Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019.1001.TCRM.Minutes
TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FOUNTAIN HILLS TOWN COUNCIL OCTOBER 1, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Ginny Dickey Mayor Dickey called the meeting of October 1, 2019, to order at 5:30 p.m. and led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE - Pastor Jeff Teeples, Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church Pastor Teeples came forward and gave the invocation. 3. ROLL CALL— Mayor Dickey Present: Mayor Ginny Dickey; Vice Mayor Sherry Leckrone; Councilmember Mike Scharnow; Councilmember Art Tolis; Councilmember Dennis Brown; Councilmember Alan Magazine; Councilmember David Spelich Staff Town Manager Grady E. Miller; Town Attorney Aaron D. Arnson; Town Clerk Present: Elizabeth A. Burke 4. REPORTS BY MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND TOWN MANAGER Councilmember Scharnow reported that two weeks ago he attended a luncheon with the Consular Corps of Arizona along with Enrique Melendez, former Councilmember and current Executive Director of that organization. They met with others including the honorary consul to Poland as well as Carol Carroll, Chairman of the Sister Cities Commission. Dr. Sybil Francis of the Center for the Future of Arizona gave a presentation. He also reported that last week he attended the Valley Metro Board Meeting. Councilmember Scharnow reported that last week he also attended a luncheon that was a brainstorming session on economic development with Mayor Oscar Gomez of Otaca, Mexico. They presented a plaque to the Mayor of Fountain Hills, and he then read the plaque and presented it to Mayor Dickey. Councilmember Tolis reported that he attended the Homecoming Parade which was nice and showed good community spirit. Town Manager Grady Miller reported that last week was Government Day with the Leadership Academy where he and department heads met with the 17 members of this year's class and they were pleased to be a part of it. Mayor Dickey added that they had previously held a Leadership Academy reception which was well attended. She reported that they moved to "Plan B" with the Oktoberfest activities due to the weather earlier in the week and the park not being available for use. She said that they had businesses and service organizations step up and it was a nice event overall. Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 2 of 23 Mayor Dickey reported that she had attended a MAG (Maricopa Association of Governments) Regional Council Meeting and they voted to wait to ask the Legislature for the go-ahead on the ability to ask the voters to renew Prop 400 to the 2021 session. Maricopa County, for the third year in a row, is the fastest growing county in the country so some of the mayors expressed interest in visiting the gas tax. She said that Gilbert Vice Mayor Cook presented at the meeting on Domestic Violence and while the Town of Fountain Hills will be recognizing October as Domestic Violence Prevention Month at the October 15 meeting, she presented each of the Councilmembers a purple ribbon at this meeting and asked them to bring it back for the future meeting. A. PROCLAMATION - October 6 through 12, 2019, as Fire Prevention Week Mayor Dickey read a proclamation proclaiming October 6— 12, 2019, as Fire Prevention Week in Fountain Hills. 5. SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES/PRESENTATIONS A. PRESENTATIONS by Arizona State Legislators of District 23 Mayor Dickey said that earlier in the year Councilmember Tolis had suggested that the state legislators for District 23 be invited to a Council meeting and tonight was the meeting scheduled for that report. State Representative John Kavanagh came forward to review what they have done this year in the State Legislature. He said that there were 1,318 bills introduced and of those, 331 got through committees and sent to the Governor where 11 were vetoed and 320 were signed. He said that 30% of the bills dealt with municipalities so he would report on those that may be more of an interest to Fountain Hills. He said that he sponsored a bill regarding the duty to report potential sexual abuse to children. Now, if a supervisor learns of abuse they must report it as well as the others already required to do so. The next bill, critical health information, gives a town council the ability to pass an ordinance to create a mechanism to place a decal on a car which would indicate to first responders that they have a medical condition and information on that condition will be available in the glove compartment. Another of his bills is animal cruelty which increased the penalty for extreme penalty to animals from a Class 6 to a Class 5 felony. The reason for this was that as a Class 6 felony (the lowest) they were able to sometimes reduce charges to a misdemeanor; now they cannot do that. They increased the types of records on which public officers could remove identifying information. Political signs for ballot measures, also his bill, was to add the loophole for tampering with ballot measures signs which previously only applied to candidate political signs. He said that another bill has to do with municipal elections, stating that a write-in candidate Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 3 of 23 cannot advance to the general election ballot unless they received at least the same number of voters as signatures required on petitions. Another bill allows residents to go through the initiative process to impose term limits on election officials. Another election bill has changed the date of the Primary Election from the end of August to the first Tuesday of August, allowing more time for county recorders to do their work. Another of his bills was the online lodging and local taxation. This allows local municipalities to collect taxes on short-term rentals. The bill on TPT residential rentals requires that renters received first class mail notification if the sales tax rental fee increases. Tax Provisions Omnibus, in line with the Wayfair decision, now allows local municipalities to tax out-of-state vendors if there are more than $200,000 in sales with annual increases. The next is a change in the building code, requiring an adult changing table in large renovations. His premier bill, is the short-term rental regulations. He said that three years ago the legislature dropped all restrictions for things such as AirBnB which caused chaos. He said that Fountain Hills has had a lot of problems with party houses, and in Sedona 30% of their City is rental properties. He said that this jacked up long-term rentals and pretty much eliminated the ability of workers in Sedona to rent housing. He said that this bill takes care of the major abuses, to get rid of party houses, and provides for escalating fines for repeat nuisance ordinance violations. He said that they wanted to go farther, but this is a start. They also reinstated the State Parks Heritage Fund, although they did not fund it at this time. They adopted the statewide ban on texting while driving. As far as what is coming up, he plans to continue addressing the abuse on short-term rentals and expand the restrictions. Another major bill he wants is to create a website that lists the names of those people convicted of extreme animal cruelty to make sure people that are privately selling animals, as well as stores and breeders, do not sell to those individuals. Senator Ugenti-Rita then came forward and thanked the Council for the opportunity to address them. She said that one of her niches is that she enjoys constituent bills. She said that this last year they were fortunate to be in a robust economy with regard to the budget, but they do have to be careful because with increased revenue there is an appetite for increased spending. Her posture for the next session in this regard is that for any offset with revenues they have to have a tax cut. They passed a regulatory reform bill to eliminate the requirement to obtain permission for someone to blow dry someone's hair. She said that the $32 VLT tax should have never happened. The way it happened violated their process, so they got that repealed. Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 4 of 23 She said that her big topic area is election bills to protect the voter and election integrity. Today she testified at a US committee on election integrity which was a very lively discussion. Representative Jay Lawrence then came forward stating that he also ran the VLT bill, but Senator Ugenti's passed. He, along with others, helped with the wild horse bill. If someone now wears and hood or mask when committing any kind of crime, the judge can enhance the penalty. He's the chairman for the Military Veterans Affair Committee. He ran a bill that 90 people signed onto and was signed by the Governor, dealing with veteran suicide, to track those veterans without naming them, helping find a commonality to help fight against it. He said that a bill came before the Judiciary Committee that allows a doctor who performs a late-term abortion and the baby lives, it is up to the doctor to keep the body alive. They brought a bill before them saying that the doctor should not provide aide. Councilmember Tolis thanked them for their time in the Legislature and all they do. At the beginning of this year he brought up the issue of online sales. He thinks that for Fountain Hills, Amazon and many others that are taking away from retail sales, needs to have a tracking mechanism, with accountability for the large companies. He said that there is a lot of wear and tear on the streets. He asked that they address the issue of tracking those sales. Representative Kavanagh said that a large amount of the online sales are done through the larger suppliers which are easier to track and will be tracked by the Department of Revenue. He said that there is another organization that works with other states that tracks the information of smaller sellers so those identified as "bad actors"will probably be a bad actor in Arizona. Representative Lawrence said that the other bill he will be presenting in the coming year is a sanctuary city bill which will make it illegal to be a sanctuary city. Councilmember Magazine said that teachers are leaving in droves and being replaced with uncertified teachers. He hoped that the Legislature will take it under advisement and address that issue. Representative Kavanagh said that was a budget issue and they are all very proud of the fact that over the last three years they have given half of all new revenues to K-12 and the universities. They also did the salary increases of 20% over three years and that was well appreciated and deserved. Councilmember Magazine asked how they reconcile increases in revenues without giving more to the schools. A 20% increase sounds good, but from a low base. He said that Arizona is 49th in the country. Representative Kavanagh said that when they discount certain handicaps they have such as the large number of non-English speaking students, if they look at the performance of their students, they are in the middle of the country. He said that this year they have $250 million projected in new ongoing revenue, and would predict that, true to form, half of that will go to the K-12 and universities. Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 5 of 23 Representative Lawrence said that $15 million went to the Arizona Teachers Academy and $400,000 for the Quality Teacher Pilot Program. He said that they spent millions in addition to the 2020 raise and all republicans and only one democrat voted for it; all the other democrats voted against it. Mayor Dickey reminded the senator and representatives that they will be looking to the Legislature to help renew Prop 400, the transportation planning bill, and she hoped that when they get around to do that they will give it some consideration. Mayor Dickey said that Census Day is April 1, 2020, and whatever they can all do to get them counted, it is very important. She reminded them of the League's resolutions adopted this year, and hoped that they will support those issues in the next session. 6. CALL TO THE PUBLIC Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.01(H), public comment is permitted(not required)on matters NOT listed on the agenda.Any such comment(i)must be within the jurisdiction of the Council, and(ii)is subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The Council will not discuss or take legal action on matters raised during Call to the Public unless the matters are properly noticed for discussion and legal action.At the conclusion of the Call to the Public, individual councilmembers may(i)respond to criticism, (ii) ask staff to review a matter, or(iii)ask that the matter be placed on a future Council agenda. Pam Aguilu, Fountain Hills resident, addressed the Council and audience reminding everyone that they need to be polite to one another and give people a chance to say what they want without being booed or hissed. She said that many have lived in town with a beautiful view that may be missed, but that is life. It is time to say yes to new revenue so they can take care of their streets and be fiscally responsible for the whole community. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine, noncontroversial matters and will be enacted by one motion of the Council. All motions and subsequent approvals of consent items will include all recommended staff stipulations unless otherwise stated. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a councilmember or member of the public so requests. If a councilmember or member of the public wishes to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda, he/she may request so prior to the motion to accept the Consent Agenda or with notification to the Town Manager or Mayor prior to the date of the meeting for which the item was scheduled. The items will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. MOVED BY Councilmember Dennis Brown, SECONDED BY Councilmember Alan Magazine to approve consent Agenda Item 7-A. Vote: 7 - 0 Passed - Unanimously A. CONSIDERATION OF approval of the minutes of the Special Meeting of September 17, 2019; and the Regular Meeting of September 17, 2019. 8. REGULAR AGENDA A. Daybreak Development: i. Public Hearing Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 6 of 23 Mayor Dickey opened the Public Hearing. Development Services Director John Wesley came forward and began a PowerPoint presentation to address the following: REQUESTS GPA Minor Rezone LOCATION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA FOR REVIEW BACKGROUND GENERAL PLAN LANGUAGE REVIEW QUESTIONS SUMMARY Councilmember Scharnow said that given the fact that it is already zoned commercial, with the raw land prices, he asked if it was feasible in the development world to buy that higher-priced land and then put in single-family homes. He would think that would have been done already. Mr. Wesley said that single family may not work with the pricing of the land, but it would be appropriate for the land use. Councilmember Scharnow asked if it was appropriate for the Council to amend the general plan, but continue negotiations on the project. Mr. Wesley said that it is the Council's prerogative; it they are certain that multifamily residential is the best use. Discussion was held on the whether multifamily should be used as a buffer between residential and commercial. Mr. Wesley said that there is no commercial piece with this development. Councilmember Scharnow said that it is a major arterial and there is commercial directly across the street. Mayor Dickey noted that the General Plan is developed with extensive public involvement. When they do it they have professional planners assist with its development and then it is ratified by the voters. If they were going to change the land use, she thought it would behoove them to have it for a specific project. She would caution them in doing that. She read from the lodging section of the General Plan that reads, "these sites are to be developed in a highly sensitive manner...." She said that if they do not change the General Plan, then those protections would remain with the property. Mayor Dickey said that in the report they talked about if they were going to change the General Plan, they should put exceptional design enhanced amenities. She did not see a recommendation in the beginning, but now she does. Mr. Wesley said that as staff worked on the staff report and went through the numerous variations of the project, they ended with a recommendation. Councilmember Spelich asked for clarification. From what he reads, they are saying that the number of units, per that footprint, are being calculated on the entire area. It seems like they are using the entire plot to figure the number of density when they are only building on 23 acres. Mr. Wesley said that he would get into that further on the zoning presentation. Councilmember Tolis asked Mr. Wesley for his definition of"exceptional." Mr. Wesley said that has always been a bit of a challenge. Mr. Wesley then began the Rezoning Request presentation which addressed: Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 7 of 23 REZONING OVERVIEW ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN CONCERNS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Councilmember Magazine asked why a traffic signal was being proposed. Mr. Wesley said that the traffic report did include information on traffic counts. Councilmember Magazine said that the idea of a traffic circle does not appeal to him. Mr. Wesley said that it is what was proposed to address some of the citizen concerns. He noted that this was just a preliminary design. The Town Engineer did have some concerns with the grade and it would impact the project in requiring additional fill. