the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the applicant and Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce understand the Avenue of the Fountains may not be able to serve as the venue and that the Fountain Hills Day event is subject to cancellation. All special event liquor license applicants are required to submit an application and pay a $25 fee for processing. Once the fee is paid and the application is reviewed by Town staff, the application is forwarded to the Town Council for review and consideration. After the application is approved by Town Council, the applicant will bring the signed paperwork to the Arizona Department of Liquor, and be issued a physical license to be displayed for the duration of the event. The special event liquor license application was reviewed by staff for compliance with Town ordinances and staff unanimously recommends approval of the application as submitted.  Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle A.R.S. §4-203.02; 4-244; 4-261 and R19-1-228, R19-1-235, and R19-1-309 Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval. SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to approve the Special Event Liquor License Attachments Liq Lic App  G:\Special Events\Liquor Apps\2022  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Community Services Director Rachael Goodwin 02/08/2022 09:56 AM Finance Director David Pock 02/08/2022 10:17 AM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/08/2022 11:03 AM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 11:27 AM Form Started By: Linda Ayres Started On: 02/07/2022 08:08 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  ITEM 7. D. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Consent                  Submitting Department: Administration Prepared by: Kukkola Sonia, Financial Services Technician Staff Contact Information: David Pock, Finance Director Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval of Liquor License Application for Bashas' #47, located at 16605 E. Palisades Boulevard, Fountain Hills, Arizona, for a Series 9 Liquor Store license.  Staff Summary (Background) The purpose of this item is to obtain the Town Council's recommendation regarding a liquor license application submitted by Michael Joseph Basha, agent for submission to the Arizona Department of Liquor. Staff reviewed the liquor license application and found that it is in full compliance with Town ordinances. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle A.R.S.§4-201; 4-202;4-203 &4-205 and R19-1-102 and R19-1-311. Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of the liquor license application. SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to approve a series #9 liquor license application for Bashas' #47. Attachments Department Recommendation  Application  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Director David Pock 02/08/2022 11:02 AM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/08/2022 11:03 AM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 11:26 AM Form Started By: Kukkola Sonia Started On: 02/08/2022 09:29 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE MEMO TO:(as applicable) Streets Division Fire Department Building Division Community Services Development Services Law Enforcement Licensing DATE:2/7/22 FR:Sonia Kukkola, Financial Services Technician RE:Liquor License Application Attached is a Liquor License Application for staff review. Review the application, then mark or sign, indicating staff’s recommendation for approval (with or without stipulations) or denial. If staff’s recommendation is to deny and/or there are stipulations for approval, please attach a memo that specifies the reasoning and the memo will be forwarded on to the Town Council for their consideration of this application. Name of Organization: BASHAS’ #47, 16605 E. Palisades Boulevard Fountain Hills AZ 85268 Applicant: Michael Bashas Date(s) of Event: N/A Date Application Received: 12/23/21 Town Council Agenda Date: 2/15/22 STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION: Department/Division Staff Member Approved Denied N/A P & Z John Wesley X Community Services Linda Ayres X Peter Johnson Building Safety X Fire Department Dave Ott X Law Enforcement Larry Kratzer X Licensing Sonia Kukkola X Street Department Jeff Pierce X Attach report for denial or any recommendation requiring stipulations. ITEM 7. E. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Consent                  Submitting Department: Community Services Prepared by: Linda Ayres, Recreation Manager Staff Contact Information: Rachael Goodwin, Community Services Director Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION:  approving a Special Event Liquor License application for Valors on 8th for a beer garden in conjunction with the Mountain 2 Fountain on March 6, 2022. Staff Summary (Background) The purpose of this item is to obtain the Council's approval regarding the Special Event Liquor License application submitted by Romaldo Gonzalez, representing the Valors on 8th for submission to the Arizona Department of Liquor.    The applicant and Valors on 8th wish to obtain Council approval for the liquor license application as an administrative step, in anticipation of the Arizona Department of Liquor License and Control resuming this service and understands issuance of special event liquor licenses may not resume prior to the event date of March 6, 2022.   All special event liquor license applicants are required to submit an application and pay a $25 fee for processing.  Once the fee is paid and the application is reviewed by Town staff, the application is forwarded to the Town Council for review and consideration. After the application is approved by Town Council, the applicant will bring the signed paperwork to the Arizona Department of Liquor, and be issued a physical license to be displayed for the duration of the event. The special event liquor license application was reviewed by staff for compliance with Town ordinances and staff unanimously recommends approval of the application as submitted.     Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle A.R.S. §4-203.02; 4-244; 4-261 and R19-1-228, R19-1-235, and R19-1-309 Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A  Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval. SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to approve the Special Event Liquor License Attachments Application  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Community Services Director Rachael Goodwin 02/09/2022 02:33 PM Finance Director David Pock 02/09/2022 02:48 PM Town Attorney Elizabeth A. Klein 02/10/2022 09:25 AM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/10/2022 10:45 AM Form Started By: Linda Ayres Started On: 02/09/2022 02:12 PM Final Approval Date: 02/10/2022  ITEM 8. A. