Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.1003.TCOM.Minutes TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION October 3,2008 Mayor Schlum called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m. AGENDA ITEM#1 —WELCOME The following members of the Fountain Hills Town Council were present: Mayor Jay Schlum, Councilmember Dennis Contino, Vice Mayor Henry Leger, Councilmember Keith McMahan, Councilmember Cassie Hansen, Councilmember Mike Archambault and Councilmember Ginny Dickey. The following staff members were present: Town Manager Rick Davis, Town Attorney Andrew McGuire,Judge Ted Armbruster, Assistant to the Town Manager Kate Zanon, Accounting Supervisor Mary Martin, Assistant Fire Chief Randy Roberts, Finance Director Julie Ghetti, Human Resource/Risk Manager Joan McIntosh, Planning & Zoning Director Richard Turner Parks & Recreation Director Mark Mayer, Community Center Director Samantha Coffman, Public Works Director Tom Ward, Public Information Officer Katie Decker, Town Clerk Bev Bender, Executive Assistant to the Mayor and Town Council Shaunna Williams. Mayor Schlum welcomed everyone and stated that the purpose of this session was for the sharing and collaboration of ideas. Town Manager Davis spoke about the process that would be followed. He stated that this was a planning session for the Town Council and the opportunity for free flowing of ideas. He asked that everyone be respectful and to have fun with the experience. AGENDA ITEM#2—FY2009-10 PROPOSED BUDGET SCHEDULE. Finance Director Julie Ghetti spoke briefly about the proposed budget schedule noting that the dates may change. She reviewed that the scheduled included additional opportunities for public input from citizens. AGENDA ITEM #3 — ECONOMIC UPDATE: A) FY2008 YEAR-END FINANCIAL REPORT, B) FY2009 REVENUE PROJECTION,AND C) FUTURE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK. Ms. Ghetti presented an economic update for year-end FY2008 and highlighted that $1M savings in the General Fund was available for transfer to the Capital Projects Fund. She mentioned that the State income tax was 25% higher than the prior year, local sales tax was 7% less, and the Town's building permit revenue was 27% less with the overall General Fund revenues 1% less. She reviewed the various revenue source projections stating that they were based on trends and that staff continued to be conservative with future projections. Ms. Ghetti responded to a question by Mayor Schlum stating that the residential permits were based on new construction and did not include remodeling. Ms. Ghetti stated that the Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) was declining and that it would likely be less next year. Ms. Ghetti reviewed the economy in general, pointing out that construction continued to be weak, with new single family building permits having ground to a halt; the state income tax was expected to be less next fiscal year, the state budget deficit might affect cities' and towns' state shared revenues, and that the development of the Ellman property would probably be extended beyond 2010. She also commented on the fact that multiple foreclosures could result in a shortfall of property tax collection, and that foreclosed homes meant more abandoned properties with Town liens for pool abatement. Councilmember Archambault questioned how the Town would recover a lien on a foreclosed property. Ms. Ghetti responded that the lien would be paid when the property was sold as the home sale could not close until paid. Town Attorney McGuire clarified that the Town's lien would take 2nd place to general taxes. Ms. Ghetti commented on the fact that HURF revenues and vehicle license taxes were also expected to be less than projected with investment earnings less than in previous years(i.e. interest). z:\council packets\2008\r11-6-08\10-03-08 council strategic planning session minutes.doc Page 1 of 5 Ms. Ghetti reviewed the fund balances as of June 30, 2008: General Fund - $6.6M, Streets - $0.4M, Development Fees - $2.3M, Downtown Development - $1.0M, Debt Service - $1.6M, and Capital Projects - $10.8M. Ms. Ghetti confirmed for Vice Mayor Leger that the Capital Projects Fund ($10.8M) included the $1M savings mentioned early Le that was available for transfer from the General Fund. Ms. Ghetti summarized by stating that the economic slowdown gave an opportunity to re-engineer ourselves for more efficiency and better service. She stated that expenditures would continue to be monitored to ensure that there were sufficient current year revenues before approving the purchase of goods or services. AGENDA ITEM#4—NEW INITIATIVES. Town Manager Davis stated that the Town could not spend more than it had and expressed that the Town needed to constantly be innovative in its service to citizens in order to keep services the same. He presented the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM) and defined it as a problem solving technique that empowered people who work the closest to a problem to come up with the solution. Mr. Davis stated the word"empowers" was the key and noted that due to the current economic climate, there needed to be a shift in the organization's paradigm. He acknowledged that it would be viewed skeptically by those