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — Parking - MFU Mr. Wesley reviewed the parking, noting that the applicant has proposed a slight modified standard based on a study they did of other sites in Fountain Hills as well as surrounding communities.The Town Code requires 563 and they are proposing 481, a difference of 82 spaces. He said that this was not a big concern for staff; however, in the long term it could create some issues in terms of exceptional amenities. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS— Parking — MFR Discussion was held on the lack of parking in the 55+ portion of the project. Mr. Wesley said that he would like to study this issue further. What he has seen is similar to other developments. Councilmember Brown said that every project coming before Council in the past 15 years has had an issue with parking. He has heard for 15 years that Fountain Hills requires more parking than other communities. Councilmember Scharnow said that for the Keystone project staff was willing to have parking out on Westby. This project it seems like staff is making an issue that the spaces are under. He asked why the dichotomy. Mr. Wesley said that in terms of number in the unrestricted area, there is not a big concern. If it does turn out to be inadequate, the development itself will be less desirable. Mr. Wesley said that within the age restricted area, they are proposing one parking space per unit, which seems to be a reasonable number. The concern staff has is with the distribution of those spaces. The townhomes have two-car garages, which leaves 76 spaces for 105-106. However, in the development agreement they indicate that they will be providing a shuttle service. They have also indicated on the site where landscaping could be turned into additional parking, if it is needed. He has not been able to review that. Councilmember Magazine said that it suggests that people in their 70's and 80's do not need more than one space. He and his wife have three vehicles. Mr. Wesley said that part of the concern from staff is that there will be some level of staff and visitors taking some of those parking spaces. Councilmember Brown said that he, too, has several vehicles but if he was going to move into that development he probably would not be able to maintain that number. He thinks that the parking issue is not a big deal. Mayor Dickey asked if it was fair to say that staff looks at particular projects and comes up with a position on parking. Mr. Wesley said that the Town's ordinance is dated. It does not Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 8 of 23 have anything to deal with senior or assisted facilities. He said that each project is unique. The ordinance is the ordinance unless they go through something like this that allows Council to consider a different standard. It is the developer's perspective that they will have enough parking. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS —CUT AND FILL Councilmember Magazine asked why they could not have 15 to 20 feet of fill, rather than what is being proposed. Councilmember Brown said that Firerock and Adero both had 27' cuts. The difference between those and this project is that there will not be four million yards of dirt being transported down the roads. They are making the lot balance. Regardless of what the use, Council would be seeing the same presentation because they need to have a piece of ground that is buildable. Councilmember Scharnow noted that the roadbed itself for Palisades does not have a natural slope. Town Engineer Randy Harrel said that there was a considerable amount of fill brought in for Palisades in the 1990's. The slopes there are not natural. Some have 50-60 feet of fill. Mr. Harrel said that they worked with the developers on the entrances and staff proposed moving the one to better line up with existing streets. He said that if a traffic signal was installed, it would be coordinated with the Shea/Palisades signal. Councilmember Brown said that they have tried forever to get a traffic circle near Town Hall; he is not sure why people object to them. The state likes them, the county likes them, he sees a huge benefit as it would allow Summit people to come and go and would slow down traffic on Palisades north and south, which he sees as a plus. Councilmember Magazine asked if they have comparative information on demographics on how many work and do not work. CUT AND FILL SLOPE/LANDSCAPE APPLICANT MODIFICATIONS STAFF ANALYSIS Mr. Wesley said that density has been an ongoing question—whether it should be based on the 23 acres or 60 acres. He said that it is a 60-acre site and they can move densities around to one location. Staff has looked at the PAD as being for 60 acres. Some may look at it differently. Councilmember Magazine asked if they have an updated design, as required in the "upgraded design and amenities." Mr. Wesley said that they have not seen much in the way of details on the amenities. The design is minimal; not bad, but not exceptional at this point. Vice Mayor Leckrone asked if this was the complete list, or if there were other things that would be required as well. Mr. Wesley said that this was the list. Mayor Dickey said that if they take the density that way it does not seem like it would be a minor general plan amendment. She asked how that would not generate a major general plan amendment. Mr. Wesley said there are a few ways of determining density. If they had asked that the entire 60 acres be changed to multifamily residential it would have been, but they had up until 40 acres for multifamily before it would become a major amendment. They are only building on 26 acres. Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 9 of 23 Councilmember Magazine said that there is a development in Town that, in his opinion and those of others, does not have proper colors. He asked what responsibility the Town has in working with the development on that aspect. Mr. Wesley said that Chapter 19 lists preferences in terms of color. Councilmember Magazine asked who selected the colors of Park Place. Mayor Dickey asked if that was something that could be spelled out in the development agreement. Mr. Wesley said that it is not currently in the development agreement, but if that is a concern it could be considered. SUMMARY Councilmember Scharnow said that the details are lacking and they need more approvals and reviews at the staff level. He asked if this was normal to not have more detail at this point. Mr. Wesley said that because there are not a lot of sites like this in town, they do have a big project and it becomes very expensive to go into a design detail before they get their final approvals. For a project this size, it is not unusual to see it broken down like this. Councilmember Scharnow asked if they could stipulate that the detail comes back through the Commission and Town Council for approval. Mayor Dickey said that the development would not go to Planning and Zoning Commission. If they got to that point, the work on the development agreement would be just the Council. Councilmember Spelich said that he would be interested to find out if the traffic study done considered the 1500 parking space garage at CopperWynd and Adero Canyon and the amount of traffic that is going to be generated by the resort. Mr. Harrel said that the traffic report did project increased traffic based on MAG standards, and that takes into account all of the projected infrastructure and building in the future; it does not cover specific projects. Mr. Miller said that it did not specifically include Copperwynd, but MAG has modeling software and the Town provided them traffic counts and development. All of the cities/towns use the MAG numbers. Mayor Dickey said that she does have faith in the MAG projections, but she asked if it was possible that MAG may not have known about this exact project. Mr. Wesley said that the development agreement is straight forward compared to others. It primarily reiterates what is in the PAD. Councilmember Scharnow said that they have had grading and blasting on other projects. He asked how it is regulated and what the procedure is. Mr. Wesley said that the soils study was done a number of years ago and they only went down 10 feet. They will be going down 30 feet. They do not know what they will find and it may require blasting. Part of their submission will include more details in the future. Councilmember Scharnow said that one letter writer recently said that the developer had asked to waive $1 million in development fees, and he asked if that was true. Mr. Wesley said that he was not aware of such a request. Councilmember Spelich said that he would be interested to know who was on the hook if there is structural damage done to existing homes from the blasting. Mr. Arnson said that it would not be the Town. Councilmember Brown said that there is a procedure that builders go through when blasting. Before any occurred, they would go to all residences within 750 feet and they will monitor it closely. He said that he had the privilege of building some of the casinos in Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 10 of 23 Cripple Creek. They could blast a foundation and not even show a vibration on the building beside it. He said that it is so well managed and organized that in Firerock, where they were blasting within 300 feet, there was no damage at all. Any damage would be on the developer. Councilmember Tolis asked if it was fair to say that if this project were the resort, they would be asking the same questions with regard to traffic and blasting. Mr. Wesley replied that they would. Councilmember Tolis said that the way the current zoning code is written, they will either move forward or deny. Then another developer would have to go through the same process. Ultimately they will either resolve the challenges or the project is never going to be built. Councilmember Brown said that if they were to deny the project, every developer in the valley will know that they have denied a viable project in Fountain Hills, and if they think they will come back in the future, they are mistaken. Vice Mayor Leckrone told the audience that she has heard all of them and read all of the e-mails. She asked for the courtesy to share their thoughts. She said that it is a very difficult project and 50% of them are not going to be happy with whatever decision is made. Councilmember Scharnow said that they will be hearing tonight that the proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood. He asked Mr. Wesley if, in his professional opinion, he would say that a resort is compatible. Mr. Wesley said that there are different ways to look at that. There is a buffer between the uses. The overall scale and massiveness needs to be looked at. The lodging facility was a pretty massive development, but it wrapped around the hill and fit into it. He said that is somewhat subjective, but the separation helps with whatever the use might be. Councilmember Magazine said that not all of the e-mails were polite and a lot of them objected to apartments. Some talked of not wanting "riffraff' near them. Councilmember Brown said that 20 years ago when they did a preliminary submittal they had to bring in a full set of engineered drawings to Fountain Hills on any commercial building. At that point in time, these people would have had to spend $1/2 million just to submit. Looking at their preliminary design, he asked if they are going to bring back a full set of elevations and colors. If the answer was not yes, he would struggle with saying it was all okay. He said that they have been around long enough to know the hoops they are going to have to jump through. A break was held from 7:49 p.m. to 8:02 p.m. Paul Gilbert, representing the developer, along with Neil and Jeremy, said that he would first go over the project, then Greg Vogel would speak and then Jeremy Hall. He then began a PowerPoint presentation, Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. PROPOSAL With regard to density, Mr. Gilbert said that he has been doing this for 45 years and never in his career has he seen a project that had open space as part of the PAD, that did not count the entire property when counting the density. He said that open space is a major factor in determining the quality and exceptional aspect of the project. He said that 77% of their project is open space. He said that he has represented MCO out in Fountain Hills for a lot of years and they will find very few projects with that percentage of open space. They are allowed to disturb up to Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 11 of 23 40 acres and still be a minor amendment, and they are only disturbing 26. Mr. Gilbert said that they have submitted over 400 signatures on petitions in support of the project, the opposition has more. Many that signed their petition said they did not like what is going on. They are before Council with a solid base of support from the Town. RESORT STYLE LIVING He said that they have been criticized for not having as many amenities. This project has good and more than sufficient amenities, and are willing to increase those amenities. With regard to architecture, he thinks that it meets the "exceptional" standard. He then compared the drawing with other developments in town. He said that they are very flexible with regard to colors. They tried to take the desert hue and use the outline in the design guidelines, but they are not wed to them. PROJECT RENDERING With regard to the General Plan, Mr. Gilbert said that they justify a minor amendment with this project. Much of the language presented tonight comes from the staff report itself. CHAPTER 1 — Introduction MISSION STATEMENT Strive for diversity in neighborhood...natural environment Have more open space...less disturbance Housing trends GOAL 5—"...and preserve existing neighborhood from incompatible adjacent land uses" He said that if this hearing turns out like that of the Planning and Zoning Commission, they will hear a theme that "this development is incompatible with adjacent land uses."The staff report confirms that this development meets the standard. HOTEL NOT FEASIBLE Mr. Gilbert said that the General Plan has to be kept current every ten years. They are suggesting that a hotel is not feasible and then reviewed the reasons for that statement. He said that in the staff report for the General Plan, staff states that multifamily use for this property is a proper use. He then reviewed different views of the project compared with views of the proposed resort. PROPOSED DAYBREAK VS. APPROVED CONFERENCE HOTEL IMPROVED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IMPROVEMENT OVER HOTEL TO NEIGHBORS Mayor Dickey questioned the 77% of open space. Mr. Gilbert clarified that their open space included not only the open space surrounding the development, but landscaping within the project. STIPULATIONS Mr. Gilbert said that