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Regular Agenda Submitting Department: Development Services Prepared by: John Wesley, Development Services Director Staff Contact Information: John Wesley, Development Services Director Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Regarding Ordinance 21-17, amending Chapter 10, Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts, Section 10.04, General Provisions, to add design standards for single-family dwellings. Staff Summary (Background) February 15, 2022, Update The Council held the public hearing and discussed this item at the regular meeting on January 18.  Prior to the meeting Dennis Brown raised a few concerns regarding the proposal, but was unable to attend the meeting for further discussion.  The Council voted to continue the hearing to their February 15, 2022, meeting to allow staff the opportunity to talk to Mr. Brown about his concerns and propose modifications, if necessary, to address those concerns. Staff met with Mr. Brown and reviewed his concern.  He was able to point out situations where a legitimate single-family home would have more than one 2-car garage and both would need to face the street due to lot configuration and slope issues.  As an alternative, staff agreed to provide Council with an amended ordinance that removes the specific requirements regarding the garage doors and front doors facing the street and amend the wording in the provision regarding mirror images to include these items.  By doing so the intent is still there way giving more flexibility to review a specific design to see if the placement and design of the garages and front doors are creating an issue. Both the original and revised ordinances are attached for Council consideration.  Mr. Brown suggested that regardless of which ordinance is approved, that staff monitor what is being reviewed and approved and provide a report back to Council in a year to see if any modifications should be made. Original Staff Report On several occasions over the last few months staff has received building permit plans for single-family homes that look a lot like duplexes.  These homes give the appearance of a duplex from the street and could very easily be modified to turn them into a duplex.  Because they met all the technical requirements of the zoning ordinance and building codes as single-family dwellings, staff had to approve the applications.  Because the property is zoned for single-family uses they could not legally be converted to a duplex use, but it could be very tempting to do so without proper permits.  Regardless of the actual use, the buildings give an appearance as a duplex in the neighborhood which could negatively impact other properties in the area. In one case, the neighbors in the area became aware of the design and were significantly concerned about the issues listed above.  They were concerned about how the dwelling would actually be used and that homes could be built on other vacant lots in the area that would also look like duplexes instead of single-family homes.  They brought their concerns to staff and staff agreed to look at possible ordinance amendments to address the concerns. Staff and the Council have recently been supportive of allowing second kitchens in single-family homes to accommodate a variety of living styles including "mother-in-law" quarters, and guest houses.  This brings with it, however, the opportunity for abuse to convert a home to a duplex and/or take advantage of vacation rental allowances. The Fountain Hills General Plan 2020 has three goals with related policies that support the need to protect and maintain existing neighborhoods.  These statements are:  Thriving Neighborhoods Goals and Policies Goal 1:  Continue to develop and maintain thriving neighborhoods. Policy 2:  Protect existing neighborhoods from incompatible development that does not support the character of that area. Goal 2:  Support a housing strategy that encourages a broad range of quality housing types to address current and future housing needs and to support long-term vitality. Policy 6:  Support quality residential development that meets Town housing needs, promotes vitality of established neighborhoods, and enhances the quality of life in Fountain Hills. Policy 7:  Provide various regulatory and financial incentives to encourage well designed housing, special needs housing, and housing affordable to households of different income levels. Goal 3:  Maintain the quality of existing neighborhoods. Policy 1:  Protect established single-family residential neighborhoods from the transition, intensification, and encroachment of uses that detract and/or change the character of the residential neighborhood.    Given the concerns, staff investigated how cities and towns define single-family dwellings and looked for existing single-family residential design standards that could be put in place to help reduce the opportunity to design and build a home that looks like a duplex on the outside and is easily converted to one on the inside.  In review of definitions, staff did not find any definitions used by other communities that are significantly different from our current definition.  Regarding design standards, staff did not find any that address the issue at hand.  The ones we could find were directed to ensure a high-quality design aesthetic, particularly along a street, not to making sure a single-family home did not look like or function like a duplex. The primary exterior features of a dwelling that can make it look like something other than a single-family home are the number and placement of garage doors, the number and placement of "front" doors to the home, and if the two sides of the front of the home are mirror images of each other.  Staff has addressed these concerns in the design standards by including provisions to allow no more than one two-car wide garage door or one front door to face the street in front of the property and encouraging that mirror images not be used.  Sections 10.04 B. 1 , 2, and 3 addresses these concerns.  Section 10.04 B. 1 addresses garage design. If two or more 2-car-wide garages are proposed, only one can directly face the front street.  All others will need to be located to not be directly visible from the front street thus reducing both the "garage-scape" appearance along the street and the possible perception of a duplex design. Section 10.04 B. 2 addresses the front door concern.  It is certainly possible for homes to have more than one entry along the front of the home, particularly for homes with front casitas or guest quarters.  To still allow this, but reduce the possible appearance as being a duplex with two equal front doors, this section requires at least one of the doors to be located so it is not immediately visible from the front street. Section 10.04 B. 3 states "the front facade of the dwelling should not include mirror images of each half of the building."  