who did not want to give up control. He stated that employees were capable of developing great ideas and now was the time to ask how situations could be made better. Mr. Davis spoke about principles vs. values and explained the various points of the TQM process: empowerment, opportunity for recognition, team formation, idea generation, plan formation and presentation, feedback and empowerment, idea implementation and monitoring, and evaluation and reporting. He stated it was time to stop doing "S.T.U.P.I.D." (S. — silly; T. - time consuming; U. - useless, P. - problematic, I. - ineffective, and D. - darn expensive) things. Mr. Davis stated the opinion that problems were an opportunity to improve. Mayor Schlum commented that this was a way to make sure that everyone was on the same page and he felt that this was valuable to keep in mind. Mr. Davis summarized that he would: i) work with Finance to develop evaluate methodology/standards; ii) work with Human Resources to design a monitor and reward system; iii) introduce the TQM process to the employees; iv) work with the public information officer to develop methodology for celebrating innovation, and v) provide an annual report on innovation to the Council. Mr. Davis called for a break at 2:00 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 2:12 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #5 — WHO ARE WE SERVING AND HOW ARE WE DOING A) CONCEPT OF A CITIZEN SURVEY AND B) COUNCIL FEEDBACK AND BRAINSTORMING SESSION (DOTS). Mr. Davis briefly introduced the idea of a citizen survey to the Council, asked that the Council review the draft provided at this meeting, and provide comments to him before the Council's January retreat. He indicated it was his intent to execute the survey later in the winter if Council approved. Mr. Davis distributed colored dots (red, yellow, and green)to the Council and explained the guidelines for placement of said dots on the various categories of function priorities listed on sheets displayed. He asked that a maximum of three dots per Councilmember be placed on any one item. Red — meant, "pay attention" to this item during the budget cycle, important. Yellow — meant, "important", but not for next year. Green — meant, "good here", nothing eminent. He stated the purpose was to get feedback from the Council on those areas that received red dots. He commented on the fact that Town staff would duplicate this process at their retreat. Mr. Davis responded to Mayor Schlum's question as to how to insure citizens' input on priorities by stating that the Council had been provided with a copy of the strategic plan document for reference to assistance with placement of their dots. Mr. Davis stated that he would bring forward a summary of the priorities as indicated in this exercise to Laythe Council at their October 14`t' meeting. He said that the Council's discussion would focus on quantifying their prioritization rationale. Councilmember Hansen noted that each Councilmember's reasons may be different and Mr. Davis stated that he hoped the discussion would bring that information forward. z:\council packets\2008\r11-6-08\10-03-08 council strategic planning session minutes.doc Page 2 of 5 Mr. Davis called for a break at 2:55 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 3:12 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #6 — SUSTAINABILITY OF FOUNTAIN HILLS — UPDATE ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES. Planner Gene Slechta provided an update on the Town's environmental policies, beginning with a review of the milestones, which had resulted in the Council's adoption of Resolution 2008-18 on May 15, 2008, "Establishing Environmental Policies for the Town to Protect and Improve the Health and Safety of the Community". He reviewed that the Environmental Committee initially had forty initiatives that they were able to reduce to the "top ten", which were 1) curb recycling/trash hauling, 2) reclaimed water usage partnership, 3) fluorescent bulbs, 4) recycling Town facilities and parks, 5) household hazardous waste event, 6) partner with School District/Town on recreation sites, 7) Create riparian area in Ashbrook Wash, 8) Leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) in Town facilities, and 9) Solar Incentives, and 10) LEED certified operations of Town facilities. He stated that the #7 had been removed from the list and that#8 and#9 were tied as related to their importance. Mr. Slechta also reviewed other ideas such as the U.S. Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement, plastic bag ban/recycling, develop a metrics/scorecard, alternative fuel station pumps, drug disposal, Town hosted recycle bins, "Get Help" - ICLEI/volunteers and cool cities. He spoke about other happening such as paper shredding, the 2006 Building and Energy Codes, 4-10s, the U.S. Congress energy bill, the rinse smart program, environmental education in schools, PM 10,the Botanical Gardens, the electronics recycling events, and the"Running Out of Air"program. Mr. Slechta summarized where the Town could go from here as follows: a GHG inventory, develop a strategy on volunteers, review and revisit our list, and to determine the budget impacts of actions. Human Resource Administrator Joan McIntosh provided additional information on the topic of modified business hours. She stated four reasons for considering modified business hours: 1) it would enhance customer service, 2) create a positive environmental impact, 3) provide cost savings for the Town, and 4) assist with employee recruitment/retention and overall job satisfaction. Ms. McIntosh explained the proposed plan called for the lengthening of business hours Monday through Thursday(7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) with Town Hall closed on Fridays, which would create Customer Convenience Hours that allowed residents and other customers to conduct business at Town Hall before or after their standard business day. She noted this would be of particular benefit to builders and contractors as well as to those residents who commute out of Town to work. She discussed that this would create a positive impact on the environment in the areas of energy conservation and would reduce pollution. Ms. McIntosh referred to the Strategic Plan pointing out that this initiative would support the Council's goal of enhancing stewardship of the natural environment, would support the goal of Maricopa County's Trip Reduction Program, and would work towards the Council's goal of making environmental costs, risks and impacts an integral part of its planning and decision making processes as stated in the Town's environmental policy. She reviewed potential costs savings for the Town stating staff had estimated a 14.5% savings on utility bills and Town fleet fuel consumption. Ms. McIntosh reviewed how this change in business hours would benefit the Town in employee recruitment, assist with employee retention, and enhance employee job satisfaction. Mr. Davis asked Councilmember Dickey if the State was considering implementing 4-10s. Councilmember Dickey responded that the State was not, as it had been determined to be too much of a hardship. Councilmember Archambault asked if this affected emergency services to which Ms. McIntosh responded no, as they were required to be open the same hours (24/7). Councilmember Archambault questioned if staff was supportive of this change and Ms. McIntosh replied that the majority were in favor of this change. Ms. McIntosh spoke of additional benefits that included the creation of additional parking for those events held on Fridays and an anticipated reduction in staff sick leave due to medical appointments on work days. She expressed that it was important to implement this on a trial basis in order to solicit public feedback through various methods (i.e. walk-in, mail-in, and web surveys) in order to track those services used during the extended business hours, and cm,. to monitor any complaints with prompt follow-up. She explained that the proposed customer convenience hours would integrate well with the E-government initiative set to begin in November as it would provide citizens with 24/7 access to Town Hall. The frequently asked questions and Customer Request Management System would be z:\council packets\2008\r11-6-08\10-03-08 council strategic planning session minutes.doc Page 3 of 5 available to citizens on-line and even though Town Hall was closed on Fridays, citizens would have access to Town government. Ms. McIntosh pointed out that the Community Center/Senior Services, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Fountain Hills Rural Metro would remain open on Fridays through the use of modified work schedules. Ms. McIntosh commented on potential challenges. She stated that for those residents and customers who wanted to do Town business on Fridays, they would have access to drop boxes, e-government services on-line, help lines, and on-call personnel. However, in those instances when Town business must take place on a Friday, Department Directors would have the ability to schedule employees or make appointments as necessary. She acknowledged that it might take time for the public to get used to the change in hours of operation and proposed that the first floor entrances to Town hall remain open on Fridays with volunteers present at the Information Desk for the first two Fridays to answer any questions about Town Hall hours and to distribute literature about Customer Convenience hours. She address that employees might have child care issues and that some employees might experience fatigue with the extended hours. However, she proposed that flexibility would be given to each department to address the employees' child care needs. With regard to possible fatigue, she pointed out that those cities working with schedules similar to those proposed had reported an increase in employee productivity once employees had adjusted to the schedule. Ms. McIntosh stated that advance notification to the public would be critical and a well planned and extensive public outreach program would take a minimum of 30 days to implement. She discussed the proposed outreach components that would be used and said she would be happy to answer any questions. Discussion ensued with regard to maintaining citizens' level of service remain the same; the fact that the number of citizens who frequented Town Hall and the number of phone calls were lower on Fridays, the fact that the Street Department would remain "on call" to respond in