the Fountain Hills ordinance says that a developer can submit a plan in concept. They have gone beyond that, but they are within what the ordinance allows. Mr. Wesley said that if they approve the project, staff would like to see a list of stipulations, and Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 12 of 23 they have agreed to abide by all of those. He said in between the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and tonight, they have met with Mr. Wesley and gone through the entire section of the ordinance, line by line. He said that their agreement is not an agreement in ignorance, by with what is exactly in the ordinance and what Mr. Wesley says is required. In order to comply, they have to come back with another plan and they will do that. He said that they met with the neighbors to try and come to agreement, but it was not successful. In listening to the neighbors, they agreed to eliminate the assisted living component, provide a roundabout or traffic signal, and provide a shuttle. Additionally, he met with Mr. Wesley to show him where they can pick up additional parking spaces if they are needed. Greg Vogel, CEO of Land Advisors, then addressed the Council stating that he is the advisor to this site and has been for over seven years. They do have a lot of experience; altogether he has 32 years of experience and they are now the largest land brokerage company. They have worked on resort and resort sites. NEW RESORTS He said that they know what makes resorts work and it is not happening without golf, a casino, etc. They have spoken with flag companies such as Marriott, etc. and the brands were not interested. He said that they have busted through this in every direction and have not delivered one offer in seven years. The only thing that they could see is the use being proposed. There may be other uses, but it may be something that the Town does not want to see. At one time there was talk of a big box at this location. At this time, Jeremy Hall came forward and reviewed the main objections to Daybreak. MAIN OBJECTIONS TO DAYBREAK "Daybreak will hurt my property value" This site is approved for a five-story hotel There is no empirical evidence to support that multifamily hurts residential property values The more diverse the housing is in an area the better "Daybreak is way too dense" Will be the lowest of any other multifamily project approved in Fountain Hills to date "Traffic from Daybreak will be unsafe" A traffic study by CIVTECH Engineers was approved by the Town At peak, it increases to three trips per minute Only 16% additional traffic to Palisades Daybreak meets all ASHTO traffic standards Similar count as hotel, but without special event spikes "The senior living is under parked" In independent living facilities oftentimes residents give up their automobiles Fountain Hills does not have a parking standard for independent living With regard to the prior comment that the townhomes have two parking spaces, the garages are designed to lock off to allow for other residents to utilize them if not used by the townhome residents. Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 13 of 23 "There is too much hillside cut" Previous zoning has already approved a 30-foot cut Similar cuts have been approved in other recent projects Westridge Village was a similar site and was flattened more "There is too much hillside fill and they're filling in the washes" Previous zoning has already approved a 30-foot fill for 23 acres The additional fill is limited to small area at southern entry drive They are not filling major washes At the very deepest part there is 57 feet of fill, primarily due to the cut for Palisades "We don't need more apartments" There is a shift in household formation Own vs. Rent NO DEVELOPMENT IS NOT AN OPTION WHY SHOULD THE TOWN SUPPORT DAYBREAK ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Mayor Dickey then invited speakers forward. The following individuals spoke in favor of the development: •Rick Ponzo -Sharon Morgan •Cassie Hansen -Charles Bosnos •Andi Bell -Dori Wittig -Linda Kavanagh •Lina Belliner Comments received included: •Thank you for all of the effort being put in -The Council is looking out for what is best for Fountain Hills •What they are proposing with Daybreak is beneficial for the Town •They have to work together to make it the best project •Fully supports Daybreak -If former mayors and councils would have listened to all NIMBY's they would not have the Fountain Hills they have today •They wouldn't have Firerock, Sunridge, Community Center, -Make decision based on what is best for Fountain Hills -Much has been said on social media and the newspaper that apartments bring low-lifes and second-class citizens -She owned a home and after her husband died, chose to rent and she does not consider herself low-life or a second-class citizen -Base your decision on facts and benefits, not the dream of keeping it open space forever -The developer has compromised on everything requested of staff -Opponents have misrepresented this as "Park Place on steroids" -She voted against Park Place because she felt it was one story too high, architectural issues, etc. but it is 93% occupied -Studies show that apartments are in high demand by all ages -Attractive plan but aesthetically it needs some fine tuning (color, architectural style) 'They will attract renters to this development that may eventually buy in Fountain Hills Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 14 of 23 •This development will help with the shopping center where Fry's is located -Both national and Fountain Hills statistics show that apartment rental demand is soaring -Many people 55-60 want to sell their home and just rent •Everyone that built around this development since 2007 should have known it was zoned for a five-story resort •To eliminate some of the excess commercial zoning downtown, Plat 208 was rezoned, now providing 500 new residents to that area. 'Fountain Hills needs more young people; they need diversity of families and it is hard for them to get a foothold •They have been told for years that the Town needed a new revenue source; the primary property tax was voted down tourism projects were proposed and people did not like them; rental income is steady and gives the Town a steadfast revenue 'Families oftentimes rent; when they lost Four Peaks Apartments to Condos, the next year the school district lost 200 students 'Business community needs more people to sustain their businesses -Daybreak will be in compliance with the Dark Sky Ordinance; a resort will not -Jeremy Hall and his business are the epitome of trustworthiness -The developers are cooperating to reach higher standards for the community • Daybreak was designed with a heart and soul and mission to keep community standards 'Currently there are only 23 homes under $325,000 and of that only three are single-family • How many other long-time residents have been faced with finding a smaller home or rental? Comment cards were received from the following individuals in support of the development: Kathy Ruebusch, Janet Amaral, Bill and Terry Larkin, Alice Novoty, Sharron Grzybowski, Petitions in support of the project were submitted (Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof). The following individuals spoke against the development: -Bob Courtney, President of Westridge Homeowners Association -Robert Hahn -Stephen Messel 'Barbara Goldstein -Emily Hemphill -Erica West -Michael Webb -Anne Traynor •Georgeanna Zoros -Stephanie Czopp •Scott Seidler 'Reggie Court -Larry Goldstein -Patricia Green -Christian Webb -Nancy Stevens -Kristin Skivington -Michelle Webb -Tim LaSota -Denise Ricketts -Carol Kelso -Karen Bishop •Larry Hering -Phil Parrish Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 15 of 23 •Larry Meyers •Kenneth Gibbs Comments received included: •The plan is inadequate; a complete plan should be brought back through the entire process again •Speed limit on Palisades is not followed •Now talking about a roundabout or traffic light close to Shea; should be at the north entrance •45% of cars and trucks coming in and out of town use Palisades; this development will compound that •The entrance into the development is so dangerous the developer is now talking about installing a roundabout (like the one in Scottsdale near Costco) -Should require the enter/exit lanes to be located within the development -Stated objective of developer is to provide rental income with 400 apartments, 270 of which are not age restricted with average rent around $1,750. The other 130 will be age-restricted with rents of$5,500 or higher providing two meals a day, transportation, entertainment, hair salon, movie theater, pool, bocce court, library, everything associated with assisted living -Why would young people want to live next to those in independent living? •This is one of the last areas available in town for development of a resort -Resorts provide one job for each guest room—over 200 jobs -Does not agree that there has to be a golf course for the modern traveler to want to stay at a resort -Stick with careful planning A break was taken from 10:00 p.m. to 10:12 p.m. •Their town is about natural beauty, serenity and open space •Don't vote to destroy God's work on a gamble -Be patient; be smart •Vice President of accounting and finance for a local resort -Multifamily housing is the lowest revenue generator; will be losing $431,000 a year and losing employment potential -Let the new Economic Development Director work on getting a resort to that location •Lives in Westridge and not opposed to development •Multifamly should be encouraged to be close to town centers •There are good senior living providers and predatory ones -This property is the grand entrance into Fountain Hills -Daybreak's proposal will increase land traffic -The Council is opposed to the changes to FAA flight patterns -The Council has already approved a single-family residential rental development in downtown near Ace Hardware; they will be shopping nearby •The Daybreak development does not have restaurants or shopping nearby •Noise levels will rise -Before they bought their property they were told there may be a boutique hotel at this location •Developer's motivation is money and profit •His family lives in Fountain Hills; he just bought a townhome in the Arcadia area because he wanted to live near people his age -The developers are not going to be able to bring millenials to Daybreak •There is no walkability and no social life -Fountain Hills contains different communities, but within a broader community of Fountain Hills Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 16 of 23 •This development is a quick fix for revenue but has long-term impacts •Work with a local 501C3 to purchase the property and deed it to another entity •The Development Services Director was recommending denial of this development in the beginning and she wonders why it has changed when no changes in their submittal have occurred She is also speaking for 135 people; she called people from all over the town to get their opinions -Concerns with infrastructure, water supply, traffic, etc. •He was representing homeowners in The Summit and the burden is on the applicant to justify their request for change in zoning and they are coming back with the commitments after the fact -Was at a recent seminar where Bill Gray spoke about the appreciation of property in Paradise Valley being at 6%, while it is only 2% in Fountain Hills because of the lack of jobs in Fountain Hills -Served six years as a state representative in Wisconsin and served four years as an elected county executive who had a planning department reporting to her and also ten years as President of the Brown County/Green Bay Planning Commission -She is a good government person; they need a development plan -They are requesting 13 exceptions to the General Plan -Critical to look at the development agreement; they are being given ten years •They are giving us a one-year guarantee for all of the improvements •The development agreement does not address the need to pay all development fees -Prop 207 is being weighed by everyone •I think there's a shuffle going on; this is going to be assisted living -His mother has been in four different homes over 14 years -Quoted Councilmember Tolis regarding the schools and the need to increase business -Quoted the Economic Development Director regarding the Science Discovery Center -Keystone had its act together and presented what was required with no exceptions Ms. Burke reported that between speaker cards, comment cards and petitions, they received 408 in favor of the development and 678 opposed as indicated herein. Comment cards and petitions opposed to the development were received from: Jim Mathews, Suzanne M. Bertino, James Buxtan, Karin Bishop, Marisa Phillippi, Pete Lucchere, Christa Lucchere, Dennis DuBose, Tom Haeberer, Sheila Corzine, Marti Parrish, Kathy Paterson, Art Patterson, Arnold Dulak, Susan Owens, Diana Lee Mary, Lee Stedgrave, Marianne Kulekowski, G. Zingsheim, Sharon DuBose, Ruth Welbarn, Maria Gregory, Andrea Bioletto, Jessica Rintala, Gerald Morgan, Elizabeth George, Loren Edwards, Sandy Beggs, Harry M. Berss, Deborah DeRose, Linda Frisk, Richard Hippner, Judith Hippner, Yossi Czopp, Judy Weir, Carl Weir, Alice Naskey, Beth Court, Sandy Schmitt, Therrin Clark, Joy Bummes, Linda Cronin, Joyce Hansen, Sandy Clark, Ron Grabowski, Harry Hunter, Robin Hunter, Joan Schultz, Robert Schultz, Bud Kramer, Vincent DeRose, Debrah DeRose, Pat Rousseau, Al Rousseau, Barbara Timmers, Larry Timmers, Nat Van Kuron, Judi Van Kuren, Merry Jones, Cari Grifo, Paula Grifo, Nancy Jones Dwyer, Madge Joyce, Joe Joyce, Alice Prybycin, Jerry Prybycin, Jane Ziegler, Mike Ziegler, Paula Kuyat Mason, Dorothy Verbal, Claude Verbal, Beverly Quinn, Dennis Dowbing, Judy Conrad, Adam D'Raefeal, Courtney Stob, Larry Mallek, Mary Lou Crane, Suzanne Luzinski, Cheryl Lansing, Ron Lansing, Dove Huggins, Julie Tribbery, Tamara DiBois, Dan Danowski, Russell Bonagade, Marilyn Campbell, Thomas Campbell, Donm Bender, Sue Anger, Russ Anger, Jim Winn, Nancy Chaimson, Elaine Dowling, Caroline Hansen, Alan Crane, Kim Mergen, Tom Mergen, Gary Gremo, Darvel Hansen, Diana Mallek, Robert Black, Stule Bergeson, Carol Bender, Patt Wells, Nancy Tueit, Leigh Bushman, lone Bushman, Crystall Ebbinga, Sheila Nichols, Margaret Melanski, Jim Bertucci, Will Watson, Carol Quin, Kait Buschmann, Martha Cranson, Sally Buschmann, Sharon Black, Ted Black, Bob Budd, Judy Budd, Cathy Bertucci, Richard Craven, Regina Seojbowski, Lynn Singer, Charles Melanski, Richard Brooks, Kathy Brooks, Rosemqary Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 17 of 23 Boagude, Joanne Wukter, Ron Heit, Rich Pitman, Beth Pitman, Sandra Schmitt, Carma Blackburn, Kristi Kane, Fran Intervallo, Darline Leader, Robert Watson, Lou Slojkowski, Ron Wells, Patricia Wainwright, Micki Klos, Reed Connelly, Vicki Marsten, Dave Fields, Patti Fields, Monica Starck, Dan Starck, Gary Timmers, Gloria Kramer, William Parsons, Barbara Cardinal, Joyce Stelink, Lynn Anderson, Fred Anderson, Richard Farysthe, Patricia Forysthe, Robert Struve, Linda Strive, Steve Conrad, Al Siebel, Shirley Grabowski, Sandy Kousc, Pat Bressner, Clairs Padelford, Dan Padelford, Barb Cruz, Pauline Morris, John Morris, Linda Kester, Dennis Kester, Barbara Cale, Robert Cale, Mohammad Alomari, Bethany Berkseth, Analyda Shooks, Joe and Beth Marino, Bara & Philip Sargenti, Jayne Wrier, Maria Petton, Laura Crane, Murray Jones, Pete Pennell, Greg and Addioe Brandelanz, Bob Hawkinson, Louis Walters, Dave Coates, Gail Hallstrom Pape, Tim Taylor, Rose Hansford, Nancy Siebert, Laura Crane, Lori Coates, Greg Woo, Terri Blatchford, Katharine A. Cobin, Bill Fawner, Alice Fawner, Gail Christensen, Bryan Barkley, Steve Kern, Karen Kern, Doug Kurzydlo, Dennis Tam, Yayoi Baskind, James Baskind, Paul Baskind, Robert Baskind, Cathay Fischer, Bery Fischer, Pete Brock, Jeff Poynter, Angelita Serrano Vargas, James Seyb, Barbara Moore, Jerry Greene, Dave Studer, Lyn Lajiness, David Lajiness, Kenneth Gibbs, Wendy Ann Saint, Marjorie Laks, Robert Humel, Michele Erickson, Brenda Haeberer, Linda Bennehoff, Brenda Badenherst, Abel Bandenhurst, James R. Erickson, Candace Goodwin, Richard Rench, Melissa Vuksanovic, Robert Purinton, Joanne Dunleary, James Fenalley, Ruth Ann Smith, Wesley Smith, Shirley Fischer, Mary