Using the word "should" instead of "must" expresses the intent in context of the rest of the section while still allowing the mirror design if it is not contributing to a duplex appearance. The primary concerns on the interior of the building are allowing more than one full-size kitchen and ensuring the interior functions as one dwelling; does not have segments that can be totally walled off from the remainder of the dwelling.  Sections 10.04 B. 4 and 5 address these concerns.  Section 10.04 B. 4 provides a limitation on the size of secondary kitchens to keep there from being two full-sized kitchens.  While there could be some ambiguity in which countertops are really part of the kitchen, we believe it will be clear in most cases and staff can work with an applicant in a given situation to make that determination.  Staff is open to adjustment to the allowance for the amount of secondary food preparation areas.  Staff suggested 50% and the Planning and Zoning Commission has kept that number. Section 10.04 B. 5 addresses the concern of the floor plan being one that is easily modified so that interior walls separate the interior into two separately functioning dwelling units.  While this would not be legal in a single-family district anyway, this adds extra emphasis to review the design for features that make it possible. Section 10.04 C adds a comprehensive approach to determining if a proposed dwelling should be considered a single-family home and allows staff to not approve a permit for a home if it does not comply with these requirements.  If a dwelling is designed to with more than one "distinct" living area, it cannot be approved if the design includes at least six of the following eight items:  Bedroom(s)1. 3/4 or larger bathroom(s)2. Laundry room3. Kitchen or area for food preparation4. Separate water heater5. Separate, direct access from the front side of the property or the garage 6. Separate HVAC system with thermostats7. Electrical service from subpanels are aligned with the distinct living areas of the dwelling.8. Section 10.04 C also contains to exceptions to the basic rule.  One is for approved guest houses which are accessory units and would not be considered under these provisions, and the other is for "in-law" suites in a home when those suites are less than 30% of the size of the dwelling.   Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle General Plan 2020 Thriving Neighborhoods Goals 1 and 3 Zoning Ordinance Section 1.12 definitions of dwellings Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, General Provisions Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10, Single-family Residential Districts Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this proposed ordinance at two meetings, September 8 and December 13, 2021.  Based on their review several modifications were made to the draft ordinance.  A member of the public provided comments and support for the proposed amendment.  The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously at their December 13 meeting to recommend approval of the ordinance. Staff Recommendation(s) Cities and towns have generally been reluctant to place significant design standards on single-family homes.  With changing markets and design ideas, there is a need to take steps as necessary, however, to ensure to the degree we can that homes built in single-residence neighborhoods will maintain the standards of those neighborhoods. Staff believes the standards being proposed provide the balance between allowing freedom in design of single-family homes while giving some additional standards and tools for staff to use in review of plans.  Staff supports the recommendation for approval of this text amendment. Update:  Staff can support either the original ordinance or the revised ordinance based on input from Mr. Brown. SUGGESTED MOTION Motion to approve Ordinance #21-17, specifying either the original ordinance or the revised ordinance. Attachments Revised Ordinance  P&Z Recommended Ordinance  Example Plans  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Development Services Director (Originator)John Wesley 02/01/2022 11:00 AM Form Started By: John Wesley Started On: 01/26/2022 05:00 PM Final Approval Date: 02/01/2022  ORDINANCE NO. 21-17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 10, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: R1-190, R1-43, R1-35, R1-35H, R1-18, R1-10, R1-10A, R1-8, R1-8A, R1-6, R1-6A, MODIFYING SECTION 10.04, GENERAL PROVISIONS BY ADDING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 93-22 on November 18, 1993, which adopted the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to amend Chapter 10, Single-family Residential Districts, Section 10.04, General Provisions by adding specific requirements for the design of single-family dwellings; and WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to implement the goals and policies of the Fountain Hills General Plan 2020 with regards to protecting existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-462.04, public hearings regarding this o rdinance were advertised in the October 20 th and 27th and November 3rd, 2021, and the December 29th, 2021 and January 5th, 2022 editions of the Fountain Hills Times; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on November 8, and December 13, 2021, and by the Town Council on January 18, 2022. WHEREAS, in accordance with Article II, Sections 1 and 2, Constitution of Arizona, and the laws of the State of Arizona, the Town Council has considered the individual property rights and personal liberties of the residents of the Town and the probable impact of the proposed ordinance on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent before adopting this ordinance. ENACTMENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 10, Single-family Residential Districts: R1-190, R1-43, R1-35, R1-35H, R1-18, R1-10, R1-10A, R1-8, R1-8A, R1-6, R1- 6A, Section 10.04, General Provisions, is hereby amended to add the following definition: A. The General Provisions in Chapter 5 herein shall apply. B. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT HOMES BEING BUILT IN SINGLE-FAMILY ZONED NEIGHBORHOODS QUALIFY TO BE CONSIDERED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL APPLY. 1. THE FRONT FAÇADE OF THE DWELLING SHOULD NOT INCLUDE MIRROR IMAGES OF EACH HALF OF THE BUILDING, ESPECIALLY WITH THE PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION OF MULTIPLE 2-CAR GARAGES AND POINTS OF ENTRY. 2. KITCHENS. IF A DWELLING UNIT INCLUDES MORE THAN ONE AREA INDOORS FOR THE PREPARATION OF FOOD (A KITCHEN), ONE KITCHEN MUST BE DESIGNATED ON THE BUILDING PLANS AS THE PRIMARY KITCHEN AND THE TOTAL COUNTERTOP AREA, INCLUDING ISLANDS, DEVOTED TO OTHER INDOOR AREA(S) FOR PREPARATION OF FOOD CAN BE NO MORE THAN HALF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COUNTERTOP AREA IN THE DESIGNATED PRIMARY KITCHEN. 