an emergency if needed, the fact that 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. was a long day; the option of having a skeleton staff on Friday with Mondays off instead; the fact that code enforcement officers would continue offering their 7 day service; and the fact that building safety inspectors did not conduct emergency inspections. Mr. McGuire commented that Avondale found with the longer work schedule that their inspectors were able to perform dual inspections on the same day when needed. Mr. Ward noted that construction Nor work could start as early as 5:30 a.m. under the current Town ordinance. Further discussion was held regarding how employee vacation days were earned; if the affect on PM-10, PM 2.5, and carbon dioxide had been calculated; how long the trial period might be and when it could start in order to provide enough time for evaluation prior to the new fiscal year budget process; concerns that public input should be provided for on the front side of the discussion prior to actually implementing such a measure instead of on the back side(after implementing); and what steps needed to be taken to provide for public input to ensure feedback from the public before the Council made their decision. Mr. McGuire reviewed how Avondale had proceeded stating that a work-study session had been held and then the item was brought back to a Council meeting with all steps for implementation. Vice Mayor Leger reiterated concerns that the public needed the opportunity on the front side of the discussion and requested that step be made part of the process. Mr. Davis advised against doing so and stating that at this time the public's input would be based on an imaginary experience. He suggested that a trial period would provide the public with an opportunity to see if it worked and then the Council would have public input based on a realistic opinion. Vice Mayor Leger agreed there was always concern when change was proposed and that might provide for a knee jerk reaction; however, he wanted to ask the question. He proposed having public input at a Council meeting followed by a work-study that was designed to develop and bring back the product to a Council meeting for further discussion. In response to Councilmember Dickey and Vice Mayor Leger relating to whether implementation would be something the Council voted on or if it would be handled administratively, Mr. McGuire responded implementation would require a vote of the Council. Councilmember Hansen suggested that Ms. McIntosh be given the opportunity to review the same presentation just shared with the Council at a public meeting. Ms. McIntosh stated that could be done stating that she could stress the benefits to the public of the additional two hours in the shortened work week. Councilmember Contino questioned if the school district had given any thought to a four day week and also pointed out that implementing now would not provide an accurate reading on any summer utilities savings. Mr. Davis z:\council packets\2008\r11-6-08\10-03-08 council strategic planning session minutes.doc Page 4 of 5 responded that the trial period could be extended unless public complaints were received. Councilmember Dickey agreed with Mr. Davis stating that the pilot program was to see what the public's reaction was. Mr. Ward stated the opinion that the Town's peak population period, when winter residents returned, was a better time for a trial period. LP, Mayor Schlum stated E-Fountain must be in place for response to citizens prior to implementation and indicated that the same level of service must be provided; however, if it made the Town more competitive and added benefit to employees, he was in favor of moving on to the next step. Vice Mayor Leger said change was about learning and he felt this was a fantastic idea although he questioned the process to obtain public input. He expressed that the cost benefit (savings) had to be more and requested that staff do additional research and explore other savings that would be of benefit to the Town. Councilmember Dickey asked if commuting employees' fuel costs had been calculated for savings. Mr. Davis said that could be looked into. Ms. Decker confirmed that E-Fountain was on track to be up and running in six weeks. Mr. Davis proposed that staff bring Ms. McIntosh's presentation forward at the October 16, 2008, Council meeting with the added proposal of a public communication component that would be included by Ms. Decker. Mr. Davis announced the Wii tournament would be held in the Community Center Yavapai meeting room for those interested in participating. AGENDA ITEM#7—WII TOURNAMENT(ATTENDANCE OPTIONAL). The meeting adjourned at 4:15 p.m. TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS By T. Schlum,Mayor ATTEST AND PREPARED BY: Bevelyn J en r,Town Clerk CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Fountain Hills Town Council Strategic Planning Session held by the Town Council of Fountain Hills in the Fountain Hills Community Center(Ballroom#1) on the 3rd day of October, 2008. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 6th day of November 2008. Bevelyn J. nd ,Town Clerk Lire z:\council packets\2008\rl 1-6-08\10-03-08 council strategic planning session minutes.doc Page 5 of 5