Beth Finlay, Scott Finlay, Craig Dicker, Trish Dicker, Wendie Waddell, Roc Caldarella, Nancy Scimone, Stephen Seimore, Kathy Rock, Lori Lavender, Sari Lewis, Keith Lawson, Vince Ritchie, Anne Larkin, Vincent Larkin, Tony Reimawn, Margo Morgan, Jim Morgan, Evan Sutton, Jennifer Dueker, Donnie Duecker, Diana Dueker, Sara Foster, Gabe Foster, Lisa Sutton, Rose Ann Sutton, Lyman Sutton, Karen Klaassen, Tom Haeberer, Cynthia Zagurski, Sherry Irwin, Bob Jarobins, Anita Rock, Dominick LaBate, Esther Jacobins, Marty Courtney, Ken Rock, Don Irwin, Barbara Adams, Karen Zubert, Linda Frisk, Lucinda Cords, Michael Cords, Maggie Iverson, Dennis Iverson, David Vuksunovic, Arlene Mehok, John Mehok, Peter Wilk, Linda Wilk, Barbara Peck, Kathleen Geiger, Daniel Geiger, Robert Brickway, Shirley E. Brickway, Holly Messel, Beth Court, Dcharles W. Stevens, Patty Reyes, Art Reyes, Vicki Sanders, Preston Sanders, Michae4l G. Lewis, James C. Green, Eileen Lewis, Liz Hahn, David Lonin, Donna Lyons, William Lyons, Helen Houck, John Houck, Renee Seidler, Tracy Hurley, Norman Hurley, Barbara Hadland, Gary Barries, Teresa Russo-Cox, Terry D. Cox, Mary Endorf, Verlena Lynn Endsef, Christa Kennedy Lucchere, Pete Lucchere, Cindy Mattish, Elise Cash, Bruce Cash, Susan Jackson, Barbara Thahman, Bunny Conley, Carol Malinski, Robert Langer, Diana Langer, Josh A. Loyny, Al Cornell, Peggy Gauthier, Charles P. Gauthier, Johanna M. Gonce, James T. Gonce, Charlotte Kasabuski, Dianna Pierce, John Pierce, Joan L. Morrison, David C. Morrison, Kristin Bio, Christina e. Abid, Daniel Treynor, Mustafa Elabin, Anna El Abid, Lonny Rosen, Terru Lyons, Dan Berg, Morton Mitchelle, Jean Harris, Shelly Richardson, Karen Huske, Terri Cargala, Liam Beaner, Yvonne Shields, Ron Base, Brendan McCarthy, Jim Skivington, Nath Brock, Jerry Winters, Judy Hines, Jodie Winters, E. M. Latham III, Linda Bauerle, Don Scott, Kyrsta Nangi, and Sharon Latham. Petitions in opposition to the development (Exhibit D attached hereto) were submitted. Mayor Dickey closed the public hearing at this time. Vice Mayor Leckrone asked the developers if they wished to rebuke anything said by the prior land use attorney from California. She also asked why they were asking for 55+ housing. Mr. Gilbert said that the land use attorney from California was questioning why they were not complying with the General Plan. He said that they were not, which is why they were requesting a minor amendment to the General Plan, which is permitted through the zoning code. 1-le would leave the answer on why they were including the 55+ to be Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 18 of 23 answered by Mr. Hall. Mr. Hall said that they will have two separate communities, gated separately. They felt that 400 units of garden apartments was too many for a community this size. They felt that 270 was more of the right size and with 52% of the existing population being over 55 years of age, they are adding the 55+ units. Vice Mayor Leckrone asked Mr. Hall if their intention was to develop the property or sell it. Mr. Hall said that their intention was to develop. They will stay with the project until it is complete. Mr. Brown said that makes a huge difference to him. He said that if they were going to turn it over to another group to do the building, he would be concerned, such as with Summit that is 15 years old and still not complete. Mr. Hall said that a rental project like this is all done at one time. Councilmember Magazine said that it was stated that if this was approved, only staff would deal with the development agreement. Mr. Miller said that is the typical process. He said that if the Council makes changes, staff will ensure it is done that way. He said that the development agreement has a lot of references to the PAD. Councilmember Magazine asked what the process is for collecting the development fees. Mr. Arnson said that it is spelled out in the development agreement at Section 7.10, "payment...all applicable charges prior to issuance of permits. Mr. Ginsberg said that he was involved with Copperwynd from 2007 to 2015. They also built Ridgeview Apartments in the mid 1990's and were with them until three years ago. He said that their record speaks for itself. Councilmember Scharnow said that the original PAD submittal, exhibit 11, showed a view of the project from the top of the hill by Summit. The garages portrayed shown no architectural features. Mr. Hall said that was a very early rendering. They have been at this for a long time and have gone through three different leaders in the Planning Department. At the direction of Bob Rodgers, he did not want to see that detail so that is what was submitted originally. Subsequent leaders requested additional renderings and they were submitted. Councilmember Scharnow said that he cannot say that he is a huge fan of the 55+ component, and there may be some additional parking in order. Mr. Hall said that if they need to find more parking they can. The parking ratio is taken directly from the market. They could probably find another 6-12 spaces if they were needed. Vice Mayor Leckrone said that in the staff report it was mentioned that some of these details would be worked out with staff. It was noted that this would normally be agreed to by staff, but she asked if it was possible to have those plans come back to the Council for approval. Discussion was held on the ability to amend the ordinance and adopt with a change that the development plan come back to Council for approval. Mayor Dickey asked if they could go through the development agreement if there are things they still feel uncomfortable about. Perhaps they could postpone approval of the development agreement and have a further executive session on that topic. Councilmember Scharnow said that he would be in favor of having the development plan come back to Council in light of the opposition and his interest in making the developers do what they say they are going to do. He would also like to have them consider a traffic signal Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 19 of 23 and consider the parking. Councilmember Brown said that they have had two traffic studies done and neither one is asking for a signal. The Town's engineer is saying that they do not need it. He said that they would want to look at that carefully. They could put that $750,000 into another part of the development. Vice Mayor Leckrone said that the statement made about good governance did impact her thinking on the development plan and she would like to see it come back to Council again for approval. Discussion was held on how much time would be needed for the developer to address the checklist and bring back a final plan. It was agreed that it would be done within a year, prior to December 2020 so that the current Council would be voting on it. Councilmember Brown said that this is the first step in the process. They heard from the sales representative that in seven years they have not had any interest in lodging. It is wishful thinking that they are going to get a resort proposal. He supports Copperwynd and Fort McDowell and the downtown could benefit from those projects. He is in favor of this project. Councilmember Tolis said that there are pros and cons to this development, but it provides a feeder. In his neighborhood there were older residents that sold their homes and they had families move in. Mayor Dickey said that she is not ready to give up on the idea of something happening on this property. The General Plan designated this project as lodging and the citizens voted on it. Residents have purchased their homes with the understanding that there may be a resort located there. She said that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to deny the request and made that loud and clear. She said that approval of this project as they are seeing it would allow grading now with no vertical for up to ten years. Councilmember Brown said that there is a difference between those wanting to do a resort and this application. These guys have the money and are ready to do the work. If they do not move forward they could wait for another 30 years. He said that every time they change anything there are vigilante groups that are well oiled and well informed that fight it. He was voted in to watch out for all of the town and not the two percent. He said that it is his fiduciary responsibility to look out for the Town. Councilmember Magazine said that this was only the second time he has read a statement. He has always been a pretty decisive person. He cannot remember a time when he has been so indecisive. He did not make up his mind until today. He read the staff report and the position of the Planning and Zoning Commission. On one hand, approval could provide inexpensive housing for teachers and workers and provide much needed revenue. On the other hand they have a General Plan approved by the citizens, although it is nearly ten years old. He said that he has been vocal in opposition to having to perform a legislative mandated plan at a cost of$150,000. The staff report asked us to consider if the change from lodging was appropriate and beneficial to the Town, and if so if a change to multifamily residential provided an equal or better opportunity. Councilmember Magazine thanked the citizens that sent them well written pro and con statements. A few of them, for some reason, have been accusatory or demeaning. Nowhere in the Code of Ethics does it say that they have to accept abuse, Some Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 20 of 23 commented on renters. Despite their occasional differences, he has only the best of Town in his mind when considering an issue. Councilmember Spelich said that it is stated that this proposed amendment is a minor amendment; he believes it is a major one. He also believes that disregarding the people they interviewed and nominated to the Planning and Zoning Commission is an insult to them. He said that in 2008 when he decided to retire from the Police Department in Chicago what brought him to Fountain Hills was that location at Palisades and Shea. He knew this was the place he wanted to retire to. They bought a house in 2009 and moved here in 2014. He believes that this is not a good location for this development and they are definitely not sticking to "keeping the environment" by blowing up a hill. Vice Mayor Leckrone said for her the issue is whether the Town can benefit, and she believes that it can. They want to encourage developers to come here. She has been on the Council for a year and so much has been about revenue. They have heard facts on both sides and opinions. They have also heard some real estate agents say there is a need for more rental. They all want more businesses; they need a place for customers and workers. She said that she does like the Mayor's concern for the homeowners, but when someone buys next to vacant land it may be developed. She was on the Planning and Zoning Commission when they approved the resort. She would have loved to have seen a resort, but they are there today and do not have anyone. They could wait, but there is no revenue for waiting. Vice Mayor Leckrone said that does respect the Planning and Zoning Commission; she was on the Commission. She said that as she read the minutes she did not understand their reasoning for their votes. Coming to the meeting tonight she was looking for information. She does respect their position, but sometimes they may not always agree. She said that they as councilmembers have to trust staff and respect what they tell them. They rely on them and on the information they bring, not speculations, hopes or rumors. Councilmember Tolis said that he did not come with a prepared statement; he wanted to be very open and hear all of the presentation. They have three options; one is to move forward and trust developers to be honest and forthright. He could not think of any other developer than Jeremy Hall and his team to do that. They have brought amazing properties to Fountain Hills. The Planning and Zoning Commission has voted down many other projects. If they were always going to be in step with the commissions, they would not have the Fountain Hills they have today. He said that a lot of information tonight has been tweaked, revised, updated, as the developer is going through the process and it can be seen that they are doing everything possible to comply with the Town to create this project in a way that will work with the community and outreach to the neighborhoods. He said that if they do not move forward, they can hope for a potential resort. He would love to see that property with a beautiful resort, but times are changing and development is happening. They will still have that same beautiful view the feeling on arriving in Fountain Hills. The traffic arguments were not compelling. He said that the three arterials will continue to have more and more traffic; maybe people will use other routes. He said that this is going to have beautiful amenities with walking paths and open space. Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 21 of 23 Councilmember Brown told Councilmember Spelich that during the eight years he was on the Planning and Zoning Commission, at least once a year the recommendations sent by the Commission to the Town Council would be overturned. The Commission is looking at an issue strictly from the planning and zoning aspect—not taking into consideration the overall picture of the town. ii. CONSIDERATION OF Resolution 2019-39, a proposed Minor Amendment to the Town of Fountain Hills General Plan 2010 to change the land use designation on approximately 23 acres of land located on the east side of Palisades Boulevard north of Shea Boulevard from Lodging to Mulit-Family/Medium. If adopted, the amendment will allow for multi-residential development. (Case# GPA2019 - 01) MOVED BY Councilmember Dennis Brown, SECONDED BY Councilmember Art Tolis to adopt Resolution 2019-39. Vote: 5 - 2 Passed NAY: Mayor Ginny Dickey Councilmember David Spelich iii. CONSIDERATION OF Ordinance 19-03, a proposed amendment to the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Map. If adopted, the amendment would rezone approximately 59.79 acres at 10825 N Palisades, from the "L-3 P.U.D." and "OSR" zoning districts to the "Daybreak PAD" zoning district. If approved, the rezoning will allow the construction of an apartment complex with up to 400 dwelling units. (Case #Z2018-10) Mr. Arnson said that he heard there would be a modification needed to be made to the ordinance before adoption to reflect the change discussed earlier, adding a condition that the complete development plan come back before Council before December 1, 2020. Mr. Wesley asked for clarification on whether the development plan would have to go back through Planning and Zoning Commission as well. Councilmember Brown said that it would come directly to the Council. MOVED BY Councilmember Dennis Brown, SECONDED BY Councilmember Art Tolis to adopt Ordinance 19-03 with the modified stipulations (a-Ensure compliance with the Daybreak Development Plan approved with this P.A.D. except as modified below; b-Ensure compliance with the Town's adopted codes, requirements, standards and regulations, except as specifically stated in the Daybreak PAD Development Plan, to be approved by Town Council, c-Before December 1, 2020, amend and submit for review and approval by the Town Council, a development plan that complies with the following: i-Cause all buildings to be set back at least 25' from the property line or the height of the building, whichever is greater. Buildings A and B do not currently meet this requirement; ii-Provide greater connectivity from the trail around the MFU area into apartment area; iii-Provide a pedestrian connection from Building Q to the amenity area; iv-Improve pedestrian connectivity from the northern apartment buildings [A, B, C, D, E, & G,] to the amenity area; v-Upgrade the design and amenities to meet the General Plan requirement for exceptional design and enhanced amenities; vi-Provide extensive landscaping along Palisades Boulevard that exceeds the minimum requirements set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance; vii-Remove all reference to assisted living from the PAD narrative; and viii-Provide a traffic control solution, either a roundabout or traffic signal, at the intersection of Palisades Boulevard and Valley Vista Drive as approved by the Town Engineer. Vote: 5 - 2 Passed Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 22 of 23 NAY: Mayor Ginny Dickey Councilmember David Spelich iv. CONSIDERATION OF Resolution 2019-52 approving a Development Agreement associated with the Daybreak P.A.D. rezoning located at the northeast corner of Palisades and Shea Boulevards. Brief discussion was held on the ability to postpone action on the development agreement as it references the PAD that is not complete. Mayor Dickey said that if they do not postpone action, then they need to discuss it in public. Councilmember Scharnow said that he did not understand the need to move forward with the development agreement tonight. Mr. Gilbert said that they need the development agreement as soon as possible so they can go forward with their financing. Also, there is a provision in the development agreement that talks about a roundabout. He said that there has been opposition to the roundabout and they would like to amend the agreement to remove that stipulation. Mr. Wesley noted that the roundabout was part of the ordinance that was just adopted. MOVED BY Councilmember Alan Magazine, SECONDED BY Councilmember Dennis Brown to reconsider item 8-A-iii. Vote: 7 - 0 Passed - Unanimously MOVED BY Councilmember Dennis Brown, SECONDED BY Councilmember Art Tolis to adopt Ordinance 19-03 with the stipulations previously stated, removing modification viii (roundabout). Vote: 5 - 2 Passed NAY: Mayor Ginny Dickey Councilmember David Spelich Mayor Dickey said that she still had a lot of questions about the development agreement and she would like an opportunity to discuss it further in executive session and bring it back for consideration. Council concurred that they would postpone action on the development agreement, but would bring it back as soon as possible. 