3. FLOOR PLAN, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED FOR GUEST HOUSES. ALL CONDITIONED SPACE WITHIN THE DWELLING MUST BE FULLY ACCESSIBLE FROM ALL OTHER AREAS WITHIN THE DWELLING WITHOUT HAVING TO GO OUTSIDE. NO FIRE RATED WALLS CAN SEPARATE ONE PART OF THE DWELLING FROM ANOTHER. C. A PLAN FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING SHALL NOT BE APPROVED AS A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING: 1. IF IT IS DESIGNED WITH MORE THAN ONE DISTINCT LIVING AREA WHEN EACH AREA CONTAINS AT LEAST SIX OF THE FOLLOWING: a. BEDROOM(S) b. ¾ OR LARGER BATHROOM(S) c. LAUNDRY ROOM d. KITCHEN OR AREA FOR FOOD PREPARATION e. SEPARATE WATER HEATER f. SEPARATE, DIRECT ACCESS FROM 1. THE FRONT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, OR 2. THE GARAGE g. SEPARATE HVAC SYSTEM WITH THERMOSTATS h. ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM SUBPANELS ARE ALIGNED WITH THE DISTINCT LIVING AREAS OF THE DWELLING. 2. THE ABOVE LIMITATION SHALL NOT APPLY TO a. GUEST HOUSES MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF LARGE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, OR b. DESIGNS WHEN ONE OF THE LIVING AREAS IS LESS THAN 30% OF THE SIZE OF THE LIVABLE AREA OF THE DWELLING UNIT. SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 15th day of February, 2022. FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO: Ginny Dicky, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 21-17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 10, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: R1-190, R1-43, R1-35, R1-35H, R1-18, R1-10, R1-10A, R1-8, R1-8A, R1-6, R1-6A, MODIFYING SECTION 10.04, GENERAL PROVISIONS BY ADDING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Town Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 93-22 on November 18, 1993, which adopted the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fountain Hills (the “Zoning Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to amend Chapter 10, Single-family Residential Districts, Section 10.04, General Provisions by adding specific requirements for the design of single-family dwellings; and WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to implement the goals and policies of the Fountain Hills General Plan 2020 with regards to protecting existing neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance and pursuant to ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 9-462.04, public hearings regarding this o rdinance were advertised in the October 20 th and 27th and November 3rd, 2021 editions of the Fountain Hills Times; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Fountain Hills Planning & Zoning Commission on November 8, 2021, and by the Town Council on December 7, 2021. WHEREAS, in accordance with Article II, Sections 1 and 2, Constitution of Arizona, and the laws of the State of Arizona, the Town Council has considered the individual property rights and personal liberties of the residents of the Town and the probable impact of the proposed ordinance on the cost to construct housing for sale or rent before adopting this ordinance. ENACTMENTS: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS as follows: SECTION 1. The recitals above are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 10, Single-family Residential Districts: R1-190, R1-43, R1-35, R1-35H, R1-18, R1-10, R1-10A, R1-8, R1-8A, R1-6, R1- 6A, Section 10.04, General Provisions, is hereby amended to add the following definition: A. The General Provisions in Chapter 5 herein shall apply. B. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT HOMES BEING BUILT IN SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS QUALIFY TO BE CONSIDERED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL APPLY. 1. GARAGE DESIGN AND ORIENTATION. a. 3-CAR-WIDE GARAGES. WHERE A THREE-CAR-WIDE GARAGE IS UTILIZED, AT LEAST ONE (1) GARAGE DOOR MUST BE OFFSET FROM THE OTHER TWO (2) BY A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST TWO (2) FEET AND SET AT LEAST TWO (2) FEET IN FRONT OF OR BEHIND THE PLANE OF THE OTHER TWO (2) GARAGE DOORS. b. 4-CAR OR MORE GARAGES. WHERE GARAGE SPACE IS PROVIDED THAT HAS FOUR OR MORE VEHICLE PARKING SPACES, NO MORE THAN ONE (1), TWO-CAR-WIDE GARAGE DOOR MAY BE PLACED SO AS TO BE ORIENTED TO THE FRONT STREET. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED ABOVE FOR A THREE-CAR-WIDE GARAGE, ALL OTHER GARAGE DOORS MUST BE ORIENTED SO AS TO NOT BE DIRECTLY VISIBLE FROM THE FRONT STREET. 2. FRONT ENTRY. NO MORE THAN ONE RECOGNIZED ACCESS TO THE HOME IS ALLOWED ALONG THE FRONT STREET. IF ADDITIONAL ENTRIES ARE PROVIDED THEY MUST BE DESIGNED AND LOCATED SO AS TO NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THE FRONT STREET, WHILE STILL PROVIDING SAFE ACCESS TO THE HOME. 3. KITCHENS. IF A DWELLING UNIT INCLUDES MORE THAN ONE AREA INDOORS FOR THE PREPARATION OF FOOD (A KITCHEN), ONE KITCHEN MUST BE DESIGNATED ON THE BUILDING PLANS AS THE PRIMARY KITCHEN AND THE TOTAL COUNTERTOP AREA, INCLUDING ISLANDS, DEVOTED TO OTHER INDOOR AREA(S) FOR PREPARATION OF FOOD CAN BE NO MORE THAN HALF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COUNTERTOP AREA IN THE DESIGNATED PRIMARY KITCHEN. 4. FLOOR PLAN, EXCEPT AS ALLOWED FOR GUEST HOUSES. ALL CONDITIONED SPACE WITHIN THE DWELLING MUST BE FULLY ACCESSIBLE FROM ALL OTHER AREAS WITHIN THE DWELLING WITHOUT HAVING TO GO OUTSIDE. NO FIRE RATED WALLS CAN SEPARATE ONE PART OF THE DWELLING FROM ANOTHER. C. EXCEPT AS ALLOWED FOR GUEST HOUSES, A PLAN FOR A SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING SHALL NOT BE APPROVED AS A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING IF IT IS DESIGNED WITH MORE THAN ONE DISTINCT LIVING AREA WHEN EACH AREA CONTAINS AT LEAST FIVE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. BEDROOM(S) 2. ¾ OR LARGER BATHROOM(S) 3. KITCHEN OR AREA FOR FOOD PREPARATION 4. SEPARATE WATER HEATER 5. SEPARATE, DIRECT ACCESS FROM a. THE FRONT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, OR b. THE GARAGE 6. SEPARATE HVAC SYSTEM WITH THERMOSTATS SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Fountain Hills, Arizona, this 7th day of December, 2021. FOR THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS: ATTESTED TO: Ginny Dickey, Mayor Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk REVIEWED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Grady E. Miller, Town Manager Aaron D. Arnson, Town Attorney ITEM 8. B. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Regular Agenda                  Submitting Department: Community Services Prepared by: Rachael Goodwin, Community Services Director Staff Contact Information: Rachael Goodwin, Community Services Director Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION: Community Center and Special Event Fee Waiver Policy. Staff Summary (Background) Community Center Background and Recommendations The Community Center is a facility that offers space for a multitude of community programs. It serves as a recreation center, senior service center, meeting facility, performance venue, event space, exhibit hall, and more. Many local and regional groups use the facility as their hub, hosting meetings, social gatherings, etc. Over time, the number of waived rentals within the facility has increased, through expanded scope of the users or increased time requested for events. This increased demand has placed a burden on the resources of the community center including operational staff time, space availability, as well as direct costs incurred.  After staff review, the following policy options are recommended:   All Fountain Hills based non-profit groups are eligible for a 50% fee reduction from the established residential/non-profit rates. A/V equipment will be available for local non-profit group use at no additional cost. Classroom space will be reservable after 2pm on weekdays and must adhere to the Community Center hours of operation. Reservation start and end times must be accounted for in their entirety, including any pre- or post-time necessary for set up, clean up, catering needs, etc.   Weekend reservations require a minimum of two ballrooms with a minimum of four-hour rental time  Reservations can be made up to six months in advance and are subject to availability.  Proof of non-profit status will be required for all groups seeking fee reductions.  It is recognized that many groups will be impacted by these changes and staff will make every attempt to work with our user groups to ensure a well-informed transitions process. Staff will work with groups to help minimize disruptions to the dates and times they have traditionally held. In some exceptional circumstances, programs that serve an altruistic, essential mission or enhance the programs offered within the community center will be permitted at no cost. Use Agreement Exceptions: The long-standing relationship between the Fountain Hills Civic and Cultural Association (FHCCA) and the Town are important to note. While User Agreements should be limited to exceptional circumstances, the numerous partnership programs that exist between the Town and FHCCA make this an appropriate option. It is recommended that an agreement be drafted that outline a mutually beneficial use plan that identifies partner programs (such as the Dark Skies Festival and Bingo), reduces weekend ballrooms use to two complimentary weekends, and limits weekday use to off-peak hours after 4pm.   Special Events Background and Recommendations Special Events Background and Recommendations Special events are a beloved part of the Fountain Hills community. Events serve as a gathering point as well as a tourism draw for the community. However, events within town parks and downtown area are costly in terms of staff time, resources, and impact. Extensive preparation work, as well as clean up efforts, often fall to staff to ensure the public spaces are ready for daily use following events. Fees for use of public spaces are just a portion of the financial burden of producing events. Costs for road closures including MCSO deputies, electrical and water access, damage to turf, roadways and above/ below grade infrastructure are other costs that are often absorbed by the town. Special events bring value and positive impacts to the community, however, fee waivers should be considered only in rare circumstances. The following recommendations are offered for Town Council consideration in an effort to provide a uniform set of guidelines regarding requests for Town resources and associated rental fees:  All Fountain Hills based non-profit groups are eligible for a 50% fee reduction from the established residential/non-profit rates.  Fees for direct costs including MCSO support, road closure implementation, logistic items such as restrooms, lights, fencing, etc., are not eligible for waivers.   Reservation start and end times must be accounted for in their entirety, including any pre- or post-time necessary for set up or clean up, vendor set up, logistic deliveries, etc.  All events, regardless of fee waivers, must submit a Special Event Application for review. The application must meet all Town requirements including established deadlines, layout plans, insurance certificates, traffic control plans, etc.  Town permit fees or damage deposits are not eligible for fee waivers. Proof of 501-C3 status will be required for all organizations requesting fee reductions.  As with the Community Center, it is recognized that many groups will be impacted by these changes and staff will work with user groups to ensure understanding of the fee waiver policy.  Use Agreement Exceptions: Assuming the Town Council agrees with the staff recommended Fee Waiver Policy, the previous Fee Waiver Policy encompassing "Legacy Events" will no longer apply.  This will impact the Fountain Festival of Arts and Crafts, The Fine Arts and Craft Show and the Oktoberfest, all of which are produced by the Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce. Because this exception basis will no longer apply, a separate User Agreement is recommended to be drafted between the Town and the Chamber.  The user agreement will outline in-kind services provided to the community by the Chamber of Commerce and other related programs to demonstrate the value of these in relation to the value of the fee waivers.  This is similar to the direction recommended in regard to local youth sports leagues and the FHCCA.  The Chamber of Commerce User agreement shall include an outline of mutually beneficial partnership programs, events and services provided by both organizations and their associated monetary value.  Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle Naming Rights and Sponsorship Policy Risk Analysis Fee waivers for the Community Center and Special Events space create direct and indirect costs not allocated for within departmental budgets and potential equity and fairness issues for different user groups that pay different user fees for the same level of services. Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) NA Staff Recommendation(s) Staff seeks Council approval of the recommended policy guidelines relating to the Community Center and Special Events.  SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to direct staff to develop a final draft of the Fee Waiver Policy with the policy direction received from the Town Council. Attachments Sponsorship and Naming Rights Policy 2016  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Community Services Director Rachael Goodwin 02/03/2022 05:41 PM Finance Director David Pock 02/04/2022 07:34 AM Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson 02/04/2022 07:58 AM Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/04/2022 10:31 AM Form Started By: Patti Lopuszanski Started On: 01/19/2022 12:47 PM Final Approval Date: 02/04/2022  ITEM 8. C. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS STAFF REPORT    Meeting Date: 02/15/2022 Meeting Type: Town Council Regular Meeting Agenda Type: Regular Agenda                  Submitting Department: Administration Prepared by: Elizabeth A. Klein, Town Clerk Staff Contact Information: Request to Town Council Regular Meeting (Agenda Language):  DISCUSSION WITH POSSIBLE DIRECTION relating to any item included in the League of Arizona Cities and Towns’ weekly Legislative Bulletin(s) or relating to any action proposed or pending before the State Legislature. Staff Summary (Background) This is a regularly recurring agenda item on the Town Council agenda during the legislative session.  The goal of this agenda item is to obtain consensus from the Mayor and Council on legislative bills and to provide direction, if any, to staff to communicate the Town's position on the bills.  Each Council meeting the Legislative Bulletin will be attached to the Town Council agenda which will include legislative analyses of the bills and their impacts on municipalities.  The Mayor and Council will have an opportunity to review the bills that are under consideration in the Arizona State Legislature and provide direction on supporting or opposing the bills.  The Mayor and Council may also bring up other bills of interest to the Town of Fountain Hills for discussion that are not listed in the Legislative Bulletin.   Last November the Town Council approved the 2022 Legislative Policy Agenda which identified the major legislative priorities of the Town Council. The 2022 Legislative Policy Agenda document and the current League's Legislative Bulletins will also be attached to the staff reports going forward during the 2022 Legislative Session. Related Ordinance, Policy or Guiding Principle Council adopted 2022 Legislative Policy Agenda Risk Analysis N/A Recommendation(s) by Board(s) or Commission(s) N/A  Staff Recommendation(s) N/A SUGGESTED MOTION MOVE to provide staff direction on one or more bills being considered by the State Legislature. Attachments 2022 Legislative Policy Agenda  Issue 3  Issue 4  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Town Manager Grady E. Miller 02/08/2022 10:55 AM Form Started By: Elizabeth A. Klein Started On: 02/08/2022 08:18 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2022  1 2022 State Legislative Agenda The Town Council of Fountain Hills Prepared by Jack W Lunsford The Lunsford Group 2 Mission To enrich and provide an active quality of life for all residents and visitors through proactive community engagement, resolute stewardship of amenities and open spaces, and the enhancement of the overall health and well-being of our town. Strategic Priorities The Fountain Hills Strategic Plan is based on the following key goals or strategic priorities: Maximizing Economic Development Opportunities in Fountain Hills o Ensuring that Infrastructure in Fountain Hills is Well-Maintained and Safe o Attracting Families and Working Professionals o Ensuring that Fountain Hills Finances are Stable and Sustainable o Focusing on Strengthening the Community and Improving the Town’s Quality of Life 2022 Legislative Resolutions League of Arizona Cities and Towns (Endorsed and Supported)  AMEND state statute to specify a period when cities and towns may prohibit the use of permissible fireworks and modify definitions of illegal and permissible fireworks.  AMEND statute to allow cities and towns to amend their budgets after the initial budget has passes while following notice and hearing statutes and with strong oversight and approval requirements.  SEEK legislative and/or non-legislative solutions, working with housing and homeless advocates, the Department of Housing, and state legislators, to provide local governments, regional partners, and continuum of care providers additional resources to combat street homelessness in our communities.  SIMPLIFY the statutory mechanisms to dissolve water and wastewater districts once an area incorporates or gets annexed to relieve the tax burden on the citizens, if the town or town provides the same service that had been performed by the district, or the district service is no longer needed. 3 Town of Fountain Hills 2022 State Legislative Agenda CORE PRINCIPLES Preserve Local Funding PROTECT State-Shared Revenues – Arizona voters have prohibited municipalities from collecting a local income tax and luxury taxes and, in exchange, have authorized the establishment of an urban revenue-sharing distribution of state income taxes to municipal governments. Currently that percentage is 15%, however in 2021 the Legislature passed SB1828 which increased revenue-share percentage to 18%, effective in fiscal year 2023-2024. SB1828 is now on hold pending a final ruling from the Arizona Supreme Court as to the constitutionality of this and other 2021 legislative actions and, depending on the outcome, this could put pressure on the Arizona Legislature to revisit the provisions of the new law. Preserve Local Control OPPOSE Preemption of Local Authority – The Town strives to preserve local control so that its citizens can self-govern in their best interest. Every legislative session legislation is proposed that creates unfunded mandates on cities and towns and/or preempts the ability of municipal councils to set policy through ordinances and regulations at the local level which are in the best interest of their citizens and taxpayers. Often times this is a “one-size-fits-all” legislative approach that doesn’t consider the differences in municipalities or the priorities of the residents. Such efforts should be opposed. 2021 Key Positions  PRESERVE the current minimum urban revenue sharing percentage for cities and towns at 15%.  OPPOSE legislation to modify or expand legislative authority to seek SB1487 investigations by legislators pertinent to municipal authorities and to expand any applicable penalties.  SUPPORT legislation addressing the negative impacts short-term rental properties can have on adjacent properties and neighborhoods.  SUPPORT legislation that at a minimum will prohibit, on all days, the use of permissible consumer fireworks between the hours of 10:00 PM and 8:00 AM. 4 LEGISLATIVE POLICY STATEMENTS LOCAL GOVERNMENT  OPPOSE legislation to modify or expand legislative authority to seek SB1487 investigations by legislators pertinent to municipal authorit y and to expand any penalties.  SUPPORT legislation that further limits SB1487 provisions.  OPPOSE legislation that creates unfunded mandates for municipalities.  SUPPORT legislation on political signs to comply with Reed v. Town of Gilbert U.S. Supreme Court decision. LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE  OPPOSE legislation that reduces or negatively impacts the collection of transaction privilege tax (TPT), State Shared Revenues, or other local revenues.  