HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPAC.2012.0417.Minutes p
•
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
MINUTES OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS
STRATEGIC PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
April 17,2012
AGENDA ITEM(1)—CALL TO ORDER
Chair Audra Koester Thomas called the meeting to order in Council Chambers at Town Hall at 4:03 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM(2)—ROLL CALL
Present for roll call were the following members of the Strategic Planning Advisory Commission: Chair Audra
Koester Thomas, Vice Chair Curt Dunham, Commissioners Denise Atwood, Nick DePorter, Mike Dooley, Alan
Magazine and Barry Spiker, and Youth Commissioner Sarah Traylor. Also present were Town Manager Ken
Buchanan, Deputy Town Manager/Finance Director Julie Ghetti, Economic Development Administrator Lori
Gary, and Recording Secretary Shaunna Williams.
AGENDA ITEM(3)—CALL TO THE PUBLIC
No one appeared at the Call to the Public.
AGENDA ITEM(4)-CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 6,2012
Commissioner Magazine MOVED to approve the March 6, 2012 meeting minutes and Commissioner Dooley
SECONDED the motion,which CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present.
AGENDA ITEM (5) —TOWN MANAGER'S UPDATE: (A) UPDATE ON STATUS OF SPAC
RECOMMENDED STRATEGIC DIRECTIVE ADDITIONS; (B)UPCOMING TOWN EVENTS
Mr. Buchanan noted upcoming community events, including a budget open house on April 18, electronics and
paper shredding events on April 21, and a drug take back event on April 28.
Mr. Buchanan pointed out that the proposed addition of three Strategic Directions to the Strategic Plan is on the
Council agenda for the meeting on April 19.
Ms.Koester Thomas stated that she would attend in case there are questions,but not to make a presentation.
Mr. Buchanan responded to a question from the Commission regarding the adoption date for the FY12-13 budget
by stating that due to the election the adoption date may be delayed into June.
In response to a question from the Commission, Mr. Buchanan stated that a sign open house will also be held on
April 18.
AGENDA ITEM(6) —UPDATE ON TOWN FINANCES AND FY12-13 DRAFT BUDGET
Ms. Ghetti made a PowerPoint presentation regarding the draft FY12-13 budget (copy attached). She responded
to questions from the Commission by stating that she would not anticipate more than a 3% increase in sales tax
revenue over the next few years;that the Capital Projects Fund is approximately 37% of expenditures and that the
Town is applying for approximately $10M in ARRA grant funds; that Community Contracts will be restored to
FY12 levels; that the process for evaluating Community Contracts is ongoing and that there was no indication
from the Council that competitive bids should be sought.
Page 1 of 3
AGENDA ITEM (7) — DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION OF THE REVISED •
FIRST PROGRESS REPORT FROM ASU'S NEW VENTURE GROUP ON THE RESEARCH
PROJECT "COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES AND REGIONAL COLLABORATIVE
OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN THE TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS"
Chair Koester Thomas welcomed Jennifer Bell and Brook Seaman, representatives of ASU's New
Venture Group (NVG), and their advisor, Professor Dan Brooks.
Ms. Bell and Mr. Seaman presented an "Evaluation of Economic Development Opportunities in the
Health Sector" (copy attached), outlining ongoing work by NVG.
Ms. Bell stated that the purpose of presentation is to make SPAC aware of specific areas of work and
obtain feedback from SPAC; that the focus of NVG's investigation has been the identification of areas
within the health related industries which could be contributors to the economic development of
Fountain Hills and steps to take to investigate possibilities based on studies conducted by the Small
Business Administration.
Mr. Seaman stated that their current investigation includes Fountain Hills' opportunities and strengths,
as well possible challenges; that the four sectors of health related industries being examined are health
care, wellness, medical and bio-medical; that eight representative business have been identified within
the four identified health care sectors; that their study will result in a prioritized ranking of these
businesses identifying which ones to target for further investigation; that their study will additionally
provide insights into the relative pros and cons of each business and the tradeoffs associated with
pursuing each option. He noted that the deliverables to be presented at the SPAC meeting on May 7 will •
include a written report, data accumulated in their studies, and a PowerPoint presentation. He asked
SPAC for additions, adjustments or suggestions to incorporate into their final report.