9. COUNCIL DISCUSSION/DIRECTION to the TOWN MANAGER Item(s)listed below are related only to the propriety of(i)placing such item(s)on a future agenda for action, or (ii)directing staff to conduct further research and report back to the Council. 10. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY Councilmember Alan Magazine, SECONDED BY Councilmember Dennis Brown to adjourn. Vote: 7 - 0 Passed - Unanimously The Regular Meeting of the Fountain Hills Town Council of October 1, 2019, adjourned at 12:25 a.m. (October 2, 2019). Town Council Regular Meeting of October 1, 2019 23 of 23 TOWN OF FOUNTAIN HILLS Ginny Dicidey, May r ATTEST AND PREPARED BY: Eliz beth A. B Town Clerk CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Regular Meeting held by the Town Council of Fountain Hills in the Town Hall Council Chambers on the 1st day of October, 2019. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and that a quorum was present. DATED this 15th day of October, 2019. (-_,)-A.,1_4,7_ lizabet urke, Town Cler www.fh.az.gov Town of Fountain HillsStaff Presentation GPA2019-01 & Z2018-10 Minor General Plan Amendment & Daybreak PAD 10825 N Palisades Boulevard www.fh.az.gov Requests •Minor General Plan Amendment on 23 acres: Lodging to Multi-Family/Medium •Rezone ~60 acres from L-3 PUD and OSR to Daybreak PAD www.fh.az.gov Location Minor General Plan (M.G.P.A.) Amendment Boundary Planned Area Development (P.A.D.) Boundary www.fh.az.gov General Plan Amendment Minor General Plan Amendment Boundary REQUEST: Minor General Plan Amendment. This request will change the designation from Lodging to Multi- Family/Medium to allow for the development of a multi- resident community with a density between 4 and 10 dwelling units per acre www.fh.az.gov Criteria for Review •“Amendments to the General Plan 2010 should occur only after careful review of the requests, and of findings of fact in support of the revision at public hearing(s) before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council.” www.fh.az.gov Background •Designated for Lodging since 1990’s •Rezoned from R1-43 to Lodging in 1999; latest amendment in 2011 •No development has occurred www.fh.az.gov General Plan Language •Lodging: Lodging category includes areas where tourist-oriented lower density hotels or motels (which can also include resort uses) together with supportive retail and restaurant uses, should be developed. Higher density and multi-story hotels, motels and resorts should be located only in areas designated for Lodging, Mixed Use or General Commercial/Retail www.fh.az.gov General Plan Language •Multi-Family/Medium (4 –10 du/ac): •With Council approval can be over 10 du/ac in concentrated areas to direct development away from environmentally sensitive areas. •Particularly encouraged as transitional between existing developed residential and commercial areas. •Should be developed with exceptional design, enhanced site amenities, extensive landscaped setbacks from collector roadway corridors and controlled access to the arterial roadway corridor. www.fh.az.gov General Plan Language Chapter 3: Land Use Element •Vision: A Town that seeks to preserve its character and beauty using land use principles that allow development in a cohesive and beneficial manner to protect neighborhoods and support business development. www.fh.az.gov General Plan Language •Goal 5 of the Land Use Element states: •Goal Five: Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent land uses. •Objective 5.6 The Town should support proposed lodging sites planned with expansive open-space buffers from adjacent residential uses. www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Is a change from the Lodging designation appropriate and beneficial to the Town at this time? •Does a change to a multi-residence land use category provide a better land use pattern for the Town? •Is the proposed development the best use for the property and meet the objectives of the Town? www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Is a change from Lodging appropriate? •Tourism is a big industry in Arizona •CopperWynd is expanding •No other good lodging sites •Hasn’t been developed •Local amenities not available •Site not ideal •Industry undergoing changes www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Does a change to multi-residence designation provide a better land use pattern? •Wide range of housing options needed www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Does a change to multi-residence designation provide a better land use pattern? •Increased density to support commercial •Density needs to be in appropriate locations www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Does a change to multi-residence designation provide a better land use pattern? •Close proximity to arterial network •Not between residential and commercial www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Does a change to multi-residence designation provide a better land use pattern? •Other choices such as lower density residential and office equally valid www.fh.az.gov Review Questions •Is the proposed development appropriate and meet objectives of the Town? •Don’t want to change land use if not ready to rezone •More fully discussed in the rezoning case •General Plan Concerns with •Amount of cut/fill –modification of natural terrain •Target demographics •Exceptional design, enhanced site amenities www.fh.az.gov Summary •Lodging may no longer be the appropriate designation •Multi-Family/Medium is one of several options that could work but may not be the best option •There are concerns with the current proposal, a change in the Plan should not be approved without a development plan that will be approved. www.fh.az.gov Questions www.fh.az.gov Rezoning Planned Area Development (P.A.D.)Boundary www.fh.az.gov Rezoning •Current Zoning is L-3 P.U.D. (Lodging with a Planned Unit Development Overlay) •Approved for development of a resort hotel with conference facilities. •Request: rezone to Daybreak Planned Area Development •Will allow multi-family development of up to 400 units; 6.7 units/acre •MFU, MFR, and OSR areas www.fh.az.gov Review and Submission requirements •Request for PAD requires approval of a Development Plan which shall consist of: •The town-approved version of the Site Plan submitted according to Subsection 23.07(B); •The master water, sewer, and drainage plans and the traffic analysis as required by Subsection 23.07(C); •The project narrative provided according to Subsection 2.04(C); and, •The phasing plan submitted according to Subsection 2.04(C) www.fh.az.gov Overview •Lot 1A –Multi-Family Unrestricted (MFU) •270 units •1, 2, and 3 bedroom units •Amenity area •Garages with apartments above •Lot 1B –Multi-Family Restricted (MFR) •130 units •Restricted to those 55+ •“Townhome” and apartment buildings •Amenity area •Tract A –Open Space Recreation www.fh.az.gov Site Plan www.fh.az.gov Elevations www.fh.az.gov Elevations www.fh.az.gov Site Plan Concerns •Creating a more pedestrian oriented environment consistent with the requirements of Sec. 19.03 B. •Leveling large areas, not using natural contours as required by Sec. 19.03 D. •Concealing of utility equip as required by Sec. 19.04 F. •Encouraging pedestrian use as described in Sec. 19.05 B. •Provide information on walls, signage and lighting as required by Sections 19.05 E, G, & H. •Provide the detail on colors and materials to demonstrate compliance with Sec. 19.06. www.fh.az.gov Traffic Analysis •Proposed driveways align with existing median breaks •Town Engineer supports these locations •Palisades designed for this level of traffic •Applicant has recently stated their intention to modify their design to include a traffic circle at Palisades and Valley Vista Drive to address resident concerns www.fh.az.gov Roundabout •Preliminary design •Town Engineer sees no significant issues •Appears to result in some additional fill on the east side of Palisades www.fh.az.gov Development Standards Parking -MFU •82 under Town code for Unrestricted Dwelling Type Fountain Hills Request for MFU Studio 1.50 1.30 1 Bedroom 1.50 1.50 2 Bedroom 2.00 1.70 3 Bedroom 2.00 2.00 Guest 0.25 0.10 www.fh.az.gov Development Standards Parking -MFR •130 units; 130 spaces •Concern for number and location of spaces available for the 55+ apartment building Dwelling Type Fountain Hills Request for MFR Studio (specialized care)1.50 0.70 1 Bedroom 1.50 1.0 2 Bedroom 2.00 1.0 www.fh.az.gov Development Standards Cut and Fill •Code maximum –10’ •Requesting 30’ max. cut; 57’ max. fill •Allows for site access, on-site accessibility, lowers buildings •Been approved other developments •Significant change to existing topography, not desired by General Plan or Zoning Ordinance Design Guidelines www.fh.az.gov Development Standards Cut and fill www.fh.az.gov Previous Cut and Fill www.fh.az.gov Development Standards Cut and fill www.fh.az.gov Development Standards Slopes •Requested minor adjustments to maximum slopes •Town Engineer no concerns Landscape •Modifications from subdivision requirements –more lush landscape along Palisades and amenity area www.fh.az.gov Applicant Modifications As a result of continuance and discussions with neighbors, the applicant has proposed the following modifications to the application: •Address traffic concerns through installation of a roundabout •Eliminate all reference to assisted living •Agreed to staff stipulations for approval www.fh.az.gov Staff Analysis •General Plan •Many statements that support and oppose •Key items from staff perspective: •Mission Statement; Land Use Objective 5.2, Goal 6, & Objective 6.1; Growth Areas Objective 3.1 speak to maintaining natural terrain and working with topography •Land Use Objective 5.6 –retain areas designated for Lodging •Guidelines for Multi-Family -developed with exceptional design, enhanced site amenities •Mission Statement and Growth Areas Goal 3 – variety of housing www.fh.az.gov Staff Analysis •Rezoning •Generally support the PAD standards •Concern with parking for 55+ apartment •Concern with designating area for 55+ •Concern with the degree of cut and fill •Site Plan does not provide details required by code –will need follow up approval •Concern with minimal amenity area(s) •Concern with location of amenity area •Concern with level of design •Concern with not following topography, random nature of the buildings www.fh.az.gov Staff Analysis •Rezoning •If approved, need stips for follow-up site plan review by staff to include: •Building meeting setbacks •Better integration of the trail around the development •Better pedestrian connectivity within the development •Better connectivity to the amenity area •Upgraded design and amenities •Extensive landscaping on Palisades •Update the PAD document to remove references to assisted living and provide for the roundabout www.fh.az.gov Summary •In order to approve, Commission will need to find: •Proposal, on balance, is consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan; staff has some concerns •Requested PAD standards are appropriate; staff has concerns with the 55+ designation, level of parking; amount of cut and fill •Site Plan is appropriate for the area and meets Plan and Ordinance requirements; staff has outlined minimum modifications needed www.fh.az.gov Questions Development PlanTwo Distinct NeighborhoodsNEIGHBORHOOD 1Garden Apartments 270 unitsNEIGHBORHOOD 2Age Restricted to 55+ 130 unitsTotal Residential Units 400 unitsDensity (Units/Gross Acre) 6.7** Gross acreage is the typical/acceptedway the Town calculates residentialdensity.Open Space 77%(We are allowed to disturb 40.5 acres, weare only disturbing 26 acres.)400+ have signed petition in 2‐weeksdespite having only half the time asthe opposition. Resort Style LivingGarden Apartments‐Clubhouse & fitness‐Infinity edge pool‐Cabanas‐Spa‐Event lawn‐Fire pits‐Media center‐Walking trail‐Garage & shaded parkingSenior Living‐Dining room‐Lounge / Library‐Lap pool‐Cabanas‐Spa‐Sport courts‐Fire pits‐Community garden‐Rooftop patio‐Transportation Architecture•Varied building massing.•Varying rooflines and styles.•Diverse architectural features.•Balconies/patios.•Diverse use of materials and façade detailing.•Shading such as: enhanced roof overhangs,covered patios/balconies/entrances, and trellis’sto shade windows.•Contemporary color scheme that blends with theSonoran Desert color palette with someappropriate complementary accent colors. DaybreakRidgeViewApartments DaybreakFour PeaksApartments(now condos) Daybreak Building DesignPark Place Building Design Project Rendering (entire property with open space) Project Rendering(close up)Blends nicely with environment & surrounding homes General Plan Town of Fountain Hills –“Purpose of the General Plan 2010”Chapter One – Introduction (Page 1)…“…The General Plan 2002 reflected the combined input from both the public andprivate sectors and provided the Town with goals and development policies for futuregrowthwhile maintaining flexibility in interpretation and use.“The General Plan is a valuable document that provides guidance in the developmentof the Town.For the General Plan to continue to be a meaningful and relevant tool, itmust be kept current. The General Plan Update 2010 is an updated version of theGeneral Plan 2002.”Note:State Law requires General Plan’s to be reviewed and updated every10‐years.FYI.The Town of Fountain Hills is currently started/working on the 2020update. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIONMission Statement (Page 1)“Residents revere the sense of closeness and small town feeling in acommunity dedicated to high quality schools andstrive for diversity inneighborhoodsthat all have an adjacency to nature in common.”