OPPOSE changing the imposition of construction sales taxes to “materials only” or other methods that do not equitably return those revenues to where the construction activity occurs. NEIGHBORHOODS and QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUES  SUPPORT legislation providing additional tools and remedies for municipalities to regulate short-term rentals in their communities.  OPPOSE legislation that would limit or curtail the Town’s current zoning authority, particularly in residential areas.  OPPOSE legislation that would prohibit or eliminate the transaction privilege tax on the renting or leasing of real property for residential purposes.  OPPOSE legislation that preempts a city or town from establishing or enforcing its ordinances regulating tobacco, vapor, or alternative nicotine products. 5 PUBLIC SAFETY  OPPOSE legislation that negatively impacts the Town’s Fire Code or its ability to enforce its Fire Code provisions.  OPPOSE legalizing additional fireworks or other changes that would increase the risk of fires to businesses, neighborhoods, residents and the McDowell Mountain Preserve.  PRESERVE local control authority that allows cities and towns to regulate the use and discharge of firearms within municipal boundaries. TRANSPORTATION  SUPPORT extension of ½-cent sales tax to support regional transportation projects in Maricopa County.  SUPPORT the continued viability of Highway Users Revenue Fund (HURF) funding to cities and towns. 1 Issue 3 Legislative Update: Today is the 19th day of the session and so far 1,309 bills and 101 memorials have been introduced. The deadline for senators to introduce bills is Monday at 5 p.m., while representatives have until Feb. 7 to drop bills in the hopper. Common themes in legislation this year include election related measures, COVID-19 vaccine and mask preemptions for private businesses and public employers, funding for infrastructure, and criminal justice reform. With only three weeks left to hear bills in the chamber of origin in committees, hearing agendas are already populating – setting the stage for busy weeks ahead for lawmakers, staff and stakeholders. Meeting Capacity Requirements HB 2070 open meetings; capacity; posting; violation sponsored by Representative John Kavanagh (R-Fountain Hills) would require public bodies to provide for a reasonable amount of seating to accommodate anticipated attendance of individuals wishing to attend hearings. The bill additionally requires agendas to include the location to physically access the meeting. The head of a public body that violates the requirement could be subject to civil penalties for the violation. The League is supportive of increasing access and participation of the public, however, we are concerned that the bill may unintentionally preclude remote or call-in options currently provided to the public. We have additional concerns that volunteers serving on local boards or commissions may now be subject to a civil penalty. The League will work with the sponsor to address our concerns and bring clarity for cities and towns. Vaccine Employer Liability On Wednesday, the House Judiciary committee considered HB 2043 employer liability; COVID-19 vaccine requirement. The measure stipulates that if an employer denies a religious exemption and requires a person to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as a prerequisite for obtaining or requirement for maintaining employment the employer is liable for damages that result from a significant that is caused by receiving the COVID- 19 vaccine. Under the bill, claimants that prevail must be awarded $500,000 in damages. The League opposed the bill in committee because we are concerned about the liability provisions. Additionally, the bill could subject taxpayers to pay for unsubstantiated injury claims when the "significant injury" could have been caused by other factors unrelated to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. The measure is also opposed by a number of local chambers of commerce on behalf of private employers. HB 2043 passed out of committee be a 6-4 party-line vote. Fireworks A League resolution related to fireworks is scheduled for committee hearing s in both chambers next week. HB 2226 (fireworks; use; overnight hours; prohibition), sponsored by Representative Amish Shah (D-Phoenix) and its mirror, SB 1275, sponsored by 2 Senator JD Mesnard (R-Chandler), would allow cities and towns to prohibit consumable fireworks between 11 p.m. and 8 a.m. on all days, with exceptions for the morning of New Year's Day and the morning following the Fourth of July. If passed, this much needed measure will peel back the preemptive language in current statue and will provide cities and towns an additional tool to address residents’ concerns. HB 2226 is scheduled for a hearing in the House Military and Public Safety committee on Monday afternoon. SB 1275 is scheduled for the Senate Commerce committee on Wednesday afternoon. Local Budget HB 2375 urban revenue sharing; public safety sponsored by Representative Regina Cobb (R-Kingman) would require that Urban Revenue Sharing (URS) dollars only be used to fund public safety services beginning in FY24. Under the measure, if a city or town used state shared revenue for any purpose other than public safety, the state treasurer is required to withhold an amount equal to those expenditures from the city or town in the following fiscal year. While public safety costs account for a large part of municipal budgets, the bill could penalize cities and towns that currently rely on a fire district for services or on the county sheriff’s office for police. The bill is scheduled for a hearing in the House Ways & Means committee on Wednesday morning, the League will be opposing the measure. 