Professor Dan Brooks explained aspects of the NVG study and responded to questions from the
Commissioners by stating that the study has identified two representatives businesses in each of the four
sectors defined in the Scope of Work; that businesses have been defined using objectives for economic
development in Fountain Hills that were obtained through earlier interviews with SPAC representatives;
that the study involves looking at what it takes to attract a company to Fountain Hills and what it takes
to retain that company; that bio-tech businesses examined during the course of the study can serve as a
benchmark when making comparisons to businesses in other sectors; that Fountain Hills has a number of
characteristics that are not reflective of a lot of smaller communities and it is difficult to find any exact
analogue, i.e., that demographics and the rate of change of demographics are unique to Fountain Hills;
that demographics, combined with physical location, make it a challenge to identify new business or
entrepreneurial activities that would find Fountain Hills an ideal place to locate because they are
characterized by capital investment and a local work force that is relatively younger and has technical
skills; that NVG has spent a lot of time examining potential opportunities, changed direction a number
of times, and has invested time deciding not to pursue certain avenues; that creating a portal of
businesses with similar capabilities has associated advantages and disadvantages; that the NVG report
will not recommend anything specifically, but instead provide a strategy table, i.e., a systematic way of
thinking of combinations of activities that could constitute economic development and an evaluation
process to determine if they are worth pursuing; that if the strategy table proves helpful NVG would be
willing to work with SPAC to get more precise; that businesses can often be more successful when
located in synergistic clusters because they utilize a common work force and infrastructure, zoning, tax
structure, advertising, etc. often adjust around the clusters; that NVG will genuinely work to provide
Page 2 of 3
their final report in advance of the May 7.SPAC meeting; that NVG is willing to attend a follow-up
meeting after SPAC has an opportunity to digest their report; that NVG is willing to utilize a radius to
determine a potential work force, specifically data to be provided by Ms. Gary (28 to 29-minute
commute time one-way yields a work force of approximately 120,000, 78% of which are highly
educated).
In response to a question about the eight representative businesses that were specifically identified by
NVG in the four business sectors, Mr. Seaman reported that they are short to mid-term medical care;
rehab facilities such as physical therapy or sports rehabilitation; computer software in the healthcare
industry; lifestyle disability solutions, e.g., wheelchair manufacturing or repair; mail order companies
that provide health care products, e.g., herbal medicines; mail order pharmacies; processing laboratories,
e. g.,blood samples; and bio-medical facilities.
Dr. Brooks noted that SPAC is welcome to add to the eight representatives identified by NVG. He
agreed to send the list to Chair Koester Thomas, who will distribute it to the Commission to obtain
feedback.
Chair Koester Thomas expressed the appreciation of the Commission for the pro bono work of NVG.
AGENDA ITEM(8)—DISCUSSION REGARDING EXPIRING COMMISSION TERMS
Ms. Williams stated that the terms of two Commissioners would expire on June 30 (Chair Koester
Thomas and Commissioner Spiker) and that advertising would be placed to solicit applications. She
noted that seated Commissioners would be required to reapply.
At the request of Chair Koester Thomas, Ms. Williams agreed to forward application packets to
Commissioners whose terms would be expiring.
AGENDA ITEM(9)—SCHEDULE UPCOMING MEETINGS
It was noted that a SPAC meeting is currently scheduled on May 7 beginning at 4:00 p.m. Two
additional meetings were scheduled on June 12 and July 10, each beginning at 4:00 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM (10)-ADJOURN
Commissioner Dooley MOVED to adjourn at 5:22 p.m. and Vice Chair Dunham SECONDED the motion,which
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present.
U.), 4 0�
Shaunna Williams,Recording Secretary
Page 3 of 3
i
Budget Update to
Strategic Planning E°
Advisory
Commission
r_. keill
o �n
�• tSL l9a9 •
that is
re Prepared by:
Julie A.Ghetti,MPA,CPA
` - Apr1117,20:2
".r
S
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
BUDGETARY FUNDS
,141
COW ill.KNIA1
RINDS PRO
1 1
1 1 1 1
General/ Special Revenue capRal Intemai Services ..
Operadngfund Funds Im Finsmt funds a.
I
•General Fund •"ighway User •Revenue Bond 'Capital Rm(ects •General Inte.n.
(1001 17417,17(Fund Debt Seryice(500) Fund1600) servlcv fund(6�
Town Iuns
'General 'taw Entartement •VeMtltY f:
•Eacbe Tax FurW ObBgatp(Debt Development Get Ia.mp tF s�
13001 Service(510) FUM 01°1 Replare(810)F,.r..
0)
Funds •Spedel Revenue •EageMtn CfO Fire/Eme gent'
Granes fw•aleoo) Debt servlct(s]61 bevNppmen:Gee it
Fund 1730)
•publlcAf Fund Property
C ul
(410) property corp •SNeets
•ett servlce(530) bevelopment Fee.
vundp30)
'Court
Enhancement •cp snwoeebtm•
iuM 1430) oIrtN DebtIS4O) 010elopmentFee
Servlce(Sa0) Dav und(ent Fee
Fund(]40)
`Open Space
Fund(750)]50)
Develnd( re
•Ubrsry/Museum n`
Dwclnpment Fee „*..