“Fountain Hills is committed to creating a Town that is attractive for smallbusinesses, clean industry and village commerce, where thenaturalenvironment is preserved and protected,andwhere diverse housing issupplied in beautiful developments.”Housing Trends (Page 12)“The Town of Fountain Hills has been developed primarily for residential use(53 percent). The peak of residential development occurred between 1996and 1999 and has recently leveled off as the Town approaches full buildout.In recent years, residential development has shifted from single family unitsto more multi‐family complexes.” CHAPTER 3: LAND USE ELEMENTGoal Five:Protect and preserve existing neighborhoods from incompatible adjacent landuses. (Page 34)We meet this Goal.Daybreak provides significant open space; enhanced/compatiblearchitecture; appropriate/consistent height; and less massing.In fact the Rezoning Staff Report States:“Theproposed development includes a fairly significant open space buffer around thebordersas does the contiguous development to the north.These large buffers allow forthe transition in use from less dense to more dense residential uses.Asageneralstatement,the proposed use is compatible with the adjacent neighborhood residentialneighborhood.”Objective 3.9 TheTown should promote infill and mixed‐use projects especially wherepublic/private services, roadways and utilities exist and demonstrate availableexisting/future capacity. (Page 85)Clearly we meet this Objective.As the Staff Report clearly states: “From the General Plan perspective,there is a need in thecommunity to provide for a wider range of demographics, particularly for families and youngprofessionals.” Hotel Not Feasible “Lodging” has been planned since the early 1990’s (As shown on General Plan).Not a prime location (golf, shopping, seclusion, and recreation).The recession was 9+ years ago, no offer to date.No offer for a hotel in 7‐years, since the current owner has owned the property.The current owner had to foreclose against the property.Neil Ginsberg most recognized hotel builder (CopperWynd Resort) and he tooagrees no feasibility for a hotel at this location.The General Plan staff report even states: “This could suggest that this locationisnot desirable for this use and it is time for the Town to consider an alternate landuse designation.”Clearly everyone has tried to get a hotel, no success. Greg Vogel, CEO, Land Advisors(Letter dated July 23, 2019)“Wehavebeenactiveintransactingandadvisingonlandinthevalleysince1987.”“Wehavehadthepropertylistedonand off for the better part of 7 years.”“We met with hoteliers and those whofinance them. We had one group dofurther research as to the viability ofeven a limited service hotel and thesurvey said it was not feasible.”“There is zero feasibility for a resortstyle project at this site.” William Hinz, CopperWynd Resort (Letter dated September 12, 2019)“I do not believe that the site inquestion will be developed as alodging property in the foreseeablefuture. The development costs andthe overall hotel metrics do not makeit viable for resort use with out accessto a golf course, retail, etc.” Staff Reports General Plan Staff Report States:“This property has been designed as Lodging in the General Plan since theearly 1990’s.In 1999, the zoning on the property waschanged from R1‐43 toPUD to allow the development of a resort hotel. While amendments to theplan of development have occurred, the lodging use has remained essentiallythe same. Some versions of the lodging proposalhave included components ofmulti‐residence zoning and housing....”General Plan Staff Report States:“Thissite has been marketed for resort uses for many yearsandno one hasshown any significant interestor been able to put a deal together.Challengesto using this location include thelack of onsite amenities such as a golf course,lack of nearby shopping, too close to major streets, i.e. not secluded enough.” General Plan Staff Report States:“If the land use designation were to be changed on this property,a multi‐family designation is an appropriate alternative.” Rezoning Staff Report States:“Themaster water, sewer and drainage planshavebeen submitted andreviewed by the Town Engineer.”Note:Not mentioned, but the Traffic Report has also been reviewedand approved by the Town.Rezoning Staff Report States:Cut and Fill:…“…The applicant believesthese are the safest locations on the property for thedrivewaysand theTown Engineer agrees they are good places for thedriveways.” Rezoning Staff Report States:“Theproposed development includes a fairly significant open space bufferaround the bordersas does the contiguous development to the north.Theselarge buffers allow for the transition in use from less dense to more denseresidential uses.Asageneralstatement,the proposed use is compatible withthe adjacent neighborhoodresidential neighborhood.”Rezoning Staff Report States:“The applicant points out theymaintaining approximately 80% of the site asopen space.” Rezoning Staff Report States:Rezoning“Staffis supportive of most of the requested P.A.D. standards.” Proposed Daybreakvs.APPROVED Conference Hotel Proposed Daybreak Site Plan Approved Hotel Site PlanHotel building is a single massive structureSmaller buildingswith separation Daybreak (3 stories)Conference Hotel (5 stories) Daybreak from South Entry on PalisadesConference Hotel from Palisades South Daybreak from Palisades NorthConference Hotel from Palisades North Daybreak from Westridge VillageNo hotel rendering from Westridge Village Improved Development StandardsHotelAs ApprovedDaybreakProposedBetter/WorseTallest Building 5 stories3 storiesBetterLongest Contiguous Building 1,400 feet 600 feetBetterMax. Bldg. Height Over Finished Grade 40 feet40 feet‐‐Maximum Hillside Cut 30 feet30 feet‐‐OSR Area 37 acres37 acres‐‐ Improvement Over Hotel to Neighbors•Smaller total overall building massing•More space between structures/smaller building footprints•Better architecture•Blends with the desert environment better•Lower overall building height•Greater view preservation•No conference or wedding “come‐at‐once” event traffic•No noise and disruption from hotel events Stipulations We agree to all of the Staff’s stipulations.1.Ensure compliance with the Daybreak Development Plan approved with this P.A.D, except asmodified below.2.Ensure compliance with all of the Town's adopted codes, requirements, standards and regulations,except as specifically stated in the Daybreak PAD Development Plan, except as modified below.3.Amend the Development Plan and submit for review and acceptance by the Development ServicesDirector prior to submission of a building permit, a revised site plan meeting the requirements ofSection 2.04 of the Zoning Ordinance which include the following:a.Cause all buildings to be set back at least 25' from the property line or the height of thebuilding, whichever is greater. Buildings A and B do not currently meet this requirement.b.Provide greater connectivity from the trail around the MFU area into apartment area.c.Provide a pedestrian connection from Building Q to the amenity area.d.Improve pedestrian connectivity from the northern apartment buildings (A, B, C, D, E, & G) tothe amenity area.e.Upgrade the design and amenities to meet the General Plan requirement for exceptionaldesign and enhanced amenities.f.Provide extensive landscaping along Palisades Boulevard that exceeds the minimumrequirements set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance. Additional Compromises.1. Eliminate the assisted living.2. Provide a roundabout or traffic signal.3. Provide for shuttle service for the senior living. Greg Vogel Land Advisors Organization © 2019 All Rights Reserved While Land Advisors Organization makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnish data.The Best Known Name in Land Founded 1987•Land Advisors Organization operates in 24 markets nationwide.•Specializing in land brokerage and land‐related services.•Large scale MPCs to finished Lots, site selection services and institutional representation.Scottsdale, AZ | Casa Grande, AZ | Prescott, AZ | Tucson, AZ | Irvine, CA | Bay Area, CA | Coachella Valley, CA | Pasadena, CA Roseville, CA | San Diego, CA | Santa Barbara, CA | Valencia, CA | Orlando, FL | Tampa, FL | Boise, ID | Charlotte, NCAlbuquerque, NM | Las Vegas, NV |Reno, NV |Austin, TX | Dallas‐Fort Worth, TX | Houston, TX | Salt Lake City, UT | Seattle, WA Land Advisors Organization © 2019 All Rights Reserved While Land Advisors Organization makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnish data.Phoenix 2nd Qtr 2019Mar ’01 ‐Nov ‘01Dec ’07 ‐Jun ‘09Jul ’90 ‐Mar ‘91Annual Population ChangeYearly Increase in PopulationSource: US Census Bureau, Arizona Dept. of Administration & Arizona Dept. of Health ServicesIn‐MigrationNatural GrowthProjectedRecessionAveragePopulation Growth1990’s: 1,013,0002000’s: 975,0002010’s: 814,000Natural Growth2007 Peak: 44,8002018: 21,000Change: ‐23,800Declining births &increasing deaths44.8K21.0K Land Advisors Organization © 2019 All Rights Reserved While Land Advisors Organization makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnish data.Phoenix 2nd Qtr 2019Total PermitsSingle & MultifamilySource: US Census Bureau, Greater Phoenix Blue Chip Forecast, Land AdvisorsTotal SF & MF Permits Average (33.2K)1990’sSF 285KMF 69KTotal 353K1990’sSF 285KMF 69KTotal 353K2000’sSF 341KMF 61KTotal 401K2000’sSF 341KMF 61KTotal 401K2010’s*SF 150KMF 64KTotal 215K2010’s*SF 150KMF 64KTotal 215KRecessionJul ’90 – Mar ‘91RecessionMar ‘01 – Nov ‘01RecessionDec ‘07 – Jun ‘09* Estimated Land Advisors Organization © 2019 All Rights Reserved While Land Advisors Organization makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnish data.Phoenix 2nd Qtr 2019Annualized Employment ChangeJobs Added or Lost AnnuallySource: Arizona Dept. of Employment and Population Statistics, Land AdvisorsAverage monthly change in non‐farm employment.Unemployment RateJune 2019National:3.7%Arizona:4.6%Phoenix:4.6%Arizona added 78,600 new job YoYPhoenix added 68,400 new jobs YoY Non‐Farm Employment July 2018 to June 2019 Land Advisors Organization © 2019 All Rights Reserved While Land Advisors Organization makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnish data.Phoenix 2nd Qtr 2019 Land Advisors Organization © 2019 All Rights Reserved While Land Advisors Organization makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, express or implied as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnish data.Phoenix 2nd Qtr 2019New ResortsSince 2010 –2 new resorts have been built in or around Scottsdale•Mountain Shadows (56thSt and Lincoln Dr – Paradise Valley)•Talking Stick Resort (Loop 101 and Indian Bend Rd ‐Scottsdale)Today 2 new resorts are under development•Ritz Carlton (Scottsdale Rd and Indian Bend Rd – Paradise Valley)•The Great Wolf Lodge (Pima Rd and Hummingbird Ln ‐Scottsdale) Jeremy Hall Main Objectionsto Daybreak “Daybreak will hurt my property value” Multifamily development DOES NOT hurt surrounding property values“In general, neither multifamily rental housing, nor low‐incomehousing, causes neighboring property values to decline.”Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies“We find that large, dense multifamily rental developments… do notnegatively impact the sales price of nearby single‐family homes.”MIT Center for Real Estate“High multifamily areas had the highest home values, the mixed‐stockareas the next highest, and the single‐family areas the lowest.”Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies “Daybreak is way too dense” Daybreak DensityMuch less than other Fountain Hills rental communitiesPark Place 46.8 units/acreFour Peaks Condos 17.6 units/acreRidgeview (aka Arrive) 15.0 units/acreKeystone 9.1 units/acreDaybreak 6.7 units/acre “Traffic from Daybreak will be unsafe” Daybreak WILL NOT create unsafe traffic conditions•Traffic study by CIVTECH Engineersapproved by the town1. Average 1.7 trips per minute from the project2. Only 16% additional traffic to Palisades3. Entrances meet or exceed minimum code visibility triangles4. Traffic signal not required•Daybreak meets all ASHTO traffic standards•Similar count as hotel, but without special event spikesDespite no requirement to do so, developer is offering to construct a roundabout or traffic light at the main entrance “The senior living is under parked” Senior Living ParkingNo Standard in the Fountain Hills ZoningTransportation is provided, so residents have few, if any, carsCity of Phoenix Zoning 1.00 /unitFountainview Village 0.98 /unitMorningstar 0.89 /unitNational ITE* Standard 0.59 /unitDaybreak 1.00 /unit* Institute of Traffic Engineers “There is too much hillside cut” Daybreak Hillside Cut•Previous zoning has already approved a 30 foot cut•Similar cuts have been approved in other recent projectsAdero Canyon Phase 138 feetAdero Canyon Phase 229 feetFireRock Parcel B27 feetLowering the crest of the hill preserves views for neighbors Summit at Crestview Lowered hill to maintain viewsSummit at Crestview Summit at Crestview Similar cut/fill of this hillSimilar grading of this hilltop “There is too much hillside fill and they’re filling the washes” Daybreak Hillside Fill•Previous zoning has already approved a 30 foot fill for the 23 acres•The additional fill is limited to small area at southern entry drive1. Necessary for safest access to property2. Necessary for storm water retention to protect environment3. Requested by the town to eliminate Palisades steep drop off4. Approved by the town engineerDaybreak is NOT filling major washes Main Washes Untouched Only area of deeper fill Only area of deeper fillPalisades steep drop will be eliminated Deeper Fill Area Post Construction “We don’t need more apartments” Shifts in Household FormationOwn vs. Rent2006 2016 ChangeHouseholds Who OWNTotal U.S. 68% 63%‐7%Greater Phoenix 69% 59%‐14%Households Who RENTTotal U.S. 32% 37%+16%Greater Phoenix 31% 41%+32%•More households are renting than at any point in 50 years•16 of the 50 largest U.S. cities now have more renters than ownersSource: Pew Research Center, U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development, and rentcafe.com Households Who RENTAge Distribution (Nationally)ShareChange2009 to 2015under 35 years 17.2 mil.+0.5 mil.Largest Share35 to 55 years 15.9 mil. + 2.0 mil.over 55 years11.4 mil.+ 2.5 mil.Largest IncreasePhoenix ranks 3rdnationally in 55+ age group renter households –up 59%Source: rentcafe.com Fountain Hills Household ShiftsOwned Rented% Rented2011 8,460 1,59315.8%2012 8,502 1,67116.4%2013 8,562 1,80517.4%2014 8,841 1,90117.7%2015 9,055 2,02018.2%2016 9,276 2,25319.5%2017 9,296 2,47421.0%Change ‘11‐’17 836 88151.3%% Change up 9.9% up 55.3%Source: U.S. Census Bureau This shift isHappeningInFountain Hills! “No Development”is not an Option Post from “Stop Daybreak” PetitionLeader of the oppositionNo developmentWhere’s the hotel? 