2022 Session Timeline Every session has deadlines pertaining to bill submissions and hearings. This year, the schedule is as follows: January 1/10 – First day of session 1/13 – House 7-bill Introduction Limit Begins (5 p.m.) 1/31 - Senate bill introduction deadline (5 p.m.) February 2/7 – House Bill Introduction Deadline (5 p.m.) 2/14 - 2/18 – Last week to hear bills in the chamber of origin March 3/21 – 3/25 – Last week to hear bills in the opposing chamber April 4/15 – Last Day for Conference Committees 4/19 – 100th Day of Session 1 Issue 4 Legislative Update: Today is day 26 of the legislative session. To date, 1,536 bills and 115 memorials have been introduced. Lawmakers in the House have until Monday at 5 pm to introduce new bills. Except for the Appropriations Committee, there are two more weeks to consider bills in the chamber of origin. Committee agendas will be packed with bills for the next few weeks as members make the last strides to get bills in motion. ACTION ALERT - By-Right Zoning HB 2674 municipal zoning; by right housing sponsored by Representatives Steve Kaiser (R-Phoenix) and Cesar Chavez (D-Phoenix) is a broad measure that would have significant impacts on municipal zoning authority. Please reach out to the members of the House Commerce Committee and ask them to reject this measure. House Commerce Committee Members Chairman Jeff Weninger jweninger@azleg.gov (602) 926-3092 Vice-Chairman Joseph Chaplik jchaplik@azleg.gov (602) 926-3436 Rep. Neal Carter ncarter@azleg.gov (602) 926-5761 Rep. Cesar Chavez cchavez@azleg.gov (602) 926-4862 Rep. David Cook dcook@azleg.gov (602) 926-5162 Rep. Diego Espinoza despinoza@azleg.gov (602) 926-3134 Rep. Steve Kaiser skaiser@azleg.gov (602) 926-3314 Rep. Sarah Liguori sliguori@azleg.gov (602) 926-3300 Rep. Robert Meza rmeza@azleg.gov (602) 926-3425 Rep. Justin Wilmeth jwilmeth@azleg.gov (602) 926-5044 If passed, the measure would allow by-right development of eight single-family dwelling units per acre and 12 two-family dwelling units per acre in any existing agricultural district, single-family residential district, and an area designated by the general plan as supporting single-family dwellings. Single-family, two-family, and multi-family units would be allowed "by right" with no rezoning required so long as it is located in any commercial or mixed- use district. HB 2674 additionally would allow multi-family residential structures in all existing agricultural and residential zones and in all zones where multi-family is currently allowed, with a density equal to the highest density within one mile. The measure does not consider the potential impacts on local infrastructure such as transportation, water, sewer, and electrical generation facilities. Additionally, the bill circumvents voter-approved general plans and makes public input moot because a municipality would have no discretion to deny approval of projects. Cities and towns in Arizona are committed to addressing the need for affordable housing in this state and implementing housing plans to incentivize and drive the development of more housing options. HB2674, however, would not guarantee the development of affordable housing units. The League is opposed to the proposal as it removes decision- making from local elected leaders and their ability to ensure that development fits the 2 community's needs and surrounding residents. The bill is scheduled for a hearing in the House Commerce Committee on Tuesday afternoon. Auto Dealer TPT exemption On Wednesday, February 9, the Senate Finance Committee will hear SB 1372 TPT; exemptions; motor vehicles; nonresidents sponsored by Senator Tyler Pace (R – Mesa). Provisions in SB1372 will allow for a sales tax exemption for commercial vehicles above ten thousand pounds and used to transport people or goods. In prior years the trucking industry has identified that commercial semi-trailers are exempt from TPT in other states, and thus, Arizona companies and drivers are at a cost disadvantage by having to pay taxes in this state. Additionally, the bill provides a TPT exemption to out-of-state residents who purchase a car or truck and obtain a newly created 5-day drive-out permit from the state. The League is opposed to SB1372 in its current form. As it relates to the purchase of cars and trucks by an out-of-state resident, should the purchaser avoid taxes in the state of Arizona, they will nonetheless be required to pay taxes in the state where they register their vehicle. In other words, despite the commerce being generated in Arizona, this bill would allow another state to collect the tax revenue on these purchases. Currently, out-of-state residents purchasing a vehicle are already permitted to obtain a 90-day drive-out permit from the state. They would only be required to pay the municipal but not the state or county sales tax. Unless amended, the League will remain opposed to SB1372 and provide feedback to legislators that this is not an actual tax exemption because other states will require taxes to be paid, and since taxes will be collected, they should be paid in Arizona. Transparency Measures HB 2412 open meetings; digital recordings would require all public bodies to post digital recordings of all meetings on their websites no later than 5 working days after the meeting. While the League supports transparency in government, the measure may have unintended consequences. Rural jurisdictions without access to a reliable internet connection would struggle to meet this new requirement without high-speed internet. The bill would not only apply to council meetings but also require recordings for any advisory board or commission meetings as well. On Wednesday, the House Government & Elections committee heard the bill and passed 8-5. The bill sponsor, Representative Jacqueline Parker (R-Mesa), has committed to working with cities to address our concerns. COVID-19 Preemptions Several bills have been introduced related to preemptions on COVID-19 mitigation efforts. This week, two mirror bills that would remove emergency mayoral authority to order the closure of a business passed committee on a party-line vote: HB 2107 and SB 1048 sponsored by Representative Biasiucci (R-Lake Havasu) and Senator Petersen (R-Gilbert) respectively. While the driver for the measures is COVID-19, the bills would preempt all closures regardless of the emergency. HB 2498 COVID-19; vaccination requirements; prohibition sponsored by Representative Hoffman (R-Queen Creek) prohibits any government entity from requiring a resident to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. This bill passed the House Government & Elections committee 7-5. Next week, SB 1298 government mask mandate; prohibition sponsored by Senator Wendy Rogers (R- Flagstaff) will be heard in the Senate Government committee. The measure prohibits cities and towns from requiring face masks inside city buildings. A similar effort (HB 2453) 3 passed a House committee this week. During the height of the pandemic, under executive orders issued by the Governor, cities and towns as well as other political subdivisions preserved the ability to have mitigation policies inside municipal buildings. These bills infringe on local elected leaders’ authority to make these decisions – the League opposed HB 2453 and will be opposing SB 1298. 2022 Session Timeline Every session has deadlines pertaining to bill submissions and hearings. This year, the schedule is as follows: January 1/10 – First day of session 1/13 – House 7-bill Introduction Limit Begins (5 p.m.) 1/31 - Senate bill introduction deadline (5 p.m.) February 2/7 – House Bill Introduction Deadline (5 p.m.) 2/14 - 2/18 – Last week to hear bills in the chamber of origin March 3/21 – 3/25 – Last week to hear bills in the opposing chamber April 4/15 – Last Day for Conference Committees 4/19 – 100th Day of Session