Fond(]60)
•General
Govpr
und PM)
bevelopment Fet
1
I
FY11-12 Revenues YTD
Revenue All Funds
Account Title MAR FY10-11 MAR FYI 1-12 Period Budget Budget
General Fund $9,423,821 $9,150,757 $9,468,359 96.6%
IICRF $1,079,004 $861,800 $871,839 98.8%
Dev Fees $26,859 $11,598 $66,446 17.5%
Special Revenue $182,291 $192,969 $1,125,000 17.2%
Economic Development $217,301 $210,871 $204,102 103.3%
Debt Svc MPC $1,037,409 $410,223 $618,903 66.3%
Debt Svc GO $963,867 $943,379 $1,080,077 87.3%
CIP $275,553 $549,356 $10,554,068 5 2%
Grand Total All Funds $13,206,105 $12,330,953 $23,988,794 51 4
April 17,2012
General Fund Revenues
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/2012
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
TOTAL$9.21\1
$5.0
State Sales Tax State Income Tax
III
::: ■
Local Sales Tax
t+MAR FV10-11 MAR FY11-12 II Bud;et
Gt.. April t7,zor2
e
2
0
Local Sales Tax
July-March Retail Activity JulysMarch Restaurant/Bar Activity
i
I
i
sssoo,.rr l iiiiiiiiii
l _ too.oro-
s+oo.00eIII --- nraw
rrnm nraar nwu rnou nuu nuryw
July-March T r/ralacemmunkrtlonr Satyr Tae AcUvky JWy-Mrrh Ceustrurtlon Saes Too.0otlsiry
aeon.
suooaro
limos..
nAM.
.��. Nowa
44500.00.
ll III 111 ill
$rppJMr MooLm ■ Y
II 111 r,r,r rr r r�r
FYOTAII FY011-09 FY01.10 FYI0.11 FY11.12 FYI.
seal.:
�'4 April17,2012
0
General Fund Expenditures
FY2011-12 FY2011-12
Nine Month Nine Month YTD to
Expenditures by Department Budget Actual Budget Annual Estimate
Police $2,174,642 $2,036,996 93.7% $2,899,522
Fire& Emergency Medical Services $2,367,159 $2,322,831 98.1% $3,156,212
Development Services $1,200,368 $1,124,135 93.6% $1,600,490
Community Services $1,642,461 $1,737,809 105.8% $2,189,948
Municipal Court $324,633 $310,508 95.6% $432,844
Mayor&Town Council $56,809 $51,161 90.1% $75,745
Administrative Services $1,681,043 $1,563,036 93.0% $2,241,390
TOTAL $9,447,113 $9,146,476y 96.8% $12,596,151
April 17.2012
0
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/2012
ALL OTHER FUNDS
TOTAL$3.21\1
$1,400.0
$1,200.0 i _....
Debt Svc MPC
$1,000.0 --- ------ Debt Svc GO
HURF
$800.0 P»•:
$600.0
CID
Special Revenue
:::::
DevFeesMAE
Economic Development
Thousands
MAR FY10.11 •MAR FY11-12
•
FYI 2-13 Proposed Budget
...'-...... TONS OF FOUNTAIN HILLS
REVENUES RV SOURCE
p.taiR.n.)
^,p
TO\\N OF FOUNLUN HILLS
EXPENDITURES BY USE
li.millions)
TOTAL ALL SOURCES
nw nnr.w a ''� ram..wy.rt.rW
rx er-
ohs $ �
aw.• a rw _xu ` w
D I L11,.11.1.Usk,. r. + a r•
St1.45I
April 17,2012
4
GENERAL FUND
General Fund Revenues FY12-13 GENERAL FUND REVENUES
Ian n,�iiio,ul $13.7M
$1e.0
::::
Sx.a- Sll.s 00., %
:::: IIiiii
rror of Froa03 Fvo.O mrO fvuax nJaO General Fund Expenditures
II}I2-13 GENERAL do millions)
S13.611 $"'° $Is.c
$1J.8
111111
EY07-0S FY08.09 FY09-10 FY10.11 FY11.12 FY12.13
STATE SHARED REVENUES 12°'0
STATE SHARED SALES TAX REVENUE
weenoo
.011190
$1.500M.
STATE SHARED LNCOTIE L N REVENUE
1.0.009
e uuJ 1 rw
�—.. f'Ia.:Je - Ill o�lch'I113 --- • "
f:mout
-
1i1øIII$blr ,
4w
I_vo m i
•
'— Eix.xl�-e:n.111aJJu unc4�u13-
5
LOCAL SALES TAX I 3%
Tax rate 2. % u ,I.SALES TAX-ALL FUNDS
local, 9.9% SI:CAM
including
State/County I
2.3% goes to
General Fund
.3% goes to debt L ,
• —Floral.ear.2004 du wnrh 2013
retirement fund
PERSONNEL & BENEFITS I 2%
$3,356,721
• No new staff positions
• 56.5 FTE's (45 full-time, 19 part-time)
• 15% savings in health insurance premiums
2.5% merit/cost of living increase for staff
Number of Town Employees
Delivery of service to the
citizens of Fountain Hills is
I 1 dependent upon the number of
employees who can perform the
services.