1. Ignoring household shifts may cause growth to stagnate/decline2. Improve housing options to attract younger residents 3. Provide amenitized housing option to serve our mature residents4. Better than hotel for view preservation, noise, intensity and dark skies5. Boost local commerce6. Boost local tax revenueWhy should the town support Daybreak? Daybreak’sEconomic Impact to Fountain Hills over 10 Years$19.6 million in Local Employment Income$42.7 million in Resident Consumer Spending$ 2.2 million in Local Sales Tax Revenue$ 1.7 million in Local Rental Tax RevenueSources: change.org Recipient: Fountain Hills Town Council Letter: Greetings, Supporters of Daybreak Development Name Location Date Troy Hirvi Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Julie Boyce Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Alex Rivera Houston, US 2019-09-17 Starr Bielas Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Karl Gaardsmoe Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Amy Arnold Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Murray Nelson Fountian hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Sylvain Thauvette Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Pam Aguilu Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-17 ilona Brownell Adams Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Cori Vioal Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 AI Ronca Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Barbara Di Jacklin Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Suzanne Hummel Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Loree LaGrou Mount Clemens, US 2019-09-17 natalie varela Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 MARK CHIPFUR Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-17 Anna Collins -Christie Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Bob GFRLOFS Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Ted Reisig Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Alice Novotny La Habra, CA 2019-09-17 Karla Wagner Chandler, AZ 2019-09-17 Name Location Date Ken Jeschke Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Darryl Yewchin Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-18 John Kavanagh Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Mark Ruebusch Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Dilip Trivedi Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Janet Amaral Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Emily Hemmerle Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Luanna Goltry Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Jerry Caldwell Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Beth Culp Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Irene Luna Highland, US 2019-09-18 Dana Saar Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Jeremy Forney Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Ebony Rhett New York, US 2019-09-18 Pamela Flynn Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 cecil yates Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Stacie Storey US 2019-09-18 Devran Lowe Mount Vernon, US 2019-09-18 Ric Newman Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Barbara Russo Piscataway, NJ 2019-09-18 Gina Rucker Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Jean Linzer Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Name Location Date Christopher Garrett Lynchburg, US 2019-09-18 cindy spears Sterlington, US 2019-09-18 Emily Saavedra Notre Dame, US 2019-09-18 Laura Ellis Pittsburgh, US 2019-09-18 Pierre Porter Los Angeles, US 2019-09-18 Keisha Scott Jamaica, US 2019-09-18 Rosemary Powell Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Fred James Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Kara Gardner Waukesha, US 2019-09-18 Fand AM Hoffman Estates, US 2019-09-18 Eileen Sienkiewicz US 2019-09-18 Donna Mazar Snohomish, US 2019-09-18 Denah Natafgy Houston, US 2019-09-18 Bart Shea Fort Mcdowell, AZ 2019-09-18 Bob Scarpetti Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Vicki Thomas Paradise Valley, AZ 2019-09-18 Terry Larkin Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Denise Weinreich Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Robert Lees Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 AI Mirakovits Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Geri Reski Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Patty Hagerty Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Name Location Date Will Cummings Columbia, US 2019-09-18 Bonnie Turner Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Jerold Miles Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Leonard MacQueen Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 David Hale Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Gianni DeRosa Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Linette Oliver Lake Forest, US 2019-09-18 Judy Brown Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-18 Nixzarindani Rodriguez San Jose, CA 2019-09-18 Cathy Dockery Denver, NC 2019-09-18 Hazel Cunningham Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Willie Polk Aurora, US 2019-09-18 Shawn White Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Michele McGuinness Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Rajani Bachina Newark, US 2019-09-18 Russell) Walden Sedalia, US 2019-09-18 Alyssa Bravo Colorado Springs, US 2019-09-18 Taylor Samsel Austin, US 2019-09-18 Cheryl Snell Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Joseph Ramos Houston, US 2019-09-19 Simon Lightbourn Stuart, FL 2019-09-19 Tiffany Bender Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Name Location Date Bekr H Las Vegas, NV 2019-09-19 Kelly Grossie Texas 2019-09-19 Glory Harnois Winter Garden, US 2019-09-19 iris maurer Portland, US 2019-09-19 Katie Lee Delaware, US 2019-09-19 don santo Forest Grove, US 2019-09-19 donald williams menomonee falls, US 2019-09-19 Emily Jones Huffman, US 2019-09-19 Diane Haag Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Marie Santiago Bronx, NY 2019-09-19 Fred Quezada San Diego, US 2019-09-19 Urszula Pawelec Middle Village, US 2019-09-19 Sahasra Enjeeti Holliston, US 2019-09-19 Keana Davis Sarasota, US 2019-09-19 Meredith Collins Mount vernon, US 2019-09-19 Frederick Lawrence Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 William Huertas Fort Wayne, IN 2019-09-19 Susan Titus Madison, WI 2019-09-19 David Dunn Tujunga, US 2019-09-20 Christina Boyle Racine, US 2019-09-20 Cesar Pecina Pearland, US 2019-09-20 Adam Thompson US 2019-09-20 Name Location Date Dzintars Grauds Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Teresa Govan San Antonio, US 2019-09-20 Scott Duff Lenexa, US 2019-09-20 Adrianne Driggers Moncks Corner, US 2019-09-20 Steven B. Vargo, Jr. Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Cynthia Dunham Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Stephen Clyne Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 MJ Wilkins Chandler, AZ 2019-09-20 unice Gaitir Miami, FL 2019-09-20 Sharron Grzybowski Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 heather reed oakland, US 2019-09-20 Shayla Downing Hoffman Estates, US 2019-09-20 june baker Chicago, US 2019-09-20 Darcy Cola Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Chad Bernick Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-20 Jayne Nothnagel Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Scott Grzybowski Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Mychae! Miller Tigard, US 2019-09-20 Rosemary Raysor Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 charles boettger fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Elizabeth Bakey Ridley Park, US 2019-09-21 Starr Bryan Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-21 Name Location Date Terry Oburn Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-21 Lauren Monaghan Pittsburgh, PA 2019-09-21 Christina Bertram Fort Lauderdale, FL 2019-09-21 SHAOLANDA ISBELL Apison, US 2019-09-21 Jessica Telusma 5926 SW 26th St, US 2019-09-21 Andrea Clark Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-21 Marcia Monaghan Philadelphia, PA 2019-09-21 Pamela Schairbaum Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Warren Ostergard Johns Island, US 2019-09-21 Chris Scholl Neptune, NJ 2019-09-21 Klaus Kokott Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-22 Karen Zubert Fountain Hills, US 2019-09-22 Carrie Dye Sedmak Torrance, US 2019-09-22 Lori Thompson Ashland city, US 2019-09-22 nicee chick Whitesburg, US 2019-09-22 Joseph Tomaso Schenectady, US 2019-09-22 tanya baker westfield, US 2019-09-22 Jackie Toughill US 2019-09-22 Barbara Hansen Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-22 Shane Drozdowski Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-22 Oliver Bustamante San Antonio, US 2019-09-22 Sherry Sledge Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-22 Name Location Date Suzanne "Sami" Jack Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-25 Dori Wittrig Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-25 Dawn Woods Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-25 Patrick Nelson Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-25 Thomas Ward Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-25 Matt Mcdonald Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-26 claudia barajas Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Marie Ferverda Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Kathy Florence Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Jim Mathews Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-26 Carrie Richter Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Rich Barker Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Joaquin Ventura Glendale, AZ 2019-09-26 Cody Patrick Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-26 Jonathan Barajas Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-26 Jesus Ibarra Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-26 Maria Tenchipe Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-26 Paul Saunders Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 JENNIFER ROMAN FH, AZ 2019-09-26 Glenn Roberts Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-26 Madiha Ali Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Carrie Mathews Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-26 Name Location Date Juanita Vanhoorelbeke Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-28 Michael Laudermilch Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-28 Elizabeth Reyes Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-28 Dominic Suozzi Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-28 Pam Mynars Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-29 George Leger Temagami, Canada 2019-09-29 Wendy Kelleher Chandler, AZ 2019-09-29 Ria Lascio Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-29 Walter Bawol Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-29 Samuel Diaz Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Paul Von Auch Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Maria Byerly Fountain Hills. Mz, AZ 2019-09-30 Jack Robinson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Geoff Peacock Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Shelly Canales Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Estefany Diaz -Lopez Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Heather Belvin Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Rita Johnson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Kara Wynter Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Arman Pannu San Jose, US 2019-09-30 Donald K Pennell Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Lisa Paulson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Name Location Date Scott McPherson CCIM Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-30 Vasvi Babu Fountain hills, AZ 2019-10-01 Julia Frisby Phoenix, AZ 2019-10-01 Debbie Clason Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-10-01 Eric Aceves Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-10-01 Name Location Date Kevin Conlan Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Samuel Diaz -Lopez Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-27 Alexandra Rutka Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Daniel Fecteau Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Green Lazuli Las Vegas, US 2019-09-27 Darnell Whitaker Chicago, US 2019-09-27 Keith Pavia Paradise Valley, AZ 2019-09-27 Rhonda Nelson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Michael Oberg Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Thomas Maffei Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-27 Mary Ann Michaels Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Doug Gibson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 william bryniarski fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Maxine Dee Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-27 Karen Whitney Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Danielle Simpson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Carole Breton Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-27 Gary Tiffany Rockford, IL 2019-09-28 corinna suozzi Fountain Hills, AZ. 2019-09-28 Diane Wheeler Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-28 Dana Triano Flemington, NJ 2019-09-28 John Brady Sparta, US 2019-09-28 Name Location Date Lynne Lansdon Mapleton, US 2019-09-22 John shook Lake Elsinore, US 2019-09-22 Jasmine love trin St.louis, US 2019-09-22 Frank Bye Sr Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-22 Deborah Skehen Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-22 Mike Nothnagel Mesa, AZ 2019-09-23 Gershom Benavidez San Diego, US 2019-09-23 Elisabeth Worrell Carbondale, CO 2019-09-23 Timothy Connolly Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-23 Cheryl Malcolm Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-23 Ron Malcolm Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-23 Armel Harrigan Santa Rosa Beach, FL 2019-09-23 Gloria Krutza Mount Laurel, NJ 2019-09-23 Kris Rotter Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-24 Charles Tracy Clearlakeoaks, US 2019-09-24 Gerry Lynn Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-24 Rachael Dizmang Pittsburg, US 2019-09-24 ashley moorefield Pittsburgh, US 2019-09-24 Josh Olsick Ephrata, US 2019-09-24 Sam Berry San Diego, US 2019-09-24 Dyan Martinez Bronx, US 2019-09-24 Justin Garrett Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-25 Name Location Date DEBRAJ ELDER Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Murray Clark Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Joshua Merchant Phoenix, US 2019-09-21 Mark Dalton Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Rick Suhl Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Cheryl S Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-21 LuAnn Barr Tucson, US 2019-09-21 Wanda Sweeny Roseau, Dominica 2019-09-21 Denee Foisy Oak Ridge, US 2019-09-21 PwnageTurtle35/SouthParkFanatitlS 2019-09-21 2005 Lelani Reed Shelbyville, US 2019-09-21 Novan Fandrian Saratoga, US 2019-09-21 Jillian Bryan Brooklyn, US 2019-09-21 Kathleen Swetzoff Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Bobbylynn Stewart Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Janice Neff Fountain Hills, AZ, IL 2019-09-21 Ken Ly Santa Clara, US 2019-09-21 Jay Schlum Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Jeri Hensel Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Anna Trumble Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-21 Paul L Brooklyn Park, MN 2019-09-21 Name Location Date Richard Rogers Beverly, US 2019-09-20 Dick Jones Houston, US 2019-09-20 Kaitlyn Siegmann Salisbury, US 2019-09-20 Amelia Whittier Overland Park, US 2019-09-20 Rachel Strickland Houston, US 2019-09-20 Ashley Eskew Charleston, US 2019-09-20 Kristen Philip Katy, US 2019-09-20 Dante Taylor Pearland, US 2019-09-20 Davinder Singh Queesn, US 2019-09-20 Ashlie Kilgore Chatsworth, US 2019-09-20 Debbie Portnoy Clarksburg, US 2019-09-20 Sandy Vogel King Anoka, US 2019-09-20 Jocelyn James Rochester, US 2019-09-20 Steven watkins Tupelo, US 2019-09-20 kate groemling US 2019-09-20 Sandy Szymusiak Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-20 Dwight Singletary Carson, CA 2019-09-20 Lucia Scheng Fort Lauderdale, US 2019-09-20 Anthony Kakassy III Gastonia, US 2019-09-20 Brad Anderson West Jordan, US 2019-09-20 PATRICIA KENNEY FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ 2019-09-20 Coby Dickes Wayne, US 2019-09-20 Name location Date Lorenzo Salazar Franklin, US 2019-09-19 Linda Perez Los Angeles, US 2019-09-19 Carlos Rodriguez Los Angeles, US 2019-09-19 Dale Mullinax High Point, NC 2019-09-19 Estalin Macias Hollywood, US 2019-09-19 Joseph Cohen Valley Stream, US 2019-09-19 Beth Rosenthal Coral Springs, US 2019-09-19 Michael Reeves Salem, US 2019-09-19 Robert Gocha US 2019-09-19 Brenda Villarreal El Paso, US 2019-09-19 Melissa Weedo Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-19 Rick Toth Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Bart SheA Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-19 Merita Kraya Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Beth Lyons Cave Creek, AZ 2019-09-19 Lontesha Ellis Phoenix, US 2019-09-19 William Luzinski Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Rick Ponzo Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-19 Randal Becklund Tempe, AZ 2019-09-19 Tony Pierce Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-19 Sterling Gilmer Sacramento, US 2019-09-19 Bill Myers Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-19 Name Location Date Don and Sheila Gleason Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Michele Johnson Los Angeles, CA 2019-09-18 Halimah Abdus-Salaam East Orange, US 2019-09-18 clint lunde Redmond, US 2019-09-18 Megan Singer Toledo, US 2019-09-18 Sal Arico west Haverstraw, NY 2019-09-18 Dean Trimble Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Jane Robinson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Cynthia Couture Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Doug Leslie Gilbert, AZ 2019-09-18 Kellianne Minarik Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-18 AI Lorenz Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Jennifer Medina New York, US 2019-09-18 Melinda Stanton Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Steven Vargo Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Estelle Mackey Fountain Hills Az, Aruba 2019-09-18 Gwen Wallace Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Adrianne Silva Westminster, US 2019-09-18 Declan Fledderjohn Harrisburg, US 2019-09-18 Susan Brandes US 2019-09-18 Cassie Hansen Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Paulina Salas Las Vegas, US 2019-09-18 Name Location Date Diane