III
6
ADMINISTRATION lo %
$2,485,022
Includes risk insurance, HR, IT, Manager, Legal, Clerk,
Economic Development, Budget, Finance, Licensing,
Auditor, Customer Service, Volunteer
• Restore Tourism, community contracts to FY-2 levels
• Restore computer and server replacement program
• Restore Town Prosecutor to full time
• Integrated marketing strategy (ED)
• Includes special election for franchise agreement
• Includes $25o,000 contingency as safety net
,,/.....7,...,,,v,
_ ,... 'v a °..
ID
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 129%
$2,071,685
Includes Planning, Building Safety, Code
Enforcement, Stormwater Management, Engineering,
CIP, Facilities, GIS
Continues ADWR fee, ADEQ permit, dam inspections
for $60,000
• Restores wash maintenance program to $150K
• Restores facilities maintenance program $35oK
• Household hazardous waste event
• New plotter/scanner for GIS
L.
7
,
COMMUNITY SERVICES 1.3%
$2,2331838
• Additional maintenance for trails, parks, irrigation
system
• Rebuild fountain cla-valve $12,000
• Repair and stripe parking lots $42,500
• Community Center bond payment
"4..,
.
FIRE & EMERGENCY MEDICAL I3%
$3,255,335
• Contract with Rural Metro
• Added $24,00o to contract for CARE program
• Addition of new extrication equipment
• Grant for self contained breathing apparatus
(SCBA's)
Includes depreciation cost for fire engines
..._:............................... ..
J
8
.
C
LAW ENFORCEMENT ,50/0
�. `
$3,049,572
3.8 beats
School Resource Officer
Increases to County benefits are passed on to the
Town
Includes contract with County for animal control
and jail fees
0
STREETS FUND (HURF)
• Funds street division HICRRWA]'(rSER MORE)RE\EWE
operations
I LOOM)
Potholes, street signs, 1
medians, signals, etc.
Swept by State 1 _
legislature ""m°.
Does not fund proper "—
pavement maintenance "—
Fisralvar'x 2003r1uoach_`01? --
I
lk : "' Ito` i _,.
**0- Ow I
0
. .. .
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
$11,687,280
jjinir m won."ki-iti tttl
CapitalFrojectsB�Funding Source
mmuiiona °--U6II��1 ¢F -- _. --�:
onsoom
ag
„,,„« 3 i_^ ° 3
ao.
8
ss.m FYI012-13 La111fatlseTaa General Non Town
Pnsiett Oteaory 006153 vroIo j 100$ 000 16961
ila
5Dntl
0 ,,,town $2,130.000 5]90,000 $1,240,000 50 $300,000
Improvements
Street(Stlewalk 55,074,000 $1.0)3 000 $0 50 $3,401,000
Improvemenls
TOTAL$II."Af 0 06019rub $453,000 $453,000 SD SD $0
...._....__..__..___-- Park improvemen[i 5350.000 $350.000 $0 50 $0
h 0 6. V,I C. I General 6overnme0. 596,000 $0 $0 $25,000 $7I,000
4 . . Prnie.
W nar St-'I F' &EMSProjx[s $2.960.000 550].000 50 $16,000 52,a3],000
au2v f Drainage $65,000 $65,000 00 00 50
n
gM06 `%. j library/Event Urzle $ag,000 540,000 5050 $0
Y o ; 0006092 9 5111,201 $131,280 $0 $0 $0
• wy__ -. c Vebick fl4pittement $400,000 5400.000 00 50 50
R io rD✓n ro, TOW 511.6R.290 $Id91.290 $5,240,000 $41.000 $4009,000
x„#y zw.n EKE p'c,.. ,-
x1.7nr.'
Questions?
April 17,2011
al
10
EVALUATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE HEALTH SECTOR
A Presentation to Fountain Hills SPAC
Outlining on-going work by
New Venture Group
April 17, 2012
1. Purpose of this presentation
2. Overall objective of the research being conducted for SPAC
3. Context and focus of the investigation based on studies conducted by the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
4. The opportunities and strengths of Fountain Hills in attracting economic
development in contrast to the challenges
® 5. The four areas of the health sector of most interest to Fountain Hills in this
preliminary study
6. Specific examples or "realizations" used to represent the salient aspects of
each of the four areas
7. The relative attractiveness of each of the areas based on Fountain Hills'
objectives for economic development
8. Prioritizing development opportunities in the four health areas
9. Deliverables and dates