Janiach Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-18 Brenda Aly Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Josh Babb Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Lisa Poll Fountain Hills, AR 2019-09-18 Tonya Coombs Honolulu, HI 2019-09-18 Jonathan Shotwell Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Anne Bofferding Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Zachary Dupuis DiMaggio Rutland, US 2019-09-18 Robin Huckabay Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 eddie soto maspeth, US 2019-09-18 Matthew Schneider Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-18 David Wint Windermere, US 2019-09-18 Sienna Neavez Chula vista, US 2019-09-18 Yundi Schneider Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-18 Debby Combs Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Ana Ruebel Ridgeland, US 2019-09-18 Shelley Stewart Fort McDowell, AZ 2019-09-18 Kelli Gratz Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Clarence Olson Connellys Springs, NC 2019-09-18 Sherri James Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Alicia Moss Asheville, US 2019-09-18 Michael Archambault Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Name Location Date Dennis Thompson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 John Gurczak Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 h.a. johnson corvallis, US 2019-09-17 Bill Washburn Tempe, AZ 2019-09-17 Judy Mayfield Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Richard Schultz Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Linda Kavanagh Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Chris Gaughan Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Dana Miller fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Mike McDonald Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Rachel Moore Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Robin McBride fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Clifford King Northwood, NH 2O19-09-17 Kathleen Maffei Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Chuck Bosnos Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Mary Ann Bosnos Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Kathy Ruebusch Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Patti Gruessing Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Julie Wilkens-Gaardsmoe Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-17 Eleanor Westphalen Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Barton Bright Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-18 Roni Locklin Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-18 Signatures Name location Date J Hall US 2019-09-16 Sue Kraus Fountain hills, AZ 2019-09-17 John Weil Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Linsey Kreschollek Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Julie Anderson Phoenix, AZ 2019-09-17 Tara Lamar Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Debbie Minarik Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Travis Robinson Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Julie Wemmert Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Betsy LaVoie Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Allison May Tempe, AZ 2019-09-17 Steven Kreschollek Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-17 Andi Bell FTNH, AZ 2019-09-17 Sheldon Johnson Fort Mcdowell, AZ 2019-09-17 Whitney Perce Scottsdale, AZ 2019-09-17 Trent Renner Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 Connor Nguyen Blacksburg, US 2019-09-17 Paul Kelleher Cork, Ireland 2019-09-17 Austan Coulston Portland, US 2019-09-17 Ryan Kuechler Fountain Hills, AZ 2019-09-17 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi --family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. 15 Z.4 57 k�, *VArc(Jo .br. It 1-t 11 `' r fi It I56z8 N CAVII-Lo t5k 'T 2c t �!� titer !G •J� t o wick 0. CJd,- - I -i s-o q- �. 'C 1.116 c Gvc �GC r,� 1 ST Ci ( rl , 1!)I urrrA CIO — - T > in—k- t1i 5 c�� M AN ett h44 4 r �A.�/ % G G O-2 �4 L[�c.rx1 r=5A l l rD v n, rrj;,J 4, t L S A 4"4dlW- �/S490 121c0ir ala'- o A& 12Z �s � PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE `' 3a4 N' Aer``' 'mil► r 932-9 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME Af- ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE Z-11 6Sr4p E �33- C�v,� K'r i s-) Fj re- she-r (3�00 , Faunfq�r -H it 16 kL)A * 839 1 �L' hOrp_k +1Z 0-1 63 - TviCa Avz G � 3o i 1 °f �u-e551e� ����, v���► k�1�� C I -14 4, 1-11 '1, �'L E-17; 1/1-) -11, N I -R-w�cw 2. l��-ttt�cp2 9 rSd �l z411A 'K4 v E Cyl lb00-67 eL PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. ADDRESS SIGNATURE 10M � Ir' - 151 v i/"' �� M r' I I Z 10 . , /W1, MMOA L Pi, i I '�" "m ww. 1A A % ) PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along witila Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of FH Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE 2-1 y,) C� Z� PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- 'init multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. N E ADDRESS DATE SI 61 _Z117 C bo,Ut 5 (3U,&6 14-131 L � P' wL" `112,11 f `7 N�- S�� �•� . �5 Zed � 3� I� Z N. PF-9*0,L�' PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. 1 l ' l i 1[ JA+71r f! I L • �_ tirlp 111431 r r PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE C / /Oil C_ PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi --Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of FH Residents and must be DENIED. ME „% (ARo Yov� ADDRESS t 5 2 3`i N �Cevi} DATE ftSIGNATURE psi I.O Icy r ,� VIC u 1 r415 Su.hbst !k aal q evp�- s�,..Q�a�� PETITION. AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NA ////�^���� ��.��.)�//��J� ADDRESS ADDRESS Illeol 4/ DATE }/ l///� SIGNAT May "S' VIki W-*M I � J r N11, F��re e IV �`- yr, l-ur q- - IR,7 1�9 c�c-Irk R f5fs� _ Ej r l644 4 0,! V t / C-r !1�711� Cyr vt r � e S Cv `f S 1 v At, Fvu..,,ku k. Vk' I 9 1va . A2 T1Z7) h AK Mario, IbG3o F_' ll� P►� JW71 �!9 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS , Ro����ae DATE g_ IV SIGN URE f�c: .ssss��, �4o61A/b,P. MAW t�DRD ragwgkcs. AZ 8 rz Z 3 9-"l 17.E Iy ,F. Oro crrro�de ti. a G fit- 1-73 1Y E "o NNd��.-y ivvm-A-;A) #,a's / ` -L XILt.6; 4j qqd Aj ►4lJl�[ "C"'u tir br uA2��a afly 0k) 1 lirj< 6% Eta• A& -'U Dc. � is A ' ?wqIV al�) a�� IP 1�J�7 Ali. �Pr. ti5(�3g Ckf�'- 00s of, Oa �261 N We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �! �� l r W W "10 I..�+►►jKO�40& NA ",105 , A1011W.-M, =A Lar F ff,. 4 I fFEM I 15 ;L NJ Z", lli�. : �Lq�\t��)KbA 7/30/17� vr- -i L t• vv��_ I 5 4 Ski P l` AI oPAu /k PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME Bq► 6avc"'40 (orao' ADDRESS11 151 C15 e 2ci afa DAT a 30 19 S ATURE a PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME aRLDq03K)N ADDRESS DATE --1 SI ATURE ��.Q,�c.e �C�c� l� o � l • q Manor /0000 7d'PL /0/0/// % WEN 1� ANN fv 1 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Gopperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hips that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE jxme �6�,'•r �- ` FOR �3 ..5 v, s-rra, tot ��� Cam Zy PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development dfbagydrdd k, A'. 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of FH Residents and must be DENIED. SIGNATURE 02MI MM W�Rvw'm V'V ffrav V 4" 40,7 1A NIZ r�� PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK IT We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE S SWWQR f o_ 14rlC41 RV f Cl f F t" faz s96e1ECrdi eY 1il c ��1 :f)C'r, L.w Pl oars i ouoarJ.& �� " i !G l I q 0 N 1 *J-P ; vt 64 But im 15'6 a ryas -U1/ J�� mot- �L kii . PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning northe wants and needs of concerned citizens and mustbe DENIED. NAME [— ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE • 64SL� 04( 1 YOu AJ Cr I1 719 Al. S 19 i2l'u RI IL- s 1�� � a-FFu�aN 01,- � -1s- /y MkA,Pk\ *tv6t l 2 �jZ 3 � 1 z.o &r"k6�AR tv PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK 13 We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE RIZ-7z;e 33r E 514.41 AAgc us Pat5EXT-1kP-uT-Q L_ 10'qxJV N DX_)-rARE_r12- LIRTAlN .1Kis, A7 8s`7&f PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. I ME ADDR SS DATrEr q/Zf S1G TURE Awi r � A (IIpn 4A ?or b I r✓j V ✓ Aq e,:S r�m 6(.Umeq� ? A 1 y N Sw,.,... f am FAY 111.1L!y?Wj'A We"I" • PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE a 60-I a,-,.,�C%rlTyt )575 3 C OGrofi 1 a7r: Fa��,�a osL � 1 4� 5e,J 151Tol P4WlebU � t�. �ls 4? 16s25V 1�f c i s rlrk 1v -�uWA,.' Mly S�o 9 �° �� ' f V4 ylznP � �12 ISaqG IF. -Ai 1s1a(t ,115, es 2 /12 PW/Y�a1� &-40 �lrf� / Pr aU l f// �C5� /�' - PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that the residents of Fountain Hills want our town to represent There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. M 1' w - �wwi� I 4 V PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the,,Oeveiopment of Daybreak- a 400-unit multvamily rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that the residents of Fountain Hills want our town to represent There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME I ADDRESS DATE I SIGNATURE vht)(p l U=rrril5kin 7 f1%_ IMw6 `l z • T � r DP4J#O f 11CV-5, Y7 W 5 ; f �j PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS 1l�Z41"'.) n- DU DATE 920 SIGNATURE I r 3 6 4,/ 4L, vST �O�+rD1 L l`1 � ►� E �� �e�+0 FTC "lls :2Sab_?Z l 5 191Zq C COJAVokus�J G a� �D�J � G• �w`�.J' r . . : (s t , t� 17��11�E-� tza.�� N� s0� .,� - �7� `� -- - / (I PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain. Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ` {%G/t115 ADDRESS I DATE I SIGNATURE .i(As�,��i� i�, isI.�� 9i1�� 9 Lhtca UILc�" I/o1�S�-S�,I��r. I q-1947IA���✓/!�/�itl�/ Rene"t rn. NoyoS 1102vq -�_ a 1 9 -a'0-' q /1D 2 lnc{r 17006 E Ca, 1 C Del (e D Du. l�0 Iq//,/. I`,-3 0— /1 War PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE t� u �iw��i I S5h2 9L6 n T'/ Ql 19 i 67ra0t- svhl+ uK t l 4;73 N,Saurlro fOUC77-►iN N,'1 s At j-n6r (3 Z rfn s /rf1:�-� Kre 1J W(144�a � f� A ixfa �w�• ray yc ,u a ,1,� )I- la�/mil 17�a S' �. �� al %� / GJ Lp � &ne5 op, f 18L D►aS�S u� �/ra r —� Fe,'ese KAa:c����`r- � _ If 15-70YF.Core-Z(s� r-rL r�(o '� 7� � PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK 11 We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS r 7 1'3 1 K DAT SIGNATURE a _ oc 1,19 boa J y '' �nr�5 U�r� 07lly��� t AJ. -Sono y r o�i 27 M-kn q a, ct, - A SO4o JocrA- ';s � I PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK I We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400- unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK A This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIG T PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this properly is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE Q% (4'r V�naCikl � AAW F-) M1QV(AM M Xit f e PWk1qP14 5(4vVu L E i roc } M-' n Lc ti yat f" y 9 - 29-I - 19yi91 I(1, 7/L S/ PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE L�R'/ P-Iolz S L � -9-19 ra i}sd aj e-, Az 9 9- �• i C 2 2C� 2, IU l Ls� S{— 2 fff �•-�f.c 1 &y(7 � �S -'A F3vr1� �1 -3aE 1S7%4 Fs�aN5D)L fbo.r_�alW � ��w1'Gl 1� e� vti � Flo vc �� Z L l -V PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK to This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast comer of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE 2e� lc>k Ma1-7 -IJI-F (A -e 70-1-Iq �WVA us�" .pride �;1b�►�S IT l C z53 3t. /3Lr1€�i Z z NASA >'�3N'v n1sK�ssshtr, -Alv)-1 u�U� O1138' , 77S.yPE r r�I�i N -i�' KAUSALVAkAT4-6'L-VAKAI -r5o r1 .3ASE4+►JE P-D .#1139 -Fgrq FC k 3 G /7rt ndd �r ,Y4 b ITO � °� a FP PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Dills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan: (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not fnr MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi --Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undgned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this dewdopment does not fit in with the FountEan Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGMA r 1 w� ✓ 3 ,�/' Svr/s ,d �I �,al� apt , e q( ( �qTW-/ �Q� Ec qd O /r /S& � G � our 1 7 1 /Ut�,UV� YOy01 ��.s�r�� � �6 �� � P0,10tn;N0 11 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast coiner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council f Ry recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hula General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and r. :1 1 r N iar I /0 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/clay to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind comer. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS _ DATE SIGNATURE C ��i "—O 'nve'C-'6't�s � 4 5fi rem 77,,5D Af �(O/-V�r q/ T-ivor L111 r�o tq(vi (ECts 07— 16?a5 ItW Jrd� 1q fj�L �6 I,,[['//��yyk/� � )j nn /f�/�.�{ ! � � �+QS Ll�, (� c o i, �l o Z t �// PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that the residents of Fountain Hills want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. Pip PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK .3 This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE 11>0911f PRO 0tarp Q �l ZS �+ m c '% lirs PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that the residents of Fountain Hills want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General. Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME Vvs k'f— i d. Ct,OrJ ADDRESS 26\L( � • 0\_jSC2 f c� zq-3 N 3 WtL-w4 sSo3 Ivc-t tv ,jlr�PL ; Sq `77 6 C . Sk& Kul I ofa�11Z z�ns�, tP 1/k 121?3 E OeW, 4 �A Sco4-F,s 4 le &2- j q a;� 1�. M{#-OMiTA -7761 6 Wood DZ `5c6rr AZ Boo .11%011:F. GJoob t12. Az_ 9&�� o DATE �/IG�1� f (Ot h ,qZU� ibr 1 q ql -Hl 11 i71�V1i9 9-'W4-/9 SIGNATURE t PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copper ynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. N ME 0 ADDRESS � V SI NA RE ' �- 1� PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK We, the residents of the Town of Fountain Hills, petition to stop the development of Daybreak, a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that we want our town to represent. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of Fountain Hills Residents and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE tj ce-- IO)Q- /'7�' 7/ PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 600' from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and this development will not be the image that is representative of Fountain Hills. There are over 13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. aOOMmmWRE Igoe 1� )69a_g4'4� PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 15,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic boo` from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that the residents of Fountain Hills want our town to represent. There are over '13 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (zolo) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE Sa,mantl�A Se,�Z 172-VI E 1 t—b Ico �i�d i Z5 PETITION AGAINST DAYBREAK This petition is to stop the development of Daybreak- a 400-unit multi -family rental complex on the northeast corner of Shea and Palisades in Fountain Hills, Arizona. There are more than 25,390 cars that pass daily on Palisades Boulevard, north of Shea Boulevard. Daybreak will add another 2500 trips/day to this road, not including the expansion of Copperwynd or Adero Canyon. Daybreak will have an exit to Shea that will cross 3 lanes of traffic 500` from Shea on a blind corner. Fountain Hills is renowned for its pristine image and panoramic mountain views and vistas. This is the Gateway to Fountain Hills from the West and will not be the image that the residents of Fountain Hills want our town to represent. There are over i3 variances, codes or standards in the General Plan (2010) of Fountain Hills that will need to be changed for this rental complex along with a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment. The current Zoning for this property is for Lodging (L-3) not for MFU (Multi -family Unrestricted) and MFR (Multi -Family Restricted) rental use. We, the undersigned, ask that the Town Council fully recognize that this development does not fit in with the Fountain Hills General Plan or the current Zoning nor the wants and needs of concerned citizens and must be DENIED. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE N11 -aq I13o I F _ 8 E L d k r s- GeA- (��5o E )LJder learn